Preprint Review Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Wheelchair Badminton: A Narrative Review of Its Specificities

Version 1 : Received: 12 January 2024 / Approved: 15 January 2024 / Online: 15 January 2024 (07:57:12 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Alberca, I.; Watier, B.; Chénier, F.; Brassart, F.; Faupin, A. Wheelchair Badminton: A Narrative Review of Its Specificities. Biomechanics 2024, 4, 219-234. Alberca, I.; Watier, B.; Chénier, F.; Brassart, F.; Faupin, A. Wheelchair Badminton: A Narrative Review of Its Specificities. Biomechanics 2024, 4, 219-234.

Abstract

This narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the scientific literature on wheelchair badminton and its distinctive aspects, encompassing abilities and disabilities, propulsion technique, and the use of a racket. The relatively young history of wheelchair badminton is reflected in the scarcity of scientific studies within this domain, highlighting the need for further investigation. The review systematically covers existing articles on wheelchair badminton, offering a nearly exhaustive compilation of knowledge in this area. Findings suggest that WH2 athletes engage in more intense matches with a higher frequency of offensive shots compared to WH1 athletes. Moreover, backward propulsion induces distinct physiological responses and alterations in propulsion kinematics, potentially leading to performance decrements. The use of a badminton racket further influences propulsion kinetics and kinematics, potentially impacting performance and injury risk. Further research is imperative to explore additional perspectives, address existing gaps, and expand the scope of study within the wheelchair badminton domain. This narrative review serves as a foundation for future investigations, emphasizing the necessity of continued research to enhance our understanding of wheelchair badminton.

Keywords

biomechanic; badminton particularities; racket; classification; propulsion direction

Subject

Physical Sciences, Other

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.