Submitted:
02 November 2023
Posted:
02 November 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction:
2. Materials and Methods:
Ethical approval
Study design and location
Study population
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Identification of HH contacts for TPT
Initiation of TPT with 3HP
Treatment support and monitoring of adverse events
Data Analysis
3. Results:
Demographic and clinical characteristics
Evaluation, Initiation, and Completion of TPT among the HH contacts
Reported adverse events
Factors associated with TPT completion with the 3HP regimen
Intervention approaches
4. Discussion:
5. Conclusions:
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Uplekar M, Weil D, Lonnroth K, Jaramillo E, Lienhardt C, Dias HM, Falzon D, Floyd K, Gargioni G, Getahun H: WHO's new end TB strategy. The Lancet 2015, 385(9979):1799-1801.
- Houben RM, Dodd PJ: The global burden of latent tuberculosis infection: a re-estimation using mathematical modelling. PLoS medicine 2016, 13(10):e1002152.
- World Health Organization: Latent TB infection: updated and consolidated guidelines for programmatic management. Geneva: World Health Organization 2018.
- Styblo K: The relationship between the risk of tuberculous infection and the risk of developing infectious tuberculosis. Bull IUAT 1985, 60(3):117-119.
- Dye C, Glaziou P, Floyd K, Raviglione M: Prospects for tuberculosis elimination. Annual review of public health 2013, 34.
- Getahun H, Matteelli A, Abubakar I, Aziz MA, Baddeley A, Barreira D, Den Boon S, Gutierrez SMB, Bruchfeld J, Burhan E: Management of latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection: WHO guidelines for low tuberculosis burden countries. European Respiratory Journal 2015, 46(6):1563-1576.
- World Health Organization: Global tuberculosis report 2020. Glob Tuberc Rep 2020, 2020.
- National TB Control Program: Tuberculosis Control in Bangladesh : Annual report 2019. Dhaka: Directorate General of Health Services; 2019.
- Stuurman AL, Noordegraaf-Schouten MV, van Kessel F, Oordt-Speets AM, Sandgren A, van der Werf MJ: Interventions for improving adherence to treatment for latent tuberculosis infection: a systematic review. BMC infectious diseases 2016, 16(1):1-17.
- Martinson NA, Barnes GL, Moulton LH, Msandiwa R, Hausler H, Ram M, McIntyre JA, Gray GE, Chaisson RE: New regimens to prevent tuberculosis in adults with HIV infection. New England Journal of Medicine 2011, 365(1):11-20.
- Sterling TR, Villarino ME, Borisov AS, Shang N, Gordin F, Bliven-Sizemore E, Hackman J, Hamilton CD, Menzies D, Kerrigan A: Three months of rifapentine and isoniazid for latent tuberculosis infection. New England Journal of Medicine 2011, 365(23):2155-2166.
- Villarino ME, Scott NA, Weis SE, Weiner M, Conde MB, Jones B, Nachman S, Oliveira R, Moro RN, Shang N: Treatment for preventing tuberculosis in children and adolescents: a randomized clinical trial of a 3-month, 12-dose regimen of a combination of rifapentine and isoniazid. JAMA pediatrics 2015, 169(3):247-255.
- Sharma SK, Sharma A, Kadhiravan T, Tharyan P: Rifamycins (rifampicin, rifabutin and rifapentine) compared to isoniazid for preventing tuberculosis in HIV-negative people at risk of active TB. Evidence-Based Child Health: A Cochrane Review Journal 2014, 9(1):169-294.
- Njie GJ, Morris SB, Woodruff RY, Moro RN, Vernon AA, Borisov AS: Isoniazid-rifapentine for latent tuberculosis infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. American journal of preventive medicine 2018, 55(2):244-252.
- Zenner D, Beer N, Harris RJ, Lipman MC, Stagg HR, Van Der Werf MJ: Treatment of latent tuberculosis infection: an updated network meta-analysis. Annals of internal medicine 2017, 167(4):248-255.
- Semitala FC, Kadota JL, Musinguzi A, Nabunje J, Welishe F, Nakitende A, Akello L, Bishop O, Patel D, Sammann A: Completion of isoniazid–rifapentine (3HP) for tuberculosis prevention among people living with HIV: Interim analysis of a hybrid type 3 effectiveness–implementation randomized trial. PLoS medicine 2021, 18(12):e1003875.
- Yuen CM, Majidulla A, Jaswal M, Safdar N, Malik AA, Khan AJ, Becerra MC, Keshavjee S, Lu C, Hussain H: Cost of delivering 12-dose isoniazid and rifapentine versus 6 months of isoniazid for tuberculosis infection in a high-burden setting. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2021, 73(5):e1135-e1141.
- Project CT: Contextual Factors Affecting Implementation and Uptake of Preventive Treatment in Urban Settings: A Qualitative Study. In. Dhaka, Bangladesh: IRD, MSH, KNCV; June 2018.
- Hamada Y, Ford N, Schenkel K, Getahun H: Three-month weekly rifapentine plus isoniazid for tuberculosis preventive treatment: a systematic review. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 2018, 22(12):1422-1428.
- Harries AD, Kumar AM, Satyanarayana S, Takarinda KC, Timire C, Dlodlo RA: Treatment for latent tuberculosis infection in low-and middle-income countries: progress and challenges with implementation and scale-up. Expert review of respiratory medicine 2020, 14(2):195-208.
- Pease C, Hutton B, Yazdi F, Wolfe D, Hamel C, Quach P, Skidmore B, Moher D, Alvarez GG: Efficacy and completion rates of rifapentine and isoniazid (3HP) compared to other treatment regimens for latent tuberculosis infection: a systematic review with network meta-analyses. BMC infectious diseases 2017, 17(1):1-11.
- Sandul AL, Nwana N, Holcombe JM, Lobato MN, Marks S, Webb R, Wang S-H, Stewart B, Griffin P, Hunt G: High rate of treatment completion in program settings with 12-dose weekly isoniazid and rifapentine for latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2017, 65(7):1085-1093.
- Belknap R, Holland D, Feng P, Millet J, Caylà J, Martinson N, Wright A, Chen M, Moro R, Scott N: TB Trials Consortium iAdhere Study Team Self-administered versus directly observed once-weekly isoniazid and rifapentine treatment of latent tuberculosis infection: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2017, 167(10):689-697.
- Haas MK, Aiona K, Erlandson KM, Belknap RW: Higher Completion Rates with Self-administered Once-weekly Isoniazid-Rifapentine versus Daily Rifampin in Adults with Latent Tuberculosis. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2021, 73(9):e3459-e3467.
- Cruz AT, Starke JR: Completion rate and safety of tuberculosis infection treatment with shorter regimens. Pediatrics 2018, 141(2).
- Yang H, Yang Y, Hu Z-d, Xia L, Liu X-h, Yu X, Ma J-y, Li T, Lu S-h: High rate of completion for weekly rifapentine plus isoniazid treatment in Chinese children with latent tuberculosis infection—A single center study. Plos one 2021, 16(6):e0253159.
- Surey J, Stagg HR, Yates TA, Lipman M, White PJ, Charlett A, Muñoz L, Gosce L, Rangaka MX, Francis M: An open label, randomised controlled trial of rifapentine versus rifampicin based short course regimens for the treatment of latent tuberculosis in England: the HALT LTBI pilot study. BMC infectious diseases 2021, 21(1):1-8.
- Stennis NL, Burzynski JN, Herbert C, Nilsen D, Macaraig M: Treatment for tuberculosis infection with 3 months of isoniazid and rifapentine in New York City health department clinics. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2016, 62(1):53-59.
- Huang H-L, Lee M-R, Cheng M-H, Lu P-L, Huang C-K, Sheu C-C, Lai P-C, Chen T-C, Wang J-Y, Chong I-W: Impact of age on outcome of rifapentine-based weekly therapy for latent tuberculosis infection. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2021, 73(5):e1064-e1071.
- Walker RE, Bass S, Srinivas P, Miranda C, Johnson L, Pallotta AM: Evaluation of 3 months of once-weekly rifapentine and isoniazid for latent tuberculosis infection. Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2020, 54(5):457-463.
- Murphy AM, Thomas A, Crinion SJ, Kent BD, Tambuwala MM, Fabre A, Pepin J-L, Roche HM, Arnaud C, Ryan S: Intermittent hypoxia in obstructive sleep apnoea mediates insulin resistance through adipose tissue inflammation. European Respiratory Journal 2017, 49(4).
- Sun H-Y, Huang Y-W, Huang W-C, Chang L-Y, Chan P-C, Chuang Y-C, Ruan S-Y, Wang J-Y, Wang J-T: Twelve-dose weekly rifapentine plus isoniazid for latent tuberculosis infection: a multicentre randomised controlled trial in Taiwan. Tuberculosis 2018, 111:121-126.
- Malik AA, Farooq S, Jaswal M, Khan H, Nasir K, Fareed U, Shahbaz S, Amanullah F, Safdar N, Khan AJ: Safety and feasibility of 1 month of daily rifapentine plus isoniazid to prevent tuberculosis in children and adolescents: a prospective cohort study. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health 2021, 5(5):350-356.
- Schmit KM, Wortham JM, Ho CS, Powell KM: Analysis of severe adverse events reported among patients receiving isoniazid-rifapentine treatment for latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection—United States, 2012–2016. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2020, 71(9):2502-2505.
- Yu Y-Y, Tsao S-M, Yang W-T, Huang W-C, Lin C-H, Chen W-W, Yang S-F, Chiou H-L, Huang Y-W: Association of drug metabolic enzyme genetic polymorphisms and adverse drug reactions in patients receiving rifapentine and isoniazid therapy for latent tuberculosis. International journal of environmental research and public health 2020, 17(1):210.
- Pease C, Hutton B, Yazdi F, Wolfe D, Hamel C, Barbeau P, Skidmore B, Alvarez GG: A systematic review of adverse events of rifapentine and isoniazid compared to other treatments for latent tuberculosis infection. Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety 2018, 27(6):557-566.
- Terpstra J, Coleman KJ, Simon G, Nebeker C: The role of community health workers (CHWs) in health promotion research: ethical challenges and practical solutions. Health promotion practice 2011, 12(1):86-93.
- Mistry SK, Harris-Roxas B, Yadav UN, Shabnam S, Rawal LB, Harris MF: Community health workers can provide psychosocial support to the people during COVID-19 and beyond in low-and middle-income countries. Frontiers in Public Health 2021:800.

| Variables | Household Contacts Verbally Screened (n=2,149) |
Household Contacts Initiated TPT with 3HP (n=1,216) |
|---|---|---|
| Age - Mean age (+ SD) | 21.2(±17.5) | 27. 4(± 23.8) |
| < 5 | 65 (3.0%) | 40 (3.3%) |
| 5- < 15 | 484 (22.5%) | 272 (22.4%) |
| 15 and above | 1,600 (74.5%) | 904 (74.3%) |
| Female | 1,178 (54.8%) | 675 (56.0%) |
| Schooling in year | ||
| No schooling | 323 (15.0%) | 146 (12.0%) |
| 1-5 years | 726 (33.8%) | 383 (31.5%) |
| 6-10 years | 710 (33.0%) | 345 (28.4%) |
| 10+ years | 390 (18.1%) | 342 (28.1%) |
| Household Income/month in Bangladeshi Taka (mean±SD)* | 14,532 ± 9,853 | 15,251 ± 10,235 |
| ≤ 5000 | 14 (0.7%) | 7 (0.5%) |
| 5001 – 10000 | 321 (14.9%) | 165 (13.6%) |
| 10001 – 20000+ | 1,814 (84.4%) | 1,044 (85.9%) |
| Original residence | ||
| Permanent of Dhaka | 677 (31.5%) | 398 (32.7%) |
| Tenant (rural-to-urban migrant) | 1,472 (68.5%) | 818 (67.3%) |
| Current dwelling status | ||
| Living in slums | 1027 (47.8%) | 589 (48.4%) |
| Non-slum households | 1,122 (52.2%) | 627 (51.6%) |
| Occupation | ||
| Student and dependent child | 543 (25.3%) | 361 (29.7%) |
| Day labour/Garments/Factory Worker | 605 (28.2%) | 234 (19.2%) |
| Self-employed and business | 359 (16.7%) | 138 (11.3%) |
| Public/Private Service | 246 (11.4%) | 132 (10.9%) |
| Home maker | 380 (19.9%) | 341 (28.0%) |
| Unemployed | 16 (0.7%) | 10 (0.8%) |
| Current or past smoker | 892 (41.4) | 483 (39.7%) |
| Comorbidity | ||
| No comorbidity | 1,372 (68.5%) | 1,194 (98.2%) |
| Diabetes mellitus | 95 (4.4%) | 16 (1.3%) |
| Hypertension | 409 (19.0%) | 04 (0.3%) |
| Asthma | 14 (0.7%) | 01 (0.1%) |
| Thyroid dysfunction | 159 (7.4%) | 01 (0.1%) |
| Experienced any adverse events | NA | 65 (5.3%) |
| Experienced adverse events after any 3HP dose by type* | Frequency** with Grading*** | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Graded | Grade 1 | Grade 2 | Grade 3, 4 and 5 | |
| Gastrointestinal – nausea/vomiting | - | 20 (1.64%) | 01 (0.08%) | - |
| Neurological symptoms | - | 01 (0.08%) | - | - |
| Muscle pain | - | 02 (0.16%) | - | - |
| Hepatotoxicity | - | 00 (0.00%) | - | - |
| Flu like symptoms | - | 10 (0.82%) | 01 (0.08%) | - |
| Dermal – itching/skin rash | 01 (0.08%) | 09 (0.74%) | - | - |
| Respiratory symptoms | - | 02 (0.16%) | - | - |
| Fatigue | - | 07 (0.58%) | - | - |
| Headache | - | 06 (0.49%) | - | - |
| Other symptoms ‡ | - | 05 (0.41%) | - | - |
| Total experienced adverse events | 01 (0.08%) | 62 (5.09%) | 02 (0.16%) | 00 (0.00%) |
| Variables | Bivariate Model | Multivariable Model* | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | P value | OR (95% CI) | P value | |
| Current Age (r = age < 15 years) | 2.1 (1.8-2.4) | 0.004 | 1.5 (1.1-2.0) | 0.043 |
| Female (r = male) | 2.5 (1.7-2.8) | 0.002 | 1.7 (1.3-2.1) | 0.009 |
| Schooling in year (r=0) | 2.2 (1.7-2.5) | 0.004 | 1.4 (1.1-1.9) | 0.044 |
| Monthly household income > 10,000 Taka (r= ≤ 10,000 Taka)a | 1.7 (1.3-2.1) | 0.005 | 1.5 (1.0-2.1) | 0.047 |
| Permeant urban resident (r=rural-to-urban migrant with temporary settlement) | 1.2 (0.8-2.3) | 0.098 | NA | |
| Lives in non-slum households (r= lives in slums) | 1.6 (1.3-2.1) | 0.049 | 1.1 (0.7-2.4) | 0.088 |
| Occupation: non-manual work (r= manual work) | 1.1 (0.7-2.7) | 0.106 | NA | |
| No comorbidities (r= have had any comorbidities) | 2.3 (1.8-2.5) | 0.008 | 1.7 (1.1-2.2) | 0.046 |
| Experienced no adverse events (r = experienced any adverse events) | 1.8 (1.3-2.4) | 0.003 | 1.6 (1.2-2.1) | 0.009 |
| Intervention Approaches | ||||
|
2.7 (2.1-3.2) | 0.002 | 1.9 (1.5-2.4) | 0.007 |
|
3.2 (2.7-3.6) | 0.001 | 2.1 (1.5-2.7) | 0.005 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).