Submitted:
07 November 2023
Posted:
08 November 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
- Animals and samples collection
- Age estimation
- Histological analysis
- Virological analysis
- Bacteriological analysis
- Parasitological analysis
- Statistical analysis
3. Results
3.1. Age estimation
3.2. Histological analysis
3.3. Bacteriological, virological and parasitological analyses
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Carter, J.; Leonard, B.P. A Review of the Literature on the Worldwide Distribution, Spread of, and Efforts to Eradicate the Coypu (Myocastor Coypus). Wildlife Society Bulletin 2002, 30, 162–175. [Google Scholar]
- Adriani, S.; Bonanni, M.; Amici, A. Study on the Presence and Perception of Coypu (Myocastor Coypus Molina, 1782) in Three Areas of Lazio Region (Italy). Julius-Kühn-Archiv 2011, 432, 49–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panzacchi, M.; Cocchi, R.; Genovesi, P.; Bertolino, S. Population Control of Coypu Myocastor Coypus in Italy Compared to Eradication in UK: A Cost-Benefit Analysis. Wildlife Biology 2007, 13, 159–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nardoni, S.; Angelici, M.C.; Mugnaini, L.; Mancianti, F. Prevalence of Toxoplasma Gondii Infection in Myocastor Coypus in a Protected Italian Wetland. Parasites Vectors 2011, 4, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robert, H.; René-Marie, Lafontaine; Beudels-Jamar, R.C.; Delsinne, T.; Baiwy, E. Risk Analysis of the Coypu Myocastor Coypus (Molina, 1792). Risk Analysis Report of Non-Native Organisms in Belgium. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GISD Available online:. Available online: http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/ (accessed on 26 October 2023).
- Barrat, J.; Richomme, C.; Moinet, M. The Accidental Release of Exotic Species from Breeding Colonies and Zoological Collections: -EN- -FR- Lâcher Accidentel d’espèces Exotiques à Partir de Colonies d’élevage et de Collections Zoologiques -ES- Liberación Accidental de Especies Exóticas de Colonias Reproductoras y Colecciones Zoológicas. Rev. Sci. Tech. OIE 2010, 29, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, S.; Deng, T.; Zhang, J.; Li, Y. Global Economic Costs of Mammal Invasions. Science of The Total Environment 2023, 857, 159479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bollo, E.; Pregel, P.; Gennero, S.; Pizzoni, E.; Rosati, S.; Nebbia, P.; Biolatti, B. Health Status of a Population of Nutria (Myocastor Coypus) Living in a Protected Area in Italy. Research in Veterinary Science 2003, 75, 21–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Martino, P.E.; Stanchi, N.O.; Silvestrini, M.; Brihuega, B.; Samartino, L.; Parrado, E. Seroprevalence for Selected Pathogens of Zoonotic Importance in Wild Nutria (Myocastor Coypus). Eur J Wildl Res 2014, 60, 551–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Umhang, G.; Lahoreau, J.; Hormaz, V.; Boucher, J.-M.; Guenon, A.; Montange, D.; Grenouillet, F.; Boue, F. Surveillance and Management of Echinococcus Multilocularis in a Wildlife Park. Parasitology International 2016, 65, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gosling, L.M.; Huson, L.W.; Addison, G.C. Age Estimation of Coypus (Myocastor Coypus) from Eye Lens Weight. The Journal of Applied Ecology 1980, 17, 641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pagnoni, G.A.; Santolini, R. Struttura di popolazione di nutria (Myocastor coypus) in un’area agricola della Pianura Padana Orientale. 2011.
- Jothikumar, N.; Cromeans, T.L.; Robertson, B.H.; Meng, X.J.; Hill, V.R. A Broadly Reactive One-Step Real-Time RT-PCR Assay for Rapid and Sensitive Detection of Hepatitis E Virus. Journal of Virological Methods 2006, 131, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vanderhallen, H.; Koenen, F. Identification of Encephalomyocarditis Virus in Clinical Samples by Reverse Transcription-PCR Followed by Genetic Typing Using Sequence Analysis. J Clin Microbiol 1998, 36, 3463–3467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Forsman, M.; Sandstrom, G.; Sjostedt, A. Analysis of 16S Ribosomal DNA Sequences of Francisella Strains and Utilization for Determination of the Phylogeny of the Genus and for Identification of Strains by PCR. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 1994, 44, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Homan, W.L.; Vercammen, M.; Braekeleer, J.D.; Verschueren, H. Identi®cation of a 200- to 300-Fold Repetitive 529 Bp DNA Fragment in Toxoplasma Gondii, and Its Use for Diagnostic and Quantitative PCRp. International Journal for Parasitology 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Romano, A.; Trisciuoglio, A.; Grande, D.; Ferroglio, E. Comparison of Two PCR Protocols for the Detection of Neospora Caninum DNA in Rodents. Veterinary Parasitology 2009, 159, 159–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ferroglio, E.; Bosio, F.; Trisciuoglio, A.; Zanet, S. Toxoplasma Gondii in Sympatric Wild Herbivores and Carnivores: Epidemiology of Infection in the Western Alps. Parasit Vectors 2014, 7, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zanzani, S.A.; Cerbo, A.D.; Gazzonis, A.L.; Epis, S.; Invernizzi, A.; Tagliabue, S.; Manfredi, M.T. Parasitic and Bacterial Infections of Myocastor Coypus in a Metropolitan Area of Northwestern Italy. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 2016, 52, 126–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ayral, F.; Kodjo, A.; Guédon, G.; Boué, F.; Richomme, C. Muskrats Are Greater Carriers of Pathogenic Leptospira than Coypus in Ecosystems with Temperate Climates. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0228577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazzotta, E.; Bellinati, L.; Bertasio, C.; Boniotti, M.B.; Lucchese, L.; Ceglie, L.; Martignago, F.; Leopardi, S.; Natale, A. Synanthropic and Wild Animals as Sentinels of Zoonotic Agents: A Study of Leptospira Genotypes Circulating in Northeastern Italy. IJERPH 2023, 20, 3783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Howerth, E.W.; Reeves, A.J.; McElveen, M.R.; Austin, F.W. Survey for Selected Diseases in Nutria (Myocastor Coypus) from Louisiana. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 1994, 30, 450–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Montoya, J.G.; Liesenfeld, O. Toxoplasmosis. Lancet 2004, 363, 1965–1976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tyebji, S.; Seizova, S.; Hannan, A.J.; Tonkin, C.J. Toxoplasmosis: A Pathway to Neuropsychiatric Disorders. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 2019, 96, 72–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saadoun, A.; Cabrera, M.C. A Review of Productive Parameters, Nutritive Value and Technological Characteristics of Farmed Nutria Meat (Myocastor Coypus). Meat Science 2019, 148, 137–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
| Lesion | Number of samples positive for the lesion/total number of microscopical lesions (%) |
|---|---|
| Periportal lymphoid tissue activation | 8/18 (44.4%) |
| Parenchymal lymphocytic infiltrate | 7/18 (38.9%) |
| Perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate | 3/18 (16.7%) |
| Macrophage infiltration | 1/18 (5.6%) |
| Multifocal granuloma | 1/18 (5.6%) |
| Lesion | Number of samples positive for the lesion/total number of microscopical lesions (%) |
|---|---|
| Interstitial lymphocytic nephritis | 20/23 (87.0%) |
| Urine crystals | 2/23 (8.7%) |
| Perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate | 1/23 (4.3%) |
| Cyst with focal lymphocytic infiltrate | 1/23 (4.3%) |
| Interstitial lymphocytic and eosinophilic nephritis | 1/23 (4.3%) |
| Lymphocytic infiltrate into perirenal fat | 1/23 (4.3%) |
| Lesion | Number of samples positive for the lesion/total number of microscopical lesions (%) |
|---|---|
| Emphysema | 44/44 (100%) |
| Oedema | 36/44 (81.8%) |
| Parenchymal lymphocytic infiltrate | 36/44 (81.8%) |
| Perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate | 32/44 (72.7%) |
| BALT activation | 27/44 (61.4%) |
| Alveolar thickening | 12/44 (27.3%) |
| Atelectasis | 9/44 (20.5%) |
| Parenchymal lymphocytic and infiltrate | 2/44 (4.5%) |
| Lymphocytic bronchitis | 2/44 (4.5%) |
| Parenchymal neutrophilic infiltrate | 1/44 (2.3%) |
| Focal haemorrhages | 1/44 (2.3%) |
| Isolated bacteria | Number of samples positive /total number of analysed lungs (%) |
|---|---|
| Enterococcus spp. | 4/19 (21.0%) |
| Enterococcus hirae | 2/19 (10.5%) |
| Pseudomonas fluorescens | 2/19 (10.5%) |
| Nocardia spp. | 2/19 (10.5%) |
| Enterococcus durans | 1/19 (5.3%) |
| Pseudomonas mendocina | 1/19 (5.3%) |
| Achromobacter xylosoxidans | 1/19 (5.3%) |
| Brevibacillus laterosporus | 1/19 (5.3%) |
| Corynebacterium propinquum | 1/19 (5.3%) |
| Corynebacterium pseudodiphthericum | 1/19 (5.3%) |
| Ochrobactrum anthropi | 1/19 (5.3%) |
| Streptococcus aginosus | 1/19 (5.3%) |
| Non-identifiable | 1/19 (5.3%) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).