Submitted:
25 December 2025
Posted:
26 December 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Procurement Management in International Engineering EPC Initiatives
2.2. Theory of Supply Chain Integration
2.3. The Benefits of Supply Chain Integration
2.4. The Imperative of Supply Chain Integration in Procurement Management for International EPC Projects
2.5. Theory of Stakeholder Management
3. Methods
3.1. Analysis of Inter-Organizational Stakeholder Relationships Utilizing Social Network Analysis
3.2. Case Studies
3.2.1. The EPC Project for the Thái Bình Phase II Boiler Island in Vietnam
3.2.2. A Fijian Renewable Energy Project
3.2.3. Zambian Energy Transmission and Transformation Project
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| BRI | Belt and Road Initiative |
| EPC | Engineering, Procurement, and Construction |
| SNA | Social Network Analysis |
| ENR | Engineering News Record |
| JIT | Just In Time |
References
- Huang, J.; Li, S.M. Adaptive strategies and sustainable innovations of Chinese contractors in the Belt and Road Initiative: A social network and supply chain integration perspective. Sustainability 2024, 16, 8927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, J.; Fu, X.; Chen, X.; Wen, X. Supply Chain Management for the Engineering Procurement and Construction (EPC) Model: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability 2024, 16(22), 9748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, J.; Li, S.M. Data-Driven Analysis of Supply Chain Integration’s Impact on Procurement Performance in International EPC Projects. Sustainability 2024, 16, 10729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schoenherr, T; Swink, M. Revisiting the arcs of integration: Cross-validations and extensions. Journal of Operations Management 2012, 30(1), 99–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahin, F; Robinson, E P. Flow coordination and information sharing in supply chains: review, implications, and directions for future research. Decision sciences 2002, 33(4), 505–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lau, H S; Lau, A H L. The newsstand problem: A capacitated multiple-product single-period inventory problem. European Journal of Operational Research 1996, 94(1), 29–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, Y; Shang, Y. Investigation of industry 4.0 technologies mediating effect on the supply chain performance and supply chain management practices. In Environmental Science & Pollution Research; 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shin, H; Collier, D A; Wilson, D D. Partnership-based supply chain collaboration: Impact on commitment, innovation, and firm performance. Journal of Business Logistics 2019, 40(2), 137–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goldratt, EM. Theory of Constraints; North River Press: NewYork, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Dyer, J H; Sing, H. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of management review 1998, 23(4), 660–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaufmann, L; Carter, C R. International supply relationships and non-financial performance-a comparison of US and German practices. Journal of Operations Management 2006, 24(5), 653–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tait, D. Make strong relationships a priority. Canadian Manager 1998, 23(1), 21–28. [Google Scholar]
- Blanchard, D. Supply chain management best practices; John Wiley & Sons: New Jersey, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Mattessich, PW; Johnson, KM. Collaboration: What makes it work; Fieldstone Alliance: St. Paul, MN, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Autry, CW; Moon, MA. Achieving supply chain integration: Connecting the supply chain inside and out for competitive advantage; FT Press: Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Brinkhoff, A; Özer, Ö; Sargut, G. All you need is trust? An examination of inter-organizational supply chain projects. Production and Operations Management 2015, 24(2), 181–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tong, W; Jiang, H; Hong, W. Mode selection of the implementation and construction of projects on the comprehensive utilization of mineral resources: A feasibility study for higher education. Higher Education and Oriental Studies 2021, 1(4). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stock, G N; Greis, N P; Kasarda, J D. Logistics, strategy and structure: a conceptual framework. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 1998, 18(1), 37–52. [Google Scholar]
- Frohlich, M T; Westbrook, R. Arcs of integration: an international study of supply chain strategies. Journal of operations man-agement 2001, 19(2), 185–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leuschner, R; Rogers, D S; Charvet, F F. A Meta-Analysis of Supply Chain Integration and Firm Performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management 2013, 29(2), 32–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mackelprang, A W; Robinson, J L; Bernardes, E. The Relationship Between Strategic Supply Chain Integration and Performance: A Meta-Analytic Evaluation and Implications for Supply Chain Management Research. Journal of Business Logistics 2014, 35(1), 71–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Titus, S; Brochner, J. Managing information flow in construction supply chains. Construction Innovation Information Process Management 2005, 5(2), 71–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gustin, C M; Stank, T P; Daugherty, P J. Computerization: supporting integration. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 1994, 24(1), 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ellram, L M; Cooper, M C. The relationship between supply chain management and Keiretsu. The International Journal of Logistics Management 1993, 4(1), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Byrne, SM; Javad, S. Integrated logistics information systems (ILIS): Competitive advantage or increased cost? Annual Conference, Council of Logistics Management, 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Scott, B. Partnering in Europe: Incentive based alliancing for projects; Thomas Telford: London, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Wood, A. Extending the supply chain: strengthening links with IT. Chemical Week 1997, 159(25), 25–26. [Google Scholar]
- Olhager, J; Selldin, E. Enterprise resource planning survey of Swedish manufacturing firms. European Journal of Operational Re-search 2003, 146(2), 365–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagchi, P K; Chun Ha, B; Skjoett-Larsen, T; et al. Supply chain integration: a European survey. The International Journal of Logistics Management 2005, 16(2), 275–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jap, S D. Perspectives on joint competitive advantages in buyer-supplier relationships. International Journal of Research in Mar-keting 2001, 18(1), 19–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vangen, S; Huxham, C. Enacting Leadership for Collaborative Advantage: Dilemmas of Ideology and Pragmatism in the Activities of Partnership Managers. British Journal of Management 2003, 14(s1), S61–S76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ralston, PM; Blackhurst, J; Cantor, DE; Crum, MR. A structure–conduct–performance perspective of how strategic supply chain integration affects firm performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management 2015, 51(2), 47–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Min, S; Roath, A S; Daugherty, P J; et al. Supply chain collaboration: what’s happening? The international journal of logistics management 2005, 16(2), 237–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, M; Zhang, Q. Supply chain collaboration: Impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management 2011, 29(3), 163–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quinn Francis, J. Reengineering the supply chain: An interview with Michael Hammer. Supply Chain Management Review 1999, (1), 20–26. [Google Scholar]
- Whyte, J; Stasis, A; Lindkvist, C. Managing change in the delivery of complex projects: Configuration management, asset information and ‘big data’. International Journal of Project Management 2016, 34(2), 339–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Briscoe, G; Dainty, A. Construction supply chain integration: an elusive goal? Supply chain Management 2005, 10(4), 319–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tookey, J E; Murray, M; Hardcastle, C; et al. Construction procurement routes: re-defining the contours of construction procurement. Engineering Construction & Architectural Management in Engineering 1998, 14(5), 73–78. [Google Scholar]
- De la Garza, JM; Alcantara, Jr P; Kapoor, M; et al. Value of concurrent engineering for A/E/C industry. Journal of Management in Engineering 1994, 10(3), 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demirkesen, S; Ozorhon, B. Measuring project management performance: Case of construction industry. Engineering Management Journal 2017, 29(4), 258–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barlow, J. Innovation and learning in complex offshore construction projects. Research Policy 2000, 29(7), 973–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- VrijhoefR, KoskelaL. Roles of supply chain management in construction. 7th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC-7), Berkeley, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hugos, MH. Essentials of supply chain management; John Wiley & Sons: New Jersey, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Love, P E D; Davis, P R; Chevis, R; et al. Risk/reward compensation model for civil engineering infrastructure alliance projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 2011, 137(2), 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shokri, S; Ahn, S; Lee, S; et al. Current Status of Interface Management in Construction: Drivers and Effects of Systematic Interface Management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 2015, 04015070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, L; Tang, W; Liu, C; Wang, S; Wang, T; Shen, W; et al. Enhancing engineer–procure–construct project performance by partnering in international markets: Perspective from Chinese construction companies. International Journal of Project Management 2016, 34(1), 30–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amirtash, P; Parchami Jalal, M; Jelodar, MB. Integration of project management services for International Engineering, Procurement and Construction projects. Built Environment Project and Asset Management 2021, 11(2), 330–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaccard, J; BeckerM, A. Statistics for the behavioral sciences; International Thomson Publishing Incorporated: Melbourne, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, S; Tang, W; Li, Y. Relationship between owners’ capabilities and project performance on development of hydropower projects in China. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 2013, 139(9), 1168–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yeo, K T; Ning, J H. Managing uncertainty in major equipment procurement in engineering projects. European Journal of Operational Research 2006, 171(1), 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kraljic, P. Purchasing Must Become Supply Management. Harvard Business Review 1983, 61(5), 109–117. [Google Scholar]
- Shapiro, R D. Get leverage from logistics. Harvard Business Review 1984, 62(3), 118–126. [Google Scholar]
- Chopra, S; Meindl, P. Supply chain management: strategy, planning, and operation, 3rd edition; Pearson, Prentice Hall, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Cooper, MC; Lambert, DM; Pagh, JD. Supply chain management: more than a new name for logistics. The International Journal of Logistics Management 1997, 8(1), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mentzer, J; DeWitt, W; Keebler, J; Soonhoong, M; Nix, N; Smith, C; Zacharia, Z. Defining supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics 2001, 22(1), 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan, A P C; Scott, D; Lam, E W M. Framework of success criteria for design/build projects. Journal of Management in Engineering 2002, 18(3), 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan, A P C. Evaluation of enhanced design and build system-a case study of a hospital project. Construction Management & Economics 2000, 18(7), 863–871. [Google Scholar]
- Come Zebra, E. I.; van der Windt, H. J.; Nhambiu, J. O. P.; Golinucci, N.; Gandiglio, M.; Bianco, I.; Faaij, A. P. C. The integration of economic, environmental, and social aspects by developing and demonstrating an analytical framework that combines methods and indicators using Mavumira Village as a case study. Sustainability 16(22). [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y.; Lee, D. A study on the rational decision-making process of vessel organization—Focusing on cases of vessel accidents. Sustainability 2024, 16(22), 9820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petridi, A.; Fragkouli, D.-N.; Mejias, L.; Paredes, L.; Bistue, M.; Boukouvalas, C.; Kekes, T.; Krokida, M.; Papadaki, S. Assessing the overall sustainability performance of the meat processing industry before and after wastewater valorization interventions: A comparative analysis. Sustainability 16(22), 9811, 2024. [CrossRef]
- Safaei, M.; Al Dawsari, S.; Yahya, K. Optimizing multi-channel green supply chain dynamics with renewable energy integration and emissions reduction. Sustainability 2024, 16(22), 9710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hao, F.F. Research on E-Procurement System Based on Supply Chain Management. Manag. Technol. SME 2019, 10, 31–32. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, B.; Wu, D.; Liang, L.; Olson, D.L. Supply chain loss averse newsboy model with capital constraint. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 2015, 46, 646–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manik, D. Impact of supply chain integration on business performance: A review. J. Sist. Tek. Ind. 2022, 24, 85–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harju, A.; Hallikas, J.; Immonen, M.; Lintukangas, K. The impact of procurement digitalization on supply chain resilience: Empirical evidence from Finland. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2023, 28, 62–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’brien, W.J. Construction Supply-Chain Management: A Vision for Advanced Coordination, Costing, and Control; NSF Berkeley-Stanford Construction Research Workshop: Stanford, CA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, X.; Van Donk, D.P.; Van der Vaart, T. The different impact of inter-organizational and intra-organizational ICT on supply chain performance. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2016, 36, 803–824. [Google Scholar]
- Songer, A.D.; Molenaar, K.R. Project characteristics for successful public-sector design-build. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 1997, 123, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perkins, R.A. Sources of changes in design-build contracts for a governmental owner. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2009, 135, 588–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bosen, He. International Engineering Contracting (2nd Edition); China Construction Industry Press, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Y. The impact of socio-cultural differences on the performance of overseas EPC project supply chain management. J. Chin. J. 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Lv, Y.; Shang, Y. Investigation of industry 4.0 technologies mediating effect on the supply chain performance and supply chain management practices. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 106129–106144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ota, M.; Srinivasan, S.; Nandakumar, C.D. Optimal order quantity by maximizing expected utility for the newsboy model. Int. J. Procure. Manag. 2019, 12, 410–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaiser, H.F. Little Jiffy, Mark IV. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 1974, 34, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sobotka, A.; Czarnigowska, A. Analysis of supply system models for planning construction project logistics. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 2005, 11, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spicer, J. Making Sense of Multivariate Data Analysis: An Intuitive Approach; Sage: London, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, J.Y. Discussion on the measures for reducing “two financials” in EPC general contracting projects. Hydropower Stn. Des. 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Young, T.L. Successful Project Management; Kogan Page Publishers: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Wondirad, A.; Tolkach, D.; King, B. Stakeholder collaboration as a major factor for sustainable ecotourism development in developing countries. Tour. Manag. 2020, 78, 104024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nikjow, M.A.; Liang, L.; Sepasgozar, S. Engineering procurement construction in the context of Belt and Road infrastructure projects in West Asia: A SWOT analysis. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 2021, 27, 04521001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crespin-Mazet, F.; Ghauri, P. Co-development as a marketing strategy in the construction industry. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2007, 36, 158–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jergeas, GF; Ruwanpura, J. Why cost and schedule overruns on mega oil sands projects. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction 2009, 15(1), 40–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olander, S; Landin, A. Evaluation of stakeholder influence in the implementation of construction projects. International Journal of Project Management 2005, 23(4), 320–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J; Shen, G Q; Ho, M; et al. Stakeholder management in construction: An empirical study to address research gaps in previous studies. International Journal of Project Management 2011, 29(7), 900–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kerzner, H. Project management best practices: Achieving global excellence; John Wiley & Sons: New Jersey, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Walker, D H T; Bourne, L M; Rowlinson, S. Stakeholders and the supply chain. In Procurement Systems: A Cross-industry Project Management Perspective; Walker, D H T, Rowlinson, S, Eds.; Taylor & Francis: Abingdon, UK, 2008; pp. 70–100. [Google Scholar]
- Chinowsky, PS; Diekmann, J; O’Brien, J. Project organizations as social networks. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 2009, 136(4), 452–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reed, M S; Graves, A; Dandy, N; et al. Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management 2009, 90(5), 1933–1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huang, J.; Fu, X. Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Digital Management (ICAIDM 2024). In Advances in Intelligent Systems Research; ISBN 978-94-6463-578-2. ISSN 1951-6851. [CrossRef]
- Huang, J. Strategic Evolution and Adaptive Responses of Chinese International General Contractors under the Belt and Road Initiative: Insights from Social Network Analysis. In Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Digital Economy and Computer Science (DECS 2024), Xiamen, China. ACM, New York, NY, USA, September 20–22, 2024; p. 6 pages. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, J.; Fu, X. Advanced Procurement Management Strategies for International Energy and Power Engineering Projects: A Supply Chain Integration Perspective. 2024 4th International Conference on Energy, Power and Electrical Engineering (EPEE), Wuhan, China, 2024; pp. 1075–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, J.; Fu, X. Advanced Procurement Management Strategies for International Energy and Power Engineering Projects: A Supply Chain Integration Perspective. In Proceedings of the 2024 6th Management Science Informatization and Economic Innovation Development Conference (MSIEID 2024), Guangzhou, China, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]







| Stakeholder | Intermediate centrality | Ranking |
|---|---|---|
| Inter-organizational connection with the construction party | 623.777 | 1 |
| Inter-organizational connection with installation service supplier | 616.684 | 2 |
| Inter-organizational connection with logistic service provider | 579.404 | 3 |
| Inter-organizational connection with the owner | 565.026 | 4 |
| Inter-organizational connection with domestic equipment and material suppliers | 553.198 | 5 |
| Inter-organizational connection with consulting engineer | 551.606 | 6 |
| Inter-organizational connection with group headquarters | 512.523 | 7 |
| Inter-organizational connection with domestic customs | 502.360 | 8 |
| Inter-organizational connection with foreign main material suppliers | 487.756 | 9 |
| Inter-organizational connection with domestic main material suppliers | 449.98 | 10 |
| Inter-organizational connection with the designer | 421.677 | 11 |
| Inter-organizational connection with foreign equipment and material suppliers | 411.496 | 12 |
| Inter-organizational connection with Chinese contractors in the same overseas market | 396.808 | 13 |
| Inter-organizational connection with foreign customs authorities | 393.705 | 14 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
