Submitted:
25 July 2023
Posted:
26 July 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Reagents
2.2. Preparation of GA-Fixed Biomaterials
2.3. ECM Damage Assessment
2.4. Cell Cultures
2.5. Cytotoxicity Assay
2.6. Cell Proliferation Assay
2.7. Animals
2.8. Histological Analysis
2.12. Statistics
3. Results
3.1. Results of Damage Assessment
3.2. Results of Cytotoxicity and Cell Proliferation Assay
3.3. Results of In Vivo Analisis
3.4. Results of Correlation Assay

4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Vahanian, A.; Beyersdorf, F.; Praz, F.; Milojevic, M.; Baldus, S.; Bauersachs, J.; Capodanno, D.; Conradi, L.; De Bonis, M.; De Paulis, R.; et al. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur. Heart J. 2021, 43, 561–632. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-E-21-00009. [CrossRef]
- Santangelo, G., Bursi, F., Faggiano, A., Moscardelli, S., Simeoli, P. S., Guazzi, M., Lorusso, R., Carugo, S., & Faggiano, P. The Global Burden of Valvular. Heart Disease. From Clinical Epidemiology to Management. J Clin Med 2023, 12(6), 2178. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062178. [CrossRef]
- Aluru, J. S., Barsouk, A., Saginala, K., Rawla, P., & Barsouk, A. Valvular Heart Disease Epidemiology. Med Sci (Basel) 2022, 10(2), 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci10020032. [CrossRef]
- Wen, S., Zhou, Y., Yim, W. Y., Wang, S., Xu, L., Shi, J., Qiao, W., & Dong, N. Mechanisms and Drug Therapies of Bioprosthetic Heart Valve Calcification. Front Pharmacol 2022, 13, 909801. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.909801. [CrossRef]
- Wen, S., Qiao, W., Zhang, Y., & Dong, N. Development and trend in the field of valvular heart disease in China: an analysis based on the National Natural Science Foundation of China. Ann Transl Med 2020, 8(7), 449. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.03.165. [CrossRef]
- Kostyunin, A. E., Yuzhalin, A. E., Rezvova, M. A., Ovcharenko, E. A., Glushkova, T. V., & Kutikhin, A. G. Degeneration of Bioprosthetic Heart Valves: Update. J Am Heart Assoc 2020, 9(19), e018506. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.018506. [CrossRef]
- Capodanno, D., Petronio, A. S., Prendergast, B., Eltchaninoff, H., Vahanian, A., Modine, T., Lancellotti, P., Sondergaard, L., Ludman, P. F., Tamburino, C., Piazza, N., Hancock, J., Mehilli, J., Byrne, R. A., Baumbach, A., Kappetein, A. P., Windecker, S., Bax, J., & Haude, M. Standardized definitions of structural deterioration and valve failure in assessing long-term durability of transcatheter and surgical aortic bioprosthetic valves: a consensus statement from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) endorsed by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 2017, 38(45), 3382–3390. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx303. [CrossRef]
- Dvir, D., Bourguignon, T., Otto, C.M., et al. Standardized Definition of Structural Valve Degeneration for Surgical and Transcatheter Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves. Circulation 2018, 137(4), 388-399. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030729. [CrossRef]
- Cartlidge, T. R. G., Doris, M. K., Sellers, S. L., Pawade, T. A., White, A. C., Pessotto, R., et al. Detection and Prediction of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Degeneration. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol 2019, 73, 1107–1119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.12.056. [CrossRef]
- Koziarz, A., Makhdoum, A., Butany, J., Ouzounian, M., and Chung, J. Modes of Bioprosthetic Valve Failure: a Narrative Review. Curr. Opin. Cardiol 2020, 35, 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1097 / HCO.0000000000000711. [CrossRef]
- Hopkins, R. A. Bioprosthetic Valves and Laudable Inflammation. Circulation 2006, 114, 261–264. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.639005. [CrossRef]
- Siddiqui, R. F., Abraham, J. R., and Butany, J. Bioprosthetic Heart Valves: Modes of Failure. Histopathology 2009, 55, 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.2008.03190.x. [CrossRef]
- Manji, R. A., Hara, H., and Cooper, D. K. Characterization of the Cellular Infiltrate in Bioprosthetic Heart Valves Explanted from Patients with Structural Valve Deterioration. Xenotransplantation 2015, 22, 406–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/xen.12187. [CrossRef]
- Bozso, S. J., Kang, J. J. H., Basu, R., Adam, B., Dyck, J. R. B., Oudit, G. Y., et al. Structural Valve Deterioration Is Linked to Increased Immune Infiltrate and Chemokine Expression. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2021, 14, 503–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-020-10080-x. [CrossRef]
- Shen, M., Carpentier, S. M., Berrebi, A. J., Chen, L., Martinet, B., and Carpentier, A. Protein Adsorption of Calcified and Noncalcified Valvular Bioprostheses after Human Implantation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001, 71, S406–S407. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(01)02501-2. [CrossRef]
- Sakaue, T., Nakaoka, H., Shikata, F., Aono, J., Kurata, M., Uetani, T., et al. Biochemical and Histological Evidence of Deteriorated Bioprosthetic Valve Leaflets: the Accumulation of Fibrinogen and Plasminogen. Biol Open 2018, 7, bio034009. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.034009. [CrossRef]
- Senage T, Paul A, Le Tourneau T, et al. The role of antibody responses against glycans in bioprosthetic heart valve calcification and deterioration. Nat Med. 2022, 28(2), 283-294. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01682-w. [CrossRef]
- Friedrich, E.E., Lanier, S.T., Niknam-Bienia, S., et al. Residual sodium dodecyl sulfate in decellularized muscle matrices leads to fibroblast activation in vitro and foreign body response in vivo. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2018, 12(3), e1704-e1715. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2604. [CrossRef]
- Lee, C., Lim, H.G., Lee, C.H., Kim, Y.J. Effects of glutaraldehyde concentration and fixation time on material characteristics and calcification of bovine pericardium: implications for the optimal method of fixation of autologous pericardium used for cardiovascular surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017, 24(3), 402-406. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivw356. [CrossRef]
- Gilpin, A., Yang, Y. Decellularization Strategies for Regenerative Medicine: From Processing Techniques to Applications. Biomed Res Int. 2017, 9831534. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9831534. [CrossRef]
- Mendibil, U., Ruiz-Hernandez, R., Retegi-Carrion, S., Garcia-Urquia, N., Olalde-Graells, B., Abarrategi, A. Tissue-Specific Decellularization Methods: Rationale and Strategies to Achieve Regenerative Compounds. Int J Mol Sci. 2020, 21(15), 5447. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21155447. [CrossRef]
- Hwang, J., San, B.H., Turner, N.J., et al. Molecular assessment of collagen denaturation in decellularized tissues using a collagen hybridizing peptide. Acta Biomater. 2017, 53, 268-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.079. [CrossRef]
- Reing, J.E., Brown, B.N., Daly, K.A., et al. The effects of processing methods upon mechanical and biologic properties of porcine dermal extracellular matrix scaffolds. Biomaterials 2010, 31(33), 8626-8633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.083. [CrossRef]
- Kasravi, M., Ahmadi, A., Babajani, A., et al. Immunogenicity of decellularized extracellular matrix scaffolds: a bottleneck in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Biomater Res. 2023, 27(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-023-00348-z. [CrossRef]
- Akhyari, P., Aubin, H., Gwanmesia, P., et al. The quest for an optimized protocol for whole-heart decellularization: a comparison of three popular and a novel decellularization technique and their diverse effects on crucial extracellular matrix qualities. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2011, 17(9), 915-926. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEC.2011.0210. [CrossRef]
- Faulk, D.M., Carruthers, C.A., Warner, H.J, et al. The effect of detergents on the basement membrane complex of a biologic scaffold material. Acta Biomater. 2014, 10(1), 183-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.09.006. [CrossRef]
- Cartmell, J.S., Dunn, M.G. Effect of chemical treatments on tendon cellularity and mechanical properties. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000, 49(1), 134-140. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(200001)49:1<134::aid-jbm17>3.0.co;2-d. [CrossRef]
- McInnes, A.D., Moser, M.A.J., Chen, X.. Preparation and Use of Decellularized Extracellular Matrix for Tissue Engineering. J Funct Biomater. 2022, 13(4), 240. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb13040240. [CrossRef]
- Fernández-Pérez, J., Ahearne, M. The impact of decellularization methods on extracellular matrix derived hydrogels [published correction appears in Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 19;9(1):19818]. Sci Rep. 2019, 9(1), 14933. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49575-2. [CrossRef]
- Li, N., Li, Y., Gong, D., Xia, C., Liu, X., Xu, Z. Efficient decellularization for bovine pericardium with extracellular matrix preservation and good biocompatibility. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018, 26(5), 768-776. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivx416. [CrossRef]
- Lumpkins, S.B., Pierre, N., McFetridge, P.S. A mechanical evaluation of three decellularization methods in the design of a xenogeneic scaffold for tissue engineering the temporomandibular joint disc. Acta Biomater. 2008, 4(4), 808-816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2008.01.016. [CrossRef]
- Leo, L., Bridelli, M.G., Polverini, E. Reversible processes in collagen dehydration: A molecular dynamics study. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2021, 714, 109079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2021.109079. [CrossRef]
- Lai, J.Y., Ma, D.H. Glutaraldehyde cross-linking of amniotic membranes affects their nanofibrous structures and limbal epithelial cell culture characteristics. Int J Nanomedicine 2013, 8, 4157-4168. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S52731. [CrossRef]
- Mendoza-Novelo, B., Alvarado-Castro, D.I., Mata-Mata, J.L., et al. Stability and mechanical evaluation of bovine pericardium cross-linked with polyurethane prepolymer in aqueous medium. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2013, 33(4), 2392-2398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2013.02.001. [CrossRef]
- Fadeev, R.; Chekanov, A.; Solovieva, M.; Bezborodova, O.; Nemtsova, E.; Dolgikh, N.; Fadeeva, I.; Senotov, A.; Kobyakova, M.; Evstratova, Y.; et al. Improved Anticancer Effect of Recombinant Protein izTRAIL Combined with Sorafenib and Peptide iRGD. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 525. [CrossRef]
- Liang, X., Zheng, C., Ding, K., et al. Arginine-grafted porcine pericardium by copolymerization to improve the cytocompatibility, hemocompatibility and anti-calcification properties of bioprosthetic heart valve materials. J Mater Chem B. 2022, 10(29), 5571-5581. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2tb00798c. [CrossRef]
- Human, P., Ofoegbu, C., Ilsley, H., et al. Decellularization and engineered crosslinking: a promising dual approach towards bioprosthetic heart valve longevity. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020, 58(6), 1192-1200. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezaa257. [CrossRef]
- Xue, Y., Kossar, A.P., Abramov, A., et al. Age-related enhanced degeneration of bioprosthetic valves due to leaflet calcification, tissue crosslinking, and structural changes. Cardiovasc Res. 2023, 119(1), 302-315. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvac002. [CrossRef]
- Jin, L., He, H., Yang, F., Xu, L., Guo, G., Wang, Y. Tough pNAGA hydrogel hybridized porcine pericardium for the pre-mounted TAVI valve with improved anti-tearing properties and hemocompatibility. Biomed Mater. 2020, 15(6), 065013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/aba239. [CrossRef]
- Luo, Y., Huang, S., Ma, L. A novel detergent-based decellularization combined with carbodiimide crosslinking for improving anti-calcification of bioprosthetic heart valve. Biomed Mater. 2021, 16(4), 10.1088/1748-605X/ac0088. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/ac008. [CrossRef]
- Jin, L., Guo, G., Jin, W., Lei, Y., Wang, Y. Cross-Linking Methacrylated Porcine Pericardium by Radical Polymerization Confers Enhanced Extracellular Matrix Stability, Reduced Calcification, and Mitigated Immune Response to Bioprosthetic Heart Valves. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2019, 5(4), 1822-1832. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00091. [CrossRef]
- Tong, Q., Sun, A., Wang, Z., et al. Hybrid heart valves with VEGF-loaded zwitterionic hydrogel coating for improved anti-calcification and re-endothelialization. Mater Today Bio. 2022, 17, 100459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100459. [CrossRef]
- Jorge-Herrero, E., Fernández, P., Escudero, C., García-Páez, J.M., Castillo-Olivares, J.L. Calcification of pericardial tissue pretreated with different amino acids. Biomaterials 1996, 17(6), 571-575. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(96)88707-2. [CrossRef]
- Grabenwöger, M., Sider, J., Fitzal, F., et al. Impact of glutaraldehyde on calcification of pericardial bioprosthetic heart valve material. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996, 62(3), 772-777.
- Williams, D.F., Bezuidenhout, D., de Villiers, J., Human, P., Zilla, P. Long-Term Stability and Biocompatibility of Pericardial Bioprosthetic Heart Valves. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021, 8, 728577. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.728577. [CrossRef]
- Lillie, R.D., Fullmer, H.M. Histopathologic technic and practical histochemistry, 4th ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, CA, USA, 1976; p. 942.
- Kim, K. M., Herrera, G. A., and Battarbee, H. D. Role of Glutaraldehyde in Calcification of Porcine Aortic Valve Fibroblasts. Am. J. Pathol. 1999, 154, 843–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65331-X. [CrossRef]
- Schoen, F. J., and Levy, R. J. Founder’s Award, 25th Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials, Perspectives. Providence, RI, April 28-May 2, 1999. Tissue Heart Valves: Current Challenges and Future Research Perspectives. J. Biomed. Mater Res. 1999, 47, 439–465. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(19991215)47:4<439::aid-jbm1>3.0.co;2-o. [CrossRef]
- Kim, K. M. Cells, rather Than Extracellular Matrix, Nucleate Apatite in Glutaraldehyde-Treated Vascular. Tissue. J. Biomed. Mater Res. 2002, 59, 639–645. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.10038. [CrossRef]
- Kostyunin, A., Mukhamadiyarov, R., Glushkova, T., Bogdanov, L., Shishkova, D., Osyaev, N., et al. Ultrastructural Pathology of Atherosclerosis, Calcific Aortic Valve Disease, and Bioprosthetic Heart Valve Degeneration: Commonalities and Differences. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7434. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207434. [CrossRef]
- Busch, E., Hohenester, E., Timpl, R., Paulsson, M., and Maurer, P. Calcium Affinity, Cooperativity, and Domain Interactions of Extracellular EF-Hands Present in BM-40. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 25508–25515. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M001770200. [CrossRef]
- Kostrzewa-Nowak, D., Ciechanowicz, A., Clark, J.S.C., Nowak, R. Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns and Th-Cell-Related Cytokines Released after Progressive Effort. J Clin Med. 2020, 9(3), 876. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030876. [CrossRef]
- Wood, K.J., Goto, R. Mechanisms of rejection: current perspectives. Transplantation 2012, 93(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0b013e31823cab44. [CrossRef]
- Gong, T., Liu, L., Jiang, W., Zhou, R. DAMP-sensing receptors in sterile inflammation and inflammatory diseases. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020, 20(2), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-019-0215-7. [CrossRef]
- Hatamnejad, M.R., Baradaran Ghavami, S., Shirvani, M., et al. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and inflammatory bowel disease; Beneficial or malpractice. Front Immunol. 2022, 13, 980189. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.980189. [CrossRef]
- García-García, A., Martin, I. Extracellular Matrices to Modulate the Innate Immune Response and Enhance Bone Healing. Front Immunol. 2019, 10, 2256. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.02256. [CrossRef]
- Londono, R., Dziki, J.L., Haljasmaa, E., Turner, N.J., Leifer, C.A., Badylak, S.F. The effect of cell debris within biologic scaffolds upon the macrophage response. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2017, 105(8), 2109-2118. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36055. [CrossRef]
- Galili, U. Human Anti-Gal and Anti-Non-Gal Immune Response to Porcine Tissue Implants. Host Res. to Biomater. 2015, 239–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-800196-7.00010-4. [CrossRef]
- Chakraborty, J., Roy, S., Ghosh, S. Regulation of decellularized matrix mediated immune response. Biomater Sci. 2020, 8(5), 1194-1215. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9bm01780a. [CrossRef]
- Wells, J.M., Gaggar, A., Blalock, J.E. MMP generated matrikines. Matrix Biol. 2015, 44-46, 122-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matbio.2015.01.016. [CrossRef]
- Payne, G.A., Sharma, N.S., Lal, C.V., et al. Prolyl endopeptidase contributes to early neutrophilic inflammation in acute myocardial transplant rejection. JCI Insight. 2021, 6(6), e139687. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.139687. [CrossRef]
- Schoen, F.J., Levy, R.J. Bioprosthetic heart valve calcification: membrane-mediated events and alkaline phosphatase. Bone Miner. 1992, 17(2), 129-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-6009(92)90723-q. [CrossRef]
- Lee, C., Lim, H.G., Lee, C.H., Kim, Y.J. Effects of glutaraldehyde concentration and fixation time on material characteristics and calcification of bovine pericardium: implications for the optimal method of fixation of autologous pericardium used for cardiovascular surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017, 24(3), 402-406. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivw356. [CrossRef]








| Group | Decellularization | Cross-linking | Washing | Preservation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | 1% SDS | 0.625% GA, 4% FD | 0.9% NaCl | GA, EtOH |
| A2 | 1% SDS | 0.5% GA | 70% IPA, 90% EtOH | FD, GA, EtOH |
| M1 | Triton X-100, SDC | 0.2% GA | 35% IPA | GA, EtOH |
| M2 | Triton X-100, SDC | 0.2% GA | 35% IPA | DN, EtOH |
| S | Triton X-100, SDC | 0.2% GA | 30% EtOH | DN, EtOH |
| Group | 8 weeks | 24 weeks | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resorption, % | Calcification, % | Resorption, % | Calcification, % | |
| Edw | 11,4 ± 1,21 | 0 | 2,6 ± 1,05 | 0 |
| A1 | 38,12 ± 2,39 | 0 | 49,22 ± 6,93 | 0 |
| A2 | 15,86 ± 3,45 | 33,8 ± 5 | 10,36 ± 1,15 | 79,7 ± 9,3 |
| M1 | 29,66 ± 1,09 | 0 | 10,08 ± 2,05 | 15,3 ± 4 |
| M2 | 20,36 ± 1,33 | 0 | 12,79 ± 1,1 | 65,5 ± 7,5 |
| G | 10,46 ± 1,88 | 0 | 6,12 ± 1,41 | 0 |
| Coefficient Range (absolute value), rs |
Interpretation |
|---|---|
| <0,3 | Low correlation |
| 0,3 – 0,5 | Moderate correlation |
| 0,5 – 0,7 | Noticeable correlation |
| 0,7 – 0,9 | High correlation |
| >0,9 | Very high correlation |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).