Submitted:
08 September 2025
Posted:
11 September 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Data and Methods
2.1. Research Approach
2.2. Overview of the Study Area
2.3. Data Sources
2.4. Trend Analysis and Mutability Tests
2.5. Interpolation Extension Reduction Calculation
2.6. SWAT Hydrologic Model
2.7. Quantification and Evaluation of Blue-Green Water Resources
2.8. Assessment of the Security of Supply and Demand for Blue and Green Water
2.9. Inter-Regional Allocation of Blue Water Volumes
3. Results and Analysis
3.1. Runoff Trends and Sudden Points of Change
3.2. Rate Determination and Validation of the SWAT Model
3.3. Characterization of the Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Blue-Green Water Resources
3.3.1. Inter-Annual Variability
3.3.2. Spatial Distribution
3.4. Assessment of the Balance Between Supply and Demand of Blue and Green Water Resources
3.4.1. Statistical Analysis of the Balance of Supply and Demand for Blue-Green Water Resources
3.4.2. Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Blue-Green Water Supply and Demand Security
3.5. Quantity of Water Resources Available for Interregional Allocation
4. Deliberation
4.1. The Contradiction Between the Supply and Demand of Blue and Green Water Resources in the Basin and Its Regulation
4.2. SWAT Model Uncertainty
5. Conclusion
- (1)
- The R2 and NSE of the model rate period and the verification period are both ≥ 0.7. The results show that the simulated flow values have a good consistency with the measured values, verifying the applicability of the SWAT model in the study of blue and green water resources in this basin.
- (2)
- Analyzing the time scale of the entire basin, the amount of green water resources is approximately 1.95 times that of blue water resources, which dominate the basin's water cycle. During the period from 2002 to 2021, the demand of the blue water system was greater than the available amount, showing a continuous deficit state, while the demand of the green water system was approximately equal to the available amount, maintaining a basic balance between supply and demand.
- (3)
- From the perspective of the spatial pattern of each sub-basin, blue water resources showed significant spatial heterogeneity from 2002 to 2021. Approximately 50% of the sub-basins, mainly distributed in the upper and middle reaches irrigation areas and desert zones, were in a state of supply and demand imbalance. In contrast, the Green Water assessment index is all < 1, demonstrating good spatial balance, high resource security and strong stability.
- (4)
- The analysis of cross-regional allocation potential shows that the average annual theoretical blue water resources that can be allocated during the study period amounted to 4.06 × 10⁸ m³, showing a strong potential for optimal allocation of regional water resources.
Funding
References
- Qiting Zuo, Desheng Hu, Ming Dou, et al. Research framework and core system of the strictest water resources management system based on the concept of human-water harmony [J]. Resource Science 2014, 36, 906912.
- Jun Xia, Jinliang Zhai, Chesheng Zhan. Some thoughts on the research and development of water resources in China. Progress in Earth Science 2011, 26, 905–915.
- Jing Tian, Shenglian Guo, Dedi Liu, Qihui Chen, Qiang Wang, Jiabo Yin, Xushu Wu, Shaokun He. Impacts of climate and land use change on runoff in the Han River Basin. Journal of Geography 2020, 75, 2307–2318.
- Lu Hao, Ge Sun. A review of studies on the impact of urbanization on ecohydrological processes in watersheds. Journal of Ecology 2021, 41, 13–26.
- Falkenmark, M.; Rockström, J. Building Water Resilience in the Face of Global Change: From a Blue-Only to a Green-Blue Water Approach to Land-Water Management. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 2010, 136, 606–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Veettil, A.V.; Mishra, A.K. Potential influence of climate and anthropogenic variables on water security using blue and green water scarcity, Falkenmark index, and freshwater provision indicator. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 228, 346–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Falkenmark, M.; Rockström, J. The New Blue and Green Water Paradigm: Breaking New Ground for Water Resources Planning and Management. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 2006, 132, 129–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yen, H.; Park, S.; Arnold, J.G.; Srinivasan, R.; Chawanda, C.J.; Wang, R.; Feng, Q.; Wu, J.; Miao, C.; Bieger, K.; et al. IPEAT+: A Built-In Optimization and Automatic Calibration Tool of SWAT+. Water 2019, 11, 1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, C.; Zhou, J.; Tayyab, M.; Zhu, S.; Zhang, H. Integrating Artificial Neural Networks into the VIC Model for Rainfall-Runoff Modeling. Water 2016, 8, 407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, D.; Chen, J.; Fang, J. Simulation of Summer Hourly Stream Flow by Applying TOPMODEL and Two Routing Algorithms to the Sparsely Gauged Lhasa River Basin in China. Water 2015, 7, 4041–4053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wenhua Qi, Yehua Jin, Zhenhao Yin, et al. Analysis of blue-green water supply and demand balance in the Tumen River Basin based on SWAT model [J]. Journal of Ecology, 2023, 43(08): 3116-3127. Journal of Ecology 2023, 43, 3116–3127.
- Hao Yang, Fuquan Ni, Yu Deng, et al. Characteristics of spatial and temporal changes of blue and green water resources in Jialing River Basin based on SWAT model [J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering 2022, 33, 18–26.
- Yikang Gao, Yueying Zhou, Zufa Liu, et al. SWAT-based assessment of blue-green water and its drought response in the Beijiang River Basin [J]. Journal of Changjiang Academy of Sciences 2021, 38, 18–26.
- Abate, B.Z.; Alaminie, A.A.; Assefa, T.T.; Tigabu, T.B.; He, L. Modeling climate change impacts on blue and green water of the Kobo-Golina River in data-scarce upper Danakil basin, Ethiopia. J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud. 2024, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woldesenbet, T.A. Impact of land use and land cover dynamics on ecologically-relevant flows and blue-green water resources. Ecohydrol. Hydrobiol. 2022, 22, 420–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koycegiz, C.; Buyukyildiz, M. Calibration of SWAT and Two Data-Driven Models for a Data-Scarce Mountainous Headwater in Semi-Arid Konya Closed Basin. Water 2019, 11, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nkwasa, A.; Chawanda, C.J.; Msigwa, A.; Komakech, H.C.; Verbeiren, B.; van Griensven, A. How Can We Represent Seasonal Land Use Dynamics in SWAT and SWAT+ Models for African Cultivated Catchments? Water 2020, 12, 1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yusen Wang. Development and application of hydrological time series trend and mutation analysis system [J]. Gansu Science and Technology, 2016, 32(9): 36-37.
- Shan, C.; Zhao, F.; Wang, Y.; Yang, C.; Wei, F.; Zhou, X. Study on the Evolvement Trend Process of Hydrological Elements in Luanhe River Basin, China. Water 2024, 16, 1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ishak, E.; Rahman, A. Examination of Changes in Flood Data in Australia. Water 2019, 11, 1734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Xiao, W.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Hou, B.; Lu, C. The Impact of Climate Change on the Duration and Division of Flood Season in the Fenhe River Basin, China. Water 2016, 8, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- LIU X, ZHANG W, JIA D, et al. Research of Abrupt Changes of Sandstorm Frequency in Hexi Corridor in Recent 50 Years[J]. , 2011, 31(6): 1579-1584. Journal of Desert Research 2011, 31, 1579–1584.
- Neitsch S, Armold J, Kiniry J, Williams J R. Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation version 2009. Texas Water Resources Institute, 2011.
- Wenting Li, Shaoli Yang, Liliang Ren, et al. Characterization of spatial and temporal distribution of blue/green water resources in the Yellow River source area based on SWAT model [J]. China Rural Water Conservancy and Hydropower, 2021(8): 59-66.
- Moriasi, D.N.; Arnold, J.G.; van Liew, M.W.; Bingner, R.L.; Harmel, R.D.; Veith, T.L. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans. ASABE 2007, 50, 885–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, J.; Lyu, L.; Han, Y.; Sun, C. Effect of Climate Variability on Green and Blue Water Resources in a Temperate Monsoon Watershed, Northeastern China. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leiting Lv, Xiaorui Wang, Yuan Jiang, Caizhi Sun. Characterization of spatial and temporal distribution of blue and green water in the Dongjiang River Basin based on SWAT model. Water Resources Conservation 2017, 33, 53–60.
- Richter B D, Davis M M, Ape C, Konradl C. A presumptive stranded for environmental flow protection. River Research and Applications 2012, 28, 1312–1321. [CrossRef]
- Xie P X, Zhuo L., Yang X, Huang H R, Gao X R, Wu P T. Spatial-temporal variations in blue and green water resources, water footprints and water scarcities in a large river basin; a case for the Yellow River Basin. Journal of Hydrology 2020, 500, 125222.
- Rodrigues D B B, Gupta H V, Merdiondo E M. A Blue/Green Water-based Accounting Framework for Assessment of Water Security. Water Resources Research 2014, 50, 7187–7205. [CrossRef]
- Ablaspour к C, Rouholahnejad E., Vaghef S, Srinivasan R, Yang H, Klove B. A continental-scale hydrology and water quality model for Europe: Calibration and uncertainty of a high-resolution large-scale SWAT model. Journal of Hydrology 2015, 524, 733–752. [CrossRef]
- Schuol, J.; Abbaspour, K.C.; Srinivasan, R.; Yang, H. Estimation of freshwater availability in the West African sub-continent using the SWAT hydrologic model. J. Hydrol. 2008, 352, 30–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faramarzi, M.; Abbaspour, K.C.; Schulin, R.; Yang, H. Modelling blue and green water resources availability in Iran. Hydrol. Process. Int. J. 2009, 23, 486–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]










| Data | Explanation | Source |
|---|---|---|
| DEM | 30m spatial resolution | Geospatial Data Cloud (https://www.gscloud.cn/) |
| Land use data | Land cover at 1km resolution in 1980 and 2020 | Center for Resource and Environmental Sciences and Data, Chinese Academy of Sciences(https://www.resdc.cn) |
| Soil data | 1km spatial resolution soil physical and chemical characteristics | HWSD Global Soil Database (v2.0)(http://www.fao.org/nr/land/soils/harmonized-world-soil-database/en/) |
| Meteorological data | Daily precipitation, air temperature, wind speed, relative humidity and solar radiation, 1959-1980 and 2000-2021 | Dataset of daily values of surface climate data in China (V3.0) (http://www.cmads.org./) |
| Hydrological data | Monthly flows at Jiayuguan station and Yuanyangchi (Dam) station, 1959-2021 | Water Resources Bulletin |
| Population data | 1km spatial resolution data, 2002-2021 | Worldp Official Website (https://www.worldpop.org/) |
| Statistical data | Water use (domestic, productive and ecological), production, etc. | Relevant statistical yearbooks and the China Economic and Social Data Platform(https://data.cnki.net/) |
| Indicator Name |
Formula | Performance Evaluation Levels | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Very Good | Good | Satisfied | Unsatisfied | ||
| R2 | 0.75 ~ 1.00 | 0.65 ~ 0.75 | 0.50 ~ 0.65 | 0.00 ~ 0.50 | |
| NSE | 0.75 ~ 1.00 | 0.65 ~ 0.75 | 0.50 ~ 0.65 | 0.00 ~ 050 | |
| PBIAS (%) | < ±10 | ±10 ~ ±15 | ±15 ~ ±25 | > ±25 | |
| Blue Water Assessment Index | Safety | Supply-demand Relationship |
|---|---|---|
| <0.5 | Low | Favorable |
| 0.5~1 | Middle | Balanced |
| 1~1.5 | High | Slight Unbalance |
| >1.5 | Extremely High | Unbalance |
| Mutation test | Yuanyangchi Station | Mutation test | Yuanyangchi Station | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test Value | Significance | Mutation Year | Test Value | Significance | Mutation Year | ||
| Man-Kendall | 1.64 | Yes | 2011 | Sliding rank sum test | 1.96 | Yes | 2009 |
| Cumulative anomaly | 1.64 | Yes | 2009 | Man-Whitney-Pitt | 1.24 | No | 1983 |
| Ordered clustering | 1.64 | Yes | 2009 | Pettitt | 1.96 | Yes | 2006 |
| Lin Haiharin | 1.64 | Yes | 2009 | Buishand U Test | 1.96 | No | 1986 |
| moving t-test | 1.64 | Yes | 2009 | Standard normal state | 0.47 | Yes | 2010 |
| Sliding F-test | 1.64 | Yes | 2013 | Slide at equal intervals of 5T | 0.08 | No | 1984 |
| Sliding run test | 1.96 | No | 2015 | Bayesian | 1.64 | Yes | 2009 |
| Stationary period | 1959-1982 | ||||||
| Mutation period | 1983-2021 | ||||||
| Sensitivity ranking | Method | Parameter | Initial range | Optimal value r | T-Stat | P-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | V | GW_DELAY | 0-500 | 376.286 | 11.76 | <0.01 |
| 2 | V | GWQMN | 0-5000 | 2148.826 | 11.34 | <0.01 |
| 3 | V | GW_REVAP | 0.02-0.2 | 0.108 | 6.39 | <0.01 |
| 4 | V | RCHRG_DP | 0-1 | 0.545 | 3.73 | <0.01 |
| 5 | R | SOL_AWC() | -0.5-0.5 | 0.325 | 3.53 | <0.01 |
| 6 | V | SLSUBBSN | 10-150 | 79.078 | 3.32 | <0.01 |
| 7 | V | HRU_SLP | 0-1 | 0.414 | -2.99 | <0.01 |
| 8 | R | BIOMIX | -0.5-0.5 | -0.058 | -2.34 | 0.02 |
| 9 | R | SOL_Z() | -0.5-0.5 | 0.390 | 2.19 | 0.29 |
| 10 | V | CH_N2 | -0.5-0.5 | 0.123 | -2.06 | 0.04 |
| 11 | V | CANMX | 0-100 | 16.858 | 1.65 | 0.10 |
| 12 | V | REVAPMN | 0-500 | 229.920 | 1.50 | 0.13 |
| 13 | V | SMFMX | 0-20 | 14.399 | 1.27 | 0.21 |
| 14 | V | SMFMN | 0-20 | 4.109 | 1.04 | 0.30 |
| 15 | V | SFTMP | -20-20 | 6.564 | 1.00 | 0.32 |
| 16 | R | SOL_BD() | -0.5-0.5 | -0.440 | -0.97 | 0.33 |
| 17 | V | SMTMP | -20-20 | -17.965 | -0.83 | 0.41 |
| 18 | R | SOL_ALB | -0.5-0.5 | -0.365 | 0.74 | 0.46 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).