1. Introduction
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic metabolic disorder characterized by sustained hyperglycemia resulting from impaired insulin secretion and/or reduced insulin sensitivity [
1]. At present, ~ 537 million adults are affected by diabetes worldwide, of which T2DM accounts for nearly 90%, and this figure may rise to 783 million by 2045, with incidence continuing to increase [
2]. Notably, T2DM is largely irreversible once established, and dysfunction of the liver, kidneys, and cardiovascular system represents frequent complications, for which effective therapeutic approaches to reverse organ injury remain limited [
3]. NAFLD is a metabolic disorder defined by excessive lipid accumulation in hepatocytes after exclusion of alcohol consumption and other identifiable causes of liver injury [
4]. Evidence indicates that obesity and insulin resistance constitute shared pathogenic drivers of both NAFLD and T2DM [
5], and the two conditions commonly coexist and interact synergistically. Their relationship is considered bidirectional: T2DM accelerates NAFLD progression by enhancing hepatic lipogenesis and suppressing fatty acid oxidation, whereas NAFLD aggravates insulin resistance through the release of free fatty acids and pro-inflammatory mediators, thereby elevating the risk of T2DM complication [
6]. In the presence of concurrent T2DM and NAFLD, patients exhibit more severe insulin resistance, along with a markedly increased risk of liver fibrosis progression and cardiovascular events, imposing substantial burdens on quality of life and public health system [
7]. Current clinical management relies primarily on lifestyle modification combined with hypoglycemic, lipid-lowering, and hepatoprotective agents; however, these approaches are constrained by limited efficacy, adverse effects, and the complexity of polypharmacy [
8]. Integrated therapeutic strategies capable of simultaneously targeting T2DM, NAFLD, and their associated complications remain insufficient. Consequently, the identification of novel interventions with multi-target and systemic regulatory properties is essential for interrupting the pathogenic interplay between T2DM and NAFLD and improving overall metabolic health.
Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) is founded on syndrome differentiation and a holistic therapeutic framework. The concept that distinct diseases may be managed using similar therapeutic strategies, as guided by TCM theory, offers a distinctive perspective for addressing complex comorbid conditions. Owing to its broad availability and accessibility, TCM is associated with a lower incidence of adverse drug reactions compared with chemical pharmaceuticals and achieves synergistic therapeutic effects through multi-target and multi-pathway regulation. Accordingly, TCM demonstrates particular strengths in the management of chronic and refractory diseases [
9]. Astragalus root is a classical qi-tonifying herb in TCM, derived from the leguminous plant
Astragalus membranaceus (Fisch.) Bge. var.
mongholicus (Bge.) Hsiao. Over many years of clinical application, astragalus root has exhibited therapeutic potential in the treatment of consumptive thirst (analogous to T2DM) and liver–spleen disharmony, attributable to its pharmacological activities, including glycemic control, lipid regulation, anti-inflammatory effects, and improvement of hepatic steatosis [
10]. Contemporary studies have demonstrated that total astragalosides derived from astragalus root can ameliorate T2DM by modulating gut microbiota homeostasis, enhancing hepatic insulin signaling, suppressing hepatic glucose production, and promoting glycogen synthesis [
11]. Astragalus polysaccharides have been shown to attenuate hepatic inflammation and lipid accumulation in NAFLD through regulation of gut microbiota and the SCFA-GPR signaling pathway [
12]. In addition, astragaloside has been reported to mitigate diabetic liver injury in T2DM rat models by activating AMPK/mTOR-mediated autophagy [
13]. Thus, these observations indicate that astragalus root may exert broad regulatory effects through the coordinated actions of multiple bioactive constituents. Although the therapeutic potential of astragalus root and its bioactive constituents in T2DM and NAFLD has been supported by clinical evidence, the precise mechanisms underlying its effects on this comorbid state remain unclear, particularly with respect to its integrated regulation of shared pathological networks involving insulin resistance, lipid metabolism disorders, and chronic inflammation. Such uncertainty substantially constrains its precise clinical application and modernization of drug development. Accordingly, a systematic elucidation of the material basis and mechanistic pathways through which astragalus root intervenes in T2DM-NAFLD comorbidity holds substantial value for informing novel clinical therapeutic strategies.
With the rapid advancement of bioinformatics and big data analytics, the integration of informatics technologies has assumed an increasingly important role in elucidating the mechanisms underlying TCM, demonstrating broad potential in the investigation of chronic diseases, tumors, and immune regulation. Within this framework, network pharmacology has emerged as a key approach for analyzing the complex systems inherent to TCM and is frequently combined with molecular docking and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation [
14]. Molecular docking and simulation are widely applied in the identification of candidate compounds and in the delineation of pathological pathways associated with comorbid conditions through detailed characterization of drug–target interactions, thereby providing a theoretical foundation for the optimization of combination therapeutic strategies [
15].
At present, an integrated research strategy combining network pharmacology, molecular docking, MD simulation, and in vitro experimental validation has become a prevailing paradigm for systematically clarifying the mechanisms by which TCM intervenes in complex diseases, including metabolic comorbidities. In this study, the potential mechanisms by which Astragalus root treats T2DM-NAFLD were investigated using the above four approaches, with systematic identification of key targets and signaling pathways (
Figure 1). This approach was designed to provide deeper insight into shared therapeutic targets for comorbid diseases through the integration of traditional medical theory with modern pharmacological methodologies.
3. Discussion
T2DM frequently coexists with NAFLD and represents one of the most significant risk factors contributing to NAFLD progression [
16]. In recent years, TCM has demonstrated systemic regulatory advantages through multi-target and multi-pathway actions in the prevention and management of complex disorders such as T2DM and NAFLD. Bioactive constituents derived from Astragalus root have exhibited notable therapeutic potential. Previous studies have reported that Astragalus polysaccharides markedly alleviate hepatic lipid accumulation and inflammatory responses in NAFLD model rats, whereas astragaloside exerts significant anti-oxidative stress and anti-inflammatory effects in T2DM models [
17,
18]. Nevertheless, investigations focusing on the comorbid state of T2DM-NAFLD remain comparatively limited. Network pharmacology, molecular docking, and MD simulation provide efficient strategies for identifying bioactive compounds and their potential molecular targets. In the present study, formononetin, a representative constituent of Astragalus root, was selected and analyzed to elucidate its therapeutic mechanisms in the context of T2DM-NAFLD comorbidity.
This study systematically identified six key targets—IL-6, AKT1, JUN, TNF, CASP3, and ESR1—through integrated network pharmacology analysis, molecular docking, and MD simulation, indicating that these molecules may represent potential therapeutic targets of astragalus root in T2DM-NAFLD. These targets are jointly involved in the shared pathological mechanisms underlying T2DM and NAFLD. IL-6 is a multifunctional cytokine implicated in the regulation of inflammatory responses and hepatic regeneration and has been associated with the progression of insulin resistance [
19]. TNF-α is recognized as an inflammatory mediator closely linked to NAFLD pathogenesis and may promote hepatic insulin resistance, thereby connecting inflammatory signaling with metabolic dysregulation and contributing to NAFLD-related comorbidities [
20]. AKT1 functions as a central kinase governing metabolism, cell growth, and survival, mediating key insulin-driven processes such as glucose uptake and lipid metabolism, and represents a critical node in the development of both T2DM and NAFLD [
21,
22]. CASP3, a principal effector of apoptosis, is involved in the regulation of programmed cell death and has been implicated in the pathophysiology of T2DM and NAFLD [
23,
24]. ESR1 is important in regulating glucose and lipid metabolism and hepatic homeostasis and interacts with AKT1 and TNF-α through signaling pathway crosstalk, collectively contributing to the initiation and progression of T2DM-NAFLD comorbidity [
25,
26]. Molecular docking analysis demonstrated that formononetin, a major bioactive constituent of astragalus root, exhibited strong binding affinity toward these targets. MD simulations further indicated that the formononetin–target complexes possessed favorable conformational stability, characterized by limited backbone fluctuations, persistent key hydrogen bonds throughout the simulation, and deep Gibbs free energy minima derived from binding free energy calculations. Collectively, these results substantiate the robustness of the analytical strategy employed and support the therapeutic potential of astragalus root in the management of T2DM-NAFLD comorbidity.
GO functional enrichment analysis delineated the potential biological mechanisms through which astragalus root intervened in T2DM-NAFLD, demonstrating close associations with key functional modules, including response to peptide hormones, membrane rafts, and histone kinase activity. KEGG analysis further identified the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway as a central pathway involved in T2DM-NAFLD comorbidity. This pathway is known to regulate insulin sensitivity, cell survival, and metabolic processes and is tightly linked to glycemic homeostasis in T2DM as well as the development of hepatic lipid metabolism disorders in complications such as NAFLD [
27,
28]. Regulation of PI3K-AKT signaling has been widely recognized as an effective approach for ameliorating metabolic dysfunction in T2DM and NAFLD. For instance, curcumin has been reported to enhance insulin sensitivity and slow diabetes progression through modulation of the PI3K-AKT pathway [
29]. Ginseng polypeptides could alleviate hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, and multi-organ injury in db/db mice via PI3K-AKT–mediated signaling [
30]. Mulberry polyphenols regulate genes involved in lipid metabolism and inflammation, with their effects closely associated with PI3K-AKT pathway modulation [
31]. In addition, Compound Pearl Lipid-Lowering Capsules have demonstrated protective effects in T2DM-NAFLD models through regulation of PI3K-AKT signaling [
32]. Collectively, these studies support the therapeutic relevance of targeting the PI3K-AKT pathway. Consistently, network pharmacology analysis in the present study also identified PI3K-AKT signaling as a major mechanism through which formononetin mediated its regulatory effects.
Based on bioinformatics analyses, the therapeutic potential of formononetin, a representative bioactive constituent of astragalus root, was further evaluated using an in vitro T2DM-NAFLD cell model, with emphasis on three core pathological processes: lipid accumulation, oxidative stress, and inflammatory response. Within the spectrum of NAFLD, factors related to hepatic lipid deposition, mitochondrial oxidative capacity, and lipoprotein secretion contribute to an increased risk of T2DM in affected individuals [
33]. When T2DM and NAFLD coexist, the impact of these pathogenic factors is further amplified. Consequently, patients with T2DM-NAFLD comorbidity frequently exhibit pathological features such as excessive intracellular lipid droplet accumulation and elevated TC and TG levels [
34]. Experimental observations demonstrated that formononetin markedly reduced intracellular lipid deposition and downregulated TC and TG levels, providing preliminary evidence for its capacity to ameliorate hepatic lipid metabolism disturbances. Oxidative stress and inflammation represent major drivers in the initiation and progression of both T2DM and NAFLD. Previous studies have shown that inflammatory mediators, including TNF-α and IL-6, interact synergistically with oxidative stress, forming a vicious pathological cycle in T2DM-NAFLD [
35]. Clinical evidence has further indicated a strong association between alterations in antioxidant defense markers, such as SOD, GSH-Px, and GSH, and lipid peroxidation levels in patients with T2DM-NAFLD [
36]. In addition, ectopic lipid accumulation and dysregulated serum lipid profiles characterized by elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol promote the activation and release of deleterious cytokines and chemokines, including IL-6, TNF-α, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, and cell adhesion molecules, which are hallmarks of T2DM-NAFLD [
37]. Consistently, elevated levels of TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, ROS, and MDA, along with reduced GSH content and SOD activity, were observed in the T2DM-NAFLD model. Intervention with formononetin significantly reversed these alterations in pro-inflammatory and oxidative stress–related indicators, indicating that its beneficial effects may be mediated through attenuation of oxidative damage and inflammatory responses. Overall, it shows that formononetin exerts therapeutic effects in T2DM-NAFLD comorbidity by modulating lipid accumulation, oxidative stress, and inflammation.
The PI3K/Akt/mTOR is a major intracellular signaling pathway involved in multiple physiological processes, including apoptosis, hepatic gluconeogenesis, and cell cycle regulation [
38]. PI3K comprises a family of kinases that catalyze phosphorylation of phosphatidylinositol at the 3-position, thereby participating in inositol lipid metabolism via second messengers and transmitting insulin signals via interaction with IRS-2 [
39]. AKT functions as a direct downstream effector of PI3K and mediates diverse insulin-related biological activities, primarily regulating glucose uptake and lipid metabolism [
40]. Phosphorylation of PI3K represents a key event in pathway activation and requires the involvement of mTOR. mTOR acts as a central regulatory protein controlling multiple physiological functions. Once PI3K is phosphorylated, downstream AKT is rapidly activated and subsequently promotes mTOR activation, a sequence of events that contributes to insulin resistance and accelerates the progression of T2DM [
41]. In addition, activation of mTOR suppresses autophagy at early stages through regulation of the Atg1–Atg13 complex. Given the intricate interplay between PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling and autophagic processes, this pathway is closely associated with NAFLD pathogenesis [
42]. Previous investigations have demonstrated that suppression of pathway phosphorylation can modulate intracellular lipid metabolism and attenuate inflammatory responses [
43]. Expressions of total PI3K and its phosphorylated form reflect pathway activation status and downstream signal transduction efficiency [
44]. In high-fat diet–induced NAFLD animal models, inhibition of PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling can alleviate hepatocellular injury and lipid metabolic disturbances [
45]. Consistent with these observations, RT-qPCR and Western blot analyses revealed elevated expression of p-PI3K, p-Akt, and p-mTOR in HepG2 cells from the model group, indicating activation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. Following formononetin treatment, protein levels of p-PI3K, p-Akt, and p-mTOR were markedly reduced in HepG2 cells. These results indicate that modulation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway represents a potential mechanism by which formononetin exerts protective effects against T2DM-NAFLD comorbidity.
In summary, the present study systematically identified the potential therapeutic targets of formononetin, a bioactive constituent of astragalus root, in T2DM-NAFLD through integrated network pharmacology analysis across multiple databases, in combination with molecular docking, MD simulation, and in vitro experimental validation, thereby offering valuable insights for clinical translation. Despite the translational relevance of these results, several limitations warrant further investigation. First, the in vivo blood entry characteristics, core bioactivity, and correspondence between formononetin and its molecular targets remain insufficiently defined. Future studies should address these issues through animal-based pharmacokinetic analyses and in vivo target validation. Second, experimental verification was limited to the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway, while its upstream and downstream regulatory networks and more detailed mechanistic features have yet to be elucidated. Subsequent investigations integrating multi-omics approaches and clinical sample analyses are required to clarify the underlying molecular mechanisms and to further substantiate the clinical relevance.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Reagents and Materials
Formononetin (FM, batch No. HF012465) was obtained from Baoji Chenguang Biotechnology Co., Ltd., China. Oil Red O powder (batch No. O0625) and bovine serum albumin (BSA) (batch No. SRE0096) were sourced from Sigma-Aldrich, USA. D- (+)-Glucose anhydrous (batch No. G8150) was provided by Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd., China. High-glucose DMEM medium (batch No. 12491015), fetal bovine serum (FBS) (batch No. 12664025), and penicillin-streptomycin solution (batch No. 15140-122) used for cell culture were supplied by Gibco, USA. The total cholesterol (TC) (batch No. E1015) and triglyceride (TG) (batch No. E1013) assay kits were purchased from Applygen Technologies Inc., Beijing, China. Assay kits for the detection of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (batch No. E-BC-K138-F), glutathione (GSH) (batch No. E-BC-K030-S), superoxide dismutase (SOD) (batch No. E-BC-K020-M), and malondialdehyde (MDA) (batch No. E-BC-K028-M) were provided by Elabscience Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Wuhan. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits for tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) (batch No. KE10002), interleukin-6 (IL-6) (batch No. KE10091), and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) (batch No. KE10003) were purchased from Wuhan San Ying Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Wuhan. All antibodies, including PI3K (batch No. 4257T), p-PI3K (batch No. 17366S), AKT (batch No. 9272S), p-AKT (batch No. 4060T), mTOR (batch No. 2972S), p-mTOR (batch No. 5536T), and β-actin (batch No. 8457T), were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology, USA, and all procedures were strictly performed according to the manufacturers’ instructions.
4.2. Network Pharmacology Analysis
4.2.1. Disease-Related Targets of T2DM and NAFLD
To identify genes related to T2DM and NAFLD, four databases (GeneCards, PharmGKB, OMIM, and TTD) were systematically queried using the keywords “T2DM” and “NAFLD.” The search parameters were defined with a GeneCards relevance score threshold of ≥ 1. Following duplicate removal and data integration, gene sets associated with T2DM and NAFLD were obtained.
4.2.2. Drug Targets of Astragalus Root
Bioactive constituents of Astragalus root were retrieved from the TCMSP database (OB ≥ 30% and DL ≥ 0.18). Corresponding target proteins of these constituents were predicted using the SwissTargetPrediction database. The overlap between the predicted drug targets and the disease-related targets of T2DM and NAFLD was defined as the potential targets of Astragalus root in treating T2DM-NAFLD comorbidity.
4.2.3. GO and KEGG Analyses
To study the mechanisms by which astragalus root intervenes in T2DM-NAFLD, GO and KEGG analyses were conducted on the intersecting genes. A P < 0.05 (threshold) was applied to identify significantly enriched terms, and the top-ranked results were visualized using bubble plots and Sankey diagrams.
4.2.4. PPI Network
A PPI network was generated using the STRING database, incorporating co-expressed genes associated with T2DM-NAFLD and 152 target genes related to astragalus root-T2DM-NAFLD. The organism was restricted to Homo sapiens, and the interaction confidence score was set at 0.40. For network visualization and quantitative assessment of node centrality, interaction data in TSV format were obtained from STRING and imported into Cytoscape software (version 3.6.0), followed by analysis using the CytoHubba plugin.
4.2.5. Identification of Hub Genes
Core regulatory genes were systematically identified from the T2DM-NAFLD co-expression network and the astragalus root–T2DM-NAFLD target network using the CytoHubba module in Cytoscape software (v3.6.0). Within the T2DM-NAFLD co-expression network, four topological algorithms were applied to calculate node centrality: Degree, reflecting direct connectivity; EPC, assessing network robustness; MCC, representing density-weighted clustering; and MNC, indicating local network scale. Nodes were ranked according to each algorithm, and the top 10 candidates were extracted. Final hub genes were defined by the strict intersection of the results derived from all four analytical methods.
4.3. Molecular Docking
Bioactive constituents of astragalus root were retrieved from the PubChem database. Solvent molecules were removed using PyMOL software, followed by hydrogen addition and charge assignment with AutoDock Tools version 1.5.6. The bioactive constituents were docked with the six previously identified core targets, and compounds exhibiting favorable docking scores across all six targets were designated as core components.
4.4. MD Simulation
MD simulation was conducted to further validate and characterize protein–ligand binding interactions. MD simulations of the protein–ligand complexes were performed using the GROMACS 2025.3 software package. Each system was embedded in a periodic cubic box, solvated with the AMBER14SB force field and the TIP3P water model, and topology files for small molecules were generated by sobtop program. Counterions were introduced to achieve physiological ionic strength (150 mM NaCl). Following energy minimization and stepwise NPT equilibration under positional constraints (100 ps), a 100 ns production run was carried out with a 2 fs integration time step. Simulation trajectories were processed to eliminate periodic boundary effects and to recenter the system. Subsequent analyses included calculation of the RMSD and Rg of protein backbone Cα atoms, RMSF of individual residues, solvent-accessible surface area (SASA), and the number of protein–ligand hydrogen bonds.
MM-PBSA approach was applied to estimate the binding free energy (ΔGbind). In addition, 2D and 3D free energy landscapes (FEL) were constructed to visualize conformational stability of the complexes. These landscapes, defined by Rg and RMSD coordinates, depicted the free energy distribution within conformational space, in which deep blue low-energy regions represented global minima corresponding to thermodynamically stable conformations.
4.5. Cell Culture and Treatment
HepG2 cells (batch No.TCH-C196) were obtained from Suzhou Haixing Biosciences Co., Ltd. and maintained in high-glucose DMEM (10% FBS and 1% penicillin–streptomycin). Cultures were incubated under conditions of 37 °C and 5% CO2. The T2DM-NAFLD cellular model was established by exposure to free fatty acids (oleic acid/palmitic acid, 2:1) at 0.01 mM/mL in combination with high glucose (75 mM/L) for 24 hours at 37 °C.
4.6. Cell Viability Assay
Cells were seeded into 96-well plates at 1 × 104 cells/well and cultured for 24 hours. Subsequently, treatment with graded concentrations of the test compound was performed for an additional 24 hours. After treatment, CCK-8 reagent (10 µL) was added to each well and incubated at 37 °C for 3 hours. Absorbance at 450 nm was measured using a microplate reader.
4.7. Oil Red O Staining
HepG2 cells were seeded into 6-well plates and exposed to 75 mM/L glucose, 1 mM/mL free fatty acids (oleic acid and palmitic acid ratio, 2:1), together with low, medium, and high concentrations of the drug components, as well as simvastatin, for 24 hours. After incubation, the culture medium was discarded, and the cells were rinsed twice with PBS. Fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 minutes was done, followed by removal of the fixative and two additional PBS washes. Oil Red O staining solution was then applied and incubated for 30 minutes. After removing staining solution, cells underwent washing three times using distilled water. Hematoxylin staining was subsequently carried out for 2 minutes, after which the cells were washed three times with distilled water. Differentiation was performed briefly using 1% hydrochloric acid ethanol, followed by removal of the solution and three washes with distilled water. Three randomly selected microscopic fields were captured, and lipid droplet areas were quantified using Image J software. For quantitative analysis, cells were stained with Oil Red O for 60 minutes, rinsed, and eluted with 1 mL isopropanol per well under gentle agitation. Absorbance at 490 nm was measured using a microplate reader.
4.8. Determination of Pharmacological Efficacy Indicators
HepG2 cells were seeded into 6-well plates and treated with 75 mM/L glucose, 1 mM/mL free fatty acids (oleic acid/palmitic acid, 2:1), and low, medium, or high concentrations of the drug component simvastatin for 24 hours. Levels of total cholesterol and triglycerides, oxidative stress markers (ROS, MDA, GSH, SOD), and inflammatory mediators (IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α) in each group were determined based on the manufacturers’ instructions.
4.9. RT-qPCR
Total RNA was isolated from HepG2 cells using the Trizol method, and RNA concentration was quantified with a NanoDrop. Reverse transcription utilized PrimeScript RT Master Mix (Perfect Real Time) to synthesize cDNA. RT-qPCR analysis was subsequently conducted with TB Green Premix Ex Taq II on the qTOWER2.0 real-time PCR system (Germany). GADPH served as the internal reference, and relative gene expressions were calculated using the 2-ΔΔCt method.
Table 1 shows primer sequences.
4.10. Western Blot
Total cellular protein was extracted from HepG2 cells using RIPA lysis buffer containing 1% protease inhibitor, and protein concentrations were determined using a BCA assay kit. Protein samples were separated by 4%–12% SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred onto PVDF membranes. Blocking was done with 5% non-fat milk for 1 hour and incubation was conducted with primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight. The primary antibodies included PI3K (1:1000), p-PI3K (1:1000), AKT (1:2000), p-AKT (1:2000), mTOR (1:1000), p-mTOR (1:1000), and β-actin (1:2000). Following triple TBST rinses, membranes were exposed to HRP-linked secondary antibodies (1:10,000) for 1 h and signals were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence. Data analysis used the t-test, with significance defined at P < 0.05.
4.11. Statistical Analysis
Experimental data were processed and visualized using IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0 and GraphPad Prism 8.3.0 software. For datasets following a normal distribution, one-way ANOVA was applied to evaluate differences among groups. Multiple comparisons were conducted using the LSD test under conditions of equal variance, whereas Dunnett’s T3 test was employed when variance homogeneity was not satisfied. Quantitative results are presented as (x̅ ± s). A significance threshold of P < 0.05 was adopted, and it was considered statistically significant.
Figure 1.
Network pharmacology analysis flow chart used in this study.
Figure 1.
Network pharmacology analysis flow chart used in this study.
Figure 2.
Identification of targets related to T2DM and NAFLD. (A-B) Venn diagram showing the number of targets related to T2DM (A) and NAFLD (B) obtained from different databases. (C) Venn diagram showing overlapping targets between T2DM and NAFLD. (D) GO analysis and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis were performed on overlapping targets. (F) Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network of overlapping genes. (F) Hub gene identification in Cytoscape using the Degree, EPC, MCC, and MNC algorithms (G) Overlay of the hub genes using an UpSet plot. OMIM: Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man; TTD: Therapeutic Target Database; EPC: EdgePercolation Component; MCC: Maximum Cluster Centrality; MNC: Maximum Neighborhood Component.
Figure 2.
Identification of targets related to T2DM and NAFLD. (A-B) Venn diagram showing the number of targets related to T2DM (A) and NAFLD (B) obtained from different databases. (C) Venn diagram showing overlapping targets between T2DM and NAFLD. (D) GO analysis and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis were performed on overlapping targets. (F) Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network of overlapping genes. (F) Hub gene identification in Cytoscape using the Degree, EPC, MCC, and MNC algorithms (G) Overlay of the hub genes using an UpSet plot. OMIM: Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man; TTD: Therapeutic Target Database; EPC: EdgePercolation Component; MCC: Maximum Cluster Centrality; MNC: Maximum Neighborhood Component.
Figure 3.
GO functional annotation, KEGG pathway enrichment analysis and hub gene identification of Astragalus’ targets for treating T2DM-NAFLD. (A) Intersection relationship between Astragalus’ target and T2DM-NAFLD target. (B) PPI network of the 152 overlapping genes constructed using the STRING database and Cytoscape software. (C) GO analysis. (D) KEGG pathway analysis. (E) Key modules identified in the PPI network using the molecular complex detection algorithm. (F) The top 10 highest connectivity genes in the PPI network as determined by Cytoscape. (G) UpSet plot showing the overlap of 6 hub genes derived from Degree, EPC, MCC, and MNC algorithms in the CytoHubba plugin.
Figure 3.
GO functional annotation, KEGG pathway enrichment analysis and hub gene identification of Astragalus’ targets for treating T2DM-NAFLD. (A) Intersection relationship between Astragalus’ target and T2DM-NAFLD target. (B) PPI network of the 152 overlapping genes constructed using the STRING database and Cytoscape software. (C) GO analysis. (D) KEGG pathway analysis. (E) Key modules identified in the PPI network using the molecular complex detection algorithm. (F) The top 10 highest connectivity genes in the PPI network as determined by Cytoscape. (G) UpSet plot showing the overlap of 6 hub genes derived from Degree, EPC, MCC, and MNC algorithms in the CytoHubba plugin.
Figure 4.
Molecular docking map of main components of Formononetin and core targets. (A) Heat map of binding energy between different components and target sites. (B) Molecular docking of the structure for Formononetin with IL-6, AKT1, JUN, TNF, CASP3, and ESR1.
Figure 4.
Molecular docking map of main components of Formononetin and core targets. (A) Heat map of binding energy between different components and target sites. (B) Molecular docking of the structure for Formononetin with IL-6, AKT1, JUN, TNF, CASP3, and ESR1.
Figure 5.
Results of molecular dynamics simulation (MDS) involving formononetin and target proteins. (A) The RMSD values values for each target protein-formononetin complex. (B) Variations in protein flexibility throughout the formononetin simulation. (C) Rg rate curve of the protein-formononetin complex. (D) SASA of the protein-formononetin complex during 100 ns simulation. (E) Dynamics of hydrogen bonding as observed in the molecular dynamics simulations. (F-G) Two-dimensional and three-dimensional mappings of the free energy landscape. (H-I) Residue energy decomposition for the binding of formononetin to protein. (J) Binding energy profiles of formononetin with target proteins during the MDS calculations. (Note: RMSD: root-mean-square deviation; RMSF: root-mean-square fluctuation; SASA: Solvent Accessible Surface Area; ΔMMGBSA: Δ molecular mechanics-generalized-Born surface area; Rg: radius of gyration.
Figure 5.
Results of molecular dynamics simulation (MDS) involving formononetin and target proteins. (A) The RMSD values values for each target protein-formononetin complex. (B) Variations in protein flexibility throughout the formononetin simulation. (C) Rg rate curve of the protein-formononetin complex. (D) SASA of the protein-formononetin complex during 100 ns simulation. (E) Dynamics of hydrogen bonding as observed in the molecular dynamics simulations. (F-G) Two-dimensional and three-dimensional mappings of the free energy landscape. (H-I) Residue energy decomposition for the binding of formononetin to protein. (J) Binding energy profiles of formononetin with target proteins during the MDS calculations. (Note: RMSD: root-mean-square deviation; RMSF: root-mean-square fluctuation; SASA: Solvent Accessible Surface Area; ΔMMGBSA: Δ molecular mechanics-generalized-Born surface area; Rg: radius of gyration.
Figure 6.
Effect of formononetin on lipid accumulation in vitro. (A) Activity of HepG2 cells cultured with concentration gradient of formononetin. (B) TG levels. (C) TC level. (D) Oil Red O staining. Note: ##P < 0.01, vs Control; **P < 0.01, vs Model.
Figure 6.
Effect of formononetin on lipid accumulation in vitro. (A) Activity of HepG2 cells cultured with concentration gradient of formononetin. (B) TG levels. (C) TC level. (D) Oil Red O staining. Note: ##P < 0.01, vs Control; **P < 0.01, vs Model.
Figure 7.
The improving effect of formononetin on the oxidative stress and inflammatory response of HepG2 cells under T2DM-NAFLD pathology. (A) Formononetin inhibits the oxidative stress of HepG2 cells under T2DM-NAFLD pathology (a) ROS levels. (b) MDA levels. (c) GSH levels. (d) SOD levels. (B) Formononetin improves T2 Inflammatory response of HepG2 cells under T2DM-NAFLD pathology (a) IL-6 levels. (b) IL-1β levels. (c) TNF-α levels. (C) Effect of formononetin on the mRNA expression of inflammatory factors in HepG2 cells under T2DM-NAFLD pathology (a) IL-6 levels. (b) IL-1β levels. (c) TNF-α levels. Note: ##P < 0.01, vs Control; **P < 0.01, vs Model.
Figure 7.
The improving effect of formononetin on the oxidative stress and inflammatory response of HepG2 cells under T2DM-NAFLD pathology. (A) Formononetin inhibits the oxidative stress of HepG2 cells under T2DM-NAFLD pathology (a) ROS levels. (b) MDA levels. (c) GSH levels. (d) SOD levels. (B) Formononetin improves T2 Inflammatory response of HepG2 cells under T2DM-NAFLD pathology (a) IL-6 levels. (b) IL-1β levels. (c) TNF-α levels. (C) Effect of formononetin on the mRNA expression of inflammatory factors in HepG2 cells under T2DM-NAFLD pathology (a) IL-6 levels. (b) IL-1β levels. (c) TNF-α levels. Note: ##P < 0.01, vs Control; **P < 0.01, vs Model.
Figure 8.
Assessment of the Effect of Formononetin on Alleviating T2DM-NAFLD via PI3K/AKT/mTOR Pathway mRNA and Protein Expression. (A) Western blot analysis of PI3K, AKT, and mTOR in each group. (B) mRNA analysis (a) PI3K levels. (b)AKT levels. (c) mTOR levels. (C) Quantitative analysis of Western blot for (a) PI3K levels. (b)AKT levels. (c) mTOR levels. Note: ##P< 0.01, vs Control; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, vs Model.
Figure 8.
Assessment of the Effect of Formononetin on Alleviating T2DM-NAFLD via PI3K/AKT/mTOR Pathway mRNA and Protein Expression. (A) Western blot analysis of PI3K, AKT, and mTOR in each group. (B) mRNA analysis (a) PI3K levels. (b)AKT levels. (c) mTOR levels. (C) Quantitative analysis of Western blot for (a) PI3K levels. (b)AKT levels. (c) mTOR levels. Note: ##P< 0.01, vs Control; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, vs Model.
Figure 9.
Mechanisms of Formononetin in Improving T2DM-NAFLD.
Figure 9.
Mechanisms of Formononetin in Improving T2DM-NAFLD.
Table 1.
Primers sequences used for RT-qPCR.
Table 1.
Primers sequences used for RT-qPCR.
| Genes |
Forward primer (5′-3′) |
Reverse primer (5′-3′) |
| IL-6 |
CTTCCAGCCAGTTGCCTTCTTG |
TGGTCTGTTGTGGGTGGTATCC |
| IL-1β |
ATGCCTCGTGCTGTCTGACC |
TTTGTCGTTGCTTGTCTCTCCTTG |
| TNF-α |
AACGCTTCTTGTCACTTC |
GGGCTACGGGCTTGTCACTC |
| PI3K |
CCACGACCATCATCAGGTGAA |
CCTCACGGAGGCATTCTAAAGT |
| AKT |
ATGGCACCTTCATTGGCTAC |
AACGGACTTCGGGCTCTTG |
| mTOR |
GCCGCGCGAATATTAAAGGA |
CTGGTTTCCTCATTCCGGCT |
| β-actin |
CTGGAGAAACCTGCCAAGTATG |
GGTGGAAGAATGGGAGTTGCT |