1. Introduction
Magnetic nanomaterials have attracted significant research interest over the past three decades due to their unique size-dependent properties and diverse technological applications [
1,
2]. Among magnetic materials, ferrites occupy a prominent position owing to their exceptional combination of magnetic properties, chemical stability, and cost-effectiveness [
3]. Ferrite nanoparticles find applications in high-density magnetic recording media, microwave absorption devices, biomedical imaging and drug delivery, catalysis, environmental remediation, and electromagnetic interference shielding [
4,
5].
The synthesis of ferrite nanoparticles with controlled composition, phase purity, particle size, and morphology remains a critical challenge that determines their functional performance. Common synthesis methods include conventional solid-state reaction, co-precipitation, hydrothermal synthesis, microemulsion, and mechanical alloying [
6]. While each method offers specific advantages, the sol-gel auto-combustion technique has gained widespread popularity as a simple, rapid, energy-efficient, and cost-effective approach for producing nanocrystalline ferrite powders [
1].
The sol-gel auto-combustion method, also termed solution combustion synthesis (SCS) or gel combustion synthesis, combines the advantages of sol-gel processing (molecular-level homogeneity) with combustion synthesis (rapid exothermic reaction) [
7]. The process involves dissolving metal nitrate precursors along with organic fuel(s) in an aqueous medium, followed by gel formation upon heating and subsequent self-propagating combustion to yield nanocrystalline oxide powders. The exothermic reaction between the oxidizing metal nitrates and reducing organic fuel generates high temperatures locally, facilitating rapid crystallization while the large volume of evolved gases prevents particle agglomeration [
8].
Since its introduction by Kingsley and Patil in 1988 for the synthesis of alumina powders [
9], the solution combustion method has been applied to synthesize oxide materials including ferrites, perovskites, garnets, and mixed metal oxides [
10]. The method offers the following key advantages: (i) low processing temperature compared to conventional ceramic routes; (ii) molecular-level mixing ensuring compositional homogeneity; (iii) rapid synthesis time (minutes vs. hours); (iv) simple equipment requirements; (v) ability to produce metastable phases; and (vi) easy scalability [
11].
This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the sol-gel auto-combustion synthesis of magnetic nanomaterials, with emphasis on ferrite systems. The fundamental principles and reaction mechanisms are first discussed, followed by detailed analysis of the critical process parameters that control product characteristics. The synthesis of various ferrite systems including spinels and hexaferrites is reviewed. Finally, applications and future perspectives are outlined.
2. Fundamental Principles and Reaction Mechanism
2.1. Basic Concepts of Combustion Synthesis
Combustion synthesis relies on highly exothermic self-sustaining reactions between reactants to produce the desired product [
12]. In the context of sol-gel auto-combustion, the reaction occurs between metal nitrates (acting as oxidizers) and organic compounds (acting as fuels) in an aqueous solution. The combustion reaction can be thermodynamically described using concepts from propellant chemistry, where the stoichiometric fuel-to-oxidizer ratio determines the maximum energy release [
13].
The combustion reaction can be represented generically as:
For example, the synthesis of nickel ferrite using citric acid as fuel proceeds as:
2.2. Role of Organic Fuels
Organic fuels serve dual functions in the sol-gel auto-combustion process: (i) as chelating agents that complex with metal ions to ensure homogeneous mixing, and (ii) as fuels that provide the reducing power for the combustion reaction [
1]. The most commonly employed fuels include:
Table 1.
Common fuels used in sol-gel auto-combustion synthesis.
Table 1.
Common fuels used in sol-gel auto-combustion synthesis.
| Fuel |
Formula |
Reducing Valence |
Characteristics |
| Citric acid |
|
+18 |
Strong chelating, moderate flame |
| Glycine |
|
+9 |
High flame temperature |
| Urea |
O |
+6 |
Vigorous combustion |
| Ethylene glycol |
|
+10 |
Good complexing ability |
| Tartaric acid |
|
+10 |
Moderate chelating |
Citric acid is the most widely used fuel due to its excellent chelating ability with most metal ions and its moderate combustion characteristics that allow better control over particle properties [
14,
15].
2.3. Fuel-to-Oxidizer Ratio
The fuel-to-oxidizer ratio (
) is a critical parameter that determines the thermodynamics of the combustion reaction. Based on propellant chemistry concepts,
is defined as:
For
, the reaction is stoichiometric, theoretically producing maximum flame temperature and complete combustion. When
, the mixture is fuel-lean (oxidizer excess), while
indicates a fuel-rich condition [
13]. Studies have shown that the optimal
for synthesizing pure-phase ferrites often deviates from unity due to practical considerations such as heat losses and incomplete combustion [
1,
16].
2.4. Combustion Modes
The auto-combustion process can proceed through different modes depending on the reaction conditions:
Volume Combustion Synthesis (VCS): The entire gel mass ignites uniformly, resulting in rapid heat release throughout the sample.
Self-Propagating High-Temperature Synthesis (SHS): Combustion initiates at one point and propagates as a wave through the sample.
Smoldering Combustion: Slow, flameless reaction that proceeds without visible flame.
The combustion mode affects the heat generation rate and product characteristics. Generally, smoldering combustion produces finer particles due to lower peak temperatures [
10].
3. Critical Process Parameters
3.1. pH of the Precursor Solution
The pH of the precursor solution significantly influences the chelation efficiency and gel formation behavior. For citric acid-based synthesis, the pH is typically adjusted to 7 using ammonia solution to ensure complete complexation of metal ions [
16]. At low pH, carboxylic groups of citric acid are protonated, reducing their chelating ability. At high pH (>10), hydroxide precipitation may occur preferentially. Studies have demonstrated that pH values between 6-8 generally yield optimal results for ferrite synthesis [
8].
3.2. Fuel Type and Concentration
Different fuels produce distinct combustion characteristics:
Citric acid: Produces moderate flame temperatures (typically 200-400°C), yielding nanocrystalline products with good phase purity. The citrate anion effectively chelates trivalent metal ions through its carboxyl and hydroxyl groups [
15].
Glycine: Generates higher flame temperatures (>600°C), resulting in larger crystallite sizes but excellent crystallinity. Glycine’s zwitterionic nature allows it to effectively complex both acidic and basic metal ions [
9].
Urea: Produces very high flame temperatures with vigorous gas evolution. The combustion tends to be more violent, which can compromise particle size control [
11].
The fuel concentration relative to metal nitrates influences the combustion characteristics. Excess fuel leads to incomplete oxidation and carbon contamination, while fuel deficiency results in unreacted nitrates and poor crystallinity [
1].
3.3. Calcination Temperature and Time
While the as-burnt product often exhibits the desired phase, post-combustion calcination is frequently employed to:
Improve crystallinity by allowing atomic rearrangement
Remove residual carbon and organic residues
Eliminate secondary phases
Control final particle size
Calcination temperatures typically range from 500-1000°C for ferrites, with higher temperatures promoting grain growth through Ostwald ripening [
1]. The crystallite size generally follows an Arrhenius-type relationship with temperature:
where
D is crystallite size,
is activation energy,
R is the gas constant, and
T is temperature.
3.4. Heating Rate
The heating rate during gel combustion affects the nature of combustion:
Slow heating: Gradual decomposition, lower peak temperature, smaller particles
Rapid heating: Violent combustion, higher temperature, larger particles
Controlled heating rates (typically 5-10°C/min) are often preferred for reproducible synthesis [
8].
4. Synthesis of Magnetic Nanomaterials
4.1. Spinel Ferrites ()
Spinel ferrites with the general formula
(where M = Co, Ni, Zn, Mn, Cu, Mg) represent the most extensively studied magnetic materials synthesized via sol-gel auto-combustion [
1].
4.1.1. Cobalt Ferrite ()
Cobalt ferrite exhibits high magnetocrystalline anisotropy (
= 2.65 ×
erg/
) and moderate saturation magnetization, making it attractive for magnetic recording applications [
2]. Synthesis typically involves:
Dissolving Co(·6O and Fe(·9O in water
Adding citric acid in 1:1 molar ratio to total metal ions
Adjusting pH to 7 with OH
Heating at 80°C to form gel
Auto-combustion to produce powder
Calcination at 500-800°C
Typical results show crystallite sizes of 20-60 nm and saturation magnetization of 60-80 emu/g depending on synthesis parameters [
17].
4.1.2. Nickel Ferrite ()
Nickel ferrite is a typical inverse spinel with soft magnetic properties, widely used in high-frequency applications [
3]. The sol-gel auto-combustion synthesis follows similar procedures as cobalt ferrite. Key findings include:
Crystallite size: 15-45 nm (as-burnt), 30-80 nm (calcined at 700°C)
Saturation magnetization: 35-50 emu/g
Coercivity: 50-200 Oe (soft magnetic behavior)
4.1.3. Zinc Ferrite ()
Zinc ferrite is a normal spinel with paramagnetic behavior in bulk but exhibits ferrimagnetic properties at the nanoscale due to cation redistribution [
6]. This size-dependent magnetic transition makes it particularly interesting for nanoscale applications.
4.1.4. Mixed Spinel Ferrites
The sol-gel auto-combustion method readily allows synthesis of mixed ferrites such as
,
, and
by adjusting the precursor stoichiometry [
18]. These mixed systems allow tuning of magnetic properties between end-member compositions.
4.2. Hexagonal Ferrites
4.2.1. M-Type Hexaferrites (, )
M-type hexaferrites are hard magnetic materials with the magnetoplumbite structure, widely used as permanent magnets [
5]. The sol-gel auto-combustion synthesis of these materials requires careful control of stoichiometry due to the large Fe:Ba(Sr) ratio of 12:1.
Synthesis considerations include:
Higher calcination temperatures (850-1100°C) required
Fe/Ba(Sr) ratio slightly above stoichiometry (12.2:1) to compensate for Fe losses
Phase purity sensitive to pH and fuel ratio
Typical magnetic properties achieved: Ms = 50-70 emu/g, Hc = 3000-6000 Oe [
14].
4.2.2. Rare Earth Doped Hexaferrites
The incorporation of rare earth elements (La, Nd, Sm, Gd, Ho, Dy) into hexaferrites has been extensively studied to modify their magnetic and optical properties [
19]. Sol-gel auto-combustion is particularly suitable for synthesizing doped hexaferrites due to its molecular-level mixing capability that ensures uniform dopant distribution.
5. Characterization Techniques
5.1. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)
XRD is the primary technique for:
Phase identification by matching diffraction patterns with ICDD database
Lattice parameter determination using Bragg’s law
Crystallite size estimation using Scherrer equation:
where
D is crystallite size,
K is shape factor (0.9),
is X-ray wavelength,
is FWHM, and
is Bragg angle [
21].
5.2. Electron Microscopy
SEM: Surface morphology, particle shape, agglomeration
TEM: Particle size distribution, crystallinity, selected area diffraction
HRTEM: Lattice fringes, defects, core-shell structures
5.3. Vibrating Sample Magnetometry (VSM)
VSM measures magnetic properties including:
5.4. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)
FTIR identifies:
6. Applications
6.1. Data Storage and Magnetic Recording
Magnetic nanoparticles with high coercivity and squareness ratio are essential for high-density data storage media. Sol-gel derived
and barium hexaferrite nanoparticles have been investigated as potential recording media materials [
4].
6.2. Biomedical Applications
Magnetic nanoparticles synthesized via sol-gel auto-combustion find applications in:
Biocompatibility and superparamagnetic behavior at appropriate sizes are critical requirements [
2].
6.3. Environmental Remediation
Magnetic ferrite nanoparticles serve as efficient adsorbents for:
The magnetic property enables easy separation and recovery of the adsorbent material [
20].
6.4. Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Shielding
Ferrite nanomaterials, particularly hexaferrites and composite systems, are employed in EMI shielding and microwave absorption applications due to their magnetic and dielectric losses in the GHz frequency range [
5].
6.5. Catalysis
Spinel ferrites have demonstrated catalytic activity in various reactions including:
7. Challenges and Future Perspectives
Despite its numerous advantages, the sol-gel auto-combustion method faces several challenges:
Process control: The violent nature of combustion makes precise temperature and atmosphere control difficult.
Reproducibility: Batch-to-batch variations in combustion behavior can affect product consistency.
Scale-up: Large-scale synthesis faces heat dissipation and gas evolution challenges.
Environmental concerns: Evolution of NOx gases during combustion requires appropriate handling.
Future research directions include:
Development of green fuels derived from natural sources
Microwave-assisted combustion for improved control
In-situ monitoring of combustion process
Integration with 3D printing for structured materials
Computational modeling for process optimization
8. Conclusion
The sol-gel auto-combustion method has established itself as a powerful and versatile technique for synthesizing magnetic nanomaterials with controlled properties. The method successfully combines the homogeneity advantages of sol-gel processing with the rapid kinetics of combustion synthesis to produce nanocrystalline ferrites at relatively low temperatures. Critical parameters including fuel type, fuel-to-oxidizer ratio, pH, and calcination conditions significantly influence the structural and magnetic properties of the products. The technique has been successfully applied to synthesize a wide range of magnetic materials including spinel ferrites, hexaferrites, and their doped variants. With continued research addressing current challenges, the sol-gel auto-combustion method will remain a key synthesis route for advanced magnetic nanomaterials serving diverse technological applications.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, U.N.; literature survey and analysis, U.N.; writing—original draft preparation, U.N.; writing—review and editing, U.N. The author has read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable. This is a review article and no new datasets were generated or analyzed.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the Department of Physics, COMSATS University Islamabad, Lahore Campus, for providing the academic environment for this work.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Sutka, A., & Mezinskis, G. (2012). Sol-gel auto-combustion synthesis of spinel-type ferrite nanomaterials. Frontiers of Materials Science, 6(2), 128-141. [CrossRef]
- Puli, V.S., Adireddy, S., & Ramana, C.V. (2015). Chemical bonding and magnetic properties of gadolinium (Gd) substituted cobalt ferrite. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 644, 470-475. [CrossRef]
- Smit, J., & Wijn, H.P.J. (1959). Ferrites: Physical Properties of Ferrimagnetic Oxides in Relation to Their Technical Applications. Philips Technical Library.
- Harris, V.G. (2012). Modern microwave ferrites. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 48(3), 1075-1104. [CrossRef]
- Pullar, R.C. (2012). Hexagonal ferrites: A review of the synthesis, properties and applications of hexaferrite ceramics. Progress in Materials Science, 57(7), 1191-1334. [CrossRef]
- Valenzuela, R. (2012). Novel applications of ferrites. Physics Research International, 2012, Article ID 591839.
- Aruna, S.T., & Mukasyan, A.S. (2008). Combustion synthesis and nanomaterials. Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science, 12(3-4), 44-50.
- Costa, A.C.F.M., Tortella, E., Morelli, M.R., & Kiminami, R.H.G.A. (2003). Synthesis, microstructure and magnetic properties of Ni-Zn ferrites. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 256(1-3), 174-182. [CrossRef]
- Kingsley, J.J., & Patil, K.C. (1988). A novel combustion process for the synthesis of fine particle alpha-alumina and related oxide materials. Materials Letters, 6(11-12), 427-432. [CrossRef]
- Mukasyan, A.S., Epstein, P., & Dinka, P. (2007). Solution combustion synthesis of nanomaterials. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 31(2), 1789-1795. [CrossRef]
- Varma, A., Mukasyan, A.S., Rogachev, A.S., & Manukyan, K.V. (2016). Solution combustion synthesis of nanoscale materials. Chemical Reviews, 116(23), 14493-14586. [CrossRef]
- Moore, J.J., & Feng, H.J. (1995). Combustion synthesis of advanced materials: Part I. Reaction parameters. Progress in Materials Science, 39(4-5), 243-273. [CrossRef]
- Jain, S.R., Adiga, K.C., & Pai Verneker, V.R. (1981). A new approach to thermochemical calculations of condensed fuel-oxidizer mixtures. Combustion and Flame, 40, 71-79. [CrossRef]
- Ataie, A., & Mali, A. (2008). Characteristics of barium hexaferrite nanocrystalline powders prepared by a sol-gel combustion method using inorganic agent. Journal of Electroceramics, 21, 357-360. [CrossRef]
- Pechini, M.P. (1967). Method of preparing lead and alkaline earth titanates and niobates and coating method using the same to form a capacitor. U.S. Patent 3,330,697.
- Junliang, L., Yanwei, Z., Cuijing, G., Wei, Z., & Xiaowei, Y. (2010). One-step synthesis of barium hexaferrite nano-powders via microwave-assisted sol-gel auto-combustion. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 30(4), 993-997. [CrossRef]
- Pradeep, A., Priyadharsini, P., & Chandrasekaran, G. (2008). Sol-gel route of synthesis of nanoparticles of MgFe2O4 and XRD, FTIR and VSM study. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 320(21), 2774-2779. [CrossRef]
- Mazaleyrat, F., & Varga, L.K. (2000). Ferromagnetic nanocomposites. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 215-216, 253-259. [CrossRef]
- Sharma, V., Kumari, S., & Kuanr, B.K. (2018). Rare earth doped M-Type hexaferrites: Ferromagnetic resonance and magnetization dynamics. AIP Advances, 8(5), 056232. [CrossRef]
- Kharisov, B.I., Dias, H.V.R., & Kharissova, O.V. (2019). Mini-review: Ferrite nanoparticles in the catalysis. Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 12(7), 1234-1246. [CrossRef]
- Cullity, B.D., & Stock, S.R. (2001). Elements of X-ray Diffraction (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).