Preprint
Review

This version is not peer-reviewed.

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Automated Assessment of Progressive Neurological Disorders with Speech Signals: A Systematic Review

Submitted:

13 February 2026

Posted:

15 February 2026

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Background/Objectives: The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has had a notable impact in the healthcare field, particularly in the realm of assessment and diagnosis. One specific area where the integration of AI technologies shows promise is the evaluation of progressive neurological disorders (PNDs). PNDs are characterized by a progressive decline in neurological function, resulting in changes in cognition, movement, and communication. PNDs pose significant challenges in terms of early detection and categorization. Speech and voice changes are important clinical markers in many PNDs. Therefore, the utilization of AI applications for the analysis and classification of speech and voice samples could prove beneficial for streamlining the diagnostic process. This systematic review aimed to investigate the current utilization of AI in the assessment and diagnosis of PNDs through speech signal analysis over the past decade. Methods: In adherence to PRISMA guidelines, Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched for studies related to machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) for speech and voice assessment in people with PNDs. Results: A total of 102 studies were identified for inclusion between 2013 and 2023. The reviewed studies demonstrated a wide range of accuracy, with reported values ranging from 67.43% to 99%. Support Vector Machines (SVMs) were the most frequently used ML models across studies, demonstrating reliable performance in both speech and voice data analysis. Conclusions: AI-based analysis of speech and voice shows strong potential as a non-invasive tool for supporting the assessment and diagnosis of PNDs. The high accuracy reported across studies highlights the promise of these approaches, although methodological variability underscores the need for greater standardization and clinical validation.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated