Submitted:
29 March 2025
Posted:
31 March 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design and Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria
2.2. Sample Size Calculation
2.3. Methodology of Ultrasound Assessment of the Endometrium
2.4. Methods of Endometrial Biopsy Sampling and Their Histological Examination
2.4.1. Glandular Epithelium
2.4.2. Pinopods
2.4.3. Reticulin Fibers of the Extracellular Matrix
2.4.4. Collagen Fibers of the Extracellular Matrix
2.4.5. Interpretation of the Histochemical Pattern of the Extracellular Matrix of the Endometrium by the Reticulin-Collagen Phenotype
2.5. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of the Study Groups
3.2. Characterization of Histochemical Patterns of Reticulin and Collagen in the Endometrial Extracellular Matrix


3.3. Comparative Analysis of Histochemical Patterns of the Endometrial Extracellular Matrix and Ultrasonography Endometrial Pattern
3.4. Comparative Analysis of Histochemical Patterns of Extracellular Matrix and Histological Features of Glandular Epithelium of the Endometrium
3.5. Comparative Analysis of Histochemical Patterns of Extracellular Matrix and the Number of Pinopodia in the Endometrial Epithelium in the Middle of the Secretory Phase
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Muter J, Lynch VJ, McCoy RC, Brosens JJ. Human embryo implantation. Development. 2023;150(10):dev201507. [CrossRef]
- Bazer FW, Spencer TE, Johnson GA, Burghardt RC, Wu G. Comparative aspects of implantation. Reproduction. 2009;138(2):195-209. [CrossRef]
- Benagiano G, Mancuso S, Guo SW, Di Renzo GC. Events Leading to the Establishment of Pregnancy and Placental Formation: The Need to Fine-Tune the Nomenclature on Pregnancy and Gestation. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(20):15420. Published 2023 Oct 21. [CrossRef]
- O’Connor BB, Pope BD, Peters MM, Ris-Stalpers C, Parker KK. The role of extracellular matrix in normal and pathological pregnancy: Future applications of microphysiological systems in reproductive medicine. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2020; 245(13):1163-1174. [CrossRef]
- Pelham RJ Jr, Wang Yl. Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94(25):13661-13665. [CrossRef]
- Xu P, Wang Y, Piao Y, et al. Effects of matrix proteins on the expression of matrix metalloproteinase-2, -9, and -14 and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases in human cytotrophoblast cells during the first trimester. Biol Reprod. 2001;65(1):240-246. [CrossRef]
- Liu R, Dai M, Gong G. et al. The role of extracellular matrix on unfavorable maternal–fetal interface: focusing on the function of collagen in human fertility. J Leather Sci Eng 4. 2022(13. [CrossRef]
- Aplin JD, Charlton AK, Ayad S. An immunohistochemical study of human endometrial extracellular matrix during the menstrual cycle and first trimester of pregnancy. Cell Tissue Res. 1988;253(1):231-240. [CrossRef]
- Kisling A, Lust RM, Katwa LC. What is the role of peptide fragments of collagen I and IV in health and disease?. Life Sci. 2019;228:30-34. [CrossRef]
- Kisalus LL, Herr JC, Little CD. Immunolocalization of extracellular matrix proteins and collagen synthesis in first-trimester human decidua. Anat Rec. 1987;218(4):402-415. [CrossRef]
- Tang VW. Collagen, stiffness, and adhesion: the evolutionary basis of vertebrate mechanobiology. Mol Biol Cell. 2020;31(17):1823-1834. [CrossRef]
- Schlunck G, Han H, Wecker T, Kampik D, Meyer-ter-Vehn T, Grehn F. Substrate rigidity modulates cell matrix interactions and protein expression in human trabecular meshwork cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(1):262-269. [CrossRef]
- Sternberg AK, Buck VU, Classen-Linke I, Leube RE. How Mechanical Forces Change the Human Endometrium during the Menstrual Cycle in Preparation for Embryo Implantation. Cells. 2021;10(8):2008. Published 2021 Aug 6. [CrossRef]
- Abbas Y, Carnicer-Lombarte A, Gardner L, et al. Tissue stiffness at the human maternal-fetal interface. Hum Reprod. 2019;34(10):1999-2008. [CrossRef]
- Okada H, Tsuzuki T, Murata H. Decidualization of the human endometrium. Reprod Med Biol. 2018;17(3):220-227. Published 2018 Feb 1. [CrossRef]
- Ma Z, Sagrillo-Fagundes L, Mok S, Vaillancourt C, Moraes C. Mechanobiological regulation of placental trophoblast fusion and function through extracellular matrix rigidity. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):5837. Published 2020 Apr 3. [CrossRef]
- Iwahashi M, Muragaki Y, Ooshima A, Nakano R. Decreased type IV collagen expression by human decidual tissues in spontaneous abortion. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81:2925–9. [CrossRef]
- Fu Q, Sun Y, Tao Y, et al. Involvement of the JAK-STAT pathway in collagen regulation of decidual NK cells. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2017;78(6):10.1111/aji.12769. [CrossRef]
- Yoshii N, Hamatani T, Inagaki N, et al. Successful implantation after reducing matrix metalloproteinase activity in the uterine cavity. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2013;11:37. [CrossRef]
- Fu Q, Tao Y, Piao H, Du MR, Li DJ. Trophoblasts and decidual stromal cells regulate decidual NK cell functions via interaction between collagen and LAIR-1. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2014;71:368–78. [CrossRef]
- Lucas ES, Dyer NP, Murakami K, et al. Loss of Endometrial Plasticity in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss. Stem Cells. 2016;34(2):346-356. [CrossRef]
- Salker M, Teklenburg G, Molokhia M, et al. Natural selection of human embryos: impaired decidualization of endometrium disables embryo-maternal interactions and causes recurrent pregnancy loss. PLoS One. 2010;5(4):e10287. [CrossRef]
- Salker MS, Nautiyal J, Steel JH, et al. Disordered IL-33/ST2 activation in decidualizing stromal cells prolongs uterine receptivity in women with recurrent pregnancy loss. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52252. [CrossRef]
- Potiris A, Alyfanti E, Drakaki E, et al. The Contribution of Proteomics in Understanding Endometrial Protein Expression in Women with Recurrent Implantation Failure. J Clin Med. 2024;13(7):2145. [CrossRef]
- Ticconi C, Pietropolli A, Di Simone N, Piccione E, Fazleabas A. Endometrial Immune Dysfunction in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(21):5332. [CrossRef]
- You S, Zhu Y, Li H, et al. Recombinant humanized collagen remodels endometrial immune microenvironment of chronic endometritis through macrophage immunomodulation. Regen Biomater. 2023;10:rbad033. Published 2023 Apr 3. [CrossRef]
- Watt FM, Huck WT. Role of the extracellular matrix in regulating stem cell fate. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013;14(8):467-473. [CrossRef]
- Wei Y, Deng Z, Yin T. Are we closer to robust predictors of recurrent pregnancy loss by means of integrating different types of omics data?. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2024;24(7):561-563. [CrossRef]
- Messaoudi S, El Kasmi I, Bourdiec A, et al. 15 years of transcriptomic analysis on endometrial receptivity: what have we learnt?. Fertil Res Pract. 2019;5:9. [CrossRef]
- Fu X, Guo X, Xu H, et al. Varied cellular abnormalities in thin vs. normal endometrium in recurrent implantation failure by single-cell transcriptomics Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024 Aug 27;22(1):109. [CrossRef]
- Davalieva K, Kocarev D, Plaseska-Karanfilska D. Decoding recurrent pregnancy loss: insights from comparative proteomics studies. Biol Reprod. Published online September 17, 2024. [CrossRef]
- Latifi Z, Fattahi A, Ranjbaran A, Nejabati HR, Imakawa K. Potential roles of metalloproteinases of endometrium-derived exosomes in embryo-maternal crosstalk during implantation. J Cell Physiol. 2018;233(6):4530-4545. [CrossRef]
- Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, Dyer S, Racowsky C, de Mouzon J, Sokol R, Rienzi L, Sunde A, Schmidt L, Cooke ID, Simpson JL, van der Poel S. The International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care, 2017. Hum Reprod. 2017 Sep 1;32:1786-1801. [CrossRef]
- Li L, Gao DD, Zhang Y, Song JY, Sun ZG. Comparison of Stimulated Cycles with Low Dose r-FSH versus Hormone Replacement Cycles for Endometrial Preparation Prior to Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer in Young Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study from China. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2021;15:2805-2813. [CrossRef]
- Shein-Chung Chow, Hansheng Wang, Jun Shao. Sample Size Calculations in Clinical Research. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2003.
- Kang H. Sample size determination and power analysis using the G*Power software. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2021;18:17. [CrossRef]
- Gonen Y, Casper RF, Jacobson W, Blankier J. Endometrial thickness and growth during ovarian stimulation: a possible predictor of implantation in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1989;52(3):446-450. [CrossRef]
- Zhao J, Zhang Q, Li Y. The effect of endometrial thickness and pattern measured by ultrasonography on pregnancy outcomes during IVF-ET cycles. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2012;10:100. [CrossRef]
- Ma NZ, Chen L, Dai W, Bu ZQ, Hu LL, Sun YP. Influence of endometrial thickness on treatment outcomes following in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2017;15(1):5. [CrossRef]
- McWilliams GD, Frattarelli JL. Changes in measured endometrial thickness predict in vitro fertilization success. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(1):74-81. [CrossRef]
- Zhao J, Zhang Q, Wang YG, Li YP. Endometrial pattern, thickness and growth in predicting pregnancy outcome following 3319 ivf cycle. Reprod BioMed Online. 2014;29:291-298. [CrossRef]
- Zhang CH, Chen C, Wang JR, et al. An endometrial receptivity scoring system basing on the endometrial thickness, volume, echo, peristalsis, and blood flow evaluated by ultrasonography. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;13:907874. [CrossRef]
- Forrest TS, Elyaderani MK, Muilenburg MI, Bewtra C, Kable WT, Sullivan P. Cyclic endometrial changes: US assessment with histologic correlation. Radiology. 1988;167(1):233-237. [CrossRef]
- Li TC, Nuttall L, Klentzeris L, Cooke ID. How well does ultrasonographic measurement of endometrial thickness predict the results of histological dating?. Hum Reprod. 1992;7(1):1-5. [CrossRef]
- Singh N, Bahadur A, Mittal S, Malhotra N, Bhatt A. Predictive value of endometrial thickness, pattern and sub-endometrial blood flows on the day of hCG by 2D doppler in in-vitro fertilization cycles: A prospective clinical study from a tertiary care unit. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2011;4(1):29-33. [CrossRef]
- Taizhanova, D.Z., Zubkov, D.V., Komlichenko, E.V., Magalov, I.S., Sorokina, M.A., Bespalova, N.V., Maidanova, Z.O., The possibilities of adverse pregnancy outcomes predicting based on laboratory markers of reproductive losses. Medicine and ecology. 202;.77–84. [CrossRef]
- Johannisson E, Parker RA, Landgren BM, Diczfalusy E. Morphometric analysis of the human endometrium in relation to peripheral hormone levels. Fertil Steril. 1982;38(5):564-571. [CrossRef]
- Masson’s Trichrome Staining Protocol for Collagen Fibers. Available online: https://ihcworld.com/2024/01/26/massons-trichrome-staining-protocol-for-collagen-fibers/ (accessed 25.03.2025).
- Reticulum Stain Kit (Modified Gomori’s) For the Histological Visualization of Reticular Fibers. Version 1 Last updated 27 June 2018 ab236473 Available online: https://www.abcam.com/ps/products/236/ab236473/documents/ab236473%20-%20Reticulum%20Stain%20Kit%20(Modified%20Gomori’s)%20v1a%20(website).pdf?srsltid=AfmBOoq1ulkwp1N_1Z2pdyiRwQhqo2CC3FiyCB_n4ad8LHG3DYi7u1GD (accessed 25.03.2025).
- Noyes RW, Hertig AT, Rock J. Dating the endometrial biopsy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975;122(2):262-263. [CrossRef]
- Hendrickson MR, Kempson RL. Decision tree for endometrial dating. In: Benningtoon JL, ed. Surgical pathology of the uterine corpus. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1980:80 -5.
- Murray MJ, Meyer WR, Zaino RJ, et al. A critical analysis of the accuracy, reproducibility, and clinical utility of histologic endometrial dating in fertile women. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(5):1333-1343. [CrossRef]
- Dallenbach-Hellweg G. The endometrium of infertility. A review. Pathol Res Pract. 1984;178(6):527-537. [CrossRef]
- Acosta AA, Elberger L, Borghi M, et al. Endometrial dating and determination of the window of implantation in healthy fertile women. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(4):788-798. [CrossRef]
- Jin XY, Zhao LJ, Luo DH, et al. Pinopode score around the time of implantation is predictive of successful implantation following frozen embryo transfer in hormone replacement cycles. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(12):2394-2403. [CrossRef]
- Develioglu OH, Nikas G, Hsiu JG, Toner JP, Jones HW Jr. Detection of endometrial pinopodes by light microscopy. Fertil Steril. 2000;74(4):767-770. [CrossRef]
- Nikas G, Makrigiannakis A, Hovatta O, Jones HW Jr. Surface morphology of the human endometrium. Basic and clinical aspects. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;900:316-324. [CrossRef]
- Boland K, Nguyen GC. Microscopic Colitis: A Review of Collagenous and Lymphocytic Colitis. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2017;13(11):671-677.
- Lazenby AJ, Yardley JH, Giardiello FM, Jessurun J, Bayless TM. Lymphocytic (“microscopic”) colitis: a comparative histopathologic study with particular reference to collagenous colitis. Hum Pathol. 1989;20(1):18-28. [CrossRef]
- Yuan L, Wu TT, Zhang L. Microscopic colitis: lymphocytic colitis, collagenous colitis, and beyond. Hum Pathol. 2023;132:89-101. [CrossRef]
- Iwahashi M, Nakano R. Decreased type V collagen expression in human decidual tissues of spontaneous abortion during early pregnancy. J Clin Pathol. 1998;51(1):44-46. [CrossRef]
- Foy M, Anézo O, Saule S, Planque N. PRL-3/PTP4A3 phosphatase regulates integrin β1 in adhesion structures during migration of human ocular melanoma cells. Exp Cell Res. 2017;353(2):88-99. [CrossRef]
- Shi JW, Lai ZZ, Yang HL, et al. Collagen at the maternal-fetal interface in human pregnancy. Int J Biol Sci. 2020;16(12):2220-2234. [CrossRef]
- Rygiel TP, Stolte EH, de Ruiter T, van de Weijer ML, Meyaard L. Tumor-expressed collagens can modulate immune cell function through the inhibitory collagen receptor LAIR-1. Mol Immunol. 2011;49(1-2):402-406. [CrossRef]
- Lv S, Lu C, Li M, et al. The dynamic changes in myocardial collagen metabolism in experimental autoimmune myocarditis rats. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2018;59(4):234-237. [CrossRef]
- Li M, Yao L, Xin M, Gao M. Dysregulation of collagen expression in peri-implantation endometrium of women with high ovarian response. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019;45(5):1035-1044. [CrossRef]
- Kaufmann P, Stark J, Stegner HE. The villous stroma of the human placenta. I. The ultrastructure of fixed connective tissue cells. Cell Tissue Res. 1977;177(1):105-121. [CrossRef]
- Okada Y, Asahina T, Kobayashi T, Goto J, Terao T. Studies on the mechanism of edematous changes at the endometrial stroma for implantation. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2001;27(2):67-77. [CrossRef]
- Saadat P, Boostanfar R, Slater CC, Tourgeman DE, Stanczyk FZ, Paulson RJ. Accelerated endometrial maturation in the luteal phase of cycles utilizing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: impact of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists versus antagonists. Fertil Steril. 2004;82(1):167-171. [CrossRef]
- Corbacioglu A, Baysal B. Effects of steroid hormone levels on the ultrasound appearance of the preovulatory endometrium in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles. Int J Fertil Steril. 2012;5(4):203-206.
- Nissinen L, Kähäri VM. Matrix metalloproteinases in inflammation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1840(8):2571-2580. [CrossRef]
- Lee HS, Kim WJ. The Role of Matrix Metalloproteinase in Inflammation with a Focus on Infectious Diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(18):10546. Published 2022 Sep 11. [CrossRef]
- Chen K, Xu M, Lu F, He Y. Development of Matrix Metalloproteinases-Mediated Extracellular Matrix Remodeling in Regenerative Medicine: A Mini Review. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2023;20(5):661-670. [CrossRef]
- Pezaro S, Pearce G, Reinhold E. Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome during pregnancy, birth and beyond. Br J Midwifery 2018;26:217-23. [CrossRef]
- Ganer Herman H, Volodarsky-Perel A, Ton Nu TN, et al. Pregnancy complications and placental histology following embryo transfer with a thinner endometrium. Hum Reprod. 2022;37(8):1739-1745. [CrossRef]
| Patient characteristics | Groups (N-100) | p-value | |
|
Physiological reproductive pattern (n-50) |
Recurrent reproductive failures (n-50) |
||
| Age, mean ± SD | 31.14 ± 4.66 | 32.08 ± 4.37 | 0.236 |
| Body Mass Index (BMI), (kg/m2) | 24.4 (95% СI:23.5-25.3) | 24.9 (95% СI:24.0-25.7) | 0.389 |
| Pregnancies: number and outcomes | |||
| Gravida, median (IQR) | 2 (1) | 3 (1) | 0.002 |
| Clinical pregnancy loss, median (IQR) | 0 (0) | 2 (1) | - |
| Biochemical pregnancy loss, median (IQR) | 0 (0) | 1 (2) | - |
| Number of live births, median (IQR) | 2 (1) | 0 (0) | - |
| Preterm birth, median (IQR) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | - |
| Term delivery, median (IQR) | 2 (1) | 0 (0) | - |
| Hormons | |||
| TSH (uU/mL) | 2.41 ± 0.86 | 2.62 ± 0.92 | 0.211 |
| Basal FSH (IU/L) | 7.81 (95% СI:7.2-8.4) | 7.49 (95% СI:6.6-8.3) | 0.934 |
| Basal LH (IU/L) | 4.92 ± 2.24 | 4.86 ± 1.42 | 0.667 |
| Basal serum estradiol (E2) (pg/mL) | 39.03 ± 17.48 | 42.40 ± 21.82 | 0.627 |
| Correspondence to the ovarian cycle | Physiological reproductive status | Recurrent reproductive failures | ||
| Yes | No | Yes | No | |
| Normal reticulin-collagen pattern (NP) |
46(92%) | 4(8%) | 22(44%) | 28(56%)* |
| Natural cycles, n (%) | 46(100%) | 4(100%) | 7(28.6%) | 9(32.1%) |
| Stimulated cycles, n (%) | - | - | 15(71.4%) | 19(67.9%) |
| Pathological stromal reticulin pattern without collagenosis (aNP) |
4(8%) | 46(92%) | 21(42%)* | 29(58%) |
| Natural cycles, n (%) | 4(100%) | 46(100%) | 6(28.6%) | 10(34.5%) |
| Stimulated cycles, n (%) | - | - | 15(71.4%) | 19(65.5%) |
| Pathological stromal reticulin pattern with collagenosis (aNPС) |
0(0%) | 50(100%) | 7(14%)* | 43(86%) |
| Natural cycles, n (%) | - | 50(100%) | 3(42.9%) | 13(30.2%) |
| Stimulated cycles, n (%) | - | - | 4(57.1%) | 30(69.8%) |
| US-pattern correspondence to the cycle | Physiological reproductive status | Recurrent reproductive failures | ||
| Yes | No | Yes | No | |
| Common numbers, n (%) | 40(80%) | 10(20%) | 35(70%) | 15(30%) |
| Natural cycles, n (%) | 40(100%) | 10(100%) | 10(28.6%) | 6(40.0%) |
| Stimulated cycles, n (%) | - | - | 25(71.4%)* | 9(60.0%) |
|
Corresppondence to the cycle |
Physiological reproductive status | Recurrent reproductive failures | ||
| Yes | No | Yes | No | |
| Common numbers, n (%) | 43(86%) | 7(14%) | 38(76%) | 12(24%) |
| Natural cycles, n (%) | 43(100%) | 7(100%) | 11(28.9%) | 5(41.7%) |
| Stimulated cycles, n (%) | - | - | 27(71.1%)* | 7(58.3%) |
| Relative number of pinopodes | Physiological reproductive status | Recurrent reproductive failures | ||
| >50% | <50% | >50% | <50% | |
| Common numbers, n (%) | 34 (68%) | 16(32%) | 26(52%) | 24(48%) |
| Natural cycles, n (%) | 34 (100%) | 16(100%) | 9(34.6%) | 7(29.2%) |
| Stimulated cycles, n (%) | - | - | 17(65.4%) | 17(70.8%) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).