Sort by
Analysis of Selected Factors Associated with Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Stress Urinary Incontinence—A Cross‐Sectional Study
Grażyna Jarząbek-Bielecka
,Jakub Mroczyk
,Agata Puszcz
,Sara Kalisoras
,Karolina Cieciura
,Piotr Merks
,Katarzyna Plagens-Rotman
,Witold Mirosław Kędzia
,Magdalena Pisarska-Krawczyk
,Barbara Więckowska
+3 authors
Posted: 30 July 2026
Long-Term Follow-Up After Surgical Treatment of Anogenital and Oropharyngeal Condyloma Acuminata with Simultaneous HPV Vaccination Initiation in Patients with Concurrent HPV-16 or -18 Co-Infection
Joanna Wojciula
,Marcin Bartoszewicz
,Magdalena Wojciula
,Piotr Sienkiewicz
,Grzegorz Szewczyk
,Piotr Fiedor
Posted: 29 July 2026
Standardized and AI-Assisted Ultrasound Triage for Ovarian Cancer Diagnosis: IOTA, O-RADS and Clinical Governance
Igor Garcia-Atutxa
Posted: 28 July 2026
Prenatal Ultrasound Screening for Corpus Callosum Anomalies: A Narrative Review
Kwok-Yin Leung
Posted: 22 July 2026
Vaginal Delivery of Concentrated Oxygen and Hyaluronic Acid Improves the Implantation Rate in Human IVF: A Proof of Concept Study
Brian Dale
,Rocco Falotico
,Daniela Dale
,Maristella D’Uva
,Arianna Ramone
,Chiara Riccio
,Flavio Garoia
Posted: 20 July 2026
Clinical Results in Laparoscopic Apical Prolapse Repair: A Prospective Comparative Cohort of Sacrocolpopexy, Lateral Suspension and Pectopexy with 312 Women
María Luisa Sánchez-Ferrer
,Isabel Ñíguez-Sevilla
,Juan Antonio Ruiz-Morales
Background/Objectives: Sacrocolpopexy (SP) remains the gold standard for apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair; however, promontory-sparing techniques such as laparoscopic lateral suspension (LLS) and pectopexy (PP) have emerged as alternatives to reduce surgical complexity and potential complications. Comparative evidence among these techniques remains limited. Methods: Single-center prospective cohort study including 312 women undergoing laparoscopic apical POP repair. The primary endpoint was apical recurrence, defined as POP-Q stage ≥ II, point C > 0, or reintervention. Secondary endpoints included compartment-specific recurrence, operative time, and perioperative complications. Anatomical outcomes were assessed using both POP-Q staging and individual POP-Q measurements. Results: Anatomical preoperative heterogeneity reflecting routine clinical practice due to the non-randomized design. No significant differences were observed in apical recurrence rates (p=0.779), point C > 0 (p=0.696) or reintervention rates (p=0.719) between techniques. Anterior compartment outcomes were comparable, although Ba > 0 was more frequent in PP (p=0.005). Posterior compartment recurrence differed, with higher rates in PP compared to SP (p=0.007). Operative time was significantly longer in SP (202.5 ± 61.2 min) than in LLS (113.0 ± 40.3 min) and PP (168.0 ± 48.8 min) (p<0.001). Overall complication rates were similar (p=0.152), although major complications occurred in SP. Conclusions: SP remains the gold standard laparoscopic technique for apical prolapse but entails greater surgical complexity and increased operative time, whereas LLS and PP could be other options to correct the apical defect. Future multicenter randomized trials with long-term follow-up are required to determine definitive equivalence among techniques. Surgical planning should be individualized based on patient risk profile and anatomical considerations.
Background/Objectives: Sacrocolpopexy (SP) remains the gold standard for apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair; however, promontory-sparing techniques such as laparoscopic lateral suspension (LLS) and pectopexy (PP) have emerged as alternatives to reduce surgical complexity and potential complications. Comparative evidence among these techniques remains limited. Methods: Single-center prospective cohort study including 312 women undergoing laparoscopic apical POP repair. The primary endpoint was apical recurrence, defined as POP-Q stage ≥ II, point C > 0, or reintervention. Secondary endpoints included compartment-specific recurrence, operative time, and perioperative complications. Anatomical outcomes were assessed using both POP-Q staging and individual POP-Q measurements. Results: Anatomical preoperative heterogeneity reflecting routine clinical practice due to the non-randomized design. No significant differences were observed in apical recurrence rates (p=0.779), point C > 0 (p=0.696) or reintervention rates (p=0.719) between techniques. Anterior compartment outcomes were comparable, although Ba > 0 was more frequent in PP (p=0.005). Posterior compartment recurrence differed, with higher rates in PP compared to SP (p=0.007). Operative time was significantly longer in SP (202.5 ± 61.2 min) than in LLS (113.0 ± 40.3 min) and PP (168.0 ± 48.8 min) (p<0.001). Overall complication rates were similar (p=0.152), although major complications occurred in SP. Conclusions: SP remains the gold standard laparoscopic technique for apical prolapse but entails greater surgical complexity and increased operative time, whereas LLS and PP could be other options to correct the apical defect. Future multicenter randomized trials with long-term follow-up are required to determine definitive equivalence among techniques. Surgical planning should be individualized based on patient risk profile and anatomical considerations.
Posted: 20 July 2026
Recurrent Implantation Failure and the Gut-Endometrium Axis: A Pilot Study on Microbiota Crosstalk
Flora Caruso
,Luigi Vigilante
,Danilo Borrelli
,Alessandra Gallo
,Ida Strina
,Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo
,Maria Rosaria Fantuz
,Giovanni Savarese
Posted: 20 July 2026
Clinical and Sociodemographic Profile of Patients Accessing Assisted Reproductive Techniques in a Public Unit: Equity in Access and the Exploratory Role of Uterine Factor
Lucía Inmaculada Martín Román
,Ana Cerezo Mondragón
,Ana Gallardo Carvajal
,Isaac Cohen Cordia
,Marta Blasco Alonso
,Jesus S. Jimenez Lopez
Posted: 08 July 2026
Negative Pregnancy Experiences and Psychological Distress: Protective Roles of Active Coping and Marital Satisfaction
Elena Otilia Vladislav
,Corina Ioana Paica-Stoian
,Diana Antonia Iordăchescu
,Anca Maria Panaitescu
,Claudia Mehedințu
,Nicolae Gică
Posted: 03 July 2026
IGF-1Eb Isoform May Be Associated with Placental Dysfunction and Vascular Pathology in Idiopathic Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR)
Apostolos Fasoulopoulos
,Michail Varras
,Fani-Niki Varra
,Viktoria-Konstantina Varra
,Anastassios Philippou
,Alexandros Gryparis
,Αrgyro Papadopetraki
,Petros Stellatos
,Athina Pesiridou
,Kleopatra Paparizou
+1 authors
Posted: 01 July 2026
Targeting NF-κB Signaling in Preterm Labor: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Perspectives
Mikołaj Marynowski
,Dominika Mech
,Alicja Mastej
,Angelika Masiarz
,Żaneta Kimber-Trojnar
Posted: 30 June 2026
Artificial Intelligence in Obstetrics: Current Trends and Future Directions
Ittai Many
,Ariel Many
Posted: 23 June 2026
Longitudinal Clinical and Microscopic Response to Dequalinium Chloride in Vulvovaginal Infections: Real-World Evidence from Mexican Gynecological Practice
Gerardo Casanova-Román
,Carolina Navarro-Venegas
,Verónica Ávalos-López
,Cinthya Verver-Moreno
,Henry Velazquez-Soto
,Nataly Arellano-Contreras
,Isabel Garza Ramos Raya
,Israel Casanova-Méndez
Posted: 16 June 2026
Incidence and Risk Factors for Placenta Accreta Spectrum in Placenta Previa: Impact of Placental Type and Location
Akihito Morita
,Yasuhiro Ota
,Shuhei Watanabe
,Kanako Toyoda
,Risa Uehara
,Ayuko Tanaka
,Daisuke Higeta
,Tatsuya Sato
,Akira Iwase
Posted: 15 June 2026
Edible and Medicinal Mushrooms as Sources of Bioactive Molecules in Early Pregnancy: Potential Impact on Preeclampsia and Pre – and Gestational Diabetes Outcomes
Dragan Stajić
,Mirjana Bogavac
,Marko Stojić
,Gabriel Stefan Nađ
,Marko Ilinčić
,Maja Karaman
,Milena Rašeta
,Jovana Mišković
Posted: 05 June 2026
Stress Urinary Incontinence as a Chronic Stress Model: Clinical Evidence and Emerging Epigenetic Implications for Mental Disorders
Despoina Drivakou
,Nikolaos Roussos
,Iakovos Theodoulidis
,Konstadinos Dinas
,Themistoklis Mikos
,Mary H. Kosmidis
Posted: 02 June 2026
Salivary Prevotella qPCR Signal as an Exploratory Non-Invasive Diagnostic Adjunct for Rotterdam Phenotype Stratification in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Arif Tunjungseto
,Oni As'ad Hadi
,Intan Winta Pratiwi
,Fakhriyah Iffatunnisa
,Fadhil Ahsan
,Budi Santoso
Posted: 01 June 2026
Endometriosis and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: Predominance of Overactive Bladder Symptoms and Association with Urethral Mobility and Ultrasonographic Parameters
Katarzyna Tomczyk
,Małgorzata Kampioni
,Magdalena Adamczyk
,Katarzyna Klimaszyk
,Małgorzata Kędzia
Posted: 01 June 2026
Simultaneous Occurrence of Well-Differentiated Papillary Mesothelial Tumor and Multicystic Mesothelioma
Dražen Miličić
,Snježana Tomić
,Boris Delić
,Marko-Dražen Mimica
Posted: 28 May 2026
Comparative Efficacy of Two Electromagnetic Pelvic Floor Stimulation Devices for Urinary Incontinence: A Prospective, Single-Blinded Quality Improvement Study
Amber Bocknek
,Sandra de Montbrun
Posted: 27 May 2026
of 29