Submitted:
03 September 2025
Posted:
05 September 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
- Development of ordinality-aware embedding strategies that model disease progression relationships, rather than treating severity levels as independent categories.
- Adaptation of state-of-the-art diffusion models for medical image synthesis with domain- specific modifications.
- Generation of realistic synthetic longitudinal datasets to unlock new possibilities for image-based UC trajectory analysis.
- Exploration of integration with generative data augmentation techniques to improve deep learning model training using synthetic data.
2. Related Work
2.1. Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Endoscopy
2.2. Evolution of Generative Models and Medical Image Synthesis
2.3. Ordinal Relationships in Medical Image Generation
2.4. Disease Progression Modeling
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Model Architecture
3.2. Dataset and Preprocessing
3.3. Training Protocol
3.4. Evaluation Framework
3.5. Experimental Design
4. Results
4.1. Quantitative Performance Evaluation
4.2. Disease Progression Synthesis Results
4.3. Validation and Consistency Analysis
| Dataset | #Images | RMSE | MAE | Accuracy | QWK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oracle | 1,443 | 0.454 | 0.333 | 0.7651 | 0.8591 |
| CLIP | 27,280 | 0.9507 | 0.7448 | 0.3896 | 0.4625 |
| BOE | 27,280 | 0.5171 | 0.4374 | 0.6239 | 0.8420 |
| AOE | 27,280 | 0.5112 | 0.4238 | 0.6374 | 0.8425 |
4.4. Ablation Studies and Design Validation
5. Discussion
5.1. Educational Impact and Applications
5.2. Technical Contributions and Methodological Advances
5.3. Computer-Aided Diagnosis and Clinical Integration
5.4. Limitations and Methodological Considerations
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| AI | Artificial Intelligence |
| CAD | Computer-aided diagnosis |
| CLIP | Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training |
| CMMD | CLIP Maximum Mean Discrepancy |
| EMA | Exponential Moving Average |
| FID | Fréchet Inception Distance |
| GANs | Generative Adversarial Networks |
| LIMUC | Labeled Images for Ulcerative Colitis |
| MAE | Mean Absolute Error |
| MES | Mayo Endoscopic Score |
| MVG | Medical Video Generation |
| QWK | Quadratic Weighted Kappa |
| RMSE | Root Mean Square Error |
| UC | Ulcerative colitis |
| UMAP | Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection |
| VAE | Variational Autoencoder |
Appendix A
| Dataset | #Images | RMSE | MAE | Accuracy | QWK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oracle | 1,443 | 0.4447 | 0.3010 | 0.7762 | 0.8647 |
| CLIP | 27,280 | 0.9775 | 0.7637 | 0.3781 | 0.4328 |
| BOE | 27,280 | 0.4593 | 0.3683 | 0.6449 | 0.8451 |
| AOE | 27,280 | 0.4494 | 0.3568 | 0.6594 | 0.8490 |
| Dataset | #Images | RMSE | MAE | Accuracy | QWK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oracle | 1,443 | 0.4726 | 0.3360 | 0.7505 | 0.8437 |
| CLIP | 27,280 | 0.9698 | 0.7614 | 0.3723 | 0.4474 |
| BOE | 27,280 | 0.5204 | 0.4259 | 0.6164 | 0.8370 |
| AOE | 27,280 | 0.5086 | 0.4116 | 0.6362 | 0.8431 |
| Dataset | #Images | RMSE | MAE | Accuracy | QWK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oracle | 1,443 | 0.5421 | 0.4058 | 0.7159 | 0.8022 |
| CLIP | 27,280 | 1.2682 | 1.0299 | 0.3011 | 0.3124 |
| BOE | 27,280 | 0.5577 | 0.4567 | 0.5848 | 0.8222 |
| AOE | 27,280 | 0.5508 | 0.4547 | 0.5885 | 0.8146 |
References
- Ochiai, K.; Ozawa, T.; Shibata, J.; Ishihara, S.; Tada, T. Current status of artificial intelligence-based computer-assisted diagnosis systems for gastric cancer in endoscopy. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 3153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Qiu, J.; Saha, A.; Li, L.; Li, P.; He, M.; Guo, Z.; Yuan, W. Artificial intelligence for biomedical video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.07619, arXiv:2411.07619 2024.
- Sun, T.; He, X.; Li, Z. Digital twin in healthcare: Recent updates and challenges. Digital health 2023, 9, 20552076221149651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, J.; Shi, Y.; Yi, C.; Du, H.; Kang, J.; Niyato, D. Generative AI-driven human digital twin in IoT-healthcare: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schulam, P.; Arora, R. Disease trajectory maps. Advances in neural information processing systems 2016, 29. [Google Scholar]
- Lim, B.; van der Schaar, M. Disease-atlas: Navigating disease trajectories using deep learning. In Proceedings of the Machine Learning for Healthcare Conference. PMLR; 2018; pp. 137–160. [Google Scholar]
- Bhagwat, N.; Viviano, J.D.; Voineskos, A.N.; Chakravarty, M.M.; Initiative, A.D.N.; et al. Modeling and prediction of clinical symptom trajectories in Alzheimer’s disease using longitudinal data. PLoS computational biology 2018, 14, e1006376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, X.; Liang, K.; Liao, K.D.; Gao, T.; Ye, W.; Chen, J.; Ding, Z.; Cao, J.; Rehg, J.M.; Sun, J. Medical video generation for disease progression simulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.11943, arXiv:2411.11943 2024.
- Satsangi, J.; Silverberg, M.; Vermeire, S.; Colombel, J. The Montreal classification of inflammatory bowel disease: controversies, consensus, and implications. Gut 2006, 55, 749–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fuerstein, J.; Moss, A.C.; Farraye, F. Ulcerative Colitis. Mayo ClinProc 2019, 94, 1357–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, T.; Zhang, T.; Ding, C.; Dai, X.; Li, Y.; Guo, Z.; Wei, Y.; Gong, J.; Zhu, W.; Li, J. Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) versus Mayo Endoscopic Score (MES) in guiding the need for colectomy in patients with acute severe colitis. Gastroenterology report 2018, 6, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kellermann, L.; Riis, L.B. A close view on histopathological changes in inflammatory bowel disease, a narrative review. Digestive Medicine Research 2021, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jung, E.; Luna, M.; Park, S.H. Conditional GAN with 3D discriminator for MRI generation of Alzheimer’s disease progression. Pattern Recognition 2023, 133, 109061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ravi, D.; Blumberg, S.B.; Ingala, S.; Barkhof, F.; Alexander, D.C.; Oxtoby, N.P.; Initiative, A.D.N.; et al. Degenerative adversarial neuroimage nets for brain scan simulations: Application in ageing and dementia. Medical Image Analysis 2022, 75, 102257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cooke, M.; Irby, D.M.; O’Brien, B.C. Educating physicians: A call for reform of medical school and residency; John Wiley & Sons, 2010.
- Ktena, I.; Wiles, O.; Albuquerque, I.; Rebuffi, S.A.; Tanno, R.; Roy, A.G.; Azizi, S.; Belgrave, D.; Kohli, P.; Cemgil, T.; et al. Generative models improve fairness of medical classifiers under distribution shifts. Nature Medicine 2024, 30, 1166–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kazerouni, A.; Aghdam, E.K.; Heidari, M.; Azad, R.; Fayyaz, M.; Hacihaliloglu, I.; Merhof, D. Diffusion models in medical imaging: A comprehensive survey. Medical image analysis 2023, 88, 102846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Müller-Franzes, G.; Niehues, J.M.; Khader, F.; Arasteh, S.T.; Haarburger, C.; Kuhl, C.; Wang, T.; Han, T.; Nolte, T.; Nebelung, S.; et al. A multimodal comparison of latent denoising diffusion probabilistic models and generative adversarial networks for medical image synthesis. Scientific Reports 2023, 13, 12098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nie, B.; Zhang, G. Ulcerative Severity Estimation Based on Advanced CNN–Transformer Hybrid Models. Applied Sciences 2025, 15, 7484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matsuoka, K.; Kobayashi, T.; Ueno, F.; Matsui, T.; Hirai, F.; Inoue, N.; Kato, J.; Kobayashi, K.; Kobayashi, K.; Koganei, K.; et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for inflammatory bowel disease. Journal of gastroenterology 2018, 53, 305–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kawamoto, A.; Takenaka, K.; Okamoto, R.; Watanabe, M.; Ohtsuka, K. Systematic review of artificial intelligence-based image diagnosis for inflammatory bowel disease. Digestive Endoscopy 2022, 34, 1311–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gong, E.J.; Bang, C.S. Edge Artificial Intelligence Device in Real-Time Endoscopy for the Classification of Colonic Neoplasms. Diagnostics 2025, 15, 1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kingma, D.P.; Welling, M. Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes. arXiv (Cornell University). [CrossRef]
- van den Oord, A.; Kalchbrenner, N.; Kavukcuoglu, K. Pixel Recurrent Neural Networks. arXiv (Cornell University).
- Goodfellow, I.J.; Pouget-Abadie, J.; Mirza, M.; Xu, B.; Warde-Farley, D.; Ozair, S.; Courville, A.; Bengio, Y. Generative adversarial nets. Advances in neural information processing systems 2014, 27, 73–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karras, T.; Laine, S.; Aila, T. A style-based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2019, pp.
- Karras, T.; Laine, S.; Aittala, M.; Hellsten, J.; Lehtinen, J.; Aila, T. Analyzing and improving the image quality of stylegan. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 01 2020, pp. [CrossRef]
- Dhariwal, P.; Nichol, A. Diffusion models beat gans on image synthesis. Advances in neural information processing systems 2021, 34, 8780–8794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Çağlar, Ü.M.; İnci, A.; Hanoğlu, O.; Polat, G.; Temizel, A. Ulcerative Colitis Mayo Endoscopic Scoring Classification with Active Learning and Generative Data Augmentation. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM). IEEE; 2023; pp. 462–467. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Y.; Li, L.; Wang, J.; Yang, X.; Zhou, H.; He, J.; Xie, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Sun, W.; Zhang, X.; et al. Texture-preserving diffusion model for CBCT-to-CT synthesis. Medical Image Analysis 2025, 99, 103362. [Google Scholar]
- Takezaki, S.; Uchida, S. An Ordinal Diffusion Model for Generating Medical Images with Different Severity Levels. 2024 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).
- Li, C.; Liu, H.; Liu, Y.; Feng, B.Y.; Li, W.; Liu, X.; Chen, Z.; Shao, J.; Yuan, Y. Endora: Video generation models as endoscopy simulators. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer; 2024; pp. 230–240. [Google Scholar]
- Gajendran, M.; Loganathan, P.; Jimenez, G.; Catinella, A.P.; Ng, N.; Umapathy, C.; Ziade, N.; Hashash, J.G. A comprehensive review and update on ulcerative colitis. Disease-a-month 2019, 65, 100851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rombach, R.; Blattmann, A.; Lorenz, D.; Esser, P.; Ommer, B. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2022, pp.
- Polat, G.; Kani, H.; Ergenc, I.; Alahdab, Y.; Temizel, A.; Atug, O. Labeled images for ulcerative colitis (limuc) dataset. Accessed March 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Karras, T.; Aittala, M.; Lehtinen, J.; Hellsten, J.; Aila, T.; Laine, S. Analyzing and improving the training dynamics of diffusion models. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024, pp.
- Hang, T.; Gu, S.; Li, C.; Bao, J.; Chen, D.; Hu, H.; Geng, X.; Guo, B. Efficient diffusion training via min-snr weighting strategy. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2023, pp.
- Heusel, M.; Ramsauer, H.; Unterthiner, T.; Nessler, B.; Hochreiter, S. Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium. Advances in neural information processing systems 2017, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jayasumana, S.; Ramalingam, S.; Veit, A.; Glasner, D.; Chakrabarti, A.; Kumar, S. Rethinking fid: Towards a better evaluation metric for image generation. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 01 2024, pp. [CrossRef]
- Kynkäänniemi, T.; Karras, T.; Laine, S.; Lehtinen, J.; Aila, T. Improved precision and recall metric for assessing generative models. Advances in neural information processing systems 2019, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McInnes, L.; Healy, J.; Melville, J. Umap: Uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.03426, arXiv:1802.03426 2018.







| Method | CMMD (↓) | FID (↓) | Precision (↑) | Recall (↑) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLIP | 0.4246 | 30.506 | 0.4942 | 0.5954 |
| BOE | 0.4227 | 36.072 | 0.4616 | 0.6207 |
| AOE | 0.4137 | 34.675 | 0.4614 | 0.6331 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).