Submitted:
02 April 2025
Posted:
03 April 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
1.1. What is Exbodiment?
1.2. Erotic Capital
1.3. The Body Image and Schema Test
- (1)
- The Internal Body Model Factor is divided into three dimensions: 1) bio-psycho-drive, as the ability to metabolise and process reality; 2) libidinal-desiring, understood as the ability to express one’s energy; and 3) relational of the original bonds, the relational basis (bonding) that supports the subject’s expression. In this Super Factor, we find the basic structuring of a subject as animated by a vital force (drive), oriented towards a goal (libido), and placed in a relational network (bonds).
- (2)
- The Body Image factor investigates the subjective experience of female and male body image, exploring the presence of a self-perception of the body as totality or partiality.
- (3)
- The Psychomotor factor’s focal points are static and dynamic proprioceptive, the quality of the preferential object, and the relational horizon. It collects the stages of psychomotor development: the postures according to the horizontal and vertical axes of the body in space, the relationship with the object, and the other.
- (4)
- Ego Skin Factor. The skin indicates the boundary between the inside and outside of the body: the threshold. It is proper for the egoic instance to act as an interface between the so-called internal and external worlds, presiding over a controlled exchange with them. The skin has a sensory, protective, filter-exchange function and, again, a thermal self-regulation function. The skin also has a series of “communicative” functions, the surface with which the body makes itself visible to external eyes. The skin is a shell that communicates seductive valences when it is shown. The skin is also an erothema because of the sensory pleasure activated by the stimulation of the skin and the excitement it produces in the other.
- (5)
- The Self-Image factor consists of items referring to the process of structuring the Self: from the introjecting drives of the mouth to the placement of the self within the cycle of life to the symbolic synthesis of the overall Self (the house) representation. The Self-Image factor is completed with symbols of the complex interweaving of self and animals, representing an archaic-totemic potent self symbol.
2. Methods
2.1. Participants
2.2. Procedures
2.3. Measures
2.4. Objectives
- To check the differences in the Capital Erotic Grid between female judges and male judges.
- To verify the conceptual validity of the ECG and BIST instruments.
- To check for any schema and body image structures underlying self-presentation as erotic capital.
2.5. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Hypothesis 1. Gender Differences in the Valuation of Erotic Capital
3.2. Hypothesis 2. ECG – BIST Cross-Validation
3.3. Hypothesis 3. Somato-Psychic Structure and Erotic Capital
4. Discussion
4.1. Hypothesis 1
4.2. Hypothesis 2
4.3. Hypothesis 3
5. Conclusion and Future Perspectives
| 1 | Student”s test: t = -4.405, df = 1129, p <.0005 = 99%, Conf. Int (-0.443, -0.170), in the sample Female Judges M = 2.73, SD = 1.23, compared to Male Judges M = 2.42, SD = 1.11. |
| 2 | Student”s test: t = -3.728, df = 1140, p <.001 = 99%, Conf. Int (-0.334, -0.104), in the sample Female Judges M = 2.43, SD = 1.03, compared to Male Judges M = 2.21, SD = 0.95 |
| 3 | Student”s test: t = 1.971, df = 1126, p < 0.000 = 99%, Conf. Int (0.000, 0.170), in the sample Male Judges M = 3.14, SD = 0.751, compared to Female Judges M = 3.06, SD = 0.70. |
| 4 | Student”s test: t = -7.688, df = 1135, p < 0.001 = 99%, Conf. Int (-0.554, -0.329), in the sample Female Judges M = 2.92, SD = 1.07, compared to Male Judges M = 2.48, SD = 0.85. |
References
- Attwood, F. (2007). Sluts and Riot Grrrls: Female Identity and Sexual Agency. Journal of gender studies, 16(3), 233-247. [CrossRef]
- Bassetti, C. (2013). Da Anna Bolena a Francesca D’Addario. Femminile e femminismo tra vecchi e nuovi moralismi. Studi culturali, ANNO X, N. 3, dicembre 2013, 549-558. [CrossRef]
- Croes, E. A. J., Antheunis, M. L., Schouten, A. P., & Krahmer, E. J. (2019). Social attraction in video-mediated communication: The role of nonverbal affiliative behavior. Journal of social and personal relationships, 36(4), 1210-1232. [CrossRef]
- Csordas, T. J. (2001). Embodiment and experience : the existential ground of culture and self / edited by Thomas J. Csordas. Cambridge: Cambridge : Cambridge University press.
- Eliade, M., Couliano, Ioan Petru (a cura di). (2017). Dizionario dei simboli. Milano: Jaca book.
- Gallagher, S. (2012). The phenomenological mind (2nd ed.. ed.). London ; New York: London ; New York : Routledge.
- Gangestad, S. W., & Scheyd, G. J. (2005). The Evolution of Human Physical Attractiveness. Annual review of anthropology, 34(1), 523-548. [CrossRef]
- Goffman, E. (2009). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. The Times higher education supplement(1893), 40.
- Hakim, C. (2010a). Erotic Capital. European sociological review, 26(5), 499-518. [CrossRef]
- Hakim, C. (2010b). Erotic capital... and why it is being underestimated. Internationale Politik (Bonn, Germany : 1995), 65(3), 110-119.
- Hakim, C. (2011). Honey money : the power of erotic capital / Catherine Hakim. London: Allen Lane.
- Hatton, E., & Trautner, M. N. (2011). Equal Opportunity Objectification? The Sexualization of Men and Women on the Cover of Rolling Stone. Sexuality & culture, 15(3), 256-278. [CrossRef]
- Hochschild, A. R. (2012). The managed heart : commercialization of human feeling / Arlie Russell Hochschild ; update with a new preface. Berkeley [etc: University of California.
- Jackson, C. A., & Luchner, A. F. (2018). Self-presentation mediates the relationship between Self-criticism and emotional response to Instagram feedback. Personality and Individual Differences, 133, 1-6. [CrossRef]
- Jenkins, R. (1992). Pierre Bourdieu (1 ed.). Oxford: Routledge.
- Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2000). Choices, values, and frames / edited by Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
- Lemma, A. (2010). Under the skin : a psychoanalytic study of body modification. Hove, East Sussex ;: Routledge.
- Lewin, K. (1939). Field Theory and Experiment in Social Psychology: Concepts and Methods. The American journal of sociology, 44(6), 868-896. [CrossRef]
- Lindblom, J. (2015). Embodied social cognition / Jessica Lindblom. Chan: Chan : Springer.
- Lionel, B., Benoit, R., Guillaume, T. V., & Nicolas, V. (2016). Dynamics of Sensorimotor Interactions in Embodied Cognition: Frontiers Media SA.
- Manago, A. M., Graham, M. B., Greenfield, P. M., & Salimkhan, G. (2008). Self-presentation and gender on MySpace. Journal of applied developmental psychology, 29(6), 446-458. [CrossRef]
- Marienberg, S. (2017). Symbolic articulation: image, word, and body between action and schema. Berlin: De Gruyter.
- Montemurro, B., & Hughes, E. (2024). Erotic capital and erotic dividends. Sexualities. [CrossRef]
- Otten, M., Seth, A. K., & Pinto, Y. (2017). A social Bayesian brain: How social knowledge can shape visual perception. Brain and Cognition, 112, 69-77. [CrossRef]
- Purves, D., Wojtach, W. T., & Lotto, R. B. (2011). Understanding vision in wholly empirical terms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 108(Supplement 3), 15588-15595. [CrossRef]
- Reed, R. (1951). Field Theory in Social Science. In (Vol. 12, pp. 103-104): American Catholic Sociological Society.
- Reenkola, E. (2021). Envy between women. The Scandinavian psychoanalytic review, 44(1-2), 59-66. [CrossRef]
- Segal, H. (2018). Klein (First edition. ed.). London: Routledge.
- Seidman, G. (2013). Self-presentation and belonging on Facebook: How personality influences social media use and motivations. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(3), 402-407. [CrossRef]
- Smith, D., Elias, N., & Foucault, M. (1999). “The Civilizing Process” and “The History of Sexuality”: Comparing Norbert Elias and Michel Foucault. Theory and society, 28(1), 79-100. [CrossRef]
- Sprecher, S., & Hatfield, E. (2022). Ratings of the physical attractiveness of an interaction partner after a g etting-acquainted interaction. Personal relationships, 29(2), 366-385. [CrossRef]
- Stewart, J., Gapenne, O., Paolo, E. A. D., Rohde, M., Jaegher, H. D., Barbaras, R., . . . Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2010). Enaction: Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science (1 ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Tajfel, H. (1969). Cognitive Aspects of Prejudice. Journal of social issues, 25(4), 79-97. [CrossRef]
- Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European journal of social psychology, 1(2), 149-178. [CrossRef]
- Tiemersma , D. (1989). Body schema and body image: an interdisciplinary and philosophical study / Douwe Tiemersma. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
- Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First Impressions: Making up Your Mind after a 100-Ms Exposure to a Face. Psychological Science, 17(7), 592-598. [CrossRef]
- Youyou, W., Kosinski, M., & Stillwell, D. (2015). Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 112(4), 1036-1040. [CrossRef]
- Zahavi, D. (2000). Exploring the Self: Philosophical and psychopathological perspectives on self-experience (1 ed.). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- Zaidel, D. W., & Cohen, J. A. (2005). THE FACE, BEAUTY, AND SYMMETRY: PERCEIVING ASYMMETRY IN BEAUTIFUL FACES. International journal of neuroscience, 115(8), 1165-1173. [CrossRef]
- Ziemke, T., Zlatev, J., & Frank, R. M. (2007). Phenomenological and experimental contributions to understanding embodied experience. In (Vol. 35.1). Germany: De Gruyter, Inc.



| N. | % | |
|---|---|---|
| 20 - 32 years old | 114 | 79,7 |
| 33 - 49 years old | 17 | 11,9 |
| 50 - 99 years old | 4 | 2,8 |
| Sub Total | 135 | 94,4 |
| Missing | 8 | 5,6 |
| Total | 143 | 100,0 |
| SEDUCTION AXIS = SEX APPEAL & CHARME | SEX APPEAL = Naked Skin & Skin Erothema & Lip Expressive | COMMUNICATION & CHARM = Eye Contact & Posing | Naked SKIN | Skin erothema | Posing | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ego Skin Factor | Pearson Corr. | ,244** | ,223** | 0,16 | ,232** | ,190* | ,167* |
| P. (two-tailed) | 0,00 | 0,01 | 0,05 | 0,01 | 0,02 | 0,05 | |
| N | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 | |
| Item Ego Sensitivity. | Pearson Corr. | 0,13 | ,166* | 0,02 | ,224** | 0,16 | 0,02 |
| P. (two-tailed) | 0,12 | 0,05 | 0,82 | 0,01 | 0,06 | 0,85 | |
| N | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 | |
| Item Self Presentation. | Pearson Corr. | ,222** | ,169* | ,198* | 0,10 | 0,15 | ,218** |
| P. (two-tailed) | 0,01 | 0,04 | 0,02 | 0,25 | 0,07 | 0,01 | |
| N | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 |
| Accessories | SEDUCTION AXIS = SEX APPEAL & CHARME | SEX APPEAL = Naked Skin & Skin Erothema & Lip Expressive | Skin erothema | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIBIDINAL SUBFACTOR | Pearson Corr. | -0,13 | -0,15 | -0,14 | -,167* |
| P. (two-tailed) | 0,13 | 0,08 | 0,09 | 0,05 | |
| N | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 | |
| Item Female Sex Imago. | Pearson Corr. | -,185* | -0,04 | -0,01 | -0,03 |
| P. (two-tailed) | 0,03 | 0,68 | 0,86 | 0,73 | |
| N | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 | |
| Item Male Sex Imago. | Pearson Corr. | ,169* | 0,05 | 0,01 | 0,03 |
| P. (two-tailed) | 0,04 | 0,54 | 0,90 | 0,71 | |
| N | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 | |
| Item Self Aspiration. | Pearson Corr. | -0,16 | -,217** | -,196* | -,234** |
| P. (two-tailed) | 0,05 | 0,01 | 0,02 | 0,00 | |
| N | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 |
| STYLE AXIS = EMBELLISHMENT & FASHION | EMBELLISHMENT = Makeup & Hairstyle | FASHION = Total look & Accessories | Makeup | Hairstyle | Total look | Accessories | Skin erothema | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self Image Factor | Pearson Corr. | 0,06 | -0,04 | 0,16 | -0,04 | -0,02 | 0,05 | ,177* | 0,01 |
| P. (two-tailed) | 0,51 | 0,68 | 0,06 | 0,65 | 0,80 | 0,55 | 0,03 | 0,89 | |
| N | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 | |
| Item Life Cycle Phase. | Pearson Corr. | -,251** | -,236** | -,191* | -,202* | -,231** | -,171* | -0,14 | -0,01 |
| P. (two-tailed) | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,02 | 0,02 | 0,01 | 0,04 | 0,08 | 0,92 | |
| N | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 | |
| Item Self-Expression. | Pearson Corr. | 0,13 | 0,05 | ,195* | 0,03 | 0,07 | 0,11 | ,182* | 0,02 |
| P. (two-tailed) | 0,13 | 0,58 | 0,02 | 0,76 | 0,41 | 0,18 | 0,03 | 0,81 | |
| N | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 | 143,00 |
| SEX APPEAL = Naked Skin & Skin Erothema & Lip Expressive | Skin erothema | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PSYCHOMOTOR FACTOR | Pearson Corr. | -,174* | -,179* |
| P. (two-tailed) | 0,04 | 0,03 | |
| N | 143,00 | 143,00 | |
| Item Form Dyad to Group. | Pearson Corr. | -,181* | -,169* |
| P. (two-tailed) | 0,03 | 0,04 | |
| N | 143,00 | 143,00 |
| Cluster Final Centre | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Provocative Individualists with a Modest Self Image | High overall erotic capital and youthful self-esteem | Low overall erotic capital and ambivalent and ambitious self-image | Erotic Capital: Strong-willed and group soap and water | |
| Embellishment | -0,876 | 0,820 | -0,593 | 0,057 |
| Fashion | -0,626 | 0,711 | -0,588 | 0,019 |
| Sex appeal | 1,160 | 0,613 | -0,613 | -0,640 |
| Communication & Charme | 0,012 | 0,767 | -0,678 | -0,246 |
| Libid Factor | 0,049 | -0,130 | 0,425 | -0,257 |
| Psychomotor Factor | -0,508 | 0,192 | 0,103 | 0,188 |
| Ego Skin Factor | 0,592 | 0,631 | 0,715 | -0,421 |
| Self Image Factor | -0,507 | 0,106 | 0,638 | -0,485 |
| Number of cases in each cluster | ||||
| Cluster | 1 | 18,000 | ||
| 2 | 43,000 | |||
| 3 | 37,000 | |||
| 4 | 36,000 | |||
| Valid | 134,000 | |||
| Missing | 9,000 | |||
| Final Cluster Centre | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low overall erotic capital and ambivalent and ambitious self-image | Provocative individualists with a modest self-image | High overall erotic capital and youthful self-esteem | Erotic capital water and soap strong-willed and group them | |
| Embellishment | -0,467 | -0,963 | 0,898 | 0,402 |
| Fashion | -0,282 | -0,600 | 1,026 | -0,179 |
| Sex appeal | -0,581 | 0,776 | 0,855 | -0,386 |
| Communication & Charme | -0,609 | -0,119 | 0,728 | 0,274 |
| Female Sex Imago | 0,095 | 0,148 | -0,218 | 0,200 |
| Male Sex Imago | 0,007 | 0,188 | 0,295 | -0,171 |
| Self Aspiration | 0,222 | -0,372 | -0,607 | -0,189 |
| Social Development | 0,203 | -0,840 | -0,141 | 0,809 |
| Ego Sensitivity | 0,205 | 0,499 | 0,329 | 0,466 |
| Intentional Self | -0,597 | 0,697 | 0,157 | 0,938 |
| Life Cicle Phase | 0,120 | 0,686 | -0,421 | -0,032 |
| Self Expression | 0,347 | -0,544 | 0,311 | -0,211 |
| Numbers | ||||
| Cluster | 1 | 52,000 | ||
| 2 | 21,000 | |||
| 3 | 33,000 | |||
| 4 | 37,000 | |||
| Missing | 143,000 | |||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
