Submitted:
26 May 2025
Posted:
27 May 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
- Pinertia (): Governs modulation due to velocity, representing how a particle couples to geometry through motion.
- Sinertia (): Governs modulation due to gravitational potential, representing how a particle extracts structural coherence from space.
2. Scalar Modulation and Inertial Structure
- Pinertia (): The inertial modulation of a particle due to its velocity. It represents how a particle’s motion through space modifies its local measurement of time and distance.
- Sinertia (): The scalar modulation associated with gravitational potential. It represents the extent to which a particle draws from spatial structure in order to maintain its existence as a coherent, geometrically embedded object.
3. Defining Sinertia Collapse
- The scalar field no longer changes with position: .
- The space around the particle becomes inert — unable to support modulation.
- Propagation, structure, and forces cease to operate; geometry becomes static and decoupled.
- Outside the kenos: sinertia is positive, varies, and space can mediate structure.
- At the boundary: , the modulation field stalls.
- Inside the kenos: sinertia is zero, and pinertia becomes ineffective; the particle cannot sustain interaction with geometry.
4. NUVO Black Hole Boundary
5. Interior Dynamics and Condensate Behavior
- There are no forces — force requires a gradient in modulation.
- There is no structure — sinertia is zero, and space has no coherence.
- There is no information flow — propagation requires a varying field.
- All motion is kinetic — constrained to , without resistance or reference.
6. Comparison to GR Black Holes
| Feature | GR Black Hole | NUVO Black Hole |
|---|---|---|
| Horizon definition | (escape velocity = c) | (modulation collapse) |
| Interior state | Curved spacetime, singularity at center | Flat, non-modulating scalar condensate |
| Field breakdown | Divergence in curvature tensors | Inactivation of |
| Causal isolation | Light cones tilt inward | Scalar gradients vanish |
| Matter state | Infinite compression, pointlike core | Null modulation, kinetic condensate |
| Information loss | Paradoxical | Prevented by boundary modulation |
| Time behavior | Freezes at horizon (from outside) | Pinertia diverges at horizon |
| Geometry behavior | Curved, singular | Flat, inert |
7. Conceptual Implications
7.1 Information and Modulation Gradients
7.2 Entropy and the Modulation Surface
7.3 Modulation-Based Holography
7.4 Quantum Field Compatibility
8. Conclusion
Appendix A: Flux Capacitor Formalism
A.1 Conceptual Basis
- Pinertial flow: The velocity-based component (), which governs time-like modulation,
- Sinertial flow: The potential-based component (), which governs space-like structure and coherence.
A.2 Operational Criteria
A.3 Threshold Interpretation
A.4 Visualization
Appendix B: Geodesic and Proper Time Behavior at the Kenos Boundary
B.1 Geodesic Evolution with Scalar Modulation
B.2 Proper Time Behavior Near the Kenos
B.3 Trapped Kinetic Limit
Appendix C: Energy Conditions and Stability Bounds in NUVO Collapse
C.1 Modulation-Energy Interpretation
C.2 NUVO Stability Bound
C.3 Boundary Surface Energy Density
C.4 Global Energy Conservation in Collapse
Appendix D: Comparison of Black Hole Theories
| Theory | Event Horizon | Singularity-Free | Flat Geometry | Derived | Scalar-Based | QFT Compatible | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| General Relativity (GR) | Yes | No | No | Yes (Einstein Eq.) | No | Partial (divergent) | Classical singularity model with curved spacetime |
| Loop Quantum Gravity | Yes | Yes (via quantization) | No | Not directly | No | Intended | Quantized spacetime; not yet fully predictive |
| String Theory / Fuzzballs | Yes | Yes (nonlocal cores) | No | Emergent from duality | No | Yes | Requires extra dimensions and dual holographic constructions |
| Einstein–Cartan Theory | Yes | Yes (torsion prevents collapse) | No | Similar to GR | No | Partial | Adds torsion to Einstein equations to avoid singularity |
| Verlinde’s Emergent Gravity | No (reinterpreted) | Yes | Yes | Not derived | Yes (entropic) | Partial | Gravity arises from entropic forces, applied mainly to galaxy scale |
| Conformal Gravity (Mannheim) | Yes | Claimed | No (higher-order tensors) | Modeled | No | Yes | Based on Weyl symmetry and 4th-order field equations |
| NUVO Theory (This Work) | Yes | Yes (kenos) | Yes (modulated flat) | Yes (from ) | Yes (single scalar) | Yes (Minkowski) | Black holes as scalar modulation collapse regions; no curvature, no singularity, observationally indistinguishable from GR outside the kenos |
References
- Misner, C.W.; Thorne, K.S.; Wheeler, J.A. Gravitation; W. H. Freeman, 1973.
- Austin, R.W. From Newton to Planck: A Flat-Space Conformal Theory Bridging General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. Preprints 2025. Preprint available at https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202505.1410/v1.
- Feynman, R.P.; Leighton, R.B.; Sands, M. The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol. II: Mainly Electromagnetism and Matter; Addison-Wesley, 1963.
- Friedmann, A. On the curvature of space. Zeitschrift für Physik 1922, 10, 377–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zee, A. Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell; Princeton University Press, 2010.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).