Atanacković Jeličić, J.; Rapaić, M.R.; Maraš, I.; Tot, E.; Ecet, D. Can Technology Reinforce Cogency of the Architectural Argument: Trial and Error Approach. Buildings2023, 13, 1866.
Atanacković Jeličić, J.; Rapaić, M.R.; Maraš, I.; Tot, E.; Ecet, D. Can Technology Reinforce Cogency of the Architectural Argument: Trial and Error Approach. Buildings 2023, 13, 1866.
Atanacković Jeličić, J.; Rapaić, M.R.; Maraš, I.; Tot, E.; Ecet, D. Can Technology Reinforce Cogency of the Architectural Argument: Trial and Error Approach. Buildings2023, 13, 1866.
Atanacković Jeličić, J.; Rapaić, M.R.; Maraš, I.; Tot, E.; Ecet, D. Can Technology Reinforce Cogency of the Architectural Argument: Trial and Error Approach. Buildings 2023, 13, 1866.
Abstract
The main question proposed in this research is if different types of organizational approach, adapted from rapidly changing disciplines — such as IT industry, and software engineering in particular — could help overcome this gap by shortening the response time needed to analyze advanced solutions in accordance with changed circumstances, thus allowing for architectural programming to obtain different positions in the timeline of project planning and realization. We propose a novel methodology of architectural design as a self-reliant instrument inspired by Agile Manifesto and some of its instantiations, most notably by the Scrum Framework.
Keywords
Transdisciplinary Urban Planning; Methodology of Architectural Design; Design Strategy vs. Design Tactics; Agile Development; Scrum Framework
Subject
Engineering, Architecture, Building and Construction
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
