Submitted:
04 June 2025
Posted:
06 June 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. NUVO Scalar Field and Sinertia Flow
3. Replication of Galactic Rotation Curves
4. Interpretation of Dark Matter Halo as Scalar Modulation
5. Twisted Sinertia Flow and Frame Dragging
6. Numerical Results and Visualizations


7. Comparison to General Relativity and Standard Halo Models
- GR requires a stress–energy source (e.g., dark matter) to explain excess orbital velocities.
- NUVO reproduces these effects via scalar field depletion — a reduction in local sinertia due to inflow across a galaxy.
- GR predicts no redshift difference between stationary and orbiting clocks at the same radius, but NUVO does due to kinetic sinertia loss.
- GR assumes time dilation occurs only in potential wells; NUVO predicts time dilation wherever is elevated due to scalar flow geometry, including lagrangian points and symmetric wells like hollow spheres.
8. Discussion
- It eliminates the need for unseen matter, instead attributing curved trajectories to scalar modulation driven by observable baryonic distributions.
- It provides a geometric explanation for frame-dragging and potentially unifies rotational and translational gravitational effects under scalar modulation flow.
- It introduces the concept of scalar depletion zones, analogous to pressure drops in fluid systems, offering intuition for how galactic centers become deep wells despite symmetric baryonic distributions.
- It naturally incorporates redshift differences between test particles and photons by recognizing their differing scalar coupling through pinertia and sinertia, respectively.
9. The Michelson–Morley Experiment and the Nature of Space in NUVO
10. Conclusion
Acknowledgments
References
- Austin, R.W. Galactic Dynamics Without Dark Matter: Sinertia Flow and Scalar Geometry in NUVO Theory. Preprints 2025. [CrossRef]
- Rubin, V.C.; Ford Jr., W.K.; Thonnard, N. Rotational properties of 21 SC galaxies with a large range of luminosities and radii, from NGC 4605 (R = 4kpc) to UGC 2885 (R = 122kpc). The Astrophysical Journal 1980, 238, 471–487. [CrossRef]
- Clowe, D.; Bradac, M.; Gonzalez, A.H.; Markevitch, M.; Randall, S.W.; Jones, C.; Zaritsky, D. A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter. The Astrophysical Journal Letters 2006, 648, L109. [CrossRef]
- Battaglia, G.; Helmi, A.; Morrison, H.; et al. The radial velocity dispersion profile of the Galactic halo: Constraining the density profile of the dark halo of the Milky Way. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2005, 364, 433–442. [CrossRef]
- Michelson, A.A.; Morley, E.W. On the Relative Motion of the Earth and the Luminiferous Ether. American Journal of Science 1887, 34, 333–345. [CrossRef]
- Einstein, A. Relativity: The Special and General Theory; Methuen & Co. Ltd., 1920.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).