Preprint
Review

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Is TREM2 a Stretch? Implications of TREM2 Along Spinal Cord Circuits in Health, Aging, Injury, and Disease

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

22 August 2025

Posted:

25 August 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract

Triggering Receptor on Myeloid Cells 2 (TREM2) is a receptor found in microglia within the central nervous system (CNS) but also in several other cell types throughout the body. TREM2 has been highlighted as a “double-edged sword” due to its contribution to anti- or pro-inflammatory signaling responses in a spatial, temporal, and disease-specific fashion. Many of the functions of TREM2 in relation to neurological disease have been elucidated in a variety of CNS pathologies that include neurodegenerative, traumatic and vascular injuries and autoimmune diseases. Less is known about the function of TREM2 on motoneurons and sensory neurons whose cell bodies and axons expand between the CNS and peripheral nervous system (PNS) and are exposed to a variety of TREM2 expressing cells and mechanisms. In this review, we provide a brief overview of TREM2 and then highlight literature detailing the involvement of TREM2 along the spinal cord, peripheral nerves and muscles, sensory, motor and autonomic functions in health, aging, disease, and injury. We further discuss the current feasibility of TREM2 as a potential therapeutic target to ameliorate damage in the sensorimotor circuits of spinal cord.

Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

The spinal cord facilitates communication between the central nervous system (CNS) and the rest of the body. The spinal cord contains the central projections of sensory afferents carrying information from the body, and the cell bodies and dendrites of somatic and visceral autonomic motoneurons that respectively regulate motor function in somatic and visceral muscles, by sending axons into the periphery. These neural elements interact with a variety of spinal interneurons that form local circuits that control the transfer of sensory information through the spinal cord to other CNS centers and interpret brain descending commands to exert movement of the skeletomotor system or control visceral organs (e.g., eyes, heart, gastrointestinal motility, bladder function, etc.). Within the spinal cord, some circuits organize reflexes that are rapid, involuntary motor responses to sensory inputs that can occur independently of the brain, although they are also heavily modulated by descending brain projections. Proper function of spinal reflex arcs triggered by nociceptive, mechanoreceptive, proprioceptive, and visceral receptors is key for homeostatic bodily function, movement coordination, and is also protective from damaging stimuli.
Motor Neuron Diseases (MND), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA), peripheral neuropathies, and injuries such as spinal cord injuries and peripheral nerve injuries can have significant detrimental effects on motor, sensory, and proprioceptive functions and all include some degree of neuroinflammation. For example, in ALS, selective but progressive MN degeneration occurs, presenting with activated glia and infiltration of inflammatory T-cells into the CNS, as well as activated monocytes and macrophages in the periphery [1,2,3]. Spinal cord injury causes direct damage to neural circuitry at the lesion zone but can also induce plasticity at lesion remote zones [4]. Immediately following a spinal cord injury, a patient may experience “spinal shock,” during which stretch reflex circuits are suppressed or absent. Following spinal shock, surviving circuitry may result in hyperactivity and ultimately, spasticity [5]. Activation of glia and infiltration of peripheral immune cells occur at the lesion zone, but systemic immune dysfunction has also been observed, leading to secondary injuries [6,7,8]. Peripheral nerve injuries cause direct damage to motor and sensory neurons, leading to axon degeneration, cell death, spinal cord plasticity, permanent loss of the stretch reflex, and neuroinflammation at the site of the injury in the periphery as well as in the spinal cord where the nerves originate [9]. The consequences of neuroinflammation vary from beneficial to detrimental, depending on the disease/injury, the intensity of inflammation, and how long inflammation persists. Generally, the neuroimmune field has pushed for cell-type-specific therapies as an attempt to reduce the amount of pro-inflammatory cells or increase the amount of anti-inflammatory cells in a temporally and spatially specific manner with the ultimate goal of slowing disease progression and/or improving functional recovery following an injury or insult.
One potential target for cell-type-specific modification is Triggering Receptor Expressed in Myeloid Cells 2 (TREM2). TREM2 is found in both CNS and peripheral immune cells. It is regarded as a “double-edged sword,” as knock-out rodent models have yielded beneficial or detrimental results depending on the disease model [10]. In this review, we provide a brief introduction to TREM2, followed by an examination of its potential implications in health, disease, and injury states, utilizing the spinal cord and peripheral nervous system (PNS) anatomy as a roadmap for discussing TREM2 involvement in sensory and motor neuropathologies involving the spinal cord specifically (summarized in Figure 1).
Figure 1. Graphical abstract summarizing the implications of TREM2 along spinal reflex circuitry.
Figure 1. Graphical abstract summarizing the implications of TREM2 along spinal reflex circuitry.
Preprints 173574 g001

2. Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cells 2 (TREM2)

2.1. What and Where is TREM2?

TREM2 belongs to a family of transmembrane glycoprotein cell-surface receptors expressed by immune cells, including microglia. The TREM family has been extensively reviewed previously [11,12]. Here we provide a brief introduction to TREM2 specifically. The functional TREM2 protein comprises an extracellular N’-terminal receptor (IgV) domain, tethered to the transmembrane domain via a stalk, and a C’-terminal cytoplasmic domain [11,13]. TREM2 lacks a signaling motif and requires an adapter protein, such as DNAX-activating protein of 12kDa or 10kDa (DAP12 or DAP10), encoded by Tyrobp or Hcst, respectively, to initiate a signaling cascade [14]. The TREM2 gene is located on chromosome 6 (6p21.1) in humans and chromosome 17C in mice and is evolutionarily conserved [11,12,15,16,17,18]. In humans, TREM2 has five exons with six alternative splice transcripts [19,20]. The full-length human TREM2 variant which functions as a transmembrane receptor, results in 230 amino acids (227aa in mouse), whereby amino acids (aa) 1-18 is the signaling peptide, 19- 134aa is the extracellular receptor domain, 175- 195aa is the transmembrane domain, and 196- 230aa is the intracellular domain [13,21,22,23]. TREM2 is expressed by microglia in the CNS; Schwann cells and resident macrophages in the PNS [24]; Kupffer cells, hepatic stellate cells, and sinusoidal endothelial cells in the liver; splenic macrophages in the spleen; alveolar macrophages in the lungs; osteoclasts in bone; dendritic cells and monocyte-derived macrophages (e.g., Lipid Associated Macrophages in adipose, and resident muscle macrophages) throughout the body (extensively reviewed previously [11,20,25,26,27]) (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Cells that express TREM2 throughout the body.
Figure 2. Cells that express TREM2 throughout the body.
Preprints 173574 g002

2.2. TREM2 Ligands and Signaling Cascade

Numerous reviews have summarized TREM2 signaling cascades, predominantly in microglia but also in osteoclasts, Schwann cells, and peripheral macrophages. Generally, the TREM2 signaling cascade is conserved between cell types, although slight nuances may exist, primarily due to differing ligands that cell types may be exposed to. Below, we provide a comprehensive, up-to-date depiction of the TREM2 signaling cascade surmised from the following reviews and research articles [9,11,13,20,21,23,24,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40] (Figure 3).
Several ligands– including but not limited to phospholipids (e.g., phosphatidylserine)[41,42,43,44], sulfatides, lipoproteins (e.g., Apolipoprotein E, APOE) [45,46,47], nucleic acids [48], Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) [49], mycobacteria [50], amyloid-β [41,51], and TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) [52,53] bind TREM2 with high or low affinity. High avidity ligands that bind TREM2 with full affinity result in the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM) portion of DAP12 being phosphorylated by Src family kinases [14,54]. Phosphorylated DAP12 can then allow docking and activation of Spleen Tyrosine Kinase (SYK), which robustly propagates multiple signaling cascades, including those for phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), Proline-rich Tyrosine Kinase 2 (PYK2), Phospholipase γ (PLCγ), Vav Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor 2 and 3 (VAV2/3), Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) and Nuclear Factor- Kappa B (NF- ϰB), ultimately leading to increased cell survival, cytoskeletal rearrangement, proliferation, phagocytosis, and release of inflammatory chemokines [9,11,20,21,23,24,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40] (Figure 3). Low-avidity ligands that bind TREM2 with partial affinity result in activation of SH2-containing inositol 5’-phosphatase-1 (SHIP1), which inhibits SYK and downstream signaling cascades [11,14,39]. TREM2 signaling can also be modulated by other receptors, such as Colony Stimulating Factor 1 Receptor (CSF1-R), that bind ligands CSF1 and Interleukin-34 (IL-34). Upon activation, CSF1-R phosphorylates SRC [55] to activate PI3K/ERK signaling cascades, leading to cell proliferation and increased transcription of several downstream signaling molecules, including Tyrobp (DAP12) [9,56,57,58,59,60]. In addition to transcriptional changes, CSF1-R and TREM2 are frequently found close to each other and can interact either through DAP12-SRC signaling or physically by their transmembrane domains [38,43,59] (Figure 3). DAP12 and SYK are utilized in numerous other signaling cascades not discussed here that increase the complexity of immune cell signaling. Collectively, the literature suggests that TREM2 is just one modulatory receptor in a complex web that varies depending on cell type and microenvironment.
Figure 3. TREM2 Signaling Cascade.
Figure 3. TREM2 Signaling Cascade.
Preprints 173574 g003
Colony Stimulating Factor 1 (CSF1), Interleukin-34 (IL-34), Colony Stimulating Factor 1 Receptor (CSF1-R), Src Family Kinases (SRC), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), Extracellular signal Regulated Kinase (ERK), Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cells 2 (TREM2), DNAX activation protein of 12kDa (DAP12), DNAX activation protein of 10kDa (DAP10), SYK (Spleen Tyrosine Kinase), phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2), phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate (PIP3), mammalian target Of Rapamycin Complex 2 (mTORC2), Phospholipase γ1 (PLC-γ1), diacylglycerol (DAG), inositol trisphosphate (IP3), Protein Kinase C (PKC), inositol trisphosphate receptor (IP3R), Calcium (Ca2+), Protein Kinase B (AKT), Tuberous Sclerosis Complex-1 and -2 (TSC1/2), Ras homolog enriched in brain (Rheb), mammalian target Of Rapamycin Complex 1 (mTORC1), Hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (Hif-1α), Proline-rich Tyrosine Kinase 2 (PYK2), T-cell factor (TCF), Lymphoid Enhancer-binding Factor (LEF), Phospholipase γ (PLC-γ), Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK), Vav Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor 2 and 3 (VAV2/3), Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 (Rac1), Cell division control protein 42 homolog (CDC42), actin-related protein 2/3 (Arp2/3), Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK), Nuclear Factor- ϰB (NF- ϰB), Interleukin-1β (IL-1β), soluble TREM2 (sTREM2), A Disintegrin and Metalloprotease 10 (ADAM10), A Disintegrin and Metalloprotease 17 (ADAM17), SH2-containing inositol 5’-phosphatase-1 (SHIP1).

2.3. sTREM2

Soluble TREM2 (sTREM2) is a truncated TREM2 variant comprising the receptor domain and a fragment of the stalk [13]. The sTREM2 protein variant can result either from cleavage of the full-length TREM2 or secretion of alternative splice variants [13,22,61]. A Distintegrin and Metalloprotease 10 and/or 17 (ADAM10 and/or ADAM17) have been shown to cleave full-length TREM2 at the H157-S158 bond in the stalk, which allows shedding of the ectodomain, sTREM, into the microenvironment [11,13,22,23,61,62,63,64] (Figure 3). The remaining transmembrane domain can be further cleaved by γ-secretase, releasing the intracellular domain for proteolysis [22,63]. Two alternative splice isoforms of TREM2, which lack the transmembrane domain, can also be translated into sTREM2, which is subsequently released extracellularly [19,65,66,67]. Once released by either mechanism, sTREM2 can be detected in the extracellular space, cerebrospinal fluid, and serum [11,13,68,69]. sTREM2 has been extensively studied in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but has also been found in other motor/spinal neuropathologies such as ALS, and following spinal cord injury [69]. Although the exact mechanisms and function of sTREM2 remain to be fully elucidated, it has been found to function independently from TREM2 by 1) interacting with neighboring cells in a non-cell autonomous manner, 2) autocrine signaling, and 3) scavenging excess TREM2 ligands [11,13,48,62,65,70,71,72]. In AD, sTREM2 is theorized to perpetuate neuroinflammation, promote immune cell survival, and increase phagocytosis of protein aggregates, debris, and damaged neurons, as the level of sTREM2 in cerebrospinal fluid and serum correlates with disease progression [39,73,74,75]. Alternatively, sTREM2 may be useful as a biomarker for neurodegeneration following injury or disease. Individuals with ALS have been shown to have elevated TREM2 protein in the spinal cord, and significantly greater sTREM2 in cerebrospinal fluid and serum compared to healthy controls [69,76]. Further, the level of cerebrospinal fluid sTREM2 has been shown to predict patient survival duration [77]. In spinal cord injury, elevated cerebrospinal fluid sTREM2 has also been identified and correlates with neurodegeneration markers (e.g., neurofilament light chain) within the first two months post-injury, suggesting sTREM2 may be a biomarker for injury severity [78].

2.4. TREM2/DAP12 Mutations in Disease

Some TREM2 mutations have been identified that alter function and can be either disease-causing or risk factors for certain diseases. Polycystic Lipomembranous Osteodysplasia with Sclerosing Leukoencephalopathy (PLOSL), also known as Nasu-Hakola disease, is caused by recessive inheritance of homozygous loss-of-function mutations of TREM2 or DAP12 [79,80,81]. This disease is characterized by cysts developing on the bones as well as a characteristic presenile dementia, similar in progression to Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD) [81]. However, loss-of-function TREM2 mutations can also cause FTD-like dementias without the presence of bone cysts [82]. While the link of Nasu-Hakola disease to TREM2/DAP12 signaling is well established, the exact disease mechanisms have yet to be elucidated due to the inability of mouse models to recapitulate the disease.
The role of TREM2 variants in other disease models is less clear and frequently highly debated. The R47H TREM2 mutation substitutes an arginine for a histidine near the ligand-binding site and was discovered to be a risk factor for developing AD [82,83]. This discovery was the first to directly connect TREM2 dysfunction to AD development later in life. TREM2’s role in AD has been studied and described in depth by many groups [82,83,84,85,86,87]. Briefly, the connection between TREM2 function and AD is supported by showing that Trem2 gene deletions increase Tau interneuronal dispersion [84], decrease amyloid-β plaque clearing [88], and worsen disease prognosis in mouse models. Similarly, the R47H variant has reduced affinity for amyloid-β, and this variant may hasten AD progression due to an increased affinity for externalized phosphatidylserine (ePtdSer), an “eat me” signal that can prompt synapse removal and worsen neurodegeneration [85].
Further studies extended the role of the R47H mutation to other neurodegenerative disorders, including PD [89]. However, when this mutation was investigated in the spinal cord as a potential risk factor for ALS, the results varied. Some studies proposed the R47H mutation as a risk factor in sporadic ALS [90]. However, other groups found no significant relationship in human patient populations between this genetic mutation and sporadic ALS [86]. Other TREM2 mutations have been studied regarding ALS as well as FTD; their potential as risk factors is also debated [86,91]. Nevertheless, some homozygous and compound heterozygous mutations in exon 2 can be causative for FTD [91].

2.5. Different Mouse Models May Contribute to Conflicting TREM2 Results

One problem is that TREM2’s functional complexity throughout development and after disease onset may induce confounding effects. The most used Global TREM2 Knockout (GKO) mouse model has a 175bp deletion and introduces an early stop codon after bp17, leaving no functional protein isoform (Jax #027197) [92]. The benefit of this model is a complete absence of TREM2 signaling. However, TREM2’s actions during normal developmental synaptic pruning introduce confounds when studies look at aberrant circuitry caused by injury or disease [93]. Moreover, these results could be region-specific [94,95,96], and the unknown action in other brain cells and the peripheral immune system can introduce pleiotropic effects that are difficult to control. Further, TREM2 GKO can lead to conflicting conclusions depending on the neurodegenerative mouse model. For example, Lyens et al. (2017) found that in a pure tauopathy model of AD, Trem2 knockout was beneficial and neuroprotective [97]. Two years later, the same group in Lyens et al. (2019) found Trem2 knockout and the R47H variant to be detrimental in an APPPS1-21 mouse model of AD [98]. This highlights the importance of the nuances of TREM2 signaling in various mouse models of disease.
In contrast, conditional TREM2 Knockout (cKO) models have the benefit of being cell-type specific and potentially temporally controlled. This model usually involves a floxed mouse model that removes exons 2 and 3 from Trem2 after recombination (Jax #029853) [99]. However, there are some studies suggesting that a Trem2 variant can still be generated without these exons [100]. The extent of signaling that can occur without the presence of exon 2, where the ligand binding domain is located, has yet to be fully characterized; however, this TREM2 isoform variant could still fold and localize normally even without exons 2 and 3 [100].

3. The Dorsal Root Ganglion

3.1. Anatomical Overview of the Dorsal Root Ganglion

The Dorsal Root Ganglion (DRG) is a complex structure situated bilaterally within the dural sheath, within the vertebral foramina, outside of the spinal cord [101]. As an enlargement of the dorsal root, a single DRG houses the cell bodies of pseudo-unipolar sensory neurons, ranging from 15,000 neurons in rats to 70,000 in humans, with variability depending on the spinal segment [102,103,104,105]. The bifurcating axons of DRG neurons extend peripherally to innervate sensory receptors or end freely in skin, muscle, and viscera, whereas the central branches enter the spinal cord, allowing information from the periphery to reach the CNS. Given the peculiar anatomy, DRG sensory neurons and their axons interact with many different cell types and tissues, which include myelinating or non-myelinating Schwann cells in peripheral nerves and oligodendrocytes centrally, whereas the cell body is surrounded by satellite glial cells. In addition, fibroblasts, pericytes, mast cells, endothelial cells, resident macrophages, and monocyte-derived macrophages can also be found among the connective tissue within the DRG and in peripheral nerves, while microglia interact with the central branches of sensory axons [106]. Following injury or in diseases such as diabetic neuropathy, communication from the periphery to the CNS is compromised [107,108]. Therefore, identifying mechanisms that can preserve, prevent, or prolong detriments is crucial for improving patient prognosis in injury and disease. In the following section, we will discuss the current knowledge of TREM2 in the DRG.

3.2. TREM2 in the Dorsal Root Ganglion

Although numerous RNA sequencing studies have found macrophages with high levels of Trem2 and Tyrobp expression in the DRG following injury or in diseased states, the exact role of these TREM2/DAP12+ cells is currently unknown [107,109,110,111]. Some literature suggests that macrophages in the DRG are specifically involved in the initiation and maintenance of mechanical hypersensitivity following peripheral nerve injury, as DRG macrophage depletion prevents and/or stops neuropathic pain [112]. In 2023, Feng et al. identified four different populations of macrophages in the DRG following peripheral nerve injury: 1) bone-marrow-derived precursor cells, 2) self-renewing macrophages, 3) microglia-like macrophages, and 4) satellite glial cell-like macrophages [113]. The potential differential expression and signaling of TREM2 in different DRG macrophage subpopulations remains to be elucidated. Research on the role of TREM2 in other diseases and injuries suggests that TREM2+ DRG macrophages may regulate the local cytokine response (either pro- or anti-inflammatory) and influence the metabolic processes of neighboring cells; however, TREM2 in the DRG is currently understudied (Figure 1).

4. TREM2 in the Spinal Cord

4.1. Anatomical Overview of the Spinal Cord

The spinal cord is a complex CNS region that contains circuits that can act independently from the brain or transmit sensory, motor, or autonomic signals between the brain and peripheral targets. The spinal cord can be divided into five regions, each with different segments that innervate different regions of the body via bilateral peripheral spinal nerve pairs. Humans have 31 segments: cervical (C1-C8), thoracic (T1-T12), lumbar (L1-L5), sacral (S1-S5), and one coccygeal; these vary slightly in different species (mouse: 8 cervical, 13 thoracic, 6 lumbar, 4 sacral, and 3 coccygeal). Spinal cord segments contain specific circuitry that controls different body regions and functions. For example, all segments are capable of transmitting sensory information from cutaneous organs informing about touch (mechanoreceptors) or pain (nociception) or from muscles and joints (proprioception). All segments contain somatic motor neurons whose outputs control muscle contractions in the corresponding segments. Similarly, all segments have circuitry to evoke nociceptive flexion reflexes (i.e., withdrawal reflex) and proprioceptive reflexes (i.e., stretch reflex). Other circuits and functions are more specific to certain segments. The cervical and upper thoracic spinal cord contains circuitry for tectospinal reflexes coordinating eye and neck muscles, as well as respiratory reflexes that control diaphragm and intercostal muscles. Thoracic and upper lumbar regions contain circuitry that controls the autonomic sympathetic system and encodes visceral reflexes for cardiovascular control. The sacral and coccygeal regions predominantly contain reflexive circuitry for the pelvic area, including urination, defecation, and reproductive organs controlled by specialized somatic motor neurons and autonomic parasympathetic neurons [114,115,116,117,118,119]. Disease or injury may affect differentially specific spinal cord segments, causing a plethora of different combinations of sensory, motor, or visceral dysfunction and symptoms.
Although functional and cellular differences exist between spinal segments, all have the same general anatomy. The central projection of sensory neuron afferents enters the dorsal horn of the spinal cord through the dorsal root. Nociceptive sensory neurons terminate on interneurons in lamina I-II; mechanoreceptive sensory neurons terminate on interneurons in lamina III-V; and proprioceptive sensory neurons terminate either on interneurons in lamina V or on motoneurons in lamina IX. Motoneuron cell bodies are located in the ventral horn, and their axons exit through the ventral root [114] (Figure 4). Sensorimotor integration function in the spinal cord occurs through reflex circuits that commonly experience plasticity during development, aging, disease, and after injury. The removal of synapses or damaged neurons during aging, disease, and injury is frequently attributed to microglia. Microglia are the primary spinal cord cells that contain TREM2; however, in diseased or injured states, TREM2+ peripheral macrophages may enter the spinal cord as well. In this section, we will discuss the role of TREM2 in microglia function broadly, followed by the implications of TREM2 in the dorsal and ventral horns, and following spinal cord injury.
Figure 4. Simplified illustration of spinal reflex circuitry. Figure illustrates the different types of sensory neurons and where they terminate within a lumbar spinal cord segment. Nociceptors (red) terminate on interneurons (not shown) in lamina I-II, mechanoreceptors (purple) terminate on interneurons (not shown) in lamina III-IV, and proprioceptors (pink) terminate on interneurons in lamina V (light blue) and motoneurons in lamina IX (dark blue). Microglia (green), the spinal cord’s resident immune cell, are predominantly responsible for synapse and neuron removal in healthy development, aging, disease, and injury and express TREM2.
Figure 4. Simplified illustration of spinal reflex circuitry. Figure illustrates the different types of sensory neurons and where they terminate within a lumbar spinal cord segment. Nociceptors (red) terminate on interneurons (not shown) in lamina I-II, mechanoreceptors (purple) terminate on interneurons (not shown) in lamina III-IV, and proprioceptors (pink) terminate on interneurons in lamina V (light blue) and motoneurons in lamina IX (dark blue). Microglia (green), the spinal cord’s resident immune cell, are predominantly responsible for synapse and neuron removal in healthy development, aging, disease, and injury and express TREM2.
Preprints 173574 g004

5. TREM2 in Microglia

5.1. Disease-Associated Microglia

High TREM2 expression is frequently associated with a subtype of activated microglia known as Disease-Associated Microglia (DAM). Morphologically, DAM typically have enlarged cell bodies and reduced processes, resulting in an ameboid appearance compared to ramified surveying microglia in healthy tissue [120,121,122,123]. DAM were first characterized in AD mouse models and human post-mortem tissue as they are found around amyloid-β plaques and in proximity to apoptotic neurons; however, DAM have also been found in ALS, PD, peripheral nerve injury, spinal cord injury, and aging rodent models [123,124,125,126,127]. Through RNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry in various neuropathologies, DAM have been characterized by elevated expression of Trem2, Tyrobp, Apoe, Lpl (Lipoprotein Lipase), and Ctsd (Cathepsin D), cumulatively deeming their typical function as pro-inflammatory, lipid metabolizing, and highly phagocytic activated microglia cells [125,126,127,128,129,130,131]. The formation of DAM from surveying microglia has been generally accepted to be a two-stage process, whereby Stage 1 is TREM2-independent, and Stage 2 is TREM2-dependent. Stage 1 involves the downregulation of homeostatic genes (e.g., Cx3cr1 and Tmem119) as well as the upregulation of Trem2, Tyrobp, and Apoe. TREM2-dependent Stage 2 results in expression changes of genes involved in phagocytosis and lipid metabolism (e.g., Lpl and Ctsd) [125,126,128,129]. Research suggests the increase in APOE expression helps sustain TREM2 activation in an autocrine/paracrine loop fashion [132]. Further, as discussed above, TREM2 activity results in pro-proliferative and pro-survival signaling cascades, which maintain microgliosis in diseased or injured states [129]. Genetic TREM2 knockout or xenotransplanted human knockout microglia in AD mouse models (5XFAD), and TREM2 knockout in ALS mouse models (SOD1) all result in fewer DAM [87,127,133]. Further, knockout of SYK, a downstream target of activated TREM2, also results in reduced phagocytosis and DAM formation [134]. In contrast, we recently reported that microglial TREM2 knockout mice still develop what appear to be DAM following peripheral nerve injury, although their microglial function is compromised [123]. Collectively, this highlights 1) the necessity to investigate microglial TREM2 in additional disease and injury models, 2) TREM2 function is variable depending on each cell’s microenvironment, and 3) DAM formation may occur through compensatory pathways activated in certain disease or injury states.

5.2. Synaptic Plasticity

TREM2 has also been shown to be involved in synaptic plasticity; however, its exact role in synapse removal is complex [135]. Filipello et al. (2018) demonstrated that TREM2 is required for the canonical synaptic pruning during developmental circuit and behavior refinement. Juvenile TREM2 knockout mice result in increased cortical synaptic density, excess excitatory neurotransmission, reduced functional brain connectivity, and ultimately, social behavior deficits [93]. However, the lack of synaptic pruning may contribute to reduced synaptic stabilization, as adult TREM2 knockout mice had reduced, instead of larger, synaptic density [93]. In agreement, Jay et al. (2019) found that TREM2 knockout resulted in decreased synaptic density in one-month-old mice; however, they mechanistically proposed that microglia TREM2 limits astrocytic synapse engulfment during development [136]. Intriguingly, post-mortem cortex from five to 23-year-old idiopathic autistic humans had reduced TREM2 compared to control tissue, and TREM2 levels inversely correlated with the individuals’ Autism Diagnosis Interview-Revised (ADI-R) score, suggesting microglial TREM2 is necessary for normal canonical neuronal circuit development [93]. Recently, Vecchiarelli et al. (2024) published evidence that a particular TREM2-dependent microglia phenotype that is frequently missed by immunohistochemistry, “Dark Microglia,” arises at crucial developmental periods, whereby the Dark microglia perform endocytosis and trogocytosis for synaptic and vascular remodeling [137,138]. Additional studies reveal further complexities of TREM2 involvement with synaptic plasticity.
During development, microglia often utilize C1q and the complement cascade to prune synapses selectively [139,140,141]. The signal to initiate complement-mediated synapse pruning was proposed to be initiated by TREM2 recognition of externalized phosphatidylserine (ePtdSer) at synaptic sites [142]. PtdSer is normally located on the inner leaflet of the lipid bilayer, but in disease and injury states, PtdSer can be externalized. ePtdSer is a known “eat me” signal and high-affinity ligand of TREM2 [42]. Nevertheless, a built-in TREM2 feedback mechanism also seems to be at play, negatively modulating synapse pruning. In AD rodent models, amyloid-β and tau also result in increased C1q, complement pathway activation, and synapse elimination [143,144,145]. Zhong et al. (2023) found microglial TREM2 binds C1q with high affinity in 5xFAD mice and postmortem human AD cortex to minimize complement-mediated synaptic loss. Thus, TREM2 knockout resulted in accelerated synapse elimination, suggesting that TREM2 prevents synapse loss in AD [146]. However, Rueda-Carrasco et al. (2023) provided evidence that in the early stage of an AD mouse (hAPP NF-L knock-in mouse), hyperactive synapses display ePtdSer and are preferentially removed by microglia via TREM2. The authors conclude that TREM2 is beneficial, by selectively removing inefficient synapses, not because of synapse preservation [147]. A similar conclusion was reached by Fracassi et al. (2023) in that non-demented individuals with AD neuropathology are protected by higher-than-normal TREM2 activity detecting ePtdSer in dysfunctional synapses, triggering their removal by microglia [148]. The discrepancy between these various studies may be explained by the use of different mouse models and analyses at different disease stages, but all highlight that TREM2 has complex activities in synaptic plasticity by interfering with multiple mechanisms of synapse deletion/preservation. Dejanovic et al. (2022) highlight differential effects of TREM2 on microglia versus astrocytic engulfment of inhibitory versus excitatory synapses in various models of AD, creating synaptic imbalances affecting network function [149]. Moreover, TREM2 actions on synapses might be regionally dependent. TREM2-R47H variant results in increases of synapses in the cortex but not in the hippocampal regions [150]. Thus, synapse deletion might occur through a multiplicity of mechanisms in different disease states, synapses, and regions, with TREM2 affecting their balance and having differential effects, sometimes beneficial and others detrimental. The role of TREM2 in spinal cord synaptic plasticity in disease or following an injury has been much less studied. Brennan et al. (2024) recently reported specific deletion of inhibitory synapses controlling sympathetic outflow by a TREM2 microglia mechanism after spinal cord injury, contributing to autonomic dysreflexia [151].

5.3. Neuronal Bioenergetic Support

Microglia have been shown to routinely monitor and therefore rapidly respond to neuronal mitochondrial states in health and following injury via specialized microglial P2RY12-neuronal KV2.1 junctions [152]. However, literature also suggests alternative microglial receptors may influence microglia’s aid in neuronal bioenergetic support. In 2019, Tagliatti et al. provided novel evidence that microglial TREM2 is necessary for hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neuron bioenergetics. In this study, TREM2 knockout postnatal day 1 (p1) mice resulted in reduced hippocampal basal mitochondrial metabolism. Excitatory pyramidal and granular cells specifically resulted in altered gene expression for mTOR and mitochondrial pathways (including mitochondrial machinery and oxidative phosphorylation components) and delayed maturation compared to wild-type TREM2 littermates. Further, as expected, TREM2 knockout resulted in altered synaptic pruning. Intriguingly, the effect of TREM2 knockout was not universal, as neither CA3 excitatory neurons nor inhibitory neurons were significantly affected. CA1 was also found to have significantly higher amounts of TREM2 than CA3 in wildtype mice. This work suggests that some neuronal subpopulations or neurons in certain states may be more dependent on microglial TREM2 than others, and that microglial TREM2 is necessary for normal developing neurons’ mitochondrial metabolism [94]. Currently, it is largely unknown how microglial TREM2 affects neuronal bioenergetics in spinal neurons or motoneurons during disease or after injury, where there is a high metabolic demand for survival. Our studies have suggested that in the absence of microglia TREM2 there is a dysregulation in motoneurons of the normal cell body reaction to axotomy and in preparation to switching towards a regenerative metabolism (see below).

6. TREM2 In the Dorsal Horn

6.1. Neuropathic Pain

Physiological pain is crucial for detecting and responding to noxious stimuli. As discussed above, the flexion withdrawal reflex depends on cutaneous nociceptors to detect painful stimuli and rapidly withdraw that part of the body from a potentially damaging stimulus. However, if pain persists post-healing or during disease, it becomes pathological. Identifying mechanisms to remedy pain sensation without compromising healing is essential for therapeutic advancement. In this section, we will discuss TREM2’s involvement in microglia function in various neuropathic pain conditions.
Following a peripheral nerve injury, neuropathic pain frequently persists in addition to permanent motor and proprioceptive deficits[123]. It is generally accepted that dorsal horn microglia contribute to plasticity, which facilitates prolonged hypersensitivity following peripheral nerve injury [153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166]. We have previously reviewed the mechanisms of microglia activation and general hypotheses behind microgliosis around the central branches of sensory afferents injured in the peripheral nerve, and therefore, will not be discussing them in detail here [9]. Given that microglia contribute to neuropathic pain, identifying mechanisms that alter microgliosis may provide options as therapeutic targets. Microglial TREM2 has increasingly been investigated as a mechanism of microglia-induced allodynia following peripheral nerve injury.
Numerous studies in rodent models have reported an increase in dorsal horn microglial TREM2 and DAP12 expression and phosphorylation following peripheral nerve injury [59,167,168,169]. In 2016, two publications provided evidence that either TREM2 or DAP12 deficiency can reduce allodynia following peripheral nerve injury. Guan et al. (2016) provided RNA sequencing evidence of increased dorsal horn Tyrobp (DAP12) expression as early as one day post sciatic nerve cut-ligation. In rats, animals that performed pain-induced self-mutilation of the injured limb (autotomy) had higher DAP12 expression than littermates with no evidence of autotomy, suggesting allodynia may be mediated by DAP12 signaling. This was confirmed as DAP12-deficient mice had reduced allodynia, evident by increased mechanical thresholds for pain [59]. Later that year, Kobayashi et al. (2016) confirmed these findings and showed that following an L4 nerve injury, dorsal horn microglia increase TREM2 and DAP12 expression and activity, evident by increased DAP12 phosphorylation. The increase in TREM2/DAP12 activity resulted in an increased production of proinflammatory cytokines and purinergic receptors (TNFα, IL-1β, IL-6, P2RX4), ultimately leading to increased pain post-injury. Again, DAP12-deficient mice exhibited decreased inflammation and allodynia with improved recovery time. Perhaps the most convincing of direct TREM2 involvement in the regulation of sensory nociceptive thresholds was the intrathecal injection of a TREM2 agonist-induced allodynia via DAP12 activity [167]. Tansley et al. (2022) further elucidated the role of TREM2-mediated allodynia in a spared nerve injury rat model. Intrathecal injection of TREM2 lentivirus or an autophagy inhibitor (3-MA) both led to increased mechanical allodynia. Suggesting a TREM2-autophagy pathway which modulates microglia function and neuroinflammation following peripheral nerve injury [168]. The expansion of the RNA sequencing literature has supported the notion of dorsal horn microglial heterogeneity. Recently, a specific cluster of microglia, identified as Cd11c+, was found to appear following peripheral nerve injury and deemed necessary for spontaneous allodynia recovery, as CD11c+ microglia depletion relapsed injury-induced pain sensitivity. This subpopulation of microglia was theorized to appear upon myelin consumption from damaged primary afferents. Intriguingly, mice with TREM2 deficiency have impaired appearance of CD11c+ microglia [170,171]. In AD rodent models, CD11c was found to be another marker of DAM [125,172]. Based on this, it is suggested that the identified CD11c+ microglia, which appear following myelin consumption in the dorsal horn, are TREM2-dependent DAM that contribute to allodynia post-peripheral nerve injury. Collectively, this cumulative evidence in the literature suggests that peripheral nerve injury increases microglial TREM2 signaling, thus contributing to neuropathic pain states and a decrease in sensory thresholds to cutaneous stimuli.
TREM2 activity’s influence on microglia function may be more specific to females. In a recent study using a mouse sciatic nerve chronic constriction injury model, ipsilateral spinal microglia RNA sequencing data were submitted to QIAGEN’s Ingenuity Pathway Analysis to help identify the physiological function and upstream regulators of transcriptional changes between males and females seven days post-injury. Identified male microglia upstream regulators included activation of Interferon Regulatory Factor 3 and 7 (IRF3/IRF7), whereas female microglia included activation of TREM2 and Interferon-γ. The authors suggested sexual dimorphisms in microglial transcriptional signatures, which may contribute to differences in pain-processing and thresholds post-peripheral nerve injury [173]. Recently, we showed evidence suggesting that ventral horn DAM-like microglia in females have elevated TREM2 compared to males, with sex-specific TREM2 knock-out effects, supporting the notion that female microglia may utilize TREM2 activity more than males [123].
Neuropathic pain is also frequently a co-morbidity of other pathologies, such as diabetic neuropathy. Type I diabetes mellitus can be modeled in rodents via intraperitoneal administration of Streptozotocin (STZ), and results in painful diabetic neuropathy, evident by spinal cord neuroinflammation, axon degeneration, and reduced mechanical withdrawal and thermal withdrawal thresholds. Chen et al. (2021) identified a marked increase in TREM2 and DAP12 expression between one and two weeks post-Streptozotocin injection. Over-expression of TREM2 via intrathecal infusion of a microglia-specific lentivirus resulted in increased microglial number, CD68 (indicating increased phagocytosis), increased production of pro-inflammatory IL-1β, and reduced expression of anti-inflammatory TGF-β and IL-10. Blocking TREM2 activity via an intrathecal injection of TREM2-neutralizing antibody resulted in the opposite effects [174]. This work supports the theory that dorsal horn TREM2 activity contributes to neuroinflammation-mediated chronic pain in diabetic neuropathy models, similar to post-peripheral nerve injury and neurodegenerative diseases.
Bone fractures and orthopedic surgery resulting in neuropathic pain are resistant to current analgesics, which further warrants research to identify pharmacological targets for pain relief. An anti-malaria drug, Artesunate, was proposed as a potential pain-relief treatment due to its anti-inflammatory properties [175,176]; however, if and how Artesunate might aid in neuropathic pain from fractures and orthopedic surgery was unknown. Zhang et al. (2022) found that intrathecal injection of Artesunate four to six days following a bone fracture ameliorated neuropathic pain by inhibiting upregulation of CCL21, TREM2, and DAP12, resulting in reduced allodynia evident by improved mechanical and thermal thresholds [177]. Other research has shown that Artesunate treatment in the periphery following peripheral nerve injury also improves nerve regeneration and reduces inflammation, although it is unknown if the effects are also TREM2-mediated [178].
Chemotherapy is known to induce peripheral neuropathy and microglia-mediated neuropathic pain [179,180,181,182,183]. Chemotherapy agent, Cisplatin, was found to induce prolonged microgliosis in Lumbar 4-6 dorsal horn and increase microglial TREM2 and DAP12 expression. Strikingly, intrathecal injection of an anti-TREM2 neutralizing antibody 30 minutes post Cisplatin administration resulted in reduced proinflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNFα, iNOS), increased anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-4, IL-10), reduced allodynia, and reduced the loss of small nerve fibers in the periphery. This suggests that Cisplatin-induced neuropathic pain may be mediated by TREM2/DAP12 signaling [180].
Figure 5. TREM2 contributions to dorsal horn inflammation and allodynia in four neuropathic pain conditions.
Figure 5. TREM2 contributions to dorsal horn inflammation and allodynia in four neuropathic pain conditions.
Preprints 173574 g005
Collectively, the literature suggests dorsal horn TREM2/DAP12 activity contributes to neuropathic pain regardless of injury type and thus suggests it as a potential therapeutic target for analgesic drug development (Figure 1, Figure 5).

7. TREM2 in the Ventral Horn

7.1. Peripheral Nerve Injury

Microglia are known to have complex interactions with healthy and injured motoneuron cell bodies and dendrites located in the ventral horn [9,123,184,185,186,187,188]. Following a peripheral nerve injury, microglia become activated, proliferate, migrate, and adhere to motoneuron cell bodies with a heterogeneity of microglia morphological phenotypes [123,187]. Following a peripheral nerve injury, microglial TREM2 and DAP12 expression, as well as phosphorylation of downstream SYK, increase near motoneuron cell bodies [123,189,190]. Subpopulations of microglia that express the highest levels of TREM2 frequently display signs of elevated phagocytic marker, CD68, compared to alternative neighboring microglia phenotypes [123,189]. Following hypoglossal nerve injury, microglia in DAP12-deficient mice had reduced expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and prevention of motoneuron cell death in the hypoglossal nucleus, suggesting a neuroprotective role for TREM2 [190]. In support of this, we recently provided evidence from global and conditional TREM2 knockout mice that microglial TREM2 is necessary for canonical chromatolysis following sciatic nerve axotomy [123]. Chromatolysis is generally regarded as a morphological sign of regenerative capacity that parallels the exponential increase in RNA and protein synthesis required for axon regeneration [191,192]. In addition, we found TREM2 highly expressed in microglia macroclusters with typical characteristics of DAM that also contained high numbers of large CD68 granules, suggesting macro-phagocytic activity. These microglia clusters are always associated with degenerating motoneurons and attract infiltrating CD8+ T-cells [187]. TREM2 deletion did not alter the formation of these clusters but decreased the intensity of phagocytic markers. Collectively, these results suggest that TREM2 activity in the ventral horn after peripheral nerve injuries has a dual function: first, it may facilitate the regenerative phenotype of some motoneurons; second, it may promote cell death and/or clearance of other motoneurons.

7.2. Aging

Aging gradually increases microglial activation, phagocytosis, and contacts with the cell bodies and excitatory synapses of α-motoneurons in the ventral horn of mice [193]. These findings suggest that microglia may play a role in either motoneuron maintenance with age or on their decline, resulting in loss of motor force and increased fatigability with age. RNA sequencing of microglia from aged mice shows an increase in pro-inflammatory and DAM markers (e.g., Spp1, Lpl, Apoe) and indicates TREM2 as an upstream regulator of aging-related transcriptional changes [193]. Additionally, motoneurons show increased expression of APOE, a TREM2 ligand, with age [194]. These results may point to a preferential effect on motoneuron demise and suggest the APOE-TREM2 pathway as a potential therapeutic target for mitigating aging-related motor decline (Figure 1).

7.3. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Selective and progressive loss of motoneurons accompanied by neuroinflammation in the spinal cord is a hallmark of ALS. Literature suggests a duality of microglia function in ALS, as microglia generally have an anti-inflammatory neuroprotective role at early disease timepoints and gradually become pro-inflammatory and pro-degenerative as the disease progresses [195,196,197,198]. Notably, DAM microglia increase with ALS disease progression in humans and mice [87,199,200,201]. Due to DAM formation and function being tightly coupled to TREM2 [125,126,127,128,129,130,131], TREM2 has become a potential therapeutic target of interest in hopes of delaying or stopping ALS disease progression.
Post-mortem human ALS ventral horns display increased TREM2, TYROBP, and APOE mRNA expression [202]. Spatial transcriptomics performed on ventral horns from a SOD1 ALS mouse model suggests increased Trem2 and Tyrobp mRNA expression begins presymptomatically [203]. Further, TREM2 knock-out SOD1 mutant ALS mice have increased homeostatic microglia (identified by P2ry12) and reduced pro-inflammatory microglia (identified by Clec7a, Apoe, Csf1) in lumbar spinal cord ventral horns [87]. These results advocate the involvement of TREM2 early in disease pathology and the TREM2-dependent induction of a microglia proinflammatory state in ALS.
Despite these results, recent findings propose that TREM2 functions in a neuroprotective manner in ALS. Mislocalization, misfolding, and aggregation of TDP-43 contribute to ALS progression [204,205,206], and TREM2 knockout mice that had AAV-induced overexpression of human TDP-43 (hTDP-43) resulted in increased aggregation and reduced clearance of TDP-43, leading to more rapid disease progression and exacerbated loss of motor function compared to wild-type controls [52]. TDP-43 is a known ligand of TREM2 [52,53]. Thus, without TREM2, microglia fail to respond to the presence of TDP-43, and exert what appear to be a beneficial role of TREM2 in ALS pathology (Figure 1).

8. Spinal Cord Injury

Spinal cord injuries commonly result in incomplete damage with spared tissue, allowing some transmission of signals and partial recovery of function [207,208,209,210]. Whether lesions are complete or include spared tissue, there are transcriptional and neuronal circuitry changes outside the lesion zone that contribute to broader effects not strictly localized to the lesion zone or a particular spinal cord area. Another important property is the site of the lesion (cervical, thoracic, lumbar), each impairing different regions of the body. Moreover, spinal cord injuries can result from contusions (“bruising” from blunt force trauma), compression (prolonged pressure on the spinal cord), distension (stretching of the spinal cord), dislocation (shifting of the spinal cord due to dislocated vertebrae), or laceration/transection (cutting of the spinal cord) [211]. Depending on the severity, type, and location of the injury, spinal cord injuries can result in different levels of sensory, motor, and autonomic disturbances. In terms of spinal reflexes involving skeletal muscle specifically, spinal shock occurs immediately following injury, where reflexive circuitry below the injury is temporarily lost or diminished [212,213,214]. The greater the severity of the injury, the more pronounced and increased duration of spinal shock occurs. Over time, reflexive circuitry below the injury location often returns, frequently resulting in hyperreflexia even if deficits in ascending sensory transmission and descending motor commands persist [213].
The pathophysiology of spinal cord injury is two-part, where the physical damage results in the primary injury, which may be followed by a secondary damage resulting from neuroinflammation, demyelination, excitotoxicity, scarring, apoptosis, as well as whole-body complications (e.g., immunosuppression, neuroendocrine dysfunction, and [221–229gastroesophageal reflux disease) [215,216,217,218,219,220]. Following spinal cord injury, microglia govern many cellular responses and thereby promote or hinder functional recovery [221,222]. Numerous reviews have covered microglia function following spinal cord injuries, which will not be repeated in detail here [221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229]. They suggest microglia involvement in the formation of the glial scar, the recruitment of peripheral macrophages, phagocytosis of debris, neuronal plasticity, changes to the Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB), and broadly, tissue inflammation. We will focus on the potential roles played by microglial TREM2, which has become increasingly investigated recently.
Microglia are necessary for coordinating initial injury responses and infiltration of peripheral macrophages following mouse T9 dorsal contusion spinal cord injuries [221]. PLX5622-induced microglial depletion before spinal cord injury resulted in: 1) reduced astrocyte and NG2 cell (polydendrocyte) proliferation, which contributed to poor glial scar formation around the lesion core, 2) reduced peripheral macrophage infiltration, 3) diffusion of foamy macrophages that successfully infiltrated into spared white matter region outside of the lesion core, and 4) altered transcription and phenotypes of both infiltrating peripheral macrophages and activated astrocytes which lead to reduced inflammatory gene upregulation, lipid processing, cell adhesion, and proliferation. These changes exacerbated myelin and axon pathology and resulted in increased locomotor deficits/instability 14-35 days post-injury compared to non-depleted animals. Trem2 and Syk mRNA expressions were increased following spinal cord injury and were dependent on microglia activation. Trem2 specifically was suggested to be involved in governing phagocytosis, endocytosis, and cytokine response, whereas Syk was suggested to be involved in the functions mentioned above, as well as protein secretion and cytokine production [221]. This work led Zhao et al. (2025) to investigate the role of TREM2 specifically, after a T9 dorsal contusion injury model [230]. Trem2 expression increases from one to seven days post-injury and is positively correlated with genes that regulate lysosome membrane permeabilization and phagocytosis, including Cd68. In wild-type animals, TREM2 is frequently found near the lesion border, similarly to LAMP1 (Lysosome Associated Membrane Protein 1), a marker of autophagy. Surprisingly, RNA sequencing suggested improved autophagy and lysosomal pathways in TREM2 GKO mice compared to wild-type mice following spinal cord injury [230]. By silencing Trem2 in BV2 cells (a murine microglia cell line) with an siRNA in vitro, the authors suggest that TREM2 improves microglial autophagy by reducing lysosome membrane permeability and thus improving microglia mitochondrial metabolism. These results were confirmed in vivo in TREM2 GKO mice seven days post-injury [230]. Zhao et al. (2025) confirmed Brennan et al. (2022)’s results that TREM2 GKO reduces glial scar formation. However, contrary to Brennan et al.’s microglia depletion results, which caused exacerbated locomotor deficits, Zhao et al. found that TREM2-deficient mice demonstrated improved hindlimb motor evoked potentials and hindlimb gait kinematics compared to wild-type mice 35 days post-injury [221,230]. This may suggest that microglial TREM2 may be detrimental for functional recovery. Both studies were performed in a TREM2 GKO mouse model and, therefore, are unable to decouple potential TREM2 functions in microglia or infiltrating peripheral immune cells. Studies in microglia-specific cKO mice, or by pharmacologically altering TREM2 activity in a temporally specific manner, are necessary for decoupling peripheral versus central and early versus delayed TREM2 involvement.
Gao et al. (2023) compared TREM2 GKO to Cx3cr1CreER;Trem2flx/flx cKO mice that focused trem2 deletions to postnatal microglia and reported similar results as Zhao et al. (2025) in both models: improved locomotor function seven days post-injury. Intriguingly, at 28 days post-injury, only GKO mice had reduced lesion size and axon degeneration [78]. The authors suggest that this may indicate that TREM2+ infiltrating peripheral immune cells may have a greater contribution to detrimental outcomes; however, many peripheral macrophages are also CX3CR1+, meaning they also lack Trem2 in the cKO [231,232,233]. Intriguingly, single-cell RNA sequencing of both knockout models revealed an increase in perivascular macrophages, suggesting potential alterations at the BBB. No difference in the total number of infiltrating immune cells was observed in both knockout models compared to wild-types, suggesting that TREM2 is not directly involved in peripheral immune cell recruitment. TREM2 knockout myeloid cells had reduced gene expression associated with phagocytosis and lysosomes, assessed by CD68 expression around the lesions [78]. Collectively, these results suggest that TREM2 activity may interfere with functional recovery following spinal cord injury, although improved methodology for temporal and cell-specific regulation of Trem2 is needed to confirm this conclusion (Figure 1).

9. TREM2 Along Peripheral Axons

9.1. Anatomical Overview of Peripheral Nerves

Peripheral nerves may contain motor, sensory, and autonomic axons in variable proportions. All spinal nerves are considered mixed nerves. A single nerve fiber may consist of multiple unmyelinated axons surrounded by the same Schwann cell, or a single myelinated axon with its own Schwann cells. Nerve fibers and their associated Schwann cells are surrounded by an endoneurium. Multiple nerve fibers are further grouped into fascicles and surrounded by the perineurium. The epineurium further bundles multiple fascicles together to form the nerve. The vasa nervorum is the network of blood vessels that run throughout the nerve and may contain infiltrating immune cells [234,235,236,237,238]. Resident and infiltrating immune cells (including macrophages), fibroblasts, perineural cells, pericytes, and endothelial cells can all be found within the nerve as well [239,240,241,242]. Disruption of peripheral nerve function directly inhibits the transmission between the CNS and the periphery. Identification of mechanisms to promote recovery or prevent degeneration in aging, disease, and following injury is crucial for maintaining proper circuitry function, and therefore, organismal function. Below we discuss the implications of TREM2 in Schwann cells and peripheral macrophages along peripheral nerves.

9.2. TREM2 in Schwann Cells

Recently, Zhang et al. (2024) published novel evidence that Schwann Cells also express TREM2. By utilizing lentiviral TREM2 knockdown in murine Schwann cell primary culture, Zhang et al. demonstrate that TREM2 deficiency results in impaired PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling, and activated AMPK and caspases, culminating in mitochondrial damage, impaired mitochondrial metabolism/glycolytic flux, and ultimately apoptosis in Schwann cells. Furthermore, in a mouse model of Acute Motor Axonal Neuropathy (AMAN), Schwann cell TREM2 deficiency exacerbated sciatic nerve conduction by preventing myelin debris clearance, increasing Schwann cell apoptosis, and preventing axon regeneration in vivo [24]. Collectively, this is the first evidence of TREM2 function in Schwann cells and involvement in PNS axon regeneration (Figure 1). TREM2 axonal-Schwann cell signaling should be further explored in other disease contexts to fully understand its role in Schwann cell neuroimmune and homeostatic signaling.
Schwannomas, for example, are benign tumors formed from Schwann Cells in the CNS or PNS, but most commonly along the vestibular nerve. Around five percent of vestibular schwannomas occur due to a mutation in the NF2 gene (which encodes Merlin protein) and is highly involved in RAS/Raf/MEK/ERK, PI3K/AKT/mTORC1, and other signaling cascades [243]. The remaining 95% of schwannoma cases are sporadic with unknown causes. The tumor microenvironment around schwannomas is diverse but highly influenced by Tumor-Associated Macrophages (TAMs), as there is a correlation between immune-suppressive TAMs and schwannoma progression [243,244]. Although TREM2 has been minimally investigated in the context of schwannomas specifically, TREM2 is a notorious marker for immune-suppressive TAMs [245,246]. In TREM2 knockout mice with fibrosarcoma tumors, the tumor microenvironment was altered to allow increased infiltrating T-cells and improved innate tumor control [245]. Fu et al. (2023) also performed computational analysis on publicly available mRNA expression datasets from individuals with sporadic vestibular schwannomas, which suggested increased TREM2 expression correlated with infiltration of immune cells in human vestibular schwannomas [247]. It is currently unknown if TREM2 mutations are a risk factor for sporadic schwannomas despite utilizing similar downstream signaling cascades, nor if TREM2 in TAMs is involved in schwannoma progression. Collectively, however, the discussed results suggest TREM2 as a potential therapeutic target for peripheral schwannomas and may be translatable to other types of peripheral nerve tumors, which warrants investigation.

9.3. TREM2 in Peripheral Macrophages

Injury-induced axotomy of peripheral axons results in nerve fiber breakdown distal to the injury, following a process known as Wallerian Degeneration. In 1969, Olsson and Sjöstrand demonstrated that macrophages rapidly invade the nerve at the injury location and along the distal stump that is undergoing Wallerian Degeneration [248]. These macrophages provide evidence of phagocytosis as early as three days post-injury, progressively becoming “foamy” macrophages, consistent with lipid metabolism from myelin and axonal debris [242,249,250]. We now know these macrophages also utilize VEGFA-dependent mechanisms to promote angiogenesis and form vascular bridges between proximal and distal nerve stumps, allowing proliferating Schwann cells to bridge the gap and guide regenerating axons to their targets [248,251,252,253,254,255,256,257]. Within peripheral nerves, both PNS-resident macrophages as well as infiltrating monocyte-derived macrophages have been identified post-injury. PNS-resident macrophages are suggested to be “microglia-like” as they self-proliferate and have similar transcriptional profiles as microglia (both expressing Tmem119, P2ry12, Siglech, Trem2, and Olfml3), which are significantly different than infiltrating monocyte-derived macrophages and DRG resident macrophages. Surprisingly, phagocytic bead assay experiments suggest surveying PNS-resident macrophages in the sciatic nerve have greater baseline phagocytic capacity than surveying microglia in spinal cords, potentially suggesting more rapid response capabilities [241,242]. Intriguingly, following nerve injury, GO terms for PNS-resident macrophages specifically suggest involvement with angiogenesis, collagen fibril organization, nerve organization, and axon guidance [241,242]. It remains to be elucidated whether PNS-resident macrophages are the specific subtype of cells responsible for crucial angiogenic bridging between nerve stumps. Following sciatic nerve injury, RNA sequencing experiments have revealed that foamy PNS-resident macrophages display elevated Trem2, Cd68, Arg1, and App1 [242,257], suggesting this subpopulation is greatly involved in lipid metabolism and leans toward an immunosuppressive response [242]. Collectively, it’s plausible that PNS-resident macrophages may utilize TREM2 to rapidly detect damaged axons, engulf myelin debris, aid in initiating angiogenesis to promote nerve stump bridging, and ultimately resolve inflammatory responses over time. Based on this literature, we postulate that TREM2 in PNS macrophages may be beneficial following axotomy.
The involvement of PNS macrophages in other neuropathies is a currently developing field of study. In mutant SOD1 ALS rodent models, macrophages infiltrate the peripheral nerve in the pre-symptomatic stage, become foamy, and are filled with mutant SOD1 [258,259,260,261]. This finding was confirmed in humans with sporadic ALS [262]. It is generally accepted that peripheral nerve inflammation is not the cause of ALS, but instead a response to early disease changes. However, peripheral macrophages can significantly impact disease progression, as modifying peripheral macrophages to be anti-inflammatory reduces CNS microgliosis, transcriptionally alters microglia to be more “supportive,” and extends the life span of ALS mice [262]. The role of PNS-resident macrophages along peripheral axons in the context of Guillian-Barré syndrome, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy, Diabetic Polyneuropathy, Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, and Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease was recently reviewed by Msheik et al. [263]. Generally, it is agreed that the microenvironment around PNS resident macrophages greatly shapes their response and function, which can make it difficult when analyzing PNS-resident macrophages in different nerves, organisms, or neuropathies. However, the finding that modulating peripheral macrophages can alter CNS microglia response and disease prognosis makes it a therapeutic target regardless of being beneficial or detrimental. Whether TREM2 in PNS-resident macrophages contributes to the heterogeneity of immune response across neuropathies is currently understudied.

10. TREM2 in Muscle

10.1. Anatomical Overview of Skeletal Muscle

Skeletal muscle not only functions to allow organismal movement and postural control, but also houses proprioceptive receptors, which provide a sense of spatial self-awareness and function to prevent muscle injury. A single muscle is covered by a connective tissue layer called the epimysium. The perimysium further divides the muscle into bundles, which allows vasculature and nerves to run through the body of the muscle [264,265]. Ia and II sensory afferents wrap around intrafusal muscle fibers in muscle spindles surrounded by a fibrous muscle capsule [266,267,268]. β- and γ-motoneuron innervation of intrafusal fibers control the sensitivity of the muscle spindle and helps regulate muscle tone [269]. Extrafusal muscle fibers, located outside the muscle capsule, are innervated by α- and β-motoneurons, generally accepted to be force-generating during organismal movement [270,271]. The location at which a motoneuron synapses onto muscle fibers is called the Neuromuscular Junction (NMJ). Here, a motoneuron’s axon terminal aligns with a muscle’s postsynaptic region, characterized by multiple post-junctional folds. The motor axon releases acetylcholine, which binds to muscle nicotinic acetylcholine receptors causing a muscle action potential that ultimately triggers muscle contraction [264,265]. Terminal Schwann cells are a non-myelinating glial cell that encases the NMJ and function to provide structural support, neurotrophic support, neurotransmission regulation, and aid in synapse remodeling during development and reinnervation following injury [272,273,274,275]. In addition to neurons and Schwann cells, satellite glial cells, infiltrating immune cells (including infiltrating macrophages), pericytes, endothelial cells, fibro-adipogenic progenitors, adipocytes, fibroblasts, and smooth muscle cells can all be found in skeletal muscle [276,277,278,279].

10.2. Overview of Neuromuscular Junction Denervation/Reinnervation

Following a peripheral nerve injury, Wallerian Degeneration occurs, which includes degeneration of the axon terminal and, therefore, denervation from the muscle. Peripheral macrophages and terminal Schwann cells aid in the removal of myelin and neuronal debris. Despite denervation, the post-junctional receptors along the NMJ remain intact, being anchored to basal laminae and covered by terminal Schwann cells [280]. Terminal Schwann cells have been shown to extend processes to neighboring intact NMJ’s to aid in motor axon sprouting and reinnervation of the denervated synapse, while recruiting immune cells to the NMJ through the release of cytokines [256,281]. With increasing time of denervation, the area of terminal Schwann cell coverage declines, accompanied by a loss of post-synaptic acetylcholine receptors and NMJ fragmentation [280,281,282]. Upon axon regeneration, once the axon has reached its target muscle, terminal Schwann cells aid in guiding the regenerating axon to/through the denervated NMJ [283]. Currently, it is unknown if terminal Schwann cells express TREM2 like the myelinating Schwann cells along peripheral axons. If either infiltrating peripheral macrophages or terminal Schwann cells near the NMJ utilize TREM2 to aid in promoting muscle reinnervation, TREM2 may be used as a therapeutic target for increased functional recovery following peripheral nerve injury, or to aid in conditions such as ALS, where muscle reinnervation does not normally occur.

10.3. TREM2 and the Neuromuscular Junction

TREM2+ macrophages have been identified in aged, diseased, and injured skeletal muscle tissue [284,285,286], but to date, are more often associated with muscle fiber health rather than NMJ mechanisms specifically. RNA sequencing analysis on human muscle tissue identified a subset of Lipid-Associated Macrophages only present in aged tissue that had elevated TREM2 expression and enriched GO terms for phagocytosis and lipid metabolism processes. These cells also had elevated SPP1 (Osteopontin/Secreted Phosphoprotein 1) expression, which is known to promote fibrosis, suggesting this macrophage subtype may be involved in age-related muscle decline [284]. In a mouse model of volumetric muscle loss with persistent inflammation, spatial transcriptomics identified “Scar-Associated Macrophages” with high Trem2 and Spp1 levels as the main driver of persistent inflammation and fibrosis [285]. However, the specific ligands and role of TREM2 in the macrophage’s response to injury were not identified. Recent literature suggests a protective role of TREM2 in skeletal muscle homeostasis, as mutant TREM2 results in altered skeletal muscle composition and strength in mice [287]. Along these lines, Tacconi et al. (2025) published a novel in vitro study illustrating that bone-marrow derived macrophages acquire a Lipid-Associated Macrophage/TREM2+ phenotype following exposure to palmitate and oleate (1:2, “FFA”). These TREM2+ macrophages consume and store the lipids, suggesting a protective role for their environment, but they also induce transcriptomic changes in neighboring macrophages and skeletal muscles by releasing extracellular vesicles. Extracellular vesicle release subsequently causes increased expression of TREM2 and IL-10 in neighboring macrophages, as well as altered insulin sensitivity, mitochondrial metabolism, and extracellular matrix components in skeletal muscle cells, suggesting tissue remodeling [288]. Collectively, this evidence suggests that TREM2+ macrophages in muscle work to maintain muscle homeostasis but may contribute to fibrosis and muscle alterations with disease or injury.
Despite the current lack of knowledge regarding TREM2 involvement with NMJs specifically, a vast body of literature exists on changes in macrophage activity at the NMJ in injury and disease [256]. The number of macrophages in muscle and their association with the NMJ increase following peripheral nerve injury [256,289] and with ALS disease progression [290,291]. Peripheral nerve injuries performed in mice that lack Ccr2 have impaired macrophage recruitment to the muscle and diminish muscle function with time, suggesting that infiltrating macrophages are beneficial for muscle reinnervation and functional recovery [289]. In rodent models of SMA, the number of macrophages in muscle dwindles with disease progression. This may indicate a beneficial role for macrophages or simply correlate with the progressive loss of muscle innervation [292]. It is currently unknown if the suggested benefits of infiltrating macrophages into muscle and their association with NMJs in injury or disease involve TREM2 signaling.

11. TREM2 as a Therapeutic Target

We hope we conveyed that TREM2 can have beneficial or detrimental effects depending on the cell type and microenvironment, animal model, age of the organism, kind of disease or injury, and stage of disease or injury. This implies that any TREM2 therapeutics require specificity on cell type, spatial, and temporal targeting. As recently reviewed, TREM2 activity can be modulated via 1) enhancing or blocking TREM2 ligands, 2) introducing agonist or antagonist antibodies, 3) targeting ADAM10/17 to promote or diminish sTREM2, 4) modulating Trem2 gene expression, or 5) targeting downstream targets (e.g., pSYK) [293]. Several agonist or antagonist TREM2 antibodies capable of crossing the BBB are currently in or have previously been in phase one and two clinical trials [27]. Although many of these antibodies have shown success at modulating microglia and provide some degree of temporal specificity due to antibody half-lives, there is limited research suggesting cell-type or spatial specificity, which may result in off-target and potentially detrimental effects over time. Additional studies should be done on a whole-organismal level and in various disease/injury models to elucidate the efficacy of TREM2 therapeutic antibodies. The utilization of recombinant Adeno-Associated Virus (rAAV) gene therapy to target TREM2 may provide cell type specificity at the cost of temporal controls due to permanent gene editing. New transgenes and viral vectors including temporal controls using clinically approved doxycycline doses will need to be developed [294]. Other current work is being performed to improve rAAV tropism for myeloid cells, such as microglia, which have notoriously been difficult to transfect [295]. PR009 (LY3884965) is a current rAAV gene therapy in Phase 1/2a clinical trials for a rare neurodegenerative disorder, Adult-onset Leukoencephalopathy with axonal Spheroids and Pigmented glia (ALSP), which is caused by mutations in Csf1r. PR009 is suggested to increase TREM2 expression in microglia and, therefore, may be a potential therapeutic intervention for other neurodegenerative conditions with TREM2 mutation risk factors [296]. Further, PR009 may be a valuable tool for pre-clinical research to decouple central versus peripheral implications of TREM2 in conditions such as ALS, spinal cord injury, and peripheral nerve injury. By having cell type, spatial, and temporal specificity of TREM2 targeting, the field may finally unravel the complexity of TREM2’s implication throughout the body in health, aging, disease, and injury.

12. Concluding Remarks

Functioning neuronal circuitry between the spinal cord and the periphery is crucial for movement, sensation, autonomic function, and the ability to respond to one’s environment. Aging, injury, and disease all have different implications on spinal reflex circuitry, but all present with neuroinflammation. TREM2 is an immune-modulatory receptor found in myeloid cells in both the CNS and PNS, and more specifically along all anatomical regions of spinal reflex circuitry. Depending on cell type, microenvironment, age, and type of disease or injury, TREM2 can be beneficial or detrimental (Figure 1). Due to the complexities of TREM2 on a whole-organismal level, the development of cell-type, spatial, and temporal specificity for visualizing and modulating TREM2 activity is crucial for pre-clinical research to unravel CNS versus PNS TREM2 effects on health, aging, disease, and injury, and imperative for the development of efficient therapeutic advances with minimal off-target effects.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.S.P., and F.J.A.; writing—review and editing, T.S.P., E.L.L., and F.J.A.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

NIH-NINDS R01 NS111969 (F.J.A.); NIH-NINDS F31 NS130993 (T.S.P)

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Patricia Jill Ward (Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA), Dr. Nicholas Varvel (Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA), Dr. Dario Carrasco (Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA), and graduate student William M. McCallum (Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA) for revising and providing input on this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

5XFAD 5 familial Alzheimer’s disease mutations
aa Amino acid
AD Alzheimer’s disease
ADAM10 A Disintegrin and Metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 10
ADAM17 A Disintegrin and Metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17
ADI-R Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised
AKT Protein kinase B
ALS Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
ALSP Adult-onset Leukoencephalopathy with axonal Spheroids and Pigmented glia
AMAN Acute Motor Axonal Neuropathy
AMPK AMP-activated protein kinase
APOE Apolipoprotein E
app1 Antiphagocytic Protein 1
arg1 Arginase 1
BBB Blood Brain Barrier
C1q Complement Component 1q
CCL21 CC chemokine ligand 21/6Ckine
ccr2 Chemokine (C-C motif) Receptor 2
CKO Conditional Knockout
Clec7a C-type lectin domain family 7, member A.
CNS Central Nervous System
CSF1 Colony Stimulating Factor 1
CSF1-R Colony Stimulating Factor 1 Receptro
CTSD Cathepsin D
CX3CL1 Fractalkine
CX3CR1 C-X3-C motif chemokine receptor 1/Fractalkine receptor
DAM Disease Associate Microglia
DAP10/Hcst DNAX activating protein of 10 KD
DAP12/tryobp DNAX activating protein of 12 KD
DRG Dorsal Root Ganglion
ePtdSer Externalized Phosphatidylserine
ERK Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase
GKO Global Knockout
IL-10 Interleukin-10
IL-1β Interleukin -1 β
IL-34 Interleukin-34
IL-6 Interleukin-6
ITAM Immunoreceptor Tyrosine-based Activation Motif.
KV2.1 Potassium Voltage-Gated Channel, Shab-Related Subfamily, Member 1.
LAMP1 Lysosome Associated Membrane Protein 1
LPL Lipoprotein Lipase
LPS lysophosphatidylcholine
MAPK Mitogen Actived Protein Kinaseitogen A
MEK mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase
MND Motor Neuron Disease
mTOR mechanistic target of rapamycin/mammalian target of rapamycin
NF-κB Nuclear Factor kappa-light-chain enhancer of activated B cells
NF2 Merline
NMJ Neuromuscular Junction
olfml3 Olfactomedin-like 3
P2RX4 P2X purinoceptor 4
P2RY12 Purinergic Receptor P2Y, G Protein Coupled, 12
PD Parkinson’s disease
PI3K Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase.
PLCγ Phospholipase C
PNS Peripheral Nervous Sysyem
PtdSer Phosphatidylserine
PYK2 Proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2
Raf Rapidly Accelerated Fibrosarcoma
RAS Reticular Activating System
RNA ribonucleic acid
SHIP1 Src homology 2 (SH2) domain-containing inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase 1.
SMA Spinal Muscular Atrophy
SOD1 Superoxide Dismutase 1.
spp1 Secreted Phosphoprotein 1.
sTREM2 Soluble Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myelioid Cells 2
STZ streptozotocin
SYK Spleen tyrosine kinase
TAMS Tumor Associated Macrophages
TDP-43 TAR DNA-binding protein 43
TGF-β Transforming Growth Factor beta
Tmem119 Transmembrane protein 119
TNFα Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
TREM2 Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cells 2
VAV2/3 Vav family of guanine nucleotide exchange factors 2/3
VEGFA Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

References

  1. Philips, T.; Robberecht, W. Neuroinflammation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: role of glial activation in motor neuron disease. The Lancet Neurology 2011, 10, 253–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Liu, J.; Wang, F. Role of neuroinflammation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: cellular mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Frontiers in immunology 2017, 8, 1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hooten, K.G.; Beers, D.R.; Zhao, W.; Appel, S.H. Protective and toxic neuroinflammation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurotherapeutics 2015, 12, 364–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Brennan, F.H.; Swarts, E.A.; Kigerl, K.A.; Mifflin, K.A.; Guan, Z.; Noble, B.T.; Wang, Y.; Witcher, K.G.; Godbout, J.P.; Popovich, P.G. Microglia promote maladaptive plasticity in autonomic circuitry after spinal cord injury in mice. Science Translational Medicine 2024, 16, eadi3259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Thompson, A.K.; Sinkjær, T. Chapter 30 - Features and physiology of spinal stretch reflexes in people with chronic spinal cord injury. In Cellular, Molecular, Physiological, and Behavioral Aspects of Spinal Cord Injury, Rajendram, R., Preedy, V.R., Martin, C.R., Eds.; Academic Press: 2022; pp. 365-375.
  6. Li, C.; Xiong, W.; Wan, B.; Kong, G.; Wang, S.; Wang, Y.; Fan, J. Role of peripheral immune cells in spinal cord injury. Cell Mol Life Sci 2022, 80, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. DiSabato, D.J.; Marion, C.M.; Mifflin, K.A.; Alfredo, A.N.; Rodgers, K.A.; Kigerl, K.A.; Popovich, P.G.; McTigue, D.M. System failure: Systemic inflammation following spinal cord injury. European journal of immunology 2024, 54, 2250274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Schwab, J.M.; Zhang, Y.; Kopp, M.A.; Brommer, B.; Popovich, P.G. The paradox of chronic neuroinflammation, systemic immune suppression, autoimmunity after traumatic chronic spinal cord injury. Experimental neurology 2014, 258, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pottorf, T.S.; Rotterman, T.M.; McCallum, W.M.; Haley-Johnson, Z.A.; Alvarez, F.J. The Role of Microglia in Neuroinflammation of the Spinal Cord after Peripheral Nerve Injury. Cells 2022, 11, 2083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Konishi, H.; Kiyama, H. Microglial TREM2/DAP12 Signaling: A Double-Edged Sword in Neural Diseases. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience 2018, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Colonna, M. The biology of TREM receptors. Nature Reviews Immunology 2023, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Colonna, M. TREMs in the immune system and beyond. Nature reviews. Immunology 2003, 3, 445–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yang, J.; Fu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Xiong, M.; Meng, L.; Zhang, Z. TREM2 ectodomain and its soluble form in Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of neuroinflammation 2020, 17, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lanier, L.L. DAP10-and DAP12-associated receptors in innate immunity. Immunological reviews 2009, 227, 150–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Allcock, R.J.; Barrow, A.D.; Forbes, S.; Beck, S.; Trowsdale, J. The human TREM gene cluster at 6p21. 1 encodes both activating and inhibitory single IgV domain receptors and includes NKp44. European journal of immunology 2003, 33, 567–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kasamatsu, J.; Deng, M.; Azuma, M.; Funami, K.; Shime, H.; Oshiumi, H.; Matsumoto, M.; Kasahara, M.; Seya, T. Double-stranded RNA analog and type I interferon regulate expression of Trem paired receptors in murine myeloid cells. BMC immunology 2016, 17, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Stet, R.J.; Hermsen, T.; Westphal, A.H.; Jukes, J.; Engelsma, M.; Lidy Verburg-van Kemenade, B.; Dortmans, J.; Aveiro, J.; Savelkoul, H.F. Novel immunoglobulin-like transcripts in teleost fish encode polymorphic receptors with cytoplasmic ITAM or ITIM and a new structural Ig domain similar to the natural cytotoxicity receptor NKp44. Immunogenetics 2005, 57, 77–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Viertlboeck, B.C.; Schmitt, R.; Göbel, T.W. The chicken immunoregulatory receptor families SIRP, TREM, and CMRF35/CD300L. Immunogenetics 2006, 58, 180–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jin, S.C.; Benitez, B.A.; Karch, C.M.; Cooper, B.; Skorupa, T.; Carrell, D.; Norton, J.B.; Hsu, S.; Harari, O.; Cai, Y. Coding variants in TREM2 increase risk for Alzheimer’s disease. Human molecular genetics 2014, 23, 5838–5846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jay, T.R.; von Saucken, V.E.; Landreth, G.E. TREM2 in neurodegenerative diseases. Molecular neurodegeneration 2017, 12, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Peng, Q.; Malhotra, S.; Torchia, J.A.; Kerr, W.G.; Coggeshall, K.M.; Humphrey, M.B. TREM2-and DAP12-dependent activation of PI3K requires DAP10 and is inhibited by SHIP1. Science signaling 2010, 3, ra38–ra38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wunderlich, P.; Glebov, K.; Kemmerling, N.; Tien, N.T.; Neumann, H.; Walter, J. Sequential proteolytic processing of the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-2 (TREM2) protein by ectodomain shedding and γ-secretase-dependent intramembranous cleavage. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2013, 288, 33027–33036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lin, M.; Yu, J.X.; Zhang, W.X.; Lao, F.X.; Huang, H.C. Roles of TREM2 in the Pathological Mechanism and the Therapeutic Strategies of Alzheimer’s Disease. J Prev Alzheimers Dis 2024, 11, 1682–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, N.; Ji, Q.; Chen, Y.; Wen, X.; Shan, F. TREM2 deficiency impairs the energy metabolism of Schwann cells and exacerbates peripheral neurological deficits. Cell Death & Disease 2024, 15, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sun, H.; Feng, J.; Tang, L. Function of TREM1 and TREM2 in liver-related diseases. Cells 2020, 9, 2626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lee, J.-W.; Lee, I.-H.; Iimura, T.; Kong, S.W. Two macrophages, osteoclasts and microglia: from development to pleiotropy. Bone Research 2021, 9, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Yang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, L. TREM2+ macrophages: a key role in disease development. Frontiers in Immunology, 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ulland, T.K.; Colonna, M. TREM2 — a key player in microglial biology and Alzheimer disease. Nature Reviews Neurology 2018, 14, 667–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Colonna, M.; Wang, Y. TREM2 variants: new keys to decipher Alzheimer disease pathogenesis. Nat Rev Neurosci 2016, 17, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hansen, D.V.; Hanson, J.E.; Sheng, M. Microglia in Alzheimer’s disease. J Cell Biol 2018, 217, 459–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Painter, M.M.; Atagi, Y.; Liu, C.C.; Rademakers, R.; Xu, H.; Fryer, J.D.; Bu, G. TREM2 in CNS homeostasis and neurodegenerative disease. Mol Neurodegener 2015, 10, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tang, D.; Kang, R.; Coyne, C.B.; Zeh, H.J.; Lotze, M.T. PAMPs and DAMPs: signal 0s that spur autophagy and immunity. Immunol Rev 2012, 249, 158–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Brantley-Sieders, D.M.; Zhuang, G.; Vaught, D.; Freeman, T.; Hwang, Y.; Hicks, D.; Chen, J. Host deficiency in Vav2/3 guanine nucleotide exchange factors impairs tumor growth, survival, and angiogenesis in vivo. Mol Cancer Res 2009, 7, 615–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, C.; Götz, J. Pyk2 is a Novel Tau Tyrosine Kinase that is Regulated by the Tyrosine Kinase Fyn. J Alzheimers Dis 2018, 64, 205–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Martelli, M.P.; Lin, H.; Zhang, W.; Samelson, L.E.; Bierer, B.E. Signaling via LAT (linker for T-cell activation) and Syk/ZAP70 is required for ERK activation and NFAT transcriptional activation following CD2 stimulation. Blood 2000, 96, 2181–2190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tan, M.S.; Yu, J.T.; Tan, L. Bridging integrator 1 (BIN1): form, function, and Alzheimer’s disease. Trends Mol Med 2013, 19, 594–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Griciuc, A.; Patel, S.; Federico, A.N.; Choi, S.H.; Innes, B.J.; Oram, M.K.; Cereghetti, G.; McGinty, D.; Anselmo, A.; Sadreyev, R.I.; et al. TREM2 Acts Downstream of CD33 in Modulating Microglial Pathology in Alzheimer’s Disease. Neuron 2019, 103, 820–835.e827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cheng, B.; Li, X.; Dai, K.; Duan, S.; Rong, Z.; Chen, Y.; Lü, L.; Liu, Z.; Huang, X.; Xu, H. Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-2 (TREM2) interacts with colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) but is not necessary for CSF1/CSF1R-mediated microglial survival. Frontiers in immunology 2021, 12, 633796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, L.; Xiang, X.; Li, Y.; Bu, G.; Chen, X.-F. TREM2 and sTREM2 in Alzheimer’s disease: from mechanisms to therapies. Molecular Neurodegeneration 2025, 20, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mócsai, A.; Ruland, J.; Tybulewicz, V.L. The SYK tyrosine kinase: a crucial player in diverse biological functions. Nature Reviews Immunology 2010, 10, 387–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, Y.; Cella, M.; Mallinson, K.; Ulrich, J.D.; Young, K.L.; Robinette, M.L.; Gilfillan, S.; Krishnan, G.M.; Sudhakar, S.; Zinselmeyer, B.H.; et al. TREM2 lipid sensing sustains the microglial response in an Alzheimer’s disease model. Cell 2015, 160, 1061–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Shirotani, K.; Hori, Y.; Yoshizaki, R.; Higuchi, E.; Colonna, M.; Saito, T.; Hashimoto, S.; Saito, T.; Saido, T.C.; Iwata, N. Aminophospholipids are signal-transducing TREM2 ligands on apoptotic cells. Scientific Reports 2019, 9, 7508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kober, D.L.; Stuchell-Brereton, M.D.; Kluender, C.E.; Dean, H.B.; Strickland, M.R.; Steinberg, D.F.; Nelson, S.S.; Baban, B.; Holtzman, D.M.; Frieden, C. Functional insights from biophysical study of TREM2 interactions with apoE and Aβ1-42. Alzheimer’s & Dementia 2021, 17, 475–488. [Google Scholar]
  44. Cannon, J.P.; O’Driscoll, M.; Litman, G.W. Specific lipid recognition is a general feature of CD300 and TREM molecules. Immunogenetics 2012, 64, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Song, W.; Hooli, B.; Mullin, K.; Jin, S.C.; Cella, M.; Ulland, T.K.; Wang, Y.; Tanzi, R.E.; Colonna, M. Alzheimer’s disease-associated TREM2 variants exhibit either decreased or increased ligand-dependent activation. Alzheimers Dement 2017, 13, 381–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Atagi, Y.; Liu, C.C.; Painter, M.M.; Chen, X.F.; Verbeeck, C.; Zheng, H.; Li, X.; Rademakers, R.; Kang, S.S.; Xu, H.; et al. Apolipoprotein E Is a Ligand for Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cells 2 (TREM2). J Biol Chem 2015, 290, 26043–26050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bailey, C.C.; DeVaux, L.B.; Farzan, M. The Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cells 2 Binds Apolipoprotein E. J Biol Chem 2015, 290, 26033–26042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kawabori, M.; Kacimi, R.; Kauppinen, T.; Calosing, C.; Kim, J.Y.; Hsieh, C.L.; Nakamura, M.C.; Yenari, M.A. Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) deficiency attenuates phagocytic activities of microglia and exacerbates ischemic damage in experimental stroke. Journal of Neuroscience 2015, 35, 3384–3396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Daws, M.R.; Sullam, P.M.; Niemi, E.C.; Chen, T.T.; Tchao, N.K.; Seaman, W.E. Pattern recognition by TREM-2: binding of anionic ligands. J Immunol 2003, 171, 594–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Iizasa, E.i.; Chuma, Y.; Uematsu, T.; Kubota, M.; Kawaguchi, H.; Umemura, M.; Toyonaga, K.; Kiyohara, H.; Yano, I.; Colonna, M.; et al. TREM2 is a receptor for non-glycosylated mycolic acids of mycobacteria that limits anti-mycobacterial macrophage activation. Nature Communications 2021, 12, 2299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhao, Y.; Wu, X.; Li, X.; Jiang, L.-L.; Gui, X.; Liu, Y.; Sun, Y.; Zhu, B.; Piña-Crespo, J.C.; Zhang, M. TREM2 is a receptor for β-amyloid that mediates microglial function. Neuron 2018, 97, 1023–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Xie, M.; Liu, Y.U.; Zhao, S.; Zhang, L.; Bosco, D.B.; Pang, Y.-P.; Zhong, J.; Sheth, U.; Martens, Y.A.; Zhao, N. TREM2 interacts with TDP-43 and mediates microglial neuroprotection against TDP-43-related neurodegeneration. Nature neuroscience 2022, 25, 26–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mills III, W.A.; Eyo, U.B. TREMble before TREM2: the mighty microglial receptor conferring neuroprotective properties in TDP-43 mediated neurodegeneration. Neuroscience Bulletin 2023, 39, 163–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mason, L.H.; Willette-Brown, J.; Taylor, L.S.; McVicar, D.W. Regulation of Ly49D/DAP12 Signal Transduction by Src-Family Kinases and CD4512. The Journal of Immunology 2006, 176, 6615–6623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Alonso, G.; Koegl, M.; Mazurenko, N.; Courtneidge, S.A. Sequence Requirements for Binding of Src Family Tyrosine Kinases to Activated Growth Factor Receptors (∗). Journal of Biological Chemistry 1995, 270, 9840–9848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Luo, J.; Elwood, F.; Britschgi, M.; Villeda, S.; Zhang, H.; Ding, Z.; Zhu, L.; Alabsi, H.; Getachew, R.; Narasimhan, R.; et al. Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) signaling in injured neurons facilitates protection and survival. Journal of Experimental Medicine 2013, 210, 157–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hamilton, J.A. CSF-1 signal transduction. Journal of Leukocyte Biology 1997, 62, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Pixley, F.J.; Stanley, E.R. CSF-1 regulation of the wandering macrophage: complexity in action. Trends Cell Biology 2004, 14, 628–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Guan, Z.; Kuhn, J.A.; Wang, X.; Colquitt, B.; Solorzano, C.; Vaman, S.; Guan, A.K.; Evans-Reinsch, Z.; Braz, J.; Devor, M. Injured sensory neuron–derived CSF1 induces microglial proliferation and DAP12-dependent pain. Nature Neuroscience 2016, 19, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Otero, K.; Turnbull, I.R.; Poliani, P.L.; Vermi, W.; Cerutti, E.; Aoshi, T.; Tassi, I.; Takai, T.; Stanley, S.L.; Miller, M. Macrophage colony-stimulating factor induces the proliferation and survival of macrophages via a pathway involving DAP12 and β-catenin. Nature immunology 2009, 10, 734–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Thornton, P.; Sevalle, J.; Deery, M.J.; Fraser, G.; Zhou, Y.; Ståhl, S.; Franssen, E.H.; Dodd, R.B.; Qamar, S.; Gomez Perez-Nievas, B.; et al. TREM2 shedding by cleavage at the H157‐S158 bond is accelerated for the Alzheimer’s disease‐associated H157Y variant. EMBO Molecular Medicine 2017, 9, 1366–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Schlepckow, K.; Kleinberger, G.; Fukumori, A.; Feederle, R.; Lichtenthaler, S.F.; Steiner, H.; Haass, C. An Alzheimer-associated TREM2 variant occurs at the ADAM cleavage site and affects shedding and phagocytic function. EMBO molecular medicine 2017, 9, 1356–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Glebov, K.; Wunderlich, P.; Karaca, I.; Walter, J. Functional involvement of γ-secretase in signaling of the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-2 (TREM2). Journal of Neuroinflammation 2016, 13, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Feuerbach, D.; Schindler, P.; Barske, C.; Joller, S.; Beng-Louka, E.; Worringer, K.A.; Kommineni, S.; Kaykas, A.; Ho, D.J.; Ye, C.; et al. ADAM17 is the main sheddase for the generation of human triggering receptor expressed in myeloid cells (hTREM2) ectodomain and cleaves TREM2 after Histidine 157. Neuroscience Letters 2017, 660, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Filipello, F.; Goldsbury, C.; You, S.F.; Locca, A.; Karch, C.M.; Piccio, L. Soluble TREM2: Innocent bystander or active player in neurological diseases? Neurobiology of Disease 2022, 165, 105630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Moutinho, M.; Coronel, I.; Tsai, A.P.; Di Prisco, G.V.; Pennington, T.; Atwood, B.K.; Puntambekar, S.S.; Smith, D.C.; Martinez, P.; Han, S.; et al. TREM2 splice isoforms generate soluble TREM2 species that disrupt long-term potentiation. Genome Medicine 2023, 15, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Moutinho, M.; Landreth, G.E. TREM2 splicing emerges as crucial aspect to understand TREM2 biology. Journal of Leukocyte Biology 2021, 110, 827–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Piccio, L.; Buonsanti, C.; Cella, M.; Tassi, I.; Schmidt, R.E.; Fenoglio, C.; Rinker, J., II; Naismith, R.T.; Panina-Bordignon, P.; Passini, N.; et al. Identification of soluble TREM-2 in the cerebrospinal fluid and its association with multiple sclerosis and CNS inflammation. Brain : a journal of neurology 2008, 131, 3081–3091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Jericó, I.; Vicuña-Urriza, J.; Blanco-Luquin, I.; Macias, M.; Martinez-Merino, L.; Roldán, M.; Rojas-Garcia, R.; Pagola-Lorz, I.; Carbayo, A.; De Luna, N.; et al. Profiling TREM2 expression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity 2023, 109, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhong, L.; Chen, X.F.; Wang, T.; Wang, Z.; Liao, C.; Wang, Z.; Huang, R.; Wang, D.; Li, X.; Wu, L.; et al. Soluble TREM2 induces inflammatory responses and enhances microglial survival. J Exp Med 2017, 214, 597–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Song, W.M.; Joshita, S.; Zhou, Y.; Ulland, T.K.; Gilfillan, S.; Colonna, M. Humanized TREM2 mice reveal microglia-intrinsic and -extrinsic effects of R47H polymorphism. J Exp Med 2018, 215, 745–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wu, K.; Byers, D.E.; Jin, X.; Agapov, E.; Alexander-Brett, J.; Patel, A.C.; Cella, M.; Gilfilan, S.; Colonna, M.; Kober, D.L.; et al. TREM-2 promotes macrophage survival and lung disease after respiratory viral infection. J Exp Med 2015, 212, 681–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Park, S.-H.; Lee, E.-H.; Kim, H.-J.; Jo, S.; Lee, S.; Seo, S.W.; Park, H.-H.; Koh, S.-H.; Lee, J.-H. The relationship of soluble TREM2 to other biomarkers of sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Scientific Reports 2021, 11, 13050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Nabizadeh, F.; Seyedmirzaei, H.; Karami, S. Neuroimaging biomarkers and CSF sTREM2 levels in Alzheimer’s disease: a longitudinal study. Scientific Reports 2024, 14, 15318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wang, R.; Zhan, Y.; Zhu, W.; Yang, Q.; Pei, J. Association of soluble TREM2 with Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Jiao, L.; Yang, J.; Wang, W.; Liu, X.; Fu, Y.; Fan, D. sTREM2 cerebrospinal fluid levels are a potential biomarker in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and associate with UMN burden. Frontiers in Neurology, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Cooper-Knock, J.; Green, C.; Altschuler, G.; Wei, W.; Bury, J.J.; Heath, P.R.; Wyles, M.; Gelsthorpe, C.; Highley, J.R.; Lorente-Pons, A. A data-driven approach links microglia to pathology and prognosis in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Acta neuropathologica communications 2017, 5, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Gao, H.; Di, J.; Clausen, B.H.; Wang, N.; Zhu, X.; Zhao, T.; Chang, Y.; Pang, M.; Yang, Y.; He, R. Distinct myeloid population phenotypes dependent on TREM2 expression levels shape the pathology of traumatic versus demyelinating CNS disorders. Cell Reports 2023, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Paloneva, J.; Manninen, T.; Christman, G.; Hovanes, K.; Mandelin, J.; Adolfsson, R.; Bianchin, M.; Bird, T.; Miranda, R.; Salmaggi, A.; et al. Mutations in Two Genes Encoding Different Subunits of a Receptor Signaling Complex Result in an Identical Disease Phenotype. The American Journal of Human Genetics 2002, 71, 656–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Paloneva, J.; Mandelin, J.; Kiialainen, A.; Böhling, T.; Prudlo, J.; Hakola, P.; Haltia, M.; Konttinen, Y.T.; Peltonen, L. DAP12/TREM2 deficiency results in impaired osteoclast differentiation and osteoporotic features. The Journal of experimental medicine 2003, 198, 669–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhou, Y.; Tada, M.; Cai, Z.; Andhey, P.S.; Swain, A.; Miller, K.R.; Gilfillan, S.; Artyomov, M.N.; Takao, M.; Kakita, A.; et al. Human early-onset dementia caused by DAP12 deficiency reveals a unique signature of dysregulated microglia. Nature Immunology 2023, 24, 545–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Guerreiro, R.; Wojtas, A.; Bras, J.; Carrasquillo, M.; Rogaeva, E.; Majounie, E.; Cruchaga, C.; Sassi, C.; Kauwe, J.S.; Younkin, S. TREM2 variants in Alzheimer’s disease. New England Journal of Medicine 2013, 368, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Jonsson, T.; Stefansson, H.; Steinberg, S.; Jonsdottir, I.; Jonsson, P.V.; Snaedal, J.; Bjornsson, S.; Huttenlocher, J.; Levey, A.I.; Lah, J.J. Variant of TREM2 associated with the risk of Alzheimer’s disease. New England Journal of Medicine 2013, 368, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Zhu, B.; Liu, Y.; Hwang, S.; Archuleta, K.; Huang, H.; Campos, A.; Murad, R.; Piña-Crespo, J.; Xu, H.; Huang, T.Y. Trem2 deletion enhances tau dispersion and pathology through microglia exosomes. Molecular Neurodegeneration 2022, 17, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Popescu, A.S.; Butler, C.A.; Allendorf, D.H.; Piers, T.M.; Mallach, A.; Roewe, J.; Reinhardt, P.; Cinti, A.; Redaelli, L.; Boudesco, C.; et al. Alzheimer’s disease-associated R47H TREM2 increases, but wild-type TREM2 decreases, microglial phagocytosis of synaptosomes and neuronal loss. Glia 2023, 71, 974–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zhou, S.L.; Tan, C.C.; Hou, X.H.; Cao, X.P.; Tan, L.; Yu, J.T. TREM2 Variants and Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Alzheimers Dis 2019, 68, 1171–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Krasemann, S.; Madore, C.; Cialic, R.; Baufeld, C.; Calcagno, N.; El Fatimy, R.; Beckers, L.; O’Loughlin, E.; Xu, Y.; Fanek, Z.; et al. The TREM2-APOE Pathway Drives the Transcriptional Phenotype of Dysfunctional Microglia in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Immunity 2017, 47, 566–581.e569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Gratuze, M.; Leyns, C.E.G.; Holtzman, D.M. New insights into the role of TREM2 in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurodegener 2018, 13, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Rayaprolu, S.; Mullen, B.; Baker, M.; Lynch, T.; Finger, E.; Seeley, W.W.; Hatanpaa, K.J.; Lomen-Hoerth, C.; Kertesz, A.; Bigio, E.H. TREM2 in neurodegeneration: evidence for association of the p. R47H variant with frontotemporal dementia and Parkinson’s disease. Molecular neurodegeneration 2013, 8, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Cady, J.; Koval, E.D.; Benitez, B.A.; Zaidman, C.; Jockel-Balsarotti, J.; Allred, P.; Baloh, R.H.; Ravits, J.; Simpson, E.; Appel, S.H. TREM2 variant p. R47H as a risk factor for sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. JAMA neurology 2014, 71, 449–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Peplonska, B.; Berdynski, M.; Mandecka, M.; Barczak, A.; Kuzma-Kozakiewicz, M.; Barcikowska, M.; Zekanowski, C. TREM2 variants in neurodegenerative disorders in the Polish population. Homozygosity and compound heterozygosity in FTD patients. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration 2018, 19, 407–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Kang, S.S.; Kurti, A.; Baker, K.E.; Liu, C.-C.; Colonna, M.; Ulrich, J.D.; Holtzman, D.M.; Bu, G.; Fryer, J.D. Behavioral and transcriptomic analysis of Trem2-null mice: not all knockout mice are created equal. Human molecular genetics 2018, 27, 211–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Filipello, F.; Morini, R.; Corradini, I.; Zerbi, V.; Canzi, A.; Michalski, B.; Erreni, M.; Markicevic, M.; Starvaggi-Cucuzza, C.; Otero, K. The microglial innate immune receptor TREM2 is required for synapse elimination and normal brain connectivity. Immunity 2018, 48, 979–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Tagliatti, E.; Desiato, G.; Mancinelli, S.; Bizzotto, M.; Gagliani, M.C.; Faggiani, E.; Hernández-Soto, R.; Cugurra, A.; Poliseno, P.; Miotto, M.; et al. Trem2 expression in microglia is required to maintain normal neuronal bioenergetics during development. Immunity 2024, 57, 86–105.e109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Schmid, C.D.; Sautkulis, L.N.; Danielson, P.E.; Cooper, J.; Hasel, K.W.; Hilbush, B.S.; Sutcliffe, J.G.; Carson, M.J. Heterogeneous expression of the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-2 on adult murine microglia. J Neurochem 2002, 83, 1309–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Forabosco, P.; Ramasamy, A.; Trabzuni, D.; Walker, R.; Smith, C.; Bras, J.; Levine, A.P.; Hardy, J.; Pocock, J.M.; Guerreiro, R.; et al. Insights into TREM2 biology by network analysis of human brain gene expression data. Neurobiology of Aging 2013, 34, 2699–2714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Leyns, C.E.; Ulrich, J.D.; Finn, M.B.; Stewart, F.R.; Koscal, L.J.; Remolina Serrano, J.; Robinson, G.O.; Anderson, E.; Colonna, M.; Holtzman, D.M. TREM2 deficiency attenuates neuroinflammation and protects against neurodegeneration in a mouse model of tauopathy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2017, 114, 11524–11529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Leyns, C.E.; Gratuze, M.; Narasimhan, S.; Jain, N.; Koscal, L.J.; Jiang, H.; Manis, M.; Colonna, M.; Lee, V.M.; Ulrich, J.D. TREM2 function impedes tau seeding in neuritic plaques. Nature neuroscience 2019, 22, 1217–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Skarnes, W.C.; Rosen, B.; West, A.P.; Koutsourakis, M.; Bushell, W.; Iyer, V.; Mujica, A.O.; Thomas, M.; Harrow, J.; Cox, T.; et al. A conditional knockout resource for the genome-wide study of mouse gene function. Nature 2011, 474, 337–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Shaw, B.C.; Snider, H.C.; Turner, A.K.; Zajac, D.J.; Simpson, J.F.; Estus, S.; Combs, C. An Alternatively Spliced TREM2 Isoform Lacking the Ligand Binding Domain is Expressed in Human Brain. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease 2022, 87, 1647–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Brierley, J.B. The penetration of particulate matter from the cerebrospinal fluid into the spinal ganglia, peripheral nerves, and perivascular spaces of the central nervous system. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1950, 13, 203–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Devor, M. Unexplained peculiarities of the dorsal root ganglion. PAIN 1999, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Nagashima, K.; Oota, K. A HISTOPATHOLOGICAL STUDY OF THE HUMAN SPINAL GANGLIA. NORMAL VARIATIONS IN AGING. Acta Patholigica Japonica 1974, 24, 333–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Tandrup, T. Unbiased estimates of number and size of rat dorsal root ganglion cells in studies of structure and cell survival. Journal of neurocytology 2004, 33, 173–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. West, C.A.; McKay Hart, A.; Terenghi, G.; Wiberg, M. Sensory neurons of the human brachial plexus: a quantitative study employing optical fractionation and in vivo volumetric magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery 2012, 70, 1183–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Haberberger, R.V.; Kuramatilake, J.; Barry, C.M.; Matusica, D. Ultrastructure of dorsal root ganglia. Cell Tissue Res 2023, 393, 17–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Avraham, O.; Feng, R.; Ewan, E.E.; Rustenhoven, J.; Zhao, G.; Cavalli, V. Profiling sensory neuron microenvironment after peripheral and central axon injury reveals key pathways for neural repair. eLife 2021, 10, e68457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Feringa, E.R.; Lee, G.W.; Vahlsing, H.L.; Gilbertie, W.J. Cell death in the adult rat dorsal root ganglion after hind limb amputation, spinal cord transection, or both operations. Exp Neurol 1985, 87, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Lu, S. Single-cell transcriptome analyses of dorsal root ganglia in aged hyperlipidemic mice. lmu, 2023.
  110. Li, X.; Zhuang, Z.; Hao, Y.; Lin, S.; Gu, J.; Chang, S.; Lan, L.; Zhao, G.; Zhang, D. Paeonol Relieves Chronic Neuropathic Pain by Reducing Communication Between Schwann Cells and Macrophages in the Dorsal Root Ganglia After Injury. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2025, 26, 3964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Qu, Y.; Cai, R.; Li, Q.; Wang, H.; Lu, L. Neuroinflammation signatures in dorsal root ganglia following chronic constriction injury. Heliyon 2024, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Yu, X.; Liu, H.; Hamel, K.A.; Morvan, M.G.; Yu, S.; Leff, J.; Guan, Z.; Braz, J.M.; Basbaum, A.I. Dorsal root ganglion macrophages contribute to both the initiation and persistence of neuropathic pain. Nat Commun 2020, 11, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Feng, R.; Muraleedharan Saraswathy, V.; Mokalled, M.H.; Cavalli, V. Self-renewing macrophages in dorsal root ganglia contribute to promote nerve regeneration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2023, 120, e2215906120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Brown, A.G. Organization in the spinal cord: the anatomy and physiology of identified neurones; Springer Science & Business Media: 2012.
  115. Fowler, C.J.; Griffiths, D.; De Groat, W.C. The neural control of micturition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2008, 9, 453–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Kuru, M. Nervous control of micturition. Physiological Reviews 1965, 45, 425–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Uher, E.-M.; Swash, M. Sacral reflexes: physiology and clinical application. Diseases of the colon & rectum 1998, 41, 1165–1177. [Google Scholar]
  118. Diaz, E.; Morales, H. Spinal Cord Anatomy and Clinical Syndromes. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI 2016, 37, 360–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Cramer, G.D.; Darby, S.A. Clinical anatomy of the spine, spinal cord, and ANS. 2013.
  120. Green, T.R.; Rowe, R.K. Quantifying microglial morphology: an insight into function. Clinical and experimental immunology 2024, 216, 221–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Vidal-Itriago, A.; Radford, R.A.; Aramideh, J.A.; Maurel, C.; Scherer, N.M.; Don, E.K.; Lee, A.; Chung, R.S.; Graeber, M.B.; Morsch, M. Microglia morphophysiological diversity and its implications for the CNS. Frontiers in immunology 2022, 13, 997786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Edler, M.K.; Mhatre-Winters, I.; Richardson, J.R. Microglia in Aging and Alzheimer’s Disease: A Comparative Species Review. Cells 2021, 10, 1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Pottorf, T.S.; Lane, E.L.; Haley-Johnson, Z.; Amores-Sanchez, V.; Ukmar, D.N.; Correa-Torres, P.M.; Alvarez, F.J. Dual Role of Microglial TREM2 in Neuronal Degeneration and Regeneration After Axotomy. bioRxiv, 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Hakim, R.; Zachariadis, V.; Sankavaram, S.R.; Han, J.; Harris, R.A.; Brundin, L.; Enge, M.; Svensson, M. Spinal Cord Injury Induces Permanent Reprogramming of Microglia into a Disease-Associated State Which Contributes to Functional Recovery. J Neurosci 2021, 41, 8441–8459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Keren-Shaul, H.; Spinrad, A.; Weiner, A.; Matcovitch-Natan, O.; Dvir-Szternfeld, R.; Ulland, T.K.; David, E.; Baruch, K.; Lara-Astaiso, D.; Toth, B. A unique microglia type associated with restricting development of Alzheimer’s disease. Cell 2017, 169, 1276–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Samant, R.R.; Standaert, D.G.; Harms, A.S. The emerging role of disease-associated microglia in Parkinson’s disease. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Xie, M.; Zhao, S.; Bosco, D.B.; Nguyen, A.; Wu, L.J. Microglial TREM2 in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Developmental neurobiology 2022, 82, 125–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Wang, H. Microglia heterogeneity in Alzheimer’s disease: insights from single-cell technologies. Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience 2021, 13, 773590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Deczkowska, A.; Keren-Shaul, H.; Weiner, A.; Colonna, M.; Schwartz, M.; Amit, I. Disease-associated microglia: a universal immune sensor of neurodegeneration. Cell 2018, 173, 1073–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Zhou, Y.; Song, W.M.; Andhey, P.S.; Swain, A.; Levy, T.; Miller, K.R.; Poliani, P.L.; Cominelli, M.; Grover, S.; Gilfillan, S.; et al. Human and mouse single-nucleus transcriptomics reveal TREM2-dependent and TREM2-independent cellular responses in Alzheimer’s disease. Nature Medicine 2020, 26, 131–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Lambert, J.-C.; Ibrahim-Verbaas, C.A.; Harold, D.; Naj, A.C.; Sims, R.; Bellenguez, C.; Jun, G.; DeStefano, A.L.; Bis, J.C.; Beecham, G.W. Meta-analysis of 74,046 individuals identifies 11 new susceptibility loci for Alzheimer’s disease. Nature genetics 2013, 45, 1452–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Song, W.M.; Colonna, M. The identity and function of microglia in neurodegeneration. Nature immunology 2018, 19, 1048–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. McQuade, A.; Kang, Y.J.; Hasselmann, J.; Jairaman, A.; Sotelo, A.; Coburn, M.; Shabestari, S.K.; Chadarevian, J.P.; Fote, G.; Tu, C.H.; et al. Gene expression and functional deficits underlie TREM2-knockout microglia responses in human models of Alzheimer’s disease. Nature Communications 2020, 11, 5370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Ennerfelt, H.; Frost, E.L.; Shapiro, D.A.; Holliday, C.; Zengeler, K.E.; Voithofer, G.; Bolte, A.C.; Lammert, C.R.; Kulas, J.A.; Ulland, T.K. SYK coordinates neuroprotective microglial responses in neurodegenerative disease. Cell 2022, 185, 4135–4152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Matteoli, M. The role of microglial TREM2 in development: A path toward neurodegeneration? Glia 2024, 72, 1544–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Jay, T.R.; von Saucken, V.E.; Muñoz, B.; Codocedo, J.F.; Atwood, B.K.; Lamb, B.T.; Landreth, G.E. TREM2 is required for microglial instruction of astrocytic synaptic engulfment in neurodevelopment. Glia 2019, 67, 1873–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Vecchiarelli, H.A.; Bisht, K.; Sharma, K.; Weiser Novak, S.; Traetta, M.E.; Garcia-Segura, M.E.; St-Pierre, M.-K.; Savage, J.C.; Willis, C.; Picard, K. Dark Microglia Are Abundant in Normal Postnatal Development, where they Remodel Synapses via Phagocytosis and Trogocytosis, and Are Dependent on TREM2. bioRxiv, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  138. St-Pierre, M.-K.; Šimončičová, E.; Bögi, E.; Tremblay, M.-È. Shedding light on the dark side of the microglia. ASN neuro 2020, 12, 1759091420925335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Stephan, A.H.; Barres, B.A.; Stevens, B. The complement system: an unexpected role in synaptic pruning during development and disease. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2012, 35, 369–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Schafer, D.P.; Lehrman, E.K.; Kautzman, A.G.; Koyama, R.; Mardinly, A.R.; Yamasaki, R.; Ransohoff, R.M.; Greenberg, M.E.; Barres, B.A.; Stevens, B. Microglia sculpt postnatal neural circuits in an activity and complement-dependent manner. Neuron 2012, 74, 691–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Duffy, A.S.; Eyo, U.B. Microglia and Astrocytes in Postnatal Neural Circuit Formation. Glia 2025, 73, 232–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Scott-Hewitt, N.; Perrucci, F.; Morini, R.; Erreni, M.; Mahoney, M.; Witkowska, A.; Carey, A.; Faggiani, E.; Schuetz, L.T.; Mason, S.; et al. Local externalization of phosphatidylserine mediates developmental synaptic pruning by microglia. Embo j 2020, 39, e105380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Shen, Y.; Lue, L.-F.; Yang, L.-B.; Roher, A.; Kuo, Y.-M.; Strohmeyer, R.; Goux, W.J.; Lee, V.; Johnson, G.V.; Webster, S.D. Complement activation by neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroscience letters 2001, 305, 165–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Jiang, H.; Burdick, D.; Glabe, C.G.; Cotman, C.W.; Tenner, A.J. beta-Amyloid activates complement by binding to a specific region of the collagen-like domain of the C1q A chain. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md.: 1950) 1994, 152, 5050–5059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Rogers, J.; Cooper, N.R.; Webster, S.; Schultz, J.; McGeer, P.L.; Styren, S.D.; Civin, W.H.; Brachova, L.; Bradt, B.; Ward, P. Complement activation by beta-amyloid in Alzheimer disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1992, 89, 10016–10020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Zhong, L.; Sheng, X.; Wang, W.; Li, Y.; Zhuo, R.; Wang, K.; Zhang, L.; Hu, D.-D.; Hong, Y.; Chen, L. TREM2 receptor protects against complement-mediated synaptic loss by binding to complement C1q during neurodegeneration. Immunity 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Rueda-Carrasco, J.; Sokolova, D.; Lee, S.E.; Childs, T.; Jurčáková, N.; Crowley, G.; De Schepper, S.; Ge, J.Z.; Lachica, J.I.; Toomey, C.E.; et al. Microglia-synapse engulfment via PtdSer-TREM2 ameliorates neuronal hyperactivity in Alzheimer’s disease models. Embo j 2023, 42, e113246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Fracassi, A.; Marcatti, M.; Tumurbaatar, B.; Woltjer, R.; Moreno, S.; Taglialatela, G. TREM2-induced activation of microglia contributes to synaptic integrity in cognitively intact aged individuals with Alzheimer’s neuropathology. Brain Pathol 2023, 33, e13108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Dejanovic, B.; Wu, T.; Tsai, M.C.; Graykowski, D.; Gandham, V.D.; Rose, C.M.; Bakalarski, C.E.; Ngu, H.; Wang, Y.; Pandey, S.; et al. Complement C1q-dependent excitatory and inhibitory synapse elimination by astrocytes and microglia in Alzheimer’s disease mouse models. Nat Aging 2022, 2, 837–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Das, M.; Mao, W.; Voskobiynyk, Y.; Necula, D.; Lew, I.; Petersen, C.; Zahn, A.; Yu, G.Q.; Yu, X.; Smith, N.; et al. Alzheimer risk-increasing TREM2 variant causes aberrant cortical synapse density and promotes network hyperexcitability in mouse models. Neurobiol Dis 2023, 186, 106263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Freria, C.M.; Brennan, F.H.; Sweet, D.R.; Guan, Z.; Hall, J.C.; Kigerl, K.A.; Nemeth, D.P.; Liu, X.; Lacroix, S.; Quan, N. Serial Systemic Injections of Endotoxin (LPS) Elicit Neuroprotective Spinal Cord Microglia through IL-1-Dependent Cross Talk with Endothelial Cells. Journal of Neuroscience 2020, 40, 9103–9120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Cserép, C.; Pósfai, B.; Lénárt, N.; Fekete, R.; László, Z.I.; Lele, Z.; Orsolits, B.; Molnár, G.; Heindl, S.; Schwarcz, A.D.; et al. Microglia monitor and protect neuronal function through specialized somatic purinergic junctions. Science 2020, 367, 528–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Inoue, K.; Tsuda, M. Microglia in neuropathic pain: cellular and molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2018, 19, 138–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Tozaki-Saitoh, H.; Takeda, H.; Inoue, K. The Role of Microglial Purinergic Receptors in Pain Signaling. Molecules 2022, 27, 1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Tozaki-Saitoh, H.; Tsuda, M.; Miyata, H.; Ueda, K.; Kohsaka, S.; Inoue, K. P2Y12 receptors in spinal microglia are required for neuropathic pain after peripheral nerve injury. Journal of Neuroscience 2008, 28, 4949–4956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Tsuda, M.; Masuda, T.; Kitano, J.; Shimoyama, H.; Tozaki-Saitoh, H.; Inoue, K. IFN-γ receptor signaling mediates spinal microglia activation driving neuropathic pain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2009, 106, 8032–8037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Masuda, T.; Ozono, Y.; Mikuriya, S.; Kohro, Y.; Tozaki-Saitoh, H.; Iwatsuki, K.; Uneyama, H.; Ichikawa, R.; Salter, M.W.; Tsuda, M. Dorsal horn neurons release extracellular ATP in a VNUT-dependent manner that underlies neuropathic pain. Nature Communications 2016, 7, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Boakye, P.A.; Tang, S.-J.; Smith, P.A. Mediators of Neuropathic Pain; Focus on Spinal Microglia, CSF-1, BDNF, CCL21, TNF-α, Wnt Ligands, and Interleukin 1β. Frontiers in Pain Research 2021, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Sideris-Lampretsas, G.; Malcangio, M. Microglial heterogeneity in chronic pain. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity 2021, 96, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Yu, X.; Basbaum, A.; Guan, Z. Contribution of colony-stimulating factor 1 to neuropathic pain. Pain Reports 2021, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Kohno, K.; Tsuda, M. Role of microglia and P2 × 4 receptors in chronic pain. Pain Reports 2021, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Donnelly, C.R.; Andriessen, A.S.; Chen, G.; Wang, K.; Jiang, C.; Maixner, W.; Ji, R.-R. Central nervous system targets: glial cell mechanisms in chronic pain. Neurotherapeutics 2020, 17, 846–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Salter, M.W.; Beggs, S. Sublime microglia: expanding roles for the guardians of the CNS. Cell 2014, 158, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Ferrini, F.; De Koninck, Y. Microglia control neuronal network excitability via BDNF signalling. Neural Plasticity 2013, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Malcangio, M.; Sideris-Lampretsas, G. How microglia contribute to the induction and maintenance of neuropathic pain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2025, 26, 263–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Long, J.; Tian, G.; He, K.; Su, Y.; Wang, Z.; Huang, L.; Yao, Y.; Li, X.; Lin, Y. The role of microglia in neuropathic pain: A systematic review of animal experiments. Brain Research Bulletin 2025, 111410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Kobayashi, M.; Konishi, H.; Sayo, A.; Takai, T.; Kiyama, H. TREM2/DAP12 signal elicits proinflammatory response in microglia and exacerbates neuropathic pain. Journal of Neuroscience 2016, 36, 11138–11150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Wang, Y.; Shi, Y.; Huang, Y.; Liu, W.; Cai, G.; Huang, S.; Zeng, Y.; Ren, S.; Zhan, H.; Wu, W. Resveratrol mediates mechanical allodynia through modulating inflammatory response via the TREM2-autophagy axis in SNI rat model. J Neuroinflammation 2020, 17, 311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Yousefpour, N.; Locke, S.; Deamond, H.; Wang, C.; Marques, L.; St-Louis, M.; Ouellette, J.; Khoutorsky, A.; De Koninck, Y.; Ribeiro-da-Silva, A. Time-dependent and selective microglia-mediated removal of spinal synapses in neuropathic pain. Cell Reports 2023, 42, 112010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Kohno, K.; Shirasaka, R.; Yoshihara, K.; Mikuriya, S.; Tanaka, K.; Takanami, K.; Inoue, K.; Sakamoto, H.; Ohkawa, Y.; Masuda, T.; et al. A spinal microglia population involved in remitting and relapsing neuropathic pain. Science 2022, 376, 86–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Tsuda, M.; Masuda, T.; Kohno, K. Microglial diversity in neuropathic pain. Trends in Neurosciences 2023, 46, 597–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Kamphuis, W.; Kooijman, L.; Schetters, S.; Orre, M.; Hol, E.M. Transcriptional profiling of CD11c-positive microglia accumulating around amyloid plaques in a mouse model for Alzheimer’s disease. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-molecular basis of Disease 2016, 1862, 1847–1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Fiore, N.T.; Yin, Z.; Guneykaya, D.; Gauthier, C.D.; Hayes, J.P.; D’Hary, A.; Butovsky, O.; Moalem-Taylor, G. Sex-specific transcriptome of spinal microglia in neuropathic pain due to peripheral nerve injury. Glia 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Le, Y.; Tang, S.-q.; He, W.-y.; He, J.; Wang, Y.-h.; Wang, H. Contribution of Trem2 signaling to the development of painful diabetic neuropathy by mediating microglial polarization in mice. 2021.
  175. Guruprasad, B.; Chaudhary, P.; Choedon, T.; Kumar, V.L. Artesunate ameliorates functional limitations in Freund’s complete adjuvant-induced monoarthritis in rat by maintaining oxidative homeostasis and inhibiting COX-2 expression. Inflammation 2015, 38, 1028–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Zhang, L.; Zhao, Y.; Gao, T.; Zhang, H.; Li, J.; Wang, G.; Wang, C.; Li, Y. Artesunate reduces remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia and peroxiredoxin-3 hyperacetylation via modulating spinal metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 in rats. Neuroscience 2022, 487, 88–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Zhang, L.; Li, N.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Y.; Gao, T.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, G.; Yu, Y.; Wang, C.; Li, Y. Artesunate therapy alleviates fracture-associated chronic pain after orthopedic surgery by suppressing CCL21-dependent TREM2/DAP12 inflammatory signaling in mice. Frontiers in Pharmacology 2022, 13, 894963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Uzun, T.; Toptas, O.; Saylan, A.; Carver, H.; Turkoglu, S.A. Evaluation and Comparison of the Effects of Artesunate, Dexamethasone, and Tacrolimus on Sciatic Nerve Regeneration. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2019, 77, 1092.e1091–1092.e1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Ji, X.-T.; Qian, N.-S.; Zhang, T.; Li, J.-M.; Li, X.-K.; Wang, P.; Zhao, D.-S.; Huang, G.; Zhang, L.; Fei, Z. Spinal astrocytic activation contributes to mechanical allodynia in a rat chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain model. PloS one 2013, 8, e60733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Hu, L.-Y.; Zhou, Y.; Cui, W.-Q.; Hu, X.-M.; Du, L.-X.; Mi, W.-L.; Chu, Y.-X.; Wu, G.-C.; Wang, Y.-Q.; Mao-Ying, Q.-L. Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) dependent microglial activation promotes cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy in mice. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity 2018, 68, 132–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Mannelli, L.D.C.; Pacini, A.; Micheli, L.; Tani, A.; Zanardelli, M.; Ghelardini, C. Glial role in oxaliplatin-induced neuropathic pain. Experimental neurology 2014, 261, 22–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Pevida, M.; Lastra, A.; Hidalgo, A.; Baamonde, A.; Menéndez, L. Spinal CCL2 and microglial activation are involved in paclitaxel-evoked cold hyperalgesia. Brain research bulletin 2013, 95, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Zheng, F.; Xiao, W.-H.; Bennett, G. The response of spinal microglia to chemotherapy-evoked painful peripheral neuropathies is distinct from that evoked by traumatic nerve injuries. Neuroscience 2011, 176, 447–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Rotterman, T.M.; MacPherson, K.P.; Tansey, M.G.; Alvarez, F.J. Motor circuit synaptic plasticity after peripheral nerve injury depends on a central neuroinflammatory response and a CCR2 mechanism Journal of Neuroscience 2018, In revision, JN-RM-2945-17.
  185. Rotterman, T.M.; Haley-Johnson, Z.; Pottorf, T.S.; Chopra, T.; Chang, E.; Zhang, S.; McCallum, W.M.; Fisher, S.; Franklin, H.; Alvarez, M. Modulation of central synapse remodeling after remote peripheral injuries by the CCL2-CCR2 axis and microglia. Cell reports 2024, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Rotterman, T.M.; García, V.V.; Housley, S.N.; Nardelli, P.; Sierra, R.; Fix, C.E.; Cope, T.C. Structural preservation does not ensure function at sensory Ia–motoneuron synapses following peripheral nerve injury and repair. Journal of Neuroscience 2023, 43, 4390–4404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Rotterman, T.M.; Alvarez, F.J. Microglia dynamics and interactions with motoneurons axotomized after nerve injuries revealed by two-photon imaging. Scientific Reports 2020, 10, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Rotterman, T.M.; Akhter, E.T.; Lane, A.R.; MacPherson, K.P.; García, V.V.; Tansey, M.G.; Alvarez, F.J. Spinal Motor Circuit Synaptic Plasticity after Peripheral Nerve Injury Depends on Microglia Activation and a CCR2 Mechanism. The Journal of Neuroscience 2019, 39, 3412–3433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Manich, G.; Gómez-López, A.R.; Almolda, B.; Villacampa, N.; Recasens, M.; Shrivastava, K.; González, B.; Castellano, B. Differential Roles of TREM2+ Microglia in Anterograde and Retrograde Axonal Injury Models. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience 2020, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Kobayashi, M.; Konishi, H.; Takai, T.; Kiyama, H. A DAP12-dependent signal promotes pro-inflammatory polarization in microglia following nerve injury and exacerbates degeneration of injured neurons. Glia 2015, 63, 1073–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Lieberman, A. The axon reaction: a review of the principal features of perikaryal responses to axon injury. International review of neurobiology 1971, 14, 49–124. [Google Scholar]
  192. Fu, S.Y.; Gordon, T. The cellular and molecular basis of peripheral nerve regeneration. Molecular neurobiology 1997, 14, 67–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Castro, R.W.; Lopes, M.C.; De Biase, L.M.; Valdez, G. Aging spinal cord microglia become phenotypically heterogeneous and preferentially target motor neurons and their synapses. Glia 2024, 72, 206–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Castro, R.W.; Lopes, M.C.; Settlage, R.E.; Valdez, G. Aging alters mechanisms underlying voluntary movements in spinal motor neurons of mice, primates, and humans. JCI Insight 2023, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. You, J.; Youssef, M.M.; Santos, J.R.; Lee, J.; Park, J. Microglia and astrocytes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: disease-associated states, pathological roles, and therapeutic potential. Biology 2023, 12, 1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Clarke, B.E.; Patani, R. The microglial component of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain : a journal of neurology 2020, 143, 3526–3539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Brites, D.; Vaz, A.R. Microglia centered pathogenesis in ALS: insights in cell interconnectivity. Frontiers in cellular neuroscience 2014, 8, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Henkel, J.S.; Beers, D.R.; Zhao, W.; Appel, S.H. Microglia in ALS: the good, the bad, and the resting. Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology 2009, 4, 389–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Dols-Icardo, O.; Montal, V.; Sirisi, S.; López-Pernas, G.; Cervera-Carles, L.; Querol-Vilaseca, M.; Muñoz, L.; Belbin, O.; Alcolea, D.; Molina-Porcel, L. Motor cortex transcriptome reveals microglial key events in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation 2020, 7, e829. [Google Scholar]
  200. Chen, L.-X.; Zhang, M.-D.; Xu, H.-F.; Ye, H.-Q.; Chen, D.-F.; Wang, P.-S.; Bao, Z.-W.; Zou, S.-M.; Lv, Y.-T.; Wu, Z.-Y. Single-Nucleus RNA Sequencing Reveals the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Disease-Associated Microglia in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Research 2024, 7, 0548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Tam, O.H.; Rozhkov, N.V.; Shaw, R.; Kim, D.; Hubbard, I.; Fennessey, S.; Propp, N.; Phatnani, H.; Kwan, J.; Sareen, D.; et al. Postmortem Cortex Samples Identify Distinct Molecular Subtypes of ALS: Retrotransposon Activation, Oxidative Stress, and Activated Glia. Cell Reports 2019, 29, 1164–1177.e1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Jauregui, C.; Blanco-Luquin, I.; Macías, M.; Roldan, M.; Caballero, C.; Pagola, I.; Mendioroz, M.; Jericó, I. Exploring the Disease-Associated microglia state in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 2994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Maniatis, S.; Äijö, T.; Vickovic, S.; Braine, C.; Kang, K.; Mollbrink, A.; Fagegaltier, D.; Andrusivová, Ž.; Saarenpää, S.; Saiz-Castro, G.; et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of molecular pathology in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Science 2019, 364, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Sreedharan, J.; Blair, I.P.; Tripathi, V.B.; Hu, X.; Vance, C.; Rogelj, B.; Ackerley, S.; Durnall, J.C.; Williams, K.L.; Buratti, E.; et al. TDP-43 Mutations in Familial and Sporadic Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Science 2008, 319, 1668–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Prasad, A.; Bharathi, V.; Sivalingam, V.; Girdhar, A.; Patel, B.K. Molecular mechanisms of TDP-43 misfolding and pathology in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Frontiers in molecular neuroscience 2019, 12, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Scotter, E.L.; Chen, H.-J.; Shaw, C.E. TDP-43 proteinopathy and ALS: insights into disease mechanisms and therapeutic targets. Neurotherapeutics 2015, 12, 352–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Waters, R.; Adkins, R.; Yakura, J. Definition of complete spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 1991, 29, 573–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Stauffer, E.S. Diagnosis and prognosis of acute cervical spinal cord injury. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1975, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Klose, K.J.; Green, B.A.; Smith, R.S.; Adkins, R.H.; MacDonald, A.M. University of Miami Neuro-Spinal Index (UMNI): a quantitative method for determining spinal cord function. Paraplegia 1980, 18, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Maynard Jr, F.M.; Bracken, M.B.; Creasey, G.; Ditunno Jr, J.F.; Donovan, W.H.; Ducker, T.B.; Garber, S.L.; Marino, R.J.; Stover, S.L.; Tator, C.H. International standards for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. Spinal cord 1997, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Cheriyan, T.; Ryan, D.; Weinreb, J.; Cheriyan, J.; Paul, J.; Lafage, V.; Kirsch, T.; Errico, T. Spinal cord injury models: a review. Spinal cord 2014, 52, 588–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Hall, M. Second Memoir on some principles of the pathology of the nervous system. Medico-chirurgical transactions 1840, 23, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Ko, H.Y. Revisit Spinal Shock: Pattern of Reflex Evolution during Spinal Shock. Korean J Neurotrauma 2018, 14, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Bastian, H.C. On the symptomatology of total transverse lesions of the spinal cord; with special reference to the condition of the various reflexes. Medico-chirurgical transactions 1890, 73, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Silva, N.A.; Sousa, N.; Reis, R.L.; Salgado, A.J. From basics to clinical: a comprehensive review on spinal cord injury. Progress in neurobiology 2014, 114, 25–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Lindan, R.; Joiner, E.; Freehafer, A.; Hazel, C. Incidence and clinical features of autonomic dysreflexia in patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal cord 1980, 18, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Widerström-Noga, E.G.; Felipe-Cuervo, E.; Yezierski, R.P. Relationships among clinical characteristics of chronic pain after spinal cord injury. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2001, 82, 1191–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Oyinbo, C. Secondary injury mechanisms in traumatic spinal cord injury: a nugget of this multiply cascade. Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis 2011, 71, 281–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Ahuja, C.S.; Wilson, J.R.; Nori, S.; Kotter, M.; Druschel, C.; Curt, A.; Fehlings, M.G. Traumatic spinal cord injury. Nature reviews Disease primers 2017, 3, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Tator, C.H.; Fehlings, M.G. Review of the secondary injury theory of acute spinal cord trauma with emphasis on vascular mechanisms. Journal of neurosurgery 1991, 75, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Brennan, F.H.; Li, Y.; Wang, C.; Ma, A.; Guo, Q.; Li, Y.; Pukos, N.; Campbell, W.A.; Witcher, K.G.; Guan, Z.; et al. Microglia coordinate cellular interactions during spinal cord repair in mice. Nature Communications 2022, 13, 4096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Swarts, E.A.; Brennan, F.H. Evolving insights on the role of microglia in neuroinflammation, plasticity, and regeneration of the injured spinal cord. Frontiers in Immunology 2025, 16, 1621789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Kroner, A.; Almanza, J.R. Role of microglia in spinal cord injury. Neuroscience letters 2019, 709, 134370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Zhou, X.; He, X.; Ren, Y. Function of microglia and macrophages in secondary damage after spinal cord injury. Neural regeneration research 2014, 9, 1787–1795. [Google Scholar]
  225. Brockie, S.; Hong, J.; Fehlings, M.G. The role of microglia in modulating neuroinflammation after spinal cord injury. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2021, 22, 9706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. David, S.; Kroner, A. Repertoire of microglial and macrophage responses after spinal cord injury. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2011, 12, 388–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Xu, L.; Wang, J.; Ding, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhu, Y.-J. Current knowledge of microglia in traumatic spinal cord injury. Frontiers in neurology 2022, 12, 796704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Brockie, S.; Zhou, C.; Fehlings, M.G. Resident immune responses to spinal cord injury: role of astrocytes and microglia. Neural Regeneration Research 2024, 19, 1678–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Zha, X.; Zheng, G.; Skutella, T.; Kiening, K.; Unterberg, A.; Younsi, A. Microglia: a promising therapeutic target in spinal cord injury. Neural regeneration research 2025, 20, 454–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Zhao, T.; Di, J.; Kang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Yao, S.; Liu, B.; Rong, L. TREM2 Impedes Recovery After Spinal Cord Injury by Regulating Microglial Lysosomal Membrane Permeabilization-Mediated Autophagy. Cell Proliferation 2025, e70047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Burgess, M.; Wicks, K.; Gardasevic, M.; Mace, K.A. Cx3CR1 expression identifies distinct macrophage populations that contribute differentially to inflammation and repair. Immunohorizons 2019, 3, 262–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Lee, M.; Lee, Y.; Song, J.; Lee, J.; Chang, S.-Y. Tissue-specific role of CX3CR1 expressing immune cells and their relationships with human disease. Immune network 2018, 18, e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Jung, S.; Aliberti, J.; Graemmel, P.; Sunshine, M.J.; Kreutzberg, G.W.; Sher, A.; Littman, D.R. Analysis of fractalkine receptor CX3CR1 function by targeted deletion and green fluorescent protein reporter gene insertion. Molecular and Cellular Biology 2000, 20, 4106–4114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Flores, A.J.; Lavemia, C.; Owens, P.W. Anatomy and physiology of peripheral nerve injury and repair. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDICS-BELLE MEAD- 2000, 29, 167–178. [Google Scholar]
  235. Geuna, S.; Raimondo, S.; Ronchi, G.; Di Scipio, F.; Tos, P.; Czaja, K.; Fornaro, M. Histology of the peripheral nerve and changes occurring during nerve regeneration. International review of neurobiology 2009, 87, 27–46. [Google Scholar]
  236. Boissaud-Cooke, M.; Pidgeon, T.E.; Tunstall, R. Chapter 37 - The Microcirculation of Peripheral Nerves: The Vasa Nervorum. In Nerves and Nerve Injuries, Tubbs, R.S., Rizk, E., Shoja, M.M., Loukas, M., Barbaro, N., Spinner, R.J., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, 2015; pp. 507–523. [Google Scholar]
  237. Appenzeller, O.; Dhital, K.K.; Cowen, T.; Burnstock, G. The nerves to blood vessels supplying blood to nerves: the innervation of vasa nervorum. Brain Research 1984, 304, 383–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Sladjana, U.Z.; Ivan, J.D.; Bratislav, S.D. Microanatomical structure of the human sciatic nerve. Surgical and radiologic anatomy 2008, 30, 619–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Brosius Lutz, A.; Lucas, T.A.; Carson, G.A.; Caneda, C.; Zhou, L.; Barres, B.A.; Buckwalter, M.S.; Sloan, S.A. An RNA-sequencing transcriptome of the rodent Schwann cell response to peripheral nerve injury. Journal of Neuroinflammation 2022, 19, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Gerber, D.; Pereira, J.A.; Gerber, J.; Tan, G.; Dimitrieva, S.; Yángüez, E.; Suter, U. Transcriptional profiling of mouse peripheral nerves to the single-cell level to build a sciatic nerve ATlas (SNAT). Elife 2021, 10, e58591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Wang, P.L.; Yim, A.K.; Kim, K.-W.; Avey, D.; Czepielewski, R.S.; Colonna, M.; Milbrandt, J.; Randolph, G.J. Peripheral nerve resident macrophages share tissue-specific programming and features of activated microglia. Nature communications 2020, 11, 2552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Wang, P.L. Peripheral Nerve Macrophages and Their Implications in Neuroimmunity. Washington University in St. Louis, 2021.
  243. Tsuchiya, T.; Miyawaki, S.; Teranishi, Y.; Ohara, K.; Hirano, Y.; Ogawa, S.; Torazawa, S.; Sakai, Y.; Hongo, H.; Ono, H.; et al. Current molecular understanding of central nervous system schwannomas. Acta Neuropathologica Communications 2025, 13, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Baruah, P.; Mahony, C.; Marshall, J.L.; Smith, C.G.; Monksfield, P.; Irving, R.I.; Dumitriu, I.E.; Buckley, C.D.; Croft, A.P. Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis of vestibular schwannoma reveals functionally distinct macrophage subsets. British Journal of Cancer 2024, 130, 1659–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Katzenelenbogen, Y.; Sheban, F.; Yalin, A.; Yofe, I.; Svetlichnyy, D.; Jaitin, D.A.; Bornstein, C.; Moshe, A.; Keren-Shaul, H.; Cohen, M. Coupled scRNA-Seq and intracellular protein activity reveal an immunosuppressive role of TREM2 in cancer. Cell 2020, 182, 872–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Nakamura, K.; Smyth, M.J. TREM2 marks tumor-associated macrophages. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 2020, 5, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Fu, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Guo, L.; Liu, Y. Identification of key genes and immune infiltration based on weighted gene co-expression network analysis in vestibular schwannoma. Medicine 2023, 102, e33470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Olsson, Y.; Sjöstrand, J. Origin of macrophages in Wallerian degeneration of peripheral nerves demonstrated autoradiographically. Experimental Neurology 1969, 23, 102–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Monaco, S.; Gehrmann, J.; Raivich, G.; Kreutzberg, G.W. MHC-positive, ramified macrophages in the normal and injured rat peripheral nervous system. J Neurocytol 1992, 21, 623–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Chen, P.; Piao, X.; Bonaldo, P. Role of macrophages in Wallerian degeneration and axonal regeneration after peripheral nerve injury. Acta Neuropathologica 2015, 130, 605–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Cattin, A.-L.; Burden, J.J.; Van Emmenis, L.; Mackenzie, F.E.; Hoving, J.J.; Calavia, N.G.; Guo, Y.; McLaughlin, M.; Rosenberg, L.H.; Quereda, V. Macrophage-induced blood vessels guide Schwann cell-mediated regeneration of peripheral nerves. Cell 2015, 162, 1127–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Gordon, T. Peripheral Nerve Regeneration and Muscle Reinnervation. Int J Mol Sci 2020, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Chen, B.; Chen, Q.; Parkinson, D.B.; Dun, X.-p. Analysis of Schwann cell migration and axon regeneration following nerve injury in the sciatic nerve bridge. Frontiers in molecular neuroscience 2019, 12, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Witzel, C.; Rohde, C.; Brushart, T.M. Pathway sampling by regenerating peripheral axons. Journal of Comparative Neurology 2005, 485, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Tomlinson, J.E.; Žygelytė, E.; Grenier, J.K.; Edwards, M.G.; Cheetham, J. Temporal changes in macrophage phenotype after peripheral nerve injury. Journal of neuroinflammation 2018, 15, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Rios, R.; Jablonka-Shariff, A.; Broberg, C.; Snyder-Warwick, A.K. Macrophage roles in peripheral nervous system injury and pathology: Allies in neuromuscular junction recovery. Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience 2021, 111, 103590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Ydens, E.; Cauwels, A.; Asselbergh, B.; Goethals, S.; Peeraer, L.; Lornet, G.; Almeida-Souza, L.; Van Ginderachter, J.A.; Timmerman, V.; Janssens, S. Acute injury in the peripheral nervous system triggers an alternative macrophage response. Journal of neuroinflammation 2012, 9, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Shiraishi, W.; Yamasaki, R.; Hashimoto, Y.; Ko, S.; Kobayakawa, Y.; Isobe, N.; Matsushita, T.; Kira, J.-i. Clearance of peripheral nerve misfolded mutant protein by infiltrated macrophages correlates with motor neuron disease progression. Scientific reports 2021, 11, 16438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Graber, D.J.; Hickey, W.F.; Harris, B.T. Progressive changes in microglia and macrophages in spinal cord and peripheral nerve in the transgenic rat model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Journal of neuroinflammation 2010, 7, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Kano, O.; Beers, D.R.; Henkel, J.S.; Appel, S.H. Peripheral nerve inflammation in ALS mice: cause or consequence. Neurology 2012, 78, 833–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  261. Martínez-Muriana, A.; Mancuso, R.; Francos-Quijorna, I.; Olmos-Alonso, A.; Osta, R.; Perry, V.H.; Navarro, X.; Gomez-Nicola, D.; López-Vales, R. CSF1R blockade slows the progression of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis by reducing microgliosis and invasion of macrophages into peripheral nerves. Scientific reports 2016, 6, 25663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  262. Chiot, A.; Zaïdi, S.; Iltis, C.; Ribon, M.; Berriat, F.; Schiaffino, L.; Jolly, A.; de la Grange, P.; Mallat, M.; Bohl, D. Modifying macrophages at the periphery has the capacity to change microglial reactivity and to extend ALS survival. Nature neuroscience 2020, 23, 1339–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Msheik, Z.; El Massry, M.; Rovini, A.; Billet, F.; Desmoulière, A. The macrophage: a key player in the pathophysiology of peripheral neuropathies. Journal of Neuroinflammation 2022, 19, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. MacIntosh, B.R.; Gardiner, P.F.; McComas, A.J. Skeletal muscle: form and function; Human kinetics: 2006.
  265. Lieber, R.L. Skeletal muscle structure, function, and plasticity; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: 2002.
  266. Liddel, E.; Sherrington, C. Reflexes in response to stretch (myotatic reflexes). Proceedings of the Royal Society, London, series B 1924, 96, 212–242. [Google Scholar]
  267. Eccles, J.; Eccles, R.M.; Lundberg, A. Synaptic actions on motoneurones caused by impulses in Golgi tendon organ afferents. The Journal of Physiology 1957, 138, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  268. Mendell, L.M.; Henneman, E. Terminals of single Ia fibers: location, density, and distribution within a pool of 300 homonymous motoneurons. Journal of Neurophysiology 1971, 34, 171–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  269. Bączyk, M.; Manuel, M.; Roselli, F.; Zytnicki, D. Diversity of Mammalian Motoneurons and Motor Units. In Vertebrate Motoneurons; Springer: 2022; pp. 131-150.
  270. Kernell, D. The Motoneurone and its Muscle Fibres; Oxford University Press UK: 2006.
  271. Manuel, M.; Zytnicki, D. Alpha, beta and gamma motoneurons: functional diversity in the motor system’s final pathway. Journal of integrative neuroscience 2011, 10, 243–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  272. Alhindi, A.; Boehm, I.; Forsythe, R.O.; Miller, J.; Skipworth, R.J.E.; Simpson, H.; Jones, R.A.; Gillingwater, T.H. Terminal Schwann cells at the human neuromuscular junction. Brain Commun 2021, 3, fcab081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  273. Balice-Gordon, R.J. Schwann cells: Dynamic roles at the neuromuscular junction. Current Biology 1996, 6, 1054–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  274. Hastings, R.L.; Valdez, G. Origin, identity, and function of terminal Schwann cells. Trends in Neurosciences 2024, 47, 432–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. Hastings, R.L.; Mikesh, M.; Lee, Y.i.; Thompson, W.J. Morphological remodeling during recovery of the neuromuscular junction from terminal Schwann cell ablation in adult mice. Scientific Reports 2020, 10, 11132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  276. Muir, A.; Kanji, A.; Allbrook, D. The structure of the satellite cells in skeletal muscle. Journal of anatomy 1965, 99, 435. [Google Scholar]
  277. Mauro, A. Satellite cell of skeletal muscle fibers. The Journal of biophysical and biochemical cytology 1961, 9, 493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Rubenstein, A.B.; Smith, G.R.; Raue, U.; Begue, G.; Minchev, K.; Ruf-Zamojski, F.; Nair, V.D.; Wang, X.; Zhou, L.; Zaslavsky, E.; et al. Single-cell transcriptional profiles in human skeletal muscle. Scientific Reports 2020, 10, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. De Micheli, A.J.; Spector, J.A.; Elemento, O.; Cosgrove, B.D. A reference single-cell transcriptomic atlas of human skeletal muscle tissue reveals bifurcated muscle stem cell populations. Skeletal Muscle 2020, 10, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Kang, H.; Tian, L.; Mikesh, M.; Lichtman, J.W.; Thompson, W.J. Terminal Schwann Cells Participate in Neuromuscular Synapse Remodeling during Reinnervation following Nerve Injury. The Journal of Neuroscience 2014, 34, 6323–6333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Reynolds, M.; Woolf, C. Terminal Schwann cells elaborate extensive processes following denervation of the motor endplate. Journal of neurocytology 1992, 21, 50–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Bermedo-García, F.; Zelada, D.; Martínez, E.; Tabares, L.; Henríquez, J.P. Functional regeneration of the murine neuromuscular synapse relies on long-lasting morphological adaptations. BMC Biology 2022, 20, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  283. Son, Y.-J.; Thompson, W.J. Schwann cell processes guide regeneration of peripheral axons. Neuron 1995, 14, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  284. Yin, P.; Chen, M.; Rao, M.; Lin, Y.; Zhang, M.; Xu, R.; Hu, X.; Chen, R.; Chai, W.; Huang, X. Deciphering immune landscape remodeling unravels the underlying mechanism for synchronized muscle and bone aging. Advanced Science 2024, 11, 2304084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  285. Larouche, J.A.; Wallace, E.C.; Spence, B.D.; Buras, E.; Aguilar, C.A. Spatiotemporal mapping of immune and stem cell dysregulation after volumetric muscle loss. JCI insight 2023, 8, e162835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  286. Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Alabdullatif, S.; Homma, S.T.; Alekseyev, Y.O.; Zhou, L. Expansion and pathogenic activation of skeletal muscle–resident macrophages in mdx5cv/Ccr2−/− mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2025, 122, e2410095122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  287. Essex, A.L.; Huot, J.R.; Deosthale, P.; Wagner, A.; Figueras, J.; Davis, A.; Damrath, J.; Pin, F.; Wallace, J.; Bonetto, A.; et al. Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cells 2 (TREM2) R47H Variant Causes Distinct Age- and Sex-Dependent Musculoskeletal Alterations in Mice. J Bone Miner Res 2022, 37, 1366–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  288. Tacconi, S.; Giudetti, A.M.; Blangero, F.; Meugnier, E.; El-jaafari, A.; Longo, S.; Angilé, F.; Fanizzi, F.P.; Canaple, L.; Jalabert, A.; et al. LAM/TREM2 <sup>+</sup> macrophages release extracellular vesicles and extracellular lipid droplets which modulate the phenotype of recipient macrophages and homeostasis of skeletal muscle cells. bioRxiv, 6349; .12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. Lu, C.-Y.; Santosa, K.B.; Jablonka-Shariff, A.; Vannucci, B.; Fuchs, A.; Turnbull, I.; Pan, D.; Wood, M.D.; Snyder-Warwick, A.K. Macrophage-derived vascular endothelial growth factor-A is integral to neuromuscular junction reinnervation after nerve injury. Journal of Neuroscience 2020, 40, 9602–9616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  290. Van Dyke, J.M.; Smit-Oistad, I.M.; Macrander, C.; Krakora, D.; Meyer, M.G.; Suzuki, M. Macrophage-mediated inflammation and glial response in the skeletal muscle of a rat model of familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Experimental neurology 2016, 277, 275–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  291. Chiu, I.M.; Phatnani, H.; Kuligowski, M.; Tapia, J.C.; Carrasco, M.A.; Zhang, M.; Maniatis, T.; Carroll, M.C. Activation of innate and humoral immunity in the peripheral nervous system of ALS transgenic mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2009, 106, 20960–20965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  292. Dachs, E.; Hereu, M.; Piedrafita, L.; Casanovas, A.; Calderó, J.; Esquerda, J.E. Defective neuromuscular junction organization and postnatal myogenesis in mice with severe spinal muscular atrophy. Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology 2011, 70, 444–461. [Google Scholar]
  293. Deczkowska, A.; Weiner, A.; Amit, I. The Physiology, Pathology, and Potential Therapeutic Applications of the TREM2 Signaling Pathway. Cell 2020, 181, 1207–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Chtarto, A.; Humbert-Claude, M.; Bockstael, O.; Das, A.T.; Boutry, S.; Breger, L.S.; Klaver, B.; Melas, C.; Barroso-Chinea, P.; Gonzalez-Hernandez, T. A regulatable AAV vector mediating GDNF biological effects at clinically-approved sub-antimicrobial doxycycline doses. Molecular therapy Methods & clinical development 2016, 3. [Google Scholar]
  295. Zhou, L.; Wang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, C. A comprehensive review of AAV-mediated strategies targeting microglia for therapeutic intervention of neurodegenerative diseases. Journal of Neuroinflammation 2024, 21, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  296. Masoudi, N.; Willen, J.; Daniels, C.; Jenkins, B.A.; Furber, E.C.; Kothiya, M.; Banjoko, M.B.; Gowda, R.; Hendricks, J.; Fang, Y.-Y.; et al. Microglial-targeted Gene Therapy: Developing a Disease Modifying Treatment for ALSP Associated with CSF1R Mutations (ALSP-CSF1R) (P11-4.012). Neurology 2024, 102, 3061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated