Submitted:
24 February 2025
Posted:
24 February 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. The Analysis of Dataset
2.1 Dataset Introduction
2.2. Definition of SOH
2.3. Partial Discharge Profiles
3. Data Augment by DoppelGANger (DG)
3.1. Metadata Generator
3.2. Time Series Generator
3.3. Discriminator
3.4. Normalization Mechanism and Mode Collapse Prevention
4. Estimation of SOH Through Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN)
4.1. Dilated Convolutional Networks
4.2. Causal Convolutional Networks
4.3. Residual Blocks
5. Method and Procedure
5.1. Data Preprocessing
5.2. GAN Enhancement
5.3. Data Split
5.4. TCN Training
5.5. Performance Evaluation
6. Experiment and Analysis
6.1. GAN-Based Synthetic Data Generation and Evaluation
6.2. TCN-Based SOH Estimation Using Partial Discharge Profiles
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- S. Chen, F. Dai, and M. Cai, Opportunities and Challenges of High-Energy Lithium Metal Batteries for Electric Vehicle Applications. ACS Energy Lett. 2020, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 3140–3151. [CrossRef]
- H. Niu et al., Strategies toward the development of high-energy-density lithium batteries. J. Energy Storage, 2024, vol. 88, p. 111666. [CrossRef]
- J. Li, K. Adewuyi, N. Lotfi, R. G. Landers, and J. Park, A single particle model with chemical/mechanical degradation physics for lithium ion battery State of Health (SOH) estimation. Appl. Energy 2018, vol. 212, pp. 1178–1190. [CrossRef]
- Y. Wang et al., A comprehensive review of battery modeling and state estimation approaches for advanced battery management systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev 2020. vol. 131, p. 110015. [CrossRef]
- X. Sun, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhang, L. Wang, and K. Wang, Summary of Health-State Estimation of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy. ENERGIES 2023, vol. 16, no. 15, p. 5682. [CrossRef]
- D. Andre, M. Meiler, K. Steiner, Ch. Wimmer, T. Soczka-Guth, and D. U. Sauer, Characterization of high-power lithium-ion batteries by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. I. Experimental investigation. J. Power Sources 2011, vol. 196, no. 12, pp. 5334–5341. [CrossRef]
- O. Demirci, S. Taskin, E. Schaltz, and B. Acar Demirci, Review of battery state estimation methods for electric vehicles-Part II: SOH estimation. J. Energy Storage 2024, vol. 96, p. 112703. [CrossRef]
- C. Weng, Y. Cui, J. Sun, and H. Peng, On-board state of health monitoring of lithium-ion batteries using incremental capacity analysis with support vector regression. J. Power Sources 2013, vol. 235, pp. 36–44. [CrossRef]
- X. Shu, G. Li, Y. Zhang, J. Shen, Z. Chen, and Y. Liu, Online diagnosis of state of health for lithium-ion batteries based on short-term charging profiles. J. Power Sources 2020, vol. 471, p. 228478. [CrossRef]
- C. Lyu, Q. Lai, T. Ge, H. Yu, L. Wang, and N. Ma, A lead-acid battery’s remaining useful life prediction by using electrochemical model in the Particle Filtering framework. Energy 2017, vol. 120, pp. 975–984. [CrossRef]
- B. Gou, Y. Xu, and X. Feng, State-of-Health Estimation and Remaining-Useful-Life Prediction for Lithium-Ion Battery Using a Hybrid Data-Driven Method. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2020, vol. 69, no. 10, pp. 10854–10867. [CrossRef]
- S. Saxena, C. Hendricks, and M. Pecht, Cycle life testing and modeling of graphite/LiCoO2 cells under different state of charge ranges. J. Power Sources 2016, vol. 327, pp. 394–400. [CrossRef]
- C. Zhao, P. B. Andersen, C. Træholt, and S. Hashemi, Data-driven battery health prognosis with partial-discharge information. J. Energy Storage 2023, vol. 65, p. 107151. [CrossRef]
- S. Bockrath, V. Lorentz, and M. Pruckner, State of health estimation of lithium-ion batteries with a temporal convolutional neural network using partial load profiles. Appl. Energy 2023, vol. 329, p. 120307. [CrossRef]
- J. Li, Y. Liu, and Q. Li, Generative adversarial network and transfer-learning-based fault detection for rotating machinery with imbalanced data condition. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2022, vol. 33, no. 4, p. 045103. [CrossRef]
- A. Shangguan, G. Xie, R. Fei, L. Mu, and X. Hei, Train wheel degradation generation and prediction based on the time series generation adversarial network. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2023, vol. 229, p. 108816. [CrossRef]












| Battery Key Characteristics | Specifications |
| Manufacturer | LG Chem |
| Battery chemistry | Lithium cobalt oxide vs. graphite |
| Nominal capacity | 2.1Ah |
| Lower cut-off voltage | 3.2 V |
| Upper threshold voltage | 4.2 V |
| Group(Cells Id) | Test Conditions |
|
Group 1 (RW1,RW2.RW7,RW8) |
Randomized charging (0.5–3 h) to 4.2 V and discharging to 3.2 V with currents between -0.5 A and -4 A. Reference tests every 50 cycles. |
|
Group 2 (RW3-RW6) |
Non-randomized charging to 4.2 V and discharging to 3.2 V with randomized currents (-0.5 A to -4 A). Reference tests every 50 cycles. |
|
Group 3 (RW9-RW12) |
Charging and discharging with randomized current pulses (30 min–3 h). Discharging currents between -0.5 A and -4 A. Reference tests every 1500 cycles. |
|
Group 4 (RW13-RW16) |
Charging to 4.2 V and discharging to 3.2 V with customized probability distribution (peak at 4 A). Load points are updated every minute. Tests at ~40 °C. Reference tests every 50 cycles. |
|
Group 5 (RW17-RW20) |
Same as Group 4, but the ambient temperature was not strictly controlled (lower than 40 °C). Reference tests every 50 cycles. |
|
Group 6 (RW21-RW24) |
Same as Group 4, but the probability distribution skewed toward lower currents (peak at 2 A). Tests at ~40 °C. Reference tests every 50 cycles. |
|
Group 7 (RW25-RW28) |
Same as Group 6, but the ambient temperature was not strictly controlled (lower than 40 °C). Reference tests every 50 cycles. |
| Use case | SOC ranges | Voltage ranges |
| 1 | 100% to 66.7% | 4.2V to 3.7V |
| 2 | 66.7% to 33.3% | 3.7V to 3.5V |
| 3 | 33.3% to 0% | 3.5V to 3.2V |
| 4 | 100% to 0% | 4.2V to 3.2V |
| Hyperparameters | Values |
| max_sequence_len | 700 |
| sample_len | 500 |
| batch_size | 1000 |
| generator_learning_rate | 1e-4 |
| discriminator_learning_rate | 1e-4 |
| epochs | 5000 |
| Hyperparameters | Values |
| input_size | 1 |
| output_size | 1 |
| kernel_size | 3 |
| dropout | 0.33 |
| Dilation | [1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64] |
| earning_rate | 0.001 |
| epochs | 5000 |
| Group | Raw data | Raw+ Synthetic data | ||
| MAPE | RMSE | MAPE | RMSE | |
| 1 | 8.2710% | 0.0749 | 11.9831% | 0.1121 |
| 2 | 6.9889% | 0.0624 | 8.8346% | 0.0772 |
| 3 | 11.0467% | 0.0745 | 10.0822% | 0.0684 |
| 4 | 12.2142% | 0.0936 | 7.1604% | 0.0571 |
| 5 | 15.2889% | 0.1065 | 9.8016% | 0.0741 |
| 6 | 8.8731% | 0.0825 | 3.2651% | 0.0359 |
| 7 | 9.1879% | 0.0819 | 3.6310% | 0.0409 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).