Submitted:
29 August 2025
Posted:
02 September 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
1.1. Water Security Challenges and the Need for ICT Integration
1.2. Specific ICT Applications for Sustainable Water Resource Management
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Research Characterization
2.2. Data Collection and Selection
2.3. Data Processing and Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Analysis of Keywords
3.2. Content Analysis of Relevant Articles
4. Discussion
- Raghul & Porchelvan [39] describe a method for determining the concentration of optically active components in the upper layer of a water body, estimating water quality. This study highlights advancements in remote sensing technology, complemented by machine learning techniques to improve the accuracy and temporal applicability of models. However, the authors point out that the models are typically based on in situ data and may not capture long-term trends and variations. This highlights the need for integrating diverse data sources to improve model robustness.
- Matsui et al. [40] proposes a method to estimate the spatial distribution of suspended solids and the nitrogen-phosphorus ratio, important indicators of water quality. The study combines satellite remote sensing data, water depth, and temperature to estimate phytoplankton conditions in water bodies, contributing to a better understanding of aquatic ecology. The proposed method significantly reduced the average error of suspended solids estimation to 4 mg/L. The results highlight the utility of the method in simulating complex water quality conditions, even with recreated data and in scenarios of scarce data. However, the study was unable to specifically identify the phytoplankton species present. This suggests the need for further research to improve the specificity of the models.
- Souza et al. [41] use remote sensing and machine learning to identify turbidity anomalies in the Três Marias reservoir, Brazil. The model was able to accurately identify regions with high turbidity, which is useful for large reservoirs and difficult-to-access regions. For the authors, the model is sensitive to climatic problems where the presence of clouds makes it difficult to capture satellite images, a well-known limitation in the use of images captured by remote sensing, especially orbital. This highlights the challenge of using remote sensing in regions with frequent cloud cover.
- Guo et al. [42] developed and validated Deep Learning models using reflectance data from remote sensing, along with synchronized measurements of water quality, to estimate the concentration of Chlorophyll-a, total phosphorus, and total nitrogen. The study was applied to Lake Simcoe in Canada and demonstrated the ability to make adequate estimates. However, the authors note that the performance of the model depends heavily on the quality and quantity of the data available, and that the lack of validation data from other water bodies may compromise the generalization of the results. This underscores the need for more comprehensive data collection and validation across diverse water bodies.
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| ACMS | Automated Continuous Monitoring System |
| AI | Artificial Intelligence |
| ANA | National Water and Basic Sanitation Agency |
| BARCS | Bacterial Risk Control System |
| BI | Business Intelligence |
| BIM | Building Information Modeling |
| DSS | Decision Support Systems |
| FM | Facility Management |
| ICT | Innovative Information and Communication Technologies |
| IoT | Internet of Things |
| ML | Machine Learning |
| PERH | State Water Resources Plans |
| PNRH | National Water Resources Plan |
| PRISMA | Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses |
| SDG | Sustainable Development Goal |
| WRPs | Water Resources Plans |
References
- Chen, X., Zhao, B., Shuai, C., Qu, S., & Xu, M. (2022). Global spread of water scarcity risk through trade. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 187, 106643. [CrossRef]
- Shemer, H., Wald, S., & Semiat, R. (2023). Challenges and solutions for global water scarcity. Membranes, 13(6), 612. [CrossRef]
- BRASIL. Law Nº 9.433/1997. Institui a Política Nacional de Recursos Hídricos, cria o Sistema Nacional de Gerenciamento de Recursos Hídricos. Diário Oficial da União, 8 de janeiro de 1997. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l9433.htm.
- Johns, C. (2021). Water governance indicators in theory and practice: Applying the OECD’s water governance indicators in the North American Great Lakes region. Water International, 46(7–8), 976–999. [CrossRef]
- Schneider, F., Bonriposi, M., Graefe, O., Herweg, K., Homewood, C., Huss, M., Kauzlaric, M., Liniger, H., Rey, E., Reynard, E., Rist, S., Schädler, B., & Weingartner, R. (2014). Assessing the sustainability of water governance systems: The sustainability wheel. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. [CrossRef]
- Lukhabi, D. K., Mensah, P. K., Asare, N. K., Pulumuka-Kamanga, T., & Ouma, K. O. (2023). Adapted water quality indices: Limitations and potential for water quality monitoring in Africa. Water, 15(9), 1736. [CrossRef]
- Rahu, M. A., Shaikh, M. M., Karim, S., Soomro, S. A., Hussain, D., & Ali, S. M. (2024). Water quality monitoring and assessment for efficient water resource management through Internet of Things and Machine Learning approaches for agricultural irrigation. Water Resources Management, 38, 4987–5028. [CrossRef]
- Kamyab, H., Khademi, T., Chelliapan, S., SaberiKamarposhti, M., Rezania, S., Yusuf, M., Farajnezhad, M., Abbas, M., Jeon, B. H., & Ahn, Y. (2023). The latest innovative avenues for the utilization of artificial intelligence and big data analytics in water resource management. Results in Engineering, 20, 101566. [CrossRef]
- Alfwzan, W. F., Selim, M. M., Almalki, A. S., & Alharbi, I. S. (2024). Water quality assessment using Bi-LSTM and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) techniques. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 97, 346–359. [CrossRef]
- Negri, R.G.; Mendes, J.E.A. Sensoriamento remoto da qualidade da água: princípios e aplicações. Revista Brasileira de Cartografia 2020, 72, 1185–1210. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, L.; et al. A vision of IoT: Applications, challenges, and opportunities with China perspectives. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 2013, 1, 349–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saldanha, B.B.; Barcellos, C.; Pedroso, A.C. Ciência de dados para saúde: um panorama introdutório. Cadernos de Saúde Pública 2021, 37, e00315120. [Google Scholar]
- Cardoso, L.C.; Machado, J.A. Mineração de dados: conceitos, métodos e aplicações. São Paulo: Érica, Brazil, 2008.
- MARIBEL, M.; RAMOS, I. Business intelligence: Uma abordagem conceitual. Revista de Administração de Empresas 2006, 46, 76–87. [Google Scholar]
- Sichman, J.S. Inteligência artificial: o que é, para que serve, onde se aplica. São Paulo: Blucher, Brazil, 2021.
- Ludemir, T.B. Aprendizado de máquina: fundamentos e aplicações. Rio de Janeiro: LTC, Brazil, 2021.
- Paixão, L.F. Machine learning: guia prático com Python. São Paulo: Novatec, Brazil, 2022.
- Ferneda, E. Redes neurais artificiais: fundamentos e aplicações. São Paulo: Atlas, Brazil, 2006.
- Souza, W.M.; Gomes, H.M.; Barroso, R.C.; Miranda, R.M.; Gurgel-Gonçalves, R. Deep learning para classificação de imagens: uma revisão bibliográfica. Revista Brasileira de Computação Aplicada 2020, 12, 70–82. [Google Scholar]
- Clericuzi, E.; Almeida, F.A.; Costa, S.M. Sistemas de apoio à decisão: conceitos e aplicações. São Paulo: Atlas, Brazil, 2006.
- Sausen, J.M. Machine vision para a indústria 4.0. São Paulo: SENAI, Brazil, 2020.
- Botega, L.C.; Cruvinel, P.E. Realidade virtual e realidade aumentada na agricultura de precisão. Engenharia Agrícola 2009, 29, 864–877. [Google Scholar]
- Creswell, J.W.; Clark, V.L.P. Designing and conducting mixed methods of research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, USA, 2015.
- Vanti, N. A. Da bibliometria à webometria: uma exploração conceitual dos mecanismos utilizados para medir o registro da informação e a difusão do conhecimento. Ciência da Informação 2002, 31, 152–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quevedo-Silva, F.; et al. Bibliometria e análise de redes sociais em periódicos científicos da área de administração: um estudo comparativo. Revista de Administração da UFSM 2016, 9, 470–491. [Google Scholar]
- Oliveira, E.G.; et al. Mapeamento da produção científica sobre gestão do conhecimento na área de administração: uma análise bibliométrica. Revista de Administração da UFSM 2010, 3, 224–241. [Google Scholar]
- Fidelis, M.V.; et al. Produção científica brasileira sobre gestão ambiental: uma análise bibliométrica da produção científica. Revista de Administração da UFSM 2009, 2, 242–258. [Google Scholar]
- PRICE, D.J. De S. A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1976, 27, 292–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Urbizagastegui, R. Análise bibliométrica da produção científica sobre bibliotecas digitais. Ciência da Informação 2008, 37, 133–144. [Google Scholar]
- Alvarado, R.U. A bibliometric analysis of the literature on corporate social responsibility: a review of two decades of research. Intangible Capital 2016, 12, 479–521. [Google Scholar]
- Doumas, P.; Papanicolaou, G. Zipf’s law for word frequencies in natural language: A critical review. Journal of Informetrics 2020, 14, 101096. [Google Scholar]
- Waltman, L.; Van Eck, N.J. A smart local moving algorithm for large-scale modularity-based network optimization. European Physical Journal B 2013, 86, 471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C. CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and new paradigms in science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2006, 57, 359–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M. Google Scholar citations and Web of Science: a comparative analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2007, 58, 1055–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2010, 84, 523–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galvão, T.F.; et al. Elaboração de revisão sistemática da literatura. Brasília Med 2015, 52, 128–135. [Google Scholar]
- Moher, D.; et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine 2009, 151, 264–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., & Elmagarmid, A. (2016). Rayyan—A web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 5(1), 1–10.
- Raghul, S.; Porchelvan, P. Water quality assessment using remote sensing and machine learning techniques. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2024, 196, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
- Matsui, T.; et al. Estimation of suspended solids and nitrogen-phosphorus ratio in Lake Biwa using satellite remote sensing. Limnology 2022, 23, 217–227. [Google Scholar]
- Souza, T.O.; et al. Detection of turbidity anomalies in a tropical reservoir using remote sensing and machine learning. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment 2023, 31, 100999. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, Q.; et al. Estimating chlorophyll-a, total phosphorus, and total nitrogen concentrations in Lake Simcoe using remote sensing and deep learning. Remote Sensing of Environment 2021, 264, 112625. [Google Scholar]
- Nguyen, P.T.; et al. Groundwater potential mapping using remote sensing data and deep neural networks: A case study in the North and Central Vietnam. Science of the Total Environment 2024, 906, 167640. [Google Scholar]
- Saha, A.; et al. Modelling and mapping spatial variability of urban groundwater resources integrating remote sensing data, machine learning algorithms and hydrogeological dynamics. Scientific Reports 2024, 14, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, K.; et al. A framework for automated detection of river barriers using satellite imagery. Nature Sustainability 2024, 7, 620–631. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Abadi, A.M.; et al. Drought susceptibility mapping using GRACE/GRACE-FO and GLDAS data with machine learning algorithms: A case study in Iraq. Advances in Space Research 2024, 73, 1151–1169. [Google Scholar]
- Reljić, D.; et al. Application of Automated Continuous Monitoring System for the Assessment of Environmental Parameters in the Neretva River Delta. Water 2023, 15, 3874. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, J.; et al. Pilot study of a water quality management system by combining in situ sensors and model for urban rivers. Journal of Cleaner Production 2023, 419, 138285. [Google Scholar]
- Batista. L., T.; et al. BIM-IoT-FM integration: strategy for implementation of sustainable water management in buildings. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment 2023, 13, 1096–1116. [Google Scholar]
- Jung, Y.; Saynisch-Wagner, J.; Schulz, S. Global scale groundwater recharge data-driven modelling and interpretation. Hydrological Processes 2024, 38, e14992. [Google Scholar]
- Sarkar, S.; et al. Mapping groundwater potential zones in climate variability scenarios using machine learning approaches. Sustainable Water Resources Management 2024, 10, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, C.; et al. Gully erosion susceptibility mapping using hybrid machine learning models: A case study in the Loess Plateau, China. Catena 2022, 218, 106541. [Google Scholar]
- Lu, C.; et al. Predicting Bacterial Risk in Urban Water Distribution Systems Using Machine Learning and Sensors. Environmental Science & Technology 2023, 57, 16576–16586. [Google Scholar]
- Benhmad, F.; et al. Smart irrigation system using Internet of Things and artificial intelligence for efficiency water resource management in Tunisian oases. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 2024, 216, 108530. [Google Scholar]
- Petri, E.; et al. An intelligent support system for real-time management of hydrographic basins and water resources. Environmental Modelling & Software 2018, 109, 81–96. [Google Scholar]



| LABEL | CLUSTER | WEIGHT <LINKS> | WEIGHT <TOTAL LINK STRENGHT> | WEIGHT <OCCURRENCES> |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| machine learning | 6 | 1578 | 6748 | 336 |
| artificial intelligence | 6 | 956 | 2403 | 140 |
| artificial neural network | 6 | 766 | 1843 | 85 |
| computer simulation | 6 | 559 | 905 | 47 |
| decision support system | 2 | 459 | 779 | 38 |
| internet of things | 2 | 223 | 347 | 28 |
| geographic information system | 4 | 485 | 859 | 28 |
| data acquisition | 2 | 295 | 391 | 25 |
| remote sensing | 1 | 379 | 676 | 24 |
| system dynamics | 2 | 201 | 304 | 23 |
| image processing | 1 | 306 | 423 | 21 |
| data mining | 1 | 212 | 258 | 17 |
| big data | 2 | 211 | 271 | 17 |
| cloud computing | 5 | 227 | 356 | 17 |
| image analysis | 1 | 189 | 255 | 13 |
| data analysis | 2 | 335 | 420 | 12 |
| digital technologies | 2 | 133 | 173 | 12 |
| iot | 2 | 87 | 119 | 12 |
| fuzzy systems | 6 | 189 | 287 | 12 |
| fuzzy neural networks | 6 | 152 | 222 | 11 |
| real time systems | 4 | 103 | 132 | 9 |
| intelligent systems | 6 | 154 | 189 | 8 |
| neural network | 6 | 96 | 113 | 8 |
| digital transformation | 2 | 74 | 89 | 7 |
| innovative trends | 1 | 96 | 117 | 6 |
| information and communication technology | 2 | 98 | 120 | 6 |
| virtual reality | 2 | 162 | 214 | 6 |
| deep neural network | 6 | 125 | 145 | 6 |
| Technology | Application | Objective | Citation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Remote Sensing, AI (Machine Learning) | Water Quality | Determine the concentration of optically active components in the upper layer of the water body to estimate water quality, from techniques based on the color spectrum of the water. Integration with machine learning algorithms to improve the model. | (Raghul & Porchelvan, 2024) |
| IoT, Big Data | Monitor water quality, soil salinity, surface water regime and monitoring of climatic conditions with several sensors in real time. | (Reljić et. al, 2023) | |
| DSS, IoT | Improve water quality management in urban environments by offering early warning functions and identification of pollution sources. | (Jiang et al, 2023) | |
| Remote Sensing, AI | Estimate the spatial distribution of suspended solids and the nitrogen-phosphorus ratio as water quality parameters. | (Matsui et al, 2022) | |
| Remote Sensing, AI (Machine Learning) | Integrate remote sensing data and machine learning to detect turbidity anomalies in the Três Marias reservoir, Brazil. The model was able to accurately identify regions with high turbidity, useful for large reservoirs and difficult-to-access regions. | (Souza et al, 2023) | |
| AI (Deep Learning), Remote Sensing | Develop and validate Deep Learning models using reflectance data from remote sensing (Rrs), along with synchronized measurements of water quality, to estimate the concentration of Chlorophyll-a (Chl-a), total phosphorus (TP) and total nitrogen (TN). | (Guo et al, 2021) | |
| AI, IoT | Present the use of AI and sensors to predict the bacterial risk in urban water distribution systems, based on water quality parameters. | (Lu et al, 2023) | |
| Remote Sensing, AI (Deep Neural Networks) | Groundwater | Predict the potential of groundwater from a method based on remote sensing, deep neural networks and optimization algorithms. | (Nguyen et al, 2024) |
| AI | Explore large datasets to understand groundwater recharge mechanisms on a global scale and improve the accuracy of estimates. | (Jung; Saynisch-Wagner & Schulz, 2024) | |
| AI | Map the potential of groundwater in climate variability scenarios. | (Sarkar at al, 2024) | |
| Remote Sensing, AI (Machine Learning) | Model and map the spatial variability of groundwater resources, along with the control dynamics of aquifers in urban and peri-urban areas. | (Saha et al, 2024) | |
| IoT, AI | Surface Water | Present the integration of IoT sensor network and artificial intelligence, to improve the efficiency of water resource utilization. | (Benhmad et al, 2024) |
| AI, IoT | Present an intelligent system for real-time prediction of river level, flow and water precipitation. | (Petri et al, 2018) | |
| Remote Sensing, AI | Propose a new framework for detection of river barriers, capable of identifying different types of infrastructures in rivers from satellite images. | (Sun, et al, 2024) | |
| Remote Sensing, AI (Machine Learning) | Watershed Monitoring | Map drought susceptibility in Iraq, using data from GRACE/GRACE-FO, GLDAS and machine learning algorithms. | (Al-Abadi et al, 2024) |
| AI (Machine Learning) | The study evaluated the relationship between erosion in ravines and environmental factors, using three hybrid machine learning models (FR-RF, FR-SVM and FR-NB) to map susceptibility to erosion. | (Xu et al, 2022) | |
| IoT, DSS | Leak Detection | Present a methodology to automate the sustainable management of water in buildings by integrating the BIM (Building Information Modeling) model, IoT (Internet of Things) devices and facility management (FM) tools. | (Batista et al, 2023) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).