Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Pioneering PGC-1α-Boosted Secretome: A Novel Approach to Combating Liver Fibrosis

Submitted:

01 June 2023

Posted:

02 June 2023

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Liver fibrosis is a critical health issue with limited treatment options. This study investigates the potential of PGC-Sec, a secretome derived from PGC-1α-overexpressing adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs), as a novel therapeutic strategy for liver fibrosis. Upon achieving a cellular confluence of 70-80%, ASCs were transfected with pcDNA-PGC-1α. PGC-Sec, obtained through concentration of conditioned media using ultrafiltration units with a 3-kDa cutoff, was assessed through in vitro assays and in vivo mouse models. In vitro, PGC-Sec significantly reduced LX2 human hepatic stellate cell proliferation and mitigated mitochondrial oxidative stress compared to control-secretome (Ctrl-Sec). In an in vivo mouse model, PGC-Sec treatment led to notable reductions in hepatic enzyme activity, serum pro-inflammatory cytokine concentrations, and fibrosis-related marker expression. Histological analysis demonstrated improved liver histology and reduced fibrosis severity in PGC-Sec-treated mice. Immunohistochemical staining confirmed enhanced expression of PGC-1α, OPA1 (a mitochondrial function marker), and PPARα (an anti-fibrogenic marker) in the PGC-Sec-treated group, along with reduced Collagen 1A expression (a pro-fibrogenic marker). These findings highlight the therapeutic potential of PGC-Sec in combating liver fibrosis by enhancing mitochondrial biogenesis and function, and promoting antifibrotic processes. PGC-Sec holds promise as a novel treatment strategy for liver fibrosis.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Liver fibrosis is a chronic and progressive liver disease characterized by excessive accumulation of extracellular matrix proteins, which leads to impaired liver function and ultimately liver failure. This condition is a growing global health concern, as it is associated with various liver diseases such as viral hepatitis, alcoholic liver disease, and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis [1]. Despite extensive research, effective treatment options for liver fibrosis remain limited, highlighting the urgent need for novel therapeutic strategies.
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), particularly adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs), have shown promising potential for liver regeneration due to their ability to differentiate into various cell types, secrete bioactive factors, and modulate immune responses. However, the optimization of their regenerative potential is crucial for successful therapeutic applications, as their efficacy can be influenced by factors such as donor age, tissue source, and culture conditions. One of the key factors determining the characteristics of MSCs is the appropriate balance between intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and scavenging by antioxidant enzymes [2,3]. Elevated ROS levels are associated with cellular damage and impaired regenerative potential, while controlled ROS levels play a vital role in maintaining cellular homeostasis and promoting tissue repair [4,5]. Thus, modulating the intracellular redox state of MSCs could potentially enhance their therapeutic efficacy.
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator 1α (PGC-1α) is a potent regulator of mitochondrial biogenesis and function, and its overexpression leads to increased expression of mitochondrial antioxidant enzymes, thereby reducing oxidative stress and cell death [6,7,8]. Additionally, PGC-1α has been implicated in the regulation of various cellular processes, such as energy metabolism, inflammation, and cell survival, which are relevant to tissue repair and regeneration. In this study, we aimed to enhance the antifibrogenic potential of adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) by transfecting them with PGC-1α and investigate the therapeutic potential of the secretome released from these PGC-ASCs in a mouse model of liver fibrosis. By leveraging the beneficial effects of PGC-1α-driven upregulation of mitochondrial proliferation, we hypothesize that the secretome of PGC-ASCs will exhibit improved antifibrogenic and regenerative properties compared to the secretome of unmodified ASCs. This investigation will provide valuable insights into the development of cell-based therapies for liver fibrosis and other fibrotic diseases, as well as contribute to the growing body of knowledge on the mechanisms underlying MSC-mediated tissue repair.

2. Results

2.1. In Vitro Effects of PGC-Sec on Cell Viability and Mitochondrial Oxidative Stress

To evaluate the therapeutic potential of PGC-1α-overexpressing adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) in liver fibrosis, we generated PGC-1α-overexpressing ASCs by transfecting a plasmid encoding PGC-1α (Figure 1A). Subsequently, we harvested the PGC-secretome (PGC-Sec) from these PGC-ASCs following an optimized protocol, involving centrifugation and filtration as described in the methods section. We established an in vitro model of liver injury by treating LX2 cells (human hepatic stellate cells) with the potent hepatotoxin thioacetamide (TAA). To assess the impact of the Ctrl-Sec and PGC-Sec on the viability of LX2 cells, we compared control LX2 cells without treatment, and those treated with either Ctrl-Sec or PGC-Sec (Figure 1B). Our results showed no significant difference among the three conditions in the control LX2 cells. However, upon TAA-induced liver injury, PGC-Sec treatment significantly enhanced cell viability compared to the untreated group (P < 0.05) (Figure 1B), highlighting the potential therapeutic effects of PGC-Sec.
Subsequently, we employed MitoSOX flow cytometry to investigate the role of PGC-secretome in modulating mitochondrial superoxide production (Figure 1C). In control LX2 cells, MitoSOX fluorescence remained unaltered among the No Treatment, Ctrl-Sec treatment, and PGC-Sec treatment groups. Strikingly, following TAA-induced injury, both Ctrl-Sec and PGC-Sec treatments resulted in a significant decrease in MitoSOX fluorescence compared to the No Treatment group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the PGC-Sec treatment group exhibited a significantly greater reduction in MitoSOX fluorescence compared to the Ctrl-Sec group (P < 0.05). Taken together, our findings reveal the remarkable potential of PGC-secretome in enhancing cell viability and mitigating mitochondrial oxidative stress in an in vitro model of liver injury.

2.2. In Vivo Impact of PGC-Sec on Hepatic Enzyme Activity and Serum Inflammatory Cytokine Concentrations

To investigate the antifibrogenic potential of PGC-Sec in liver fibrosis, we first established a mouse model of liver fibrosis by allowing mice to freely consume a methionine-choline-deficient (MCD) diet ad libitum for two weeks, which was continued until the fourth week of the experiment (Figure 2A). The mice were divided into four groups: control mice (n = 5), saline injection (n = 8), Ctrl-Sec injection (n = 8), and PGC-Sec injection (n = 8). Each i.v. secretome injection contained 100 µL of secretome derived from 5x105 cells and was administered twice weekly, totaling six injections over a two-week period. At the beginning of the fifth week, mice were euthanized for the collection of blood and liver samples.
When examining serum liver enzyme levels, both aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) demonstrated significant reductions in the secretome-treated groups (Ctrl-Sec & PGC-Sec) compared to the control group (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2B). Furthermore, the PGC-Sec group exhibited significantly lower liver enzyme levels than the Ctrl-Sec group (P < 0.05). We next assessed serum levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) (Figure 2C). Both secretome-treated groups (Ctrl-Sec & PGC-Sec) displayed significant decreases in the blood levels of IL-6 and TNF-α compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Notably, the PGC-Sec group showed a significantly greater reduction in the blood levels of IL-6 and TNF-α relative to the Ctrl-Sec group (P < 0.05).

2.3. In Vivo Impact of PGC-Sec on the Expression of Fibrosis-Related Markers and Liver Histology

Liver specimens were obtained from each experimental group, and the expression of mRNAs associated with liver fibrosis was assessed using quantitative real-time PCR (Figure 3A). Notably, the expression of pro-fibrogenic markers, collagen and TGF-β mRNA, was significantly reduced in the secretome injection groups (Ctrl-Sec & PGC-Sec) compared to the saline injection group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the PGC-Sec group displayed a more pronounced decrease in collagen and TGF-β mRNA expression relative to the Ctrl-Sec group (P < 0.05).
Subsequently, the protein levels of ColA1, a pro-fibrogenic marker, and TIMP, an anti-fibrogenic marker, were analyzed using Western blotting (Figure 3B). ColA1 expression was significantly lower in the secretome injection groups (Ctrl-Sec & PGC-Sec) than in the saline injection group (P < 0.05). Conversely, TIMP expression was significantly higher in the secretome injection groups (Ctrl-Sec & PGC-Sec) compared to the saline injection group (P < 0.05). Moreover, the PGC-Sec group exhibited a significantly increased TIMP expression relative to the Ctrl-Sec group (P < 0.05).
Histological analysis was performed on liver specimens from each group using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining (Figure 3C). The secretome injection groups (Ctrl-Sec & PGC-Sec) demonstrated a significant reduction in liver fibrosis severity compared to the saline injection group, with the PGC-Sec group displaying the most substantial reduction (P < 0.05). This trend was further corroborated by Sirius red staining (P < 0.05) (Fig. 3D), a reliable method for visualizing and assessing liver fibrosis.

2.4. Immunohistochemistry Validating the Antifibrogenic Effects of PGC-Sec

Next, we aimed to investigate the distinct effects of PGC-Sec using immunohistochemical staining. Initially, we employed PGC1α immunohistochemistry to verify that PGC1α expression was significantly elevated in the PGC-Sec group (P < 0.05) (Figure 4A). Subsequently, we compared OPA1 expression, an indicator of mitochondrial function, across the different groups (Figure 4B). Among the injection groups, the PGC-Sec group exhibited the highest OPA1 expression (P < 0.05). The notable overexpression of OPA1 in the PGC-Sec group is believed to stem from the remarkable enhancement of energy production and overall mitochondrial function, driven by the increased expression of PGC-1α in the PGC-Sec group. Moreover, immunohistochemistry revealed that the expression of the pro-fibrogenic marker Collagen 1A was markedly reduced in the PGC-Sec group (P < 0.05) (Figure 4C), while the expression of the anti-fibrogenic marker PPARα was significantly increased (P < 0.05) (Figure 4D). Taken altogether, these results highlight the profound impact of PGC-Sec treatment on enhancing mitochondrial biogenesis and function, as well as promoting anti-fibrosis process, collectively demonstrating its potential as a novel therapeutic strategy for liver fibrosis.

3. Discussion

This study investigates the therapeutic potential of the secretome released from PGC-1α-overexpressing adipose-derived stem cells (PGC-Sec) in liver fibrosis treatment. Using in vitro and in vivo models, we demonstrate that PGC-Sec enhances cell viability, reduces mitochondrial oxidative stress, lowers serum liver enzyme levels, and attenuates pro-inflammatory cytokine concentrations. Furthermore, PGC-Sec significantly modulates the expression of fibrosis-related markers and improves liver histology. Immunohistochemistry confirms the upregulation of mitochondrial function markers, such as OPA1, in the PGC-Sec group, indicating a strong association between PGC-1α-driven mitochondrial proliferation and the antifibrogenic potential of the secretome. Collectively, our findings reveal the promise of PGC-Sec as a novel therapeutic strategy for liver fibrosis management.
PGC-1α is a transcriptional coactivator that plays a pivotal role in regulating cellular energy metabolism, particularly in the context of mitochondrial biogenesis, oxidative phosphorylation, and fatty acid oxidation [6,7,8]. As a master regulator of energy homeostasis, PGC-1α is essential in maintaining metabolic flexibility in various tissues, such as the liver, skeletal muscle, and heart [9,10]. Its influence on mitochondrial function has profound implications for numerous physiological processes, including cellular respiration, thermogenesis, and overall energy balance [6]. Additionally, PGC-1α is implicated in various disease conditions, such as obesity, diabetes, and neurodegenerative disorders, where mitochondrial dysfunction and energy imbalance are key features [7]. Consequently, PGC-1α has garnered significant attention as a potential therapeutic target for a wide range of metabolic and degenerative diseases, highlighting its remarkable significance in the fields of cell biology, metabolism, and human health.
PGC-1α has emerged as a potential player in the context of liver fibrosis, a chronic liver disease characterized by excessive accumulation of extracellular matrix components, ultimately leading to impaired liver function [11,12]. As a key regulator of mitochondrial biogenesis and function, PGC-1α has been implicated in modulating the processes associated with liver fibrosis progression and resolution. Dysregulated energy metabolism and mitochondrial dysfunction have been observed in fibrotic livers, with PGC-1α potentially serving as a therapeutic target to counteract these changes. By enhancing mitochondrial function, oxidative phosphorylation, and fatty acid oxidation, PGC-1α could alleviate inflammation, oxidative stress, and hepatic stellate cell activation, which are hallmarks of liver fibrosis [13,14,15]. Moreover, PGC-1α has been shown to regulate the expression of various fibrosis-related markers, further underscoring its potential in controlling the fibrogenic process [16,17,18]. Therefore, a better understanding of PGC-1α's role in liver fibrosis may provide novel insights into the development of effective therapeutic strategies to manage and treat this debilitating liver disease.
The use of PGC-Sec presents several advantages over direct PGC-1α administration for the treatment of liver fibrosis. First, the secretome contains a rich array of bioactive molecules, including growth factors, cytokines, and extracellular vesicles, which can act in concert to promote tissue repair, modulate inflammation, and mitigate fibrosis [19,20]. This multifaceted approach may offer a more effective therapeutic outcome compared to targeting PGC-1α alone. Second, utilizing the secretome takes advantage of the paracrine effects of stem cells, circumventing potential challenges associated with stem cell engraftment, survival, and differentiation. Third, the use of PGC-Sec may reduce the risk of off-target effects or unintended consequences associated with direct PGC-1α manipulation. Lastly, PGC-Sec administration is a cell-free therapy, which may simplify production, storage, and transportation, ultimately expediting its translation to clinical settings. Collectively, these advantages suggest that PGC-Sec holds promise as a novel therapeutic strategy for the treatment of liver fibrosis, warranting further investigation into its efficacy and safety.
The potential mechanism through which PGC-Sec improves liver fibrosis involves several key processes. First, PGC-Sec contains various growth factors, cytokines, and extracellular vesicles, which together contribute to a multifaceted regenerative environment. This environment promotes hepatocyte viability and proliferation, leading to the restoration of damaged liver tissue. Additionally, PGC-Sec is thought to modulate the immune response by reducing the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and TNF-α, thereby alleviating inflammation associated with liver fibrosis. Furthermore, given the critical role PGC-1α plays in liver disease pathogenesis [6,8], it is plausible that PGC-Sec could serve as a promising therapeutic approach for ameliorating liver fibrosis. In a study by Sugden et al. (2010), the authors demonstrated that mice lacking hepatic PGC-1α developed hepatic steatosis and inflammation when fed a high-fat diet [21]. Moreover, in another study by Koliaki et al. (2015), the authors reported that hepatic PGC-1α expression was significantly reduced in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), which are both conditions that can progress to liver fibrosis [22]. Lastly, the enhancement of mitochondrial biogenesis and function by PGC-1α overexpression in PGC-Sec-treated cells might help to ameliorate the metabolic disturbances that contribute to the progression of liver fibrosis [23,24]. Altogether, these combined actions of PGC-Sec create a multifaceted therapeutic approach to improve liver fibrosis.
In conclusion, our findings reveal the secretome from PGC-1α-overexpressing adipose-derived stem cells (PGC-Sec) as a promising therapeutic candidate for liver fibrosis treatment, by decreasing proliferation of activated HSC cells, reducing oxidative stress, modulating fibrosis-related markers, and improving liver histology. Furthermore, the observed upregulation of mitochondrial function markers, such as OPA1, highlights the critical role of PGC-1α-driven mitochondrial proliferation in contributing to the antifibrogenic potential of the secretome. Collectively, these results underscore the promise of PGC-Sec as a novel and effective therapeutic strategy for liver fibrosis management, paving the way for future research and clinical applications.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Cell Culture

LX2 human hepatic stellate cells (HSC cells) were kindly donated by Dr. Won-il Jeong of KAIST Biomedical Research of Korea and cultured in high-glucose Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/mL of penicillin, and 0.1 mg/mL of streptomycin. Human adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) were donated by Hurim BioCell Co. Ltd. (Seoul, Korea) (IRB number 700069-201407-BR-002-01) and cultured in low-glucose DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/mL of penicillin, and 0.1 mg/mL of streptomycin. Cells were incubated at 37℃ in a CO2 incubator (Thermo).

4.2. Preparation of PGC-Secretome

ASCs were grown in 100 mm cell dishes (Corning Glass Works, Corning, NY). After reaching 70–80% confluence, ASCs were transiently transfected with 4 μg pcDNA-PGC-1α. Twenty-four hours later, 1.0 × 106 ASCs were cultured in 7 mL serum-free low-glucose DMEM for 24 h. The conditioned media were concentrated 25-fold using ultrafiltration units with a 3-kDa molecular weight cutoff (Amicon Ultra-PL 3; Millipore, Bedford, MA) to obtain 0.28 mL of secretome from 1.0 × 106 ASCs. Mice were injected with 0.1 mL of secretome and PGC-secretome, equivalent to the secretome obtained from 5 × 105 ASCs. The normal secretome was obtained from empty vector-transfected ASCs, while PGC-secretome was obtained from pcDNA-PGC-1 α transfected ASCs.

4.3. Cell Proliferation Assay

Cell proliferation of LX2 cells was evaluated using the EZ-Cytox Cell Proliferation Assay kit (Itsbio, Seoul, Republic of Korea) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

4.4. Animal Experiments

Animal studies were carried out in compliance with the guidelines of the Institute for Laboratory Animal Research, Korea (IRB No: CUMC-2020-0125-03). Seven-week-old male C57BL/6J mice (Central Laboratory Animal Inc., Seoul, Korea) were used. An in vivo model of liver fibrosis was generated using methionine/choline-deficient diets (MCD diet; ENVIGO, Seoul, Korea). Mice freely consumed a MCD diet ad libitum for two weeks, which was continued until the fourth week of the experiment. Mice were divided into four experimental groups: control (n = 5), MCD diet + saline injection (n = 8), MCD diet + control-secretome (Ctrl-Sec) injection (n = 8), and MCD diet + PGC-1α-boosted secretome (PGC-Sec) (n = 8). After 14 days on the MCD diet, mice were administered intravenous injections of 0.1 mL of saline, Ctrl-Sec, or PGC-Sec three times per week for a duration of two weeks (totaling six injections). At the beginning of the fifth week, mice were euthanized for the collection of blood and liver samples.

4.5. Real-Time PCR

Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Reverse transcription was performed with 1 µg RNA using an RT-premix kit (TOYOBO, Osaka, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. SYBR Green real-time quantitative PCR was conducted with primers specific to mouse Collagen1, TGF-β1, and GAPDH. The reaction was performed using an Applied Biosystems Step One Plus Real-Time PCR system (Thermo). Expression levels for each target gene were calculated using the comparative threshold cycle method after normalization to the GAPDH gene. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) from three independent experiments.

4.6. Western Blot Analysis

Liver specimens from mice were lysed using the EzRIPA Lysis kit (ATTO Corporation; Tokyo, Japan) and protein concentrations were quantified using Bradford reagent (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Proteins were analyzed by western blot using primary antibodies against TIMP1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA), CollagenA1 (Novus Bio, CO), and β-actin (Cell Signaling Technology, MA) at a 1:1000 dilution, followed by HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:2000 dilution) from Vector Laboratories (Burlingame, CA). Specific immune complexes were detected using the Western Blotting Plus Chemiluminescence Reagent (Millipore, Bedford, MA).

4.7. Serology Test and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

Blood samples were collected from each mouse, and the concentrations of liver injury markers, including aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT), were measured using an IDEXX VetTest Chemistry Analyzer (IDEXX Laboratories, Inc., Westbrook, ME, USA). Mouse interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α concentrations were measured by sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Abbkine, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

4.8. Immunohistochemistry and Sirius Red Staining

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated, and subjected to epitope retrieval using standard procedures. Antibodies against Collagen1α (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), PGC-1α (Novus Biologicals, CO), PPAR-α (Cell Signaling Technology), and OPA-1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) were used for immunochemical staining. Sirius red staining was performed using the Sirius Red Staining Kit (Polysciences, Warrington, PA, United Kingdom) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Samples were examined under a laser-scanning microscope (Eclipse TE300; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).

4.9. Quantification of Mitochondrial Superoxide by Flow Cytometry

Mitochondrial superoxide was detected in cells stained with MitoSOX (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA). After incubation for 10 min in the dark at 25°C, cells were analyzed using an Attune NxT Acoustic Focusing Cytometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA).

4.10. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS 11.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) and are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical comparisons among groups were determined using the Kruskal–Wallis test. Probability values of P < 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant.

Funding

This study was supported by Research Fund of Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea.

Acknowledgments

We thank Byung-Rok Do and Ji-Hyang Kim, Hurim BioCell Company, for providing human ASCs and for the technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pellicoro, A.; Ramachandran, P.; Iredale, J.P.; Fallowfield, J.A. Liver fibrosis and repair: Immune regulation of wound healing in a solid organ. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2014, 14, 181–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Geissler, S.; Textor, M.; Kuhnisch, J.; Konnig, D.; Klein, O.; Ode, A.; Pfitzner, T.; Adjaye, J.; Kasper, G.; Duda, G.N. Functional comparison of chronological and in vitro aging: Differential role of the cytoskeleton and mitochondria in mesenchymal stromal cells. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e52700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Phinney, D.G.; Pittenger, M.F. Concise Review: MSC-Derived Exosomes for Cell-Free Therapy. Stem Cells 2017, 35, 851–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Schieber, M.; Chandel, N.S. ROS function in redox signaling and oxidative stress. Curr. Biol. 2014, 24, R453–R462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sies, H.; Jones, D.P. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) as pleiotropic physiological signalling agents. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020, 21, 363–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Scarpulla, R.C. Metabolic control of mitochondrial biogenesis through the PGC-1 family regulatory network. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2011, 1813, 1269–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Austin, S.; St-Pierre, J. PGC1alpha and mitochondrial metabolism--emerging concepts and relevance in ageing and neurodegenerative disorders. J. Cell Sci. 2012, 125, 4963–4971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. LeBleu, V.S.; O'Connell, J.T.; Gonzalez Herrera, K.N.; Wikman, H.; Pantel, K.; Haigis, M.C.; de Carvalho, F.M.; Damascena, A.; Domingos Chinen, L.T.; Rocha, R.M.; et al. PGC-1alpha mediates mitochondrial biogenesis and oxidative phosphorylation in cancer cells to promote metastasis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2014, 16, 992–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Summermatter, S.; Santos, G.; Perez-Schindler, J.; Handschin, C. Skeletal muscle PGC-1alpha controls whole-body lactate homeostasis through estrogen-related receptor alpha-dependent activation of LDH B and repression of LDH A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U SA 2013, 110, 8738–8743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lai, L.; Leone, T.C.; Zechner, C.; Schaeffer, P.J.; Kelly, S.M.; Flanagan, D.P.; Medeiros, D.M.; Kovacs, A.; Kelly, D.P. Transcriptional coactivators PGC-1alpha and PGC-lbeta control overlapping programs required for perinatal maturation of the heart. Genes. Dev. 2008, 22, 1948–1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, Q.; Chen, W.; Xie, C.; Dai, X.; Ma, J.; Lu, J. The Role of PGC-1alpha in Digestive System Malignant Tumours. Anticancer. Agents Med. Chem. 2020, 20, 276–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, Y.; Shen, L.; Zhu, H.; Dreissigacker, K.; Distler, D.; Zhou, X.; Gyorfi, A.H.; Bergmann, C.; Meng, X.; Dees, C.; et al. PGC-1alpha regulates autophagy to promote fibroblast activation and tissue fibrosis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2020, 79, 1227–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wu, L.; Mo, W.; Feng, J.; Li, J.; Yu, Q.; Li, S.; Zhang, J.; Chen, K.; Ji, J.; Dai, W.; et al. Astaxanthin attenuates hepatic damage and mitochondrial dysfunction in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease by up-regulating the FGF21/PGC-1alpha pathway. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2020, 177, 3760–3777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lee, G.; Uddin, M.J.; Kim, Y.; Ko, M.; Yu, I.; Ha, H. PGC-1alpha, a potential therapeutic target against kidney aging. Aging Cell 2019, 18, e12994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chandrasekaran, K.; Anjaneyulu, M.; Inoue, T.; Choi, J.; Sagi, A.R.; Chen, C.; Ide, T.; Russell, J.W. Mitochondrial transcription factor A regulation of mitochondrial degeneration in experimental diabetic neuropathy. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 309, E132–E141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dorn, L.E.; Petrosino, J.M.; Wright, P.; Accornero, F. CTGF/CCN2 is an autocrine regulator of cardiac fibrosis. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 2018, 121, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Han, Y.; Xu, X.; Tang, C.; Gao, P.; Chen, X.; Xiong, X.; Yang, M.; Yang, S.; Zhu, X.; Yuan, S.; et al. Reactive oxygen species promote tubular injury in diabetic nephropathy: The role of the mitochondrial ros-txnip-nlrp3 biological axis. Redox Biol. 2018, 16, 32–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cheng, C.F.; Ku, H.C.; Lin, H. PGC-1alpha as a Pivotal Factor in Lipid and Metabolic Regulation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Baglio, S.R.; Rooijers, K.; Koppers-Lalic, D.; Verweij, F.J.; Perez Lanzon, M.; Zini, N.; Naaijkens, B.; Perut, F.; Niessen, H.W.; Baldini, N.; et al. Human bone marrow- and adipose-mesenchymal stem cells secrete exosomes enriched in distinctive miRNA and tRNA species. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2015, 6, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rani, S.; Ryan, A.E.; Griffin, M.D.; Ritter, T. Mesenchymal Stem Cell-derived Extracellular Vesicles: Toward Cell-free Therapeutic Applications. Mol. Ther. 2015, 23, 812–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sugden, M.C.; Caton, P.W.; Holness, M.J. PPAR control: it's SIRTainly as easy as PGC. J. Endocrinol. 2010, 204, 93–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Koliaki, C.; Szendroedi, J.; Kaul, K.; Jelenik, T.; Nowotny, P.; Jankowiak, F.; Herder, C.; Carstensen, M.; Krausch, M.; Knoefel, W.T.; et al. Adaptation of hepatic mitochondrial function in humans with non-alcoholic fatty liver is lost in steatohepatitis. Cell Metab. 2015, 21, 739–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Xie, Q.; Tian, T.; Chen, Z.; Deng, S.; Sun, K.; Xie, J.; Cai, X. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor (PPAR) in Regenerative Medicine: Molecular Mechanism for PPAR in Stem Cells' Adipocyte Differentiation. Curr. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2016, 11, 290–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tsuchida, T.; Friedman, S.L. Mechanisms of hepatic stellate cell activation. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 14, 397–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. PGC-Sec enhances cell viability and reduces mitochondrial oxidative stress in an in vitro model of liver injury. (A) Schematic representation of PGC-1α-overexpressing adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) generation by transfecting a plasmid encoding PGC-1α. (B) Cell viability assessment of control AML12 hepatocytes without treatment, and those treated with either Ctrl-Sec or PGC-Sec, showing a significant increase in cell viability upon PGC-Sec treatment in TAA-induced liver injury. (C) MitoSOX flow cytometry analysis of mitochondrial superoxide production in control AML12 cells and TAA-induced liver injury cells, indicating a significant reduction in MitoSOX fluorescence in both Ctrl-Sec and PGC-Sec treatment groups compared to the No Treatment group, with a more pronounced reduction in the PGC-Sec treatment group. Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments; * P < 0.05. Abbreviations: ASCs, adipose-derived stem cells; Ctrl-Sec, Control-secretome, PGC-Sec, PGC-1α-secretome; TAA, thioacetamide; MitoSOX, mitochondrial superoxide indicator.
Figure 1. PGC-Sec enhances cell viability and reduces mitochondrial oxidative stress in an in vitro model of liver injury. (A) Schematic representation of PGC-1α-overexpressing adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) generation by transfecting a plasmid encoding PGC-1α. (B) Cell viability assessment of control AML12 hepatocytes without treatment, and those treated with either Ctrl-Sec or PGC-Sec, showing a significant increase in cell viability upon PGC-Sec treatment in TAA-induced liver injury. (C) MitoSOX flow cytometry analysis of mitochondrial superoxide production in control AML12 cells and TAA-induced liver injury cells, indicating a significant reduction in MitoSOX fluorescence in both Ctrl-Sec and PGC-Sec treatment groups compared to the No Treatment group, with a more pronounced reduction in the PGC-Sec treatment group. Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments; * P < 0.05. Abbreviations: ASCs, adipose-derived stem cells; Ctrl-Sec, Control-secretome, PGC-Sec, PGC-1α-secretome; TAA, thioacetamide; MitoSOX, mitochondrial superoxide indicator.
Preprints 75363 g001
Figure 2. In vivo effects of PGC-Sec on hepatic enzyme activity and serum inflammatory cytokine concentrations in a mouse model of liver fibrosis. (A) Schematic representation of the experimental design, involving a methionine-choline-deficient (MCD) diet and secretome injections. (B) Serum liver enzyme levels (AST and ALT) demonstrating significant reductions in the secretome-treated groups (Ctrl-Sec & PGC-Sec) compared to the control group, with the PGC-Sec group exhibiting significantly lower levels than the Ctrl-Sec group. (C) Serum pro-inflammatory cytokine concentrations (IL-6 and TNF-α) showing significant decreases in the secretome-treated groups (Ctrl-Sec & PGC-Sec) compared to the control group, and a more pronounced reduction in the PGC-Sec group relative to the Ctrl-Sec group. Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments; * P < 0.05. Abbreviations: MCD, methionine-choline-deficient diet; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; IL-6, interleukin-6; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha; Ctrl-Sec, Control-secretome; PGC-Sec, PGC-1α-secretome.
Figure 2. In vivo effects of PGC-Sec on hepatic enzyme activity and serum inflammatory cytokine concentrations in a mouse model of liver fibrosis. (A) Schematic representation of the experimental design, involving a methionine-choline-deficient (MCD) diet and secretome injections. (B) Serum liver enzyme levels (AST and ALT) demonstrating significant reductions in the secretome-treated groups (Ctrl-Sec & PGC-Sec) compared to the control group, with the PGC-Sec group exhibiting significantly lower levels than the Ctrl-Sec group. (C) Serum pro-inflammatory cytokine concentrations (IL-6 and TNF-α) showing significant decreases in the secretome-treated groups (Ctrl-Sec & PGC-Sec) compared to the control group, and a more pronounced reduction in the PGC-Sec group relative to the Ctrl-Sec group. Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments; * P < 0.05. Abbreviations: MCD, methionine-choline-deficient diet; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; IL-6, interleukin-6; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha; Ctrl-Sec, Control-secretome; PGC-Sec, PGC-1α-secretome.
Preprints 75363 g002
Figure 3. In vivo effects of PGC-Sec on the expression of fibrosis-related markers and liver histology in a mouse model of liver fibrosis. (A) Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of pro-fibrogenic markers (collagen and TGF-β mRNA) showing significant reductions in the secretome injection groups (Ctrl-Sec & PGC-Sec) compared to the saline injection group, with a more pronounced decrease in the PGC-Sec group relative to the Ctrl-Sec group. (B) Western blot analysis of ColA1 (pro-fibrogenic) and TIMP (anti-fibrogenic) protein levels, demonstrating significantly lower ColA1 expression and higher TIMP expression in the secretome injection groups (Ctrl-Sec & PGC-Sec) compared to the saline injection group, and increased TIMP expression in the PGC-Sec group relative to the Ctrl-Sec group. The relative densities had been quantified using Image J software and then were normalized to the density of β-actin in each group. (C) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of liver specimens revealing a significant reduction in liver fibrosis severity in the secretome injection groups (Ctrl-Sec & PGC-Sec) compared to the saline injection group, with the greatest reduction observed in the PGC-Sec group. (D) Sirius red staining, showing a significant reduction in liver fibrosis in the secretome injection groups (Ctrl-Sec & PGC-Sec) compared to the saline injection group, with the most substantial reduction in the PGC-Sec group. Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments; * P < 0.05. Abbreviations: mRNA, messenger RNA; TGF-β, transforming growth factor-beta; ColA1, collagen type 1 alpha 1; TIMP, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin; Ctrl-Sec, Control-secretome; PGC-Sec, PGC-1α-secretome.
Figure 3. In vivo effects of PGC-Sec on the expression of fibrosis-related markers and liver histology in a mouse model of liver fibrosis. (A) Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of pro-fibrogenic markers (collagen and TGF-β mRNA) showing significant reductions in the secretome injection groups (Ctrl-Sec & PGC-Sec) compared to the saline injection group, with a more pronounced decrease in the PGC-Sec group relative to the Ctrl-Sec group. (B) Western blot analysis of ColA1 (pro-fibrogenic) and TIMP (anti-fibrogenic) protein levels, demonstrating significantly lower ColA1 expression and higher TIMP expression in the secretome injection groups (Ctrl-Sec & PGC-Sec) compared to the saline injection group, and increased TIMP expression in the PGC-Sec group relative to the Ctrl-Sec group. The relative densities had been quantified using Image J software and then were normalized to the density of β-actin in each group. (C) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of liver specimens revealing a significant reduction in liver fibrosis severity in the secretome injection groups (Ctrl-Sec & PGC-Sec) compared to the saline injection group, with the greatest reduction observed in the PGC-Sec group. (D) Sirius red staining, showing a significant reduction in liver fibrosis in the secretome injection groups (Ctrl-Sec & PGC-Sec) compared to the saline injection group, with the most substantial reduction in the PGC-Sec group. Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments; * P < 0.05. Abbreviations: mRNA, messenger RNA; TGF-β, transforming growth factor-beta; ColA1, collagen type 1 alpha 1; TIMP, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin; Ctrl-Sec, Control-secretome; PGC-Sec, PGC-1α-secretome.
Preprints 75363 g003
Figure 4. Immunohistochemistry validating the antifibrogenic effects of PGC-Sec in a mouse model of liver fibrosis. (A) PGC1α immunohistochemistry showing significantly elevated PGC1α expression in the PGC-Sec group. (B) OPA1 expression comparison across different groups, with the highest OPA1 expression observed in the PGC-Sec group, indicating enhanced mitochondrial function. (C) Collagen 1A immunohistochemistry revealing markedly reduced expression of the pro-fibrogenic marker in the PGC-Sec group. (D) PPARα immunohistochemistry showing significantly increased expression of the anti-fibrogenic marker in the PGC-Sec group (P < 0.05). These findings emphasize the profound impact of PGC-Sec treatment on enhancing mitochondrial biogenesis and function, as well as promoting anti-fibrosis processes, collectively highlighting its potential as a novel therapeutic strategy for liver fibrosis. Percentages of immunoreactive areas were measured using NIH image J and expressed as relative values to those in normal livers. Abbreviations: PGC1α, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha; OPA1, optic atrophy 1; Collagen 1A, collagen type 1 alpha 1; PPARα, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha; Ctrl-Sec, Control-secretome; PGC-Sec, PGC-1α-secretome.
Figure 4. Immunohistochemistry validating the antifibrogenic effects of PGC-Sec in a mouse model of liver fibrosis. (A) PGC1α immunohistochemistry showing significantly elevated PGC1α expression in the PGC-Sec group. (B) OPA1 expression comparison across different groups, with the highest OPA1 expression observed in the PGC-Sec group, indicating enhanced mitochondrial function. (C) Collagen 1A immunohistochemistry revealing markedly reduced expression of the pro-fibrogenic marker in the PGC-Sec group. (D) PPARα immunohistochemistry showing significantly increased expression of the anti-fibrogenic marker in the PGC-Sec group (P < 0.05). These findings emphasize the profound impact of PGC-Sec treatment on enhancing mitochondrial biogenesis and function, as well as promoting anti-fibrosis processes, collectively highlighting its potential as a novel therapeutic strategy for liver fibrosis. Percentages of immunoreactive areas were measured using NIH image J and expressed as relative values to those in normal livers. Abbreviations: PGC1α, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha; OPA1, optic atrophy 1; Collagen 1A, collagen type 1 alpha 1; PPARα, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha; Ctrl-Sec, Control-secretome; PGC-Sec, PGC-1α-secretome.
Preprints 75363 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated