Submitted:
28 August 2024
Posted:
28 August 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
- Do consumer consider sustainability attributes as an evaluation criteria for their purchasing decision?
- Does environmentally responsible purchase intention matter for consumers when buying apparel products?
- What are the factors that significantly affect Ethiopian consumers’ environmentally sustainable apparel product purchase intention and behavior?
2. Literature Review
2.1. Theoretical Review
2.2. Related Work and Hypotheses
2.2.1. Determinants of Intention to Sustainable Consumption
2.2.1.1. Environmental Concern
2.2.1.2. Attitude (ATT) towards Environmental Sustainability
2.2.1.3. Perceived Consumer Effectiveness
2.2.1.4. Subjective Norms
2.2.1.5. Availability of Information
2.2.1.6. Ethical Obligation
2.2.1.7. Perceived Behavior Control (PBC)
2.2.2. Mediating Variables
2.2.2.1. Product Availability
2.2.2.2. Price Perception
2.2.3. Sustainable Consumption Willingness to Behave and Purchasing Behavior
2.3. Conceptual Frame Work of the Study
3. Methodology
3.1. Research Design
3.2. Sampling and Data Collection
3.3. Sample Size Determination
| SS= (Z-score) 2 * StdDev*(1-StdDev) / (margin of error) 2 SS = (1.96) ² * 0.5*(1-0.5) / (0.05) ² SS = 3.8416 * 0.25 / 0.0025 SS = 384.16 ~ 385 In a survey study, many factors will happen such as missing data, non-response, unable to contact the respondents, missing during collection, and others, so to compensate for such factors the researcher will add a 10 - 50% allowance to the calculated sample size as suggested by (Dell et al., 2002; Lenth, 2001). Therefore, for this study, 50% were added, and 50% of 385 respondents became 193. Totally 578 respondents were needed. |
3.4. Data Collection Instruments
3.5. Data Analysis
4. Result
4.1. Demographic Characteristics of Respondents
4.2. Descriptive Analysis
4.3. Model Validations and Verifications
4.3.1. Final CFA Model Measurement Scale

4.3.1.1. Structural Model Analysis (SEM)
4.4. Hypotheses Testing
4.5. Content Analysis to Open-Ended Questions
4.6. Discussions and Implications of the Study
4.6.1. Determinants of Sustainable Consumption Willingness to Behave
4.6.1.1. Environmental Concern with Consumers’ Willingness to Behave
4.6.1.2. Consumer Attitude with Consumers’ Willingness to Behave
4.6.1.3. Perceived Consumer Effectiveness with Consumers’ Willingness to Behave
4.6.1.4. Subjective Norm with Consumers’ Willingness to Behave
4.6.1.5. Availability of Information with Consumers’ Willingness to Behave
4.6.1.6. Ethical Obligation with Consumers’ Willingness to Behave
4.6.1.7. Perceived Behavior Control with Consumers’ Willingness to Behave
4.6.2. The Mediating Effects of Product Availability and Price Perception
4.6.3. Determinants of Sustainable Consumption Behavior
5. Conclusions
5.1. Managerial and Practical Implications
5.2. Theoretical Implications
5.3. Limitation
5.4. Future Research
Note
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
References
- Abdul-Muhmin, A. G. (2007). Explaining consumers’ willingness to be environmentally friendly. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(3), 237–247. [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, U. N. U., & Amin, S. M. (2012). The Dimensions of Technostress among Academic Librarians. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65(ICIBSoS), 266–271. [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
- Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior1. Journal OfApplied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665–683.
- Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior : Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologie, April, 1–11. [CrossRef]
- Alam, M. Z., & Abunar, S. (2023). Appraising the Buyers Approach Towards Sustainable Development with Special Reference to Buying Habits and Knowledge Source of Green Packaging: A Cross-Sectional Study. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, 19, 400–411. [CrossRef]
- Alarcón, D., Sánchez, J. A., & De Olavide, U. (2015). Assessing convergent and discriminant validity in the ADHD-R IV rating scale: User-written commands for Average Variance Extracted (AVE), Composite Reliability (CR), and Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio of correlations (HTMT). Spanish STATA Meeting, 39.
- Albloushy, H., & Hiller Connell, K. Y. (2019). Purchasing environmentally sustainable apparel: The attitudes and intentions of female Kuwaiti consumers. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 43(4), 390–401. [CrossRef]
- Amit Kumar, G. (2021). Framing a model for green buying behavior of Indian consumers: From the lenses of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 295, 126487. [CrossRef]
- Anastasia, N., & Santoso, S. (2020). Effects of Subjective Norms, Perceived Behavioral Control, Perceived Risk, and Perceived Usefulness towards Intention to Use Credit Cards in Surabaya, Indonesia. SHS Web of Conferences, 76, 01032. [CrossRef]
- Anquez, E., Raab, K., Cechella, F. S., & Wagner, R. (2022). Consumers’ Perception of Sustainable Packaging in the Food Industry. Revista Direitos Culturais, 17(41), 251–265. [CrossRef]
- Antil, J. H. (1984). Socially Responsible Consumers: Profile and Implications for Public Policy. Journal of Macromarketing, 4(2), 18–39. [CrossRef]
- Anwar, K., Adi, P. H., & Afif, N. C. (2019). The Effect of Consumer Ethical Beliefs on Green Buying Intention : Social Dilemma as a Mediating Variable. International Conference on Rural Development and Enterpreneurship, 5(1), 252–261.
- Apaolaza, V., Paredes, M. R., Policarpo, M. C., Souza, C. D., & Hartmann, P. (2022). Sustainable clothing : Why conspicuous consumption and greenwashing matter. Business Strategy and The Environment, 2023(23), 3766–3782. [CrossRef]
- Astika Nithasyah, Farhana, Z., & Rahayu, F. (2023). Consequences of Environmental Concern, Health Consciousness, and Perceived Behavior Control. The Management Journal of Binaniaga, 8(1), 57–70. [CrossRef]
- Bick, R., Halsey, E., & Ekenga, C. C. (2018). The global environmental injustice of fast fashion. Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source, 17(1), 1–4. [CrossRef]
- Borovskikh, V., & Albareda, A. L. (2020). SUSTAINABILITY IN FASHION INDUSTRY : STRATEGY AND PRACTICE.
- Borusiak, B., Szymkowiak, A., Horska, E., Raszka, N., & Zelichowska, E. (2020). Towards building sustainable consumption: A study of second-hand buying intentions. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(3), 1–15. [CrossRef]
- Boson, L. T., Elemo, Z., Engida, A., & Kant, S. (2023). Assessment of Green Supply Chain Management Practices on Sustainable Business in Ethiopia Assessment of Green Supply Chain Management Practices on Sustainable Business in Ethiopia. Logistics and Operation Management, 2(1), 96–104. [CrossRef]
- Bui, T., Lim, M. K., Sujanto, R. Y., Ongkowidjaja, M., & Tseng, M. (2022). Building a Hierarchical Sustainable Consumption Behavior Model in Qualitative Information : Consumer Behavior Influences on Social Impacts and Environmental Responses. Sustainability, 14(9877), 1–22.
- Byrne, B. m. (2011). Structural Equation Modeling with Mplus_ Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming.
- Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural Equation Modeling with M plus: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming.
- Caferra, R., Imbert, E., Schirone, D. A., Tiranzoni, P., & Morone, A. (2023). Consumer analysis and the role of information in sustainable choices: A natural experiment. Frontiers in Environmental Economics, 1. [CrossRef]
- Carol Cavender, R. (2018). Exploring the Influence of Sustainability Knowledge and Orientation to Slow Consumption on Fashion Leaders’ Drivers of Fast Fashion Avoidance. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business, 4(3), 90. [CrossRef]
- Ceylan, Ö. (2019). Knowledge, attitudes and behavior of consumers towards sustainability and ecological fashion. Textile and Leather Review, 2(3), 154–161. [CrossRef]
- Chang, H. J., & Watchravesringkan, K. (Tu). (2018). Who are sustainably minded apparel shoppers? An investigation to the influencing factors of sustainable apparel consumption. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 46(2), 148–162. [CrossRef]
- Chi, T., Gerard, J., Yu, Y., & Wang, Y. (2021). A study of U.S. consumers’ intention to purchase slow fashion apparel: understanding the key determinants. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 14(1), 101–112. [CrossRef]
- ÇIVGIN, H., & KIZANLIKLI, M. (2022). Davranışsal Niyetin Yeşil Satın Alma Niyeti Üzerindeki Etkisinde Kontrol İnançların Aracı Rolü: Turizm Sektöründe Bir Araştırma. Güncel Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(2), 536–553. [CrossRef]
- Dash, G., & Paul, J. (2021). CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173(June), 121092. [CrossRef]
- Debnath, B., Siraj, T., Harun, K., Rashid, O., Bari, A. B. M. M., Lekha, C., & Al, R. (2023). Sustainable Manufacturing and Service Economics Analyzing the critical success factors to implement green supply chain management in the apparel manufacturing industry : Implications for sustainable development goals in the emerging economies. Sustainable Manufacturing and Service Economics, 2(September 2022), 1–12. [CrossRef]
- Dell, R. B., Holleran, S., & Ramakrishnan, R. (2002). Sample size determination. ILAR Journal, 43(4), 207–212. [CrossRef]
- DEMİRBAŞ, E. (2016). PRO-ENVIRONMENTAL CONCLUSIONS of CONSUMERS’ ENDURING INVOLVEMENT with RECYCLED PRODUCTS: ECO-AWARE PURCHASING BEHAVIOR and PSYCHOGRAPHICS. Journal of Administrative Sciences, 21(48), 275–309.
- Dhir, A., Sadiq, M., Talwar, S., Sakashita, M., & Kaur, P. (2021). Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services Why do retail consumers buy green apparel ? A knowledge-attitude-behaviour-context perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59(September 2020), 102398. [CrossRef]
- Durrani, S., Sohail, M., & Rana, M. W. (2023). The Influence of Shopping Motivation On Sustainable Consumption: A Study Related To Eco-Friendly Apparel. Journal of Social Sciences Review, 3(2), 248–268.
- Eagly, A. H. (2007). THE ADVANTAGES OF AN INCLUSIVE DEFINITION OF ATTITUDE. Social Cognition, 25(5), 582–602.
- Edeh, E., Lo, W.-J., & Khojasteh, J. (2023). Review of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook. In Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal (Vol. 30, Issue 1). [CrossRef]
- Ellen, P. S., Wiener, J. L., & Cobb-Walgren, C. (1991). The Role of Perceived Consumer Effectiveness in Motivating Environmentally Conscious Behaviors. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 10(2), 102–117. [CrossRef]
- Eng, J. (2003). Sample size estimation: How many individuals should be studied? Radiology, 227(2), 309–313. [CrossRef]
- Fedrigo, D., & Hontelez, J. (2010). Sustainable consumption and production. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 14(1), 10–12. [CrossRef]
- Fischer, D., Reinermann, J., Guillen, G., Desroches, C. T., Diddi, S., & Vergragt, P. J. (2021). Sustainable consumption communication : A review of an emerging fi eld of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 300, 126880. [CrossRef]
- Floriano, M. D. P., & de Matos, C. A. (2022). Understanding Brazilians’ Intentions in Consuming Sustainable Fashion. Brazilian Business Review, 19(5), 525–545. [CrossRef]
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA.
- Forsyth, D. R. (1980). A taxonomy of ethical ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(1), 175–184. [CrossRef]
- Fu, S., Ma, R., He, G., Chen, Z., & Liu, H. (2023). A study on the influence of product environmental information transparency on online consumers’ purchasing behavior of green agricultural products. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(April), 1–11. [CrossRef]
- Gallo, T., Pacchera, F., Cagnetti, C., & Silvestri, C. (2023). Do Sustainable Consumers Have Sustainable Behaviors? An Empirical Study to Understand the Purchase of Food Products. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(5). [CrossRef]
- Ghaffar, A., & Islam, T. (2023). Factors leading to sustainable consumption behavior : an empirical investigation among millennial consumers. Kybernetes. [CrossRef]
- Gierszewska, G., & Seretny, M. (2019). Sustainable Behavior-The Need of Change in Consumer and Business Attitudes and Behavior. Foundations of Management, 11(1), 197–208. [CrossRef]
- Gonçalves, J., Santos, A. R., Kieling, A. P., & Tezza, R. (2022). The influence of environmental engagement in the decision to purchase sustainable cosmetics: An analysis using the Theory of Planned Behavior. Revista de Administração Da UFSM, 15(3), 541–562. [CrossRef]
- Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling ( PLS-SEM ) Using R.
- Hasan, A. A. (2024). Theory of sustainable consumption behavior ( TSCB ) to predict renewable energy consumption behavior : A case of eco-tourism visitors of Bangladesh. Renewable Energy Consumption Behavior, 35(1), 101–118. [CrossRef]
- Hasan, M. (2022). Application of Theory of Planned Behavior to Understand Application of Theory of Planned Behavior to Understand Sustainable Clothing Consumption: Testing the Effect of Sustainable Clothing Consumption: Testing the Effect of Materialism and Sustainability . 7–7. https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd/1600.
- Hasbullah, N. N., Sulaiman, Z., & Mas, A. (2022). Drivers of Sustainable Apparel Purchase Intention : An Empirical Study of Malaysian Millennial Consumers. Sustainability, 14(1945), 1–24.
- Hassan, S. H., Yeap, J. A. L., & Al-Kumaim, N. H. (2022). Sustainable Fashion Consumption: Advocating Philanthropic and Economic Motives in Clothing Disposal Behaviour. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(3), 1–17. [CrossRef]
- Hong, J., Zhang, Y., & Ding, M. (2017). Sustainable supply chain management practices, supply chain dynamic capabilities, and enterprise performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 1–24. [CrossRef]
- Hosta, M., & Zabkar, V. (2021). Antecedents of Environmentally and Socially Responsible Sustainable Consumer Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 171(2), 273–293. [CrossRef]
- Hur, E., & Cassidy, T. (2019). Perceptions and attitudes towards sustainable fashion design: challenges and opportunities for implementing sustainability in fashion. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 12(2), 208–217. [CrossRef]
- Hwang, J., Lee, S., Jo, M., Cho, W., & Moon, J. (2021). The effect of sustainability-related information on the sensory evaluation and purchase behavior towards salami products. Food Science of Animal Resources, 41(1), 95–109. [CrossRef]
- Irene, S., & Gil-saura, I. (2020). Ethically Minded Consumer Behavior, Retailers ’ Commitment to Sustainable Development, and Store Equity in Hypermarkets. Sustainability, 12(8041), 1–17.
- Islam, M. M., & Khan, M. M. R. (2014). Environmental Sustainability Evaluation of Apparel Product: A Case Study on Knitted T-Shirt. Journal of Textiles, 2014, 1–6. [CrossRef]
- Jacobs, A. M. (2018). The Gutenberg English Poetry Corpus: Exemplary Quantitative Narrative Analyses. Frontiers in Digital Humanities, 5(5), 1–14. [CrossRef]
- Kaczorowska, J., Rejman, K., Halicka, E., & Prandota, A. (2019). Influence of B2C Sustainability Labels in the Purchasing Behaviour of Polish Consumers in the Olive Oil Market. Olsztyn Economic Journal, 14(3), 299–311. [CrossRef]
- Kang, J., Liu, C., & Kim, S. H. (2013). Environmentally sustainable textile and apparel consumption: The role of consumer knowledge, perceived consumer effectiveness and perceived personal relevance. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37(4), 442–452. [CrossRef]
- Kasim, A. (2022). Sustainability and Consumer Behaviour. In Sustainability and Consumer Behaviour. [CrossRef]
- Khare, A. (2019). Green Apparel Buying : Role of Past Behavior, Knowledge and Peer Influence in the Assessment of Green Apparel Perceived Benefits Green Apparel Buying : Role of Past Behavior, Knowledge and Peer Influence. Journal of International Consumer Marketing ISSN:, 1530. [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y., & Choi, S. M. (2005). Antecedents of Green Purchase Behavior: An Examination of Collectivism, Environmental Concern, and PCE. Advances in Consumer Research Volume 32, 36, 592–599. http://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/9156/volumes/v32/NA-32 [copyright.
- Kim, Y., & Oh, K. W. (2020). Effects of perceived sustainability level of sportswear product on purchase intention: Exploring the roles of perceived skepticism and perceived brand reputation. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(20), 1–16. [CrossRef]
- Kline, B. (2015). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling.
- Koszewska, M. (2016). Environmental Footprints and Eco-design of Products and Processes (Vol. 1).
- Kovacs, I., & Keresztes, E. R. (2022). Perceived Consumer Effectiveness and Willingness to Pay for Credence Product Attributes of Sustainable Foods. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(7), 1–17. [CrossRef]
- Kumar, B., Manrai, A. K., & Manrai, L. A. (2017). conceptual framework and empirical study crossmark. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 34(August 2015), 1–9. [CrossRef]
- Kumar, R., Kumar, K., Singh, R., Sá, J. C., Carvalho, S., & Santos, G. (2023). Modeling Environmentally Conscious Purchase Behavior: Examining the Role of Ethical Obligation and Green Self-Identity. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(8), 1–16. [CrossRef]
- Lavuri, R. (2022). Extending the theory of planned behavior: factors fostering millennials’ intention to purchase eco-sustainable products in an emerging market. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 65(8), 1507–1529. [CrossRef]
- Lavuri, R. (2023). Exploring the sustainable consumption behavior in emerging countries : The role of pro-environmental self-identity, attitude, and environmental protection emotion. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(8), 5174–5186. [CrossRef]
- Lavuri, R., Jindal, A., Akram, U., Naik, B. K. R., & Halibas, A. S. (2023). Exploring the antecedents of sustainable consumers’ purchase intentions: Evidence from emerging countries. Sustainable Development, 31(1), 280–291. [CrossRef]
- Lenth, R. V. (2001). Some practical guidelines for effective sample size determination. American Statistician, 55(3), 187–193. [CrossRef]
- Lewis, T. L., Park, H., Netravali, A. N., & Trejo, H. X. (2017). Closing the loop: a scalable zero-waste model for apparel reuse and recycling. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 10(3), 353–362. [CrossRef]
- Liang, J., & Xu, Y. (2018). Second-hand clothing consumption: A generational cohort analysis of the Chinese market. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 42(1), 120–130. [CrossRef]
- Lin, C. A., Wang, X., & Yang, Y. (2023). Sustainable Apparel Consumption: Personal Norms, CSR Expectations, and Hedonic vs. Utilitarian Shopping Value. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(11). [CrossRef]
- Lin, T. T., Yeh, Y., & Hsu, S. (2022). Analysis of the Effects of Perceived Value, Price Sensitivity, Word-of-Mouth, and Customer Satisfaction on Repurchase Intentions of Safety Shoes under the Consideration of Sustainability. Sustainability, 14(16546), 1–19.
- Maciaszczyk, M., Kwasek, A., Kocot, M., & Kocot, D. (2022). Determinants of Purchase Behavior of Young E-Consumers of Eco-Friendly Products to Further Sustainable Consumption Based on Evidence from Poland. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(4). [CrossRef]
- Madar, A., Huang, H. H., & Tseng, T.-H. (2013). Do Ethical Purchase Intentions Really Lead to Ethical Purchase Behavior? A Case of Animal-Testing Issues in Shampoo. International Business Research, 6(7), 102–110. [CrossRef]
- Mariadoss, B. J., Chi, T., Tansuhaj, P., & Pomirleanu, N. (2016). Influences of Firm Orientations on Sustainable Supply Chain Management. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3406–3414. [CrossRef]
- McNeill, L., & Venter, B. (2019). Identity, self-concept and young women’s engagement with collaborative, sustainable fashion consumption models. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 43(4), 368–378. [CrossRef]
- Minbale, E., Bizuneh, B., Seife, W., Eyasu, A., Asfaw, T., & Sharew, S. (2024). Ethiopian Consumer ’ s Behavior towards Purchasing Locally Produced Apparel Products : An Extended Model of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Complexity, 2024, 8745919.
- Minh, T. C., Nguyen, N., & Quynh, T. (2024). Factors affecting sustainable consumption behavior : Roles of pandemics and perceived consumer effectiveness. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 12(December 2023), 100158. [CrossRef]
- Mirabi, V., Akbariyeh, H., & Tahmasebifard, H. (2015). A Study of Factors Affecting on Customers Purchase Intention Case Study : the Agencies of Bono Brand Tile in Tehran. Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science and Technology, 2(1), 267–273.
- Misron, A., Che Musa, N., & Mohd Salleh, M. S. (2023). A Conceptual Analysis of Sustainability Labeling on Packaging: Does it Impact Purchase Behavior? International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(5), 2327–2342. [CrossRef]
- Moretto, A., Macchion, L., Lion, A., Caniato, F., Danese, P., & Vinelli, A. (2018). Designing a roadmap towards a sustainable supply chain: A focus on the fashion industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 193, 169–184. [CrossRef]
- Muthukumarana, T. T., Karunathilake, H. P., Punchihewa, H. K. G., Manthilake, M. M. I. D., & Hewage, K. N. (2018). Life cycle environmental impacts of the apparel industry in Sri Lanka: Analysis of the energy sources. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 1346–1357. [CrossRef]
- Nayak, R., Panwar, T., & Van Thang Nguyen, L. (2019). Sustainability in fashion and textiles: A survey from developing country. In Sustainable Technologies for Fashion and Textiles. Elsevier Ltd. [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, P. M., Vo, N. D., & Ho, N. N. Y. (2022). Exploring Green Purchase Intention of Fashion Products: A Transition Country Perspective. Asian Journal of Business Research, 12(2), 87–107. [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, T. H. (2023). Impact of behavioural factors on sustainable fashion usage intention: Evidence from consumers in Ho Chi Minh City. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 11(06), 4939–4955. [CrossRef]
- Niu, N., Fan, W., Ren, M., Li, M., & Zhong, Y. (2023). The Role of Social Norms and Personal Costs on Pro-Environmental Behavior: The Mediating Role of Personal Norms. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 16(May), 2059–2069. [CrossRef]
- O’Rourke, D., & Ringer, A. (2016). The Impact of Sustainability Information on Consumer Decision Making. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 20(4), 882–892. [CrossRef]
- Olbrich, R., Quaas, M. F.., & Baumgärtner, S. (2011). Personal norms of sustainability and their impact on management – The case of rangeland management in semi-arid regions (Issue 209).
- Orcan, F. (2018). Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis: Which One to Use First? Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 9(4), 414–421. [CrossRef]
- Park, H. G., & Lee, Y. J. (2015). The Efficiency and Productivity Analysis of Large Logistics Providers Services in Korea. Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 31(4), 469–476. [CrossRef]
- Park, H. J., & Lin, L. M. (2018). Exploring attitude – behavior gap in sustainable consumption : comparison of recycled and upcycled fashion products. Journal of Business Research, November 2017.
- Park, J., & Ha, S. (2014). Understanding Consumer Recycling Behavior: Combining the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Norm Activation Model. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 42(3), 278–291. [CrossRef]
- Park, M. J., Cho, H., Johnson, K. K. P., & Yurchisin, J. (2017). Use of behavioral reasoning theory to examine the role of social responsibility in attitudes toward apparel donation. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 41(3), 333–339. [CrossRef]
- Paul, J., Modi, A., & Patel, J. (2016). Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 29, 123–134. [CrossRef]
- Pinkse, J., & Bohnsack, R. (2021). Sustainable product innovation and changing consumer behavior: Sustainability affordances as triggers of adoption and usage. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(7), 3120–3130. [CrossRef]
- Polonsky, M. J., Vocino, A., Grau, S. L., Garma, R., & Ferdous, A. S. (2012). The impact of general and carbon-related environmental knowledge on attitudes and behaviour of US consumers. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(3–4), 238–263. [CrossRef]
- Rausch, T. M., & Kopplin, C. S. (2021a). Bridge the gap : Consumers ’ purchase intention and behavior regarding sustainable clothing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 123882. [CrossRef]
- Rausch, T. M., & Kopplin, C. S. (2021b). Bridge the gap: Consumers’ purchase intention and behavior regarding sustainable clothing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 123882. [CrossRef]
- Raza, J., Liu, Y., Zhang, J., Zhu, N., Hassan, Z., Gul, H., & Hussain, S. (2021). Sustainable Supply Management Practices and Sustainability Performance : The Dynamic Capability Perspective. SAGE Open, 10. [CrossRef]
- Ringle, C. M., Saari, U. A., Damberg, S., & Fr, L. (2021). Sustainable consumption behavior of Europeans : The influence of environmental knowledge and risk perception on environmental concern and behavioral intention. Ecological Economics, 189(107155). [CrossRef]
- Rizkalla, N. (2018). Determinants of Sustainable Consumption Behavior: An Examination of Consumption Values, PCE Environmental Concern and Environmental Knowledge. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 8(2). [CrossRef]
- Roberts, J. A., & Bacon, D. R. (1997). Exploring the Subtle Relationships between Environmental Concern and Ecologically Conscious Consumer Behavior. Journal of Business Research, 40(1), 79–89. [CrossRef]
- Rožman, M., Tominc, P., & Milfelner, B. (2020). A Comparative Study Using Two SEM Techniques on Di ff erent Samples Sizes for Determining Factors of Older Employee ’ s Motivation and Satisfaction. Sustainability Article, 12.
- Rumaningsih, M., Zailani, A., Suyamto, & Darmaningrum, K. (2022). Analysing consumer behavioural intention on sustainable organic food products. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 11(9), 404–415. [CrossRef]
- Rusyani, E., Lavuri, R., & Gunardi, A. (2021). Purchasing Eco-Sustainable Products : Interrelationship between Environmental Knowledge, Environmental Concern, Green Attitude, and Perceived Behavior. Sustainability, 13(4601), 1–12.
- Saeed, M. A., Farooq, A., Kersten, W., & Ben Abdelaziz, S. I. (2019). Sustainable product purchase: does information about product sustainability on social media affect purchase behavior? Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 4(1). [CrossRef]
- Sandin, G., & Peters, G. M. (2018). Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling – A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, 353–365. [CrossRef]
- Sesini, G., & Castiglioni, C. (2020). New Trends and Patterns in Sustainable Consumption : A Systematic Review and Research Agenda. Sustainability, 15(5939).
- Setyawan, A., Noermijati, N., Sunaryo, S., & Aisjah, S. (2018). Green product buying intentions among young consumers: Extending the application of theory of planned behavior. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(2), 145–154. [CrossRef]
- Sheikh Qazzafi. (2019). Consumer Buying Decision Process. International Journal of Scientific Research and Engineering Development-, 2(5), 130–133. https://bizfluent.com/how-does-5438201-consumer-buying-decision-process.html.
- Soyer, M., & Dittrich, K. (2021). Sustainable consumer behavior in purchasing, using and disposing of clothes. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(15). [CrossRef]
- Stoll, R. G., Borges, G. D. R., & Buron, T. A. (2019). a Influência Do Consumo Sustentável Na Decisão De Compra De Produtos Orgânicos ## the Influence of Sustainable Consumption in the Decision To Purchase Organic Products. Amazônia, Organizações e Sustentabilidade, 8(1), 129. [CrossRef]
- Sudhakara Reddy, B., & Kumar Ray, B. (2011). Understanding industrial energy use: Physical energy intensity changes in Indian manufacturing sector. Energy Policy, 39(11), 7234–7243. [CrossRef]
- Sutanto, I. S., & Wulandari, R. (2023). The Effect of Price Perception and Product Quality on Consumer Purchase Interest with Attitude and Perceived Behavior Control as an Intervention Study on Environmentally Friendly Food Packaging (Foopak). International Journal of Science and Management Studies (IJSMS), 6(1), 85–99. [CrossRef]
- Tandon, A., Sithipolvanichgul, J., Asmi, F., Anwar, M. A., & Dhir, A. (2023). Drivers of green apparel consumption: Digging a little deeper into green apparel buying intentions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(6), 3997–4012. [CrossRef]
- Tang, T., & Bhamra, T. A. (2009). Understanding Consumer Behaviour to Reduce Environmental Impacts through Sustainable Product Design. Design Research Society Conference, 1970(July), 16–19. http://shura.shu.ac.uk/550/.
- Tanner, C., & Kast, S. W. (2003). Promoting Sustainable Consumption: Determinants of Green Purchases by Swiss Consumers. Psychology and Marketing, 20(10), 883–902. [CrossRef]
- Tantawi, P., Nicholas O’Shaughnessy, & Khaled Gad. (2009). Tantawi-Green Consciousness of Consumers in a Developing Country_ A Study of Egyptian Consumers.pdf.
- Taufique, K. M. R., Vocino, A., & Polonsky, M. J. (2017). The influence of eco-label knowledge and trust on pro-environmental consumer behaviour in an emerging market. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 25(7), 511–529. [CrossRef]
- Testa, F., Pretner, G., Iovino, R., Bianchi, G., & Tessitore, S. (2020). Drivers to green consumption: a systematic review. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 0123456789.
- Thøgersen, J. (2006). Norms for environmentally responsible behaviour: An extended taxonomy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(4), 247–261. [CrossRef]
- Tobias, S., & Carlson, J. E. (1969). Brief report: Bartlett’s test of sphericity and chance findings in factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 4(3), 375–377. [CrossRef]
- Tomkins, S., London, B., Isley, S., & Getoor, L. (2018). Sustainability at scale: Towards bridging the intention-behavior gap with sustainable recommendations. RecSys 2018 - 12th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, 214–218. [CrossRef]
- Varshneya, G., Pandey, S. K., & Das, G. (2017). Impact of Social Influence and Green Consumption Values on Purchase Intention of Organic Clothing: A Study on Collectivist Developing Economy. Global Business Review, 18(2), 478–492. [CrossRef]
- Vlastelica, T., & Kosti, M. (2023). Determinants of Young Adult Consumers ’ Environmentally and Socially Responsible Apparel Consumption. Sustainability, 15(2023), 1–18.
- Wang, J., & Hsu, Y. (2019). Does sustainable perceived value play a key role in the purchase intention driven by product aesthetics? taking smartwatch as an example. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(23). [CrossRef]
- Wang, P., Liu, Q., & Qi, Y. (2014). Factors influencing sustainable consumption behaviors: A survey of the rural residents in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 152–165. [CrossRef]
- Webb, D. J., Mohr, L. A., & Harris, K. E. (2008). A re-examination of socially responsible consumption and its measurement. Journal of Business Research, 61(2), 91–98. [CrossRef]
- Weniger, A., Del Rosario, P., Backes, J. G., & Traverso, M. (2023). Consumer Behavior and Sustainability in the Construction Industry—Relevance of Sustainability-Related Criteria in Purchasing Decision. Buildings, 13(3). [CrossRef]
- White, C. L., Nielsen, A. E., & Valentini, C. (2017). CSR research in the apparel industry: A quantitative and qualitative review of existing literature. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(5), 382–394. [CrossRef]
- Wiederhold, M., & Martinez, L. F. (2018). Ethical consumer behaviour in Germany: The attitude-behaviour gap in the green apparel industry. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 42(4), 419–429. [CrossRef]
- Williams, B., Onsman, A., & Brown, T. (2010). Exploratory factor analysis: A five-step guide for novices Mr. Journal of Emergency Primary Health Care, 8(3), 1–13.
- Xu, Y., Du, J., Khan, M. A. S., Jin, S., Altaf, M., Anwar, F., & Sharif, I. (2022). Effects of Subjective Norms and Environmental Mechanism on Green Purchase Behavior: An Extended Model of Theory of Planned Behavior. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10(February), 1–13. [CrossRef]
- Yi, S. (2019). Determinants of consumers’ purchasing behavior for certified aquaculture products in South Korea. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(14). [CrossRef]
- Yoon, S. W., & Yoon, C. H. (2018). On the impossibility of sustainable growth in a manufacturing based economy. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja , 31(1), 1526–1538. [CrossRef]
- Young, W., Hwang, K., McDonald, S., & Oates, C. J. (2010). Sustainable consumption: Green consumer behaviour when purchasing products. Sustainable Development, 18(1), 20–31. [CrossRef]
- Zeng, Z., Zhong, W., & Naz, S. (2023). Can Environmental Knowledge and Risk Perception Make a Difference? The Role of Environmental Concern and Pro-Environmental Behavior in Fostering Sustainable Consumption Behavior. Sustainability (Switzerland) , 15(6). [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L., Fan, Y., Zhang, W., & Zhang, S. (2019). Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior to Explain the E ff ects of Cognitive Factors across Di ff erent Kinds of Green Products. Sustainability Article, 11, 1–17.
- Zheng, Y., & Chi, T. (2015). Factors influencing purchase intention towards environmentally friendly apparel: An empirical study of US consumers. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 8(2), 68–77. [CrossRef]




| Concern for the environment | |
|
(Abdul-Muhmin, 2007; Antil, 1984; Ellen et al., 1991) |
| Attitude towards Environmentally Sustainable Products | |
|
(Rausch & Kopplin, 2021; Dhir et al., 2021; Kumar et al., 2017) |
| Perceived Behavioral Control (PBC) | |
|
(Hosta & Zabkar, 2021; Paul et al., 2016) |
| Perceived consumer effectiveness (PCE) | |
|
(Ellen et al., 1991; Minh et al., 2024) |
| Social norms | |
|
(Thøgersen, 2006; Paul et al., 2016) |
| Personal norms | |
|
(Thøgersen, 2006) |
| Willingness to behave in an environmentally conscious way | |
|
(Hosta & Zabkar, 2021; Antil, 1984; Paul et al., 2016; Abdul-Muhmin, 2007) |
| Environmentally sustainable consumer behavior | |
|
(Roberts & Bacon, 1997; Webb et al., 2008) (Rausch & Kopplin, 2021; Dhir et al., 2021) |
| Information availability about the environmental impact | |
|
(Hosta & Zabkar, 2021) |
| Ethical obligation | |
|
(Forsyth, 1980) |
| Sustainable product availability | |
|
(Ghaffar & Islam, 2023) |
| Price perception for sustainable product | |
|
(Ghaffar & Islam, 2023) |
| Demographic Variable | Categories | Frequency | Percent | Mean | Chi-Square | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Purchasing Intention | Purchasing Behavior | Asymp. Sig. | ||||
| Gender | Male | 267 | 51.1 | 5.88 | 2.78 | .631 |
| Female | 256 | 48.9 | 5.92 | 2.77 | ||
| Total | 523 | 100.0 | 5.90 | 2.77 | ||
| Age | <18 | 12 | 2.3 | 5.90 | 2.75 | .000 |
| 19-24 | 182 | 34.8 | 5.82 | 2.66 | ||
| 25-34 | 232 | 44.4 | 5.94 | 2.74 | ||
| 35-44 | 66 | 12.6 | 5.89 | 3.02 | ||
| >45 | 31 | 5.9 | 6.09 | 3.13 | ||
| Total | 523 | 100.0 | 5.90 | 2.77 | ||
| Educational level | Primary School | 21 | 4.0 | 6.24 | 2.56 | .000 |
| Secondary School | 27 | 5.2 | 5.78 | 3.09 | ||
| Preparatory School | 24 | 4.6 | 5.85 | 2.31 | ||
| Diploma | 69 | 13.2 | 6.05 | 2.87 | ||
| Degree | 304 | 58.1 | 5.83 | 2.74 | ||
| Masters | 74 | 14.1 | 5.99 | 2.91 | ||
| PHD | 4 | .8 | 4.65 | 2.55 | ||
| Total | 523 | 100.0 | 5.90 | 2.77 | ||
| Marital Status | Unmarried | 302 | 57.7 | 5.90 | 2.77 | .000 |
| Married | 209 | 40.0 | 5.90 | 2.80 | ||
| Divorced | 12 | 2.3 | 5.71 | 2.41 | ||
| Total | 523 | 100.0 | 5.90 | 2.77 | ||
| Income Level | Low Income level(<1,650 birr) | 98 | 18.7 | 5.82 | 2.60 | .000 |
| Lower-middle level (1,651-5,250 birr) | 127 | 24.3 | 5.76 | 2.68 | ||
| Upper-middle level (5,251-10,900 birr) | 184 | 35.2 | 5.99 | 2.89 | ||
| High income (>10,900 birrs) | 114 | 21.8 | 5.97 | 2.84 | ||
| Total | 523 | 100.0 | 5.90 | 2.77 | ||
| Variables | Items | Factor loading | CR | AVE | AVE^2 (DV) |
/df | GFI | CFI | RMSEA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Environmental concern | Con5 | 0.839 | .94 | .76 | .87 | (6310.639/2274) = 2.78 |
.860 | .946 | .092 |
| Con4 | 0.915 | ||||||||
| Con3 | 0.739 | ||||||||
| Con2 | 0.888 | ||||||||
| Con1 | 0.962 | ||||||||
| Consumers attitude | ATTE5 | 0.904 | .96 | .84 | .92 | ||||
| ATTE4 | 0.873 | ||||||||
| ATTE3 | 0.978 | ||||||||
| ATTE2 | 0.86 | ||||||||
| ATTE1 | 0.973 | ||||||||
| Perceived Behavioral control | PBC4 | 0.862 | .95 | .82 | .91 | ||||
| PBC3 | 0.901 | ||||||||
| PBC2 | 0.915 | ||||||||
| PBC1 | 0.947 | ||||||||
| Perceived Behavioral effectiveness |
PCE4 | 0.953 | .97 | .88 | .94 | ||||
| PCE3 | 0.932 | ||||||||
| PCE2 | 0.93 | ||||||||
| PCE1 | 0.935 | ||||||||
| Social norm |
SN3 | 0.937 | .96 | .88 | .94 | ||||
| SN2 | 0.942 | ||||||||
| SN1 | 0.95 | ||||||||
| Personal Norm | PN5 | 0.932 | .98 | .91 | .96 | ||||
| PN4 | 0.947 | ||||||||
| PN3 | 0.98 | ||||||||
| PN2 | 0.973 | ||||||||
| PN1 | 0.943 | ||||||||
| Availability of Information |
IAE4 | 0.883 | .92 | .74 | .86 | ||||
| IAE3 | 0.877 | ||||||||
| IAE2 | 0.825 | ||||||||
| IAE1 | 0.851 | ||||||||
| Ethical obligation |
EO5 | 0.901 | .98 | .90 | .95 | ||||
| EO4 | 0.958 | ||||||||
| EO3 | 0.947 | ||||||||
| EO2 | 0.958 | ||||||||
| EO1 | 0.974 | ||||||||
| Price perception | PRICEP3 | 0.874 | .91 | .77 | .88 | ||||
| PRICEP2 | 0.925 | ||||||||
| PRICEP1 | 0.833 | ||||||||
| Product Availability | AVA1 | 0.761 | .86 | .67 | 82 | ||||
| AVA2 | 0.855 | ||||||||
| AVA3 | 0.834 | ||||||||
| Purchasing Intention |
WTB1 | 0.834 | .92 | .65 | .81 | ||||
| WTB2 | 0.883 | ||||||||
| WTB3 | 0.805 | ||||||||
| WTB4 | 0.804 | ||||||||
| WTB5 | 0.704 | ||||||||
| WTB6 | 0.81 | ||||||||
| Purchasing Behavior | ESCB5 | 0.89 | .92 | .70 | .84 | ||||
| ESCB4 | 0.788 | ||||||||
| ESCB3 | 0.826 | ||||||||
| ESCB2 | 0.817 | ||||||||
| ESCB1 | 0.857 |
| Variables | CR | AVE | AVE^2 (DV) |
/df | GFI | CFI | RMSEA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Environmental concern | .92 | .70 | .84 | (6807.146/2528) = 2.69 |
.884 | .953 | .078 | |
| Consumers attitude | .92 | .72 | .85 | |||||
| Perceived Behavioral control | .82 | .54 | .74 | |||||
| Perceived Behavioral effectiveness | .83 | .56 | .75 | |||||
| Social norm | .70 | .44 | .66 | |||||
| Personal Norm | .97 | .85 | .92 | |||||
| Availability of Information | .87 | .64 | .80 | |||||
| Ethical obligation | .80 | .47 | .68 | |||||
| Price perception | .96 | .88 | .94 | |||||
| Product Availability | .91 | .78 | .88 | |||||
| Purchasing Intention | .92 | .66 | .81 | |||||
| Purchasing Behavior | .88 | .59 | .77 |
| Dependent | Independent | B | Beta | S.E. | C.R. | P | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Willingness | <--- | Concern | .16 | .138 | .049 | 2.799 | .005 | Supported |
| Willingness | <--- | Attitude | .17 | .138 | .044 | 3.147 | .002 | Supported |
| Willingness | <--- | Effectiveness | .22 | .182 | .055 | 3.297 | *** | Supported |
| Willingness | <--- | Social | .16 | .179 | .078 | 2.290 | .022 | Supported |
| Willingness | <--- | Personal | .03 | .026 | .070 | .367 | .714 | unsupported |
| Willingness | <--- | Information | .12 | .142 | .067 | 2.110 | .035 | Supported |
| Willingness | <--- | Ethics | .17 | .141 | .070 | 2.006 | .045 | Supported |
| Willingness | <--- | Control | .11 | .144 | .064 | 2.261 | .024 | Supported |
| Availability | <--- | Willingness | .43 | .442 | .038 | 11.507 | *** | Supported |
| Price | <--- | Willingness | .40 | .424 | .038 | 11.270 | *** | Supported |
| Behavior | <--- | Willingness | .29 | .333 | .052 | 6.355 | *** | Supported |
| Behavior | <--- | Control | .15 | .235 | .078 | 3.001 | .003 | Supported |
| Behavior | <--- | Price | .13 | .140 | .055 | 2.550 | .011 | Supported |
| Behavior | <--- | Availability | .12 | .133 | .059 | 2.254 | .024 | Supported |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).