Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Influence of Incubation Time for Correctness of Viability Assessment of Ascaris suum Eggs – Attempts to Optimise the Parasitological Examination

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

13 August 2025

Posted:

13 August 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the optimal incubation time for accurate assessment of parasitic nematode eggs viability, an important step in improving parasitological diagnostics. The experiment used Ascaris suum eggs were collected from three sources: adult roundworms uteri (U), pig faeces (F) and sewage sludge (S), then incubated at 27°C and monitored weekly. Eggs were classified as dead (with clear deformations), viable (with motile larvae) or of uncertain viability (retaining structural integrity but undeveloped). The results showed that eggs from group U had the highest viability (96%) and developed larvae within 3 weeks. In contrast, group F (52% viability) and S (3% viability) showed delayed development, requiring up to 8-12 weeks for a conclusive viability assessment. These results indicate significant differences in egg viability depending on the sample source and emphasise the need for longer incubation times, particularly for environmental samples such as sewage sludge. The study also highlights the limitations of single time point assessments based solely on egg structure, which can lead to misclassification. In conclusion, prolonged incubation improves diagnostic accuracy by allowing a clearer distinction between viable and non-viable eggs, especially in samples with initially uncertain viability.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

The regulations in the EU and in Polish law impose an obligation to assess the sanitary condition of organic fertilizer and arable land fertilized with such substances [1,2,3]. One of the indicators of the hygienic condition of soils and organic fertilisers is the presence of live intestinal parasites eggs of the genus Ascaris, Toxocara and Trichuris [4,5].
Diagnostics of a parasitic infection in humans or animals by the detection parasite developmental stages, e.g., eggs in faeces, is considered the most common and relatively reliable diagnostic method [6]. In routine diagnostics (e.g., coproscopic methods) the viability of helminth eggs is irrelevant, as the presence of unfertilised or dead eggs in faeces also confirms the presence of invasion. However, in the parasitological analysis of sewage sludge, soil or organic fertilisers, it is also necessary to determine the viability of the eggs. This is because the purpose of testing these materials is to assess the risk to human and animal health.
Laboratories use various parasitological methods to assess the viability of intestinal parasite eggs , which can generally be classified into three groups:
  • Methods based on the staining of eggs with fluorescent dyes (e.g., LIVE/DEAD BacLight Bacterial Viability KitLIVE) [7,8,9].
  • Methods involving a visual assessment of the integrity of the internal structures of the eggs without an incubation process (e.g., the triple flotation method ANFOR XP X33-017) [10,11,12,13].
  • Methods involving incubation of eggs and periodic observation of changes in their internal structures [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21].
Each of these methods has advantages and limitations. Methods based on egg staining are highly sensitive and are particularly suitable for assessing the viability of eggs isolated from the uteri of adult female nematodes. However, in the case of eggs from sewage sludge, staining results may be inconclusive. This is due to the possible staining of bacteria that inhabit the surface of the eggs, which can interfere with proper analysis [7,9]. Methods relying solely on visual assessment of the internal structures of eggs are fast. However, they carry a high risk of error. Although they only require a single observation under the microscope, they are prone to misdiagnosis. According to our observations, dead eggs can retain normal structural features for a long period of time, making an accurate assessment of viability difficult. Conversely, methods based on incubation and microscopic evaluation offer greater certainty of classification by observing embryo degradation or development during incubation. However, they are also susceptible to misclassification because the development or degradation of helminths eggs can be very slow (e.g., eggs obtained from sewage sludge). The generally accepted incubation conditions (3 weeks at 27°C) may not be adequate in such cases.
Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the necessary incubation time required for an accurate and efficient assessment of the viability of intestinal nematode of (Ascaris suum) eggs. This parasite was chosen due to the frequent occurrence of its eggs in fertilisers, sewage sludge, wastewater and soil [22,23,24]. It was also chosen because eggs and adult forms are easily obtained for experiments.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Parasite Eggs

The experiment utilized Ascaris suum eggs collected from three sources: adult nematodes uteri (U), pig faeces (F) and sewage sludge (S).

2.2. The Process of Obtaining Eggs from the Uterus of Mature Female Nematodes (U)

Adult female A. suum nematodes were harvested from the intestines of naturally infected pigs at a slaughterhouse. Then the eggs were isolated from the terminal segment of the uterus. This isolation was carried out according to our own procedure. Using surgical instruments, the entire uterus was carefully extracted from the nematodes. The distal uterine segments, which measured between 1.5 and 2 cm in length, were then passed through a sieve with sieve opening 1 mm to pre-clean the egg suspension. The eggs were then placed in distilled water using a pipette and sonicated for 15 minutes in an ultrasonic cleaner to break up any conglomerates. The resulting suspension was stirred with a magnetic stirrer for 10 minutes. After adding a 1% formaldehyde solution, the suspension was stored at approximately 4 °C for no longer than seven days prior to the experiment.

2.3. The Process of Isolating Eggs from Pig Faeces (F)

The eggs were isolated from the faeces of pigs infected with these parasites through flotation using a saturated magnesium sulphate (MgSO₄) solution combined with centrifugation (own method). The faecal sample was thoroughly mixed with the saturated MgSO₄ solution (specific gravity 1.28) and filtered through a 200 µm sieve. It was then centrifuged for 10 minutes at 2500 g. After centrifugation, the upper portion of the supernatant was carefully poured into a glass beaker and the eggs were transferred using a pipette to a Petri dishes containing distilled water and 1% formaldehyde solution. The resulting suspension was stored at approximately 4 °C for no longer than seven days prior to the experiment.

2.4. The Process of Isolating Eggs from Dewatered Sewage Sludge Obtained from a Wastewater Treatment Plant (S)

The isolation of eggs from dewatered sewage sludge obtained immediately after dehydration from a municipal wastewater treatment plant in Poland was conducted using own method previously described [19] and standardised as PN-Z-19005:2018-10 [19]. The sample was mechanically mixed with a 0.0025% Tween 20 solution for four hours and then filtered through a 200 µm sieve. The filtrate then underwent centrifugation for 10 minutes at 2500 g, after which the supernatant was removed. The resulting precipitate was then mixed with saturated sodium nitrate (NaNO₃) (specific gravity 1.35) and subjected to another round of centrifugation for 10 minutes at 2500 g, after which it was sedimented in distilled water for 1.5 hours. After sedimentation, the precipitate containing the isolated eggs (in distilled water and a 1% formaldehyde solution) was stored at approximately 4 °C for no longer than seven days prior to the experiment [21].

2.5. Experiment: Estimation of Egg Viability

Isolated eggs were transferred separately into 95 mm diameter Petri dishes containing 1% formaldehyde solution using an automatic pipette (200 eggs per dish).
Three types of cultures were prepared:
  • 12 plates with eggs isolated from the uterus of adult female Ascaris suum (group U),
  • 12 plates with eggs isolated from pig faeces (group F),
  • 12 plates with eggs isolated from sewage sludge (group S).
After distribution of the eggs into Petri dishes, an initial viability observation was made using a stereoscopic microscope (40-100x magnification). The Petri dishes were then placed in a thermostat and incubated at a temperature range of 26-28 °C. The level of the solution in the dish was marked with a pen to provide a reference point. 1% formaldehyde solution were added to maintain the desired level in case of evaporation. Based on our observations [21] and the current standards [19,20] and literature [14,25], a temperature of 26-28 °C was selected for this study. The incubator’s temperature was monitored and recorded daily, and the suspensions in the dishes were mixed by hand to allow oxygenation to proceed. The plates were observed weekly for 12 weeks. The necessary incubation time was defined as the time required for all eggs of uncertain viability to disappear from the pool of incubated eggs (i.e., to develop or degrade).
At each observation, from 200 eggs placed on each plate 100 (being a representative sample) were counted and observed and classified into one of three categories:
  • eggs with clear deformations (such as granular appearance, deformed cytoplasm, damaged shell or empty shell) were classified as dead eggs (DE),
  • eggs in which motile larvae had developed were classified as live eggs (LE),
  • eggs that retained correct structural features but did not show signs of embryo development (such as cleavage or larval development) were classified as eggs of questionable viability (QE).
Eggs containing a non-motile larva that was observed to degrade during incubation were also considered dead. In the following weeks of observation, the percentages of each egg class were calculated. These percentages included eggs from various sources (U, F, S) categorised into different classes (QE, LE, DE) at each survey date for comparison.
The time required to correctly assess egg viability was the time when all incubated QE eggs could be classified as LE or DE class.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis of the results was performed using STATISTICA 13 software (StatSoft, Poland). Multiple regression models were applied to estimate interactions between the proportions of QE, LE, and DE eggs over time.
The normality of variable distributions in the uterus (U), faeces (F), and sludge (S) groups was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Since the assumption of normality was not met, a non-parametric rank-based MultiANOVA test was used for further comparisons.
To identify statistically significant differences between the groups, Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference (HSD) post hoc test was applied. A significance level of α = 0.05 was adopted for all statistical procedures.
Additionally, Z-scores and Student’s t-tests were calculated to evaluate whether the week-to-week changes in the proportion of each egg category (QE, LE, DE) were statistically significant in relation to the group means. These tests allowed us to determine whether the observed dynamics were the result of real effects rather than random variation.

3. Results

The average percentage of eggs of each class (QE, LE, DE) obtained from different sources (U, F, S) observed during the following weeks of incubation, are presented in Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3.
The average percentages of eggs in each class are shown in Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3 for easy comparison.
The data presented in Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3 and Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3 show that all three types of eggs — QE (questionable eggs), LE (eggs with live larvae), and DE (degraded eggs) — were found in samples taken from the roundworms uterus, faeces and sewage sludge. However, the dynamics of their appearance varied significantly between the groups.
At the initial observation point (day 0), only QE and DE eggs were present. Among eggs from the uterus, 98% were classified as QE on average, compared to 90% for eggs from faeces and 79% for eggs from sludge. Conversely, DE eggs were most prevalent in the S group (21%) and least prevalent in the U group (2%). No LE eggs were observed in any group at this stage.
LE eggs were first detected in the second week of incubation on plates containing eggs isolated from A. suum uteri (84% of the total pool of observed eggs). The high proportion of eggs indicates a rapid increase in larval development during the second week. A similar trend was observed one week later in the faecal group, where the percentage of LE eggs increased from 0% to 42%. On plates containing eggs isolated from sewage sludge, the first appearance of LE eggs occurred in the fourth week, with only isolated cases being observed (2%).
In group U, the percentage of eggs containing live larvae remained high for 3–4 weeks (84%, 94%, 84% and 82%), before declining steadily as the larvae died inside the eggs. By week 11, the average had fallen to 2%, and LE eggs were no longer observed by week 12.
Group F followed a similar pattern with LE eggs remaining relatively stable over 3–4 weeks (42%, 46%, 52%, 40%) before declining systematically. By week 11, the average was 2%, dropping to 0% by week 12.
For eggs obtained from sewage sludge, the average percentage of LE eggs remained low following their appearance in week 4, peaking at just 3%. This level was maintained for five weeks, with the eggs disappearing completely by week 11.
Eggs classified as dead (DE) included those with abnormal structure showing signs of degeneration, as well as those in which larval death had occurred. Relatively few such eggs were observed at the first observation (day 0), particularly in groups U (2%) and F (10%), while 21% were found in group S.
At subsequent observation dates, the percentage of eggs classified as DE increased gradually. The slowest increase was observed in group U, while the fastest increase was observed in group S.
In group S, the percentage of such eggs reached 77% after four weeks of incubation. In groups U and F, it was 16% and 36%, respectively, at the same time point. More than 90% of the DE eggs in groups U, F and S were observed from weeks 10, 9 and 7 respectively. By week 12, almost all the eggs in all the groups were classified as DE.
However, for the purposes of this experiment, the most important class of eggs for diagnostics was defined as QE. Eggs in this group present a particular diagnostic challenge as it is not possible to definitively assess their viability by microscopic examination.
An increase in the number of LE and DE class eggs is accompanied by a systematic decrease in the number of QE class eggs. The most pronounced decrease in QE eggs was observed in group U, where none of these eggs were present by week 3. Tukey’s post hoc test showed that the p-values for the comparisons between week III and subsequent weeks (IV–XII) were all greater than 0.05 (p = 1.00000), indicating no significant change. In group F, the decrease was slower and QE eggs were not found until week 8 of incubation. All p-values for comparisons between week VIII and weeks IX–XII (Tukey’s HSD test) also exceeded 0.05 (p = 1.00000), suggesting that there was no statistical significance in this phase of incubation. In group S, the decrease in the percentage of QE eggs was even slower, with only a few of these eggs being found from week 10 onwards. However, most of the p-values calculated for comparisons between week VII and subsequent weeks (weeks VIII–XII) were greater than 0.05, often reaching a value of approximately 1.00000. This suggests that there were no significant statistical differences in these comparisons. Additionally, the most significant decrease in QE eggs occurred during the first four weeks of incubation across all groups (U, F and S).
A sharp and statistically significant decline in the percentage of QE eggs observed in both the U and F groups (p = 0), was confirmed by strongly negative Z-scores and high absolute t-values. Concurrently, a large increase in the percentage of LE (which decreases in the later weeks of incubation) and DE eggs was recorded, with both of these trends also being statistically significant (p = 0). This was accompanied by strong positive shifts in statistical indicators.
By contrast, in the sewage sludge group, the decline in the number of QE eggs was gradual but statistically significant in almost all weeks, except week 4 where the analysis showed p=0.25. The lack of significance in week 4 indicates a temporary stabilisation of the decline in the percentage of these eggs. Conversely, statistical significance for LE eggs was only found in weeks 5–8 (by which time their percentage had reached 3%). The percentage of DE eggs increased statistically significantly throughout the incubation period, except in week 4 (p = 0.39), when growth slowed temporarily, as evidenced also by increasing Z-score and t-value.

4. Discussion

For the experiment the eggs of the species A. suum were selected. This decision was based on the common prevalence of these eggs in the environment (such as soil) [26,27], organic fertilisers [28], sewage sludge and digestates used for fertilisation purposes, as compared to eggs of other parasitic helminths [29,30]. In addition, the host of this parasite are pigs, which are commonly raised for meat production, making it relatively easy to obtain adult forms of nematodes [31,32,33]. In contrast, eggs and adult forms of other parasites described as indicators of sanitary status of fertilisers, sewage sludge or soil (such as Trichuris spp. and Toxocara spp.) are more challenging to obtain in large quantities. Toxocara roundworms, for example, are typically found in the intestines of carnivorous animals such as dogs and can only be obtained incidentally during necropsy of deceased animals. In contrast, the prevalence of Trichuris spp. infection in pigs is much lower than in the case of Ascaris spp. [34]. It is even more difficult to obtain eggs of these parasites from sewage sludge or organic fertilisers as they are rarely found in abundance in these matrices, and obtaining them in sufficient quantities for experiments such as ours is practically impossible. Zdybel et al. (2019) showed in their study, that eggs of nematodes belonging to the genera Toxocara and Trichuris are several times less abundant in sewage sludge than those of Ascaris spp. [29]. Similar results have also been reported by Horak P. in his study carried out in 1992 [35]. Therefore, only A. suum eggs were used in our study.
Methods verified under laboratory conditions were used to isolate eggs from sewage sludge and pig faeces. The isolation procedure was based on described in Zdybel et al. (2016) [21] and elements of the PN-Z-19005:2018-10 standard [19]. Validation of this method in our laboratory showed that none of its stages adversely affected the viability of eggs from parasites of the genera Ascaris, Trichuris and Toxocara. Additionally, storing the eggs at 4 °C for up to two weeks was found to stop their embryonic development without affecting their ability to develop further.
The method of counting eggs on plates during the experiment also requires clarification. Due to the eggs being suspended in the solution, it was not possible to record the position of each egg or track its development during subsequent observations. Therefore, a larger number of eggs were placed on each plate and treated as a population, from which a sample of 100 eggs was observed at specific intervals.
It is also worth noting that microscopic observations were not possible in the area immediately adjacent to the plate walls due to the formation of a meniscus. The introduction of representative sample analysis made it possible to overcome this technical limitation.
Based on the appearance of the different egg categories in our experiment, we identified three distinct periods: an initial period (day 0), during which the ratio of QE, LE and DE eggs illustrates their occurrence in a given matrix; a period during which larvae appeared and developed in the living eggs; and a period during which the larvae in the eggs died. Throughout the experiment, the percentage of QE eggs falls to values close to zero.
On the day 0 QE eggs and DE eggs were observed in all groups. However in group U only 2% of the eggs were classified as DE, whereas in group F this percentage was 10% and in group S even 21%. These differences in the percentages of QE and DE eggs between all groups can be attributed to the influence of environmental conditions. Eggs isolated from the uteri of adult female roundworms were not exposed to adverse negative external factors. The capacity of dead eggs observed in this group may be due to lack of fertilisation or natural death within the reproductive tract, possibly due to metabolic or genetic disorders [36,37]. Therefore, the percentage of eggs with questionable viability in this group was highest - 98%. The percentage of eggs classified as QE in group F was lower (90%). This difference may be explained by the fact that, after leaving the uteri of A. suum females, the eggs come into contact with the digestive system of the host where the presence of microorganisms (such as bacteria or protozoa), digestive enzymes or bile acid salts may have a detrimental effect on the eggs, particularly those with microdamage to the shell layers. However, it’s important to note that this explanation is based on our assumption, as there is no available literature data to support this hypothesis. On the contrary there are literature data suggesting that the passage of eggs through the digestive system confers properties of resistance to external environmental conditions and influences the normal development of the larvae [38] but this may only apply to eggs with an undamaged shell structure. It has also been reported that slurry itself has protective properties for Ascaris spp. eggs [39].
We observed significantly fewer QE eggs among those obtained from sewage sludge (79%). In this matrix, after leaving the uteri and surviving the pressures of the host digestive environment, parasite eggs are additionally exposed to sludge conditioning and hygienization processes, which may further reduce the proportion of eggs with a normal structure [5,40]. Literature reports also suggest that higher pH or increased ammonia levels (common in sewage sludge or organic waste treatment processes) can induce eggs destruction [41,42]. The negative impact of sewage treatment conditions on A. suum eggs is also indicated by the absence of class LE eggs in this group in the first weeks of the experiment, although the eggs remained in the treatment plant facilities for a relatively long period before being extracted for the experiment, which could be considered as their “natural incubation”.
The next stage in the incubation process that we identified was the emergence of eggs containing developing live larvae. The development of the larval form was observed in eggs obtained from all sources (U, F, S). The appearance of such eggs was accompanied by a decrease in QE egg percentage and a gradual increase in DE egg percentage (degradation of QE eggs). However, in each group there was a difference in the dynamics of the decrease or increase in the percentage of each egg class over the period.
The shortest time required for larvae development in eggs was observed in those isolated from the uteri of roundworms. Eggs classified as containing live larvae appeared between 1 and 2 weeks of incubation, with an average percentage of 84% at this time point. The highest percentage of eggs containing larvae (94%) was observed at week 3 of incubation.
There are data in the literature showing that eggs extracted from roundworm uteri may not exhibit normal embryogenesis and may not achieve full infectivity. It is suggested that these eggs may not be fully developed in terms of the composition of the outer egg shell and possibly other features acquired during normal egg excretion and subsequent passage through the host digestive system [43]. Our results did not confirm this data, as almost all eggs isolated from the uteri showed embryonic development. It is important to note that we only obtained eggs from the distal segment of the uteri of adult female roundworms, thereby reduced the problems associated with incomplete egg development. Similar observations to ours were reported by Geenen et al. in 1999 [44]. In their study, the larval form appeared in the eggs after 17-22 days of incubation, although at lower temperatures (18-22°C). They also presented data indicating that after 4 weeks of incubation, the majority of eggs contained mobile larvae, with less than 9% of eggs remaining unfertilised. Similarly, Maya et al. (2019) [45] conducted a study in which incubation was performed at temperatures of 28°C and 34°C. They reported that A. suum eggs developed into the larvae after 16-20 days, regardless of the incubation temperature. Furthermore, Jeska et al. (1986) [37] observed that 90% of the eggs contained larvae after 30-35 days. These results are consistent with our observations in the U group.
In eggs from pig faeces (group F), the first larvae were observed somewhat later, appearing between the 2nd and 3rd week of incubation. The highest percentage of eggs containing larvae was observed at week 5 (52%).
Similar experiments were carried out by Oksanen et al. (1990) [38]. These authors found, in agreement with our observations, that in A. suum eggs isolated from the uteri of adult roundworms and obtained from the faeces of infected pigs developed larvae in the third week of incubation. However, they observed that the percentage of eggs that developed into larvae-containing forms was similar in both groups (88-97%), whereas in the present study, only 52% of eggs isolated from faeces developed into larvae. Several factors could influence this difference, such as the housing conditions, the health status of the pigs from which the faeces were obtained, and their diet. Literature data suggest that the diet provided to the pigs can influence the pH level of the slurry. High pH levels can increase the inactivation of parasite eggs [46].
Eggs isolated from roundworm uteri and eggs obtained from pig faeces remain differently to eggs isolated from sewage sludge. In the last group, the larval forms appeared later, typically between the 3rd and 4th week of incubation. However, only 2-3% of the eggs developed into larval stage. Larvae were found up to the 10th week of incubation.
An analysis of the available literature show that no studies directly comparable to ours have been carried out, making it difficult to refer to the results of other researchers. However, it is highly probable that the delayed development of larval forms and their significantly lower percentage in sewage sludge samples can be attributed to the technological processes employed in wastewater treatment plants. Our own observations [5] support this assumption, indicating that such processes, especially anaerobic processes such as fermentation, as well as hygienization methods like liming or temperature treatment [47,48], can lead to embryo mortality in the majority of parasite eggs.
Simultaneously with the appearance of LE eggs and increase in the number of eggs classified as DE a natural reduction in the number of QE eggs was observed. Among the eggs obtained from the uteri, the number of eggs classified as QE decreased to 9% after the 2nd week of incubation (84% of these eggs developed into LE eggs, while 5% of the eggs were degraded). In eggs obtained from faeces, the percentage of QE eggs decreased to 21% after week 3 (42% of eggs developed into LE eggs and 27% of eggs were degraded). Conversely, in eggs isolated from sludge, this percentage was 22% after four weeks of incubation (in 2% of the eggs developed larvae and as many as 55% degraded).
The third stage highlighted in our experiment was the period when the larvae inside the eggs die and at the same time the percentage of QE and LE eggs decreases to values close to zero. A slow decrease in the percentage of eggs containing live larvae from the uteri was observed from the 4th week of incubation. This process continued over a nine-week period, with the percentage of eggs containing living larvae reaching 0% by week 12 of the experiment. In the case of eggs obtained from faeces, a decrease in the percentage of eggs containing live larvae was observed after week 6 and continued for seven weeks reaching 0% by week 12 of the experiment. In turn, the percentage of eggs containing live larvae in the eggs obtained from sewage sludge remained at 2-3% for another eight weeks before reaching 0% by week 11 of incubation.
It is surprising that the larvae in incubated eggs die off relatively quickly. The short survival of larvae observed in our study, up to 12 weeks, is difficult to compare with the survival of eggs in the natural environment. For example, the survival of Ascaris spp. eggs in soil has been reported for up to 10 years [49,50]. However, it’s important to note that in our experiment the eggs were still incubated at 27°C in distilled water after development into larvae. These conditions favour rapid development but not long survival and are very different from those found in the natural environment, such as slurry or soil.
It’s interesting to note that in group S, despite the low percentage of eggs in which larval development occurred, eggs with correct structure (as assessed microscopically) persisted for a relatively long time. This phenomenon could possibly be attributed to the physico-chemical and biological processes observed during sludge treatment. These factors could have led to embryo death within the eggs [5]. At the same time, however, they may have preserved the eggs in some way, perhaps by impregnation and inhibiting the degradation of structures inside the eggs shells, thus preventing visual detection of degeneration.
At the end of the discussion , based on the results obtained, we can draw the following practical conclusion from the statistical analysis: the lack of statistical significance in the weekly comparisons can be considered the point at which incubation ends, i.e., the time required to reliably assess egg viability. For group U it this will be the third week, for group F, the eight week; and for group S the seventh week of incubation. Although QE eggs were still present in group S up to week 11th, the lack of larval development in these eggs and the insignificant differences between weeks suggest that seven weeks can be considered the optimal incubation period for assessing viability.

5. Conclusions

Statistical analysis of our results confirmed that the changes in the U and F groups occurred rapidly and were statistically consistently, and were statistically significant, indicating that the experiment was conducted correctly. By contrast, development in the S group was delayed and less pronounced, suggesting an the adverse effect of environmental conditions on Ascaris suum larval development.
As shown in our study (both eggs observation and statistical analysis of the results), an incubation period of 3 weeks is sufficient to assess the viability of eggs isolated from roundworm uteri, which are unaffected by external environmental factors. However, for eggs obtained from faeces and sewage sludge, a much longer incubation period (minimum 7 - 8 weeks) is required for an accurate viability assessment. Therefore, there is a need to re-evaluate the parasitological methods used, especially for the analysis of organic fertilisers produced from sewage sludge, as well as sewage sludge when applied directly to soil, where determining the viability of the eggs found is crucial. That is a mistake to have such a short incubation period (as indicated in the standards) as it may lead to laboratories giving erroneous results. Therefore, it is suggested to significantly extend the incubation period in order to increase the reliability of the obtained results.
At the same time, it seems that methods of assessing eggs viability based on a single assessment of the integrity of the internal structures of the eggs (without incubation) should be rejected for such purposes. Our study suggests that viability assessment carried out in this way may be flawed.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: Preprints.org, Table S1. Statistical significance of differences in the percentage of A. suum eggs with normal structure (QE) obtained from sewage sludge (S) – Tukey post hoc test, Table S2. Statistical significance of differences in the percentage of A. suum eggs with normal structure (QE) obtained from pig faeces (F) – Tukey post hoc test, Table S3. Statistical significance of differences in the percentage of A. suum eggs with normal structure (QE) isolated from the uteri of adult female roundworms (U) – Tukey post hoc test, Table S4. Statistical significance of differences in the percentage of A. suum eggs containing live larvae (LE) obtained from sewage sludge (S) – Tukey post hoc test, Table S5. Statistical significance of differences in the percentage of A. suum eggs containing live larvae (LE) obtained from pig faeces (F) – Tukey post hoc test, Table S6. Statistical significance of differences in the percentage of A. suum eggs containing live larvae (LE) isolated from the uteri of adult female roundworms (U) – Tukey post hoc test, Table S7. Statistical significance of differences in the percentage of dead A. suum eggs (DE) obtained from sewage sludge (S) – Tukey post hoc test, Table S8. Statistical significance of differences in the percentage of dead A. suum eggs (DE) obtained from pig faeces (F) – Tukey post hoc test, Table S9. Statistical significance of differences in the percentage of dead A. suum eggs (DE) isolated from the uteri of adult female roundworms (U) – Tukey post hoc test.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.Z.; methodology, R.B. and J.Z.; formal analysis, R.B. and Z.O; investigation, R.B. and J.Z.; resources, E.B.Z.; data curation, R.B.; writing—original draft preparation, R.B.; writing—review and editing, E.B.Z., J.K., J.S., M.S., A.W.F. and T.C.; visualization, R.B., J.K. and Z.O.; supervision, T.C.; project administration, T.C.; funding acquisition, J.Z. and T.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Centre for Research and Development (Narodowe Centrum Badań i Rozwoju – NCBiR), Grant: GOSPOSTRATEG-III/0061/2020–00 OrgSafety: ‘Introduction of a innovative, cheap and environmentally-friendly method of hygienizing organic waste, enabling its use in fertilization’.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained in this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Regulation of the Polish Minister of Environment on the municipal sewage sludge. 2015, Gazette No. 257.
  2. Regulation of the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development on the implementation of certain provisions of the Act on Fertilizers and Fertilization. 2024, Gazette No. 1261.
  3. European Commission. Environmental, economic and social impacts of the use of sewage sludge on land. Consultation Report on Options and Impacts, Report by RPA, Milieu Ltd. and WRc for the European Commission, DG Environment, European Commission. 2009.
  4. World Health Organization. Guidelines for the Safe Use of Wastewater Excreta and Greywater; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
  5. Zdybel, J., Cencek, T., Karamon, J., Kłapeć, T. Effectiveness of selected stages of wastewater treatment in elimination of eggs of intestinal parasites. Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy. 2015, 59, 51-57. [CrossRef]
  6. Khurana, S., Singh, S., Mewara, A. Diagnostic Techniques for Soil-Transmitted Helminths - Recent Advances. Research and reports in tropical medicine. 2021, 12, 181–196. [CrossRef]
  7. Dąbrowska, J., Zdybel, J., Karamon, J., Kochanowski, M., Stojecki, K., Cencek, T., Kłapeć, T., Assessment of viability of the nematode eggs (Ascaris, Toxocara, Trichuris) in sewage sludge with the use of LIVE/DEAD Bacterial Viability Kit. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2014, 21(1), 35-41.
  8. Karkashan A., Khallaf B., Morris J., Thurbon N., Rouch D., Smith S.R., Deighton M. Comparison of methodologies for enumerating and detecting the viability of Ascaris eggs in sewage sludge by standard incubation-microscopy, the BacLight Live/Dead viability assay and other vital dyes. Water Research. 2015, 68, 533-544. [CrossRef]
  9. Włodarczyk M., Zdybel J., Próchniak M., Osiński Z., Karamon J., Kłapeć T., Cencek T. Viability assessment of Ascaris suum eggs stained with fluorescent dyes using digital colorimetric analysis. Experimental parasitology. 2017, 178, 7–13. [CrossRef]
  10. US. Environmental Protetcion Agency. Control of Pathogenes and Vector Attraction in Sewage Sludge. EPA/625/R-92-013 (Appendix I. Washington D.C). 1992.
  11. ANFOR XP X 33-017. Characterisation of Sludges e Enumeration and Viability of Parasite Helminth Eggs - Triple Flotation. Ed. Diffuse Par I’. Association Francaise de Normalisation (ANFOR). 2004.
  12. Raynaud J.P. Etude de l’efficacited’une technique de coproscopie quantitative pour le diagnostic de routine et le controle des infestations parasitaires des bovins, ovins, equines et porcins. Annales de Parasitologie (Paris). 1970, 45, 321–342.
  13. Cringoli G., Rinaldi L., Maurelli M.P., Utzinger J. FLOTAC: new multivalent techniques for qualitative and quantitative copromicroscopic diagnosis of parasites in animals and humans. Nat. Protoc. 2010, 5, 503–515.
  14. Vasilkova ZG, Gefter VA. Methods for studying soil for helminth eggs. Med Parasitol Parasitic Dis. 1948, 2, 139–43.
  15. Dada B.J. A new technique for the recovery of Toxocara eggs from soil. Journal of helminthology. 1979, 53(2), 141–144. [CrossRef]
  16. Quinn, R., Smith, H.V., Bruce, R.G., Girdwood, R.W. Studies on the incidence of Toxocara and Toxascaris spp. ova in the environment. 1. A comparison of flotation procedures for recovering Toxocara spp. ova from soil. The Journal of hygiene. 1980, 84(1), 83–89. [CrossRef]
  17. Gundłach J.L., Sadzikowski A.B., Tomczuk K. Contamination by Toxocara spp. eggs of selected urban and rural environments. Medycyna Weterynaryjna. 1996, 52, 395–396.
  18. Cruz, L. M., Allanson, M., Kwa, B., Azizan, A., Izurieta, R. Morphological changes of Ascaris spp. eggs during their development outside the host. The Journal of parasitology. 2012, 98(1), 63–68. [CrossRef]
  19. Polish Standardisation Committee PN-Z-19005:2018-10. Soil Quality- Evaluation of the Sanitary Condition of Materials Introduced into the Soil-Detection and Quantification of Intestinal Parasitic Eggs from the Genera Ascaris, Trichuris and Toxocara in Dehydrated Sewage Sludge, Intended for Introduction into the Soil.
  20. Polish Standardisation Committee PN-Z-19006:2023-04. Soil Quality- Evaluation of the Sanitary Condition of Materials Introduced into the Soil-Detection of Intestinal Parasitic Eggs from the Genera Ascaris, Trichuris and Toxocara in organic fertilisers.
  21. Zdybel J., Karamon J., Różycki M., Bilska-Zając E., Kłapeć T., Cencek T. Characterisation of a new, highly effective method for detecting nematode eggs (Ascaris spp., Toxocara spp., Trichuris spp.) in sewage sludge containing flocculants. Experimental Parasitology. 2016, 170, (198-206). [CrossRef]
  22. Maya C., Ortiz M., Jiménez B. Viability of Ascaris and other helminth genera non larval eggs in different conditions of temperature, lime (pH) and humidity. Water Sci Technol. 2010, 62 (11): 2616–2624. [CrossRef]
  23. Jimenez B. Helminth Ova Control in Wastewater and Sludge for Agricultural Reuse. In: W. O. K. Grabow, Ed., Water Reuse New Paradigm towards Integrated Water Resources Management in Encyclopedia of Biological, Physiological and Health Sciences. Water and Health. II. Life Support System, EOLSS Publishers Co Ltd., UNESCO, 2008, pp. 429-449.
  24. World Health Organization; Health Guidelines for the Use of Wastewater in Agriculture and Aquaculture. Technical Report. Series No 778. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1989.
  25. Arene FOI. Ascaris suum: Influence of embryonation temperature on the viability of the infective larva. J Thermal Biol. 1986, 11(1):9-15.
  26. Strauch D. Survival of pathogenic micro–organisms and parasites in excreta, manure and sewage sludge. Part I. Medycyna Weterynaryjna. 1993, 49, 59–65.
  27. Strauch D. Survival of pathogenic micro–organisms and parasites in excreta, manure and sewage sludge. Part II. Medycyna Weterynaryjna. 1993, 49, 117–121.
  28. Figura, A., Cencek, T., Żbikowska, E. Parasitic threat in commercial organic fertilizers. Parasitology research. 2022, 121(3), 945–949. [CrossRef]
  29. Zdybel J. ,Karamon J., Dąbrowska J., Różycki M., Bilska-Zając E., Kłapeć T, Cencek T. Parasitological contamination with eggs Ascaris spp., Trichuris spp. and Toxocara spp. of dehydrated municipal sewage sludge in Poland. Environmental Pollution. 2019, 248, 621-626. [CrossRef]
  30. Rocha, M.C.V.D., Barés, M.E., Braga, M.C.B. Quantification of viable helminth eggs in samples of sewage sludge. Water research. 2016, 103, 245–255. [CrossRef]
  31. Zhou C., Li M., Yuan K., Deng S., Peng W., , Pig Ascaris: an important source of human ascariasis in China. Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases. 2012, 12(6), 1172-1177. [CrossRef]
  32. Eijck, I. A., Borgsteede, F. H. A survey of gastrointestinal pig parasites on free-range, organic and conventional pig farms in The Netherlands. Veterinary research communications. 2005, 29(5), 407–414. [CrossRef]
  33. Szostak, B., Bekier-Jaworska, E. Microbiological and parasitological pollution of soil in the vicinity of swine farms. Medycyna Weterynaryjna. 2003, 59 (3), 251-254.
  34. Nejsum, P., Thamsborg, S. M., Petersen, H. H., Kringel, H., Fredholm, M., Roepstorff, A. Population dynamics of Trichuris suis in trickle-infected pigs. Parasitology. 2009, 136(6), 691–697. [CrossRef]
  35. Horák P. Helminth eggs in the sludge from three sewage treatment plants in Czechoslovakia. Folia parasitological. 1992, 39(2), 153–157.
  36. Water Research Commission , Priya Moodley, Colleen Archer and David Hawksworth in association with Lizette Leibach Standards methods for the recovery and enumeration od helminth ova in wastewater, sludge, compost and urine-diversion waste in South Africa, WRC Report No. TT322/08. Republic of South Africa, 2008.
  37. Jeska, E. L., Caruso, J. P., Donahue, M. J. Collection of fertile Ascaris suum eggs. The Journal of parasitology. 1986, 72(6), 964–965.
  38. Oksanen, A., Eriksen, L., Roepstorff, A., Ilsøe, B., Nansen, P., Lind, P. Embryonation and infectivity of Ascaris suum eggs. A comparison of eggs collected from worm uteri with eggs isolated from pig faeces. Acta veterinaria Scandinavica. 1990, 31(4), 393–398. [CrossRef]
  39. Popat, S.C., Yates, M.V., Deshusses, M.A. Kinetics of inactivation of indicator pathogens during thermophilic anaerobic digestion. Water research. 2010, 44 (20), 5965–5972. [CrossRef]
  40. Gaspard P.G., Wiart J., Schwartzbrod J. Urban sludge reuse in agriculture: waste treatment and parasitological risk. Bioresource Technology. 1995, 52(1), 37–40. [CrossRef]
  41. Pecson, B.M., Barrios, J.A., Jiménez, B.E., Nelson, K.L. The effects of temperature, pH, and ammonia concentration on the inactivation of Ascaris eggs in sewage sludge. Water Research. 2007, 41 (13), 2893–2902. [CrossRef]
  42. Senecal, J., Nordin, A., Vinnerås, B., Fate of Ascaris at various pH, temperature and moisture levels. Journal of water and health. 2020, 18(3), 375–382. [CrossRef]
  43. Enigk K. Dey-Hazra A., Zur Oberflachenstruktur und Funktion der ausseren Proteinhiille der Eies von Ascaris suum (Nematoda). (The surface and function of the protein layer of Ascaris suum eggs). Berliner und Munchener tierarztliche Wochenschrift. 1976, 89(14), 276–281.
  44. Geenen, P. L., Bresciani, J., Boes, J., Pedersen, A., Eriksen, L., Fagerholm, H. P., Nansen, P., The morphogenesis of Ascaris suum to the infective third-stage larvae within the egg. The Journal of parasitology. 1999, 85(4), 616–622.
  45. Maya, C., Pérez, M., Velásquez, G., Barrios, J. A., Román, A., Jiménez, B. Quick incubation process to determine inactivation of Ascaris and Toxocara eggs. Water science and technology: a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research. 2019, 80(12), 2328–2337. [CrossRef]
  46. Katakam, K. K., Mejer, H., Dalsgaard, A., Kyvsgaard, N. C., Thamsborg, S. M. Survival of Ascaris suum and Ascaridia galli eggs in liquid manure at different ammonia concentrations and temperatures. Veterinary parasitology. 2014, 204(3-4), 249–257. [CrossRef]
  47. Eriksen, L., Andeeasen, P., Ilsoe, B. Inactivation od Ascaris suum eggs during storage in lime treated sewage sludge. Water. Research. 1996, 30(4,), 1026-1029. [CrossRef]
  48. Husna, M.S., Barti, S.M., Mayrina, F. The Efficiency of Ascaris Spp. Eggs Inactivation in Sewage Sludge by Lime Dosage, Ammonia Concentration, and Temperature Variation. Journal of Environmental Health. 2023, 15(4), 267-274. [CrossRef]
  49. Rudolfs W., Falk L.L., Ragotzkie R.A. Contamination of Vegetables Grown in Polluted Soil: III. Field Studies on Ascaris Eggs. Sewage and Industrial Wastes. 1951, 23(5), 656–660. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25031661.
  50. Kowalczyk K., Kłapeć T. Contamination of soil with eggs of geohelminths Ascaris spp., Trichuris spp., Toxocara spp. in Poland – potential source of health risk in farmers. Annals of parasitology. 2020, 66(4), 433–440. [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The average percentages of A. suum eggs of questionable viability (QE) isolated from the uteri of adult female roundworms (U), obtained from pig faeces (F) and from sewage sludge (S).
Figure 1. The average percentages of A. suum eggs of questionable viability (QE) isolated from the uteri of adult female roundworms (U), obtained from pig faeces (F) and from sewage sludge (S).
Preprints 172351 g001
Figure 2. The average percentages of A. suum eggs containing live larvae (LE) isolated from the uteri of adult female roundworms (U), obtained from pig faeces (F) and from sewage sludge (S).
Figure 2. The average percentages of A. suum eggs containing live larvae (LE) isolated from the uteri of adult female roundworms (U), obtained from pig faeces (F) and from sewage sludge (S).
Preprints 172351 g002
Figure 3. The average percentages of A. suum dead eggs (DE) isolated from the uteri of adult female roundworms (U), obtained from pig faeces (F) and from sewage sludge (S).
Figure 3. The average percentages of A. suum dead eggs (DE) isolated from the uteri of adult female roundworms (U), obtained from pig faeces (F) and from sewage sludge (S).
Preprints 172351 g003
Table 1. The average percentages of A. suum eggs of questionable viability (QE), containing live larvae (LE) and dead (DE) isolated from the uteri of adult female roundworms observed in subsequent weeks of incubation.
Table 1. The average percentages of A. suum eggs of questionable viability (QE), containing live larvae (LE) and dead (DE) isolated from the uteri of adult female roundworms observed in subsequent weeks of incubation.
Eggs
category
Statistical
parameters
Incubation time [week]
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
QE Avg (%) 98 94 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Range 96-99 91-95 8-10 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0
SD 1.00 1.42 0.58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Standardized scores 82.47 78.30 -6.28 -15.45 -15.45 -15.45 -15.45 -15.45 -15.45 -15.45 -15.45 -15.45
t-value 585.9 556.3 -44.6 -109.8 -109.8 -109.8 -109.8 -109.8 -109.8 -109.8 -109.8 -109.8
p-value 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LE Avg (%) 0 0 84 94 84 82 66 47 26 19 7 2 0
Range 0-0 0-0 82-87 92-96 78-87 79-85 63-70 41-50 23-28 17-20 4-10 0-5 0-1
SD 0 0 1.37 1.31 2.94 2.15 2.31 2,71 1.38 0.98 1.83 1.42 0.39
Standardized scores -39.22 -39.22 45.12 55.20 44.37 42.28 26.45 7.87 -13.63 -20.55 -32.13 -37.47
t-value -82.76 -82.76 95.20 116.48 93.62 89.22 55.81 16.60 -28.77 -43.37 -67.81 -79.06
p-value 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DE Avg (%) 2 6 7 6 16 18 34 53 74 81 93 98 100
Range 1-4 5-9 3-9 4-8 13-22 15-21 30-37 50-59 72-77 80-83 90-96 95-100 99-100
SD 1.00 1.42 1.68 1.31 2.94 2.15 2.31 2.71 1.38 0.98 1.83 1.42 0.39
Standardized scores -43.25 -39.08 -38.83 -39.75 -28.92 -26.83 -11.00 7.58 29.08 36.00 47.58 52.92
t-value -86.85 -78.48 -77.98 -79.82 -58.07 -53.88 -22.09 15.23 58.40 72.29 95.55 106.26
p-value 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table 2. The average percentages of A. suum eggs of questionable viability (QE), containing live larvae (LE) and dead (DE) obtained from pig faeces, observed in subsequent weeks of incubation.
Table 2. The average percentages of A. suum eggs of questionable viability (QE), containing live larvae (LE) and dead (DE) obtained from pig faeces, observed in subsequent weeks of incubation.
Eggs
category
Statistical
parameters
Incubation time [week]
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
QE Avg (%) 90 76 70 21 18 14 10 8 0 0 0 0 0
Range 87-97 72-80 66-73 14-25 14-24 10-18 8-13 6-10 0-0 0-2 0-0 0-0 0-0
SD 2.82 2.66 2.02 3.18 4.52 2.38 1.93 1.68 0 0.58 0 0 0
Standardized scores 66.21 52.37 45.71 -3.13 -5.04 -9.38 -13.04 -15.71 -23.63 -23.46 -23.63 -23.63
t-value 109.47 86.59 75.57 -5.17 -8.34 -15.51 -21.57 -25.98 -39.07 -38.79 -39.07 -39.07
p-value 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LE Avg (%) 0 0 0 42 46 52 40 29 15 8 5 2 0
Range 0-0 0-0 0-0 39-49 40-51 49-55 37-43 25-34 12-20 6-11 3-7 1-3 0-2
SD 0 0 0 3.36 4.38 1.78 1.91 2.21 2.09 1.70 1.30 0.78 0.65
Standardized scores -18.33 -18.33 -18.33 23.92 27.25 33.17 21.42 10.83 -3.08 -10.17 -13.67 -16.67
t-value -32.99 -32.99 -32.99 43.04 49.04 59.69 38.54 19.50 -5.55 -18.30 -24.59 -29.99
p-value 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DE Avg (%) 10 24 30 37 36 34 50 63 85 92 95 98 100
Range 3-13 20-28 27-34 35-40 35-38 31-39 47-53 59-66 80-88 89-94 93-97 97-99 98-100
SD 2.82 2.66 2.02 1.64 0.94 1.91 1.97 2.27 2.09 1.56 1.30 0.78 0.65
Standardized scores -47.87 -34.04 -27.37 -20.79 -22.21 -23.79 -8.37 4.88 26.71 33.63 37.29 40.29
t-value -92.59 -65.83 -52.94 -40.21 -42.95 -46.01 -16.19 9.43 51.66 65.04 72.13 77.93
p-value 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table 3. The average percentages of A. suum eggs of questionable viability (QE), containing live larvae (LE) and dead (DE), obtained from sewage sludge, observed in subsequent weeks of incubation.
Table 3. The average percentages of A. suum eggs of questionable viability (QE), containing live larvae (LE) and dead (DE), obtained from sewage sludge, observed in subsequent weeks of incubation.
Eggs
category
Statistical
parameters
Incubation time [week]
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
QE Avg (%) 79 70 59 41 22 14 9 6 4 3 1 1 0
Range 66-92 54-76 35-68 28-55 13-37 4-21 4-16 2-11 0-8 0-7 0-3 0-4 0-0
SD 8.98 8.21 12.89 8.68 9.01 5.85 4.12 3.51 2.71 2.57 1.16 1.42 0
Standardized scores 55.40 46.15 34.99 16.99 -2.10 -9.26 -14.01 -18.01 -20.26 -21.85 -22.76 -22.60
t-value 30.34 25.27 19.16 9.30 -1.15 -5.07 -7.67 -9.86 -11.10 -11.96 -12.46 -12.37
p-value 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LE Avg (%) 0 0 0 0 2 3 3 3 3 2 1 0 0
Range 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-5 0-10 0-10 0-10 0-10 0-10 0-5 0-0 0-2
SD 0 0 0 0 1.88 3.78 3.78 3.78 3.78 3.74 1.91 0 0.65
Standardized scores -1.179 -1.179 -1.179 -1.179 0.321 1.404 1.404 1.404 1.404 1.071 0.071 -1.179
t-value -1.733 -1.733 -1.733 -1.733 0.471 2.063 2.063 2.063 2.063 1.573 0.104 -1.733
p-value 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.64 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.12 0.92 0.09
DE Avg (%) 21 30 41 59 76 83 88 91 93 95 98 99 99
Range 8-34 24-46 32-65 45-72 58-87 72-96 78-96 81-98 86-100 90-99 95-100 96-100 97-100
SD 8.98 8.21 12.89 8.67 10.85 8.58 6.88 6.53 5.41 3.41 1.72 1.42 1.03
Standardized scores -54.23 -44.98 -33.81 -15.73 1.77 8.69 12.35 16.60 18.85 20.19 22.69 23.77
t-value -26.24 -21.76 -16.36 -7.61 0.86 4.20 5.98 8.03 9.12 9.77 10.98 11.50
p-value 0 0 0 0 0.39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated