Submitted:
09 July 2025
Posted:
10 July 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
- It is essential to consider CS even in the absence of systemic manifestations (among the 103 patients evaluated for suspected sarcoidosis during the study period, 12 individuals, 11.7%, presented with cardiac manifestations only, without evidence of systemic involvement).
- The capability of FDG PET/CT to detect active myocardial inflammation at an early stage enables clinicians to initiate timely therapeutic interventions, potentially preventing severe complications such as life-threatening brady and tachy-arrhythmias. Early identification of cardiac involvement is vital, given the often subtle or nonspecific clinical presentations and the limitations of conventional diagnostic methods like EBM. One significant challenge in diagnosing CS is the low sensitivity of EBM, primarily due to the patchy and focal nature of granulomatous infiltration within the myocardium [8]. In our cohort, only 4 patients underwent EMB, without histological diagnosis of CS, highlighting the limitations of histological confirmation although guided by ventricular 3D-EAM [14].
- The integration of perfusion imaging with 13N-NH3 PET/CT enhances the diagnostic and prognostic value of PET/CT. By distinguishing areas of perfusion defects (indicative of fibrosis) from regions of increased FDG uptake (active inflammation), clinicians can fully characterize the spectrum of disease, from isolated inflammation to fibrosis, and overlapping pathology, for comprehensive disease evaluation, prognosis, and guiding tailored therapeutic strategies [9].
- Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is the first-line advanced diagnostic test for CS; however, it was not feasible for all patients and sometimes produced inconclusive results, further illustrating the diagnostic gap that PET/CT can address. In this regard, our findings confirm that FDG PET/CT is highly sensitive for detecting active myocardial inflammation, as demonstrated by the characteristic uptake patterns observed.
- Moreover, our findings reinforce the utility of PET/CT in guiding individualized treatment strategies. By offering a non-invasive assessment of myocardial inflammatory activity, PET/CT allows clinicians to tailor immunosuppressive therapy based on objective evidence of disease activity or remission. This approach facilitates the adjustment of immunosuppressive regimens, such as corticosteroids and steroid-sparing agents, while minimizing unnecessary exposure to medication side effects, thereby improving patient safety and quality of life [13]. Serial PET/CT imaging enhances disease monitoring by enabling quantitative and qualitative assessments of therapeutic response. In our cohort, follow-up PET/CT scans confirmed a complete metabolic response in most patients (77.8%), supporting decisions to taper immunosuppressive therapy in selected cases (25%). Conversely, persistent or recurrent FDG uptake necessitated continued or intensified treatment (75%), underscoring the role of PET/CT in dynamic, patient-centered clinical management.
- Despite these positive outcomes, our cohort experienced some cardiac events during follow-up, including one patient who developed sustained ventricular tachycardia, refractory to conventional therapy and managed with targeted radiation therapy, and another who experienced heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. These findings highlight that patients with CS remain at risk for complications, emphasizing the need for ongoing clinical vigilance and periodic imaging reassessment. They also reinforce the central role of FDG PET/CT not only in initial diagnosis but also in the longitudinal management of CS. Serial imaging allows clinicians to monitor therapeutic responses, guide adjustments in immunosuppressive regimens, and promptly identify patients at risk for adverse cardiac events, thereby improving overall patient outcomes.
5. Conclusions
Funding
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| CS | cardiac sarcoidosis |
| CMR | cardiac magnetic resonance |
| EMB | endomyocardial biopsy |
| FDG | 18F-fluorodeoxiglucose |
| LGE | late gadolinium enhancement |
| LV | left ventricle |
| RV | right ventricle |
References
- Saric P, Young KA, Rodriguez-Porcel M, Chareonthaitawee P. PET Imaging in Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Narrative Review with Focus on Novel PET Tracers. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021 Dec 9;14(12):1286. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Shah HH, Zehra SA, Shahrukh A, Waseem R, Hussain T, Hussain MS, Batool F and Jaffer M (2023) Cardiac sarcoidosis: a comprehensive review of risk factors, pathogenesis, diagnosis, clinical manifestations, and treatment strategies. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 10:1156474. [CrossRef]
- Pour-Ghaz, I.; Kayali, S.; Abutineh, I.; Patel, J.; Roman, S.; Nayyar, M.; Yedlapati, N. Cardiac Sarcoidosis: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management. Hearts 2021, 2, 234–250. [CrossRef]
- Kafil TS, Shaikh OM, Fanous Y, Benjamen J, Hashmi MM, Jawad A, Dahrouj T, Abazid RM, Swiha M, Romsa J, Beanlands RSB, Ruddy TD, Mielniczuk L, Birnie DH, Tzemos N. Risk Stratification in Cardiac Sarcoidosis With Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Sep;17(9):1079-1097. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu A, Munemo LT, Martins N, Kouranos V, Wells AU, Sharma RK, Wechalekar K. Assessment of Cardiac Sarcoidosis with PET/CT. J Nucl Med Technol. 2025 Jun 4;53(2):123-129. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bois JP, Muser D, Chareonthaitawee P. PET/CT Evaluation of Cardiac Sarcoidosis. PET Clin. 2019 Apr;14(2):223-232. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abikhzer G, Treglia G, Pelletier-Galarneau M, Buscombe J, Chiti A, Dibble EH, Glaudemans AWJM, Palestro CJ, Sathekge M, Signore A, Jamar F, Israel O, Gheysens O. EANM/SNMMI guideline/procedure standard for [18F]FDG hybrid PET use in infection and inflammation in adults v2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025 Jan;52(2):510-538. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Birnie DH, Sauer WH, Bogun F, Cooper JM, Culver DA, Duvernoy CS, Judson MA, Kron J, Mehta D, Cosedis Nielsen J, Patel AR, Ohe T, Raatikainen P, Soejima K. HRS expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of arrhythmias associated with cardiac sarcoidosis. Heart Rhythm. 2014 Jul;11(7):1305-23. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Al Hayja MA, Vinjamuri S. Cardiac sarcoidosis: the role of cardiac MRI and 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the diagnosis and treatment follow-up. Br J Cardiol. 2023 Feb 21;30(1):7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Tuominen H, Haarala A, Tikkakoski A, Kähönen M, Nikus K, Sipilä K. FDG-PET in possible cardiac sarcoidosis: Right ventricular uptake and high total cardiac metabolic activity predict cardiovascular events. J Nucl Cardiol. 2021 Feb;28(1):199-205. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Kaneko K, Nagao M, Yamamoto A, Sakai A, Sakai S. FDG uptake patterns in isolated and systemic cardiac sarcoidosis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2023 Jun;30(3):1065-1074. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chareonthaitawee P, Beanlands RS, Chen W, Dorbala S, Miller EJ, Murthy VL, Birnie DH, Chen ES, Cooper LT, Tung RH, White ES, Borges-Neto S, Di Carli MF, Gropler RJ, Ruddy TD, Schindler TH, Blankstein R. Joint SNMMI-ASNC expert consensus document on the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in cardiac sarcoid detection and therapy monitoring. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017 Oct;24(5):1741-1758. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cheng RK, Kittleson MM, Beavers CJ, Birnie DH, Blankstein R, Bravo PE, Gilotra NA, Judson MA, Patton KK, Rose-Bovino L; American Heart Association Heart Failure and Transplantation Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology, and Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing. Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2024 May 21;149(21):e1197-e1216. . Erratum in: Circulation. 2024 Aug 20;150(8):e197. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001275. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Narducci ML, La Rosa G, Pinnacchio G, Inzani F, d’Amati G, Perna F, Bencardino G, D’Amario D, Pieroni M, Dello Russo A, Casella M, Pelargonio G, Crea F. Assessment of patients presenting with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias and suspected myocarditis: The key role of endomyocardial biopsy. Heart Rhythm. 2021 Jun;18(6):907-915. [CrossRef] [PubMed]





| Patient n. | Sex | Age at Diagnosis | Diagnostic Findings |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M | 46 | Extra-cardiac biopsy, abnormal echocardiography and CMR |
| 2 | F | 52 | Extra-cardiac biopsy, abnormal ECG and echocardiography |
| 3 | M | 63 | Extra-cardiac biopsy, abnormal ECG and echocardiography |
| 4 | M | 71 | Abnormal ECG |
| 5 | F | 52 | Extra-cardiac biopsy |
| 6 | F | 51 | Extra-cardiac biopsy |
| 7 | M | 59 | Extra-cardiac biopsy |
| 8 | M | 42 | Abnormal ECG and CMR |
| 9 | M | 55 | Abnormal ECG and echocardiography |
| 10 | F | 44 | Extra-cardiac biopsy |
| 11 | F | 77 | Extra-cardiac biopsy, abnormal CMR |
| 12 | M | 23 | Abnormal ECG |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).