1. Introduction
High-resolution land use land cover (HRLULC) maps provide clear advantages over coarse or moderate-resolution maps, especially in highly fragmented landscapes like Bangladesh. Bangladesh is predominantly characterized by flat terrain formed from the alluvial floodplains of numerous rivers, making it one of the most disaster-prone countries in the world [
1,
2,
3]. The country experiences a wide range of natural hazards, including tropical cyclones, floods, tornadoes, sea-level rise, soil salinization, storm surges, droughts, and heatwaves [
4,
5]. In addition to these environmental challenges, Bangladesh faces a significant demographic pressure due to its persistent population growth [
6,
7,
8]. Together, frequent natural disasters and rapid population expansion are the primary drivers of LULC changes in the country. An accurate HRLULC map is essential for assessing ecosystem and biodiversity risks, ensuring food security, mitigating natural hazards, and supporting effective urban planning and sustainable development [
9,
10,
11]. It also provides critical insights into a range of human-induced processes, including climate change [
12], urban expansion [
13], changes in terrestrial carbon storage [
14], occurrence and impacts of natural disasters [
15], and the development of effective mitigation and adaptation strategies [
16]. As such, LULC maps serve as indispensable tools in environmental modeling, facilitating the understanding of both natural and socio-economic processes. However, the accuracy and reliability of these maps are heavily influenced by the quality and nature of the data used in their development.
Satellite imagery is a widely used and reliable data source for mapping LULC [
17]. Single-temporal datasets often lack sufficient information to capture the dynamic processes of LULC. In contrast, multi-temporal LULC mapping can address these limitations by incorporating temporal variability to provide better classification accuracy [
18,
19,
20]. In recent years, deep learning particularly Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) has demonstrated strong performance across various applications, including image classification [
21,
22,
23], object detection [
24], semantic segmentation [
25,
26], and even pixel-level LULC classification [
27,
28]. CNNs are well-suited for satellite imagery due to their ability to process multi-dimensional spatial data efficiently [
29]. However, conventional CNNs typically perform convolutions along the spatial dimensions of single-time-point imagery, which limits their ability to capture detailed LULC patterns and temporal dynamics. To address this, Hirayama et al. (2022) developed SACLASS2 [
30], a CNN-based classification framework that integrates multi-temporal satellite imagery with down-sampling and fully connected layers for pixel-based classification to preserve spatial detail and improve accuracy. This method has previously been applied to generate 12-category HRLULC maps for Japan [
30] and Vietnam [
31], achieving high overall accuracies of 88.85 % and 90.5 %, respectively.
Several global LULC datasets such as Esri Land Cover [
32], ESA WorldCover [
33], and Dynamic World (DW) [
34] are publicly available. However, their accuracy and consistency often vary across geographic scales, from continental to national and regional levels [
35]. A common limitation of these global products is their LULC classification system offering a limited number of categories, which restricts their applicability for local-scale planning and environmental assessment. Consequently, their performance is often inadequate in ecologically diverse and heterogeneous regions. To overcome these limitations, the development of country-specific, high-resolution LULC maps is essential for accurate land resource monitoring and evidence-based policymaking.
Bangladesh lacks an up-to-date, national-scale, high-resolution time-series-based LULC dataset. The only major national initiative to date is the Land Cover Atlas of Bangladesh 2015 [
36], developed using commercial SPOT satellite imagery under the project Strengthening National Forest Inventory and Satellite Land Monitoring System in support of REDD+. However, the atlas has not been updated since its release, significantly limiting its potential for up-to-date land use planning, environmental monitoring, and policy development. In the last decade, several studies have produced small-scale or region-specific LULC maps for various parts of Bangladesh, primarily using single-temporal, moderate or coarse-resolution satellite imagery. These include efforts focused on Greater Dhaka [
37], Chattogram [
38], Gazipur [
39], Bhanga [
40], the RAMSAR site Hakaluki Haor [
41], and Barishal [
42], among others. While these studies provide valuable localized insights, they are limited in the number of categories, geographic scope, unable to provide national-scale land use dynamics for broad-scale environmental assessments and policy planning. To address these limitations, this study aims to develop comprehensive, high-resolution (10 m) LULC maps for Bangladesh at the national scale. The maps have 14 popular LULC categories, including some unique categories, such as jhum, brickfields, and salt pans. In addition, LULC change detection was performed to assess spatial transformations in land cover between 2020 and 2023.
4. Discussion
4.1. Accuracy of HRLULC Maps
A high-resolution (10-meter), 14-category HRLULC map was developed for Bangladesh for the years 2020 and 2023. The maps were generated using a fusion of multi-sensor, multi-temporal, and multi-resolution satellite imagery, complemented by ancillary datasets. The classification achieved an overall accuracy of 94.55% for 2020 and 94.32% for 2023. Several factors contributed to the high classification accuracy and low uncertainty observed in the HRLULC maps. Firstly, a comprehensive training dataset comprising 53,627 points for the year 2023 and 36,412 points for 2020 was collected across the study area. This extensive dataset significantly improved the performance of the CNN classifier by enabling more robust and accurate differentiation among various land cover types. Second, a total of 38 features comprising spectral bands, remote sensing indices, and ancillary data were selected from both satellite imagery and supplementary datasets. Although up to 48 features were tested, no substantial improvement in accuracy was observed beyond 38. Notably, increasing the feature count from 25 to 33 resulted in a 5% gain in accuracy (from 87% to 92%), but further increases yielded diminishing returns while also raising computational costs. Additionally, redundancy among similar indices, such as multiple built-up indices (e.g., normalized difference built-up index, urban index, built-up index), tended to cause misclassification. Therefore, using one representative index per land cover category proved more effective. Third, the integration of optical and SAR data specifically Sentinel-1 and ALOS-2/PALSAR-2 significantly improved classification outcomes. Lastly, the deep learning-based CNN approach outperformed traditional machine learning algorithms such as decision trees, support vector machines (SVM), and random forests, which are commonly used in LULC mapping and change detection [
79].
The mangrove forest coverage in Bangladesh is estimated to be approximately 6,000 km² [
80,
81,
82]. Our HRLULC analysis estimates the mangrove area at approximately 6220.5 ± 121.1 km² in 2020 and 5513.6 ± 91.9 km² in 2023, which closely aligns with previous studies. Similarly, the total area under rubber cultivation in Bangladesh is reported to be around 416.85 km² [
83], which closely matches our remote sensing-based estimates of 466.1 ± 58.3 km² in 2020 and 440.2 ± 42.1 km² in 2023. These results provide strong validation for the accuracy and reliability of the HRLULC maps developed for Bangladesh. According to the official estimate by the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS) [
84], the area under the single cropland category is approximately 20,571.3 km². In comparison, our HRLULC-based estimation for the year 2023 indicates an area of 17,383.0 ± 502.6 km². This relatively close correspondence suggests that our classification is generally reliable. However, the observed deviation may be due to differences in the methodology used for area estimation, such as classification definitions, resolution, or sampling techniques.
4.2. Spatial Details and Comparative Evaluation
Our HRLULC products offer greater spatial detail and pixel-level accuracy compared to global land cover datasets, largely due to their national-scale focus and finer resolution. In rural areas of Bangladesh, most households are surrounded by various tree species particularly fruit trees such as mango, guava, jujube, jackfruit, litchi, and papaya, alongside woody vegetation. Global LULC products often fail to detect small built-up structures obscured by dense vegetation in these settings. In contrast, our map successfully identifies these hidden built-up areas (see
Figure 9). Similarly, riverine bare lands in Bangladesh are frequently misclassified in global maps. Our HRLULC product effectively captures and classifies these areas with improved accuracy.
Our HRLULC maps offer enhanced spatial detail by integrating two types of SAR data alongside optical imagery. ALOS-2/PALSAR-2 provides L-band radar, which penetrates dense vegetation such as forest canopies, improving classification accuracy in areas like mangroves and flooded vegetation. Sentinel-1 supplies C-band radar, which is particularly effective for detecting wetland rice cultivation. Although rice crops were not explicitly classified, most single and multiple cropland areas in Bangladesh are primarily used for rice production, reflecting its status as the national staple. The synergistic use of L-band SAR (ALOS-2), C-band SAR (Sentinel-1), and optical data (Sentinel-2) improves class separability and yields high-resolution LULC maps with enhanced thematic accuracy. We employed a time-feature CNN model, which effectively handles multi-source input data with varying spatial and temporal resolutions. Incorporating time-series information enables the model to capture seasonal dynamics, significantly improving classification performance over traditional single-date approaches. Finally, global LULC products are designed for worldwide application, often sacrificing local accuracy. These broad-scale maps may overlook regional variability and context. In contrast, our maps are locally focused and tailored to the specific conditions of Bangladesh, incorporating local knowledge and data. This localized approach ensures higher accuracy and greater relevance for national and regional applications.
4.3. LULC Conversion from 2020 to 2023
Overall, there has been an increase in single cropland area and a corresponding decrease in bare land across the country. However, this trend is not uniform nationwide (see
Figure 16). The most notable expansion of single cropland has occurred in the Khulna and Sylhet Divisions (see
Figure 13). Khulna, located adjacent to the coast, is frequently affected by tropical cyclones, storm surges and tidal floods, which contribute to saline water intrusion. This salinity plays a significant role in shifting agricultural practices from multiple cropping systems to single cropland. Additionally, the growing presence of aquaculture particularly shrimp farming in this region has further contributed to the expansion of single cropland, as the same land is often used for dual purposes. Flash floods, sudden and rapid flooding triggered by intense rainfall within a short period [
85], are common natural hazards in the northeastern region of Bangladesh, particularly in the Sylhet area. These recurrent flood events frequently damage agricultural crops, households, and infrastructure [
86,
87,
88]. As a result, farmers in the region are increasingly shifting to single cropping practices to minimize potential losses and adapt to the unpredictable flood conditions.
The Bare land category, comprising mainly char lands (riverine islands) and fallow land, experienced a significant decline of −3173.8 ± 570.5 km² over the study period. In COVID-19 context, governmental advocacy “don’t leave an inch of land uncultivable”, modern agricultural technologies, along with population pressure, has likely contributed to the expansion of agricultural land and decline of bare land. According to
Figure 14, one of the bare land decrease hotspots is located in Purbachal. This area was previously bare land. To alleviate the growing population pressure on Dhaka, the Government of Bangladesh initiated a planned urban development project in the surrounding areas, aiming to provide high-quality, permanent residential accommodations for the expanding population [
89].
An interesting finding from the 2023 data is the decrease in built-up area over the past three years. This reduction is unusual for a developing country like Bangladesh, where urban expansion is generally expected to follow a continuous upward trend. However, a similar trend was reported by Abdullah et al. (2019) [
90], who observed a sudden decrease in built-up area in 2000, attributed to the devastating flood that severely affected large parts of the country. In a similar context, the years 2022 and 2023 experienced several severe cyclones most notably cyclonic storm Sitrang in October 2022, very severe cyclonic storm Hamoon, and severe cyclonic storm Midhili in late 2023 which may have contributed to the recent decline in built-up areas by damaging infrastructure and displacing settlements. Additionally, urban growth has increasingly taken a vertical form, with more multi-story buildings replacing the need for horizontal expansion. This shift may explain the decline in the built area observed in this study, despite ongoing development. Furthermore, in 2023, orchard areas, especially those related to homestead gardening in rural regions of Bangladesh, where households are commonly surrounded by a diverse mix of fruit and woody tree species, exhibited increased vegetation density. As a result, some small rural built-up areas are misclassified as orchards rather than accurately identified as built-up.
Jhum cultivation areas increased by approximately 39.25 ± 34.43%, indicating a rise in shifting cultivation practices among the indigenous communities of the Chattogram Hill Tracts (CHT). Although the uncertainty of this estimate is high, a recent study reveals that tribal farmers now cultivate around 30 different crop varieties through Jhum, compared to only 15–20 varieties in previous years [
91]. This suggests a more intensive and diversified use of Jhum cultivation than in the past. An upward trend in Jhum cultivation, as reported by the Department of Agricultural Extension [
92], supports the findings presented in this study.
According to our estimation, mangrove forest coverage in Bangladesh declined by approximately 11.36 ± 2.44% between 2020 and 2023. Recent studies have also documented a continued reduction in mangrove extent, primarily driven by deforestation, urban expansion, and changing agricultural practices [
93,
94]. These findings highlight the growing pressure on mangrove ecosystems and the need for strengthened conservation efforts.
Aquaculture is one of the most prominent and rapidly growing sectors in Bangladesh, playing a vital role in nutrition, livelihoods, and national economic development. In many regions, it has proven to be more profitable than traditional crop farming, leading to a noticeable shift among farmers toward aquaculture-based practices. The sector has demonstrated a steady upward trend from 2001 to 2022 [
95]. This aligns with the findings of the present study, which observed an increase in aquaculture area from 5732.5 ± 232.6 km² in 2020 to 6888.5 ± 161.5 km² in 2023.
Salt farming and processing in Bangladesh holds significant potential for improving livelihoods in vulnerable coastal communities [
96]. However, our study reveals that the area under salt pans has decreased by approximately −47.38 ± 16.32% between 2020 and 2023, indicating a notable contraction of this land use category. According to the Land Cover Atlas of Bangladesh (2015), the area was estimated to be 373 km² [
36]. In comparison, our HRLULC data show that the area was 480.8 ± 70.1 km² in 2020, which closely aligns with the 2015 estimate. However, by 2023, this area had declined significantly to 253.0 ± 35.2 km².
4.4. Impact of Land Use Land Cover Changes
LULC changes have profound and far-reaching impacts on both the environment and the socio-economic well-being of communities. Bangladesh, with its high population density, relies heavily on agricultural land and aquaculture ponds to sustain its growing population. According to the findings of this study, both agricultural and aquaculture areas have expanded in recent years. This expansion has contributed to Bangladesh’s official attainment of self-sufficiency in food production, particularly in staple food grains and freshwater fish [
97]. Although the expansion of multiple cropland areas observed in this study is not statistically significant (0.84 ± 1.14%), multiple cropping still occupies a substantial portion of the land cover. This dominance may not always be favorable for sustainable crop production. Continuous cultivation of the same land throughout the year exerts considerable pressure on soil fertility and productivity, potentially leading to long-term degradation of agricultural land [
98]. On the other hand, the increasing single cropland area may pose risks to long-term food security.
The decline in bare land particularly char lands and fallow lands has contributed significantly to achieving national food security. This transformation is largely attributed to the adoption of advanced agricultural technologies and practices [
99]. According to
Figure 14, the decrease in bare land along the Padma River can be seen as a positive impact, as these char lands are increasingly being converted into cultivated areas. In contrast, the reduction of bare land in the capital city, Dhaka, is viewed as a negative trend, as it leads to the loss of open and free spaces, contributing to increased urban density and reduced livability for city dwellers. The decrease in bare land in the Purbachal area may help alleviate the housing shortage in Dhaka by reducing pressure on the capital through the development of planned residential zones.
In the past, Jhum was the primary cultivation practice for farmers in the CHT. Although agricultural technologies have modernized in recent years offering alternatives to shifting cultivation many farmers continue to practice Jhum. This persistence is largely due to their long-standing familiarity with the method, as they have been trained in Jhum culture for decades, making it difficult for them to transition to other forms of agriculture [
91]. Jhum remains the primary food production system for many ethnic minority communities; however, it poses negative impacts not only on the soil of the cultivated land but also on the surrounding environment [
100] and the broader ecosystem (lose of different types of bird and animal species) [
101].
During the study period, brickfield areas increased by 1,019.6 ± 460.3 km². Although this change may seem relatively limited in spatial extent, as it is accompanied by a high uncertainty of ±25.33%. Despite its contribution to the national economy, the brick sector presents significant environmental and social challenges. Brick production leads to soil degradation and reduced agricultural productivity [
102], the depletion of natural resources [
103], and increased air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions [
104]. Moreover, it is associated with serious health risks [
105] and persistent social issues, including labor rights violations and gender-based discrimination [
106].
The findings related to mangrove forests are particularly alarming. Within just three years, approximately 706.9 ± 152.0 km² of natural mangrove cover has been lost. This sharp decline raises significant concern, as mangroves offer a wide range of critical ecosystem services, including phytoremediation, carbon sequestration, and the regulation of hydrological and ecological processes [
107]. Furthermore, mangroves serve as a natural barrier against tropical cyclones, playing a crucial role in protecting coastal communities and sustaining their livelihoods. Continued degradation of mangrove ecosystems threatens these essential functions and could severely disrupt coastal food webs. The resulting ecological imbalance would likely have far-reaching socio-economic consequences, particularly for vulnerable coastal populations that depend heavily on these natural resources for their survival and well-being.
Salt has traditionally been produced in the southeastern coastal region of Bangladesh through the use of open salt pans. As a highly commercialized commodity with substantial global demand, sea salt plays a critical role in both domestic and international markets. Despite its widespread use, the livelihoods of many coastal communities in Bangladesh remain heavily dependent on small-scale salt production. However, a noticeable decline in the area devoted to salt pans poses a serious threat to the socio-economic stability of these communities. This trend also carries broader national implications, as salt in Bangladesh is consumed across three main sectors: human consumption, animal feed, and industrial applications. A reduction in domestic production could disrupt the national salt supply and adversely affect the economic well-being of those engaged in the industry.
Overall, the built-up area shows a net decrease; however, a visual inspection of the HRLULC map reveals localized increases in built-up areas near major cities. In contrast, more remote regions, particularly those far from the capital, have experienced a notable decline in built-up land. This pattern is likely driven by population migration toward urban centers, which in turn places increased pressure on city infrastructure and resources.
4.5. Scope of Development
Bangladesh exhibits a highly diverse and dynamic landscape; however, due to time and resource limitations, several important LULC categories were not incorporated into the HRLULC maps developed for 2020 and 2023. As a rice-dominant nation, the inclusion of a dedicated rice paddy category in future iterations is strongly recommended, given its substantial agricultural and economic significance. Further refinement within the forest category is also advisable, particularly by differentiating between evergreen, deciduous, and plantation forests. In the southern region, brackish water aquaculture commonly associated with shrimp farming constitutes a major land use and warrants recognition as a distinct subcategory under aquaculture ponds. Additionally, Bangladesh’s high population density and rapidly evolving land use practices introduce challenges related to seasonal variability. For instance, in the southeastern coastal zone, shrimp ponds are often converted into salt pans during the dry season, while char lands (riverine islands formed by sediment deposition) are cultivated only during specific months. These dynamic land use patterns highlight the need for developing dynamic LULC maps, which represent a promising direction for future research.
5. Conclusions
Satellite remote sensing remains a robust and reliable approach for generating LULC maps. This study developed national-scale, high-resolution (10 m) LULC maps for Bangladesh for the years 2020 and 2023 using a time-series CNN model that integrates both optical and SAR data. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first national-scale LULC maps of Bangladesh produced at this resolution using multi-temporal inputs and encompassing a comprehensive classification of 14 land cover categories. Locally significant but often underrepresented LULC types such as brickfields, salt pans, jhum cultivation, and aquaculture ponds were successfully identified. The resulting HRLULC datasets offer valuable support for environmental monitoring, agricultural planning, and policy development, particularly for government agencies such as the Ministries of Agriculture, Fisheries and Livestock, and Environment. The study also reveals notable LULC changes in single cropland, aquaculture ponds, built-up areas, brickfields, salt pans, and bare land. Brickfields, often located near croplands, present environmental challenges due to pollution and land degradation. Meanwhile, the rapid expansion of aquaculture ponds, though beneficial for food security, may reduce cropland availability, raising concerns about long-term sustainability. These dynamic changes, driven by growing food security needs and recurring natural disasters, underscore the critical need for frequent, high-resolution LULC monitoring to inform sustainable land management and resource planning.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, M.M.S. and K.N.N.; methodology, M.M.S. and V.T.T.; software, V.T.T., S.H., N.H., and Y.M.; data curation, M.M.S., D.C., and S.C.; formal analysis, M.M.S.; investigation, S.I., D.C., and M.A.A.B.; resources, S.H., T.T., and K.N.N.; validation, M.I.P., S.C., S.I., and M.A.A.B.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M.S.; writing—review and editing, D.C., Y.M., and K.N.N.; visualization, M.M.S., M.I.P., and N.H.; supervision, K.N.N.; project administration, K.N.N.; funding acquisition, S.H., T.T., and K.N.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Figure 1.
Study area overview. (a) Location of Bangladesh on the world map. (b) Administrative Divisions of Bangladesh, highlighting the regions visited during fieldwork for ground-truth data collection. Data source:
https://data.humdata.org/
Figure 1.
Study area overview. (a) Location of Bangladesh on the world map. (b) Administrative Divisions of Bangladesh, highlighting the regions visited during fieldwork for ground-truth data collection. Data source:
https://data.humdata.org/
Figure 2.
Spatial distribution of training and validation points across Bangladesh. Panel (a) shows the distribution of training data collected over each 1°×1° tile, while panel (b) presents the validation data obtained through stratified random sampling.
Figure 2.
Spatial distribution of training and validation points across Bangladesh. Panel (a) shows the distribution of training data collected over each 1°×1° tile, while panel (b) presents the validation data obtained through stratified random sampling.
Figure 3.
Devices utilized during field trips for collecting reference data.
Figure 3.
Devices utilized during field trips for collecting reference data.
Figure 4.
Example images of diverse LULC categories, accompanied by their respective coordinates, gathered during fieldwork activities.
Figure 4.
Example images of diverse LULC categories, accompanied by their respective coordinates, gathered during fieldwork activities.
Figure 5.
Workflow of the SACLASS2 classification algorithm, utilizing a modified Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) structure adapted from Hirayama et al. (2022) [
30].
Figure 5.
Workflow of the SACLASS2 classification algorithm, utilizing a modified Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) structure adapted from Hirayama et al. (2022) [
30].
Figure 6.
Comparison of land cover classification results using Sentinel-1 (SAR), Sentinel-2 (optical), and a fused Sentinel-1, PALSAR-2, and Sentinel-2 dataset, evaluated against the reference true-color Sentinel-2 Level-2A imagery.
Figure 6.
Comparison of land cover classification results using Sentinel-1 (SAR), Sentinel-2 (optical), and a fused Sentinel-1, PALSAR-2, and Sentinel-2 dataset, evaluated against the reference true-color Sentinel-2 Level-2A imagery.
Figure 7.
High - resolution land use land cover (HRLULC) maps of Bangladesh for the years 2020 and 2023.
Figure 7.
High - resolution land use land cover (HRLULC) maps of Bangladesh for the years 2020 and 2023.
Figure 8.
Distinct identification of brickfields, aquaculture ponds, and salt pans in the HRLULC map of Bangladesh, compared with PlanetScope imagery.
Figure 8.
Distinct identification of brickfields, aquaculture ponds, and salt pans in the HRLULC map of Bangladesh, compared with PlanetScope imagery.
Figure 9.
Comparative visualization of the HRLULC map developed in this study and existing global LULC products across three selected sites. PlanetScope imagery is used as a high-resolution ground reference for visual assessment.
Figure 9.
Comparative visualization of the HRLULC map developed in this study and existing global LULC products across three selected sites. PlanetScope imagery is used as a high-resolution ground reference for visual assessment.
Figure 10.
Pairwise comparison between our HRLULC map and three global land cover datasets (ESA WorldCover, Esri Land Cover, and Dynamic World). Orange indicates matched pixels, while red represents mismatched pixels.
Figure 10.
Pairwise comparison between our HRLULC map and three global land cover datasets (ESA WorldCover, Esri Land Cover, and Dynamic World). Orange indicates matched pixels, while red represents mismatched pixels.
Figure 11.
Percentage of matched pixels by category across pairwise comparisons between the our HRLULC map and global products (ESA, ESRI, DW).
Figure 11.
Percentage of matched pixels by category across pairwise comparisons between the our HRLULC map and global products (ESA, ESRI, DW).
Figure 12.
Percentage change in LULC categories in Bangladesh between 2020 and 2023, including associated uncertainties represented as 95 % confidence intervals.
Figure 12.
Percentage change in LULC categories in Bangladesh between 2020 and 2023, including associated uncertainties represented as 95 % confidence intervals.
Figure 13.
Spatial distribution of single cropland expansion hotspots in Bangladesh: (a) Khulna Division, primarily representing coastal regions; (b) Sylhet Division, predominantly covering the haor wetland areas.
Figure 13.
Spatial distribution of single cropland expansion hotspots in Bangladesh: (a) Khulna Division, primarily representing coastal regions; (b) Sylhet Division, predominantly covering the haor wetland areas.
Figure 14.
Spatial distribution of areas where bare land decreased between 2020 and 2023, based on LULC change detection analysis. (b) Purbachal new town development area, (c) Dhaka metropolitan region, (d) Riverine islands (chars) along the Padma River.
Figure 14.
Spatial distribution of areas where bare land decreased between 2020 and 2023, based on LULC change detection analysis. (b) Purbachal new town development area, (c) Dhaka metropolitan region, (d) Riverine islands (chars) along the Padma River.
Figure 15.
Spatial distribution of newly established brickfields in 2023, derived from high-resolution LULC classification and change detection analysis.
Figure 15.
Spatial distribution of newly established brickfields in 2023, derived from high-resolution LULC classification and change detection analysis.
Figure 16.
Changes in LULC across the administrative divisions of Bangladesh between 2020 and 2023. LULC categories are denoted as follows: 1 – Water, 2 – Built-up, 3 – Single cropland, 4 – Multiple cropland, 5 – Aquaculture, 6 – Orchards, 7 – Brickfield, 8 – Forest, 9 – Mangrove, 10 – Salt pans, 11 – Rubber tree, 12 – Jhum, 13 – Bare land, 14 – Tea garden.
Figure 16.
Changes in LULC across the administrative divisions of Bangladesh between 2020 and 2023. LULC categories are denoted as follows: 1 – Water, 2 – Built-up, 3 – Single cropland, 4 – Multiple cropland, 5 – Aquaculture, 6 – Orchards, 7 – Brickfield, 8 – Forest, 9 – Mangrove, 10 – Salt pans, 11 – Rubber tree, 12 – Jhum, 13 – Bare land, 14 – Tea garden.
Figure 17.
Sankey diagram showing LULC transitions in Bangladesh between 2020 and 2023, where the width of each link indicates the magnitude of land area changing from one LULC category to another.
Figure 17.
Sankey diagram showing LULC transitions in Bangladesh between 2020 and 2023, where the width of each link indicates the magnitude of land area changing from one LULC category to another.
Table 1.
Land use land cover (LULC) category definitions employed in the study, detailing the classifications applied for analysis.
Table 1.
Land use land cover (LULC) category definitions employed in the study, detailing the classifications applied for analysis.
| ID |
Color |
Category |
Definition |
| 1 |
#000064 |
Water |
Areas covered by open water bodies like rivers, seas, and oceans. |
| 2 |
#FF0000 |
Built-up |
Lands covered by buildings, paved roads, and other man-made infrastructure. |
| 3 |
#FF7F7F |
Single cropland |
Fields where agricultural crops are typically grown once a year. |
| 4 |
#FFC1BF |
Multiple cropland |
Lands used multiple times annually for crop production. |
| 5 |
#4D68FF |
Aquaculture |
Inland ponds used for cultivating aquatic organisms like fish, shrimps, or crabs. |
| 6 |
#80FF00 |
Orchards |
Lands with fruit trees and homestead gardens in rural areas. |
| 7 |
#A0A0A0 |
Brickfield |
Areas where clay is extracted and processed to make bricks. |
| 8 |
#006400 |
Forest |
Lands dominated by woody vegetation, including evergreen and deciduous trees. |
| 9 |
#013A24 |
Mangrove |
Trees and shrubs growing in saline or brackish tidal coastal zones. |
| 10 |
#F0F0F0 |
Salt pans |
Lands which are used for salt production from seawater by solar evaporation. |
| 11 |
#A1556B |
Rubber tree |
Monoculture areas where rubber trees are cultivated for latex production. |
| 12 |
#4B7B4E |
Jhum |
Traditional shifting cultivation involving forest clearing for temporary farming. |
| 13 |
#806400 |
Bare land |
Exposed soil, unpaved road, riverine island, fallow areas and, playgrounds. |
| 14 |
#5ECC7E |
Tea garden |
Areas where tea plant is cultivated, often shaded by large trees. |
Table 2.
Spatial resolution and wavelength information for each spectral band of the Sentinel - 2 Multi-Spectral Instrument (MSI).
Table 2.
Spatial resolution and wavelength information for each spectral band of the Sentinel - 2 Multi-Spectral Instrument (MSI).
| Band |
Electromagnetic Region |
Center Wavelength [nm] |
Spatial Resolution [m] |
| B2 |
Blue |
490 |
10 |
| B3 |
Green |
560 |
10 |
| B4 |
Red |
665 |
10 |
| B5 |
Red Edge 1 |
705 |
20 |
| B6 |
Red Edge 2 |
740 |
20 |
| B7 |
Red Edge 3 |
783 |
20 |
| B8 |
NIR (Near-Infrared) |
833 |
10 |
| B8A |
Red Edge 4 |
865 |
20 |
| B11 |
SWIR 1 |
1610 |
20 |
| B12 |
SWIR 2 |
2190 |
20 |
Table 3.
Bengali seasons alongside their corresponding English names and temporal spans.
Table 3.
Bengali seasons alongside their corresponding English names and temporal spans.
| Season No. |
Bengali Season |
English Season |
Season Span |
| Season-1 |
Grisma |
Summer |
Mid-April to Mid-June |
| Season-2 |
Barsa |
Rainy |
Mid-June to Mid-August |
| Season-3 |
Sharat |
Autumn |
Mid-August to Mid-October |
| Season-4 |
Hemanta |
Late Autumn |
Mid-October to Mid-December |
| Season-5 |
Shit |
Winter |
Mid-December to Mid-February |
| Season-6 |
Basanta |
Spring |
Mid-February to Mid-April |
Table 4.
Indices calculated from different bands of optical and SAR imagery.
Table 4.
Indices calculated from different bands of optical and SAR imagery.
| Index |
Formula |
Reference |
| NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) |
|
[60] |
| EVI (Enhanced Vegetation Index) |
|
[61] |
| GRVI (Green-Red Vegetation Index) |
|
[62] |
| GSI (Green Soil Index) |
|
[63] |
| MNDWI (Modified Normalized Difference Water Index) |
|
[64] |
| BSI (Bare Soil Index) |
|
[65] |
| NDPI (Normalized Difference Pond Index) |
|
[66] |
| NDTI (Normalized Difference Tillage Index) |
|
[67] |
| NDVIre (Red Edge Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) |
|
[68] |
| RVI (Radar Vegetation Index) |
|
[69] |
Table 5.
Data sources and feature variables employed in the development of HRLULC products for Bangladesh.
Table 5.
Data sources and feature variables employed in the development of HRLULC products for Bangladesh.
| Input Data |
Processing Level |
Spatial Resolution |
Features |
Features No. |
| Sentinel-1 |
Level 1C |
10 m (SAR) |
VH, VV, VH-VV, VH/VV, VH_avg, VV_avg, VH_diss, VV_diss, RVI |
9 |
| Sentinel-2 |
Level 2A |
10 & 20 m (Optical) |
B2, B3, B4, B5, B6, B7, B8, B8A, B11, B12, NDVI, EVI, GRVI, BSI, NDPI, NDTI, MNDWI, NDVIre, GSI |
19 |
| AW3D30 |
Version 2.1 |
30 m |
DSM, slope and aspect |
3 |
| PALSAR-2 |
Level 2.2 |
25 m (SAR) |
HH, HV, LIN |
3 |
| OpenStreetMap |
– |
– |
Distance from road and river |
2 |
| Reference data |
– |
10 m |
Latitude and longitude |
2 |
Table 6.
Error matrix of sample counts, . Map categories are the rows while the reference categories are the columns.
Table 6.
Error matrix of sample counts, . Map categories are the rows while the reference categories are the columns.
| Class |
1 |
2 |
… |
q |
Total |
| 1 |
|
|
… |
|
|
| 2 |
|
|
… |
|
|
| ⋮ |
⋮ |
⋮ |
⋱ |
⋮ |
⋮ |
| q |
|
|
… |
|
|
| Total |
|
|
… |
|
n |
Table 7.
Error matrix of estimated area proportions,
(Equation
6). Map categories are the rows while the reference categories are the columns.
Table 7.
Error matrix of estimated area proportions,
(Equation
6). Map categories are the rows while the reference categories are the columns.
| Class |
1 |
2 |
… |
q |
Total |
| 1 |
|
|
… |
|
|
| 2 |
|
|
… |
|
|
| ⋮ |
⋮ |
⋮ |
⋱ |
⋮ |
⋮ |
| q |
|
|
… |
|
|
| Total |
|
|
… |
|
1 |
Table 8.
Comparison of producer accuracy (PA) and user accuracy (UA) with 95% confidence intervals across different LULC categories for the years 2020 and 2023.
Table 8.
Comparison of producer accuracy (PA) and user accuracy (UA) with 95% confidence intervals across different LULC categories for the years 2020 and 2023.
| LULC Category |
2020 PA (%) ± Error |
2020 UA (%) ± Error |
2023 PA (%) ± Error |
2023 UA (%) ± Error |
| Water |
93.76 ± 1.08 |
94.87 ± 0.97 |
93.03 ± 1.08 |
96.04 ± 0.81 |
| Built-up |
95.21 ± 0.68 |
95.79 ± 0.64 |
92.86 ± 0.81 |
96.25 ± 0.59 |
| Single cropland |
94.96 ± 0.94 |
93.22 ± 1.09 |
95.37 ± 0.86 |
93.76 ± 1.00 |
| Multiple cropland |
98.07 ± 0.35 |
96.65 ± 0.46 |
98.90 ± 0.26 |
98.39 ± 0.32 |
| Aquaculture |
95.41 ± 0.61 |
97.53 ± 0.45 |
98.27 ± 0.36 |
98.27 ± 0.36 |
| Orchards |
96.14 ± 0.53 |
94.89 ± 0.61 |
94.15 ± 0.66 |
94.82 ± 0.62 |
| Brickfield |
95.07 ± 0.58 |
95.70 ± 0.55 |
93.86 ± 0.64 |
91.29 ± 0.76 |
| Forest |
97.15 ± 0.38 |
95.56 ± 0.47 |
97.07 ± 0.37 |
93.93 ± 0.54 |
| Mangrove |
97.52 ± 0.92 |
96.15 ± 1.15 |
97.57 ± 0.92 |
98.94 ± 0.60 |
| Salt pans |
96.74 ± 1.82 |
92.71 ± 2.73 |
96.34 ± 2.09 |
96.34 ± 2.09 |
| Rubber tree |
96.30 ± 1.29 |
96.74 ± 1.21 |
98.88 ± 1.12 |
98.88 ± 1.12 |
| Jhum |
62.44 ± 3.73 |
75.29 ± 3.02 |
50.25 ± 4.23 |
70.92 ± 3.23 |
| Bare land |
85.55 ± 1.09 |
86.38 ± 1.06 |
86.91 ± 0.99 |
86.99 ± 0.98 |
| Tea garden |
94.58 ± 1.24 |
93.45 ± 1.36 |
96.22 ± 1.02 |
95.11 ± 1.16 |
| Average |
92.78 ± 1.37 |
93.21 ± 1.37 |
92.12 ± 1.47 |
93.57 ± 1.26 |
| Overall Accuracy |
94.55% ± 0.41% |
94.32% ± 0.42% |
| Kappa Coefficient |
0.939 |
0.936 |
Table 9.
Adjusted area and percentage changes in LULC categories in Bangladesh between 2020 and 2023, including associated uncertainties (±) at the 95% confidence interval, calculated following the methodology proposed by Olofsson et al. (2014) [
75].
Table 9.
Adjusted area and percentage changes in LULC categories in Bangladesh between 2020 and 2023, including associated uncertainties (±) at the 95% confidence interval, calculated following the methodology proposed by Olofsson et al. (2014) [
75].
| LULC Category |
2020 |
2023 |
Change over 2020–2023 |
| |
(km2)
|
(%) |
(km2) |
(%) |
(km2) |
(%) |
| Water |
10096.6 ± 253.0 |
6.86 ± 0.17 |
10385.4 ± 277.6 |
7.05 ± 0.19 |
288.7 ± 375.6 |
2.86 ± 3.72 |
| Built-up |
8816.6 ± 203.7 |
5.99 ± 0.14 |
7597.2 ± 104.0 |
5.16 ± 0.07 |
-1219.4 ± 228.7 |
-13.83 ± 2.59 |
| Single cropland |
14827.7 ± 337.9 |
10.07 ± 0.23 |
17383.0 ± 502.6 |
11.81 ± 0.34 |
2555.2 ± 605.7 |
17.23 ± 4.08 |
| Multiple cropland |
45319.9 ± 375.6 |
30.78 ± 0.26 |
45701.5 ± 353.7 |
31.04 ± 0.24 |
381.6 ± 515.9 |
0.84 ± 1.14 |
| Aquaculture |
5732.5 ± 232.6 |
3.89 ± 0.16 |
6888.5 ± 161.5 |
4.68 ± 0.11 |
1156.1 ± 283.2 |
20.17 ± 4.94 |
| Orchards |
26826.5 ± 324.4 |
18.22 ± 0.22 |
25874.3 ± 388.4 |
17.57 ± 0.26 |
-952.2 ± 506.0 |
-3.55 ± 1.89 |
| Brickfield |
1817.1 ± 223.9 |
1.23 ± 0.15 |
2836.8 ± 402.1 |
1.93 ± 0.27 |
1019.6 ± 460.3 |
56.11 ± 25.33 |
| Forest |
9668.8 ± 199.8 |
6.57 ± 0.14 |
10686.3 ± 273.0 |
7.26 ± 0.19 |
1017.5 ± 338.3 |
10.52 ± 3.50 |
| Mangrove |
6220.5 ± 121.1 |
4.22 ± 0.08 |
5513.6 ± 91.9 |
3.74 ± 0.06 |
-706.9 ± 152.0 |
-11.36 ± 2.44 |
| Salt pans |
480.8 ± 70.1 |
0.33 ± 0.05 |
253.0 ± 35.2 |
0.17 ± 0.02 |
-227.8 ± 78.5 |
-47.38 ± 16.32 |
| Rubber tree |
466.1 ± 58.3 |
0.32 ± 0.04 |
440.2 ± 42.1 |
0.30 ± 0.03 |
-25.9 ± 72.0 |
-5.56 ± 15.44 |
| Jhum |
665.1 ± 150.1 |
0.45 ± 0.10 |
926.1 ± 172.9 |
0.63 ± 0.12 |
261.1 ± 229.0 |
39.25 ± 34.43 |
| Bare land |
13353.3 ± 450.8 |
9.07 ± 0.31 |
10179.6 ± 349.6 |
6.91 ± 0.24 |
-3173.8 ± 570.5 |
-23.77 ± 4.27 |
| Tea garden |
2950.6 ± 119.0 |
2.00 ± 0.08 |
2571.7 ± 156.7 |
1.75 ± 0.11 |
-378.9 ± 196.8 |
-12.84 ± 6.67 |