Submitted:
11 June 2025
Posted:
11 June 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
3.1. Effect of Experimental Conditions


3.2. Correlation Between Undulation Land and Flat Land

3.3. Economic Impact
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Lal, R. Erosion–Soil Conservation and Smallholder Agriculture. In Soil Conservation and Sustainable Land Management, 2nd ed.; Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, UK, 1995; Volume 1, pp. 101–115. [Google Scholar]
- Montgomery, D. R. Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Benincasa, P.; Nasta, P.; Poesen, J.; Simmons, C. Soil conservation techniques in Mediterranean orchards: Effects on erosion and water retention. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 2012, 67, 245–259. [Google Scholar]
- Liniger, H.; Critchley, W. Where the Land is Greener: Case Studies and Analysis of Soil and Water Conservation Initiatives Worldwide; CTA/FAO: Rome, Italy, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Pimentel, D.; Harvey, C.; Resosudarmo, P.; Sinclair, K.; Kurz, D.; McNair, M.; Blair, R. Environmental and economic costs of soil erosion and conservation benefits. Science 1995, 267(5201), 1117–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brady, N. C.; Weil, R. R. The Nature and Properties of Soils, 14th ed.; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2008; pp. 101–120. [Google Scholar]
- Poesen, J.; Nasta, P.; Pimentel, D. Gully erosion and environmental change: Importance, processes and research needs. Catena 2003, 50(2–4), 91–133.
- IPCC. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Lal, R. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 2004, 304(5677), 1623–1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Smith, P.; Martino, D.; Cai, Z.; Gwary, D.; Janzen, H.; Kumar, P. ;... & Smith, J. Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2008, 363(1492), 789–813.
- ANM. Clima României – Date meteorologice regionale; Administrația Națională de Meteorologie: București, România, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Jitariu, A.; Popa, D.; Cristea, I. "Reabilitarea ecologică a haldelor de steril – studiu de caz în Valea Jiului". Revista de Silvicultură și Cinegetică 2017, 40(1), 33–40.
- Rusu, T.; Moraru, P. I.; Pop, A. I. Sisteme conservative de lucrare a solului în România. Research Journal of Agricultural Science 2011, 43(3), 160–165. [Google Scholar]
- Câmpeanu, G.; Hoza, D. Pomicultură generală și specială; Editura Ceres: București, România, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Morgan, R. P. C. Soil Erosion and Conservation, 3rd ed. ; Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, UK, 2005; pp. 120–150.Nasta, P.; Benincasa, P.; Poesen, J.; Simmons, C.; Wang, Y. Water management in Mediterranean agricultural landscapes using microrelief techniques. Agricultural Water Management 2017, 187, 52–63. [Google Scholar]
- Simmons, C.; Poesen, J.; Benincasa, P. Precision agriculture tools for microrelief soil shaping. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Agriculture, Barcelona, Spain, 15–17 July 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Smith, T.; Johnson, L. Microbial activity and soil fertility under varied tillage systems. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 2019, 131, 123–132. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y.; Liu, J.; Xie, Y. Effects of soil microrelief on orchard productivity. Journal of Agricultural Science 2018, 156(4), 523–532. [Google Scholar]
- Pimentel, D.; Harvey, C.; Resosudarmo, P.; Sinclair, K.; Kurz, D.; McNair, M.; Blair, R. Environmental and economic costs of soil erosion and conservation benefits. Science 1995, 267(5201), 1117–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Basso, B.; Antle, J. Digital agriculture to design sustainable agricultural systems. Nat. Sustain. 2020, 3, 254–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- FAO. Voluntary Guidelines for Sustainable Soil Management; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2017; Available online: https://www.fao.org/3/i6281e/i6281e.pdf (accessed on 2 June 2025).
- Jin, Y.; Liu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X. Effects of land consolidation on soil organic carbon and carbon sequestration: A case study in China. Catena 2019, 172, 227–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panagos, P.; Borrelli, P.; Poesen, J.; Ballabio, C.; Lugato, E.; Meusburger, K.; Montanarella, L. The new assessment of soil loss by water erosion in Europe. Environ. Sci. Policy 2015, 54, 438–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Xiong, W.; Liu, X. The role of terrain attributes in modeling crop yield under varying slope conditions. Agric. Syst. 2021, 192, 103192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Apostu, I.-M. , Faur, F., Lazar, M., Traista, E. 2024. Quality of the soils on degraded mining lands and possibilities of restoring their fertility - case study: rovinari coal basin. AgroLife Scientific Journal, 13(2), 40–54.
- Toderaș, M.; Florea, V.A.; Itu, R.B. Stability Analysis of the Tailings Dam for the Purpose of Closing, Greening, and Ensuring Its Safety—Study Case. Sustainability 2023, 15, 7606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]







| Year | Average Annual Temperature (°C) | Average Annual Precipitation (mm) |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 9.8 | 933.46 |
| 2016 | 9.0 | 1,100 |
| 2017 | 9.2 | 1,150 |
| 2018 | 9.4 | 1,200 |
| 2019 | 9.5 | 1,050 |
| 2020 | 9.6 | 1,000 |
| 2021 | 9.7 | 1,050 |
| 2022 | 9.3 | 715.26 |
| 2023 | 9.7 | 933.46 |
| 2024 | 12.99 | 1,200 |
| Grade | Initial Length (m) | Total Length (m) | Land Gained (m) | Gain % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 100 | 100.0152 | 0.0152 | 0.015% |
| 2 | 100 | 100.0608 | 0.0608 | 0.061% |
| 3 | 100 | 100.1372 | 0.1372 | 0.137% |
| 4 | 100 | 100.2440 | 0.2440 | 0.244% |
| 5 | 100 | 100.3818 | 0.3818 | 0.382% |
| 6 | 100 | 100.5508 | 0.5508 | 0.551% |
| 7 | 100 | 100.7508 | 0.7508 | 0.751% |
| 8 | 100 | 100.9826 | 0.9826 | 0.983% |
| 9 | 100 | 101.2464 | 1.2464 | 1.246% |
| 10 | 100 | 101.5426 | 1.5426 | 1.543% |
| 11 | 100 | 101.8716 | 1.8716 | 1.872% |
| 12 | 100 | 102.2340 | 2.2340 | 2.234% |
| 13 | 100 | 102.6304 | 2.6304 | 2.630% |
| 14 | 100 | 103.0612 | 3.0612 | 3.061% |
| 15 | 100 | 103.5276 | 3.5276 | 3.528% |
| 16 | 100 | 104.0298 | 4.0298 | 4.030% |
| 17 | 100 | 104.5690 | 4.5690 | 4.569% |
| 18 | 100 | 105.1462 | 5.1462 | 5.146% |
| 19 | 100 | 105.7620 | 5.7620 | 5.762% |
| 20 | 100 | 106.4176 | 6.4176 | 6.418% |
| Year | Red Melba kg (flat) | Red Melba kg (undulated) | Blue Plum kg (flat) | Blue Plum kg (undulated) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | 10,000 | 10,200 | 8,000 | 8,160 |
| 5 | 15,000 | 15,300 | 13,000 | 13,260 |
| 6 | 20,000 | 20,400 | 18,000 | 18,360 |
| 7 | 25,000 | 25,500 | 22,000 | 22,440 |
| 8 | 28,000 | 28,560 | 26,000 | 26,520 |
| 9 | 30,000 | 30,600 | 28,000 | 28,560 |
| 10 | 30,000 | 30,600 | 30,000 | 30,600 |
| Category | Min (€) | Max (€) |
|---|---|---|
| Implementation Costs | €800/ha | €1,500/ha |
| CO₂ Certificate Revenues (per year) | €67.20/ha | €76.80/ha |
| Payback Period (without external funding) | ~11.9 years | ~19.5 years |
| Costs with External Funding (30%) | €560/ha | €1,050/ha |
| Payback Period (with external funding) | ~8.3 years | ~13.7 years |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).