Submitted:
28 August 2023
Posted:
29 August 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease of the central nervous system. According to recent studies, cellular senescence caused by telomere shortening may contribute to the development of MS. Aim of the study: to determine the associations of TEP1 rs1760904, rs1713418, TERC rs12696304, rs35073794 gene polymorphisms with the occurrence of MS. Methods: The study included 200 patients with MS and 230 healthy controls. Genotyping of TEP1 rs1760904, rs1713418 and TERC rs12696304, rs35073794 was performed using RT-PCR. Statistical analysis of the obtained data was performed using the program "IBM SPSS Statistics 29.0". Haplotype analysis was performed using the online program "SNPStats". Results: The TERC rs12696304 G allele of this SNP is associated with a 1.4-fold lower odds of developing MS (p=0.035). TERC rs35073794 is associated with an approximately 2.4-fold reduced odds of MS occurrence in the codominant, dominant, overdominant, and additive models (p < 0.001; p < 0.001; p < 0.001; p < 0.001, respectively). Haplotype analysis shows that the rs1760904-G - rs1713418-A haplotype is statistically significantly associated with a 1.75-fold increased odds of developing MS (p=0.006). The rs12696304-C - rs35073794-A haplotype is statistically significantly associated with a 2-fold decreased odds of developing MS (p=0.008). In addition, the rs12696304-G - rs35073794-A haplotype was found to be statistically significantly associated with a 5.3-fold decreased odds of developing MS (p<0.001). Conclusion: Current evidence may suggest a protective role of TERC SNP in the occurrence of MS, while TEP1 has the opposite effect.
Keywords:
Multiple sclerosis
; TEP1 rs1760904
; rs1713418
; TERC rs12696304
; rs35073794
1. Introduction
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease of the central nervous system (CNS) [1]. The incidence and prevalence rates of this disease are increasing worldwide. According to the Atlas of MS, 3rd edition, prepared by the Multiple Sclerosis International Federation, approximately 2.8 million people worldwide have MS. Lithuania belongs to the region of high prevalence and morbidity of MS (prevalence per 100,000 people is 101-200) [2]. MS is most commonly diagnosed in people between 20 and 40 years of age. Less commonly, it occurs in childhood (less than 1%) and after the age of 50 (about 2-10%) [3]. Moreover, MS is 2 to 3 times more common in women than in men [4]. MS is a multifactorial disease whose development is influenced by genetic and environmental factors [5]. Several pathological processes contribute to the development of MS, including blood-brain barrier (BBB) damage, multifocal inflammatory responses, demyelination, oligodendrocyte death, reactivated gliosis, and axonal degeneration [6].
According to recent studies, cellular senescence caused by telomere shortening may contribute to the development of MS [5]. To maintain the integrity of the genome, telomeres protect chromosomes from end fusion and degradation by exonucleases. Telomeres are specialized structures located at the ends of eukaryotic chromosomes and are composed of tandem nucleotide repeats (TTAGGG) and proteins [7]. When telomeric DNA regions are critically shortened, they can signal replicative senescence of somatic cells and chromosome instability [8]. Telomerase is a ribonucleoprotein enzyme critical for the replication of telomeric sequences in chromosomal DNA. The enzyme complex includes several components, including the telomerase RNA component (TERC), telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT), dyskerin, and other accessory proteins such as TEP1 [8,9].
TERC binds to the 3' end of chromosomes and provides a template sequence for reverse transcription catalyzed by TERT [10]. According to recent studies, TERC inhibits apoptosis in immune cells, protects neurons from oxidative stress, and enhances cellular inflammatory responses [11]. TERC has been shown to increase the expression and release of inflammatory cytokines by directly binding to the promoters of the LIN37, TPRG1L, TYROBP, and USP16 genes. These four genes encode proteins involved in the activation of the transcription factor nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) [11,12]. Inflammatory responses lead to progressive shortening of telomeres, which has been linked to the development of age-related diseases [13]. It has been observed that naive CD4+ T cells from patients with rheumatoid arthritis exhibit increased telomerase inhibition, resulting in shortened telomeres due to decreased expression of TERT and TERC. For this reason, T cell subset aging is accelerated and autoimmunity is activated [14]. TERC levels have been shown to be increased in individuals with MS or type II diabetes. It should be noted that these two diseases are associated with inflammatory responses [12].
The TERC gene is located on the long arm of chromosome 3 at position 26.2 (3q26.2) [15]. TERC is responsible for regulating telomere length [16]. Studies in mice have shown that TERC is involved in neural progenitor cell (NPC) proliferation. It has been observed that in mice in which the TERC gene is knocked out, there is a statistically significant decrease in the proliferation of NPC. It has also been found that neurons cannot fully mature when the TERC gene is knocked out in NPC [17]. In addition, studies have shown that TERC gene polymorphisms influence the development of Alzheimer's disease [18]. Since a relationship between TERC and MS has been established in the scientific literature, we decided to analyze the SNP rs12696304 and rs35073794 of the TERC gene. Polymorphisms in the TERC gene have been associated with changes in telomere length due to altered telomerase activity [19,20,21]. The SNP rs12696304 C > G is located in the in the downstream region of the TERC gene, i.e. 1.5 kb away from the transcription start nucleotide [21]. The rs35073794 A > G SNP is also located in the downstream region of the TERC gene [20]. Thus, polymorphisms in the TERC gene may promote cellular senescence by altering the stability of the telomerase complex or directly affecting the enzymatic activity of telomerase [18].
TEP1 is responsible for RNA and protein binding and is involved in the regulation of telomere length [22,23]. TEP1 is thought to function as a structural protein by binding to TERC and acting as a regulatory subunit to mediate the interaction of telomerase with other molecules [24]. In addition, TEP1 and dyskerin are responsible for stabilizing the structure of telomerase [25]. In addition, TEP1 directly interacts with the BLM protein of Bloom syndrome and regulates its helicase activity. Thus, it can be assumed that TEP1 is involved in telomere lengthening [26].
The TEP1 gene is located on the long arm of chromosome 14 at position 11.2 (14q11.2) [27]. According to NCBI, the TEP1 gene consists of 55 exons [28]. This gene is responsible for telomere elongation and prevents neuron development due to DNA damage. Ren et al. found that TEP1 is associated with white matter microstructure abnormality in schizophrenia [29]. Using whole-exome sequencing, Sebate and colleagues discovered that pathogenic mutations in the TEP1 gene contribute to the neurodegenerative disease of Parkinson's disease [30]. According to the available data, there have been no studies investigating the association between TEP1 and MS. Based on previous studies in neurological diseases, it can be assumed that the TEP1 gene is involved in MS. In this study, we aimed to determine the influence of the TEP1 gene SNP rs1760904 and rs1713418 on the occurrence of MS.The SNP rs1760904 A > G is located in the exon region of the TEP1 gene [23,26]. Rs1760904 is a nonsynonymous SNP and causes a proline-to-serine substitution (Ser1195Pro) that may affect TEP1 structure and telomerase [26]. Rs1713418 A > G SNP is located in the 3'UTR region of the TEP1 gene [26]. SNP in the 3'UTR alters the ability of miRNA to bind to the target gene, which affects gene regulation and increases the risk of MS [31].
Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the associations of TEP1 rs1760904, rs1713418, TERC rs12696304 and rs35073794 polymorphisms with the occurrence in MS patients.
2. Materials and Methods
The study was performed at the Department of Neurology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences and in the Ophthalmology laboratory, Neuroscience Institute Lithuanian University of Health Sciences. Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Kaunas Regional Biomedical Research Ethics Committee (No. BE-2-102, issued November 14, 2019). Each study participant signed the informed consent form. The subjects were divided into two groups:
1. The first group of study participants consisted of 200 MS patients (n=200) aged 21 to 69 years. This group consisted of 98 (49%) females and 102 (51%) males participants. The MS diagnosis was confirmed using the 2017 diagnostic criteria: by clinical symptoms/relapses, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) findings of the brain and/or spinal cord with typical demyelinating lesions (according to MAGNIMS criteria), and positive oligoclonal bands (OCBs) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) [32,33].
2. The second group of study participants consisted of 230 healthy volunteers (n=230) aged 19 to 69 years. This group was composed of 133 (57.8%) females and 97 (42.2%) males. The control group consisted of individuals in good general health.
Patients were excluded if they had other systemic illnesses (diabetes mellitus, oncological diseases, systemic tissue disorders, chronic infectious diseases, autoimmune diseases, conditions after organ or tissue transplantation), obscuration of the eye optic system, or because of poor fundus photography quality.
The demographic factors of the patients in the study MS and the control group - age and gender - were evaluated in the study. Subjects were divided into < 44 years and ≥44 years old.
2.1. DNA Extraction and Genotyping
Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes by a salting-out method. Genotyping of TEP1 rs1760904, rs1713418 and TERC rs12696304, rs35073794 was performed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). To determine SNPs, we used TaqMan® genotyping assays (Applied Biosystems, New York, NY, USA; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Assay IDs: C___1772362_20 (TEP1 rs1760904), C___8921332_10 (TEP1 rs1713418), C____407063_10 (TERC rs12696304), and C__58097851_10 (TERC rs35073794).
2.2. Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis of the scientific work was carried out with "IBM SPSS Statistics 29.0.". In this study, Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests were used to evaluate the hypothesis about the normal distribution of the measured trait values. Because the subjects' characteristics did not meet the requirements of a normal distribution, the following descriptive statistics were used: Median and Interquartile Range (IQR).
The χ²-test and Fisher's exact test were used to compare the homogeneity of the genotypes and allele distributions of the TEP1 rs1760904, rs1713418, TERC rs12696304, and rs35073794 gene polymorphisms. In addition, binary logistic regression was performed to evaluate the influence of genotypes and alleles on the occurrence of MS. Considering inheritance models and genotype combinations, the odds ratio (OR) was determined with a 95% confidence interval (CI). According to the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), the model with the lowest value is the most appropriate inheritance model. As part of the analysis, the program "SNPStats" was also used to analyze the haplotypes. An evaluation of the linkage disequilibrium between the studied gene polymorphisms was performed. The deviation between the expected haplotype frequency and the observed frequency (D') was calculated and the square of the correlation coefficient of the haplotype frequency (r2) was evaluated.
3. Results
The study involved 430 subjects who were divided into two groups: a control group (n=230) and a group of subjects with MS (n=200). After the formation of the study groups, genotyping of TEP1 rs1760904, rs1713418, TERC rs12696304 and rs35073794 polymorphisms was performed. The group of patients with MS consisted of 200 individuals: 98 females (49%) and 102 males (51%). The average age of the MS patients was 38 years. The control group consisted of 230 subjects: 133 females (57.8%) and 97 males (42.2%). The median age of the control group was 43.5 years. Sex and age did not differ between the groups. The demographic data of the subjects are shown in Table 1.
Associations of TEP1 (rs1760904, rs1713418) and TERC (rs12696304, rs35073794) with Multiple Sclerosis
Analysis of the genotype and allele distribution of TEP1 rs1760904, rs1713418 and TERC rs12696304, rs35073794 revealed that the TERC rs12696304 G allele was less frequent in the MS group than in the control group (20.5% vs. 26.5%, p=0.038). In addition, the TERC rs35073794 GG genotype was found to be more frequent in the MS group than in the control group (54.0% vs. 32.6%, p < 0.001). AG Genotype and A allele of the same polymorphism are less frequent in the MS group than in the control group (45.5% vs. 67.4%, p < 0.001; 23.25 vs. 33.7, p < 0.001) (Table 2).
No statistically significant differences were found in the distribution of genotypes and alleles of TEP1 gene rs1760904 and rs1713418 between groups MS and control group (Table 2).
After performing binary logistic regression, we found that each G allele of the TERC gene polymorphism rs12696304 was associated with a 1.4-fold decrease in the probability of occurrence of MS (OR: 0.703, (95% CI: 0.506-0.976), p=0.035). TERC rs35073794 is associated with an approximately 2.4-fold reduced odds of MS occurrence in the codominant, dominant, overdominant, and additive models (OR: 0.408, (95% CI: 0.275 - 0.603), p < 0.001; OR: 0.412 (95% CI: 0.279 - 0.610), p < 0.001; OR: 0.404 (95% CI: 0.273 - 0.598), p < 0.001; OR: 0.427 (95% CI: 0.289 - 0.629), p < 0.001, respectively) (Table 3). However, analysis of TEP1 rs1760904 and rs1713418 revealed no statistically significant differences (Table 3).
Association of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms of TEP1 (rs1760904, rs1713418) and TERC (rs12696304, rs35073794) Genes with Multiple Sclerosis Regarding Gender of the Subjects
Analysis of SNP data in males and females revealed that the TERC rs12696304 genotype CC and the C allele were more prevalent in the group of males with MS than in the control group of males (68.6% vs. 52.6%, p=0.020; 83.33% vs. 72.16%, p=0.007, respectively). In contrast, the TERC rs12696304 GG genotype is less frequent in the group of men with MS than in the control group of men (2.0% vs. 8.2%, p=0.043). The TERC rs35073794 GG genotype is more frequent in the group of men with MS than in the control group of men (59.8% vs. 25.8%, p < 0.001). In addition, the AG genotype and the A allele of the same polymorphism are less frequent in the group of men with MS than in the control group of men (39.2% vs. 74.2%, p < 0.001; 20.59% vs. 37.11%, p < 0.001, respectively). When the distribution of TEP1 rs1760904 and rs1713418 genotypes and alleles was analysed between men with MS and healthy men, no differences were found (Table 4).
No differences were found when comparing the distribution of genotypes and alleles of TEP1 rs1760904, rs1713418 and TERC rs12696304, rs35073794 between women with MS and the female control group (p>0,05) (Table 4).
Using binary logistic regression, we examined the effects of TEP1 rs1760904, rs1713418 and TERC rs12696304, rs35073794 on the occurrence of MS in men and women separately.
When the male group was analyzed, TERC rs12696304 was found to be associated with a decreased odds of MS occurrence in males in the codominant, dominant, and additive models (5.5-fold (OR: 0.182, (95% CI: 0.037-0.894), p=0.036), 2-fold (OR =0.507, (95% CI: 0.284-0.903), p=0.021) and 1.9-fold (OR: 0.515, (95% CI: 0.314-0.845), p=0.009), respectively). TERC rs35073794 is associated with approximately 4.4-fold decreased odds of MS occurring in males in the codominant, dominant, and overdominant models (OR: 0.228, (95% CI: 0.124 - 0.417), p < 0.001; OR: 0.233 (95% CI: 0.128 - 0.427), p < 0.001; OR: 0.224 (95% CI: 0.122 - 0.410), p < 0.001, respectively). In addition, we found that TERC rs35073794 each A allele was associated with a 3.9-fold decreased odds of MS occurrence in males (OR: 0.256, (95% CI: 0.141 - 0.462), p < 0.001). After performing binary logistic regression of TEP1 rs1760904, rs1713418, we found no statistically significant differences between MS men and control men.
When binary logistic regression analysis of TEP1 rs1760904, rs1713418 and TERC rs12696304, rs35073794 gene polymorphisms was performed, no statistically significant differences were found between women with MS and healthy women (p>0,05). Data show in Table 5.
3.2.2. Association of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms of TEP1 (rs1760904, rs1713418) and TERC (rs12696304, rs35073794) Genes with Multiple Sclerosis Regarding Age of the Subjects
In this study, we investigated the influence of TEP1 rs1760904, rs1713418 and TERC rs12696304, rs35073794 gene polymorphisms on the occurrence of MS according to age groups. Subjects were divided into < 44 years and ≥44 years old.
Genotype and allele distribution analysis revealed that the TERC rs35073794 GG genotype was more prevalent in MS patients younger than 44 years than in the control group (55.6% vs. 27.0%, p < 0.001). In addition, the same polymorphism A allele was found to be less frequent in MS patients younger than 44 years compared to the control group (22.2% vs. 36.5%, p < 0.001). When analysing the genotype and allele distribution of TEP1 rs1760904, rs1713418 and TERC rs12696304, no statistically significant differences were found between MS patients younger than 44 years and the control group (p>0.05). When comparing the distribution of genotypes and alleles of TEP1 rs1760904, rs1713418 and TERC rs12696304, rs35073794, we found no statistically significant differences between subjects older than 44 years with MS and those in the control group (Table 6).
MS - multiple sclerosis; p-value - significance level (statistically significant when p < 0.05), statistically significant results are bold.
Based on binary logistic regression of gene polymorphisms TEP1 rs1760904, rs1713418, and TERC rs12696304, individuals younger than 44 years with MS and the control group had no statistically significant differences. However, TERC rs35073794 is associated with an approximately 3.4-fold decrease in the odds of individuals younger than 44 years with MS under the dominant, overdominant, and additive models (OR: 0.295, (95% CI: 0.173 - 0.503), p < 0.001; OR: 0.295 (95% CI: 0.173 - 0.503), p < 0.001; OR: 0.295 (95% CI: 0.173 - 0.503), p < 0.001, respectively) (Table 7).
Binary logistic regression analysis in individuals over 44 years of age revealed that the TEP1 rs1713418 GG genotype was associated with a 2.2-fold increased odds of MS occurrence in individuals over 44 years of age compared with the AG and AA genotypes (OR: 2.191, (95% CI: 1.020-4.708), p=0.044). However, analysis of polymorphisms of TEP1 rs1760904 and TERC rs12696304, rs35073794 genes between the group of individuals with MS aged ≥44 years and the control group did not reveal statistically significant differences (Table 7).
3.3. Haplotype Analysis of TEP1 (rs1760904, rs1713418) and TERC (rs12696304, rs35073794)
TEP1 rs1760904, rs1713418 SNP Genotype and Haplotype Analysis in MS Patients and Healthy Subjects
The deviation between the expected haplotype and the observed frequency (D') was equal to 0.471. It was also determined that the square of the correlation coefficient of haplotype frequency (r2) was 0.146 (Table 8).
The TEP1 rs1760904-A - rs1713418-A haplotype was the most common in the study group and was therefore selected as a reference. Haplotype analysis revealed that the rs1760904-G - rs1713418-A haplotype was associated with a 1.7-fold increased odds of occurrence of MS (OR: 1.74, (95% CI: 1.18-2.56), p=0.006). In addition, the rs1760904-A - rs1713418-G haplotype is associated with a 1.9-fold increased odds of the MS occurrence (OR: 1.92, (95% CI: 1.14-3.24), p=0.014). The data are presented in Table 9.
According to our calculations, the deviation between the expected haplotype and observed frequency (D') was equal to 0.019. Moreover, the square of the haplotype frequency correlation coefficient (r2) was found to be <0.001 (Table 10).
The TERC rs12696304-C - rs35073794-G haplotype was the most common in the study group and was therefore selected as a reference. Haplotype analysis revealed that the rs12696304-C - rs35073794-A haplotype was associated with a 2-fold reduction in the odds of MS occurrence (OR: 0.51, (95% CI: 0.32-0.84), p=0.008). In addition, the rs12696304-G - rs35073794-A haplotype is associated with a 5.3-fold reduction in the odds of MS occurrence (OR: 0.19, (95% CI: 0.08-0.49), p < 0.001) (Table 11).
4. Discussion
In our study we analyzed the polymorphisms of the TEP1 gene rs1760904, rs1713418, the TERC gene rs12696304, and rs35073794 in 200 MS patients and 230 healthy individuals, because the SNPs we selected have not been studied in scientific research on the pathogenesis and development of MS. It should be noted that aging and genetic variants affecting telomere length, telomerase activation, and telomeric protein configuration can cause functional changes in cells [26,34].
Sipos and co-authors found that TEP1 expression is increased in ulcerative colitis during mild inflammation [35]. Gu and coauthors found that TEP1 rs1713418 AG +AA genotypes were associated with a 1.3-fold increased odds of prostate cancer in individuals younger than ≤69 years compared with the AA genotype (OR: 1.32, (95% CI: 1.02-1.70), p=0.034). However, the AG +GG genotype of the same polymorphism is associated with a 1.4-fold lower odds of prostate cancer in individuals older than > 69 years compared to the AA genotype (OR: 0.71, (95% CI: 0.55-0.92), p=0.010) [26]. Sun et al. found that TEP1 rs1713418 was associated with a 1.3-fold increased odds of ovarian cancer occurrence (OR: 1.33, (95% CI: 1.08-1.65), p=0.009) [36]. It should be noted that excessive or persistent inflammation contributes to carcinogenesis and tumor progression through the activation of inflammatory molecules and signals [37]. Our study found that the TEP1 rs1713418 GG genotype was associated with a 2.2-fold increased odds of MS occurrence in individuals older than 44 years compared with the AG and AA genotypes (OR: 2.191, (95% CI: 1.020-4.708), p=0.044).
Chan and co-authors performed a haplotype analysis and found that the TEP1 haplotype, consisting of the SNP allele variants rs1713418, rs2104978, rs17211355, rs2297615, rs2228041, rs2228026, and rs1713440, was associated with a 2.2-fold increased odds of bladder cancer occurrence (OR: 2.23, (95% CI: 1.13-4.60), p=0.022) [38]. This study revealed that chronic inflammation may play a role in the development of malignancies, including bladder cancer [37]. Our haplotype analysis revealed that the rs1760904-G - rs1713418-A haplotype was statistically significantly associated with a 1.7-fold increased likelihood of developing MS (OR: 1.740, (95% CI: 1.180-2.560), p=0.006). The rs1760904-A - rs1713418-G haplotype is statistically significantly associated with a 1.9-fold increased probability of the occurrence of MS (OR: 1.920, (95% CI: 1.140-3.240), p=0.014).
Liu et al. found that TERC expression was increased more in MS patients than in healthy individuals (p < 0.01) [12]. Scarabino and co-authors found that TERC rs12696304 GG genotype correlated with the occurrence of Alzheimer's disease [18]. In addition, the results of a study conducted by Sun and coauthors suggested that the TERC gene rs12696304 G allele and GG genotype were statistically significantly associated with a 1.6-fold increased odds of developing chronic kidney disease (OR: 1.555, (95% CI: 1.215-1.990), p=0.001; OR: 1.634, (95% CI: 1.201-2.234), p=0.002, respectively). In addition, the researchers found that the G allele of the same polymorphism was associated with a 1.8-fold increased odds of developing chronic kidney disease in the female group (OR:1.816, (95% CI: 1.248-2.641), p=0.002), and the GG genotype was associated with a 2-fold increased odds of developing chronic kidney disease in the female group (OR: 1.959, (95% CI: 1.233-3.114), p= 0.006). The authors also found that the rs12696304 G allele could contribute to a host autoimmune response targeting glomerular tissues by activating the NF-κB pathway via TERC [14]. It is known that secretory renal dysfunction (decreased synthesis of vitamin D, erythropoietin, and Klotho protein) may contribute to brain dysfunction in MS patients [39]. According to the results of Al Khaldu and co-authors, the genotype of TERC gene rs12696304 GG is associated with a 1.6-fold increased probability of developing type 2 diabetes (OR: 1.6, (95% CI: 1.5-1.9), p=0.005) [40]. It should be noted that diabetes, like MS, is associated with increased oxidative stress and inflammatory responses, which may accelerate telomere shortening and associated cellular senescence [41]. After performing binary logistic regression, we found that the TERC gene rs12696304 G allele was associated with a 1.4-fold decrease in the likelihood of occurrence of MS (OR: 0.703, (95% CI: 0.506-0.976), p=0.035). TERC rs12696304 is associated with a decreased probability of occurrence of MS in males in the codominant, dominant, and additive models (5.5-fold (OR: 0.182, (95% CI: 0.037-0.894), p=0.036), 2-fold (OR =0.507, (95% CI: 0.284-0.903), p=0.021) and 1.9-fold (OR: 0.515, (95% CI: 0.314-0.845), p=0.009).
Wu and co-authors found that TERC rs35073794 is associated with a 2.4-fold increased odds of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) occurrence in an allele model (A/G) (OR =2.39, 95% CI = 0.99-5.80, p = 0.047). The authors also found that rs35073794 AG genotype is associated with a 2.6-fold increased odds of RCC risk with adjustment for gender, age and BMI (OR =2.61, 95% CI = 1.01-6.76, p = 0.045) [20]. We found that TERC rs35073794 is associated with about 2.4-fold decreased odds of MS development under codominant, dominant, overdominant, and additive model (OR: 0.408, (95% CI: 0.275 - 0.603), p<0.001; OR: 0.412 (95% CI: 0.279 - 0.610), p<0.001; OR: 0.404 (95% CI: 0.273 - 0.598), p<0.001; OR: 0.427 (95% CI: 0.289 - 0.629), p<0,001, respectively). TERC rs35073794 is associated with about 4.4-fold decreased odds of MS occurrence in men under codominant, dominant, and overdominant model (OR: 0.228, (95% CI: 0.124 - 0.417), p<0.001; OR: 0.233 (95% CI: 0.128 - 0.427), p<0.001; OR: 0.224 (95% CI: 0.122 - 0.410), p<0.001, respectively). Furthermore, TERC rs35073794 each A allele is associated with a 3.9-fold decreased odds of MS occurrence (OR: 0.256, (95% CI: 0.141 - 0.462), p<0.001). TERC rs35073794 is associated with about 3.4-fold decreased odds of subjects younger than 44 years of age with MS under dominant, overdominant and additive model (OR: 0.295, (95% CI: 0.173 - 0.503), p<0.001; OR: 0.295 (95% CI: 0.173 - 0.503), p<0.001; OR: 0.295 (95% CI: 0.173 - 0.503), p<0.001, respectively).
Based on haplotype analysis, Maubaret and colleagues found that the TERC rs12696304-G-rs10936601-T-rs16847897-C haplotype was statistically significantly associated with a 1.35-fold reduction in the risk of developing type 2 diabetes (OR: 0.74, (95% CI: 0.61-0.91), p=0.004) [42]. According to our haplotype analysis, the rs12696304-C-rs35073794-A haplotype is associated with a 2-fold reduction in the likelihood of developing MS (OR: 0.51, (95% CI: 0.32-0.84), p=0.008). In addition, we discovered that the rs12696304-G-rs35073794-A haplotype was associated with a 5.3-fold reduction in the probability of MS occurrence (OR: 0.19, (95% CI: 0.08-0.49), p < 0.001).
In our study, we have several limitations. Sample representativeness: the study rely on a sample of participants, which may not fully represent the diversity of the target population. For more accurate results, the sample size should be increased. The study exhibits strengths in its rigorous methodology, characterized by clear objectives, appropriate sample sizes, and robust data collection. These elements significantly enhance the reliability and validity of our study's findings. Additionally, the study adheres to standardized protocols and procedures, enabling the potential for replication and facilitating comparability with other studies.
There is evidence that telomere-related genes play a critical role in carcinogenesis. However, it is still unclear whether alterations in telomere-related genes may contribute to the progression and occurrence of MS [26]. Therefore, this study warrants further research to explain the pathogenesis of MS and the impact of telomere-related gene alterations on the development of MS.
5. Conclusions
Current evidence may suggest that TERC SNP plays a protective role in the occurrence of MS, whereas TEP1 has the opposite effect, but research is still in the early stages, so it is premature to draw firm conclusions.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, G.R., G.G. and R.L..; methodology, G.G..; validation, G.R., G.G.; formal analysis, G.G., G.R.; investigation, G.R., G.G., R.L.; resources, R.L., L.K.; data curation, G.G; writing—original draft preparation, G.R., G.R., R.L.; writing—review and editing, G.R., G.G., R.B., R.L.; supervision, R.L.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.”
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of LITHUANIAN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES (No. BE-2-102, issued November 14, 2019).
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
the data will be sent upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Yamout, B.I.; Alroughani, R. Multiple sclerosis. Semin. Neurol. 2018, 38, 212–225. [Google Scholar]
- The Multiple Sclerosis International Federation. Atlas of MS 3rd edition 2020.
- Ghasemi, N.; Razavi, S.; Nikzad, E. Multiple sclerosis: Pathogenesis, symptoms, diagnoses and cell-based therapy. Cell J. 2017, 19, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Leffler, J.; Trend, S.; Gorman, S.; Hart, P.H. Sex-Specific Environmental Impacts on Initiation and Progression of Multiple Sclerosis. Front. Neurol. 2022, 13, e835162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hecker, M.; Fitzner, B.; Jäger, K.; Bühring, J.; Schwartz, M.; Hartmann, A.; Walter, M.; Zettl, U.K. Leukocyte Telomere Length in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis and Its Association with Clinical Phenotypes. Mol. Neurobiol. 2021, 58, 2886–2896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baecher-Allan, C.; Kaskow, B.J.; Weiner, H.L. Multiple Sclerosis: Mechanisms and Immunotherapy. Neuron 2018, 97, 742–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Suraweera, N.; Mouradov, D.; Li, S.; Jorissen, R.N.; Hampson, D.; Ghosh, A.; Sengupta, N.; Thaha, M.; Ahmed, S.; Kirwan, M.; et al. Relative telomere lengths in tumor and normal mucosa are related to disease progression and chromosome instability profiles in colorectal cancer. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 36474–36488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Razgonova, M.P.; Zakharenko, A.M.; Golokhvast, K.S.; Thanasoula, M.; Sarandi, E.; Nikolouzakis, K.; Fragkiadaki, P.; Tsoukalas, D.; Spandidos, D.A.; Tsatsakis, A. Telomerase and telomeres in aging theory and chronographic aging theory. Mol. Med. Rep. 2020, 22, 1679–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Melicher, D.; Buzas, E.I.; Falus, A. Genetic and epigenetic trends in telomere research: A novel way in immunogenetics. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2015, 72, 4095–4109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Giardini, M.A.; Segatto, M.; da Silva, M.S.; Nunes, V.S.; Cano, M.I.N. Telomere and Telomerase Biology. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2014, 125, 1–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zheng, Q.; Huang, J.; Wang, G. Mitochondria, Telomeres and Telomerase Subunits. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2019, 7, 274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, H.; Yang, Y.; Ge, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhao, Y. TERC promotes cellular inflammatory response independent of telomerase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, 8084–8095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gomez-Delgado, F.; Delgado-Lista, J.; Lopez-Moreno, J.; Rangel-Zuniga, O.A.; Alcala-Diaz, J.F.; Leon-Acuna, A.; et al. Telomerase RNA component genetic variants interact with the mediterranean diet modifying the inflammatory status and its relationship with aging. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2018, 73, 327–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sun, Q.; Liu, J.; Cheng, G.; Dai, M.; Liu, J.; Qi, Z.; Zhao, J.; Li, W.; Kong, F.; Liu, G.; et al. The telomerase gene polymorphisms, but not telomere length, increase susceptibility to primary glomerulonephritis/end stage renal diseases in females. J. Transl. Med. 2020, 18, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gala, K.; Khattar, E. Long non-coding RNAs at work on telomeres: Functions and implications in cancer therapy. Cancer Lett. 2021, 502, 120–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yuan, B.; Wen, X.; Li, L.; Li, Y.; Li, C.; Li, B.; et al. NAF1 rs4691896 is significantly associated with coal workers' pneumoconiosis in a Chinese Han population. Med. Sci. Monit. 2020, 26, e918709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, M.-Y.; Nemes, A.; Zhou, Q.-G. The Emerging Roles for Telomerase in the Central Nervous System. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2018, 11, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Scarabino, D.; Broggio, E.; Gambina, G.; Pelliccia, F.; Corbo, R. Common variants of human TERT and TERC genes and susceptibility to sporadic Alzheimers disease. Exp. Gerontol. 2017, 88, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jones, A.M.; Beggs, A.D.; Carvajal-Carmona, L.; Farrington, S.; Tenesa, A.; Walker, M.; et al. TERC polymorphisms are associated both with susceptibility to colorectal cancer and with longer telomeres. Gut 2012, 61, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, D.; Zhu, G.; Zeng, J.; Song, W.; Wang, K.; Wang, X.; Guo, P.; He, D. Genetic variations in TERC and TERT genes are associated with renal cell carcinoma risk in a Chinese Han population. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 76832–76842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sawhney, V.; Brouilette, S.; Campbell, N.; Coppen, S.; Baker, V.; Hunter, R.; Dhinoja, M.; Johnston, A.; Earley, M.; Sporton, S.; et al. Association of genetic variation in telomere-related SNP and telomerase with ventricular arrhythmias in ischemic cardiomyopathy. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 2018, 41, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morrish, T.A. Telomerase and Non-Telomerase Mechanisms of Telomere Maintenance; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Duan, X.; Wang, H.; Yang, Y.; Wang, P.; Zhang, H.; Liu, B.; Wei, W.; Yao, W.; Zhou, X.; Zhao, J.; et al. Genetic variants in telomerase-associated protein 1 are associated with telomere damage in PAH-exposed workers. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 223, e112558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Zhao, L.; Yang, Z.; Funder, J.W.; Liu, J.P. Telomerase is controlled by protein kinase calpha in human breast cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 33436–33442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, J.; Pellegrini, M.V. Biochemistry, telomere and telomerase. StatPearls: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Gu, C.; Li, Q.; Zhu, Y.; Qu, Y.; Zhang, G.; Wang, M.; Yang, Y.; Wang, J.; Jin, L.; Wei, Q.; et al. Genetic variants in the TEP1 gene are associated with prostate cancer risk and recurrence. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2015, 18, 310–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jin, D.-H.; Kim, S.; Kim, D.-H.; Park, J. Two genetic variants in telomerase-associated protein 1 are associated with stomach cancer risk. J. Hum. Genet. 2016, 61, 885–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Data about TEP1 Gene from NCBI. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/7011 (accessed on 27 April 2022).
- Ren, H.Y.; Wang, Q.; Lei, W.; Zhang, C.C.; Li, Y.F.; Li, X.J.; Li, M.L.; Deng, W.; Huang, C.H.; Du, F.; et al. The common variants implicated in microstructural abnormality of first episode and drug-naive patients with schizophrenia. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, e11750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sebate, B.; Cuttler, K.; Cloete, R.; Britz, M.; Christoffels, A.; Williams, M.; Carr, J.; Bardien, S. Prioritization of candidate genes for a South African family with Parkinson’s disease using in-silico tools. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0249324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Farsani, Z.S.; Dehghanzad, R.; Moghadam, S.P. Prediction of single-nucleotide polymorphisms within microRNAs binding sites of neuronal genes related to multiple sclerosis. Adv. Biomed. Res. 2021, 10, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Filippi, M.; Rocca, M.A.; Ciccarelli, O.; De Stefano, N.; Evangelou, N.; Kappos, L.; Rovira, A.; Sastre-Garriga, J.; Tintorè, M.; Frederiksen, J.L.; et al. MRI criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: MAGNIMS consensus guidelines. Lancet Neurol. 2016, 15, 292–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thompson, A.J.; Banwell, B.L.; Barkhof, F.; Carroll, W.M.; Coetzee, T.; Comi, G.; et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2018, 17, 162–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chang, J.T.-C.; Chen, Y.-L.; Yang, H.-T.; Chen, C.-Y.; Cheng, A.-J. Differential regulation of telomerase activity by six telomerase subunits. Eur. J. Biochem. 2002, 269, 3442–3450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sipos, F.; Galamb, O.; Herszényi, L.; Molnár, B.; Solymosi, N.; Zágoni, T.; Berczi, L.; Tulassay, Z. Elevated insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor, hepatocyte growth factor receptor and telomerase protein expression in mild ulcerative colitis. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2008, 43, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sun, Y.; Tao, W.; Huang, M.; Wu, X.; Gu, J. Genetic variants in telomere-maintenance genes are associated with ovarian cancer risk and outcome. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2017, 21, 510–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sui, X.; Lei, L.; Chen, L.; Xie, T.; Li, X. Inflammatory microenvironment in the initiation and progression of bladder cancer. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 93279–93294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chang, J.; Dinney, C.P.; Huang, M.; Wu, X.; Gu, J. Genetic Variants in Telomere-Maintenance Genes and Bladder Cancer Risk. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e30665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rostami, S.; Aleagha, M.S.E.; Ghasemi-Kasman, M.; Allameh, A. Cross-talks between the kidneys and the central nervous system in multiple sclerosis. Casp. J. Intern. Med. 2018, 9, 206–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al Khaldi, R.; Mojiminiyi, O.; AlMulla, F.; Abdella, N. Associations of TERC single nucleotide polymorphisms with human leukocyte telomere length and the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0145721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhou, Y.; Ning, Z.; Lee, Y.; Hambly, B.D.; McLachlan, C.S. Shortened leukocyte telomere length in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Genetic polymorphisms in mitochondrial uncoupling proteins and telomeric pathways. Clin. Transl. Med. 2016, 5, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maubaret, C.G.; Salpea, K.D.; Romanoski, C.E.; Folkersen, L.; Cooper, J.A.; Stephanou, C.; Li, K.W.; Palmen, J.; Hamsten, A.; Neil, A.; et al. Association of TERC and OBFC1 Haplotypes with Mean Leukocyte Telomere Length and Risk for Coronary Heart Disease. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e83122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1.
Demographic characteristics of the study groups.
| Characteristics | Group | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS group | Control group | |||
| Gender | Males, N (%) | 102 (51) | 97 (42.2) | 0.067 |
| Females, N (%) | 98 (49) | 133 (57.8) | ||
| Age, Median (IQR) | 38 (15) | 43.5 (28) | 0.117 | |
IQR - interquartile range; MS - multiple sclerosis; p-significance level.
Table 2.
Distribution of TEP1 rs1760904, rs1713418, TERC rs12696304, rs35073794 genotypes and alleles within patients with MS and control group subjects.
Table 2.
Distribution of TEP1 rs1760904, rs1713418, TERC rs12696304, rs35073794 genotypes and alleles within patients with MS and control group subjects.
| Gene, SNP | Genotype and allele | Distribution | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS group, N (%) | Control group, N (%) | p-value | ||
| TEP1 rs1760904 | Genotype AA AG GG |
44 (22.00) 96 (48.00) 60 (30.00) |
56 (24.30) 122 (53.00) 52 (22.60) |
0.219 |
| Allele A G |
184 (46.00) 216 (54.00) |
234 (50.87) 226 (49.13) |
0.154 | |
| TEP1 rs1713418 | Genotype AA AG GG |
72 (36.00) 86 (43.00) 42 (21.00) |
81 (35.20) 114 (49.60) 35 (15.20) |
0.222 |
| Allele A G |
230 (57.50) 170 (42.50) |
276 (60.00) 184 (40.00) |
0.457 | |
| TERC rs12696304 | Genotype CC CG GG |
124 (62.00) 70 (35.00) 6 (3.00) |
123 (53.50) 92 (40.00) 15 (6.50) |
0.092 |
| Allele C G |
318 (79.50) 82 (20.50) |
338 (73.48) 122 (26.52) |
0.038 | |
| TERC rs35073794 | Genotype GG AG AA |
108 (54.00)1 91 (45.50)2 1 (0.50) |
75 (32.60)1 155 (67.40)2 0 (0.00) |
<0.001 |
| Allele G A |
307 (76.75) 93 (23.25) |
305 (66.30) 155 (33.70) |
<0.001 | |
SNP - single nucleotide polymorphism; MS - multiple sclerosis; p-value - significance level (statistically significant when p < 0.05), statistically significant results are bold. 1GG vs. AG+AA p<0.001. 2AG vs. GG+AA p<0.001.
Table 3.
Binary logistic regression analysis of TEP1 rs1760904, rs1713418, TERC rs12696304, rs35073794 within patients with MS and control group subjects.
Table 3.
Binary logistic regression analysis of TEP1 rs1760904, rs1713418, TERC rs12696304, rs35073794 within patients with MS and control group subjects.
| Model | Genotype/Allele | OR (95% CI) | p-value | AIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEP1 rs1760904 | ||||
| Codominant | AG vs. AA GG vs. AA |
1.001 (0.622 - 1.613) 1.469 (0.854 - 2.525) |
0.995 0.165 |
594.983 |
| Dominant | AG + GG vs. AA | 1.141 (0.727 - 1.790) | 0.566 | 595.681 |
| Recessive | GG vs. AG + AA | 1.467 (0.952 - 2.260) | 0.082 | 592.983 |
| Overdominant | AG vs. AA+GG | 0.817 (0.559 - 1.194) | 0.297 | 594.923 |
| Additive | G | 1.220 (0.930 - 1.600) | 0.152 | 593.947 |
| TEP1 rs1713418 | ||||
| Codominant | AG vs. AA GG vs. AA |
0.849 (0.556 - 1.296) 1.350 (0.779 - 2.339) |
0.447 0.284 |
595.007 |
| Dominant | AG + GG vs. AA | 0.966 (0.651 - 1.436) | 0.866 | 595.983 |
| Recessive | GG vs. AG+AA | 1.481 (0.903 - 2.430) | 0.120 | 593.584 |
| Overdominant | AG vs. AA+GG | 0.768 (0.524 - 1.124) | 0.174 | 594.156 |
| Additive | G | 1.104 (0.845 - 1.443) | 0.466 | 595.481 |
| TERC rs12696304 | ||||
| Codominant | CG vs. CC GG vs. CC |
0.755 (0.507 - 1.124) 0.397 (0.149 - 1.056) |
0.166 0.064 |
593.121 |
| Dominant | CG+GG vs. CC | 0.705 (0.479 - 1.036) | 0.075 | 592.826 |
| Recessive | GG vs. CG+CC | 0.443 (0.169 - 1.165) | 0.099 | 593.043 |
| Overdominant | CG vs. CC+GG | 0.808 (0.546 - 1.196) | 0.286 | 594.871 |
| Additive | G | 0.703 (0.506 - 0.976) | 0.035 | 591.502 |
| TERC rs35073794 | ||||
| Codominant | AG vs. GG AA vs. GG |
0.408 (0.275 - 0.603) - |
<0.001 - |
575.893 |
| Dominant | AG + AA vs. GG | 0.412 (0.279 - 0.610) | <0.001 | 575.875 |
| Recessive | AA vs. AG+GG | - | - | - |
| Overdominant | AG vs. AA+GG | 0.404 (0.273 - 0.598) | <0.001 | 574.944 |
| Additive | A | 0.427 (0.289 - 0.629 | <0.001 | 577.123 |
OR - odds ratio; CI - confidence interval; p-value - significance level (statistically significant when p < 0.05); statistically significant results are bold; AIC - Akaike information criterion.
Table 4.
Distribution of TEP1 rs1760904, rs1713418, TERC rs12696304, rs35073794 genotypes and alleles within patients with MS and control group subjects regarding gender.
Table 4.
Distribution of TEP1 rs1760904, rs1713418, TERC rs12696304, rs35073794 genotypes and alleles within patients with MS and control group subjects regarding gender.
| Genotype and Allele. | Males | p-value | Females | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS group, N (%) | Control group, N (%) | MS group, N (%) | Control group, N (%) | |||
| TEP1 rs1760904 | ||||||
| Genotype AA AG GG |
25 (24.50) 50 (49.00) 27 (26.50) |
28 (28.90) 51 (52.60) 18 (18.60) |
0.395 | 19 (19.40) 46 (46.90) 33 (33.70) |
28 (21.10) 71 (53.40) 34 (25.60) |
0.403 |
| Allele A G |
100 (49.02) 104 (50.98) |
107 (55.15) 87 (44.85) |
0.221 | 84 (42.86) 112 (57.14) |
127 (47.74) 139 (52.26) |
0.297 |
| TEP1 rs1713418 | ||||||
| Genotype AA AG GG |
40 (39.20) 46 (45.10) 16 (15.70) |
32 (33.00) 52 (53.60) 13 (13.40) |
0.486 | 32 (32.70) 40 (40.80) 26 (26.50) |
49 (36.80) 62 (46.60) 22 (16.50) |
0.181 |
| Allele A G |
126 (61.76) 78 (38.24) |
116 (59.79) 78 (40.21) |
0.687 | 104 (53.06) 92 (46.94) |
160 (60.15) 106 (39.85) |
0.128 |
| TERC rs12696304 | ||||||
| Genotype CC CG GG |
70 (68.60)1 30 (29.40) 2 (2.00)2 |
51 (52.60)1 38 (39.20) 8 (8.20)2 |
0.025 |
54 (55.10) 40 (40.80) 4 (4.10) |
72 (54.10) 54 (40.60) 7 (5.30) |
0.916 |
| Allele C G |
170 (83.33) 34 (16.67) |
140 (72.16) 54 (27.84) |
0.007 | 148 (75.51) 48 (24.49) |
198 (74.44) 68 (25.56) |
0.792 |
| TERC rs35073794 | ||||||
| Genotype GG AG AA |
61 (59.80)3 40 (39.20)4 1 (1.00) |
25 (25.80)3 72 (74.20)4 0 (0.00) |
<0.001 | 47 (48.00) 51 (52.00) |
50 (37.60) 83 (62.40) |
0.115 |
| Allele G A |
162 (79.41) 42 (20.59) |
122 (62.89) 72 (37.11) |
<0.001 | 145 (73.98) 51 (26.02) |
183 (68.80) 83 (31.20) |
0.225 |
MS - multiple sclerosis; p-value - significance level (statistically significant when p < 0.05), statistically significant results are bold. 1CC vs. CG+GG p= 0.020. 2GG vs. CG+CC p=0.043. 3GG vs. AG+AA p<0.001. 4AG vs. GG+AA p<0.001.
Table 5.
Binary logistic regression analysis of TEP1 rs1760904, rs1713418, TERC rs12696304, rs35073794 within patients with MS and control group subjects regarding gender.
Table 5.
Binary logistic regression analysis of TEP1 rs1760904, rs1713418, TERC rs12696304, rs35073794 within patients with MS and control group subjects regarding gender.
| Model | Genotype/Allele | OR (95% CI) | p-value | AIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Males | ||||
| TEP1 rs1760904 | ||||
| Codominant | AG vs. AA GG vs. AA |
1.098 (0.564 - 2.136) 1.680 (0.752 - 3.754) |
0.783 0.206 |
277.881 |
| Dominant | AG + GG vs. AA | 1.250 (0.666 - 2.346) | 0.488 | 277.264 |
| Recessive | GG vs. AG + AA | 1.580 (0.805 - 3.103) | 0.184 | 275.956 |
| Overdominant | AG vs. AA+GG | 0.867 (0.497 - 1.513) | 0.616 | 277.495 |
| Additive | G | 1.286 (0.862 - 1.918) | 0.218 | 276.218 |
| TEP1 rs1713418 | ||||
| Codominant | AG vs. AA GG vs. AA |
0.708 (0.384 - 1.304) 0.985 (0.414 - 2.343) |
0.267 0.972 |
278.303 |
| Dominant | AG + GG vs. AA | 0.763 (0.427 - 1.364) | 0.361 | 276.911 |
| Recessive | GG vs. AG+AA | 1.202 (0.545 - 2.652) | 0.648 | 277.538 |
| Overdominant | AG vs. AA+GG | 0.711 (0.407 - 1.242) | 0.231 | 276.305 |
| Additive | G | 0.918 (0.609 - 1.383) | 0.682 | 277.579 |
| TERC rs12696304 | ||||
| Codominant | CG vs. CC GG vs. CC |
0.575 (0.316 - 1.047) 0.182 (0.037 - 0.894) |
0.071 0.036 |
272.078 |
| Dominant | CG+GG vs. CC | 0.507 (0.284 - 0.903) | 0.021 | 272.350 |
| Recessive | GG vs. CG+CC | 0.223 (0.046 - 1.075) | 0.062 | 273.377 |
| Overdominant | CG vs. CC+GG | 0.647 (0.359 - 1.167) | 0.148 | 275.637 |
| Additive | G | 0.515 (0.314 - 0.845) | 0.009 | 270.497 |
| TERC rs35073794 | ||||
| Codominant | AG vs. GG AA vs. GG |
0.228 (0.124 - 0.417) - |
<0.001 - |
253.671 |
| Dominant | AG + AA vs. GG | 0.233 (0.128 - 0.427) | <0.001 | 253.714 |
| Recessive | AA vs. AG+GG | - | - | - |
| Overdominant | AG vs. AA+GG | 0.224 (0.122 - 0.410) | <0.001 | 252.353 |
| Additive | A | 0.256 (0.141 - 0.462) | <0.001 | 255.882 |
| Females | ||||
| TEP1 rs1760904 | ||||
| Codominant | AG vs. AA GG vs. AA |
0.955 (0.479 - 1.905) 1.430 (0.673 - 3.041) |
0.896 0.352 |
317.102 |
| Dominant | AG + GG vs. AA | 1.109 (0.578 - 2.127) | 0.756 | 316.814 |
| Recessive | GG vs. AG + AA | 1.478 (0.834 - 2.619) | 0.181 | 315.119 |
| Overdominant | AG vs. AA+GG | 0.772 (0.458 - 1.303) | 0.333 | 315.972 |
| Additive | G | 1.224 (0.840 - 1.784) | 0.293 | 315.798 |
| TEP1 rs1713418 | ||||
| Codominant | AG vs. AA GG vs. AA |
0.988 (0.544 - 1.795) 1.810 (0.879 - 3.724) |
0.968 0.107 |
315.523 |
| Dominant | AG + GG vs. AA | 1.203 (0.694 - 2.085) | 0.510 | 316.474 |
| Recessive | GG vs. AG+AA | 1.822 (0.960 - 3.457) | 0.066 | 313.525 |
| Overdominant | AG vs. AA+GG | 0.790 (0.466 - 1.339) | 0.381 | 316.139 |
| Additive | G | 1.302 (0.911 - 1.862) | 0.148 | 314.801 |
| TERC rs12696304 | ||||
| Codominant | CG vs. CC GG vs. CC |
0.988 (0.576 - 1.695) 0.762 (0.212 - 2.735) |
0.964 0.677 |
318.732 |
| Dominant | CG+GG vs. CC | 0.962 (0.569 - 1.624) | 0.884 | 316.889 |
| Recessive | GG vs. CG+CC | 0.766 (0.218 - 2.693) | 0.678 | 316.734 |
| Overdominant | CG vs. CC+GG | 1.009 (0.593 - 1.716) | 0.974 | 316.909 |
| Additive | G | 0.940 (0.602 - 1.466) | 0.784 | 316.835 |
| TERC rs35073794 | ||||
| Codominant | AG vs. GG AA vs. GG |
- - |
- - |
- |
| Dominant | AG + AA vs. GG | 0.654 (0.385 - 1.110) | 0.115 | 314.425 |
| Recessive | AA vs. AG+GG | - | - | - |
| Overdominant | AG vs. AA+GG | 0.654 (0.385 - 1.110) | 0.115 | 314.425 |
| Additive | A | 0.654 (0.385 - 1.110) | 0.115 | 314.425 |
OR - odds ratio; CI - confidence interval; p-value - significance level (statistically significant when p < 0.05); statistically significant results are bold; AIC - Akaike information criterion.
Table 6.
Distribution of TEP1 rs1760904, rs1713418, TERC rs12696304, rs35073794 genotypes and alleles within patients with MS and control group subjects regarding age.
Table 6.
Distribution of TEP1 rs1760904, rs1713418, TERC rs12696304, rs35073794 genotypes and alleles within patients with MS and control group subjects regarding age.
| Genotype and Allele | <44 | p-value |
 44 |
p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS group, N (%) | Control group, N (%) | MS group, N (%) | Control group, N (%) | |||
| TEP1 rs1760904 | ||||||
| Genotype AA AG GG |
28 (20.70) 64 (47.40) 43 (31.90) |
27 (23.50) 59 (51.30) 29 (25.20) |
0.509 | 16 (24.60) 32 (49.20) 17 (26.20) |
29 (25.20) 63 (54.80) 23 (20.00) |
0.620 |
| Allele A G |
120 (44.44) 150 (55.56) |
113 (49.13) 117 (50.87) |
0.295 | 64 (49.23) 66 (50.77) |
121 (52.61) 109 (47.39) |
0.538 |
| TEP1 rs1713418 | ||||||
| Genotype AA AG GG |
54 (40.00) 56 (41.50) 25 (18.50) |
41 (35.70) 55 (47.80) 19 (16.50) |
0.603 | 18 (27.70) 30 (46.20) 17 (26.20) |
40 (34.80) 59 (51.30) 16 (13.90) |
0.119 |
| Allele A G |
164 (60.74) 106 (39.26) |
137 (59.57) 93 (40.43) |
0.789 | 66 (50.77) 64 (49.23) |
139 (60.43) 91 (39.57) |
0.075 |
| TERC rs12696304 | ||||||
| Genotype CC CG GG |
87 (64.40) 45 (33.30) 3 (2.20) |
63 (54.80) 47 (40.90) 5 (4.30) |
0.246 | 37 (56.90) 25 (38.50) 3 (4.60) |
60 (52.20) 45 (39.10) 10 (8.70) |
0.567 |
| Allele C G |
219 (81.11) 51 (18.89) |
173 (75.22) 57 (24.78) |
0.110 | 99 (76.15) 31 (23.85) |
165 (71.74) 65 (28.26) |
0.363 |
| TERC rs35073794 | ||||||
| Genotype AA AG GG |
60 (44.40) 75 (55.60) |
84 (73.00) 31 (27.00) |
<0.001 | 1 (1.50) 31 (47.70) 33 (50.80) |
0 (0.00) 71 (61.70) 44 (38.30) |
0.094 |
| Allele A G |
60 (22.22) 210 (77.78) |
84 (36.52) 146 (63.48) |
<0.001 | 33 (25.39) 97 (74.61) |
71 (30.87) 159 (69.13) |
0.270 |
MS - multiple sclerosis; p-value - significance level (statistically significant when p < 0.05), statistically significant results are bold.
Table 7.
Binary logistic regression analysis of TEP1 rs1760904, rs1713418, TERC rs12696304, rs35073794 within patients with MS and control group subjects regarding age.
Table 7.
Binary logistic regression analysis of TEP1 rs1760904, rs1713418, TERC rs12696304, rs35073794 within patients with MS and control group subjects regarding age.
| Model | Genotype/Allele | OR (95% CI) | p-Value | AIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <44 | ||||
| TEP1 rs1760904 | ||||
| Codominant | AG vs. AA GG vs. AA |
1.046 (0.554 - 1.976) 1.430 (0.704 - 2.902) |
0.890 0.322 |
347.612 |
| Dominant | AG + GG vs. AA | 1.172 (0.644 - 2.135) | 0.603 | 346.701 |
| Recessive | GG vs. AG + AA | 1.386 (0.796 - 2.415) | 0.249 | 345.632 |
| Overdominant | AG vs. AA+GG | 0.856 (0.520 - 1.408) | 0.539 | 346.594 |
| Additive | G | 1.205 (0.848 - 1.713) | 0.299 | 345.887 |
| TEP1 rs1713418 | ||||
| Codominant | AG vs. AA GG vs. AA |
0.773 (0.446 - 1.341) 0.999 (0.486 - 2.056) |
0.360 0.998 |
347.959 |
| Dominant | AG + GG vs. AA | 0.831 (0.497 - 1.390) | 0.480 | 346.473 |
| Recessive | GG vs. AG+AA | 1.148 (0.596 - 2.214) | 0.680 | 346.801 |
| Overdominant | AG vs. AA+GG | 0.773 (0.469 - 1.276) | 0.315 | 345.959 |
| Additive | G | 0.955 (0.675 - 1.351) | 0.796 | 346.905 |
| TERC rs12696304 | ||||
| Codominant | CG vs. CC GG vs. CC |
0.693 (0.411 - 1.168) 0.434 (0.100 - 1.885) |
0.169 0.266 |
346.168 |
| Dominant | CG+GG vs. CC | 0.668 (0.402 - 1.112) | 0.121 | 344.557 |
| Recessive | GG vs. CG+CC | 0.500 (0.117 - 2.139) | 0.350 | 346.065 |
| Overdominant | CG vs. CC+GG | 0.723 (0.432 - 1.212) | 0.219 | 345.457 |
| Additive | G | 0.682 (0.435 - 1.071) | 0.097 | 344.182 |
| TERC rs35073794 | ||||
| Codominant | AG vs. GG AA vs. GG |
- - |
- - |
- |
| Dominant | AG + AA vs. GG | 0.295 (0.173 - 0.503) | <0.001 | 325.726 |
| Recessive | AA vs. AG+GG | - | - | - |
| Overdominant | AG vs. AA+GG | 0.295 (0.173 - 0.503) | <0.001 | 325.726 |
| Additive | A | 0.295 (0.173 - 0.503) | <0.001 | 325.726 |
 44 | ||||
| TEP1 rs1760904 | ||||
| Codominant | AG vs. AA GG vs. AA |
0.921 (0.437 - 1.937) 1.340 (0.558 - 3.214) |
0.828 0.512 |
238.517 |
| Dominant | AG + GG vs. AA | 1.033 (0.511 - 2.088) | 0.929 | 237.452 |
| Recessive | GG vs. AG + AA | 1.417 (0.691 - 2.903) | 0.341 | 236.564 |
| Overdominant | AG vs. AA+GG | 0.800 (0.435 - 1.472) | 0.474 | 236.946 |
| Additive | G | 1.154 (0.741 - 1.799) | 0.526 | 237.057 |
| TEP1 rs1713418 | ||||
| Codominant | AG vs. AA GG vs. AA |
1.130 (0.556 - 2.296) 2.361 (0.979 - 5.696) |
0.736 0.056 |
235.321 |
| Dominant | AG + GG vs. AA | 1.393 (0.716 - 2.708) | 0.329 | 236.492 |
| Recessive | GG vs. AG+AA | 2.191 (1.020 - 4.708) | 0.044 | 233.436 |
| Overdominant | AG vs. AA+GG | 0.814 (0.442 - 1.497) | 0.507 | 237.019 |
| Additive | G | 1.492 (0.959 - 2.320) | 0.076 | 234.263 |
| TERC rs12696304 | ||||
| Codominant | CG vs. CC GG vs. CC |
0.901 (0.476 - 1.705) 0.486 (0.126 - 1.884) |
0.748 0.297 |
238.256 |
| Dominant | CG+GG vs. CC | 0.826 (0.448 - 1.523) | 0.539 | 237.082 |
| Recessive | GG vs. CG+CC | 0.508 (0.135 - 1.917) | 0.318 | 236.359 |
| Overdominant | CG vs. CC+GG | 0.972 (0.521 - 1.815) | 0.930 | 237.452 |
| Additive | G | 0.795 (0.485 - 1.305) | 0.365 | 236.627 |
| TERC rs35073794 | ||||
| Codominant | AG vs. GG AA vs. GG |
0.582 (0.314 - 1.080) - |
0.086 - |
234.455 |
| Dominant | AG + AA vs. GG | 0.601 (0.325 - 1.111) | 0.104 | 234.814 |
| Recessive | AA vs. AG+GG | - | - | - |
| Overdominant | AG vs. AA+GG | 0.565 (0.305 - 1.045) | 0.069 | 234.132 |
| Additive | A | 0.650 (0.356 - 1.190) | 0.163 | 235.502 |
OR - odds ratio; CI - confidence interval; p-value - significance level (statistically significant when p < 0.05); statistically significant results are bold; AIC - Akaike information criterion.
Table 8.
Linkage disequilibrium between TEP1 rs1760904 and rs1713418 polymorphisms in patients with MS and control group.
Table 8.
Linkage disequilibrium between TEP1 rs1760904 and rs1713418 polymorphisms in patients with MS and control group.
| SNP | MS group vs. Control group | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| D' | r2 | p-value | |
| rs1760904 - rs1713418 | 0.471 | 0.146 | 0.000 |
SNP - single nucleotide polymorphism; MS - multiple sclerosis; D' - the deviation between the expected and observed haplotype frequency; r² - the haplotype frequency correlation coefficient square; p-value - significance level (statistically significant when p < 0.05).
Table 9.
Haplotype association with the predisposition to MS occurrence.
| Haplotype | TEP1rs1760904 | TEP1rs1713418 | Frequency, % | OR (95% CI) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | MS | |||||
| 1 | A | A | 42.81 | 32.53 | 1.000 | - |
| 2 | G | G | 31.94 | 29.03 | 1.140 (0.820 - 1.600) | 0.430 |
| 3 | G | A | 17.19 | 24.97 | 1.740 (1.180 - 2.560) | 0.006 |
| 4 | A | G | 8.06 | 13.47 | 1.920 (1.140 - 3.240) | 0.014 |
MS - multiple sclerosis; OR - odds ratio; CI - confidence interval; p-value - significance level (statistically significant when p < 0.05); statistically significant results are bold.
Table 10.
Linkage disequilibrium between TERC rs12696304 and rs35073794 polymorphisms in patients with MS and control group.
Table 10.
Linkage disequilibrium between TERC rs12696304 and rs35073794 polymorphisms in patients with MS and control group.
| SNP | MS group vs. Control group | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| D' | r2 | p-value | |
| rs12696304 - rs35073794 | 0.019 | <0.001 | 0.631 |
SNP - single nucleotide polymorphism; MS - multiple sclerosis; D' - the deviation between the expected and observed haplotype frequency; r² - the haplotype frequency correlation coefficient square; p-value - significance level (statistically significant when p < 0.05).
Table 11.
Haplotype association with the predisposition to MS occurrence.
| Haplotype | TERC rs12696304 | TERCrs35073794 | Frequency, % | OR (95% CI) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | MS | |||||
| 1 | C | G | 50.48 | 59.55 | 1.000 | - |
| 2 | C | A | 22.99 | 19.95 | 0.510 (0.320 - 0.840) | 0.008 |
| 3 | G | G | 15.82 | 17.20 | 0.870 (0.540 - 1.390) | 0.550 |
| 4 | G | A | 10.70 | 3.30 | 0.190 (0.080 - 0.490) | <0.001 |
MS - multiple sclerosis; OR - odds ratio; CI - confidence interval; p-value - significance level (statistically significant when p < 0.05); statistically significant results are bold.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
