Submitted:
26 March 2025
Posted:
27 March 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Background
2.1. Sustainable Fashion Products
2.1.1. Concept of Sustainable Fashion Products
2.1.2. Current Status of Sustainable Fashion Products in China
2.1.3. Current Status of Sustainable Fashion Products Overseas
2.2. Consumer Value
2.3. Theory of Planned Behavior

2.4. Purchase Intention
2.5. Environmental Concern
3. Research Methodology
3.1. Research Subjects

3.2. Research Hypotheses
3.3. Questionnaire Design and Composition
3.4. Data Processing and Analysis Methods
4. Research Results
4.1. Analysis of Sample Characteristics
4.1.1. Demographic Characteristics
4.1.2. General Characteristics
4.2. Reliability and Validity Analysis
4.2.1. Reliability Analysis of Measurement
4.2.2. Feasibility Analysis of Variables
4.3. Confirmatory Factor Analysis
4.4. Correlation Analysis
4.5. Hypothesis Testing
4.5.1. Overall Hypothesis Testing Results on the Impact of Consumer Values in China and South Korea on the Theory of Planned Behavior
4.5.2. Overall Results of Testing the Moderating Effect of Environmental Concern on Consumer Value and Purchase Intention
4.5.3. Interpretation of Analysis Results
5. Conclusion
5.1. Research Summary and Implications
5.1.1. Research Summary
5.1.2. Implications of Research Findings
5.2. Limitations of the Study and Future Research Directions
References
- Available online: https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=16454290134155829.
- Ko Ae-ran & Lee Jeong-soon (2020), "Sustainable Fashion Consumption in the Post-Corona Era," Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol. 31(5), pp. 1-15.
- Jang Nam-kyung (2024), "Sustainable Fashion and Digital Implementation through Big Data Text Mining - Focusing on the Analysis of the Keywords 'Sustainable + Fashion + Digital'," Journal of Fashion Design, Vol. 24(1), pp. 17-32.
- Heo Eun-joo & Han Hee-jeong (2024), "A Qualitative Study on Consumer Awareness Based on Experiences of Purchasing Sustainable Fashion Products," Journal of Basic Design, Vol. 25(1), pp. 459-473.
- Kook, H. S. & Kim, H. Y. (2016), "A Study on Features of Sustainable Zero Waste Fashion Design," Korean Society of Basic Design & Art, Vol. 17(1), pp. 31-45.
- Park Yu-shin & Kim Ji-hye (2020), "Development of Sustainable Fashion Design Prototypes from the Perspective of Clothing Composition - Focusing on Pattern Classes," Fashion Business, Vol. 24(5), pp. 48-66.
- Lee Mi-sook & Kang Yu-hee (2023), "Analysis of YouTube Content on Sustainable Jeans Fashion," Korean Society of Design Culture, Vol. 29(1), pp. 223-238.
- Available online: https://www.sohu.com/a/210788685_313396.
- Available online: https://baike.baidu.com/item.
- Available online: https://daxueconsulting.com/the-future-of-sustainable-fashion-in-china/.
- Available online: https://d.cfw.cn/news/264432-1.html.
- Available online: http://www.nbd.com.cn/rss/toutiao/articles/1425614.html.
- Available online: https://friendoftheearth.org/sustainable-fashion-conference-on-february-21st-2024-agenda/.
- Available online: https://impact.fitnyc.edu/2024-sustainability-conference.
- Available online: http://www.doc88.com/p-38073645317759.html.
- Available online: http://news.ladymax.cn/202305/26-37622.html.
- Zeithmal V A(1988), "Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence”, [J]. Journal of marketing, Vol.52(3), pp.12-22. [CrossRef]
- Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L.(1991), "Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values”, Journal of Business Research, Vol.22(2), pp.159−170.
- Ajzen I(1991), "The theory of planned behavior”, Organizational behavior and human decision processes, Vol.50(2), pp.179-211. [CrossRef]
- Tornikoski, E. and Maalaoui, A.(2019), "Critical reflections – The Theory of Planned Behaviour: An interview with Icek Ajzen with implications for entrepreneurship research”, International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, Vol.37(5), pp.536–550. 10.1177/02662426198296.
- Li, L., Wang, Z., Li, Y. & Liao, A. (2021), "Impacts of consumer innovativeness on the intention to purchase sustainable products”, Sustainable Production and Consumption, Vol(27), pp.774-786.
- Ko, S., & Jin, B. (2017), "Predictors of purchase intention toward green apparel products: A cross-cultural investigation in the USA and China”, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, Vol.(21), pp.70-87. [CrossRef]
- Fraguito  S(2023), "Consumers' Sustainable Fashion Consumption Intention: A Focus on Circular Fashion Practices and Slow Fashion”, PORTO FACULDADE DE ECONOMIA UNIVERSIDADE , Master’s thesis, pp.10-11.
- Jeong Da-won & Kim Young-sam (2022), "A Study on the Factors Influencing Consumers' Purchase Intention and Purchasing Behavior for Sustainable Fashion Products: Based on the E-TPB (Extended Theory of Planned Behavior)," Fashion Business, Vol. 26(5), pp. 105-121.
- Gupta, Manisha, Nishtha Ujjawal Ujjawal, and Shagun Sharma.(2023), "Factor influencing purchase intension of sustainable app.arels among millennials”, Sustainability, Vol.12(1), pp.1123-1149.
- Prabhakar G, Luo X, Tseng H T.(2024), "Exploring generation Z consumers’ purchase intention towards green products during the COVID-19 pandemic in China”, e-Prime-Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy, Vol.(8), p.100552.
- Wahlen, S., & Stroude, A.(2023), “Sustainable consumption, resonance, and care”, Frontiers in Sustainability, Vol.4, p.1013810.
- Lee Hye-ri (2024), "The Impact of Online/Offline Word-of-Mouth Information Characteristics on Purchase Intention - Focusing on the Moderating Effects of Product Involvement and Channel Type," Hongik University, Master's Thesis, p. 33.
- Gold F K, Terner A (2023), "Luxury, Fashion, and Idols-App.lying an extended theory of planned behavior to examine barriers toward sustainable fashion consumption in Japan”,Graduate School, Master thesis, pp.57-73.
- Jeon Chan-ho (2023), "The Impact of Upcycled Products on College Students' Environmental Concern, Environmental Knowledge, and Consumption Values on Purchase Intention and Behavior: Focusing on the Moderating Effect of Residential Area," Gyeongsang National University, Master's Thesis, pp. 21-46.
- Kim Eun-hye (2022), "A Study on the Perceived Benefits and Sacrifices of an Eco-Friendly Fashion Curation Platform on Perceived Consumer Value and Purchase Intention: Focusing on the Moderating Effect of Conspicuous Consumption Tendency," Kookmin University, Master's Thesis, pp. 18-52.
- Yang Il-jeong (2024), "A Study on the Design Characteristics of Upcycling Products and Purchase Intention of Chinese Consumers: The Mediating Effect of Perceived Value," Korea University, Doctoral Dissertation, pp. 134-140.
- Song Ji-an (2024), "A Study on the Antecedents of Purchase Intention for Upcycling Fashion Products: Focusing on Environmental Values and the Theory of Planned Behavior," Korean Design Forum, Vol. 29(2), pp. 7-20.
- Smelt, Famke(2024), "Determinants influencing consumers’ purchase intention of sustainable fashion: the moderating roles of green skepticism and environmental concern”, MS thesis. University of Twente, pp.45-63.
- Hasan, A. A. T. (2023), "Theory of repeat purchase behavior (TRPB): a case of green hotel visitors of Bangladesh”, Int.J.Tour. Cities 9, pp.462–480.
- Prakash, G., Singh, P. K., Ahmad, A., & Kumar, G. (2023), "Trust, convenience and environmental concern in consumer purchase intention for organic food”, Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC, Vol.27(3), pp.367–388.
- Hudayah, Syarifah, et al(2023), "Green perceived value and green product purchase intention of Gen Z consumers: Moderating role of environmental concern”, Environmental Economics, Vol.14(2),pp.87-102.
- Iqbal A, Kazmi S Q, & Anwar A,(2023), “Impact of green marketing on green purchase intention and green consumption behavior: the moderating role of green concern”, Journal of Positive School Psychology, pp.975-993.
- Duan, Jingyang, Mingyang Zhang, & Baodong Cheng(2023), "Study on consumers’ purchase intentions for carbon-labeled products”, Sustainability, Vol.15(2), p.1116.
- Aravindan, Kalisri Logeswaran, et al(2023), "Modeling positive electronic word of mouth and purchase intention using theory of consumption value”, Sustainability , Vol.15(4), p.3009.
- Shin Jun-ho (2023), "The Impact of Consumer Value on Attitudes Toward Eco-friendly Bakery Products, Purchase Intentions, and Willingness to Pay a Premium Price," Dong-Eui University, Master's Thesis, pp. 23-51.
- Putri, Fatwasari Soeratno, & Shinta Permata Sari(2023), "Consumption Value and Thalers' Utility Theory: Observations on Generation Zs' Green Purchase Intention in Indonesia”,International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Publications, Vol.5(12), pp.249-254.
- Lin C C, Dong C M.(2023), "Exploring consumers’ purchase intention on energy-efficient home app.liances: Integrating the theory of planned behavior, perceived value theory, and environmental awareness”, [J]. Energies, Vol.16(6), p.2669.
- Jang Bo-hyun (2024), "A Study on the Sustainability of Consumption Based on Consumer Value and Satisfaction with Vegan Cosmetics," Ajou University, Master's Thesis, pp. 63-65.
- Lee Eun-ah (2024), "The Impact of MZ Generation's Consumer Value on Attitudes Toward Recycled Fiber Fashion Products, Brand Satisfaction, and Purchase Intentions: Focusing on the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA)," Konkuk University, Doctoral Dissertation, pp. 48-68.
| Item | Category | Number of People(%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall(1308) | China(716) | South Korea(592) | ||
| Gender | Male | 636(48.62%) | 356(49.72%) | 276(46.62%) |
| Female | 672(51.38%) | 360(50.28%) | 316(53.38%) | |
| Grade | 1st Year | 353(26.99%) | 193(26.96%) | 160(27.03%) |
| 2nd Year | 349(26.68%) | 186(25.98%) | 163(27.53%) | |
| 3rd Year | 316(24.16%) | 177(24.72%) | 139(23.48%) | |
| 4th Year | 290(22.17%) | 160(22.35%) | 130(21.96%) | |
| Major | Art and Design Series | 273(20.87%) | 93(12.99%) | 180(30.41%) |
| Humanities and Social Sciences Series | 215(16.44%) | 101(14.11%) | 114(19.26%) | |
| Teacher Training Series | 122(9.33%) | 119(16.62%) | 3(0.51%) | |
| Engineering Series | 242(18.5%) | 142(19.83%) | 100(16.89%) | |
| Natural Sciences Series | 81(6.19%) | 74(10.34%) | 7(1.18%) | |
| Business and Economics Series | 118(9.02%) | 104(14.53%) | 14(2.36%) | |
| Health Series | 215(16.44%) | 67(9.36%) | 148(25.00%) | |
| Other | 42(3.21%) | 16(2.23%) | 26(4.39%) | |
| Average Monthly Pocket Money | Below 2000RMB | 378(28.9%) | 191(26.68%) | 187(31.59%) |
| 2000-3000RMB | 403(30.81%) | 208(29.05%) | 195(32.94%) | |
| 3000-4000RMB | 274(20.95%) | 155(21.65%) | 119(20.10%) | |
| 4000-5000RMB | 135(10.32%) | 102(14.25%) | 33(5.57%) | |
| Above5000RMB | 118(9.02%) | 60(8.38%) | 58(9.80%) | |
| Item | Category | Number of People(%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | China | South Korea | |||
| Where do you mainly purchase fashion products | Online Channels | Official Brand Websites | 819(62.61%) | 456(63.69%) | 363(61.32%) |
| Social Media | 515(39.37%) | 396(55.31%) | 119(20.1%) | ||
| Live Streaming | 222(16.97%) | 197(27.51%) | 25(4.22%) | ||
| Mobile Applications | 631(48.24%) | 374(52.23%) | 257(43.41%) | ||
| Others | 95(7.26%) | 57(7.96%) | 38(6.42%) | ||
| Offline Channels | Brand Specialty Stores | 836(63.91%) | 463(64.66%) | 373(63.01%) | |
| Department Stores | 606(46.33%) | 376(52.51%) | 230(38.85%) | ||
| Markets | 215(16.44%) | 166(23.18%) | 49(8.28%) | ||
| Others | 134(10.24%) | 70(9.78%) | 64(10.81%) | ||
| Reasons for purchasing sustainable fashion products | Environmental Protection | 630(48.17%) | 437(61.03%) | 193(32.6%) | |
| Personal Health | 345(26.38%) | 270(37.71%) | 75(12.67%) | ||
| Pursuit of Personal Values | 368(28.13%) | 173(24.16%) | 195(32.94%) | ||
| Human Care and Social Recognition | 171(13.07%) | 117(16.34%) | 54(9.12%) | ||
| Good Wearing Feeling | 251(19.19%) | 146(20.39%) | 105(17.74%) | ||
| Functionality and Practicality | 509(38.91%) | 299(41.76%) | 210(35.47%) | ||
| Resource Reuse | 488(37.31%) | 394(55.03%) | 94(15.88%) | ||
| Others | 66(5.05%) | 50(6.98%) | 16(2.7%) | ||
| Interest in sustainable fashion products | Indifferent | 74(5.66%) | 42(5.87%) | 32(5.41%) | |
| Unconcerned | 169(12.92%) | 76(10.61%) | 93(15.71%) | ||
| Average | 341(26.07%) | 101(14.11%) | 240(40.54%) | ||
| Concerned | 531(40.6%) | 361(50.42%) | 170(28.72%) | ||
| Very Concerned | 193(14.76%) | 136(18.99%) | 57(9.63%) | ||
| Willingness to purchase sustainable fashion products | Willing | 864(66.06%) | 503(70.25%) | 361(60.98%) | |
| Unwilling | 110(8.41%) | 96(13.41%) | 14(2.36%) | ||
| Don't Know | 334(25.54%) | 117(16.34%) | 217(36.66%) | ||
| Categories of purchased sustainable fashion products | Clothing (tops/pants/underwear, etc.) | 912(69.72%) | 479(66.9%) | 433(73.14%) | |
| Bagged Goods | 464(35.47%) | 304(42.46%) | 160(27.03%) | ||
| Groceries (accessories, scarves, hats, etc.) | 489(37.39%) | 377(52.65%) | 112(18.92%) | ||
| Others | 124(9.48%) | 93(12.99%) | 31(5.24%) | ||
| Most influential factors in purchasing decisions | Personal Attention | 793(60.63%) | 435(60.75%) | 358(60.47%) | |
| Family and Friends' Recommendations | 335(25.61%) | 198(27.65%) | 137(23.14%) | ||
| Online and Mobile Advertising | 468(35.78%) | 295(41.2%) | 173(29.22%) | ||
| Television Advertising | 375(28.67%) | 354(49.44%) | 21(3.55%) | ||
| Print Advertising (magazines, newspapers, flyers, etc.) | 376(28.75%) | 344(48.04%) | 32(5.41%) | ||
| Celebrity and Others' Wearing | 461(35.24%) | 392(54.75%) | 69(11.66%) | ||
| Past Purchase Experience | 472(36.09%) | 413(57.68%) | 59(9.97%) | ||
| Sales Staff's Recommendations | 202(15.44%) | 186(25.98%) | 16(2.7%) | ||
| Others | 67(5.12%) | 32(4.47%) | 35(5.91%) | ||
| Most important factors when purchasing sustainable fashion products | Design (color/style) | 858(65.60%) | 493(68.85%) | 365(61.66%) | |
| Material | 540(41.28%) | 395(55.17%) | 145(24.49%) | ||
| Fashion | 486(37.16%) | 410(57.26%) | 76(12.84%) | ||
| Quality (wear comfort/functionality) | 542(41.44%) | 361(50.42%) | 181(30.57%) | ||
| Price | 416(31.8%) | 289(40.36%) | 127(21.45%) | ||
| Brand | 371(28.36%) | 311(43.44%) | 60(10.14%) | ||
| Others | 58(4.43%) | 43(6.01%) | 15(2.53%) | ||
| Factors | Measurement Variables | Number of Items | Cronbach’s α |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption value | Functional value | 6 | 0.964 |
| Social value | 6 | 0.960 | |
| Emotional value | 6 | 0.955 | |
| Precious value | 5 | 0.971 | |
| Ethical value | 6 | 0.963 | |
| the Theory of Planned Behavior | Subjective norm | 4 | 0.972 |
| Attitude | 6 | 0.956 | |
| Perceived behavioral control | 5 | 0.937 | |
| Purchase intention | Purchase intention | 5 | 0.957 |
| Environmental concern | Environmental concern | 4 | 0.976 |
| Item | Factor | Communality | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Value | Ethical Value | Social Value | Emotional Value | Precious Value | |||
| I-1 | 0.966 | 0.054 | 0.103 | 0.034 | 0.071 | 0.953 | |
| I-2 | 0.936 | 0.067 | 0.105 | 0.038 | 0.075 | 0.899 | |
| I-3 | 0.871 | 0.034 | 0.054 | 0.038 | 0.068 | 0.769 | |
| I-4 | 0.912 | 0.040 | 0.077 | 0.009 | 0.058 | 0.843 | |
| I-5 | 0.873 | 0.027 | 0.132 | 0.041 | 0.044 | 0.784 | |
| I-6 | 0.931 | 0.054 | 0.103 | 0.026 | 0.061 | 0.885 | |
| I-7 | 0.109 | 0.061 | 0.920 | 0.084 | 0.072 | 0.874 | |
| I-8 | 0.095 | 0.053 | 0.926 | 0.068 | 0.063 | 0.878 | |
| I-9 | 0.085 | 0.055 | 0.877 | 0.053 | 0.080 | 0.789 | |
| I-10 | 0.095 | 0.053 | 0.911 | 0.092 | 0.062 | 0.854 | |
| I-11 | 0.075 | 0.068 | 0.868 | 0.094 | 0.065 | 0.777 | |
| I-12 | 0.117 | 0.061 | 0.919 | 0.094 | 0.085 | 0.878 | |
| I-13 | 0.016 | 0.090 | 0.095 | 0.923 | 0.101 | 0.880 | |
| I-14 | 0.054 | 0.087 | 0.077 | 0.905 | 0.094 | 0.844 | |
| I-15 | 0.041 | 0.083 | 0.064 | 0.851 | 0.103 | 0.747 | |
| I-16 | 0.012 | 0.092 | 0.082 | 0.888 | 0.091 | 0.812 | |
| I-17 | 0.011 | 0.067 | 0.081 | 0.860 | 0.087 | 0.758 | |
| I-18 | 0.054 | 0.112 | 0.080 | 0.931 | 0.111 | 0.901 | |
| I-19 | 0.077 | 0.104 | 0.086 | 0.126 | 0.966 | 0.973 | |
| I-20 | 0.073 | 0.088 | 0.084 | 0.125 | 0.957 | 0.952 | |
| I-21 | 0.052 | 0.091 | 0.080 | 0.114 | 0.883 | 0.810 | |
| I-22 | 0.076 | 0.094 | 0.093 | 0.119 | 0.958 | 0.955 | |
| I-23 | 0.090 | 0.108 | 0.071 | 0.092 | 0.892 | 0.829 | |
| I-24 | 0.048 | 0.919 | 0.069 | 0.079 | 0.087 | 0.865 | |
| I-25 | 0.055 | 0.926 | 0.055 | 0.098 | 0.072 | 0.878 | |
| I-26 | 0.035 | 0.857 | 0.055 | 0.081 | 0.096 | 0.754 | |
| I-27 | 0.034 | 0.933 | 0.069 | 0.095 | 0.075 | 0.891 | |
| I-28 | 0.068 | 0.872 | 0.046 | 0.081 | 0.081 | 0.780 | |
| I-29 | 0.035 | 0.955 | 0.058 | 0.098 | 0.086 | 0.934 | |
| Eigenvalues | 5.135 | 5.109 | 5.054 | 4.953 | 4.495 | — | |
| Percentage% | 17.709 | 17.618 | 17.429 | 17.079 | 15.501 | — | |
| Cumulative Percentage% | 17.709 | 35.326 | 52.755 | 69.835 | 85.336 | — | |
| KMO | 0.934 | ||||||
| Bartlett's Test of Sphericity | Approximate Chi-Square | 49853.289 | |||||
| Degrees of Freedom | 406 | ||||||
| Significance | 0.000 | ||||||
| Item | Factor | Communality | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attitude | Perceived Behavioral Control | Subjective Norm | ||
| Ⅱ-1 | 0.095 | 0.082 | 0.978 | 0.972 |
| Ⅱ-2 | 0.098 | 0.063 | 0.971 | 0.956 |
| Ⅱ-3 | 0.076 | 0.061 | 0.906 | 0.830 |
| Ⅱ-4 | 0.094 | 0.070 | 0.969 | 0.953 |
| Ⅱ-5 | 0.892 | 0.115 | 0.104 | 0.820 |
| Ⅱ-6 | 0.911 | 0.108 | 0.074 | 0.847 |
| Ⅱ-7 | 0.860 | 0.097 | 0.050 | 0.752 |
| Ⅱ-8 | 0.910 | 0.091 | 0.070 | 0.841 |
| Ⅱ-9 | 0.870 | 0.119 | 0.084 | 0.778 |
| Ⅱ-10 | 0.956 | 0.112 | 0.080 | 0.933 |
| Ⅱ-11 | 0.123 | 0.908 | 0.072 | 0.845 |
| Ⅱ-12 | 0.111 | 0.901 | 0.046 | 0.826 |
| Ⅱ-13 | 0.099 | 0.838 | 0.059 | 0.716 |
| Ⅱ-14 | 0.091 | 0.923 | 0.068 | 0.865 |
| Ⅱ-15 | 0.128 | 0.868 | 0.053 | 0.773 |
| Eigenvalues | 4.958 | 4.033 | 3.715 | — |
| Percentage% | 33.055 | 26.884 | 24.767 | — |
| Cumulative Percentage% | 33.055 | 59.939 | 84.706 | — |
| KMO | 0.912 | |||
| Bartlett's Test of Sphericity | Approximate Chi-Square | 23996.000 | ||
| Degrees of Freedom | 105 | |||
| Significance | 0.000 | |||
| Item | Factor | Communality |
|---|---|---|
| Purchase Intention | ||
| Ⅲ-1 | 0.954 | 0.910 |
| Ⅲ-2 | 0.946 | 0.895 |
| Ⅲ-3 | 0.881 | 0.776 |
| Ⅲ-4 | 0.968 | 0.937 |
| Ⅲ-5 | 0.889 | 0.790 |
| Eigenvalues | 4.307 | — |
| Percentage% | 86.136 | — |
| Cumulative Percentage% | 86.136 | — |
| KMO | 0.909 | |
| Bartlett's Test of Sphericity | Approximate Chi-Square | 8082.670 |
| Degrees of Freedom | 10 | |
| Significance | 0.000 | |
| Item | Factor | Communality |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Concern | ||
| IV-1 | 0.988 | 0.976 |
| IV-2 | 0.984 | 0.968 |
| IV-3 | 0.919 | 0.845 |
| IV-4 | 0.982 | 0.964 |
| Eigenvalues | 3.753 | — |
| Percentage% | 93.821 | — |
| Cumulative Percentage% | 93.821 | — |
| KMO | 0.864 | |
| Bartlett's Test of Sphericity | Approximate Chi-Square | 10333.795 |
| Degrees of Freedom | 6 | |
| Significance | 0.000 | |
| Scale | Dimension | Item | Path Coefficient | Standardized Path Coefficient | C.R. | AVE | CR | Fit Indices |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption value | Functional value | I-1 | 1 | 0.988 | — | 0.827 | 0.966 | CMIN/DF=1.846, GFI=0.966, AGFI=0.960, NFI=0.987, CFI=0.994, RMR=0.011, RMSEA=0.025, IFI=0.994, TLI=0.993 |
| I-2 | 0.897 | 0.935 | 86.250*** | |||||
| I-3 | 0.620 | 0.844 | 54.410*** | |||||
| I-4 | 0.858 | 0.897 | 68.630*** | |||||
| I-5 | 0.628 | 0.847 | 55.243*** | |||||
| I-6 | 0.898 | 0.938 | 87.644*** | |||||
| Social value | 1-7 | 1 | 0.928 | — | 0.810 | 0.962 | ||
| I-8 | 0.930 | 0.927 | 61.574*** | |||||
| I-9 | 0.685 | 0.857 | 48.779*** | |||||
| I-10 | 0.916 | 0.909 | 57.786*** | |||||
| I-11 | 0.671 | 0.846 | 47.260*** | |||||
| I-12 | 0.939 | 0.930 | 62.265*** | |||||
| Emotional value | I-13 | 1 | 0.932 | — | 0.790 | 0.957 | ||
| I-14 | 0.920 | 0.901 | 56.707*** | |||||
| I-15 | 0.656 | 0.828 | 45.185*** | |||||
| I-16 | 0.902 | 0.883 | 53.477*** | |||||
| I-17 | 0.654 | 0.833 | 45.882*** | |||||
| I-18 | 0.960 | 0.948 | 67.760*** | |||||
| Precious value | I-19 | 1 | 0.997 | — | 0.882 | 0.974 | ||
| I-20 | 0.907 | 0.977 | 155.188*** | |||||
| I-21 | 0.630 | 0.857 | 59.372*** | |||||
| I-22 | 0.930 | 0.981 | 168.508*** | |||||
| I-23 | 0.648 | 0.874 | 64.248*** | |||||
| Ethical value | I-24 | 1 | 0.916 | — | 0.822 | 0.965 | ||
| I-25 | 0.958 | 0.930 | 60.240*** | |||||
| I-26 | 0.680 | 0.829 | 44.346*** | |||||
| I-27 | 0.974 | 0.935 | 61.248*** | |||||
| I-28 | 0.677 | 0.847 | 46.579*** | |||||
| I-29 | 0.987 | 0.973 | 70.811*** | |||||
| Theory of Planned Behavior | Subjective norm | Ⅱ-1 | 1 | 0.992 | 0.907 | 0.975 | CMIN/DF=2.510, GFI=0.978, AGFI=0.970, NFI=0.991, CFI=0.995, RMR=0.010, RMSEA=0.034, IFI=0.995, TLI=0.993 |
|
| Ⅱ-2 | 0.911 | 0.977 | 141.910*** | |||||
| Ⅱ-3 | 0.653 | 0.858 | 58.624*** | |||||
| Ⅱ-4 | 0.909 | 0.977 | 142.102*** | |||||
| Attitude | Ⅱ-5 | 1 | 0.887 | 0.795 | 0.959 | |||
| Ⅱ-6 | 0.926 | 0.902 | 50.348*** | |||||
| Ⅱ-7 | 0.692 | 0.828 | 41.676*** | |||||
| Ⅱ-8 | 0.922 | 0.902 | 50.238*** | |||||
| Ⅱ-9 | 0.685 | 0.848 | 43.742*** | |||||
| Ⅱ-10 | 0.994 | 0.976 | 62.019*** | |||||
| Perceived behavioral control | Ⅱ-11 | 1 | 0.902 | 0.758 | 0.940 | |||
| Ⅱ-12 | 0.908 | 0.889 | 48.948*** | |||||
| Ⅱ-13 | 0.673 | 0.789 | 38.112*** | |||||
| Ⅱ-14 | 0.947 | 0.924 | 53.802*** | |||||
| Ⅱ-15 | 0.692 | 0.842 | 43.305*** | |||||
| Purchase intention | Purchase intention | Ⅲ-1 | 1 | 0.949 | 0.830 | 0.960 | CMIN/DF=4.541, GFI=0.993, AGFI=0.980, NFI=0.997, CFI=0.998, RMR=0.004, RMSEA=0.052, IFI=0.998, TLI=0.996 |
|
| Ⅲ-2 | 0.912 | 0.938 | 71.253*** | |||||
| Ⅲ-3 | 0.631 | 0.832 | 47.763*** | |||||
| Ⅲ-4 | 0.935 | 0.976 | 86.519*** | |||||
| Ⅲ-5 | 0.662 | 0.850 | 50.535*** | |||||
| Environmental concern | Environmental concern | IV-1 | 1 | 0.996 | 0.921 | 0.979 | CMIN/DF=1.576, GFI=0.999, AGFI=0.994, NFI=1.000, CFI=1.000, RMR=0.001, RMSEA=0.021, IFI=1.000, TLI=1.000 |
|
| IV-2 | 0.927 | 0.986 | 182.679*** | |||||
| IV-3 | 0.632 | 0.866 | 61.674*** | |||||
| IV-4 | 0.925 | 0.984 | 173.345*** |
| Functional value | Social value | Emotional value | Precious value | Ethical value | Subjective norm | Attitude | Perceived behavioral control | Purchase intention | Environmental concern | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional value | 1 | |||||||||
| Social value | 0.218*** | 1 | ||||||||
| Emotional value | 0.088** | 0.193*** | 1 | |||||||
| Precious value | 0.162*** | 0.187*** | 0.246*** | 1 | ||||||
| Ethical value | 0.114*** | 0.146*** | 0.209*** | 0.209*** | 1 | |||||
| Subjective norm | 0.153*** | 0.284*** | 0.203*** | 0.195*** | 0.233*** | 1 | ||||
| Attitude | 0.247*** | 0.230*** | 0.277*** | 0.262*** | 0.266*** | 0.187*** | 1 | |||
| Perceived behavioral control | 0.311*** | 0.273*** | 0.273*** | 0.296*** | 0.237*** | 0.149*** | 0.243*** | 1 | ||
| Purchase intention | 0.445*** | 0.505*** | 0.419*** | 0.443*** | 0.458*** | 0.343*** | 0.387*** | 0.389*** | 1 | |
| Environmental concern | 0.599*** | 0.536*** | 0.523*** | 0.531*** | 0.509*** | 0.280*** | 0.365*** | 0.434*** | 0.718*** | 1 |
| Hypothesis Result | Estimate | S.E. | Standardized Estimate | C.R. | P | Remarks | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | H1-1 | Functional value | → | Subjective norm | 0.062 | 0.023 | 0.074 | 2.772 | 0.006 | Established |
| H1-2 | Social value | → | Subjective norm | 0.210 | 0.026 | 0.217 | 8.066 | *** | Established | |
| H1-3 | Emotional value | → | Subjective norm | 0.105 | 0.026 | 0.108 | 4.033 | *** | Established | |
| H1-4 | Precious value | → | Subjective norm | 0.085 | 0.023 | 0.096 | 3.626 | *** | Established | |
| H1-5 | Ethical value | → | Subjective norm | 0.160 | 0.025 | 0.169 | 6.303 | *** | Established | |
| H1-6 | Functional value | → | Attitude | 0.135 | 0.021 | 0.172 | 6.454 | *** | Established | |
| H1-7 | Social value | → | Attitude | 0.106 | 0.024 | 0.118 | 4.392 | *** | Established | |
| H1-8 | Emotional value | → | Attitude | 0.166 | 0.024 | 0.184 | 6.832 | *** | Established | |
| H1-9 | Precious value | → | Attitude | 0.124 | 0.022 | 0.150 | 5.696 | *** | Established | |
| H1-10 | Ethical value | → | Attitude | 0.159 | 0.024 | 0.180 | 6.727 | *** | Established | |
| H1-11 | Functional value | → | Perceived behavioral control | 0.187 | 0.020 | 0.250 | 9.377 | *** | Established | |
| H1-12 | Social value | → | Perceived behavioral control | 0.138 | 0.023 | 0.161 | 6.019 | *** | Established | |
| H1-13 | Emotional value | → | Perceived behavioral control | 0.147 | 0.023 | 0.171 | 6.376 | *** | Established | |
| H1-14 | Precious value | → | Perceived behavioral control | 0.141 | 0.021 | 0.179 | 6.781 | *** | Established | |
| H1-15 | Ethical value | → | Perceived behavioral control | 0.113 | 0.022 | 0.134 | 5.044 | *** | Established | |
| CMIN/DF=2.006,GFI=0.940,AGFI=0.933,NFI=0.976,CFI=0.988,RMR=0.094,RMSEA=0.028,IFI=0.988,TLI=0.987 | ||||||||||
| H2 | H2-1 | Subjective norm | → | Purchase intention | 0.246 | 0.023 | 0.266 | 10.802 | *** | Established |
| H2-2 | Attitude | → | Purchase intention | 0.291 | 0.025 | 0.296 | 11.750 | *** | Established | |
| H2-3 | Perceived behavioral control | → | Purchase intention | 0.325 | 0.026 | 0.318 | 12.476 | *** | Established | |
| CMIN/DF=2.821,GFI=0.964,AGFI=0.955,NFI=0.986,CFI=0.991,RMR=0.086,RMSEA=0.037,IFI=0.991,TLI=0.989 | ||||||||||
| H3 | H3-1 | Functional value | → | Purchase intention | 0.248 | 0.015 | 0.340 | 16.475 | *** | Established |
| H3-2 | Social value | → | Purchase intention | 0.319 | 0.018 | 0.382 | 18.020 | *** | Established | |
| H3-3 | Emotional value | → | Purchase intention | 0.215 | 0.017 | 0.257 | 12.361 | *** | Established | |
| H3-4 | Precious value | → | Purchase intention | 0.203 | 0.016 | 0.265 | 13.012 | *** | Established | |
| H3-5 | Ethical value | → | Purchase intention | 0.279 | 0.017 | 0.340 | 16.180 | *** | Established | |
| CMIN/DF=2.348,GFI=0.945,AGFI=0.937,NFI=0.979,CFI=0.988,RMR=0.122,RMSEA=0.032,IFI=0.988,TLI=0.987 | ||||||||||
| Model | Variable | B | se | t | p | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H4-1 | Constant | 3.101 | 0.017 | 181.103 | 0.000 | Established |
| Functional value | 0.033 | 0.021 | 1.618 | 0.106 | ||
| Environmental concern | 0.577 | 0.019 | 29.739 | 0.000 | ||
| Functional value×Environmental concern | 0.085 | 0.017 | 4.913 | 0.000 | ||
| H4-2 | Constant | 3.112 | 0.016 | 191.013 | 0.000 | Established |
| Social value | 0.150 | 0.021 | 7.221 | 0.000 | ||
| Environmental concern | 0.522 | 0.018 | 28.625 | 0.000 | ||
| Social value×Environmental concern | 0.077 | 0.018 | 4.273 | 0.000 | ||
| H4-3 | Constant | 3.103 | 0.017 | 187.730 | 0.000 | Established |
| Emotional value | 0.044 | 0.021 | 2.096 | 0.036 | ||
| Environmental concern | 0.573 | 0.018 | 31.273 | 0.000 | ||
| Emotional value×Environmental concern | 0.102 | 0.019 | 5.373 | 0.000 | ||
| H4-4 | Constant | 3.097 | 0.016 | 190.319 | 0.000 | Established |
| Precious value | 0.078 | 0.020 | 3.903 | 0.000 | ||
| Environmental concern | 0.564 | 0.018 | 30.830 | 0.000 | ||
| Precious value×Environmental concern | 0.110 | 0.017 | 6.425 | 0.000 | ||
| H4-5 | Constant | 3.124 | 0.016 | 191.157 | 0.000 | Established |
| Ethical value | 0.109 | 0.020 | 5.503 | 0.000 | ||
| Environmental concern | 0.539 | 0.018 | 29.815 | 0.000 | ||
| Ethical value×Environmental concern | 0.049 | 0.018 | 2.799 | 0.005 |
| Hypothesis | Validation Result | |
|---|---|---|
| H1 | Consumer value will have a positive impact on consumers' planned behavior (subjective norms, attitudes, perceived behavioral control). | Accepted |
| H1-1 | The functional value of consumer value will have a positive impact on consumers' planned behavior subjective norms. | Accepted |
| H1-2 | The social value of consumer value will have a positive impact on consumers' planned behavior subjective norms. | Accepted |
| H1-3 | The emotional value of consumer value will have a positive impact on consumers' planned behavior subjective norms. | Accepted |
| H1-4 | The precious value of consumer value will have a positive impact on consumers' planned behavior subjective norms. | Accepted |
| H1-5 | The ethical value of consumer value will have a positive impact on consumers' planned behavior subjective norms. | Accepted |
| H1-6 | The functional value of consumer value will have a positive impact on consumers' planned behavior attitudes. | Accepted |
| H1-7 | The social value of consumer value will have a positive impact on consumers' planned behavior attitudes. | Accepted |
| H1-8 | The emotional value of consumer value will have a positive impact on consumers' planned behavior attitudes. | Accepted |
| H1-9 | The precious value of consumer value will have a positive impact on consumers' planned behavior attitudes. | Accepted |
| H1-10 | The ethical value of consumer value will have a positive impact on consumers' planned behavior attitudes. | Accepted |
| H1-11 | The functional value of consumer value will have a positive impact on consumers' planned behavior perceived behavioral control. | Accepted |
| H1-12 | The social value of consumer value will have a positive impact on consumers' planned behavior perceived behavioral control. | Accepted |
| H1-13 | The emotional value of consumer value will have a positive impact on consumers' planned behavior perceived behavioral control. | Accepted |
| H1-14 | The precious value of consumer value will have a positive impact on consumers' planned behavior perceived behavioral control. | Accepted |
| H1-15 | The ethical value of consumer value will have a positive impact on consumers' planned behavior perceived behavioral control. | Accepted |
| H2 | Consumers' planned behavior (subjective norms, attitudes, perceived behavioral control) will have a positive impact on the purchase intention of sustainable fashion products. | Accepted |
| H2-1 | The subjective norms of consumers' planned behavior will have a positive impact on the purchase intention of sustainable fashion products. | Accepted |
| H2-2 | The attitudes of consumers' planned behavior will have a positive impact on the purchase intention of sustainable fashion products. | Accepted |
| H2-3 | The perceived behavioral control of consumers' planned behavior will have a positive impact on the purchase intention of sustainable fashion products. | Accepted |
| H3 | Consumer value will have a positive impact on the purchase intention of sustainable fashion products. | Accepted |
| H3-1 | The functional value of consumer value will have a positive impact on the purchase intention of sustainable fashion products. | Accepted |
| H3-2 | The social value of consumer value will have a positive impact on the purchase intention of sustainable fashion products. | Accepted |
| H3-3 | The emotional value of consumer value will have a positive impact on the purchase intention of sustainable fashion products. | Accepted |
| H3-4 | The precious value of consumer value will have a positive impact on the purchase intention of sustainable fashion products. | Accepted |
| H3-5 | The ethical value of consumer value will have a positive impact on the purchase intention of sustainable fashion products. | Accepted |
| H4 | Environmental concern will play a positive moderating role between consumer value and purchase intention. | Accepted |
| H4-1 | Environmental concern will play a positive moderating role between the functional value of consumer value and purchase intention. | Accepted |
| H4-2 | Environmental concern will play a positive moderating role between the social value of consumer value and purchase intention. | Accepted |
| H4-3 | Environmental concern will play a positive moderating role between the emotional value of consumer value and purchase intention. | Accepted |
| H4-4 | Environmental concern will play a positive moderating role between the precious value of consumer value and purchase intention. | Accepted |
| H4-5 | Environmental concern will play a positive moderating role between the ethical value of consumer value and purchase intention. | Accepted |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
