Submitted:
11 February 2025
Posted:
11 February 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Results
2.1. Chemical properties of OMW
2.2. Effects of various concentrations of OMW on V. dahliae in-vitro
2.3. Suppression of verticillium wilt of eggplant in experiment I
2.4. Suppression of verticillium wilt of eggplant in experiment II
2.5. Suppression of verticillium wilt of tomato in experiment III
2.6. Suppression of verticillium wilt of eggplant in experiment IV
2.7. Suppression of verticillium wilt of eggplant in experiment V
2.8. Suppressive effect of OMW against V. dahliae over time
2.9. Analysis of the bacterial microbial diversity of the tomato and eggplant plants
2.10. Analysis of the fungal microbial diversity of the tomato and eggplant plants
3. Discussion
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Determination of mineral nutrients and phenolic content in olive mill wastewater
4.2. In-vitro evaluation of olive mill wastewater against V. dahliae
4.3. Plant material
4.4. Optimal dosage of OMW application
4.5. OMW, fungal strains and V. dahliae preparation for pathogenicity assays
4.6. In-planta bioassays
4.7. Disease assessment
4.8. Plant growth
4.9. Isolation of fungal strains from disease suppressive soil and asymptomatic plants
4.10. Verticillium dahliae re-isolation
4.11. DNA extraction
4.12. Verticillium dahliae qPCR quantification
4.13. Statistics
4.14. Analysis of the microbial community composition of the eggplant and tomato plants
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| OMW | Olive Mill Wastewater |
| GR | Growth Rate |
| MA | Microsclerotial Area |
| SG | Spore Germination |
| MG | Microsclerotium Germination |
| ASV | Amplicon Sequence Variants |
| NGS | Next Generation Sequencing |
| CCA | Canonical Correspondence Analysis |
| RDA | Redundancy Analysis |
| DCA | Detrended Correspondence Analysis |
| PERMANOVA | Permutational Analysis of Variance |
References
- Pegg, G.F.; Brady, B.L. Verticillium Wilts; CABI Publishing: Wallingford, Oxfordshire, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Fradin, E.F.; Thomma, B.P.H.J. Physiology and molecular aspects of Verticillium wilt diseases caused by V. dahliae and V. albo-atrum. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2006, 7, 71–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Agrios, G. Plant pathology, 5th ed.; Elsevier Academic Press: New York, 2005; pp. 539–540. [Google Scholar]
- El-Abbassi, A.; Saadaoui, N.; Kiai, H.; Raiti, J.; Hafidi, A. Potential applications of olive mill wastewater as biopesticide for crops protection. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 576, 10–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alfano, G.; Lustrato, G.; Lima, G.; Vitullo, D.; Ranalli, G. Characterization of composted olive mill wastes to predict potential plant disease suppressiveness. Biol. Control 2011, 58, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Markakis, E.A.; Tjamos, S.E.; Chatzipavlidis, I.; Antoniou, P.P.; Paplomatas, E.J. Evaluation of compost amendments for control of vascular wilt diseases. J. Phytopathol. 2008, 156, 622–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Markakis, E.A.; Fountoulakis, M.S.; Daskalakis, G.C.; Kokkinis, M.; Ligoxigakis, E.K. The suppressive effect of compost amendments on Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. radicis-cucumerinum in cucumber and Verticillium dahliae in eggplant. Crop Prot. 2016, 79, 70–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papasotiriou, F.G.; Varypatakis, K.G.; Christofi, N.; Tjamos, S.E.; Paplomatas, E.J. Olive mill wastes: A source of resistance for plants against Verticillium dahliae and a reservoir of biocontrol agents. Biol. Control 2013, 67, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yangui, T.; Sayadi, S.; Gargoubi, A.; Dhouib, A. Fungicidal effect of hydroxytyrosol-rich preparations from olive mill wastewater against Verticillium dahliae. Crop Prot. 2010, 29, 1208–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karpouzas, D.G.; Ntougias, S.; Iskidou, E.; Rousidou, C.; Papadopoulou, K.K.; Zervakis, G.I.; Ehaliotis, C. Olive mill wastewater affects the structure of soil bacterial communities. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2010, 45, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Regni, L.; Pezzolla, D.; Ciancaleoni, S.; Marozzi, G.; Albertini, E.; Gigliotti, G.; Proietti, P. Long-term effects of amendment with olive mill wastewater on soil chemical properties, microbial community, and olive tree vegetative and productive activities. Agron. 2021, 11, 2562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ben-Sassi, A.; Ouazzani, N.; Walker, G.M.; Ibnsouda, S.; El-Mzibri, M.; Boussaid, A. Detoxification of olive mill wastewaters by Moroccan yeast isolates. Biodegradation 2008, 19, 337–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bleve, G.; Lezzi, C.; Chiriatti, M.A.; D' Ostuni, I.; Tristezza, M.; Venere, D.D.; Sergio, L.; Mita, G.; Grieco, F. Selection of non-conventional yeasts and their use in immobilized form for the bioremediation of olive oil mill wastewaters. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 982–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ntougias, S.; Bourtzis, K.; Tsiamis, G. Themicrobiology of olive mill wastes. Biomed. Res. Int. 2013, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Baidez, A.G.; Gomez, P.; Del Rio, J.A.; Ortuno, A. Dysfunctionality of the xylem in Olea europaea L. plants associated with the infection process by Verticillium dahliae Kleb. role of phenolic compounds in plant defense mechanism. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 3373–3377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Drais, M.I.; Pannucci, E.; Caracciolo, R.; Bernini, R.; Romani, A.; Santi, L.; Varvaro, L. Antifungal activity of hydroxytyrosol enriched extracts from olive mill waste against Verticillium dahliae, the cause of Verticillium wilt of olive. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2021, 60, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jarboui, R.; Azab, S.M.; Bilel, H.; Moustafa, M.N.S. Antifungal effect of fresh and stored olive mill wastewater and its ethyl acetate extract against plant pathogenic fungi. Plant Protect. Sci. 2024, 60, 65–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yangui, T.; Dhouib, A.; Rhouma, A.; Sayadi, S. Potential of hydroxytyrosol-rich composition from olive mill wastewater as a natural disinfectant and its effect on seeds vigour response. Food Chem. 2009, 117, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aviles, M.; Borrero, C. Identifying characteristics of verticillium wilt suppressiveness in olive mill composts. Plant Dis 2017, 101, 1568–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leontopoulos, S.; Skenderidis, P.; Vagelas, K.I. Potential use of polyphenolic compounds obtained from olive mill waste waters on plant pathogens and plant parasitic nematodes. In Plant Defence: Biological Control, 2nd ed.; Merillon, J.M., Ramawat, K.G., Eds.; Springer Nature: Switzerland AG, 2020; Volume 22, pp. 137–177. [Google Scholar]
- Feki, M.; Allouche, N.; Bouaziz, M.; Gargoubi, A.; Sayadi, S. Effect of storage of olive mill wastewaters on hydroxytyrosol concentration. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2006, 108, 1021–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tardioli, S.; Bànnè, E.T.G.; Santori, F. Species-specific selection on soil fungal population after olive mill waste-water treatment. Chemosphere 1997, 34, 2329–2336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Snelders, N.C.; Boshoven, J.C.; Song, Y.; Schmitz, N.; Fiorin, G.L.; Rovenich, H.; Van den Berg, G.C.M.; Torres, D.E.; Petti, G.C.; Prockl, Z.; Faino, L.; Seidl, M.F.; Thomma, B.P.H.J. A highly polymorphic effector protein promotes fungal virulence through suppression of plant-associated Actinobacteria. New Phytol. 2023, 237, 944–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bekris, F.; Vasileiadis, S.; Papadopoulou, E.; Samaras, A.; Testempasis, S.; Gkizi, D.; Tavlaki, G.; Tzima, A.; Paplomatas, E.; Markakis, E.A.; Karaoglanidis, G.; Papadopoulou, K.K.; Karpouzas, G.D. Grapevine wood microbiome analysis identifies key fungal pathogens and potential interactions with the bacterial community implicated in grapevine trunk disease appearance. Environ. microbiome 2021, 16, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Si, B.; Wang, H.; Bai, J.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, Y. Evaluating the Utility of Simplicillium lanosoniveum, a Hyperparasitic Fungus of Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici, as a Biological Control Agent against Wheat Stem Rust. Pathogens 2022, 12, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, N.; Zhang, W.; Wang, D.; Cao, D.; Cao, Y.; He, W.; Lin, Z.; Chen, X.; Ye, G.; Chen, Z.; Chen, J.; Wei, X. A novel endophytic fungus strain of Cladosporium: its identification, genomic analysis, and effects on plant growth. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1287582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gaines, T.P.; Mitchell, G.A. Chemical methods for soil and plant analysis; Agronomy handbook no. 1; University of Georgia, Coastal Plain Experiment Station, 1979; pp. 18–21. [Google Scholar]
- Markakis, E.A.; Roditakis, E.N.; Kalantzakis, G.S.; Chatzaki, A.; Soultatos, S.K.; Stavrakaki, M.; Tavlaki, G.I.; Koubouris, G.C.; Bagkis, N.; Goumas, D.E. Characterization of fungi associated with olive fruit rot and olive oil degradation in Crete, southern Greece. Plant Dis. 2021, 105, 3623–3635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Markakis, E.A.; Ligoxigakis, E.K.; Avramidou, E.V.; Tzanidakis, N. Survival, persistence and infection efficiency of Verticillium dahliae passed through the digestive system of sheep. Plant Dis. 2014, 98, 1235–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Markakis, E.A.; Krasagakis, N.; Tzortzakakis, E.A.; Tsaniklidis, G.; Lagogianni, C.S.; Ligoxigakis, E.K.; Pardavella, I.V.; Goumas, D.E. Investigation of interactions between Meloidogyne javanica and three soil-borne fungi against susceptible plant hosts. J. Phytopathol. 2021, 169, 98–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campbell, C.L.; Madden, L.V. Introduction to plant disease epidemiology; Wiley-InterscienceWiley: New York, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Murray, M. G.; Thompson, W. F. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980, 8, 4321–4326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Markakis, E.A.; Tjamos, S.E.; Antoniou, P.P.; Paplomatas, E.J.; Tjamos, E.C. Phenolic responses of resistant and susceptible olive cultivars induced by defoliating and nondefoliating Verticillium dahliae pathotypes. Plant Dis. 2010, 94, 1156–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, A.; Hu, J.; Sun, S.; Xu, G. Conservation and divergence of both phosphate- and mycorrhiza-regulated physiological responses and expression patterns of phosphate transporters in solanaceous species. New Phytol. 2007, 173, 817–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Livak, K. J.; Schmittgen, T. D. Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vasileiadis, S.; Puglisi, E.; Papadopoulou, E.S.; Pertile, G.; Suciu, N.; Pappolla, R.A.; Tourna, M.; Karas, P.A.; Papadimitriou, F.; Kasiotakis, A.; Ipsilanti, N.; Ferrarini, A.; Sułowicz, S.; Fornasier, F.; Menkissoglu-Spiroudi, U.; Nicol, G.W.; Trevisan, M.; Karpouzas, D. G. Blame it on the metabolite: 3,5-dichloraniline rather than the parent compound is responsible for decreasing diversity and function of soil microorganisms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, e01536–01518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walters, W.; Hyde, E.R.; Berg-Lyons, D.; Ackermann, G.; Humphrey, G.; Parada, A.; Gilbert, J.A.; Jansson, J.K.; Caporaso, J.G.; Fuhrman, J.A.; Apprill, A.; Knight, R. Improved Bacterial 16S rRNA Gene (V4 and V4-5) and Fungal Internal Transcribed Spacer Marker Gene Primers for Microbial Community Surveys. mSystems 2016, 1, e00009-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ihrmark, K.; Bödeker, I.T.M.; Cruz-Martinez, K.; Friberg, H.; Kubartova, A.; Schenck, J.; Strid, Y.; Stenlid, J.; Brandström-Durling, M.; Clemmensen, K.E.; Lindahl, B.D. New primers to amplify the fungal ITS2 region – evaluation by 454-sequencing of artificial and natural communities. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2012, 82, 666–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dodt, M.; Roehr, J.T.; Ahmed, R.; Dieterich, C. FLEXBAR—Flexible Barcode and Adapter Processing for Next-Generation Sequencing Platforms. Biol. 2012, 1, 895–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Callahan, B.J.; McMurdie, P.J.; Rosen, M.J.; Han, A.W.; Johnson, A.J.A.; Holmes, S.P. DADA2: High resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 2016, 13, 581–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mclaren, M.R. Silva SSU Taxonomic Training Data Formatted for DADA2 (Silva Version 138). 2020. Available online: https://zenodo.org/record/3986799 (accessed on 18 October 2024).
- Abarenkov, K.; Zirk, A.; Piirmann, T.; Pöhönen; R.; Ivanov; F.; Nilsson; R.H.; Kõljalg; U. 2020. UNITE general FASTA release for Fungi.
- McMurdie, P.J.; Holmes, S. Phyloseq: AnR Package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e61217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marcon, E.; Hérault, B. Entropart: An R Package to Measure and Partition Diversity. J. Stat. Softw. 2015, 67, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Mendiburu, F.; Agricolae: Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. R Package Version 1.3-5 2021. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/agricolae/index.html (accessed on 18 October 2024).
- Ter Braak, C.J.F.; Verdonschot, P.F.M. Canonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. Aquat. Sci. 1995, 57, 255–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Israels, A.Z. Redundancy analysis for qualitative variables. Psychometrika 1984, 49, 331–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lepš, J.; Šmilauer, P. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data using CANOCO; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Anderson, M.J. Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance (PERMANOVA). In Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online; 2017; pp. 1–15. [Google Scholar]
- Arbizu, P.M. 2020. pairwiseAdonis. Available online: https://github.com/pmartinezarbizu/pairwiseAdonis (accessed on 18 October 2024).





| Treatment | Fungal parametersa | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Growth rate (mm/day)b | Spores (×105) per 5-mm-diameter discc | Hyphae width (μm)d | Microsclerotial area (cm2)e | Spore germination (%)f | Microsclerotium germination (%)g | |
| V. d. + 0.00% OMW | 3.84±0.18 a | 27.92±7.87 ab | 3.35±0.13 a | 12.72±2.09 a | 63.66±4.28 a | 37.03±4.97 a |
| V. d. + 0.01% OMW | 3.46±0.22 ab | 21.08±2.16 abcd | 2.58±0.13 b | 8.39±2.31 a | 59.03±2.70 ab | 26.88±5.92 ab |
| V. d. + 0.05% OMW | 3.24±0.23 abc | 38.00±5.18 a | 2.17±0.11 bc | 7.67±2.31 a | 56.01±4.22 abc | 23.14±5.37 ab |
| V. d. + 0.10% OMW | 3.11±0.21 abc | 25.42±4.97 abc | 1.78±0.08 cd | 4.93±1.70 a | 50.23±2.20 abc | 28.19±3.60 ab |
| V. d. + 0.25% OMW | 2.95±0.24 bc | 11.83±2.07 bcd | 2.02±0.09 cd | 5.59±1.98 a | 54.40±3.80 abc | 24.56±3.96 ab |
| V. d. + 0.50% OMW | 2.66±0.10 bc | 10.25±1.25 cd | 1.86±0.08 cd | 5.14±1.28 a | 47.92±2.50 bc | 20.52±4.47 abc |
| V. d. + 1.00% OMW | 2.61±0.12 c | 8.92±0.97 cd | 1.72±0.08 d | 5.09±1.28 a | 43.98±2.82 c | 10.94±5.11 bc |
| V. d. + 5.00% OMW | 2.45±0.08 c | 6.17±0.95 d | 2.07±0.11 cd | 7.93±0.38 a | 0.00±0.00 d | 5.89±2.82 c |
| Treatment | Disease parametersa | Plant growth parametersb | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DI (%) | FDS (%) | M (%) | RAUDPC (%) | IR (0-1) | L | H (cm) | FW (gr) | |
| Control- | 0.00±0.00 c | 0.00±0.00 c | 0.00±0.00 b | 0.00±0.00 c | 0.00±0.00 c | 6.76±0.14 a | 18.31±0.34 a | 6.56±0.17 a |
| V.d. high | 90.48±6.15 a | 68.49±5.43 a | 47.62±9.91 a | 26.76±2.95 a | 0.59±0.08 a | 6.24±0.14 ab | 17.00±0.39 ab | 2.89±0.31 b |
| V.d. low | 52.38±6.14 b | 34.27±7.91 b | 9.52±6.15 b | 6.80±2.01 bc | 0.29±0.14 b | 6.52±0.13 ab | 18.29±0.39 a | 6.19±0.49 a |
| V.d. high+OMW | 14.29±14.29 c | 4.06±2.36 c | 0.00±0.00 b | 0.25±0.15 c | 0.10±0.06 bc | 6.25±0.14 ab | 16.75±0.34 ab | 6.47±0.37 a |
| V.d. low+OMW | 4.76±4.76 c | 1.90±1.90 c | 0.00±0.00 b | 0.66±0.66 c | 0.13±0.07 bc | 6.05±0.13 b | 17.71±0.48 ab | 5.96±0.37 a |
| V.d. high+TRIANUM-P | 52.38±6.74 b | 33.45±7.44 b | 4.76±4.76 b | 7.88±1.94 b | 0.25±0.16 bc | 6.48±0.11 ab | 16.14±0.56 b | 5.87±0.42 a |
| Treatment | Disease parametersa | Plant growth parametersb | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DI (%) | FDS (%) | M (%) | RAUDPC (%) | IR (0-1) | qPCR | L | H (cm) | FW (gr) | |
| Control- | 0.00±0.00 e | 0.00±0.00 c | 0.00±0.00 b | 0.00±0.00 e | 0.00±0.00 d | 0.00±0.00 b | 7.10±0.41 a | 15.22±0.84 ab | 7.73±0.47 a |
| V.d. high | 100.00±0.00 a | 75.22±1.57 a | 33.33±10.29 ab | 38.40±1.48 a | 0.98±0.02 a | 3.90±1.10 a | 6.95±0.26 a | 11.57±0.37 c | 2.53±0.16 c |
| V.d. low | 85.72±6.73 ab | 66.81±5.06 a | 23.81±14.02 ab | 29.63±3.28 ab | 0.84±0.06 a | ne | 7.05±0.29 a | 13.21±0.48 bc | 4.24±0.55 bc |
| V.d. high+OMW | 42.86±14.02 c | 32.91±7.73 b | 9.52±6.15 ab | 12.84±3.37 cd | 0.37±0.09 c | 1.12±0.35 b | 6.90±0.15 a | 15.12±0.62 ab | 6.26±0.62 ab |
| V.d. high_Steril. soil+OMW | 57.14±15.79 bc | 35.96±7.20 b | 0.00±0.00 b | 10.23±2.74 de | 0.49±0.10 bc | ne | 7.10±0.23 a | 16.74±0.65 a | 6.27±0.53 ab |
| V.d. low+OMW | 42.86±11.98 c | 28.34±7.55 b | 14.28±6.73 ab | 8.20±2.78 de | 0.30±0.09 cd | ne | 6.90±0.15 a | 15.14±0.57 ab | 6.12±0.61 ab |
| V.d. high+KX1 | 100.00±0.00 a | 72.80±1.16 a | 19.05±9.91 ab | 30.81±1.92 ab | ne | ne | 6.62±0.15 a | 12.21±0.41 c | 2.78±0.28 c |
| V.d. high+KX2 | 90.48±6.15 ab | 69.54±5.30 a | 52.38±12.30 a | 30.29±3.09 ab | ne | ne | 6.62±0.33 a | 13.38±0.31 bc | 3.00±0.45 c |
| V.d. high+KX3 | 100.00±0.00 a | 70.68±2.40 a | 23.81±9.52 ab | 31.78±2.17 ab | ne | ne | 7.10±0.28 a | 13.00±0.43 bc | 3.29±0.25 c |
| V.d. high+KX6 | 100.00±0.00 a | 76.15±1.35 a | 42.86±9.52 ab | 33.15±1.57 ab | ne | ne | 6.48±0.13 a | 12.81±0.41 bc | 2.52±0.14 c |
| V.d. high+KX7 | 100.00±0.00 a | 75.28±2.32 a | 42.86±9.52 ab | 32.19±2.08 ab | ne | ne | 6.52±0.11 a | 12.17±0.27 bcd | 2.80±0.27 c |
| V.d. high+KF8 | 95.24±4.76 ab | 70.16±3.37 a | 33.33±10.29 ab | 26.55±2.60 ab | ne | ne | 6.71±0.18 a | 14.05±0.59 bcd | 3.74±0.45 c |
| V.d. high+MIXED | 85.71±9.91 ab | 63.32±6.26 a | 23.76±9.52 ab | 28.28±3.53 ab | ne | ne | 6.62±0.41 a | 12.26±0.54 c | 3.48±0.51 c |
| V.d. high+TRIANUM-P | 80.95±9.91 abc | 61.58±7.00 a | 37.95±13.48 ab | 22.91±3.37 bc | 0.76±0.08 ab | 0.56±0.09 b | 6.57±0.44 a | 12.67±0.69 bc | 3.76±0.59 c |
| Treatment | Disease parametersa | Plant growth parametersb | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DI (%) | FDS (%) | M (%) | RAUDPC (%) | IR (0-1) | qPCR | L | H (cm) | FW (gr) | |
| Control- | 0.00±0.00 c | 0.00±0.00 c | 0.00±0.00 a | 0.00±0.00 c | 0.00±0.00 c | 0.002±0.001 c | 7.71±0.10 a | 38.39±0.78 a | 11.26±0.34 a |
| V.d. | 95.27±4.76 a | 42.76±1.89 a | 0.00±0.00 a | 25.14±1.43 a | 0.62±0.07 a | 0.182±0.026 a | 7.67±0.13 a | 34.74±0.83 b | 8.98±0.23 c |
| V.d.+OMW | 52.38±9.91 b | 22.36±4.87 b | 0.00±0.00 a | 11.54±2.62 b | 0.38±0.09 b | 0.097±0.021 b | 7.50±0.11 a | 36.13±0.75 ab | 10.21±0.37 b |
| Treatment | Disease parametersa | Plant growth parametersb | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DI (%) | FDS (%) | M (%) | RAUDPC (%) | IR (0-1) | L | H (cm) | FW (gr) | ||
| Control- | 0.00±0.00 c | 0.00±0.00 c | 0.00±0.00 b | 0.00±0.00 c | 0.00±0.00 b | 7.57±0.22 ab | 17.79±0.72 a | 10.67±0.54 a | |
| V.d. | 100.00±0.00 a | 79.91±1.64 a | 57.14±14.02 a | 37.24±1.39 a | 0.78±0.06 a | 6.62±0.22 b | 13.67±0.52 b | 2.93±0.18 c | |
| V.d.+OMW | 80.95±6.73 ab | 56.78±6.51 b | 23.81±6.15 ab | 23.72±3.03 b | 0.48±0.11 ab | 6.95±0.30 ab | 16.31±0.68 a | 5.01±0.71 bc | |
| V.d.+Steril.OMW | 76.19±9.52 b | 53.32±7.08 b | 14.28±6.73 b | 21.77±3.12 b | 0.63±0.09 a | 7.29±0.27 ab | 15.83±0.65 ab | 5.50±0.75 bc | |
| V.d./- | 85.72±6.73 ab | 58.54±6.50 ab | 14.28±6.73 b | 28.15±4.05 ab | 0.70±0.10 a | 7.57±0.21 ab | 18.05±0.60 a | 8.48±1.43 ab | |
| V.d./OMW | 85.72±6.73 ab | 62.13±5.83 ab | 14.29±9.91 b | 28.71±3.11 ab | 0.74±0.09 a | 7.71±0.23 a | 16.86±0.70 a | 7.60±1.25 ab | |
| Treatment | Disease parametersa | Plant growth parametersb | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DI (%) | FDS (%) | M (%) | RAUDPC (%) | IR (0-1) | L | H (cm) | FW (gr) | ||
| Control- | 0.00±0.00 b | 0.00±0.00 b | 0.00±0.00 a | 0.00±0.00 b | 0.00±0.00 b | 7.29±0.22 a | 15.65±0.40 a | 7.87±0.32 a | |
| V.d. | 100.00±0.00 a | 70.35±1.97 a | 28.57±11.34 a | 41.37±1.71 a | 0.92±0.04 a | 6.19±0.15 b | 11.86±0.36 b | 2.46±0.26 b | |
| V.d.+OMW | 100.00±0.00 a | 70.16±1.41 a | 19.05±9.91 a | 36.62±1.49 b | 0.86±0.06 a | 6.19±0.13 b | 11.79±0.27 b | 2.26±0.11 b | |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).