Submitted:
23 June 2025
Posted:
25 June 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
- Databases and vector digital layers delineating basic (stable over the long-term) soil parameters (Research Institute of Soil Science and Soil Protection Bratislava)
- GSAA databases containing actual cultivation data for the time period between 2020 and 2024 (Ministry of Agriculture and Regional Development of Slovakia).
- For the period between the years 2020 and 2024, we evaluated the following vegetable species:
- Brassica vegetables: Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitala L.), Kale (Brassica oleracea var. sabauda L.), Kohlrabi (Brassica oleracea var. Gongylodes L.)
- Root vegetables: Wild Carrot (Daucus carota L.), Parsley (Petroselinum crispum L.)
- Fruiting vegetables: Cucumber (Cucumis sativum L.), Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.), Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)
- Onion vegetables: Onion (Allium cepa L.), Garlic (Allium sativum L.), Leek (Allium porrum L.)
2.1. Identifying Soils Suitable for Vegetable Growing
2.2. Identification of Actual Vegetable Cultivation Areas
3. Results
3.1. Pedogeographic specifics of vegetable cultivation in Slovakia
3.1.1. BRASSICA VEGETABLES
3.1.2. ROOT VEGETABLES
3.1.3. FRUITING VEGETABLES
3.1.4. ALLIUM VEGETABLES
3.1. Optimal Area Selection for Vegetable Growing
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Babincová, Z. Súpis plôch osiatych poľnohospodárskymi plodinami k 20. 5. 2024; Štatistický úrad Slovenskej republiky: Bratislava, Slovakia, 2024, 050324; p. 33.
- Brodová, M. Zelenina a ovocie – Komoditná Situačná a Výhľadová Správa k 31. 12. 2023; MPRV SR: Bratislava, Slovakia, 2024, roč. XXVI; p. 77.
- Vilček, J.; Bedrna, Z. Vhodnosť poľnohospodárskych pôd a krajiny Slovenska na pestovanie rastlín; VÚPOP: Bratislava, Slovakia, 2007, p. 248.
- Pevná, V. Záhradníctvo; Príroda: Bratislava, Slovakia, 1984, p. 541.
- Demo, M.; Hričovský, I. Trvalo udržateľné technológie v záhradníctve; SPU: Nitra, 2002, p. 662.
- Džatko M.; Sobocká J. Príručka pre používanie máp pôdnoekologických jednotiek; Soil Science and Conservation Research Institute: Bratislava, Slovakia, 2009; p. 102.
- Tomlain, J. Klimatický ukazovateľ zavlaženia. In Atlas Slovenskej Socialistickej Republiky; Slovak Academy of Science: Bratislava, Slovakia, 1980; p. 63.
- Škvarenina, J.; Križová, E.; Tomlain, J.N. Impact of the climate change on the water balance of altitudinal vegetation stages in Slovakia. Ekológia 2004, 23(2), 13–29.
- IUSS Working Group WRB. 2022. World Reference Base for Soil Resources. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. 4th edition. International Union of Soil Sciences (IUSS), Vienna, Austria.
- Mazúr, E.; Lukniš, M. Regionálne geomorfologické členenie Slovenskej socialistickej republiky. Geogr. J. 1978, 30(2), 101–125. [Google Scholar]
- Džatko, M. Hodnotenie produkčného potenciálu poľnohospodárskych pôd a pôdno-ekologických regiónov Slovenska; Soil Science and Conservation Research Institute: Bratislava, Slovakia, 2002; p. 88.
- Vilček, J.; Torma, S. Winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) growth potential in the Slovak rural landscape. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 2016, 62(2), 235–245.
- Vilček, J.; Maxin, M.; Lörincová, M.; Kudla M. Pedo-climatic predictions and reality of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) growing in Slovakia. Plant, Soil and Environment. 2023, 69(11), 545-553.
- Koco, Š.; Vilček, J.; Torma, S.; Michaeli, E.; Solár, V. Optimising Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Cultivation by Selection of Proper Soils. Agriculture 2020, 10(5), 155.
- Vilček, J.; Torma, S. Characterization of Soils in Slovakia for Sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) Cultivation Using Geographic Information system (GIS). Sugar Tech 2016, 18, 488-492.
- Lörincová M.; Vilček, J.; Koco, Š. Parametre plôch cukrovej repy pestovanej na Slovensku. Listy cukrov. a řepař. 2024, 140(2), 416-419.
- Antisari, L.V.; Orsini, F.; Marchetti, L.; Vianello, G.; Gianquinto, G. Heavy Metal Accumulation in Vegetables Grown in Urban Gardens. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2015, 35, 1139–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bosiacki, M.; Bednorz, L.; Fedenczak, K.; Górecki, T.; Mizgajski, A.; Ponizy, L.; Spizewski, T. Soil Quality as a Key Factor in Producing Vegetables for Home Consumption—A Case Study of Urban Allotments in Gorzów Wielkopolski (Poland). Agronomy 2021, 11(9), 1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bretzel, F.; Calderisi, M.; Scatena, M.; Pini, R. Soil Quality Is Key for Planning and Managing Urban Allotments Intended for the Sustainable Production of Home-Consumption Vegetables. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 17753–17760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Divyabharathi, M.C.; Gokulapriya, T.; Sundarrajan, R.V. Soil management practices for optimal vegetable production. In: Vegetable Science Frontiers: Insights of Olericulture, 1st ed.; Jawadagi, R., Hadimani, H., Evoor, S., Kishorkumar, G.K.; Publicher: Stella International Publication, Kurukshetra, India, 2024, p. 415-432.
- Haynes, R. J.; Tregurtha, R. Effects of increasingperiods under intensive arable vegetable production on biological, chemical and physical indices of soil quality. Biology and Fertility of Soils 1999, 28, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dass, A.; Lenka, N. K.; Patnaik, U. S.; Sudhishri, S. Integrated Nutrient Management for Production, Economics, and Soil Improvement in Winter Vegetables. International Journal of Vegetable Science 2008, 14, 104–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olowolaju, E. D.; Okunlola, G. O.; Ayeotan, O. J. Growth, yield and uptake of some nutrients by tomato as affected by iron concentration. International Journal of Vegetable Science 2020, 27(4), 378–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, X.; Gao, Y.; Pan, S. Differences in enrichment and soil safety thresholds of five vegetables grown in Cd-polluted soil of Chengdu Plain, China. Environ Geochem Health 2025, 47(6), 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Feng, J.J.; Liao, J.X.; Jiang, Q.W.; Mo, L. Heavy metal contamination of vegetables in China: status, causes, and impacts. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2025, 32, 864–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- da Silva, C.S.R. , da Silva Araújo, E., Costa, L.S. et al. No-till system organic vegetable production under green manure: effect on yield and soil properties. Org. Agr. 2024, 14, 231–244. [Google Scholar]
- Sharma, R.P.; Singh, R.S.; Singh, S.K.; Naik, P.S.; Singh, B. Health of Soil Supporting Vegetable Cultivation in Peri-Urban Areas. International Journal of Vegetable Science 2015, 22(1), 35–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suleiman, R.; Jimoh, I.A.; Aliyu, J. Assessment of soil physical and chemical properties undervegetable cultivation in Abuja metropolitan area, Nigeria. Zaria Geographer 2017, 24(1), 89 -99.
- Larkin, R.P. Effects of Selected Soil Amendments and Mulch Type on Soil Properties and Productivity in Organic Vegetable Production. Agronomy 2020, 10(6), 795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ladaru, G. R.; Ilie, D. M.; Diaconeasa, M. C.; Petre, I.; Marin, F.; Lazar, V. Influencing factors of a sustainable vegetable choice, The Romanian consumers’ case. Sustainability 2020, 12(23), 9991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sterie, C. M. Trends in area and production of vegetables, future projections in Romania, In: Agrarian Economy and Rural Development - Trends and Challenges. International Symposium. 14th Edition, ed.; Rodino, Steliana Dragomir, Vili; Publicher: The Research Institute for Agricultural Economy and Rural Development (ICEADR), 2023, Bucharest, 195-200.
- de Putter, H.; Koesveld, M.J.; Visser, C.L.M. Overview of the vegetable sector in Tanzania. Afriveg, Wageningen, the Netherlands, 2007, p. 32.
- Swai, R.E.A. Horticultural production and marketing in Tanzania. Acta Horticulturae 1991, 270, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]



| Code | Characteristics | TS > 10 °C | CMI (mm) | T veget (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 00 | very warm, very dry, flat | > 3000 | 200 | 16-17 |
| 01 | warm, very dry, flat | 3000-2800 | 200-150 | 15-17 |
| 02 | sufficiently warm, dry, hilly | 2800-2500 | 150-100 | 15-16 |
| 03 | warm, very dry, flat, continental | 3160-2800 | 200-150 | 15-17 |
| 04 | warm, very dry, basin-like, continental | 3030-2800 | 200-100 | 15-16 |
| 05 | relatively warm, dry, basin-like, continental | 2800-2500 | 150-100 | 14-15 |
| 06 | relatively warm, moderately dry, highland-like continental | 2800-2500 | 100-50 | 14-15 |
| 07 | moderately warm, moderately moist | 2500-2200 | 100-0 | 13-15 |
| 08 | moderately cold, moderately moist | 2200-2000 | 100-0 | 12-14 |
| 09 | cold, moist | 2000-1800 | 60-50 | 12-13 |
| 10 | very cold, moist | < 1800 | < 50 | 10-11 |
| Vegetable | Parameters | Soil for growing | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| very suitable | suitable | less suitable | ||
| Cabbage, Kale, Kohlrabi |
Climatic regions Soil groups Slope Gravel Depth Texture |
00 to 07 CH, FL P WI D SL to CL |
00 to 10 CH, FL P WI and WE MD SL to CL |
00 to10 LV, CM P WI and ME MD SL to CL |
| Carrot, Parsley | Climatic regions Soil groups Slope Gravel Depth Texture |
00 to 06 CH, LV, FL P WI D SL to L |
00 to 06 CH,LV, FL P and MO WI to WE D SL to L |
00 to 06 CH, LV, FL, RG, LP P and MO WI to WE D S to CL |
| Cucumber | Climatic regions Soil groups Slope Gravel Depth Texture |
00 to 04 CH, LV, FL P WI D SL to L |
00 to 04 CH, LV, FL P and MO WI and WE D SL to CL |
05 and 06 LV, FL, LP P and MO WI and WE D SL to CL |
| Pepper | Climatic regions Soil groups Slope Gravel Depth Texture |
00 CH, LV, FL P WI D SL to L |
00 and 01 CH, LV, FL P WI D S to L |
01 CH, LV, FL P and MO WI and WE D S to L |
| Tomato | Climatic regions Soil groups Slope Gravel Depth Texture |
00 to 04 CH, LV, FL P WI D SL to CL |
00 to 04 CH, LV, FL,RG,CM P WI D S to CL |
05 to 06 CH, LV, FL,CM P WI D SL to CL |
| Onion, Garlic, Leek |
Climatic regions Soil groups Slope Gravel Depth Texture |
00 to 04 CH, LV, FL,CM P WI and WE. D PH to H |
00 to 06 CH, LV, FL,RG, CM P WI and WE D and MD PH to H |
00 to 07 CH, LV, FL,RG, CM, LP P WI to ME D to S PH to IH |
| Crop | soil category (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| very suitable | suitable | less suitable | unsuitable | |
| onion | 4.89 | 24.82 | 2.54 | 67.75 |
| beetroot | 27.72 | 6.59 | 5.61 | 60.07 |
| beans | 30.92 | 17.79 | 3.14 | 48.15 |
| cabbage | 8.06 | 6.05 | 35.24 | 50.65 |
| cauliflower | 35.01 | 4.40 | 8.88 | 51.71 |
| carrot | 26.96 | 3.63 | 6.58 | 62.84 |
| pepper | 1.26 | 4.94 | 13.64 | 80.16 |
| tomato | 23.71 | 8.38 | 0.35 | 67.56 |
| asparagus | 3.57 | 2.05 | 0.56 | 93.83 |
| pumpkin | 23.37 | 8.51 | 0.86 | 67.25 |
| cucumber | 19.83 | 8.84 | 0.15 | 71.17 |
| celery | 32.61 | 5.07 | 2.93 | 59.39 |
| Crop | soil category (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| very suitable | suitable | less suitable | unsuitable | |
| onion | 9.28 | 60.31 | 7.67 | 22.75 |
| beetroot | 9.90 | 4.39 | 6.35 | 79.40 |
| beans | 26.61 | 25.99 | 0.01 | 47.36 |
| cabbage | 2.26 | 11.16 | 65.53 | 21.04 |
| cauliflower | 55.87 | 15.21 | 0.49 | 28.36 |
| carrot | 54.21 | 1.18 | 11.10 | 33.52 |
| pepper | 0.48 | 2.68 | 67.74 | 29.07 |
| tomato | 58.73 | 17.35 | - | 23.85 |
| asparagus | - | 57.61 | - | 42.42 |
| pumpkin | 10.15 | 7.76 | 1.23 | 80.85 |
| cucumber | 39.87 | 17.16 | - | 43.19 |
| celery | 74.92 | 2.36 | 2.47 | 20.32 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
