Submitted:
18 August 2023
Posted:
22 August 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Safety control of LPa 12/1 strain using BALB/c mice
2.2. LPa 12/1 strain encapsulation process (dry freezing)
2.3. Surviving and stability of encapsulated strain LPa 12/1 in ewe-goat milk yoghurt
2.4. Surviving and stability of encapsulated strain LPa 12/1 in cow milk yoghurt
2.5. Bacteriocin substance preparing and inhibitory activity testing
3. Results
3.1. Safety control of LPa 12/1 strain
3.2. Stability and surviving of LPa 12/1 strain in ewe-goat milk yoghurts
3.3. Stability and surviving of LPa 12/1 strain in cow milk yoghurts
3.4. Bacteriocin activity and stability
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Yami, A.; Merkel, R.C. Compositional and technological properties of goat milk and milk products A review. Con. Dairy & Vet.Sci, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vaquil, Rekha Rathee. A review on Health promoting aspects of goat milk. Pharma Innov. 2017, 6, 05–08. [Google Scholar]
- Lauková, A.; Focková, V.; Pogány Simonová, M. Enterococcus mundtii isolated from Slovak raw goat milk and its bacteriocinogenic potential. Int. J. Environ. Res. Pub. Health 2020, 17, 9504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lad, S.S.; Aparnathi, K.D.; Mehta, B.; Velpula, S. Goat milk in human nutrition and health-a review. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2017, 6, 1781–1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lauková, A.; Micenková, L.; Grešáková, Ľ.; Maďarová, M.; Pogány Simonová, M.; Focková, V.; Ščerbová, J. Microbiome associated with Slovak raw goat milk, trace minerals, and vitamin E content. Int. J. Food Sci, 4595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quigley, L.; O Sullivan, O.; Stanton, C.; Beresford, T.P.; Ross, R.P. The complex microbiota of raw milk. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2013, 37, 664–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lauková, A.; Pogány Simonová, M.; Tomáška, M.; Kološta, M.; Drončovský, M.; Dvorožňáková, E. Lacticaseibacilli and lactococci from Slovak raw goat milk and their potential. Sci.Agri. Bohemica 2021, 52, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klapáčová, L.; Greif, G.; Greifová, M.; Tomáška, M.; Hanuš, O.; Dudríková, E. Antimicrobially active lactobacilli from goats milk that do not produce biogenic amines. J. Food Nutr. Res. 2015, 54, 270–274. [Google Scholar]
- Tolinački, M. ; Kojič,M.; Lozo, J.; Teržič-Vidojevič, A.; Topisarovič, L.; Fira, D. Characterization of the bacteriocin-producing strain Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei BGUB9. Arch. Biol. Sci. Belgrade. [CrossRef]
- Strompfová, V.; Marciňáková, M.; Simonová, M.; Bogovič-Matijašič, B.; Lauková, A. Application of potential probiotic Lactobacillus fermentum AD1 strain in healthy dogs. Anaerobe 2006, 12, 75–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dvorožňáková, E.; Vargová, M.; Hurníková, Z.; Lauková, A.; Revajová, V. Modulation of lymphocyte subpopulations in the small intestine of mice treated with probiotic bacterial strains and infected with Trichinella spiralis. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 132, 4430–4439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vetvička, V.; Fornousek, L.; Kopeček, J.; Kamínková, J.; Kašpárek, L.; Vránová, M. Phagocytosis of human blood leucocytes, a simple micro-method. Immunol. Lett. 1982, 5, 97–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nataraj Basavaprabhu, H. ; Syed Azmal Ali; Pradip V. Betore; Harim Yadav. Postbiotics-parabiotics:the new horizon in microbial biotherapy and functional food. Microb. Cell. Fac, 19. [CrossRef]
- Lauková, A.; Tomáška, M.; Fraqueza, M.J.; Szabóová, R.; Bino, E.; Ščerbová, J.; Pogány Simonová, M.; Dvorožňáková, E. Bacteriocin-producing strain Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LP17L/1 isolated from traditional stored ewes milk cheese and its beneficial potential. Foods 2022, 11, 959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Smokvina, T.; Wels, M.; Polka, J.; Chervaux, Ch. Brisse, S.; Boekhorst, J.; Vlieg, J.E.; van Hylckama, T.; Siezen, R.J.; Highlander, S.K. Lactobacillus paracasei comparative genomics: Towards species pan-genome definition and exploitation of diversity. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8, E68731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orlando, A.; Refolo, M.G.; Messa, C.; Amati, L.; Lavermicocca, P.; Guerra, V.; Russo, F. Antiproliferative and proapoptic effects of viable or heat-killed IMPC2.1 and GG in HGC-27 gastric and DLD-1 colon cell lines. Nutr. Canc, 1103; 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lauková, A.; Strompfová, V. , Ouwehand, A. Adehsion properties of enterococci to intestinal mucus of different hosts. Vet Res. Com. 2004, 28, 647–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lauková, A.; Tomáška, M.; Drončovský, M.; Maďar, M.; Bino, E.; Dvorožňáková, E.; Chrastinová, Ľ.; Pogány Simonová, M.; Kološta, M. Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LP17L/1 from ewes stored cheese, promising strain for use not only in dairy products. Proceedings of scientific works from the conference Food Safety and quality, Piešťany-Nitra, Slovakia, 34-36. Eds. prof. Ing. Jozef Golian, DrSc., Ing. Jozef Čapla, PhD, 29-31 of March 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Speranza, B.; Campaniello, D.; Monacis, N.; Bevilacqua, A.; Sinigaglia, M.; Corbo, M.R. Functional cream cheese supplemented with Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis DSM 10140 and Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 20016 and prebiotics. Food Microbiol. 2016, 72, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patrovský, M.; Kouřimská, L.; Havlíková, Š.; Marková, J.; Pechar, R.; Rada, V. Utilization of bacteriocin-producing bacteria in dairy products. Mljekarstvo 2016, 66, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lauková, A.; Czikková, S.; Burdová, O. Anti-staphylococcal effect of enterocin in Sunar and yoghurt. Folia Microbiol. 1999, 44, 707–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zommiti Mohamed; Chikindas, M.L.; Ferchichi, M. Probiotics-live biotherapeutics :a story of success, limitations, and future prospects-not only for humans. Prob. Antimicrob. Prot. 2020, 12, 1266–1289. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
| Faeces | LPa 12/1 | LAB | Amyl. str. | Coliforms |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sampling 0/1 (n=8) | nt | 5.48 ± 0.52a | 5.49 ± 0.07 | 3.27 ± 0.49 |
| Sampling30EG (n=5) | 3.64 ± 0.56a | 6.07 ± 0.07d | 5.16 ± 0.30a | 4.66 ± 0.59a |
| Sampling 30 CG | nt | 6.47 ± 0.51 | 5.04 ± 0.47 | 5.08 ± 0.42 |
| Sampling 45 EG | 2.62 ± 0.61b | 7.04 ± 0.15b | 5.59 ± 0.04 | 3.76 ± 0.44b |
| Sampling 45 CG | nt | 7.1 ± 0.0c | 6.05 ± 0.18b | 2.28 ± 0.33 |
| n=5 | LPa 12/1 | LAB | Amyl. str. | Coliforms |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sampling 30 EG | 1.70 ± 1.30 | 6.03 ± 0.07 | 4.54 ± 0.11 | 5.33 ± 0.53 |
| Sampling 30 CG | nt | 6.04 ± 0.07 | 4.15 ± 0.52 | 6.07 ± 0.06 |
| Sampling 45 EG | 0.72 ± 0.08 | 6.04 ± 0.10 | 5.51 ± 0.3 | 5.96 ± 0.50 |
| Sampling 45 CG | nt | 6.47± 0.58 | 5.13 ± 0.21 | 5.71 ± 0.33 |
| n=5 | LPa 12/1 | LAB | Amyl. str. | Coliforms |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sampling 30 EG | 1.30 ± 0.0 | 4.23 ± 0.5 | 1.98 ± 0.40 | 2.93 ± 0.40 |
| Sampling 30 CG | nt | 4.25 ± 0.06 | 2.51 ± 0.58 | 1.98 ± 0.41 |
| Sampling 45 EG | <0.1 | 2.42 ± 0.55 | 1.30 ± 0.14 | 1.7 ± 0.30 |
| Sampling 45 CG | nt | 2.58 ± 1.60 | 2.85 ± 0.65 | 0.95 ± 0.0 |
| n=6 | PA | IPA |
|---|---|---|
| Sampling 30 EG | 61.5 ± 1.05a | 2.53 ± 0.21 |
| Sampling 30 CG | 60.0 ± 1.30 | 2.82 ± 0.11 |
| Sampling 45 EG | 62.0 ±2.37b | 2.93 ± 0.10 |
| Sampling 45 CG | 61.0 ± 0.84 | 2.82 ± 0.11 |
| pH | LPa12/1 | LAB | Amyl. str. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E/24 h | 3.90 | 5.1 | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| C/24 h | 3.91 | nt | 4.61 | 4.41 |
| E/ Day 7 | 4.55 | 5.15 | 6.1 | 5.1 |
| C/ Day 7 | 4.89 | nt | 4.54 | 5.30 |
| E/Day 10 | 3.70 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.1 |
| C/Day 10 | 4.85 | nt | 4.95 | 6.1 |
| E/ Day 14 | 4.0 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 5.1 |
| C/ Day 14 | 4.05 | nt | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| pH | LPa12/1 | LAB | Amyl. str. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E/24 h | 3.59 | 2.1 | 4.76 | 3.69 |
| C/24 h | nt | nt | nt | nt |
| E/Day 7 | 3.70 | 2.36 | 6.1 | 2.56 |
| C/Day 7 | 3.77 | nt | 4.54 | 2.75 |
| E/Day 10 | 3.80 | 4.78 | 6.1 | 5.1 |
| C/Day 10 | 3.90 | nt | 4.95 | 5.1 |
| E/Day 14 | 3.60 | 4.72 | 5.1 | 4.92 |
| C/Day 14 | 3.60 | nt | 4.65 | 4.70 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
