Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Bull Breeding Soundness Assessment using Artificial Neural Network-Based Predictive Model

Version 1 : Received: 10 December 2023 / Approved: 11 December 2023 / Online: 11 December 2023 (11:18:09 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Marín-Urías, L.F.; García-Ramírez, P.J.; Domínguez-Mancera, B.; Hernández-Beltrán, A.; Vásquez-Santacruz, J.A.; Cervantes-Acosta, P.; Barrientos-Morales, M.; Portillo-Vélez, R.J. Bull Breeding Soundness Assessment Using Artificial Neural Network-Based Predictive Models. Agriculture 2024, 14, 67. Marín-Urías, L.F.; García-Ramírez, P.J.; Domínguez-Mancera, B.; Hernández-Beltrán, A.; Vásquez-Santacruz, J.A.; Cervantes-Acosta, P.; Barrientos-Morales, M.; Portillo-Vélez, R.J. Bull Breeding Soundness Assessment Using Artificial Neural Network-Based Predictive Models. Agriculture 2024, 14, 67.

Abstract

For years, effort has been devoted to establishing an effective bull breeding soundness evaluation procedure; usual research on the subject is based on BBSE (Bull Breeding Soundness Examination) methodologies, which have significant limitations in terms of their evaluation procedure, such as high cost, time-consuming and administratively difficult. This research focuses on the creation of a prediction model to supplement and/or improve the BBSE approach, through the study of two algorithms, Clustering and Artificial Neural Network (ANN), to find the optimum Machine Learning (ML) approach for our application, with an emphasis on data categorization accuracy. The tool is designed to assist veterinary medicine and farmers in identifying key factors and increasing certainty in their decision-making during the selection of bulls for breeding purposes, providing data from a limited number of factors generated from a deep pairing study of bulls. Zebu Bulls, European Bulls, and Crossbred Bulls were the general groupings. The data utilized in the model's creation (N =359) considers five variables that influence improvement decisions. This approach enhances decision-making by 12%. ANN obtained an accuracy of 90%; Precision was 97% for satisfying, 92% for unsatisfying, and 85% for Bad.

Keywords

BBSE; Artificial Neural Networks; K-Means; Data Engineering

Subject

Biology and Life Sciences, Agricultural Science and Agronomy

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.