Submitted:
16 April 2025
Posted:
18 April 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Animals
2.2. Diets and Experimental Design
2.3. Intramammary Infection
2.4. DMI, Water Intake, Milk Yield, Milk Quality, and Rectal Temperature
2.5. Milk Bacteria Sampling and Culture
2.6. Blood Collection and Analysis
2.7. Phagocytosis Assay
2.8. Migration Assay
2.9. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Overall Response to Intramammary Infection (IMI)
3.2. Response of Ewes Fed with Chicory-Plantain and Se-Yeast
4. Discussion
4.1. Characterization of the IMI Model
4.2. The Type of Silage Had A Minimal Effect on the Response to IMI
4.3. Se Supplementation Does Not Affect the Response to IMI
4.4. Limitations
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| AOPP | Advanced Oxidation Protein Products |
| BHBA | β-hydroxybutyric acid |
| FRAP | Ferric-reducing ability of the plasma |
| IL6 | Interleukin 6 |
| IMI | Intramammary infection |
| NEFA | Non-esterified fatty acid |
| NO | Nitric Oxide |
| SCC | Milk somatic cells |
Appendix A
Appendix A.2.
- Samples were plated on MacConkey (Gram-negative specific) and blood agar with esculin (sheep blood, supports general growth).
- Plates were placed in a humidified incubator at 37C
- Agar plates were observed for growth at 24 and 48 hours after inoculation.
- If no growth on blood or MacConkey agars was observed after 48 hours, the sample was identified as “No Growth”
- If growth occurred on MacConkey agar after 24 hours, colonies were identified as gram-negative organisms. Identification was by colony morphology on blood and MacConkey agar.
- If growth occurred on blood agar but not on MacConkey agar at 24 or 48 hours, colonies were identified as gram-positive organisms.
- Initial identification was based on colony morphology on blood agar.
-
Organisms were identified as Staphylococcus or Streptococcus organisms using the catalase test and esculin fermentation on the plate:
- Catalase positive = Staphylococcus
- Catalase negative = Streptococcus
-
Staphylococcal organisms were further speciated using the coagulase test and colony morphology:
- Coagulase positive = Staphylococcus aureus
- Coagulase negative = “Staphylococcus species”
- 7.
- If 2-3 species were present on the blood agar, the sample was classified as mixed. If more than 3 species occurred on the blood agar, the sample was classified as contaminated.
- 8.
- Organisms not identifiable with colony morphology or basic biochemical tests were evaluated by gram stain and microscopic evaluation.
References
- Rollin E, Dhuyvetter KC, Overton MW. The cost of clinical mastitis in the first 30 days of lactation: An economic modeling tool. Prev Vet Med. 2015;122(3):257-64. Epub 20151107. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hogeveen H, Steeneveld W, Wolf CA. Production Diseases Reduce the Efficiency of Dairy Production: A Review of the Results, Methods, and Approaches Regarding the Economics of Mastitis. Annual Review of Resource Economics. 2019;11(Volume 11, 2019):289-312. [CrossRef]
- Cheng WN, Han SG. Bovine mastitis: risk factors, therapeutic strategies, and alternative treatments - A review. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2020;33(11):1699-713. Epub 20200512. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Weersink A, Vanleeuwen J, Chi J. Direct Production Losses and Treatment Costs due to Four Dairy Cattle Diseases. Advances in Dairy Technology. 2002;14.
- Ruegg, PL. Management of mastitis on organic and conventional dairy farms. J Anim Sci. 2009;87(13 Suppl):43-55. Epub 20080926. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- White DG, McDermott PF. Emergence and Transfer of Antibacterial Resistance. Journal of Dairy Science. 2001;84:E151-E5. [CrossRef]
- Wilson RL, Bionaz M, MacAdam JW, Beauchemin KA, Naumann HD, Ates S. Milk production, nitrogen utilization, and methane emissions of dairy cows grazing grass, forb, and legume-based pastures. J Anim Sci. 2020;98(7). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saeed M, Abd El-Hac ME, Alagawany M, A. Arain M, Arif M, A. Mirza M, et al. Chicory (Cichorium intybus) Herb: Chemical Composition, Pharmacology, Nutritional and Healthical Applications. Int J Pharmacol. 2017;13:351-60. [CrossRef]
- Gardiner CA, J. CT, C. CK, J. DH, R. EG, and de Klein CAM. Potential for forage diet manipulation in New Zealand pasture ecosystems to mitigate ruminant urine derived N2O emissions: a review. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 2016;59(3):301-17. [CrossRef]
- Navarrete S, Kemp PD, Pain SJ, Back PJ. Bioactive compounds, aucubin and acteoside, in plantain (Plantago lanceolata L.) and their effect on in vitro rumen fermentation. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2016;222:158-67. [CrossRef]
- Park, KS. Aucubin, a naturally occurring iridoid glycoside inhibits TNF-alpha-induced inflammatory responses through suppression of NF-kappaB activation in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Cytokine. 2013;62(3):407-12. Epub 20130420. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sordillo, LM. Mammary Gland Immunobiology and Resistance to Mastitis. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2018;34(3):507-23. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Avery JC, Hoffmann PR. Selenium, Selenoproteins, and Immunity. Nutrients. 2018;10(9). Epub 20180901. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jaaf S, Batty B, Krueger A, Estill CT, Bionaz M. Selenium biofortified alfalfa hay fed in low quantities improves selenium status and glutathione peroxidase activity in transition dairy cows and their calves. J Dairy Res. 2020;87(2):184-90. Epub 20200416. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hall JA, Vorachek WR, Stewart WC, Gorman ME, Mosher WD, Pirelli GJ, et al. Selenium supplementation restores innate and humoral immune responses in footrot-affected sheep. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e82572. Epub 20131205. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Smith KL, Harrison JH, Hancock DD, Todhunter DA, Conrad HR. Effect of vitamin E and selenium supplementation on incidence of clinical mastitis and duration of clinical symptoms. J Dairy Sci. 1984;67(6):1293-300. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Council, NR. Nutrient Requirements of Small Ruminants: Sheep, Goats, Cervids, and New World Camelids. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2007. 384 p.
- Rosa F, Osorio JS, Trevisi E, Yanqui-Rivera F, Estill CT, Bionaz M. 2,4-Thiazolidinedione Treatment Improves the Innate Immune Response in Dairy Goats with Induced Subclinical Mastitis. PPAR Res. 2017;2017:7097450. Epub 20170627. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Addis MF, Pisanu S, Marogna G, Cubeddu T, Pagnozzi D, Cacciotto C, et al. Production and release of antimicrobial and immune defense proteins by mammary epithelial cells following Streptococcus uberis infection of sheep. Infect Immun. 2013;81(9):3182-97. Epub 20130617. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ford H, Hasan D, Ates S, Puerto-Hernandez G, Klopfenstein JJ, Trevisi E, et al. Feeding chicory silage, but not Se-yeast or a single injection of inorganic Se, affects metabolism, fat in milk, and type I immunity in transition ewes. Frontiers in Animal Science. 2024;5. [CrossRef]
- Ginn RE, Packard VS, Fox TL. Evaluation of the 3M Dry Medium Culture Plate (Petrifilm SM) Method for Determining Numbers of Bacteria in Raw Milk (1). J Food Prot. 1984;47(10):753-5. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Michelotti TC, Trevisi E, Osorio JS. An Exploration of the Effects of an Early Postpartum Intravenous Infusion with Carnosic Acid on Physiological Responses of Transition Dairy Cows. Antioxidants (Basel). 2021;10(9). Epub 20210916. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jahan N, Minuti A, Trevisi E. Assessment of immune response in periparturient dairy cows using ex vivo whole blood stimulation assay with lipopolysaccharides and carrageenan skin test. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2015;165(3-4):119-26. Epub 20150411. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alba DF, da Rosa G, Hanauer D, Saldanha TF, Souza CF, Baldissera MD, et al. Subclinical mastitis in Lacaune sheep: Causative agents, impacts on milk production, milk quality, oxidative profiles and treatment efficacy of ceftiofur. Microb Pathog. 2019;137:103732. Epub 20190907. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moyes KM, Larsen T, Sorensen P, Ingvartsen KL. Changes in various metabolic parameters in blood and milk during experimental Escherichia coli mastitis for primiparous Holstein dairy cows during early lactation. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2014;5(1):47. Epub 20141017. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Randolph HE, Erwin RE. Influence of mastitis on properties of milk. X. Fatty acid composition. J Dairy Sci. 1974;57(8):865-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bionaz M, Loor JJ. Gene networks driving bovine milk fat synthesis during the lactation cycle. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:366. Epub 20080731. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bionaz M, Trevisi E, Calamari L, Librandi F, Ferrari A, Bertoni G. Plasma paraoxonase, health, inflammatory conditions, and liver function in transition dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2007;90(4):1740-50. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Robinson BE, Weber H. Dehydration despite drinking: beyond the BUN/Creatinine ratio. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2004;5(2 Suppl):S67-71. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vasileiou NGC, Chatzopoulos DC, Sarrou S, Fragkou IA, Katsafadou AI, Mavrogianni VS, et al. Role of staphylococci in mastitis in sheep. J Dairy Res. 2019;86(3):254-66. Epub 20190819. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nwafor IC, Shale K, Achilonu MC. Chemical Composition and Nutritive Benefits of Chicory (Cichorium intybus) as an Ideal Complementary and/or Alternative Livestock Feed Supplement. ScientificWorldJournal. 2017;2017:7343928. Epub 20171213. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pena-Espinoza M, Valente AH, Thamsborg SM, Simonsen HT, Boas U, Enemark HL, et al. Antiparasitic activity of chicory (Cichorium intybus) and its natural bioactive compounds in livestock: a review. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11(1):475. Epub 20180822. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huang H, Szumacher-Strabel M, Patra AK, Ślusarczyk S, Lechniak D, Vazirigohar M, et al. Chemical and phytochemical composition, in vitro ruminal fermentation, methane production, and nutrient degradability of fresh and ensiled Paulownia hybrid leaves. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2021;279:115038. [CrossRef]
- Rufino-Moya PJ, Bertolin JR, Blanco M, Lobon S, Joy M. Fatty acid profile, secondary compounds and antioxidant activities in the fresh forage, hay and silage of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) and sulla (Hedysarum coronarium). J Sci Food Agric. 2022;102(11):4736-43. Epub 20220319. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Martens SD, Hoedtke S, Avila P, Heinritz SN, Zeyner A. Effect of ensiling treatment on secondary compounds and amino acid profile of tropical forage legumes, and implications for their pig feeding potential. J Sci Food Agric. 2014;94(6):1107-15. Epub 20131002. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bochniarz M, Zdzisinska B, Wawron W, Szczubial M, Dabrowski R. Milk and serum IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, and amyloid A concentrations in cows with subclinical mastitis caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Dairy Sci. 2017;100(12):9674-80. Epub 20170928. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Osman KM, Hassan HM, Ibrahim IM, Mikhail MM. The impact of staphylococcal mastitis on the level of milk IL-6, lysozyme and nitric oxide. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010;33(1):85-93. Epub 20081001. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Spittler A, Razenberger M, Kupper H, Kaul M, Hackl W, Boltz-Nitulescu G, et al. Relationship between interleukin-6 plasma concentration in patients with sepsis, monocyte phenotype, monocyte phagocytic properties, and cytokine production. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;31(6):1338-42. Epub 20001122. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Uciechowski P, Dempke WCM. Interleukin-6: A Masterplayer in the Cytokine Network. Oncology. 2020;98(3):131-7. Epub 20200120. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Forcina L, Franceschi C, Musaro A. The hormetic and hermetic role of IL-6. Ageing Res Rev. 2022;80:101697. Epub 20220716. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Silanikove N, Merin U, Shapiro F, Leitner G. Subclinical mastitis in goats is associated with upregulation of nitric oxide-derived oxidative stress that causes reduction of milk antioxidative properties and impairment of its quality. J Dairy Sci. 2014;97(6):3449-55. Epub 20140403. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mezzetti M, Minuti A, Piccioli-Cappelli F, Gabai G, Trevisi E. Administration of an Immune Stimulant during the Transition Period Improved Lipid Metabolism and Rumination without Affecting Inflammatory Status. Animals (Basel). 2019;9(9). Epub 20190828. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tabatabaee N, Heidarpour M, Khoramian B. Milk metabolites, proteins and oxidative stress markers in dairy cows suffering from Staphylococcus aureus subclinical mastitis with or without spontaneous cure. J Dairy Res. 2021;88(3):326-9. Epub 20210812. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang D, Jia D, He R, Lian S, Wang J, Wu R. Association Between Serum Selenium Level and Subclinical Mastitis in Dairy Cattle. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2021;199(4):1389-96. Epub 20200625. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jing H, Chen Y, Qiu C, Guo MY. LncRNAs Transcriptome Analysis Revealed Potential Mechanisms of Selenium to Mastitis in Dairy Cows. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2022;200(10):4316-24. Epub 20220111. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Malbe M, Klaassen M, Fang W, Myllys V, Vikerpuur M, Nyholm K, et al. Comparisons of selenite and selenium yeast feed supplements on Se-incorporation, mastitis and leucocyte function in Se-deficient dairy cows. Zentralbl Veterinarmed A. 1995;42(2):111-21. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Smith KL, Hogan JS, Weiss WP. Dietary vitamin E and selenium affect mastitis and milk quality. J Anim Sci. 1997;75(6):1659-65. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Salman S, Khol-Parisini A, Schafft H, Lahrssen-Wiederholt M, Hulan HW, Dinse D, et al. The role of dietary selenium in bovine mammary gland health and immune function. Anim Health Res Rev. 2009;10(1):21-34. Epub 20090206. [CrossRef] [PubMed]










| Treatment Group | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GCT | GSY | CPCT | CPSY | |
| Ingredients, % DM | ||||
| Grass silage | 50.0 | 50.0 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Chicory silage | 0.00 | 0.00 | 25.0 | 25.0 |
| Plantain silage | 0.00 | 0.00 | 25.0 | 25.0 |
| Corn | 16.5 | 16.5 | 20.7 | 20.7 |
| Barley | 20.5 | 20.5 | 14.8 | 14.8 |
| Soybean meal | 11.4 | 11.4 | 13.2 | 13.2 |
| Alfalfa meal | 0.62 | 0.00 | 0.62 | 0.00 |
| Se-yeast | 0.00 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 0.62 |
| CaCO3 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.40 | 0.40 |
| NaCl | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 |
| Mineral mix1 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| Chemical composition* | ||||
| CP % | 14.7 | 14.7 | 14.7 | 14.7 |
| NDF % | 34.9 | 34.9 | 30.7 | 30.7 |
| NFC % | 42.5 | 42.5 | 44.2 | 44.2 |
| Ca % | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.82 | 0.82 |
| P % | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.34 | 0.34 |
| Ca/P | 2.19 | 2.19 | 2.41 | 2.41 |
| ME Mcal/kg DM | 2.69 | 2.69 | 2.47 | 2.47 |
| Parameter1 | Unit | Chicory | Grass | P-value | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPCT | CPSY | GCT | GSY | SEM | F | Se | F*Se | F*T | Se*T | F*Se*T | ||
| Rectal Temp. | ℃ | 39.2 | 39.0 | 39.2 | 39.1 | 0.07 | 0.28 | 0.01 | 0.45 | 0.09 | 0.76 | 0.05 |
| DMI | g/d | 1879 | 1997 | 2226 | 2221 | 163 | 0.07 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.02 | 0.46 | 0.99 |
| Milk Yield | mL/d | 470 | 561 | 649 | 557 | 64.8 | 0.19 | 1.00 | 0.17 | 0.66 | 0.52 | 0.32 |
| Water intake | L/d | 4.03 | 2.10 | 3.32 | 2.48 | 0.56 | 0.75 | 0.01 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.55 | 0.74 |
| Bacteria count | log2/mL | 4.20b | 4.36b | 2.04c | 5.88a | 0.69 | 0.79 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.18 | 0.53 | 0.70 |
| SCC | log2(×103) | 11.0 | 11.0 | 10.7 | 11.3 | 0.28 | 0.80 | 0.35 | 0.26 | 0.44 | 0.03 | 0.31 |
| Lactose | % | 3.24 | 3.43 | 3.44 | 3.29 | 0.22 | 0.90 | 0.93 | 0.43 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.47 |
| Protein | % | 6.14 | 5.69 | 5.46 | 5.63 | 0.19 | 0.05 | 0.44 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 0.18 | 0.50 |
| Fat | % | 7.11 | 6.26 | 6.33 | 5.94 | 0.29 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.10 | 0.30 | 0.64 | 0.87 |
| Solids | % | 17.9 | 16.4 | 16.2 | 16.0 | 0.54 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.18 | 0.11 | 0.64 | 0.95 |
| SNF | % | 10.6 | 10.3 | 10.1 | 10.1 | 0.26 | 0.14 | 0.59 | 0.53 | 0.11 | 0.76 | 0.83 |
| Other Solids | % | 4.45 | 4.61 | 4.60 | 4.45 | 0.24 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.50 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.53 |
| NPN | mg/dL | 26.9 | 25.0 | 26.9 | 26.6 | 1.44 | 0.56 | 0.44 | 0.54 | 0.18 | 0.41 | 0.76 |
| MUN | mg/dL | 21.5 | 21.3 | 23.3 | 23.3 | 1.34 | 0.24 | 0.51 | 0.83 | 0.45 | 0.59 | 0.84 |
| C16:0 | % | 2.45 | 2.03 | 2.14 | 1.97 | 0.15 | 0.19 | 0.04 | 0.36 | 0.29 | 0.63 | 0.81 |
| C18:0 | % | 0.38a | 0.30ab | 0.28b | 0.33ab | 0.03 | 0.22 | 0.58 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.74 | 0.74 |
| C18:1 | % | 0.45a | 0.15b | 0.24b | 0.32ab | 0.09 | 0.77 | 0.16 | 0.02 | 0.08 | 1.00 | 0.19 |
| De novo FA | % | 2.94 | 2.62 | 2.55 | 2.31 | 0.14 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.76 | 0.31 | 0.60 | 0.66 |
| Mixed FA | % | 2.51 | 2.07 | 2.20 | 2.08 | 0.15 | 0.21 | 0.04 | 0.38 | 0.29 | 0.62 | 0.79 |
| Preformed FA | % | 1.61a | 1.18b | 1.17b | 1.37ab | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.22 | <0.01 | 0.28 | 0.83 | 0.58 |
| Unsaturated FA | % | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.02 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.16 | 0.69 | 0.58 | 0.39 |
| Acetone | % | 0.20ab | 0.13b | 0.14b | 0.24a | 0.04 | 0.43 | 0.69 | 0.03 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 0.17 |
| BHBA | % | 0.33 | 0.28 | 0.29 | 0.36 | 0.05 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.17 | 0.27 | 0.13 | 0.45 |
| De novo FA | % FA | 41.6b | 44.8a | 43.3ab | 40.7b | 1.15 | 0.28 | 0.77 | 0.01 | 0.11 | 0.91 | 0.36 |
| Mixed FA | % FA | 34.7 | 34.6 | 37.2 | 35.3 | 1.11 | 0.15 | 0.35 | 0.40 | 0.30 | 0.94 | 0.75 |
| Preformed FA | % FA | 23.7a | 20.5ab | 19.8b | 24.0a | 1.40 | 0.86 | 0.69 | 0.01 | 0.33 | 0.75 | 0.18 |
| Medium Chain FA | % FA | 13.1 | 13.1 | 13.2 | 13.4 | 0.13 | 0.05 | 0.35 | 0.27 | 0.33 | 0.60 | 0.37 |
| Parameter1 | Unit | Chicory | Grass | P-value2 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPCT | CPSY | GCT | GSY | SEM | F | Se | Time | F*Se | F*T | Se*T | F*Se*T | ||
| Metabolism | |||||||||||||
| Glucose | mM | 4.27 | 4.24 | 4.19 | 4.21 | 0.10 | 0.57 | 0.92 | 0.07 | 0.81 | 0.99 | 0.21 | 0.85 |
| Cholesterol | mM | 1.78 | 1.79 | 2.15 | 1.75 | 0.22 | 0.44 | 0.35 | 0.19 | 0.32 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 0.07 |
| BHBA | mM | 0.51 | 0.56 | 0.43 | 0.45 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.39 | 0.83 | 0.69 | 0.82 | 0.21 | 0.69 |
| NEFA | mM | 0.31 | 0.35 | 0.31 | 0.34 | 0.01 | 0.80 | 0.08 | 0.22 | 0.66 | 0.47 | 0.25 | 0.97 |
| Total Protein | g/L | 68.4a | 63.0b | 63.1b | 67.1ab | 1.54 | 0.69 | 0.64 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.42 | 0.06 | 0.20 |
| Urea | mM | 6.75 | 6.79 | 7.67 | 7.05 | 0.46 | 0.18 | 0.51 | <0.01 | 0.45 | 0.43 | 0.87 | 0.04 |
| Ca | mM | 2.40 | 2.35 | 2.37 | 2.42 | 0.04 | 0.65 | 0.97 | 0.09 | 0.23 | 0.32 | 0.68 | 0.51 |
| NEFA:Albumin | 0.67 | 0.87 | 0.69 | 0.78 | 0.06 | 0.53 | 0.01 | 0.21 | 0.34 | 0.32 | 0.58 | 0.49 | |
| Acute phase indexes/inflammation/liver status | |||||||||||||
| Albumin | g/L | 30.5 | 29.3 | 30.4 | 29.1 | 0.70 | 0.79 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.95 | 0.15 | 0.38 | 0.36 |
| Haptoglobin | g/L | 0.54 | 0.49 | 0.44 | 0.67 | 0.14 | 0.80 | 0.51 | <0.01 | 0.31 | 0.17 | 0.63 | 0.73 |
| Ceruloplasmin | µM | 2.84 | 3.49 | 3.48 | 3.13 | 0.52 | 0.78 | 0.76 | <0.01 | 0.32 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.05 |
| Paraoxonase | U/L | 170 | 178 | 189 | 192 | 17.1 | 0.32 | 0.73 | <0.01 | 0.88 | 0.23 | 0.61 | 0.37 |
| Zn | mM | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.3 | 11.1 | 0.68 | 0.28 | 0.54 | <0.01 | 0.52 | 0.34 | 0.92 | 0.68 |
| IL6 | pg/mL | 390 | 699 | 1317 | 1590 | 422 | 0.03 | 0.47 | 0.19 | 0.96 | 0.05 | 0.46 | 0.69 |
| IL1B | pg/mL | 396 | 165 | 55 | 156 | 173 | 0.33 | 0.72 | 0.37 | 0.36 | 0.28 | 0.49 | 0.42 |
| Bilirubin | µM | 1.13 | 0.82 | 0.94 | 0.89 | 0.16 | 0.41 | 0.57 | 0.13 | 0.80 | 0.22 | 0.76 | 0.30 |
| GGT | U/L | 74.3a | 63.6b | 61.5b | 71.9ab | 4.08 | 0.57 | 0.97 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.36 | 0.93 | 0.06 |
| Immune system | |||||||||||||
| Globulin | g/L | 37.7a | 33.7ab | 32.8b | 38.0a | 1.63 | 0.85 | 0.70 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 0.19 | 0.05 | 0.13 |
| Albumin:Globulin | 0.81ab | 0.90ab | 0.94a | 0.78b | 0.05 | 0.97 | 0.41 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.23 | |
| Myeloperoxidase | U/L | 494 | 480 | 478 | 538 | 32.5 | 0.51 | 0.46 | <0.01 | 0.24 | 0.26 | 0.10 | 0.52 |
| Oxidative status | |||||||||||||
| AOPP | µM | 61.7 | 62.8 | 61.8 | 63.1 | 4.73 | 0.96 | 0.79 | 0.01 | 0.99 | 0.89 | 0.19 | 0.62 |
| ROM | mg H2O2/dL | 16.3 | 19.6 | 19.8 | 18.9 | 2.33 | 0.55 | 0.59 | <0.01 | 0.36 | 0.04 | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| FRAP | µM | 108 | 111 | 99 | 106 | 2.79 | 0.02 | 0.12 | 0.08 | 0.41 | 0.37 | 0.31 | 0.77 |
| ROM/FRAP | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.02 | 0.25 | 0.92 | <0.01 | 0.28 | 0.02 | 0.25 | 0.19 | |
| NOX | µM | 50.3 | 52.8 | 50.9 | 51.4 | 1.88 | 0.83 | 0.43 | 0.42 | 0.57 | 0.74 | 0.02 | 0.54 |
| NO2 | µM | 14.9 | 14.3 | 15.2 | 16.2 | 0.91 | 0.23 | 0.82 | 0.31 | 0.35 | 0.08 | 0.40 | 0.49 |
| NO3 | µM | 35.4 | 38.5 | 35.7 | 35.2 | 1.95 | 0.43 | 0.49 | 0.80 | 0.33 | 0.57 | <0.01 | 0.28 |
| Parameter1 | Unit | Chicory | Grass | P-value2 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPCT | CPSY | GCT | GSY | SEM | F | Se | Time | F*Se | F*T | Se*T | F*Se*T | ||
| WBC | 103/ml | 10.8 | 12.1 | 9.2 | 12.5 | 1.31 | 0.76 | 0.28 | 0.25 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.96 |
| Lymphocytes | 103/ml | 6.20 | 6.07 | 5.42 | 7.62 | 0.65 | 0.53 | 0.10 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.55 | 0.03 | 1.00 |
| Monocytes | 103/ml | 0.054 | 0.051 | 0.046 | 0.062 | 0.006 | 0.82 | 0.28 | 0.21 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Neutrophils | 103/ml | 4.40 | 4.00 | 3.73 | 4.58 | 0.69 | 0.94 | 0.73 | 0.28 | 0.33 | 0.23 | 0.59 | 0.87 |
| Lymphocytes | % | 58.5 | 61.4 | 59.7 | 62.3 | 2.82 | 0.68 | 0.29 | 0.09 | 0.94 | 0.58 | 0.87 | 0.89 |
| Monocytes | % | 0.50 | 0.51 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.01 | 0.36 | 0.84 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.29 | 0.32 | 0.94 |
| Neutrophils | % | 41.0 | 38.1 | 39.8 | 37.2 | 2.82 | 0.68 | 0.30 | 0.09 | 0.94 | 0.58 | 0.86 | 0.89 |
| RBC | 106/µL | 8.43 | 8.59 | 8.57 | 8.48 | 0.32 | 0.95 | 0.89 | <0.01 | 0.67 | 0.32 | 0.26 | 0.49 |
| HGB | g/dL | 6.04 | 6.21 | 6.22 | 6.16 | 0.24 | 0.78 | 0.82 | <0.01 | 0.63 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.70 |
| HCT | g/dL | 27.7 | 28.1 | 27.2 | 27.0 | 1.06 | 0.39 | 0.94 | <0.01 | 0.76 | 0.36 | 0.41 | 0.48 |
| MCV | fL | 33.0 | 32.6 | 31.8 | 31.7 | 0.41 | 0.01 | 0.66 | 0.32 | 0.70 | 0.61 | 0.78 | 0.49 |
| MCH | fmol | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.01 | 0.38 | 0.66 | 0.03 | 0.79 | 0.44 | 0.02 | 0.14 |
| MCHC | g/dL | 21.8 | 22.1 | 22.8 | 22.8 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 0.58 | 0.02 | 0.36 | 0.80 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
| RDW | fL | 28.6 | 27.9 | 27.7 | 27.4 | 0.40 | 0.06 | 0.19 | 0.17 | 0.57 | 0.53 | 0.36 | 0.63 |
| RDW | % | 21.4 | 21.1 | 21.5 | 21.4 | 0.31 | 0.43 | 0.49 | 0.08 | 0.81 | 0.53 | 0.19 | 0.30 |
| PLT | 103/dL | 151 | 102 | 115 | 190 | 42.3 | 0.51 | 0.74 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.51 | 0.08 | 0.49 |
| PCT | % | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.61 | 0.68 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.29 | 0.07 | 0.31 |
| MPV | fL | 6.16 | 5.91 | 5.72 | 5.88 | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.76 | 0.07 | 0.17 | 0.40 | 0.21 | 0.95 |
| PDW | fL | 7.91a | 7.20ab | 6.31b | 7.19ab | 0.35 | 0.02 | 0.79 | 0.20 | 0.02 | 0.08 | 0.91 | 0.97 |
| PDW | % | 30.5a | 28.9ab | 27.5b | 29.4ab | 0.71 | 0.06 | 0.85 | 0.18 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.69 | 0.97 |
| PMN phagoc | % | 61.3 | 55.3 | 53.1 | 58.6 | 5.38 | 0.63 | 0.96 | 0.04 | 0.27 | 0.60 | 0.49 | 0.84 |
| Monoc phagoc | % | 19.4 | 14.9 | 13.0 | 18.1 | 3.21 | 0.62 | 0.92 | 0.58 | 0.14 | 0.72 | 0.99 | 0.98 |
| Migration | RFU | 92960 | 80502 | 66035 | 68464 | 8820 | 0.02 | 0.53 | <0.01 | 0.36 | 0.06 | 0.58 | 0.82 |
| Migration/PMN | RFU | 2657 | 2281 | 1572 | 1809 | 304 | <0.01 | 0.80 | <0.01 | 0.27 | <0.01 | 0.34 | 0.34 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).