This note clarifies an apparent tension between a low “structural” mass scale predicted by the QICT Golden Relation and the much higher mass scales foregrounded in collider publications. In the QICT framework, the Golden Relation fixes a reference band for the singlet-scalar mass around m_0 = 58.1 \pm 1.5 GeV, interpreted as a baseline (matching-regime) branch. By contrast, values such as 335 GeV, 470 GeV, 790 GeV, and 910 GeV (ATLAS) and 840–880 GeV (CMS) arise in type-III seesaw heavy-lepton searches as 95% confidence-level exclusion lower limits, not as reconstructed resonance peaks. The note argues that, operationally, QICT associates the experimentally “highlighted” scale with a regime-dependent effective mass m_{\mathrm{eff}} governed by audit depth and copy/certification latency. Introducing a synchronization gain \kappa \ge 1 via \tau_{\mathrm{copy}}=\tau_0/\kappa, one obtains m_{\mathrm{eff}}=\kappa m_0, so high quoted scales can be read as latency-compressed regimes (\kappa \gg 1). A speed-limit bound \tau_{\mathrm{copy}}\ge\tau_{\min} then implies an upper plateau, providing a natural mechanism for “plateau selection” across analyses. The specific emergence of 470 GeV in ATLAS Run-1 is attributed to channel expansion (notably inclusion of the three-lepton channel), consistent with the thesis that the foregrounded number is sensitivity- and procedure-dependent rather than an intrinsic single mass.