Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Circulating Potassium/Magnesium Ratio, Thyroid Stimulating Hormone, Fasting Plasma Glucose, Oxidized LDL/Albumin Ratio, and Urinary Iodine Concentration Possible Entities for Screening for Preeclampsia in Low-Resource Settings

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

28 February 2025

Posted:

28 February 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Background: Several micro and macronutrient malnutrition states that are routinely as-sessed during clinical care of women in the antenatal period have been proposed as risk factors for preeclampsia. However, there is a paucity of data on the potential use of these biomarkers for detection of preeclampsia. The aim of this case-control study was to inves-tigate the association of biomarkers from routine clinical tests, and those specific to micro and macronutrient malnutrition, with the risk of preeclampsia. Methods: Venous blood samples of 250 participants with preeclampsia and 150 pregnant women without preeclampsia were collected and assayed immediately for the full blood count, urea and electrolytes, high-density cholesterol (HDL), total cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), oxidized low-density lipoprotein (OxLDL), selenium in addition to Urine iodine concentration (UIC). Results: The serum potassium/magnesium ratio (K+/Mg2+), UIC, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), lymphocyte percentage (L/WBC%), and the oxidized LDL/albumin ratio (OxLDL/Alb) were identified as independent predictors of preeclampsia. Conclusion: Serum Potassium/Magnesium ratio and other analytes, essential for various biological processes, some of which are assayed during routine care, were significantly associated with preeclampsia warranting further exploration as potential screening biomarkers in low-resource settings.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Preeclampsia complicates 3 to 8% of all pregnancies and is one of the major causes of perinatal mortality and morbidity [1]. In the long term, it also accounts for an increased risk of premature cardiovascular diseases in both mothers and their offspring, secondary to structural modification of proteins, lipids and epigenetic changes that affect DNA expression. Several risk factors for preeclampsia have been identified. These include a maternal or family history of preeclampsia or hypertension, ethnicity, extremes maternal age, primiparity, primipaternity, in-vitro fecundation (IVF), multiple pregnancy, obesity, and systemic disorders such as diabetes mellitus (DM), kidney disease, autoimmune diseases [1]. In an attempt to identify women at high risk of preeclampsia, several biomarkers have been studied. These include serum and plasma markers of placental function, endothelial dysfunction, renal dysfunction, general metabolic status, oxidative stress, and haemolysis and inflammation. However, most biomarkers have yielded low sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of preeclampsia [2,3,4]. So far, the main predictive markers are those that are associated with placental function which include the placental growth factor (PlGF), and soluble Fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1) [2,3,4,5]. The PlGF has been found to identify women at risk of preeclampsia from as early as 11 weeks of amenorrhoea (WOA) while the sFlt-1 is more predictive of preeclampsia among women with gestation age ≥ 20 WOA [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13].
Studies from central Africa showed that both micronutrient (selenium and iodine deficiency) and macronutrient malnutrition (obesity) were risk factors for preeclampsia [14,15]. This retrospective case-control study was conducted to investigate the biomarkers from routine blood tests and those specific to micro and macronutrient nutrition that are associated with the risk of preeclampsia [16].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

This study was carried out as a secondary analysis of archived data (case-control study design) of pregnant women who were part of the Communicable Disease, Nutritional, Environmental Epidemiology and Cardio-metabolic Risk Study conducted in Kinshasa Province, Democratic Republic of Congo between 2007 and 2008 at Lomo Medical Centre, Kinshasa Limete.

2.2. Study Population

One hundred and fifty normotensive pregnant women at term were enrolled in the Communicable Disease, Nutritional, Environmental Epidemiology, and Cardio-metabolic Risk Study upon diagnosis and matched for age and parity with three hundred participants with preeclampsia 150 controls (a ratio of 1 control: 2 cases). However, 50 participants were excluded from the current study due to incomplete data.

2.3. Methods

Pre-eclampsia was defined according to the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy [17] Participants were diagnosed with pre-eclampsia when they presented with new onset of hypertension (>140 mmHg systolic (SBP) and or >90 mmHg diastolic (DBP) blood pressure) after 20 weeks gestation with proteinuria (spot urine protein/creatinine >30 mg/ mmol, or >300 mg/day or 2 + on dipstick testing) or other maternal organ dysfunction: renal insufficiency (creatinine >90 umol/L; 1.02 mg/dL); liver involvement (elevated transaminases – at least twice upper limit of normal ± right upper quadrant or epigastric abdominal pain), neurological complications (altered mental status, blindness, stroke, hyperreflexia, severe headaches, and persistent visual scotomata), haematological complications (thrombocytopenia – platelet count below 150,000/dL, disseminated intravascular coagulation or haemolysis) and uteroplacental dysfunction (foetal growth restriction, abruptio placentae or intrauterine foetal death). Participants were diagnosed with severe pre-eclampsia when they presented with SBP >160 mmHg or DBP >110 mmHg with or without systemic organ involvement. Participants were diagnosed with eclampsia when they presented with SBP >140 mmHg or DBP >90 mmHg after 20 weeks gestation accompanied by convulsions.
Trained nurses measured height, weight, waist circumference (WC), SBP and DBP to standardized procedures. Blood pressure was measured according to the American Heart Association guidelines, with the patient’s elbow flexed at the heart level. The average of the two measurements with a standard mercury sphygmomanometer taken at intervals ≥ 2 minutes after the participants had been sitting for at least 30 minutes was used [18].
Venous blood was collected from the cubital fossa between 7:00 and 9:00 a.m. into ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and sodium fluoride (NaF) vacutainers. The samples were processed and assayed immediately to measure the full blood count (FBC), Urea and electrolytes (U&E), the concentrations of high-density cholesterol (HDL), total cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), oxidised low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL), C–peptide, and glucose. Laboratory data were obtained using calibrated and standard routine procedures and specific protocols of the manufacturers’ such as CyFlowR Counter (Partec GmH, Munster, Germany), Hydrasys system, Serbia, Evry, France), spectrophotomer Hospital Diagnostics (Florence, Italy), kits of Biome’rieux (Marcy l’Etoile, France) and Mercodia AB (Silveniusgatan 8 A, SE754, Uppsala, Sweden, and a caloric Sensor Hach DR/2010 spectophotomer (HACH, USA). TSH was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method purchased from DIALAB GmbH IZ-NOE Sued Company, Hondastrasse, Objekt M55, A- 2351 wr, Neudorf, Austria. NO was measured using Cayman kits (Cayman Chemical Company Ann Arbot, MI). Urinary iodine concentration was measured using the Sandell-Kolthof method.
Variables studied as possible predictors of preeclampsia included morphological markers such as waist circumference (WC) and hip circumference (HC) for metabolic syndrome (MS), systolic and diastolic blood pressure, while laboratory data were circulating markers or biomarkers associated with metabolic syndrome which included: triglycerides, total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, glucose, and uric acid; NO for endothelial dysfunction; Vitamin C for exogenous anti-oxidants; Lymphocytes percent, serum ferritin, anti-Helicobacter pylori IgG, GGT and CRP for inflammation, infections, and cytokines; Selenium deficiency a key trace element in nutrition and oxLDL for oxidative stress imbalance and atherosclerosis; Cortisol for distress hormone; UIC and TSH for iodine nutrition and thyroid hormones.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Proportions of categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test, while means of continuous variables were compared using Student’s t-test or ANOVA. The Kruskal-The Wallis test was used to compare the medians of non-normally distributed data. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Logistic regression was carried out to identify the biomarkers that can act as independent predictors of preeclampsia in the study population. The diagnostic performance of these biomarkers at discriminating preeclamptic participants and normotensive controls was tested using the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). The areas under the curve (AUC) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals, the Standard error, and the sensitivity and specificity at the optimal cut-off values of the candidate diagnostic biomarkers were calculated. These optimal cut-offs were derived using the Youden index method. All analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows version 23.0 (SPSS Inc) Chicago, IL, USA.

3. Results

3.1. General Characteristics

The median (IQR) age was 33 (29 – 37.5) years for cases and 33.5 (33.5 – 37) years for controls, p = 0.135. The median (IQR) gestational age (weeks of amenorrhea) at recruitment and sample collection was 32 (24 – 37.5) for cases and 39 (38 – 39) for controls, p <0.001.

3.2. Biomarkers Associated with Preeclampsia

Table 1 summarizes the median (25th and 75th percentile) serum values of several biomarkers of cases and controls. This univariate analysis showed higher levels (p<0.05) of low-density cholesterol (LDL), oxidized low-density cholesterol (OxLDL), triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), waist circumference (WC), hip circumference (HC), body mass index (BMI), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), cortisol, TSH, T3, T4, OxLDL /Albumin ratio, γ-glutamyl transferase (GGT), C-reactive protein (CRP), potassium/magnesium ratio among cases of preeclampsia than controls.
The levels of vitamin C, selenium, nitric oxide (NO), lymphocytes, serum magnesium and urinary iodine concentration (UIC), were lower (p<0.05) among cases of preeclampsia than controls. However, the serum HDL and potassium levels were not significantly different (p ≥ 0.05) between cases of preeclampsia and normotensive controls.

3.3. Independent Predictors of Preeclampsia

All biomarkers that were signifcantly associated with preeclampsia on univariate analysis were entered a the binary logistic model. After adjustment for confounding factors (all variables not maintained in the equation), only the oxdLDL/albumin ratio, lymphocyte percentage, UIC, K+/Mg2+ ratio, TSH and FPG were identified as significant predictors of preeclampsia (Table 2).

3.4. The AUC, Optimal Thresholds, Sensitivity and Specificity of the Independent Predictors of Preeclampsia

The AUC, optimal thresholds, sensitivity and specificity at the optimal threshold of those significant biomarkers, are shown in Table 3. The AUC ranged from 0.75 (95% CI 0.69-0.80) for the OxLDL/Alb ratio to 0.97 (0.95-0.99) for K+/Mg2+ . Sensitivities at optimal threshold ranged from 60% for nitric oxide to 98% for UIC, and specificity from 63.2% for % lymphocyte to 96% for selenium.

4. Discussion

In the current study, the analytes identified as independent predictors of preeclampsia were the oxidized LDL/albumin ratio, lymphocyte levels, urine iodine concentration, serum potassium/magnesium ratio, TSH, and FPG. This suggests the need for closer attention to the role of a high energy-low protein diet, iodine deficiency, subclinical hypothyroidism, magnesium deficiency, and gestational diabetes in the increased risk of preeclampsia in the study population.
Preeclampsia is a multisystem disorder for which clinical symptoms and signs alone cannot adequately predict adverse maternal and foetal outcomes [19]. Previous research in high-resource settings has revealed the potential utility of placental-derived factors for the prediction and early diagnosis of preeclampsia especially the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio [20,21]. Of the variables identified as independent predictors of preeclampsia in the current study, the serum potassium/magnesium ratio had the highest area under the curve. Therefore, the serum potassium/magnesium ratio, which is more affordable compared to the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio, is potentially a candidate screening test for women at high risk of preeclampsia in low resource settings if our results can be confirmed by future studies as recommended by the World Health Organization [22].
In the current study, the median, 25th, and 75th percentile levels of serum magnesium were not only significantly reduced among preeclamptic women compared to normotensive controls, but were also much lower than the lower limit of normal serum magnesium of 0.74 – 0.95 mmol/L [23,24]. The median levels of serum potassium were comparable (Table 1) between cases and controls, implying that it is the relationship between the individual pregnant woman’s potassium and magnesium levels that may determine the risk of preeclampsia. The main known cause of hypomagnesaemia is low dietary intake [25,26]. Globally, the prevalence of hypomagnesaemia is between 2.5 – 15% despite the availability of foods rich in magnesium including whole grains, leafy vegetables and nuts [26]. It is estimated that about 85% of magnesium is lost during food processing putting populations dependent on processed foods at high risk of hypomagnesaemia especially in the era of nutrition transition and urbanization that is sweeping across the developing world [27].
Several other researchers found lower levels of serum magnesium with no significant difference in serum potassium among women with preeclampsia compared to controls [28,29,30,31,32,33]. Taken together, our findings and those from previous research suggest that the potassium/magnesium ratio may indeed be a good biomarker for the prediction of incident preeclampsia at any gestation age. The high diagnostic potential of the serum potassium/magnesium ratio for preeclampsia, with a specificity and sensitivity in the current study similar to that of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio [5,20] makes it a potential candidate biomarker warranting further exploration for use in resource-limited resource settings and populations at risk. Moreover, both magnesium and potassium are excreted in urine which provides an opportunity for assessing whether the urinary magnesium/potassium ratio may show similar diagnostic performance which may pave the way for even a more affordable urine dipstick potassium/magnesium screening test for preeclampsia that can be used in primary health care clinics.
Magnesium is required for the maintenance of physiological levels of cellular potassium levels [34]. Magnesium is a cofactor of the Na+/K+ ATPase whose malfunction secondary to hypomagnesaemia results in the depletion of intracellular K+ and accumulation of intracellular Na+. This stimulates the Na+-Ca2+ pump exchange activity resulting in high intracellular Ca2+ with resultant vasoconstriction leading to hypertension [35,36,37]. Secondly, in vivo and in vitro studies have confirmed that inadequate magnesium intake/hypomagnesaemia leads to endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress, insulin resistance and hyperlipidaemia which are known mechanisms in the pathology of preeclampsia and precursors of atherosclerosis [27,38]. Magnesium deficiency increases the transport of low-density lipoproteins across the endothelium whose accumulation in the sub-endothelial space is associated with incident atherosclerosis [38,39]. Hence, hypomagnesaemia coupled with a high-energy diet or obesity may multiply the risk of preeclampsia and cardiovascular disease. Indeed, in one study it was found that carotid intima-media thickness, an early marker of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease, was significantly higher among preeclamptic women when compared to normotensive controls [14].
In the current study, the mean urine iodine excretion (UIC) was the biomarker with the second-best diagnostic potential for preeclampsia after the serum K+/Mg2+ ratio. At a cut-off of 239 µg/L, UIC had a sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 80% for the diagnosis of preeclampsia. Previous studies have also shown an association between UIC and preeclampsia [40,41,42]. Although the standard practice has been the use of median UIC of school-age children (SAC) for the identification of populations at risk of inadequate iodine intake, SAC UIC is not usually representative of pregnant women and other population groups at high risk of iodine deficiency [43,44]. Some have found that there is a daily variation of UIC concentration making it a less accurate measure of iodine nutrition for individualized assessment [45,46,47]. Rasmussen et al. found that the fasting UIC tends to underestimate the 24-hour UIC compared to samples taken later in the day [48]. However, all UIC values taken at various times of the day were highly correlated with the 24-hour UIC with a correlation coefficient (r) ranging between 0.61-0.74.
About 70 µg of iodine is required for daily thyroid hormone synthesis in an iodine-replete individual with sufficient intra-thyroid iodine storage of 15-20 mg [49]. In physiological pregnancy, the net daily iodine requirements increase to about 120 µg. In chronically iodine-deficient individuals with intra-thyroid iodine storage of about 2-5 mg compensatory mechanisms will increase thyroid iodide trapping by about 50% [49]. In women with moderate to severe iodine deficiency in pregnancy, most of the iodine consumed will be taken up by the thyroid gland, the placenta and the foetus leading to low serum iodide levels. Hence these women are likely to present with persistently low UIC despite increased renal iodine clearance [49], making UIC a feasible test in pregnant women with moderate to severe iodine deficiency.
Iodine deficiency predisposes to preeclampsia through defective placental angiogenesis in the first trimester which leads to ischaemia, atherogenesis and oxidative stress, diminished PlGF production, increased trophoblastic apoptosis and elevated sFlt-1 secretion leading to maternal systemic endothelial dysfunction [50,51]. In addition, the low serum levels of iodine, one of the most important exogenous anti-oxidants leads to oxidative imbalance and further endothelial activation, dysfunction, and more severe manifestation of preeclampsia [52,53].
In the current study, FPG had the third-best AUC for discriminating pre-eclampsia. Interestingly, the optimal cut-off (95mg/dL) is close to the fasting blood sugar level of 5.3 mmol /L recommended for diagnosis of gestational diabetes by the American Diabetic Association [54]. Therefore, routine screening for diabetes using FPG among pregnant women can also identify women at risk of preeclampsia. This is not surprising as most markers associated with insulin resistance in the current study such as dyslipidaemia and high BMI were significantly higher among cases than controls.
Consistent with other studies [55,56,57], our data seem to suggest that SCH is associated with preeclampsia as exemplified by T3 and T4 levels within the normal range for both cases and controls, but an elevated mean TSH level for cases of 5.90 ± 2.56 mIU/L well above the recommended pregnancy upper limit of 2.5 - 3 mIU/L. The underlying cause of SCH in the study population seems to be iodine deficiency whose sensitivity and specificity were better than that of TSH. This together with the high cost of TSH would preclude its routine use as a screening test for preeclampsia in low-resource settings.
The fairly good capacity of a lower percentage of lymphocytes as a predictor of preeclampsia observed in the current study could be attributed to the relative increase in neutrophils. Canzoneri et al. found a significantly higher total leukocyte count among women with severe preeclampsia due to the marked increase in neutrophil numbers: 8.05 ± 4.01 (severe preeclampsia) versus 6.69 ± 2.23 (mild preeclampsia) and 5.90 ± 1.79 (controls) respectively, p < 0.0001 [58]. Preeclampsia is associated with the activation of neutrophils and other leukocytes with enhanced superoxide production, and the release of endothelial mediators such as tumour necrotic factor alpha and interleukin-8 that lead to endothelial dysfunction [59,60].
Consistent with other studies the risk of preeclampsia was much higher among women with elevation of both oxidised LDL and triglycerides [61,62]. The oxidised LDL/albumin ratio had a fairly high sensitivity but low specificity probably because low exogenous antioxidant deficiency may play a significant role in the early stages of preeclampsia while renal and hepatic injury associated with a significant reduction in albumin levels occur in late and severe preeclampsia.
As for serum TSH, the low sensitivity and specificity of the lymphocyte percentage and the oxidised LDL/albumin ratio preclude their potential use as potential screening tests for preeclampsia.

Study Limitations

The current study is limited by the case-control study design which precluded the ascertainment of temporal relationship between the observed values of the biomarkers and preeclampsia. The performance of screening tests would better be evaluated with prospective cohort studies, especially for the detection of early-onset preeclampsia that is associated with more perinatal complications [63]. Secondly, the performance of some screening tests may vary according to regional, socio-economic, and ethnic differences which may affect the universal application of the cut-off values [64].

5. Conclusion

The serum potassium/magnesium ratio, which can be obtained from routine laboratory tests, showed a high potential as a biomarker for screening and detection of women at risk of preeclampsia. The urinary iodine concentration, serum TSH, the oxidized LDL/albumin ratio and FPG, and lymphocytosis may be useful in the prediction of women at increased risk of preeclampsia respectively among populations with iodine deficiency, micronutrient malnutrition, and recurrent infections.

Supplementary Materials

The data is available from the authors upon request. This article is a revised and expanded version of a poster presentation at the Clinical Research & Biomarkers conference, July 19-20, 2018, Prague, Czech Republic titled: Serum potassium/magnesium ratio, urinary iodine concentration, thyroid stimulating hormone, fasting plasma glucose and the oxidized LDL/albumin ratio: potential biomarkers of preeclampsia.

Author Contributions

BCB conceived and designed the study, participated in data analysis, and wrote the first draft. LMB prepared the data set, participated in the statistical analysis, and edited the first draft. KAP critically reviewed the first manuscript and ensured that the appropriate statistical tests were applied. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Lomo Medical Centre Institutional Review Board (Reference no. LMDE031LMB02). The study was carried out according to the ethical guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
Alb Albumin
BMI Body Mass index
BMI Body Mass index
Ca2+ Calcium ions
CRP C-reactive protein
GGT Gamma Glutamate transferase
HDL High density lipoprotein
HDL-c High density lipoprotein cholesterol
LDL Low density Lipoprotein
LDL-c Low density lipoprotein cholesterol
L/WBC% Lymphocyte percentage
Mg2+ Magnesium ions
NO Nitric oxide
OxLDL Oxidized low density lipoprotein
K+ Potassium ions
TSH Thyroid stimulating Hormone
T3 Triiodothyronine
UIC Urinary iodine concentration

References

  1. Ives, C.W., et al., Preeclampsia—Pathophysiology and Clinical Presentations: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2020. 76(14): p. 1690-1702.
  2. Anderson, U.D., et al., Review: Biochemical markers to predict preeclampsia. Placenta, 2012. 33 Suppl: p. S42-7. [CrossRef]
  3. Kornacki, J. and E. Wender-Ożegowska, Utility of biochemical tests in prediction, diagnostics and clinical management of preeclampsia: a review. Archives of Medical Science, 2020. 16(6): p. 1370-1375. [CrossRef]
  4. Chaemsaithong, P., D.S. Sahota, and L.C. Poon, First trimester preeclampsia screening and prediction. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2022. 226(2): p. S1071-S1097.e2. [CrossRef]
  5. Velegrakis, A., et al., Predictive value of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in women with suspected preeclampsia: An update (Review). Int J Mol Med, 2023. 52(4).
  6. Akolekar, R., et al., Maternal plasma soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 and free vascular endothelial growth factor at 11 to 13 weeks of gestation in preeclampsia. Prenat Diagn, 2010. 30(3): p. 191-7. [CrossRef]
  7. Crovetto, F., et al., First trimester screening for early and late preeclampsia based on maternal characteristics, biophysical parameters, and angiogenic factors. Prenat Diagn, 2015. 35(2): p. 183-91. [CrossRef]
  8. Fillion, A., et al., First-Trimester Soluble fms-like Tyrosine Kinase 1 (sFlt-1) for the Prediction of Preterm Preeclampsia. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 2024. 47(2): p. 102753. [CrossRef]
  9. Serra, B., et al., A new model for screening for early-onset preeclampsia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2020. 222(6): p. 608.e1-608.e18. [CrossRef]
  10. Schneuer, F.J., et al., First trimester screening of serum soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 and placental growth factor predicting hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Pregnancy Hypertension: An International Journal of Women’s Cardiovascular Health, 2013. 3(4): p. 215-221. [CrossRef]
  11. Verlohren, S., et al., An automated method for the determination of the sFlt-1/PIGF ratio in the assessment of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2010. 202(2): p. 161.e1-161.e11.
  12. Nikuei, P., et al., Diagnostic accuracy of sFlt1/PlGF ratio as a marker for preeclampsia. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2020. 20(1): p. 80.
  13. Flint, E.J., et al., The role of angiogenic factors in the management of preeclampsia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2019. 98(6): p. 700-707. [CrossRef]
  14. Businge, C., et al., Iodine deficiency in pregnancy as a predictor of Sub-clinical hypothyroidism, preeclampsia and future cardiovascular disease. Asian J Clin Nutr, 2017. 9(3): p. 118-23. [CrossRef]
  15. Longo-Mbenza, B., et al., Diets rich in vegetables and physical activity are associated with a decreased risk of pregnancy induced hypertension among rural women from Kimpese, DR Congo. Niger J Med, 2008. 17(1): p. 45-9.
  16. Businge CB, Longo-Mbenza B, Kengne AP. Serum potassium/magnesium ratio, urinary iodine concentration, thyroid stimulating hormone, fasting plasma glucose, and the oxidized LDL/albumin ratio: potential biomarkers of preeclampsia. Proceedings of the Clinical Research & Biomarkers conference, Prague, Czech Republic, July 19-20, 2018.
  17. Magee, L.A., et al., The 2021 International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy classification, diagnosis & management recommendations for international practice. Pregnancy Hypertens, 2022. 27: p. 148-169. [CrossRef]
  18. Muntner, P., et al., Measurement of Blood Pressure in Humans: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Hypertension, 2019. 73(5): p. e35-e66. [CrossRef]
  19. Ukah, U.V., et al., Prediction of adverse maternal outcomes from pre-eclampsia and other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A systematic review. Pregnancy Hypertension, 2018. 11: p. 115-123. [CrossRef]
  20. Stepan, H., et al., Clinical utility of sFlt-1 and PlGF in screening, prediction, diagnosis and monitoring of pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2023. 61(2): p. 168-180. [CrossRef]
  21. ACOG, Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 222. Obstet Gynecol, 2020. 135(6): p. e237-e260.
  22. Andermann, A., et al., Revisiting Wilson and Jungner in the genomic age: a review of screening criteria over the past 40 years. Bull World Health Organ, 2008. 86(4): p. 317-9. [CrossRef]
  23. Ayuk, J. and N.J. Gittoes, Contemporary view of the clinical relevance of magnesium homeostasis. Ann Clin Biochem, 2014. 51(Pt 2): p. 179-88. [CrossRef]
  24. Institute of Medicine Standing Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference, I., The National Academies Collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health, in Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium, Phosphorus, Magnesium, Vitamin D, and Fluoride. 1997, National Academies Press (US)Copyright © 1997, National Academy of Sciences.: Washington (DC).
  25. Van Laecke, S., Hypomagnesemia and hypermagnesemia. Acta Clin Belg, 2019. 74(1): p. 41-47.
  26. Whang, R. and K.W. Ryder, Frequency of hypomagnesemia and hypermagnesemia. Requested vs routine. Jama, 1990. 263(22): p. 3063-4. [CrossRef]
  27. Maier, J.A., Endothelial cells and magnesium: implications in atherosclerosis. Clin Sci (Lond), 2012. 122(9): p. 397-407. [CrossRef]
  28. Manjareeka, M. and S. Nanda, Serum electrolyte levels in preeclamptic women: A comparative study. International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences, 2012. 3: p. 572-578.
  29. Eslamzadeh, A., et al., Serum Calcium and Magnesium Levels in Women Presenting with Pre-eclampsia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Based on Observational Studies. Galen Med J, 2023. 12: p. 1-19. [CrossRef]
  30. Atiba, A., et al., Serum Magnesium Levels in Second and Third Trimesters of Pregnancy in Patients That Developed Pre-Eclampsia and Feto-Maternal Outcome. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2020. 10: p. 108-117. [CrossRef]
  31. Adekanle, D., et al., Serum magnesium levels in healthy pregnant and pre-eclamptic patients—A cross-section study. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2014. 2014. [CrossRef]
  32. Ephraim, R.K., et al., Serum calcium and magnesium levels in women presenting with pre-eclampsia and pregnancy-induced hypertension: a case-control study in the Cape Coast metropolis, Ghana. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2014. 14: p. 390. [CrossRef]
  33. Tesfa, E., et al., Association of maternal serum magnesium with pre-eclampsia in African pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Health, 2023. 16(1): p. 14-22. [CrossRef]
  34. Kostov, K. and L. Halacheva, Role of Magnesium Deficiency in Promoting Atherosclerosis, Endothelial Dysfunction, and Arterial Stiffening as Risk Factors for Hypertension. Int J Mol Sci, 2018. 19(6). [CrossRef]
  35. AlShanableh, Z. and E.C. Ray, Magnesium in hypertension: mechanisms and clinical implications. Frontiers in Physiology, 2024. 15. [CrossRef]
  36. Sontia, B. and R.M. Touyz, Role of magnesium in hypertension. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 2007. 458(1): p. 33-39.
  37. Ferrè, S., et al., Magnesium deficiency promotes a pro-atherogenic phenotype in cultured human endothelial cells via activation of NFkB. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease, 2010. 1802(11): p. 952-958. [CrossRef]
  38. Rodríguez-Ortiz, M.E., et al., Serum Magnesium is associated with Carotid Atherosclerosis in patients with high cardiovascular risk (CORDIOPREV Study). Scientific Reports, 2019. 9(1): p. 8013. [CrossRef]
  39. Maier, J.A., Low magnesium and atherosclerosis: an evidence-based link. Mol Aspects Med, 2003. 24(1-3): p. 137-46. [CrossRef]
  40. Abel, M.H., et al., Insufficient maternal iodine intake is associated with subfecundity, reduced foetal growth, and adverse pregnancy outcomes in the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study. BMC Medicine, 2020. 18(1): p. 211. [CrossRef]
  41. Cuellar-Rufino, S., et al., Iodine levels are associated with oxidative stress and antioxidant status in pregnant women with hypertensive disease. Nutr Hosp, 2017. 34(3): p. 661-666. [CrossRef]
  42. Gajewska, K., M. Laskowska, and A. Blazewicz, Urinary iodine as an important indicator for preeclampsia: a Polish perspective. Current Issues in Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, 2021. 34(3): p. 154-159. [CrossRef]
  43. Andersson, M., V. Karumbunathan, and M.B. Zimmermann, Global iodine status in 2011 and trends over the past decade. J Nutr, 2012. 142(4): p. 744-50. [CrossRef]
  44. Pearce, E.N., M. Andersson, and M.B. Zimmermann, Global iodine nutrition: Where do we stand in 2013? Thyroid, 2013. 23(5): p. 523-8. [CrossRef]
  45. König, F., et al., Ten repeat collections for urinary iodine from spot samples or 24-hour samples are needed to reliably estimate individual iodine status in women. The Journal of nutrition, 2011. 141(11): p. 2049-2054. [CrossRef]
  46. An, D., et al., Variations in the Urinary Iodine Concentration and Urinary Iodine/Creatinine Ratio among Preschool Children. International Journal of Endocrinology, 2023. 2023(1): p. 6779094. [CrossRef]
  47. Andersson, M., et al., Prevention and control of iodine deficiency in pregnant and lactating women and in children less than 2-years-old: conclusions and recommendations of the Technical Consultation. Public Health Nutr, 2007. 10(12a): p. 1606-11. [CrossRef]
  48. Rasmussen, L.B., L. Ovesen, and E. Christiansen, Day-to-day and within-day variation in urinary iodine excretion. Eur J Clin Nutr, 1999. 53(5): p. 401-7. [CrossRef]
  49. Lazarus, J.H. Thyroid Regulation and Dysfunction in the Pregnant Patient. 2016.
  50. Vidal, Z.E., et al., Oxidative stress increased in pregnant women with iodine deficiency. Biol Trace Elem Res, 2014. 157(3): p. 211-7. [CrossRef]
  51. Redman, C.W. and I.L. Sargent, Placental debris, oxidative stress and pre-eclampsia. Placenta, 2000. 21(7): p. 597-602. [CrossRef]
  52. Winkler, R., Iodine—A Potential Antioxidant and the Role of Iodine/Iodide in Health and Disease. Natural Science, 2015. 07: p. 548-557. [CrossRef]
  53. Winkler, R., S. Griebenow, and W. Wonisch, Effect of iodide on total antioxidant status of human serum. Cell Biochemistry and Function, 2000. 18(2): p. 143-146.
  54. ADA, A.D.A., Management of Diabetes in Pregnancy: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care, 2024. 47(Suppl 1): p. S282-s294.
  55. Wilson, K.L., et al., Subclinical thyroid disease and the incidence of hypertension in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol, 2012. 119(2 Pt 1): p. 315-20. [CrossRef]
  56. Lundgaard, M.H., et al., Maternal hypothyroidism and the risk of preeclampsia: a Danish national and regional study. Maternal Health, Neonatology and Perinatology, 2024. 10(1): p. 16. [CrossRef]
  57. Hajifoghaha, M., et al., Association of thyroid function test abnormalities with preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Endocrine Disorders, 2022. 22(1): p. 240. [CrossRef]
  58. Canzoneri, B.J., et al., Increased neutrophil numbers account for leukocytosis in women with preeclampsia. Am J Perinatol, 2009. 26(10): p. 729-32. [CrossRef]
  59. Kang, Q., et al., Predictive role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in preeclampsia: A meta-analysis including 3982 patients. Pregnancy Hypertension, 2020. 20: p. 111-118.
  60. Tsukimori, K., H. Nakano, and N. Wake, Difference in neutrophil superoxide generation during pregnancy between preeclampsia and essential hypertension. Hypertension, 2007. 49(6): p. 1436-41.
  61. Qiu, C., et al., Oxidized low-density lipoprotein (Oxidized LDL) and the risk of preeclampsia. Physiol Res, 2006. 55(5): p. 491-500. [CrossRef]
  62. León-Reyes, G., et al., Oxidative profiles of LDL and HDL isolated from women with preeclampsia. Lipids in Health and Disease, 2017. 16(1): p. 90. [CrossRef]
  63. Scazzocchio, E., et al., Performance of a first-trimester screening of preeclampsia in a routine care low-risk setting. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2013. 208(3): p. 203.e1-203.e10. [CrossRef]
  64. Poon, L.C., et al., Combined screening for preeclampsia and small for gestational age at 11-13 weeks. Fetal Diagn Ther, 2013. 33(1): p. 16-27. [CrossRef]
Table 1. Median (25th and 75th percentiles) levels of various analytes of cases and controls.
Table 1. Median (25th and 75th percentiles) levels of various analytes of cases and controls.
Cases Controls
Biomarker Median (25p, 75p) Median (25p, 75p) P
HDL –C mg/dL 16.0 (12.0, 29.6) 21.5 (12.0, 45.8) 0.080
LDL –C mg/dL 125.0 (87.0, 154.0) 121.0 (67.0, 134.0) 0.003
Oxidised LDL IU/L 167.0 (89.0, 221.0) 82.0 (19.7, 212) <0.0001
Triglycerides mg/dL 144.5 (84.0, 189.0) 84.0 [67.8, 139.5) <0.0001
Total Cholesterol mg/dL 145.0 (125.0, 199.0) 126.0 (95.3, 145.2) <0.0001
  Waist Circumference cm 79.0 (72.0, 90.0) 75.0 (70.0, 79.0) <0.0001
  Hip circumference cm 98.0 (87.0, 104.0) 92.0 (85, 97.3) 0.001
   BMI Kg/M2 24.6 (20.8, 28.0) 21.8 (19.0, 25.8) <0.0001
     FPG mg/dL 116.0 (99.0, 180.0) 103.0 (89.0, 125.7) <0.0001
  Cortisol nmol/L 32.9 (18.0, 54.0) 18.0 (18.0, 32.0) <0.0001
Vitamin C mg/dL 0.45 (0.21, 2.0) 0.60 (0.22, 5.0) 0.002
  Selenium µg/L 9.0 (9.0, 17.3) 44.0 (21.0, 102.7) <0.0001
UIC µg/L 90.0 (78.0, 157.2) 351.0 (299.0, 555.0) <0.0001
  TSH mIU/L 6.3 (4.1, 8.0) 2.5 (0.13, 4.4) <0.0001
    T3 ng/mL 1.32 (1.16, 1.68) 1.16 (1.0, 1.36) <0.0001
    T4 µg/dL 10.9 (9.3, 12.4) 9.8 (8.4, 11.5) <0.0001
    NO µmo/L 2.0 (1.0, 6.0) 20.9 (4.0, 43.3) <0.0001
Oxid LDL/ Alb ratio 13.0 (9.0, 16.0) 3.6 (2.0, 12) <0.0001
Serum Ferritin ng/mL 213.0 (180.0, 345.0) 199.0 (167.0, 340.0) 0.114
GGT U/L 99.0 (88.0, 113.0) 33.0 (11.0. 99.0) <0.0001
CRP mg/dL 58.5 (39.0, 66.0) 57.0 (12.0, 88.0) 0.024
Lymphocyte % 22.0 (16.0, 25.6) 26.5 (23.5, 38.5) <0.0001
  Serum K+ mmol/L 3.6 (2.8, 6.0) 4.0 (3.8, 4.0) 0.149
  Serum Mg2+ mmol/L 0.12 (0.09, 0.19) 0.97 (0.76, 1.0) <0.0001
  K+/Mg2+ ratio 28.5 (17.3, 44.3) 4.1 (3.7, 5.3) <0.0001
OxLDL/Alb Ratio: Serum Oxidized LDL cholesterol/Albumin ratio; UIC: urine iodine concentration; FPG: Fasting Plasma Glucose; K+/Mg2+: Serum Potassium/Magnesium ratio; TSH: Thyroid stimulating hormone.
Table 2. Analytes that independently predicted the occurrence of preeclampsia in the study population.
Table 2. Analytes that independently predicted the occurrence of preeclampsia in the study population.
Variable B S.E. Wald Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I. Exp(B)
Oxidised LDL/albumin 0.160 0.061 6.99 0.008 1.174 1.042 – 1.32
Lymphocytes -0.282 0.065 19.05 0.000 0.755 0.665 – 0.856
  UIC -0.013 0.003 16.96 0.000 0.987 0.981 – 0.993
  K+/Mg2+ ratio 0.160 0.027 35.83 0.000 1.173 1.113 –1.236
  TSH 0.336 0.132 6.51 0.011 1.400 1.081 –1.812
FPG 0.441 0.003 5.12 0.024 0.993 0.986 – 0.999
Constant 5.61 2.46 5.22 0.022 272.892
OxLDL/Alb Ratio: Serum Oxidised LDL cholesterol/Albumin ratio; UIC: urine iodine concentration; FPG: Fasting Plasma Glucose; K+/Mg2+: Serum Potassium/Magnesium ratio; TSH: Thyroid stimulating hormone.
Table 3. The cut-offs, sensitivity, specificity and areas under the receiver operating curves of various diagnostic biomarkers for the prediction of preeclampsia.
Table 3. The cut-offs, sensitivity, specificity and areas under the receiver operating curves of various diagnostic biomarkers for the prediction of preeclampsia.
Analyte Cut off
Limit
Sensitivity Specificity AUC 95% CI P
K+/Mg2+ >22 93.0 % 95.0% 0.973 0.953 – 0.993 <0.0001
UIC <239 µg/L 98.0 % 80.0% 0.920 0.893 – 0.946 <0.0001
FPG >95mg/dL 81.2% 91.3% 0.860 0.822 – 0.897 <0.0001
TSH >3.9 mIU/L 78.0% 73.0% 0.812 0.771 – 0.854 <0.0001
Lymphocyte % <23.5 72.7 % 63.2 % 0.773 0.729 – 0.818 <0.0001
OxLDL/Alb Ratio >7.0 80.0 % 65.0% 0.746 0.695 – 0.797 <0.0001
Selenium <20 µg/L 79.3% 96.0% 0.885 0.843 – 0.926 <0.0001
Nitric oxide <10 µg/L 60% 94% 0.784 0.730 – 0.837 <0.0001
OxLDL/Alb Ratio: Serum Oxidised LDL cholesterol/Albumin ratio; UIC: urine iodine concentration; FPG: Fasting Plasma Glucose; K+/Mg2+: Serum Potassium/Magnesium ratio; TSH: Thyroid stimulating hormone.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated