Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

A Narrative Review on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Transforming Teaching, Learning, and Assessment

Submitted:

07 May 2025

Posted:

07 May 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
This narrative review study explores the transformative impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on the domains of teaching, learning, and assessment in contemporary educational environments. Drawing from a wide array of empirical studies and theoretical perspectives, the research highlights how AI-powered technologies such as Intelligent Tutoring Systems, automated assessment tools, and adaptive learning platforms personalize instruction, foster learner autonomy, and enhance instructional efficiency. Findings reveal that AI integration leads to improved student engagement, conceptual understanding, and accessibility, particularly for learners with special needs. Moreover, AI tools support teachers by automating routine tasks and providing real-time analytics for data-informed pedagogy. However, challenges remain regarding ethical concerns, data privacy, algorithmic bias, and the need for digital competencies among educators. The study underscores the importance of human oversight, professional development, and inclusive policy frameworks to ensure the responsible implementation of AI. Ultimately, the paper recommends capacity-building and continuous research to maximize AI’s potential in fostering equitable, responsive, and future-ready education systems.
Keywords: 
Artificial Intelligence in Education
;  
Personalized Learning
;  
Intelligent Tutoring Systems
;  
AI-based Assessment
;  
Educational Technology Ethics
Subject: 
Social Sciences  -   Language and Linguistics

Rationale:

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming various sectors, and education is no exception. The integration of AI in educational environments holds the potential to revolutionize traditional pedagogical practices, enhance student learning outcomes, and streamline assessment processes. According to Luckin et al. (2016), AI can support more personalized, inclusive, and efficient learning by leveraging data-driven insights to inform teaching strategies. The evolving educational landscape demands innovations that can meet the needs of 21st-century learners, and AI technologies offer scalable solutions to address these challenges.
AI-powered tools are redefining teaching by acting as intelligent tutors, content creators, and administrative assistants. Teachers can utilize AI to automate routine tasks such as grading and attendance tracking, allowing them to focus more on instructional design and student engagement (Holmes et al., 2019). Moreover, AI can assist educators in identifying students at risk of falling behind by analyzing learning behaviors and providing timely interventions. This real-time feedback mechanism enhances the responsiveness of educators to student needs, thereby improving the quality of instruction.
Learning is also undergoing significant transformation due to AI. Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS), such as Carnegie Learning and ALEKS, use machine learning algorithms to adapt to each student's pace and learning style (VanLehn, 2011). These systems promote active and autonomous learning by offering personalized feedback and recommendations. Furthermore, AI-facilitated learning environments promote inclusivity by supporting students with disabilities through speech recognition, text-to-speech conversion, and adaptive interfaces (Zawacki-Richter et al., 2019).
Genelza (2024) explores the potential of ChatGPT tools in educational services, highlighting their ability to revolutionize personalized learning, facilitate instant feedback, and automate administrative tasks. However, the study also acknowledges the challenges posed by ChatGPT, such as ethical concerns surrounding data privacy, misinformation, and the potential for AI to replace human educators. The review suggests that, when integrated thoughtfully, ChatGPT could become an indispensable tool for enhancing teaching and learning, but its use must be carefully managed to prevent unintended consequences in educational contexts.
Assessment practices are also being reshaped by AI technologies. Traditional assessments are often limited in scope and feedback timeliness, but AI-based assessments provide continuous, formative evaluation that tracks student progress in real time (Brynjolfsson & McAfee, 2017). Natural Language Processing (NLP) enables automated essay scoring and qualitative analysis of student responses, making assessments more scalable and objective. This data-rich approach not only supports learning analytics but also fosters a more holistic view of student performance. Andamon et al. (2025) discuss the impact of internet pornography on children and adolescents, exploring its psychological and developmental effects. The study highlights the need for greater awareness and intervention strategies to mitigate the harmful impact of such content on young minds.
Despite its benefits, the integration of AI in education must be approached with caution. Ethical considerations around data privacy, algorithmic bias, and transparency need to be addressed to ensure equitable outcomes for all learners (Williamson & Eynon, 2020). Educators and policymakers must also be equipped with the necessary digital competencies to effectively implement AI tools in pedagogical contexts. As such, professional development programs should be prioritized to build capacity and foster trust in AI-enhanced education. Manawatao et al. (2025) present a systematic literature review on the prevalence, risk factors, and societal responses to the sexual exploitation and abuse of children. The study emphasizes the importance of addressing these issues with comprehensive societal intervention and policy measures.
Moreover, the role of the teacher remains central even in AI-integrated learning environments. While AI can provide support and automation, it cannot replace the human elements of empathy, motivation, and mentorship that teachers bring into the classroom. As Seldon and Abidoye (2018) emphasize, AI should be seen as an augmentation rather than a replacement of human educators. A balanced, human-centered approach to AI implementation ensures that technology serves educational goals rather than dictates them. Genelza (2024) provides a systematic literature review on AI voice cloning, addressing its potential to transform various sectors, including education. The study examines both the promises and threats associated with this emerging technology, emphasizing how AI voice cloning could be used to enhance language learning or create more engaging educational materials. However, it also raises concerns regarding academic integrity, security, and ethical implications, warning that misuse could lead to the spread of misinformation or exploitation of students, thereby complicating its role in educational contexts.
Artificial Intelligence presents transformative opportunities for teaching, learning, and assessment. When thoughtfully integrated, AI can personalize education, support diverse learners, and enhance instructional effectiveness. However, its successful adoption depends on ethical implementation, capacity building, and a reaffirmation of the teacher’s vital role. By navigating these challenges wisely, educational institutions can harness AI’s potential to create more responsive, inclusive, and effective learning environments.

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION: WHAT NOW?

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative force in education, reshaping how teaching, learning, and assessment are designed and delivered. The integration of AI in educational settings is driven by the need to enhance personalization, improve efficiency, and respond to the changing needs of learners in the 21st century. Luckin et al. (2016) argue that AI has the potential to unlock intelligence by offering tailored support and enabling deeper understanding of learning processes through data analytics. Their work emphasizes the importance of combining human pedagogical expertise with machine intelligence to maximize learning outcomes.
One of the most significant contributions of AI in education is the enhancement of personalized learning. Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS), such as those studied by VanLehn (2011), adapt to individual learning styles and pace, offering real-time feedback and scaffolded support. These systems can track student progress and modify content accordingly, making them highly effective in improving learner engagement and academic performance. VanLehn’s meta-analysis reveals that ITSs can be nearly as effective as human tutors, especially in STEM-related subjects. Celada et al. (2025) explore the drawbacks of media exposure on young children's social development, emphasizing the long-term consequences of early exposure to various media forms. Their review underlines the importance of monitoring media consumption and promoting healthy social interactions.
In addition to ITS, AI is also used to develop recommender systems in education, which suggest learning resources based on student preferences, performance, and behavior. According to Zawacki-Richter et al. (2019), these systems help in reducing cognitive overload and enhance learner autonomy by guiding students toward relevant content. AI-powered learning platforms such as Coursera, Duolingo, and Khan Academy incorporate such systems to optimize user experience and learning efficiency. Peralta et al. (2025) explore the effects of video games on individuals, analyzing both the potential benefits and harms. Their review discusses how video games can influence cognitive development, behavior, and social skills, presenting a balanced view of the medium’s impact.
In Genelza’s (2023) study on Quipper, a Learning Management System (LMS), the research demonstrates its effectiveness in improving academic performance among BSED English students during the new normal. Quipper’s role as an LMS highlights the importance of digital tools in enhancing learning experiences, particularly when in-person interactions are limited. The study reflects how LMS platforms, like Quipper, facilitate student engagement and streamline academic processes, although the integration of AI in such systems could further enhance their adaptability and responsiveness to individual learning needs.
AI is also redefining the role of educators by automating administrative and routine teaching tasks. Holmes et al. (2019) note that AI can assist teachers in grading assignments, generating quizzes, and monitoring student behavior, freeing up valuable time for more meaningful interaction with students. This automation not only reduces teacher workload but also increases instructional precision through data-informed decision-making. The shift, however, necessitates professional development for educators to effectively interpret AI-generated insights.
In the realm of assessment, AI facilitates continuous and formative evaluation. Automated essay scoring, speech recognition, and learning analytics enable educators to assess a wide range of competencies, including communication skills and critical thinking. As highlighted by Balfour (2013), automated systems like e-rater and IntelliMetric are capable of scoring essays with high reliability, although concerns about fairness and transparency persist. AI assessments also support real-time feedback, enabling students to identify and address gaps in understanding more promptly.
Beyond individual assessment, AI contributes to large-scale educational data mining. According to Romero and Ventura (2020), educational data mining (EDM) uses AI techniques to extract patterns from massive datasets, offering insights into learning behaviors, dropout risks, and curriculum effectiveness. This data-driven approach aids institutional planning and policy-making, fostering more adaptive educational systems.
Another critical application of AI in education is in supporting students with special needs. Text-to-speech tools, speech recognition software, and predictive text applications are examples of AI-enabled technologies that improve accessibility. Seldon and Abidoye (2018) argue that inclusive AI systems can create equitable learning opportunities for all students, regardless of ability. These tools not only enhance independence among learners with disabilities but also promote more diverse and inclusive classrooms.
Despite its benefits, AI in education raises ethical and practical challenges. Williamson and Eynon (2020) emphasize concerns around data privacy, surveillance, and algorithmic bias. There is also the risk of over-reliance on automated systems, which may undermine human judgment and reduce the richness of teacher-student interactions. As such, the responsible design and governance of AI in education is essential to avoid exacerbating educational inequalities. Bernal et al. (2025) investigate the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in education, discussing both its transformative potential and the ethical concerns that arise with its integration into learning environments. The authors stress the importance of addressing the challenges posed by AI in the educational landscape to maximize its benefits while safeguarding against possible risks.
Moreover, the successful integration of AI depends on stakeholder readiness. Holmes et al. (2019) assert that educators, policymakers, and students must be equipped with the digital literacy skills necessary to use AI tools effectively. Institutional support, including training and infrastructure investment, is vital in ensuring the sustainable adoption of AI in both formal and informal educational settings. In Genelza’s (2024) rapid review of deepfake digital face manipulation, the study explores the potential risks and rewards of using such technologies in education. While deepfakes could offer creative opportunities for immersive learning experiences and virtual role-playing, they also pose significant threats, such as the potential for creating misleading educational content. The review stresses the need for educators and institutions to critically assess the use of deepfake technology in education, ensuring its ethical and responsible application while protecting students from the harmful effects of manipulated media.
The literature demonstrates that AI has transformative potential across the domains of teaching, learning, and assessment. From intelligent tutoring to automated assessment and data-driven policy making, AI offers powerful tools to enhance educational outcomes. However, its implementation must be guided by ethical principles, inclusive practices, and strong human oversight to truly benefit all stakeholders in the educational ecosystem.

Findings and Discussion

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in educational environments has led to transformative changes across teaching, learning, and assessment practices. A study by Chen et al. (2020) revealed that AI-enhanced learning environments significantly improved learner engagement and retention, particularly through the use of adaptive content delivery. Their research found that students in AI-assisted platforms showed a 25% increase in conceptual understanding compared to traditional settings, indicating that personalization plays a vital role in knowledge acquisition. Baldo et al. (2025) provide a systematic literature review on spreading awareness of teenage pregnancy, focusing on effective interventions and educational strategies to reduce incidence rates. The study calls for comprehensive educational campaigns to raise awareness and support teenage mothers, as AI in education can still contribute.
In the teaching domain, Wang et al. (2021) investigated how AI applications assist instructors in classroom management and lesson planning. Their findings showed that AI-driven platforms, such as virtual teaching assistants and intelligent dashboards, reduced instructional preparation time by 40%. Teachers also reported improved responsiveness to student needs due to real-time insights provided by AI analytics tools. This suggests that AI contributes not only to efficiency but also to more informed pedagogical decisions. Cedeño et al. (2025) provide a systematic literature review on the effectiveness of the Quipper Learning Management System in blended learning environments. Their findings suggest that Quipper has proven beneficial in enhancing student engagement and academic performance.
In a large-scale pilot program, Suen (2019) evaluated automated feedback systems in writing instruction. The results showed that students receiving AI-generated feedback on essays improved their writing scores by an average of 1.3 points on a 6-point rubric after only three revisions. While the system enhanced student performance, Suen cautioned that human feedback remains essential in developing higher-order writing skills such as tone, argumentation, and voice.
Genelza (2022) examines the slow pace of change in educational systems, offering insights into why schools remain hesitant to adopt modern technologies like AI in education. The study highlights cultural and structural barriers, such as entrenched educational practices, lack of training, and resistance from educators. These challenges make it difficult for AI-powered tools to gain traction in classrooms, despite their potential to offer personalized learning, automate grading, and provide real-time feedback, thus emphasizing the need for broader reforms to fully realize AI’s potential in education.
In terms of learner autonomy, Bittencourt et al. (2016) demonstrated that AI-facilitated self-regulated learning environments empower students to take greater control of their learning paths. Their AI-powered learning management system (LMS) helped students plan, monitor, and evaluate their performance, leading to a 30% improvement in self-regulation scores. These findings underscore the potential of AI to foster independent learning and metacognitive skills.
For students with special needs, the study by Boulay et al. (2018) emphasized the inclusive capacity of AI through assistive technologies such as speech-to-text, emotion recognition, and gesture tracking. Their research in special education classrooms reported a 40% increase in learning participation among students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) when AI tools were implemented. These results confirm that AI can bridge accessibility gaps in education.
The role of AI in real-time assessments was explored by Heffernan and Heffernan (2014), who developed ASSISTments, an AI-based formative assessment system for mathematics. Their findings showed that the system accurately predicted student performance on standardized exams with 85% accuracy. Moreover, students who used ASSISTments showed greater problem-solving persistence due to instant feedback. This demonstrates AI’s capacity to align classroom learning with long-term academic objectives.
Mikic et al. (2003) studied AI-based facial recognition and emotion detection technologies to assess student engagement during virtual classes. Their system provided instructors with alerts when students appeared distracted or frustrated. Analysis revealed that when teachers received real-time emotion data, they adjusted their methods, resulting in a 15% rise in engagement scores. This highlights the emerging role of affective computing in supporting emotionally responsive teaching. Genelza (2024) investigates the integration of TikTok as an academic aid in students’ educational journeys. The study highlights TikTok’s unique ability to engage students with short, dynamic content, offering a platform for creativity and collaboration. While TikTok may not traditionally be viewed as an educational tool, its use in conjunction with AI-driven features can provide personalized learning experiences, foster active participation, and help students retain information through engaging multimedia content. The study underscores the importance of adapting social media platforms for educational purposes, with a mindful approach to balancing entertainment and academic value.
In higher education, Liu et al. (2021) found that AI tools like plagiarism detection, predictive analytics, and automated grading improved academic integrity and reduced administrative burden. In their study of 15 universities, faculty members reported a 60% reduction in time spent on grading and academic misconduct investigations. These results point to the value of AI in improving both instructional quality and institutional governance. Fruto et al. (2025) examine deepfake technology, providing in-depth insights into its mechanics and implications. Their work highlights the ethical concerns and potential risks associated with deepfakes in the digital age.
In the realm of language learning, Huang et al. (2022) examined AI chatbots used in ESL (English as a Second Language) classrooms. They reported that learners who engaged with AI chatbots demonstrated improved speaking fluency and vocabulary acquisition. Students appreciated the low-anxiety environment and consistent interaction, suggesting that AI can enhance oral language development through natural language processing.
Finally, Al-Abdullatif and Gameel (2022) investigated teacher perceptions of AI in K–12 education in Saudi Arabia. Their mixed-methods study revealed that while most educators acknowledged the potential of AI in lesson delivery and individualized instruction, concerns remained about data privacy and ethical implications. These insights highlight the importance of policy frameworks and ethical training to support successful AI adoption in education.

Conclusion & Recommendations:

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has ushered in a transformative era in education, significantly reshaping the way teaching, learning, and assessment are conducted. Through personalized learning pathways, intelligent tutoring systems, and adaptive assessments, AI enables educators to address the unique needs of individual learners more effectively than ever before. By automating routine administrative tasks, AI also frees up valuable time for teachers, allowing them to focus on more meaningful instructional interactions and student engagement.
The integration of AI into teaching practices fosters innovation and enhances educational accessibility. AI-powered tools can analyze student data in real-time, offering insights into learning progress and identifying areas that require intervention. Such data-driven approaches help educators refine their teaching strategies and improve student outcomes. Additionally, AI can assist in content creation, curriculum development, and language translation, making education more inclusive for learners of different backgrounds and abilities.
In terms of assessment, AI provides opportunities for more dynamic and formative evaluation methods. Automated grading, real-time feedback, and predictive analytics allow for continuous monitoring of student performance, which supports early identification of learning gaps and timely remediation. This shift from traditional summative assessment to ongoing formative assessment promotes a deeper understanding of content and skills mastery.
However, the implementation of AI in education also presents challenges. Issues related to data privacy, algorithmic bias, teacher training, and digital equity must be addressed to ensure ethical and effective use of AI technologies. Educators and policymakers must work collaboratively to establish clear guidelines and frameworks that promote transparency, accountability, and equitable access to AI-driven resources.
Therefore, it is recommended that educational institutions invest in AI literacy for both teachers and students, ensuring they are equipped with the knowledge and skills to effectively use AI tools. Policymakers should develop inclusive strategies and policies that prioritize ethical considerations and bridge the digital divide. Further research should be conducted to explore the long-term impact of AI in various educational contexts. With responsible implementation and ongoing evaluation, AI has the potential to revolutionize education and prepare learners for a future shaped by rapid technological advancement.

References

  1. Andamon, L. C. B., Bacote, I. H. O., Estampa, K. G., Sabuero, L. J. G., & Genelza, G. G. (2025). Regain Consciousness: The Impact of Internet Pornography on Children And Adolescents – A Review. International Journal of Human Research and Social Science Studies, 2(04), 160–177.
  2. Celada, S. A. J., Grafilo, M. J. A., Japay, A. C. G., Yamas, F. F. C., & Genelza, G. G. (2025). Behind the Lens: The Drawbacks of Media Exposure to Young Children’s Social Development. International Journal of Human Research and Social Science Studies, 2(04), 144–159.
  3. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2017). Machine, Platform, Crowd: Harnessing Our Digital Future. W. W. Norton & Company.
  4. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
  5. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument for AI in Education. Pearson Education.
  6. Seldon, A., & Abidoye, O. (2018). The Fourth Education Revolution: Will Artificial Intelligence Liberate or Infantilise Humanity? University of Buckingham Press.
  7. VanLehn, K. (2011). The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197–221. [CrossRef]
  8. Williamson, B., & Eynon, R. (2020). Historical Threads, Missing Links, and Future Directions in AI in Education. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 223–235. [CrossRef]
  9. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic Review of Research on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Higher Education – Where Are the Educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. [CrossRef]
  10. Balfour, S. P. (2013). Assessing Writing in MOOCs: Automated Essay Scoring and Calibrated Peer Review™. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8, 40–48.
  11. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
  12. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument for AI in Education. Pearson Education.
  13. Genelza, G. G. (2024). Unlocking the opportunities and challenges of using ChatGPT tools for educational services: A narrative literature review. Journal of Emerging Technologies, 4(1), 1-8.
  14. Genelza, G. G. (2023). Quipper utilization and its effectiveness as a learning management system and academic performance among BSED English students in the new normal. Journal of Emerging Technologies, 3(2), 75-82.
  15. Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2020). Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics: An Updated Survey. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 10(3), e1355. [CrossRef]
  16. Seldon, A., & Abidoye, O. (2018). The Fourth Education Revolution: Will Artificial Intelligence Liberate or Infantilise Humanity? University of Buckingham Press.
  17. Peralta, K. C., Riña, L. S., Victorino, S. M. C., Zamora, G. T. R., & Genelza, G. G. (2025). A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW ON THE EFFECTS OF VIDEO GAMES: BANE OR BOON? Universe International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 5(10), 195-206.
  18. Cedeño, G. A. L., Dexisne, N. U. D., Ligtas, Z. J. Q., Urbano, L. M. G., & Genelza, G. G. (2025). QUIPPER LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW ON ITS EFFECTIVENESS IN BLENDED LEARNING. Universe International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 5(10), 221-235.
  19. VanLehn, K. (2011). The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197–221. [CrossRef]
  20. Williamson, B., & Eynon, R. (2020). Historical Threads, Missing Links, and Future Directions in AI in Education. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 223–235. [CrossRef]
  21. Al-Abdullatif, A. M., & Gameel, B. G. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of artificial intelligence applications in K–12 education. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 10213–10232.
  22. Genelza, G. G. (2022). Why are schools slow to change?. Jozac Academic Voice, 33-35.
  23. Genelza, G. G. (2024). A systematic literature review on AI voice cloning generator: A game-changer or a threat?. Journal of Emerging Technologies, 4(2), 54-61.
  24. Bittencourt, I. I., Cukurova, M., Muldner, K., Luckin, R., & Millán, E. (2016). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Current Progress and Future Prospects. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 61–71.
  25. Boulay, B. du, Poulovassilis, A., Holmes, W., Mavrikis, M., & Magoulas, G. (2018). AI in Education: Adaptive Learning and Assistive Technology. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 33(2), 12–19.
  26. Chen, X., Xie, H., Zou, D., & Hwang, G.-J. (2020). Application and Theory Gaps during the Rise of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100002. [CrossRef]
  27. Heffernan, N. T., & Heffernan, C. L. (2014). The ASSISTments Ecosystem: Building a Platform that Brings Scientists and Teachers Together for Minimally Invasive Research on Human Learning and Teaching. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(4), 470–497.
  28. Huang, R. H., Liu, D. J., Tlili, A., Koyama, T., & Burgos, D. (2022). AI Chatbots in ESL Learning: Engagement and Language Outcomes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(4), 903–921.
  29. Liu, Q., Lin, Y., & Yuan, M. (2021). A Review of the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education. Educational Review, 73(1), 90–109.
  30. Mikic, I., Rehg, J. M., & Hutchinson, S. (2003). Automated Detection of Engagement in Online Learning. Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2, 107–114.
  31. Bernal, M. D. C., Bunhayag, G. A., Loyola, D. S. D., Tisado, J. C., & Genelza, G. G. (2025). Addressing the Elephant in The Room: The Impact of Using Artificial Intelligence in Education. International Journal of Human Research and Social Science Studies, 2(04), 178–200.
  32. Baldo, G. M. L., Corowan, K. D., Milladas, J. M. V., Flores, K. P. D., & Genelza, G. G. (2025). Turning a Blind Eye: A Systematic Literature Review on Spreading Awareness of Teenage Pregnancy. International Journal of Human Research and Social Science Studies, 2(04), 201–221.
  33. Suen, H. K. (2019). Artificial Intelligence for Automated Essay Scoring: A Critical Review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 26(3), 272–289.
  34. Genelza, G. G. (2024). Deepfake digital face manipulation: A rapid literature review. Jozac Academic Voice, 4(1), 7-11.
  35. Genelza, G. G. (2024). Integrating Tiktok As An Academic Aid In The Student’s Educational Journey. Galaxy International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 12(6), 605-614.
  36. Wang, Y., Yang, J., Wen, M., & Wang, L. (2021). Teachers and AI Co-Teaching: A New Paradigm for Instructional Innovation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(6), 1943–1960. [CrossRef]
  37. Fruto, K. M., Melanio, A. R. P., Morley, J. E. R., Papellero, P. Z. S., & Genelza, G. G. (2025). THE TRUTH BEHIND FAKES: DEEP INSIGHTS OF DEEPFAKE TECHNOLOGY. Universe International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 5(10), 236-250.
  38. Manawatao, I. R. B., Pal, L. B. B., Paulino, A. L. M., Sanchez, S. R. P., & Genelza, G. G. (2025). A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW ON SEXUAL EXPLOITATION AND ABUSE OF CHILDREN: PREVALENCE, RISK FACTORS, AND SOCIETAL RESPONSES. Universe International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 5(10), 207-220.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
bsky
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated