Submitted:
12 April 2023
Posted:
13 April 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Material and Methods
1.1. Experimental Design
1.2. Sample Collection
1.3. Determination of Fat and Fatty Acids
1.4. DNA Extraction of Rumen Bacterial
1.6. Number of Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) and Species Classification of Rumen Bacterial
1.6.1. Number of OTUs
1.6.2. Species Classification
1.7. Analysis of Rumen Bacterial Alpha Diversity
1.8. Analysis of Rumen Bacterial Beta Diversity
1.9. Correlation Analysis
2. Results
2.1. Fat and Fatty Acids
2.2. Number of OTUs and Species Classification
2.2.1. Number of OTUs
2.2.2. Species Classification
2.3. Diversity of the Rumen Microbiome
2.3.1. Alpha Diversity
2.3.2. Beta Diversity
2.4. Analysis of the Structure of Rumen Bacteria
2.4.1. Phylum Level
2.4.2. Genus Level
2.5. Correlation Analysis
3. Discussion
4. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
References
- Anderson, F.; Pannier, L.; Pethick, D.; Gardner, G. Intramuscular fat in lamb muscle and the impact of selection for improved carcass lean meat yield. Animal 2015, 9, 1081–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bessa, R.; Santos-Silva, J.; Ribeiro, J.; Portugal, A. Reticulo-rumen biohydrogenation and the enrichment of ruminant edible products with linoleic acid conjugated isomers. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2000, 63, 201–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caporaso, J.G.; Kuczynski, J.; Stombaugh, J.; Bittinger, K.; Bushman, F.D.; Costello, E.K.; Fierer, N.; Gonzalez Peña, A.; Goodrich, J.K.; Gordon, J.I.; et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 2010, 7, 335–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Edgar, R.C. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 1792–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edgar, R.C. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat. Methods 2013, 10, 996–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ekiz, B. , Demirel, G., Yilmaz, A., Ozcana, M., Yalcintana, H., Kocaka, O., Altinel, A., 2013. Slaughter characteristics, carcass quality and fatty acid composition of lambs under four different production systems. Small Ruminant Research. 114(1), 26–34.
- Folch, J.; Lees, M.; Stanley, G.H.S. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J. Biol. Chem. 1957, 226, 497–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fu, Z.; Xu, X.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, L. Effect of different feeding methods on rumen microbes in growing Chinese Tan sheep. Rev. Bras. de Zootec. 2020, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, J.; Wang, M.-Z.; Jing, Y.-J.; Sun, X.-Z.; Wu, T.-Y.; Shi, L.-F. Impacts of the unsaturation degree of long-chain fatty acids on the volatile fatty acid profiles of rumen microbial fermentation in goats in vitro. J. Integr. Agric. 2016, 15, 2827–2833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grilli, D.J. , Fliegerová, K., Kopečný, J., PaezLama, S., Egea, V., Sohaefer, N., Pereyra, C., Ruiz, M.S., Sosa, M.A., Arenas, G.N., Mrázek, J., 2016. Analysis of the rumen bacterial diversity of goats during shift from forage to concentrate diet. Anaerobe. 42, 17–26.
- Holl, G. , Nuernberg, K., Repa, I., Holl, I., Seregi, J., Pohn, G., Ender, K., 2005. Effect of feeding on the composition of the intramuscular fat in longissimus muscle and different fatty tissues of Hungarian Grey and Holstein Friesian bulls. 1. Fatty acid profile. Archiv Fur Tierzucht. 48(6), 537–546.
- Jenkins, T.C.; Wallace, R.J.; Moate, P.J.; Mosley, E.E. BOARD-INVITED REVIEW: Recent advances in biohydrogenation of unsaturated fatty acids within the rumen microbial ecosystem1. J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 86, 397–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ji, S.K. , Jiang, C.G., Li, R., Diao, Q.Y., Tu, Y.N., Zhang, N.F., Si, B.W., 2016. Growth performance and rumen microorganism differ between segregated weaning lambs and pasturing lambs. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 15, 872–878.
- Juliana, D. , Marcos, I.M., Melline, F.N., Rafael, T.R., Fernanda, S.M., Hilrio, C.M., Kimberly, A.D.M., Garret, S., 2017. Effect of pre-weaning diet on the ruminal archaeal, bacterial, and fungal communities of dairy calves. Frontiers in Microbiology. 8, 1553.
- Kang, K.; Ma, J.; Wang, H.; Wang, Z.; Peng, Q.; Hu, R.; Zou, H.; Bao, S.; Zhang, W.; Sun, B. High-energy diet improves growth performance, meat quality and gene expression related to intramuscular fat deposition in finishing yaks raised by barn feeding. Veter- Med. Sci. 2020, 6, 755–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- L, González-Calvo, M, Joy, Blanco,E,Dervishi,F,Molino.,P2015. Effect of vitamin e supplementation or alfalfa grazing on fatty acid composition and expression of genes related to lipid metabolism in lambs. Journal of Animal Science.
- Li, F.; Zhang, Z.; Li, X.; Zhu, B.; Guo, L.; Li, F.; Weng, X. Effect of duration of linseed diet supplementation before slaughter on the performances, meat fatty acid composition and rumen bacterial community of fattening lambs. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2020, 263, 114457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lourenco, M. , Van Ranst, G., De Smet, S., Raes, K., & Fievez, V.,2007. Effect of grazing pastures with different botanical composition by lambs on rumen fatty acid metabolism and fatty acid pattern of longissimus muscle and subcutaneous fat. Animal An International Journal of Animal Bioscience, 1(04), 537-545.
- Majewska, M.P.; Miltko, R.; Krawczyńska, A.; Bełżecki, G.; Kowalik, B. Rapeseed and linseed oil supplementation affects hydrolytic activities in the rumen of sheep. Livest. Sci. 2020, 240, 104175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nie, C.; Hu, Y.; Chen, R.; Guo, B.; Li, L.; Chen, H.; Chen, H.; Song, X. Effect of probiotics and Chinese medicine polysaccharides on meat quality, muscle fibre type and intramuscular fat deposition in lambs. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2022, 21, 811–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olinda, Guerreiro, Susana, P., Alves, & David, et al., 2022. Inclusion of the aerial part and condensed tannin extract from cistus ladanifer l. in lamb diets - effects on growth performance, carcass and meat quality and fatty acid composition of intramuscular and subcutaneous fat. Meat science, 160, 107945.
- Osborne, J.M.; Dehority, B.A. Synergism in Degradation and Utilization of Intact Forage Cellulose, Hemicellulose, and Pectin by Three Pure Cultures of Ruminal Bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1989, 55, 2247–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Okeudo, N.; Moss, B. Interrelationships amongst carcass and meat quality characteristics of sheep. Meat Sci. 2005, 69, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- A Paz, H.; E Hales, K.; E Wells, J.; A Kuehn, L.; Freetly, H.C.; Berry, E.D.; Flythe, M.D.; Spangler, M.L.; Fernando, S.C. Rumen bacterial community structure impacts feed efficiency in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 96, 1045–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Polan, C.E.; McNeill, J.J.; Tove, S.B. BIOHYDROGENATION OF UNSATURATED FATTY ACIDS BY RUMEN BACTERIA. J. Bacteriol. 1964, 88, 1056–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rui Hu, Huawei Zou, Hongze Wang, 2020. Dietary Energy Levels Affect Rumen Bacterial Populations that Influence the Intramuscular Fat Fatty Acids of Fattening Yaks (Bos grunniens)[J]. Animals, 10(1474):1-16.
- Stevenson, D.M.; Weimer, P.J. Dominance of Prevotella and low abundance of classical ruminal bacterial species in the bovine rumen revealed by relative quantification real-time PCR. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 83, 987–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.L. , Hao, Z.L., Li, F.D., Yu, Y., Lang, X., Ma, Y.J., Nian, F., Guo, J.P., 2010. Anatomical changes of digestive tract and rumen functional development in pasturing lamb at the age of 0-56 d. Chinese Journal of Animal & Veterinary Sciences. 41, 417–424.
- Wijngaarden, V.D. , 1967. Modified rapid preparation of fatty acid ester from lipids for gas chromatographic analysis. Analytical Chemistry. 39(7), 848–849.
- Wu, G.D.; Lewis, J.D.; Hoffmann, C.; Chen, Y.-Y.; Knight, R.; Bittinger, K.; Hwang, J.; Chen, J.; Berkowsky, R.; Nessel, L.; et al. Sampling and pyrosequencing methods for characterizing bacterial communities in the human gut using 16S sequence tags. BMC Microbiol. 2010, 10, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xiao, J.; Guo, L.; Alugongo, G.; Wang, Y.; Cao, Z.; Li, S. Effects of different feed type exposure in early life on performance, rumen fermentation, and feed preference of dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 8169–8181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xie, B. , Zhang, N.F., Zhang, C.X., Diao, Q.Y., 2018. Effect of roughage on rumen development of young ruminants and its mechanism. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition. 30, 1245–1252.
- Yáñez-Ruiz, D.R.; Macías, B.; Pinloche, E.; Newbold, C.J. The persistence of bacterial and methanogenic archaeal communities residing in the rumen of young lambs. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2010, 72, 272–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, H.B. , Liu, H., Zhan, J.S., Lin, M., Zhao, G.Q., 2015. Effects of diet pellets with different concentrate-roughage ratios on rumen fermentation parameters and microorganism abundance in weaned bull calves. Acta Prataculturae Sinica. 12, 131–138.
- Zappaterra, M. , Deserti, M., Mazza, R., Braglia, S., Zambonelli, P., & Davoli, R.,2016. A gene and protein expression study on four porcine genes related to intramuscular fat deposition. Meat Science, 121(nov.), 27-32.
- Zened, A.; Combes, S.; Cauquil, L.; Mariette, J.; Klopp, C.; Bouchez, O.; Troegeler-Meynadier, A.; Enjalbert, F. Microbial ecology of the rumen evaluated by 454 GS FLX pyrosequencing is affected by starch and oil supplementation of diets. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2013, 83, 504–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, Y.S. , Yan, S.M., Sun, G.P., 2018. Effects of two fattening methods on rumen fermentation function of Aerbasi white cashmere goat lambs. Feed Industry. 11, 29–32.










| Ingredient | Content | Nutrient Level | Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corn | 55 | Crude protein | 20.50 |
| Soybean meal | 30 | Ca | 0.73 |
| Wheat bran | 7 | P | 0.44 |
| Molasses | 5 | Neutral detergent fibre | 10.35 |
| CaHPO4 | 1.50 | Digestible energy (MJ/kg) 2) | 11.60 |
| NaCl | 1 | ||
| Premix 1) | 0.50 | ||
| Total | 100 |
| Item | Biceps Femoris | Longissimus Dorsi | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pen-Ration Group | Pasture Group | SEM | p-Value | Pen-Ration Group | Pasture Group | SEM | p-Value | |
| Fat (%) | 2.26 | 2.11 | 0.18 | 0.316 | 1.73 | 1.98 | 0.21 | 0.242 |
| C6 | 0.94 | 0.11 | 0.03 | 0.002 | 0.23 | 0.09 | 0.02 | 0.026 |
| C8 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.186 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.073 |
| C11 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.068 | 0.33 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.008 |
| C12 | 0.80 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.001 | 0.61 | 0.55 | 0.02 | 0.062 |
| C13 | 0.11 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.003 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.003 |
| C14 | 6.65 | 6.72 | 0.27 | 0.154 | 6.42 | 8.82 | 0.30 | 0.131 |
| C14:1 | 0.49 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.005 | 0.37 | 0.15 | 0.02 | 0.035 |
| C15 | 1.09 | 0.20 | 0.03 | 0.001 | 0.82 | 1.24 | 0.04 | 0.108 |
| C16 | 66.89 | 48.73 | 2.31 | 0.000 | 71.32 | 50.40 | 2.43 | 0.002 |
| C16:1 | 2.71 | 2.14 | 0.10 | 0.132 | 2.93 | 3.08 | 0.12 | 0.055 |
| C17 | 2.24 | 4.47 | 0.13 | 0.569 | 2.12 | 3.17 | 0.11 | 0.058 |
| C18:1n9t | 2.61 | 3.18 | 0.12 | 0.135 | 2.73 | 2.66 | 0.11 | 0.065 |
| c18:2n6c | 9.56 | 16.89 | 0.53 | 0.002 | 7.52 | 16.30 | 0.48 | 0.013 |
| c20 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.05 | 0.231 | 0.02 | 0.21 | 0.01 | 0.032 |
| c18:3n6 | 0.29 | 0.26 | 0.06 | 0.060 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.05 | 0.089 |
| c18:3n3 | 0.69 | 4.17 | 0.10 | 0.003 | 0.53 | 3.48 | 0.08 | 0.000 |
| c20:4n6 | 4.29 | 7.99 | 0.25 | 0.036 | 3.55 | 6.45 | 0.20 | 0.021 |
| c20:5n3 | 0.18 | 3.10 | 0.07 | 0.000 | 0.11 | 2.30 | 0.05 | 0.000 |
| c22:6n3 | 0.23 | 1.64 | 0.09 | 0.031 | 0.05 | 0.75 | 0.02 | 0.006 |
| Items | Pasture Group | Pen-Ration Group | SEM | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTU | 1611.200 | 694.000 | 32.689 | 0.001 |
| ACE index | 1913.600 | 970.900 | 35.121 | 0.001 |
| Chao1 index | 1910.265 | 951.180 | 33.675 | 0.001 |
| Shannon index | 7.709 | 3.770 | 0.271 | 0.000 |
| Simpson index | 0.985 | 0.785 | 0.008 | 0.001 |
| Coverage | 0.998 | 0.996 | 0.001 | 0.069 |
| Phylum | Pasture Group | Pen-Ration Group | SEM | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacteroidetes | 69.371 | 43.600 | 1.768 | 0.001 |
| Firmicutes | 15.656 | 9.669 | 0.379 | 0.010 |
| Fibrobacteres | 4.627 | 0.007 | 0.001 | 0.024 |
| Verrucomicrobia | 4.073 | 0.030 | 0.085 | 0.007 |
| Proteobacteria | 2.644 | 45.795 | 0.713 | 0.000 |
| Spirochaetae | 1.564 | 0.096 | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Cyanobacteria | 0.669 | 0.573 | 0.002 | 0.739 |
| Lentisphaerae | 0.433 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Planctomycetes | 0.319 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.016 |
| SR1 | 0.169 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.039 |
| Tenericutes | 0.137 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Saccharibacteria | 0.097 | 0.021 | 0.000 | 0.024 |
| Elusimicrobia | 0.093 | 0.018 | 0.000 | 0.009 |
| Synergistetes | 0.078 | 0.108 | 0.000 | 0.412 |
| Bacteria_NA | 0.030 | 0.016 | 0.000 | 0.071 |
| Actinobacteria | 0.026 | 0.065 | 0.000 | 0.076 |
| Euryarchaeota | 0.010 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Armatimonadetes | 0.002 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.012 |
| WA-aaa01f12 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.060 |
| Chloroflexi | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.245 |
| Fusobacteria | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.621 |
| Genus | Pasture Group | Pen-Ration Group | SEM | P-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prevotella | 25.88 | 36.48 | 1.032 | 0.005 |
| Prevotellaceae_NA | 4.846 | 3.827 | 0.015 | 0.671 |
| Prevotellaceae_UCG-003 | 4.350 | 0.077 | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Prevotellaceae_UCG-001 | 3.756 | 1.252 | 0.002 | 0.066 |
| Prevotellaceae_NK3B31_group | 0.859 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group | 10.664 | 0.621 | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Rikenellaceae_NA | 0.400 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.021 |
| NA | 8.907 | 1.049 | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Bacteroidales_BS11_gut_group_NA | 6.696 | 0.051 | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bacteroidales_UCG-001_NA | 3.349 | 0.024 | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bacteroidales_S24-7_group_NA | 2.682 | 0.443 | 0.001 | 0.113 |
| Bacteroidales_RF16_group_NA | 1.501 | 0.112 | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Fibrobacter | 4.627 | 0.007 | 0.000 | 0.016 |
| Lachnospiraceae_NA | 1.687 | 1.087 | 0.961 | 0.057 |
| Lachnospiraceae_XPB1014_group | 0.991 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.034 |
| Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136_group | 0.324 | 0.025 | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Treponema_2 | 1.388 | 0.068 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Succiniclasticum | 1.057 | 1.241 | 0.002 | 0.332 |
| Succinivibrionaceae_UCG-001 | 0.455 | 39.047 | 0.232 | 0.000 |
| Succinivibrionaceae_UCG-002 | 0.965 | 0.003 | 0.001 | 0.046 |
| Succinivibrionaceae_NA | 0.099 | 6.378 | 0.123 | 0.036 |
| Christensenellaceae_R-7_group | 1.083 | 0.029 | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Christensenellaceae_NA | 0.014 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.007 |
| Erysipelotrichaceae_UCG-004 | 0.805 | 0.128 | 0.001 | 0.013 |
| SP3-e08 | 0.509 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.006 |
| Ruminococcus_1 | 0.326 | 0.079 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Ruminococcus_2 | 0.188 | 0.015 | 0.001 | 0.011 |
| Ruminococcaceae_UCG-014 | 0.940 | 0.612 | 0.253 | 0.247 |
| Ruminococcaceae_NA | 0.782 | 0.137 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Ruminococcaceae_UCG-010 | 0.606 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Ruminococcaceae_UCG-002 | 0.573 | 0.115 | 0.010 | 0.012 |
| Ruminobacter | 0.325 | 0.031 | 0.009 | 0.273 |
| Saccharofermentans | 0.354 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Butyrivibrio_2 | 0.331 | 0.027 | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Pseudobutyrivibrio | 0.043 | 0.003 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).