Submitted:
09 August 2023
Posted:
09 August 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
Context
Materials and methods
Sample collection and sequencing
Genome survey, assembly, annotation and assessment
Data Validation and Quality Control
Reuse Potential
Author Contributions
Funding
Consent for publication
Data Availability
Ethics approval
Competing interests
List of abbreviations
References
- Yin W, Wang Z-j, Li Q-y et al. Evolutionary trajectories of snake genes and genomes revealed by comparative analyses of five-pacer viper. Nature communications, 2016; 7(1): 13107. [CrossRef]
- Tan KY, Shamsuddin NN, Tan CH. Sharp-nosed Pit Viper (Deinagkistrodon acutus) from Taiwan and China: A comparative study on venom toxicity and neutralization by two specific antivenoms across the Strait. Acta tropica, 2022; 232: 106495. [CrossRef]
- Huang J, Zhao M, Xue C et al. Analysis of the Composition of Deinagkistrodon acutus Snake Venom Based on Proteomics, and Its Antithrombotic Activity and Toxicity Studies. Molecules, 2022; 27(7): 2229. [CrossRef]
- Huang F, Zhao S, Tong F et al. Unexpected death in a young man associated with a unilateral swollen leg: Pathological and toxicological findings in a fatal snakebite from Deinagkistrodon acutus (Chinese moccasin). Journal of forensic sciences, 2021; 66(2): 786-792. [CrossRef]
- Wang D-Q, Pan L-L, Yang D-C et al. Complete mitochondrial genome of the sharp-snouted pitviper Deinagkistrodon acutus (Reptilia, Viperidae). Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources, 2019; 4(2): 2900-2901. [CrossRef]
- Hu X-Q, Wu Q-L, Li X-Y et al. Study on venom protein components of Deinagkistrodon acutus living in different geographical units. Oxidation Communications, 2016; 39(A2): 1885-1895.
- Linfeng W, Lutao X, Pin L et al. Radial artery aneurysm formation and spontaneous rupture after snake bite to the right forearm. Toxicon : official journal of the International Society on Toxinology, 2020; 181: 79-81. [CrossRef]
- Huang J, Song W, Hua H et al. Antithrombotic and anticoagulant effects of a novel protein isolated from the venom of the Deinagkistrodon acutus snake. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 2021; 138: 111527. [CrossRef]
- Huang Z, He D, Liao M. Antibacterial activity of venoms from Guangxi cobra, Bungarus multicinctus and Deinagkistrodon acutus in vitro. Chinese Journal of Microecology, 2019; 31(10): 1135-1139. [CrossRef]
- Liu B, Cui L, Deng Z et al. Protocols for the assembly and annotation of snake genomes V.2. 2023. [CrossRef]
- Liu B, Shi Y, Yuan J et al. Estimation of genomic characteristics by analyzing k-mer frequency in de novo genome projects. aRxiv. 2013. [CrossRef]
- Liu B, Cui L, Deng Z et al. The genome assembly and annotation of the many-banded krait, Bungarus multicinctus. GigaByte; 2023: gigabyte82. [CrossRef]
- Emms DM, Kelly S. OrthoFinder: solving fundamental biases in whole genome comparisons dramatically improves orthogroup inference accuracy. Genome Biology, 2015; 16(1): 157. [CrossRef]
- Vidal N, Hedges SB. The molecular evolutionary tree of lizards, snakes, and amphisbaenians. Comptes rendus biologies, 2009; 332(2): 129–139. [CrossRef]
- Guo X, Chen F, Gao F et al. CNSA: a data repository for archiving omics data. Database, 2020; 2020: baaa055. [CrossRef]
- Feng ZC, Li JY, Fan Y et al. CNGBdb: China National GeneBank DataBase. Yi Chuan (Hereditas), 2020; 42(8): 799–809. [CrossRef]
- Wang X, Liu L, Zhu W et al. Supporting data for "Genome assembly and annotation of the Sharp-nosed Pit Viper Deinagkistrodon acutus based on next-generation sequencing data". GigaScience Database, 2023. [CrossRef]





| Item | Category | Size |
| Sequencing data | stLFR (Gb) | 164.75 |
| WGS (Gb) | 96.76 | |
| RNA-seq (Gb) | 10.42 | |
| Assembled genome (Gb) | 1.46 | |
| Longest Contig (Mb) | 0.52 | |
| Contig N50 (Mb) | 0.03 | |
| Longest scaffold (Mb) | 39.38 | |
| Scaffold N50 (Mb) | 6.21 | |
| GC content (%) | 37.9 |
| Type | Repeat Size | % of genome |
| Trf | 49,665,678 | 3.158437 |
| RepeatMasker (RRID:SCR_012954) | 254,179,490 | 16.16428 |
| Proteinmask | 190,282,517 | 12.100819 |
| De novo | 636,067,480 | 40.45005 |
| Total | 673,253,494 | 42.814856 |
| Type | Length (Bp) | % in genome |
| DNA | 27,712,037 | 1.762318 |
| LINE | 464,343,121 | 29.529418 |
| SINE | 984,426 | 0.062604 |
| LTR | 188,498,215 | 11.987348 |
| Other | 0 | 0 |
| Satellite | 1,180,615 | 0.07508 |
| Simple_repeat | 2,250,205 | 0.143099 |
| Unknown | 2,609,514 | 0.165949 |
| Total | 636,067,480 | 40.45005 |
| Number | Percentage (%) | |
| Total | 24,402 | 100% |
| Swiss-Prot annotated | 19,527 | 80.02% |
| KEGG annotated | 20,869 | 85.52% |
| TrEMBL annotated | 22,927 | 93.96% |
| InterPro annotated | 23,089 | 94.62% |
| GO annotated | 14,512 | 59.47% |
| Overall | 23,844 | 97.71% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).