Quantum Information Copy Time (QICT): Global Predictions and Falsification Atlas

1. How to Read This Atlas

This manuscript is a prediction ledger. Each entry is constrained to include: (i) a named observable, (ii) a prediction as a number/band or as a sharp structural statement, (iii) a minimal hypothesis set, and (iv) a falsification route (what would rule it out under the stated hypotheses).

2. Summary Tables (Margin-Safe)

2.1. Quantitative Predictions (Explicit Numerical Bands)

Table 1. Quantitative predictions with explicit numerical bands.

ID	Observable	Prediction
DM-1	Higgs-portal singlet-scalar dark-matter mass $m_{\chi }$ (or $m_S$)	$m_{\chi }=58.4\pm 6.0\mathrm{GeV}\left(1\sigma \right)$.
DM-2	Spin-independent DM–nucleon cross section ${\sigma }_{\mathrm{SI}}$ for Higgs-portal singlet	${\sigma }_{\mathrm{SI}}\sim 5\times {10}^{-47}-2\times {10}^{-46}{\mathrm{cm}}^2$ for representative viable points near Higgs resonance; correlated with $m_S$ band.
DM-3	$\mathrm{BR}(h\to SS)$ for $m_S<m_h/2$	$\mathrm{BR}(h\to SS)\lesssim {10}^{-3}$ in the QICT–FRG band (for allowed scan points).
DE-2	$c_Q\left(z\right):=H\left(z\right)L_{\mathrm{copy}}\left(z\right)\sqrt{{\Omega }_Q\left(z\right)}$ satisfies $c_Q\left(z\right)\le 1$ (severe inequality)	Universal bound $c_Q\left(z\right)\le 1$ for any admissible ${\tau }_{\mathrm{copy}}$ consistent with locality (no superluminal copy-horizon propagation).
DE-3	Background expansion $H\left(z\right)$ given a constant effective diffusion D	If ${\tau }_{\mathrm{copy}}\left(L\right)\approx L^2/\left(4D\right)$ and $c_Q\to 1$, then $L_{\mathrm{copy}}=2\sqrt{D/H}$ and Friedmann closure yields a cubic equation for $H\left(z\right)$.
DE-4	Dark-energy equation-of-state $w_Q\left(a\right)$	$w_Q\left(a\right)=-1-{\displaystyle \frac{1}{3}}\mathrm{d}ln{\Omega }_Q/\mathrm{d}lna$ (and hence fixed once $L_{\mathrm{copy}}\left(a\right)$ is specified).
GR-1	Discrete gravitational action and field equations	$S_{\mathrm{Regge}}[\ell ]={\displaystyle \frac{1}{8\pi G}}{\sum }_h{A}_h(\ell ){\delta }_h(\ell )-{\displaystyle \frac{\Lambda }{8\pi G}}{\sum }_{\sigma }{V}_{\sigma }(\ell )$; varying w.r.t. ${\ell }_e$ gives discrete Einstein equations.
LAB-2	Scaling of ${\tau }_{\mathrm{copy}}$ with distance L	In diffusive closure, ${\tau }_{\mathrm{copy}}\left(L\right)\propto L^2/(\mathrm{const}\times D_{\mathrm{eff}})$ with $D_{\mathrm{eff}}$ extracted from a second-moment spectral susceptibility.
MASS-1	Threshold for matter-sector audit depth $D_{\mathrm{audit}}$	A minimum audit depth $D_{\mathrm{audit}}\ge 7$ in $3+1$D for stable matter excitations (as defined in the QICT audit framework).
ASTRO-1	Relative arrival-time lags between photon energies from compact-object flares / high-z transients	If the transient copy-horizon sector is nonzero, $\delta t(E,z)$ exhibits an energy dependence whose redshift integral is controlled by $H\left(z\right)$ and the copy-horizon epoch; applicable to EHT-band flare timing, AGN variability, and GRBs.
MASS-3	Collider exclusion lower bounds highlighting a characteristic heavy mass scale	Highlighted scales cluster into a small discrete set and shift with audit depth $D_{min}$ approximately as $m_{*}\propto {\left(D_{min}{\tau }_{min}\right)}^{-1/2}$ on the plateau $m_{*}{c}^2=\hslash \theta /\left(2D_{min}{\tau }_{min}\right)$.
CONST-1	Dimensionless combination ${\chi }_Y^{\left(2\right)}{T}_{*}^2$ used in the Golden Relation calibration layer	${\chi }_Y^{\left(2\right)}{T}_{*}^2=0.145\pm 0.010$ (benchmark prior).
CONST-2	${\kappa }_{\mathrm{eff}}$ entering the Golden Relation calibration layer	${\kappa }_{\mathrm{eff}}=0.136\pm 0.019$ (benchmark prior).
CONST-3	$C_{\Lambda }$ constant used in Golden Relation mapping to $m_S$	$C_{\Lambda }=1.6\pm 0.2{\mathrm{GeV}}^{-1}$ (benchmark prior).
ASTRO-2	Energy-dependent arrival-time residuals after source-intrinsic lag marginalization	If the transient sector is present, residual lags must follow a redshift-integral kernel fixed by the same $H\left(z\right)$ and $L_{\mathrm{copy}}\left(z\right)$ that fit background expansion; purely source-local models cannot mimic the predicted z-dependence across populations.

Table 1. Quantitative predictions with explicit numerical bands.

ID	Observable	Prediction
DM-1	Higgs-portal singlet-scalar dark-matter mass $m_{\chi }$ (or $m_S$)	$m_{\chi }=58.4\pm 6.0\mathrm{GeV}\left(1\sigma \right)$.
DM-2	Spin-independent DM–nucleon cross section ${\sigma }_{\mathrm{SI}}$ for Higgs-portal singlet	${\sigma }_{\mathrm{SI}}\sim 5\times {10}^{-47}-2\times {10}^{-46}{\mathrm{cm}}^2$ for representative viable points near Higgs resonance; correlated with $m_S$ band.
DM-3	$\mathrm{BR}(h\to SS)$ for $m_S<m_h/2$	$\mathrm{BR}(h\to SS)\lesssim {10}^{-3}$ in the QICT–FRG band (for allowed scan points).
DE-2	$c_Q\left(z\right):=H\left(z\right)L_{\mathrm{copy}}\left(z\right)\sqrt{{\Omega }_Q\left(z\right)}$ satisfies $c_Q\left(z\right)\le 1$ (severe inequality)	Universal bound $c_Q\left(z\right)\le 1$ for any admissible ${\tau }_{\mathrm{copy}}$ consistent with locality (no superluminal copy-horizon propagation).
DE-3	Background expansion $H\left(z\right)$ given a constant effective diffusion D	If ${\tau }_{\mathrm{copy}}\left(L\right)\approx L^2/\left(4D\right)$ and $c_Q\to 1$, then $L_{\mathrm{copy}}=2\sqrt{D/H}$ and Friedmann closure yields a cubic equation for $H\left(z\right)$.
DE-4	Dark-energy equation-of-state $w_Q\left(a\right)$	$w_Q\left(a\right)=-1-{\displaystyle \frac{1}{3}}\mathrm{d}ln{\Omega }_Q/\mathrm{d}lna$ (and hence fixed once $L_{\mathrm{copy}}\left(a\right)$ is specified).
GR-1	Discrete gravitational action and field equations	$S_{\mathrm{Regge}}[\ell ]={\displaystyle \frac{1}{8\pi G}}{\sum }_h{A}_h(\ell ){\delta }_h(\ell )-{\displaystyle \frac{\Lambda }{8\pi G}}{\sum }_{\sigma }{V}_{\sigma }(\ell )$; varying w.r.t. ${\ell }_e$ gives discrete Einstein equations.
LAB-2	Scaling of ${\tau }_{\mathrm{copy}}$ with distance L	In diffusive closure, ${\tau }_{\mathrm{copy}}\left(L\right)\propto L^2/(\mathrm{const}\times D_{\mathrm{eff}})$ with $D_{\mathrm{eff}}$ extracted from a second-moment spectral susceptibility.
MASS-1	Threshold for matter-sector audit depth $D_{\mathrm{audit}}$	A minimum audit depth $D_{\mathrm{audit}}\ge 7$ in $3+1$D for stable matter excitations (as defined in the QICT audit framework).
ASTRO-1	Relative arrival-time lags between photon energies from compact-object flares / high-z transients	If the transient copy-horizon sector is nonzero, $\delta t(E,z)$ exhibits an energy dependence whose redshift integral is controlled by $H\left(z\right)$ and the copy-horizon epoch; applicable to EHT-band flare timing, AGN variability, and GRBs.
MASS-3	Collider exclusion lower bounds highlighting a characteristic heavy mass scale	Highlighted scales cluster into a small discrete set and shift with audit depth $D_{min}$ approximately as $m_{*}\propto {\left(D_{min}{\tau }_{min}\right)}^{-1/2}$ on the plateau $m_{*}{c}^2=\hslash \theta /\left(2D_{min}{\tau }_{min}\right)$.
CONST-1	Dimensionless combination ${\chi }_Y^{\left(2\right)}{T}_{*}^2$ used in the Golden Relation calibration layer	${\chi }_Y^{\left(2\right)}{T}_{*}^2=0.145\pm 0.010$ (benchmark prior).
CONST-2	${\kappa }_{\mathrm{eff}}$ entering the Golden Relation calibration layer	${\kappa }_{\mathrm{eff}}=0.136\pm 0.019$ (benchmark prior).
CONST-3	$C_{\Lambda }$ constant used in Golden Relation mapping to $m_S$	$C_{\Lambda }=1.6\pm 0.2{\mathrm{GeV}}^{-1}$ (benchmark prior).
ASTRO-2	Energy-dependent arrival-time residuals after source-intrinsic lag marginalization	If the transient sector is present, residual lags must follow a redshift-integral kernel fixed by the same $H\left(z\right)$ and $L_{\mathrm{copy}}\left(z\right)$ that fit background expansion; purely source-local models cannot mimic the predicted z-dependence across populations.

2.2. Structural Predictions (Model-Class Constraints and Inequalities)

Table 2. Structural predictions (selected).

ID	Observable	Prediction
DE-1	$L_{\mathrm{copy}}\left(t\right)$ defined by ${\tau }_{\mathrm{copy}}(L_{\mathrm{copy}},t)=H^{-1}\left(t\right)$	Existence and uniqueness of $L_{\mathrm{copy}}$ under mild monotonicity; sets an IR scale without an event-horizon postulate.
GR-2	Quantum-gravity path integral over information configurations	$Z={\sum }_C\int {\prod }_e\mathrm{d}{I}_e{\prod }_e\mathrm{d}{n}_{e}exp\left(-S_I[I,n]\right)$ defines a nonperturbative quantum theory; classical GR appears only as a macroscopic phase.
GR-3	Universality-class statement for long-distance correlators	If RG flow has an attractive IR fixed point in the $(\tilde{G},\tilde{\Lambda })$ plane, diffeomorphism-invariant correlators converge to continuum GR in the scaling limit.
LAB-1	${\tau }_{\mathrm{copy}}(A\to B;\eta )$ in many-body dynamics	Earliest t such that the trace distance between reduced states on B exceeds $\eta$; equivalently, the optimal Helstrom advantage is $\ge \eta$.
DCA-1	Permutation-unitary lift of reversible local update rules	In the limit of minimal update time, reversible deterministic rules correspond to permutation unitaries acting on Hilbert-space lifts.
DE-6	Consistency between expansion, growth/lensing, and transient timing observables under one inferred copy horizon $L_{\mathrm{copy}}\left(z\right)$	A single inferred $L_{\mathrm{copy}}\left(z\right)$ (equivalently $c_Q\left(z\right)$) must fit (i) $H\left(z\right)$ expansion data, (ii) growth/lensing reconstructions, and (iii) a transient timing observable; failure of joint consistency falsifies the copy-horizon mapping.
GR-4	Recovery of Regge-type equations and continuum GR correlators from a discrete information-field partition function	A single microscopic model yields (i) discrete field equations by exact variation and (ii) continuum Einstein dynamics as an IR scaling phase without semiclassical input; deviations must be computable and suppressed by the coarse-graining scale.

Table 2. Structural predictions (selected).

ID	Observable	Prediction
DE-1	$L_{\mathrm{copy}}\left(t\right)$ defined by ${\tau }_{\mathrm{copy}}(L_{\mathrm{copy}},t)=H^{-1}\left(t\right)$	Existence and uniqueness of $L_{\mathrm{copy}}$ under mild monotonicity; sets an IR scale without an event-horizon postulate.
GR-2	Quantum-gravity path integral over information configurations	$Z={\sum }_C\int {\prod }_e\mathrm{d}{I}_e{\prod }_e\mathrm{d}{n}_{e}exp\left(-S_I[I,n]\right)$ defines a nonperturbative quantum theory; classical GR appears only as a macroscopic phase.
GR-3	Universality-class statement for long-distance correlators	If RG flow has an attractive IR fixed point in the $(\tilde{G},\tilde{\Lambda })$ plane, diffeomorphism-invariant correlators converge to continuum GR in the scaling limit.
LAB-1	${\tau }_{\mathrm{copy}}(A\to B;\eta )$ in many-body dynamics	Earliest t such that the trace distance between reduced states on B exceeds $\eta$; equivalently, the optimal Helstrom advantage is $\ge \eta$.
DCA-1	Permutation-unitary lift of reversible local update rules	In the limit of minimal update time, reversible deterministic rules correspond to permutation unitaries acting on Hilbert-space lifts.
DE-6	Consistency between expansion, growth/lensing, and transient timing observables under one inferred copy horizon $L_{\mathrm{copy}}\left(z\right)$	A single inferred $L_{\mathrm{copy}}\left(z\right)$ (equivalently $c_Q\left(z\right)$) must fit (i) $H\left(z\right)$ expansion data, (ii) growth/lensing reconstructions, and (iii) a transient timing observable; failure of joint consistency falsifies the copy-horizon mapping.
GR-4	Recovery of Regge-type equations and continuum GR correlators from a discrete information-field partition function	A single microscopic model yields (i) discrete field equations by exact variation and (ii) continuum Einstein dynamics as an IR scaling phase without semiclassical input; deviations must be computable and suppressed by the coarse-graining scale.

2.3. Semi-Quantitative Predictions (Scaling/Sign Constraints)

Table 3. Semi-quantitative predictions (selected).

ID

Observable

Prediction

Table 3. Semi-quantitative predictions (selected).

ID

Observable

Prediction

3. Figures (Embedded in the PDF)

All figures are included directly in this PDF. They can be regenerated locally by running:

python3 run_everything.py

Figure 1. Visualization of the benchmark mass prediction $m_{\chi }=58.4\pm 6.0\mathrm{GeV}$ (Gaussian proxy).

Figure 1. Visualization of the benchmark mass prediction $m_{\chi }=58.4\pm 6.0\mathrm{GeV}$ (Gaussian proxy).