Navigating Ontological Insecurity: Ideological Instability and Identity Confusion in Bangladesh

Monnappa K C

doi:10.20944/preprints202501.2253.v1

Submitted:

29 January 2025

Posted:

30 January 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract

Navigating Ontological Insecurity: Ideological Instability and Identity Confusion in Bangladesh Abstract The article delves into the ontological insecurity permeating Bangladesh, elucidating how its fluctuating ideological orientations and identity ambiguities have perpetuated national instability. By tracing the historical trajectory — from British India to East Bengal, then East Pakistan, and ultimately Bangladesh — this analysis reveals the deep-seated roots of the country’s identity crisis. The study employs a sociological lens to understand how ideological oscillations between secularism and Islamization, compounded by varying governance models, have exacerbated social fragmentation and weakened national coherence. Theoretical constructs from political science, particularly the concepts of ontological security and identity politics, are used to interpret the persistent instability in Bangladesh. The article underscores the detrimental effects of these ideological vacillations on social cohesion, manifesting in heightened sectarian tensions and a fragmented national identity. It further explores how policy instability, driven by inconsistent governance and fluctuating ideological frameworks, impedes economic development by deterring investment and diverting focus from essential reforms. Through an examination of key historical events and their socio-political repercussions, such as the impact of the partition of India and the subsequent rise of political Islam, the article highlights the tangible consequences of ontological insecurity on Bangladesh’s political and socio-economic landscape. The discussion emphasizes the imperative for a stable framework to address these issues. This includes reconciling historical and cultural elements, establishing inclusive governance structures, and fostering a cohesive national identity. By integrating insights from both sociological and political science perspectives, the article advocates for a comprehensive approach to mitigate the effects of ontological insecurity, aiming to guide Bangladesh towards a more stable and prosperous future.

Keywords:

Ontological Security

;

Bangladesh

;

Identity Politics

;

Ideological Instability

Subject:

Social Sciences - Political Science

Introduction

Bangladesh’s history, from its inception to the present day, is a narrative of profound and often conflicting identity crises, which have shaped its political, social, and economic trajectories. This paper delves into how the failure to achieve ontological security — a stable and coherent sense of national identity — has perpetuated instability within the country. Ontological security refers to a nation's sense of stability and continuity, both in its self-conception and its interactions with the world (Giddens, 1991; Mitzen, 2006). For Bangladesh, the struggle to reconcile secularism, Islamization, democracy, and dictatorship has been central to its ongoing crisis, hindering its development and fostering a pervasive sense of existential insecurity (Chowdhury, 2018). The roots of Bangladesh's identity crisis can be traced back to the tumultuous period leading up to its independence in 1971. The region, initially part of British India, experienced significant political and social shifts that contributed to its eventual separation and the formation of East Pakistan. The partition of India in 1947, which created the independent nations of India and Pakistan, also carved out East Bengal as East Pakistan (Jahan, 1972). This region's distinct linguistic, cultural, and religious identity set it apart from West Pakistan, leading to deep-seated tensions and a growing sense of disenfranchisement among Bengalis (Rahman, 2014).

The movement for independence was fuelled by a combination of political, economic, and cultural grievances. East Bengal's population, primarily Bengali-speaking Muslims, felt marginalized by the ruling authorities in West Pakistan, who were culturally and linguistically distinct. The lack of political representation, coupled with economic neglect, intensified demands for autonomy, ultimately culminating in the Bangladesh Liberation War and the creation of Bangladesh in 1971 (Mascarenhas, 1986; Raghavan, 2013). The new nation faced the monumental task of establishing a cohesive identity amidst its diverse and often conflicting internal elements (Jalal, 2014). From the outset, Bangladesh grappled with the challenge of defining its national identity.

The initial post-independence period was marked by an attempt to forge a democratic governance model that could encompass the country’s diverse cultural and religious landscape (Riaz, 2016). However, the political environment soon became polarized, leading to periods of authoritarian rule under military regimes (Sikder, 2017). The oscillation between democratic and dictatorial governance models created a fragmented sense of identity and stability, complicating efforts to establish a unified national narrative. The tension between secularism and Islamization has been particularly pronounced. The country's constitution, initially designed to reflect secular values, faced numerous challenges as political forces vied for influence (Kabir, 2019). The rise of Islamist political movements introduced a new dimension to the national identity crisis, further complicating the balance between secularism and religious values (Hashmi, 2000). The successive governments' varying approaches to these ideological conflicts have only exacerbated the sense of ontological insecurity.

Moreover, the struggle to integrate these diverse elements into a coherent national identity has had significant implications for Bangladesh’s social cohesion and economic development. The ideological vacillations between secularism, Islamization, democracy, and dictatorship have undermined the stability required for sustainable development and social harmony (Lewis, 2011). The failure to achieve a stable ontological security has led to frequent political turmoil, economic challenges, and a persistent sense of existential uncertainty among the populace (Hossain, 2018). In examining Bangladesh’s historical and political conditions, it becomes evident that the country's identity struggles are deeply intertwined with its ontological insecurity. The ongoing crisis reflects the challenges of reconciling a complex array of ideological, cultural, and political elements into a unified and stable national identity. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for addressing the root causes of instability and fostering a more coherent and secure future for Bangladesh (Siddiqi, 2015).

Historical Roots and Partition of India

The socio-political landscape of the Indian subcontinent before the partition of India was characterized by a complex interplay of colonial legacies, religious identities, and regional aspirations. The partition of India in 1947, which led to the creation of Pakistan and later Bangladesh, was a watershed moment that reshaped the region’s political and social dynamics (Talbot & Singh, 2009). Understanding the historical roots and the subsequent evolution of East Bengal into East Pakistan — and eventually into Bangladesh — requires an exploration of the colonial influences, regional identities, and the impact of post-colonial policies (Jalal, 1995).

Overview of the Socio-Political Conditions Before the Partition of India: Prior to the partition, British India was a vast and diverse entity, home to numerous ethnic, religious, and linguistic groups. The British colonial rule, established through a combination of military conquest and political maneuvering, exacerbated these divisions by implementing administrative and political policies that often favored certain groups over others (Metcalf & Metcalf, 2006). This led to a fragmented socio-political landscape, where regional identities and aspirations increasingly came to the fore. In Bengal, the situation was particularly complex. The region was characterized by a significant Muslim majority in East Bengal (present-day Bangladesh) and a Hindu majority in West Bengal (present-day West Bengal, India) (Chatterji, 1994). The cultural and linguistic differences between the Bengali-speaking population in the east and the Urdu-speaking population in the west created a distinct regional identity that was often overshadowed by broader national narratives. The British administration’s strategy of “divide and rule” further deepened these divisions, as it manipulated communal tensions to maintain control over the subcontinent (Brown, 1994).

The socio-economic conditions in Bengal also played a crucial role in shaping regional sentiments. The Bengal province was one of the most economically developed regions under British rule, but it also faced significant socio-economic disparities (Sarkar, 1989). The economic benefits of colonial rule were unevenly distributed, leading to widespread poverty and disenfranchisement among the Bengali-speaking population in the eastern part of the province (Joya, 2013). This economic disparity, coupled with the political neglect of East Bengal, fuelled dissatisfaction and a sense of marginalization among its people (Bose, 2009).

Factors Leading to the Creation of East Bengal and Its Subsequent Evolution into East Pakistan: The demand for a separate Muslim state began gaining momentum in the early 20th century, driven by a combination of political, economic, and cultural factors. The All India Muslim League, under the leadership of Mohammad Ali Jinnah, advocated for the creation of a separate state for Muslims, arguing that their cultural and religious identity was distinct from that of the Hindu majority (Jinnah, 1947; Jalal, 1985). This demand was rooted in the perceived failure of the Indian National Congress to address Muslim concerns and the belief that Muslims needed a separate political entity to safeguard their interests. The partition of India in 1947, which resulted in the creation of India and Pakistan, was a direct outcome of these demands. The new nation of Pakistan was envisioned as a homeland for Muslims, comprising two geographically separated regions: West Pakistan (present-day Pakistan) and East Pakistan (present-day Bangladesh) (Raghavan, 2013). The creation of East Pakistan was intended to address the aspirations of Bengali Muslims, who sought greater political and cultural autonomy (Sheikh, 2009).

However, the merger of East Bengal into Pakistan did not fully address the regional aspirations of the Bengali-speaking population. The political and administrative power was concentrated in West Pakistan, leaving East Pakistan marginalized and underrepresented (Riaz, 2016). The economic policies of the new Pakistani government further exacerbated these disparities, as resources and political influence were skewed in favor of the western part of the country (Sisson & Rose, 1991). The dissatisfaction in East Pakistan grew over time, fueled by the perceived neglect and exploitation by the central government in West Pakistan. This discontentment culminated in the Bangladesh Liberation War of 1971, which led to the creation of Bangladesh as an independent nation (Bass, 2013). The liberation movement was driven by a desire to assert Bengali identity and autonomy, and it reflected the deep-seated grievances against the central government’s failure to address regional aspirations (Jalal, 1995).

The Impact of Colonial and Post-Colonial Policies on Regional Identity: The legacy of British colonial policies had a lasting impact on the regional identities and political dynamics of the Indian subcontinent. The administrative boundaries drawn by the British, along with their policies of preferential treatment and divide-and-rule tactics, laid the groundwork for the communal and regional tensions that emerged during and after the partition (Chatterji, 1994). Post-colonial policies also played a significant role in shaping regional identities and political outcomes. The transition from colonial rule to independence brought with it a host of challenges, including the task of redefining national and regional identities in a newly independent state (Talbot, 2016). In Pakistan, the initial focus was on consolidating the new nation and addressing the political and administrative challenges of integrating diverse regions. However, the neglect of East Pakistan’s aspirations and the failure to address its socio-economic grievances contributed to the growing sense of disenfranchisement and alienation (Raghavan, 2013).

The subsequent evolution of East Pakistan into Bangladesh was marked by a series of political and social transformations. The struggle for autonomy and independence was driven by a desire to assert a distinct Bengali identity and to rectify the historical injustices faced under both colonial and post-colonial rule (Riaz, 2016). The creation of Bangladesh represented a culmination of these aspirations and a quest for a national identity that could reconcile the diverse elements of its cultural and political heritage (Sheikh, 2009). The historical roots of Bangladesh’s identity crisis are deeply intertwined with the socio-political conditions before and after the partition of India. The colonial legacy, coupled with post-colonial policies, played a crucial role in shaping the region’s identity and political trajectory. The complex interplay of these factors has had a lasting impact on Bangladesh’s quest for ontological security, contributing to the ongoing challenges in defining and sustaining a coherent national identity (Talbot & Singh, 2009).

Formation of Bangladesh: Conditions and Events

The formation of Bangladesh was a pivotal moment in South Asian history, marked by a complex interplay of socio-political dynamics, regional grievances, and nationalistic aspirations. This section delves into the socio-political landscape of East Pakistan leading up to the independence movement, highlights key events and movements that culminated in the creation of Bangladesh, and examines the role of prominent leaders who influenced the nation’s ideological direction.

The Socio-Political Landscape of East Pakistan Leading to the Independence Movement: The socio-political conditions in East Pakistan, the region that would later become Bangladesh, were characterized by a profound sense of alienation and disenfranchisement (Khan, 2017). Despite being geographically and culturally distinct from West Pakistan (present-day Pakistan), East Pakistan was governed by a political and administrative system that was dominated by the western wing. This imbalance was a significant source of tension and dissatisfaction among the people of East Pakistan. The economic disparity between the two wings of Pakistan was stark. East Pakistan, with its rich natural resources and significant economic potential, was disproportionately exploited for the benefit of West Pakistan (Rizvi, 2020). The economic policies of the central government led to the exploitation of East Pakistan’s resources, while the region remained underdeveloped compared to the western part of the country. This economic injustice fuelled resentment and contributed to the growing demand for greater autonomy (Choudhury, 2021).

The cultural and linguistic identity of the Bengali-speaking population in East Pakistan further exacerbated the sense of marginalization. The central government’s disregard for Bengali language and culture, coupled with the imposition of Urdu as the sole national language, was seen as an affront to the cultural and linguistic identity of the people in East Pakistan (Hossain, 2019). The language movement of the 1950s, where students and activists protested against the imposition of Urdu, was an early sign of the growing discontent and desire for greater recognition of Bengali identity (Ahmed, 2018).

Key Events and Movements that Culminated in the Creation of Bangladesh: The struggle for autonomy and independence in East Pakistan gained momentum through a series of key events and movements that highlighted the region’s grievances and aspirations. One of the pivotal moments in this struggle was the Six-Point Movement, articulated by Sheikh Mujibur Rahman in 1966. This movement called for greater political and economic autonomy for East Pakistan and sought to address the systemic injustices faced by the region (Rahman, 1966). The Six Points became a rallying cry for the people of East Pakistan and galvanized support for the autonomy movement.

The 1970 general elections in Pakistan marked a turning point in the independence movement. The Awami League, led by Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, won a landslide victory in East Pakistan, securing an overwhelming majority in the National Assembly (Jahan, 2012). However, despite the clear mandate, the central government in West Pakistan, led by President Yahya Khan and the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) under Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, refused to transfer power to the Awami League. This refusal was a direct challenge to the democratic will of the people in East Pakistan and further inflamed the demand for independence (Khan, 2017).

The political impasse and the central government’s reluctance to address the legitimate demands of East Pakistan culminated in the events of March 1971. On March 7, 1971, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman delivered a historic speech at the Racecourse Ground in Dhaka, calling for civil disobedience and non-cooperation with the central government (Rahman, 1971). This speech was a precursor to the widespread unrest and political turmoil that would follow. On March 25, 1971, the Pakistan Army launched a brutal crackdown in Dhaka and other parts of East Pakistan, an event that came to be known as Operation Searchlight (Hossain, 2019). The crackdown resulted in widespread atrocities, including mass killings, rapes, and the destruction of property. The military operation was intended to suppress the independence movement but instead intensified the resolve of the Bengali population to achieve freedom. The brutality of the crackdown garnered international attention and led to widespread condemnation of the Pakistani government (Rizvi, 2020).

In the face of the military crackdown, the Bengali population, under the leadership of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman and the Awami League, declared independence on March 26, 1971 (Jahan, 2012). The Bangladesh Liberation War ensued, with the Mukti Bahini (Liberation Army) fighting against the Pakistani military. The war was marked by immense suffering and sacrifice but ultimately led to victory for the independence forces. The conflict ended with the signing of the Instrument of Surrender on December 16, 1971, which marked the official creation of Bangladesh as an independent nation (Choudhury, 2021). The liberation of Bangladesh was not only a victory for the Bengali people but also a significant moment in the history of South Asia, marking the end of the colonial and post-colonial political arrangement that had bound East Pakistan to West Pakistan.

The Role of Prominent Leaders and Their Influence on the Nation’s Ideological Direction: The struggle for independence and the formation of Bangladesh were shaped by the leadership of several prominent figures who played a crucial role in guiding the nation’s ideological direction. Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, the leader of the Awami League, emerged as the central figure in the independence movement. His leadership, vision, and ability to articulate the aspirations of the Bengali people were instrumental in mobilizing support for the autonomy and independence movement (Rahman, 1966). Sheikh Mujibur Rahman’s Six-Point Movement was a critical factor in shaping the political agenda of East Pakistan. The Six Points articulated a clear vision for greater autonomy and addressed key issues related to political representation, economic control, and cultural recognition (Rahman, 1966). Rahman’s leadership and his ability to unite diverse political and social groups under a common cause were vital in building a cohesive independence movement.

Other leaders, such as Tajuddin Ahmad, Khondakar Mostaq Ahmed, and A.K. Fazlul Huq, also played significant roles in the independence movement (Ahmed, 2018). Their contributions, both in terms of political strategy and mobilization, were crucial in sustaining the movement and navigating the complex political landscape. The international community also played a role in the independence movement, with countries like India providing crucial support to the liberation forces (Jahan, 2012). The diplomatic efforts and international pressure on the Pakistani government helped to bring global attention to the crisis and contributed to the eventual outcome of the conflict.

The formation of Bangladesh was the result of a complex interplay of socio-political conditions, key events, and the leadership of prominent figures. The struggle for independence was driven by a deep-seated sense of injustice and a desire for self-determination. The key events, including the Six-Point Movement, the 1970 elections, and the liberation war, were pivotal in shaping the trajectory of the independence movement. The leadership of figures like Sheikh Mujibur Rahman and the support of the international community were instrumental in realizing the aspiration for an independent Bangladesh.

The Syncretic Nature of Bangladesh in the Pre-Partition Days

In the pre-partition era, the region that would become Bangladesh exhibited a rich tapestry of cultural and religious syncretism, reflecting a complex interplay of diverse traditions, beliefs, and practices (Ahmed, 2015). This syncretic nature was deeply rooted in the region's historical interactions, influenced by a confluence of Hinduism, Islam, and local traditions. The period before the partition of India in 1947 was marked by a unique blend of cultural and religious elements that characterized the socio-religious landscape of what was then Bengal.

Historical Context and Cultural Interactions: The region of Bengal, encompassing modern-day Bangladesh and parts of India, has long been a melting pot of various cultures and religions (Sarkar, 2018). During the medieval period, the arrival of Muslim rulers and traders introduced new religious and cultural influences to the predominantly Hindu society. The Bengal Sultanate, established in the 14th century, played a significant role in this process, fostering an environment where Hindu and Muslim communities coexisted and interacted closely (Choudhury, 2020). This interaction led to the emergence of a syncretic culture that blended elements of Hinduism and Islam. The region saw the development of a shared cultural and religious ethos, where practices and rituals from both traditions were integrated into everyday life. This blending was evident in various aspects of society, including festivals, architectural styles, and social customs.
Religious Syncretism and Shared Practices: One of the most striking examples of syncretism in pre-partition Bengal was the way religious practices and festivals were often shared between Hindu and Muslim communities (Rahman, 2017). Festivals like the Bengali New Year (Pohela Boishakh) were celebrated with enthusiasm by people of all religions, reflecting a common cultural heritage. Similarly, certain Sufi traditions and practices, such as the veneration of saints and the use of devotional music, found resonance among both Muslims and Hindus (Hossain, 2019). The Sufi orders, particularly the Chishti and Qadiri, played a crucial role in fostering this syncretic environment. Sufi shrines and their associated rituals became spaces of interaction and mutual respect between followers of different religions. The popular Sufi saint, Hazrat Shahjalal, and his shrine in Sylhet attracted devotees from various backgrounds, symbolizing the harmonious blend of religious traditions (Sarkar, 2018).
Cultural and Artistic Expressions: The syncretic nature of Bengal was also reflected in its cultural and artistic expressions (Choudhury, 2020). The region's music, dance, and literature showcased a fusion of Hindu and Islamic influences. Baul music, a prominent genre in Bengal, exemplifies this synthesis. Bauls, the wandering minstrel-poets, often incorporated themes from both Hinduism and Sufism into their songs, creating a unique genre that transcended religious boundaries (Rahman, 2017). Architecturally, the region's monuments and structures reveal a synthesis of Hindu and Islamic styles. The architecture of Bengal's mosques, such as the 15th-century mosque in Bagerhat, often included elements reminiscent of Hindu temple designs, demonstrating a blend of artistic traditions (Ahmed, 2015).
Social Harmony and Identity: The syncretic culture of pre-partition Bengal contributed to a sense of shared identity among its diverse population (Hossain, 2019). While religious differences existed, the common cultural practices and mutual respect fostered a sense of unity and belonging. The coexistence of different religious communities, along with their shared traditions and customs, created a social fabric that was both inclusive and resilient. However, the political and social changes leading up to the partition began to challenge this syncretic harmony. The rise of communal politics and the growing emphasis on religious identity created tensions that ultimately led to the division of Bengal and the formation of East and West Pakistan (Sarkar, 2018).

The pre-partition days of Bengal were characterized by a rich and vibrant syncretic culture. The interactions between Hindu and Muslim communities, coupled with the shared religious and cultural practices, created a unique and harmonious social environment. This syncretic heritage remains a significant aspect of the region's history, reflecting a time when diverse traditions and beliefs coexisted and enriched each other.

Identity Crisis and Governance Models

The post-independence era of Bangladesh has been characterized by a tumultuous evolution of governance models and a persistent identity crisis (Ahmed, 2015). The concept of "Bengali ethnicity" is a subject of debate among Muslims in Bangladesh. Historically, the term "Bengali" was primarily associated with the Hindu population of Bengal. The question of whether Muslims in Bengal identify as Bengali, Muslim, or both carries significant social and political implications (Sarkar, 2018). The country's journey from democracy to dictatorship and back again reflects broader struggles with national identity and stability. This section explores the shifts in governance, the impact of these changes on national identity, and the tension between secularism and Islamization.

The Evolution of Bangladesh's Governance from Democracy to Dictatorship and Back: Since its independence in 1971, Bangladesh has experienced a series of political upheavals that have significantly impacted its governance model (Rahman, 2017). Initially, the country was established as a democratic republic, with Sheikh Mujibur Rahman serving as its first President and later as Prime Minister. The early years of Bangladesh’s democracy were marked by efforts to build a new nation and address the challenges of post-war reconstruction. In forming of the nation’s first government, the Bangladesh Awami League (or simply the Awami League) adopted a four-pronged state ideology of nationalism, democracy, socialism, and secularism on the pattern of ‘Nehruvian democratic socialism’. This ideology was touted as ‘Mujibism’ after the name of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman (Choudhury, 2020). However, the democratic experiment faced severe challenges. The political landscape was marred by instability, economic difficulties, and political factionalism. The first decade of Bangladesh's independence was characterized by frequent political crises, including allegations of corruption, mismanagement, and internal conflict. This instability created fertile ground for the rise of authoritarian rule (Hossain, 2019). In 1975, following a series of coups and political unrest, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman was assassinated, and a military coup led to the establishment of a military-backed regime. General Ziaur Rahman, who emerged as a prominent military leader, took control and established an autocratic government. This period marked a significant shift from democratic governance to a more centralized and authoritarian rule (Ahmed, 2015). Ziaur Rahman's regime was characterized by the suppression of political dissent, curtailment of democratic freedoms, and the consolidation of power within the military and executive branches.

In 1981, following the assassination of Ziaur Rahman, General H.M. Ershad assumed power and established another military regime. Ershad's rule continued the trend of authoritarian governance, with a focus on maintaining political control and suppressing opposition (Rahman, 2017). However, the regime faced mounting opposition and calls for democratic restoration, culminating in mass protests and political mobilization. The transition back to democracy began in the early 1990s, with the end of Ershad’s regime and the establishment of a parliamentary democracy. The democratic period saw the emergence of competitive politics, with the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) and the Awami League becoming the dominant political forces (Choudhury, 2020). The restoration of democratic institutions brought a renewed focus on political pluralism and civil liberties. However, the democratic process was often marred by political violence, corruption, and confrontational politics between the major parties.

The Impact of Shifting Political Regimes on National Identity and Stability: The shifting political regimes in Bangladesh have had a profound impact on the nation’s identity and stability (Sarkar, 2018). Each transition, whether from democracy to dictatorship or back again, has influenced the country's national narrative and collective identity. The early democratic years under Sheikh Mujibur Rahman were characterized by efforts to forge a national identity based on the principles of secularism, nationalism, and social justice. However, the subsequent military regimes introduced new dynamics that challenged this foundational identity (Hossain, 2019). The authoritarian rule of Ziaur Rahman and H.M. Ershad emphasized political stability and economic development but often at the cost of democratic principles and civil rights. These regimes promoted a vision of nationalism that was often intertwined with military and political control, leading to a fragmented sense of national identity.

The re-establishment of democracy in the 1990s brought a renewed focus on political pluralism and civil liberties. However, the political landscape remained contentious, with frequent changes in government and persistent conflict between the BNP and the Awami League (Rahman, 2017). The political instability and corruption during this period further exacerbated the sense of identity crisis and undermined national cohesion. The impact of shifting political regimes on stability was also evident in the frequent changes in policy and governance priorities. The oscillation between authoritarianism and democracy created a sense of unpredictability and uncertainty, affecting both domestic and international perceptions of Bangladesh (Choudhury, 2020). The lack of continuity in governance and the frequent disruptions in democratic processes contributed to a sense of instability and insecurity.

The Tension Between Secularism and Islamization in Governance: One of the most contentious issues in Bangladesh's governance has been the tension between secularism and Islamization (Ahmed, 2015). The country was founded on the principles of secularism, with the constitution guaranteeing equal rights for all citizens regardless of their religion. However, the influence of Islamization in governance has been a recurring theme in Bangladesh's political history (Sarkar, 2018). The early years of Bangladesh’s independence emphasized secularism as a core principle of national identity. Sheikh Mujibur Rahman’s government sought to promote a secular state that respected the diverse religious and cultural heritage of the Bengali people. However, the subsequent military regimes introduced changes that shifted the balance between secularism and Islamization (Hossain, 2019).

General Ziaur Rahman’s regime, for instance, made significant changes to the constitution, including the introduction of Islamic principles into the legal and political framework. This shift was aimed at garnering support from conservative and Islamist groups, but it also led to a tension between the secular ideals of the founding leaders and the growing influence of Islamization (Rahman, 2017). H.M. Ershad’s regime further institutionalized Islamic principles, including the introduction of Islamic laws and the incorporation of religious rhetoric into the political discourse. These changes were part of a broader strategy to consolidate power and appeal to various segments of society. However, the emphasis on Islamization also created divisions and tensions within the country, with secular and progressive groups expressing concern over the erosion of secular values (Choudhury, 2020).

The return to democracy in the 1990s and the 2000s saw a renewed debate over the role of Islam in governance. The Awami League and the BNP both grappled with the challenge of balancing secularism with the demands of Islamic groups and voters. The political landscape became increasingly polarized, with debates over the role of religion in public life and governance becoming a central issue (Hossain, 2019). The tension between secularism and Islamization continues to be a defining feature of Bangladesh’s political discourse. The challenges of maintaining a secular state while accommodating the diverse religious and cultural identities of the population remain a critical issue for the country’s stability and cohesion (Ahmed, 2015). The ongoing struggle to reconcile these competing values has contributed to the broader identity crisis faced by Bangladesh.

The evolution of Bangladesh’s governance, the impact of shifting political regimes on national identity and stability, and the tension between secularism and Islamization reflect the complex and often contentious nature of the country’s political history. These factors have shaped the national identity and contributed to the ongoing challenges of achieving a stable and cohesive society. Antonio Gramsci's theory of hegemony provides a useful lens through which to understand the changes in governance structures (Gramsci, 1971). Gramsci’s concept of hegemony involves the dominant class or group maintaining power not just through coercion, but by shaping the ideological and cultural norms of society. This dominance is achieved by creating a consensus around a set of values and beliefs that seem natural and beneficial to all, thereby maintaining control in a more subtle and integrated manner. As communal politics began to rise, new hegemonic forces emerged that sought to reshape this consensus. The increasing polarization between Hindu and Muslim identities was driven by political actors who aimed to consolidate power by emphasizing religious differences rather than commonalities (Gramsci, 1971). The new political realities and the influence of dominant groups led to a decline in the previously dominant syncretic culture. The political narratives that emerged were focused on religious identity rather than shared cultural heritage, altering the ideological consensus that had previously sustained the region's social cohesion.

Religious Identity and Secularism

Bangladesh's ongoing struggle with its national identity is deeply shaped by the interplay between religious and secular dynamics. With Muslims making up around 90% of the population, the country's development has been heavily influenced by the role of Islam in shaping its national identity and policies (Riaz, 2008). Religious minorities in Bangladesh include Hindus, Buddhists, Christians, and animists, with Hindus being the largest minority group. This community has maintained strong social, cultural, and economic ties with their co-religionists in West Bengal, India, and they are a significant electoral base for the Awami League (Siddique, 2001). For many Muslims, particularly in rural areas, religion serves as their primary identity, often taking precedence over language and ethnic background (Jahan, 1972). Additionally, a substantial portion of the population perceives Hindus and Muslims as distinct communities, each with its own unique set of philosophies, customs, traditions, political and literary heroes, as well as differences in diet and dress (Chowdhury, 2013). This section explores the challenges of integrating Islamic principles within a secular governance framework, the difficulties in upholding a secular state in a predominantly Muslim society, and the impact of religious and secular ideologies on the nation’s political and social dynamics.

The Role of Islam in Shaping National Identity and Policy

Islam has played a pivotal role in shaping Bangladesh’s national identity and policy-making since the country’s inception (Hossain, 2017). The significance of Islam in Bangladesh’s history dates back to the pre-partition era when the region that would become East Bengal was deeply influenced by Islamic culture and heritage (Mujahid, 1985). The majority of the population in what was then East Bengal were Muslims, and their cultural and religious practices shaped the regional identity. The creation of Pakistan in 1947, which initially included East Bengal as East Pakistan, further reinforced the role of Islam in national identity (Khan, 2006). Pakistan was established as an Islamic state, and this framework continued to influence the political and social landscape of East Pakistan (Khan, 2006). The religious identity of the people in East Bengal was intertwined with the broader Islamic vision of Pakistan, which often overshadowed local cultural and regional aspirations (Riaz, 2008).

When Bangladesh gained independence in 1971, the new nation was founded on the principles of secularism, nationalism, and social justice (Jahan, 1972). The leadership of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman envisioned a country where all religions would be respected, and secular values would guide governance and policy. This vision was an attempt to create a unified national identity that transcended religious divides and focused on the broader aspirations of the Bengali people (Siddique, 2001). However, the influence of Islam remained significant in shaping national identity and policy (Hossain, 2017). The secular principles established by the early government were challenged by the presence of Islamic political forces and societal expectations (Chowdhury, 2013). The 1970s and 1980s saw the rise of Islamist political parties and movements, which sought to incorporate Islamic values into the national framework (Mujahid, 1985). This period marked a shift from the secular vision of the founding leaders towards a more Islamically oriented approach in governance (Jahan, 1972).

General Ziaur Rahman’s regime, which came to power in 1975, played a crucial role in redefining the role of Islam in Bangladesh (Khan, 2006). Ziaur Rahman’s government sought to integrate Islamic principles into the legal and political system, reflecting the broader Islamic orientation of his regime (Hossain, 2017). This shift was aimed at appealing to conservative and Islamist segments of society, and it included changes such as the incorporation of Islamic laws and the use of Islamic rhetoric in political discourse (Riaz, 2008). The influence of Islam in shaping national identity and policy continued under H.M. Ershad’s regime, which further institutionalized Islamic principles (Mujahid, 1985). The introduction of Islamic laws and the promotion of Islamic values were seen as part of the broader strategy to consolidate political power and address the demands of various social groups (Chowdhury, 2013). This period highlighted the ongoing tension between secular and Islamic ideals in shaping the country’s identity (Siddique, 2001).

The Challenges of Maintaining a Secular State in a Predominantly Muslim Society

Maintaining a secular state in a predominantly Muslim society like Bangladesh presents significant challenges (Hossain, 2017). The country’s secular framework, as envisioned by its founders, has often been at odds with the religious realities and societal expectations of a predominantly Muslim population (Chowdhury, 2013). The challenge lies in balancing the principles of secularism with the cultural and religious identity of the majority (Jahan, 1972). One of the primary challenges is the tension between secular and religious values in the legal and political system (Riaz, 2008). Secularism in Bangladesh was intended to ensure equal rights and opportunities for people of all religions and to prevent any single religion from dominating the state (Siddique, 2001). However, the integration of Islamic principles into the legal system has often created conflicts with secular ideals (Mujahid, 1985). For example, issues related to family law, inheritance, and personal status have been influenced by Islamic principles, leading to debates over the extent to which secular laws should prevail (Hossain, 2017).

The societal expectations of a predominantly Muslim population also pose challenges for secular governance (Chowdhury, 2013). The influence of religious norms and values on social behaviour and public life can create tensions with secular policies and practices (Jahan, 1972). For instance, the role of Islamic practices in public spaces, such as the observance of prayer times and the celebration of religious festivals, can sometimes conflict with secular regulations and policies (Riaz, 2008). Additionally, political leaders and parties in Bangladesh have often navigated these challenges by adopting positions that reflect the religious sentiments of the electorate (Hossain, 2017). Political parties, including both the Awami League and the BNP, have had to balance their secular credentials with the need to address the demands of religious constituencies (Siddique, 2001). This balancing act has led to shifts in policy and rhetoric that reflect the influence of religious ideologies on political strategies (Chowdhury, 2013).

The challenge of maintaining a secular state is further complicated by the presence of extremist and radical elements within society (Riaz, 2008). Islamist extremist groups have occasionally sought to undermine secular values and promote their vision of an Islamic state (Mujahid, 1985). The rise of such groups has intensified debates over secularism and highlighted the vulnerabilities of a secular framework in a predominantly Muslim society (Hossain, 2017).

The Influence of Religious and Secular Ideologies on Political and Social Dynamics

The interplay between religious and secular ideologies has had a profound impact on Bangladesh’s political and social dynamics (Jahan, 1972). The influence of these ideologies is evident in various aspects of public life, including politics, education, and cultural practices (Riaz, 2008). Politically, the influence of religious ideologies has shaped electoral strategies and party platforms (Siddique, 2001). Political parties have often adopted religious rhetoric and positions to appeal to specific voter bases (Chowdhury, 2013). This influence can be seen in the way political campaigns are conducted and in the policies that are promoted (Hossain, 2017). The need to cater to religious sentiments has sometimes led to compromises on secular principles and has influenced the formulation of national policies (Mujahid, 1985).

Socially, the influence of religious and secular ideologies is reflected in cultural practices and societal norms (Chowdhury, 2013). The tension between secular and religious values can be seen in debates over issues such as women’s rights, educational curricula, and public morality (Hossain, 2017). The role of religion in public life, including the observance of religious practices and the promotion of religious values, continues to be a source of contention and negotiation (Jahan, 1972). The ideological divide also affects the broader discourse on national identity (Riaz, 2008). The struggle to reconcile religious and secular values has led to ongoing debates about what constitutes Bangladeshi identity and how it should be defined (Siddique, 2001). The conflicting visions of a secular versus an Islamic identity reflect deeper questions about the country’s historical legacy, cultural heritage, and future direction (Mujahid, 1985).

The role of Islam in shaping national identity and policy, the challenges of maintaining a secular state in a predominantly Muslim society, and the influence of religious and secular ideologies on political and social dynamics all play crucial roles in Bangladesh’s ongoing identity crisis (Jahan, 1972). The complexity of integrating Islamic principles with secular governance continues to shape the country’s political and social landscape, reflecting the broader struggles with identity and stability (Hossain, 2017).

Bengali Identity and Bangladeshi Nationalism: A Complex Interplay of Identity Politics

The interplay between Bengali identity and Bangladeshi nationalism has been a contentious issue in the sociopolitical landscape of Bangladesh (Tajfel & Turner, 1986). These concepts, while distinct in their origins and implications, have been used interchangeably by various actors, including the ruling elite, religious fanatics, and the predominantly rural, religious majority (Chowdhury, 2013). It is important to delve into the nuanced relationship between these identities, examining how they have been manipulated to serve different agendas to be able to grasp the identity challenges being faced by the citizens of the nation (Siddique, 2001). While identity, as a sociological and political construct, is central to understanding the dynamics of nationalism (Tajfel & Turner, 1986). Social Identity Theory (SIT), developed by Henri Tajfel and John Turner (1986), posits that individuals derive a sense of self from their membership in social groups. This theory is pertinent in understanding how Bengali identity, rooted in language, culture, and history, has been constructed and contested in Bangladesh (Chowdhury, 2013).

Bengali identity, deeply rooted in language and culture, has historically been a unifying force in the Bengal region (Siddique, 2001). Before the partition of India in 1947, Bengal was a culturally and linguistically cohesive region, despite religious differences (Jahan, 1972). The Bengali Renaissance in the 19th century, led by figures like Rabindranath Tagore and Kazi Nazrul Islam, fostered a strong sense of cultural pride among Bengalis, both Hindu and Muslim (Hossain, 2017). Although the struggle for autonomy in East Pakistan that eventually led to the independence of Bangladesh in 1971 was primarily driven by Bengali nationalism, which was secular and inclusive of all religious communities (Mujahid, 1985), the post-independence period saw a gradual shift in the official narrative, with the ruling elite attempting to redefine national identity in terms of Bangladeshi nationalism, as opposed to Bengali nationalism (Riaz, 2008).

The first non-secular underpinnings of Bangladeshi nationalism that was distinctly different from Bengaliness was propagated by General Ziaur Rahman and later by the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) (Khan, 2006). It sought to emphasize the Islamic identity of the nation (Riaz, 2008). This shift was partly a response to the perceived threat of Indian cultural domination, as well as an attempt to legitimize the military regime's rule (Chowdhury, 2013). By invoking Islam as a unifying factor, the ruling elite sought to undermine the secular foundations of Bengali nationalism and create a new national identity that was more aligned with the conservative and religious sentiments of the majority population (Hossain, 2017).

The interchangeability of Bengali identity and Bangladeshi nationalism has been a strategic tool for the ruling elite and religious leaders (Jahan, 1972). While Bengali identity is inclusive and secular, Bangladeshi nationalism is exclusionary and religious (Siddique, 2001). The ruling elite has oscillated between these identities depending on the political context and the need to consolidate power (Riaz, 2008). For instance, during the tenure of the Awami League, which is traditionally associated with secularism and Bengali nationalism, there has been an emphasis on cultural events such as Ekushey February (International Mother Language Day) and the promotion of Bengali literature and arts (Chowdhury, 2013). This approach appeals to the educated urban middle class and the intelligentsia, who see themselves as the custodians of Bengali culture (Hossain, 2017). Conversely, when the BNP or other right-wing parties are in power, there is a noticeable shift towards promoting Islamic values and Bangladeshi nationalism (Jahan, 1972). This narrative appeals to the rural, religious majority, who see Islam as the primary marker of their identity (Riaz, 2008). The madrassa education system, which primarily focuses on religious teachings, further reinforces this identity among the rural populace (Siddique, 2001).

Religious leaders and Islamist groups have also played a significant role in shaping the narrative of Bangladeshi nationalism (Chowdhury, 2013). By equating national identity with Islamic identity, they have been able to mobilize the masses and challenge the secular foundations of the state (Mujahid, 1985). The rise of Islamist parties such as Jamaat-e-Islami and the proliferation of radical groups like Hifazat-e-Islam are manifestations of this trend (Hossain, 2017). These groups have capitalized on the religious sentiments of the majority population, portraying secularism as a threat to Islam (Jahan, 1972). They have also used the concept of Bangladeshi nationalism to oppose any perceived influence of Indian (read: Hindu) culture in Bangladesh (Riaz, 2008). This has led to a narrowing of the national identity, where being Bangladeshi is increasingly synonymous with being a devout Muslim (Chowdhury, 2013).

The largely illiterate and religious majority in Bangladesh has been a vulnerable target for the ruling elite and religious fanatics (Mujahid, 1985). With limited access to secular education and exposure to alternative narratives, this demographic is easily swayed by religious rhetoric (Jahan, 1972). The madrassa system, which is the primary source of education for many in rural areas, perpetuates a religious worldview that aligns with Bangladeshi nationalism rather than Bengali identity (Hossain, 2017). This demographic has also been instrumentalized during elections, where political parties appeal to their religious sentiments to secure votes (Chowdhury, 2013). The concept of Bangladeshi nationalism, with its emphasis on Islam, resonates with this group more than the secular, cultural aspects of Bengali identity (Siddique, 2001). As a result, the rural population often perceives any promotion of Bengali culture as an elitist, urban phenomenon that is disconnected from their lived realities (Riaz, 2008).

The interchangeability of Bengali identity and Bangladeshi nationalism reflects the complex and often contradictory nature of national identity in Bangladesh (Hossain, 2017). While Bengali identity is rooted in a rich cultural and linguistic heritage, Bangladeshi nationalism is a more recent construct that seeks to align national identity with religious identity (Jahan, 1972). The ruling elite, religious fanatics, and the largely illiterate and religious majority have all used these identities to further their respective agendas (Chowdhury, 2013).

Ontological Insecurity and Its Implications

Ontological insecurity, characterized by a profound sense of instability and confusion regarding one's identity, has become a significant issue in Bangladesh due to its ongoing ideological vacillation. This section analyzes how identity confusion has contributed to ontological insecurity in the country, examines the impact of ideological shifts on social cohesion and economic development, and provides examples illustrating the effects of this insecurity on Bangladesh’s trajectory.

Analysis of How Identity Confusion Contributes to Ontological Insecurity

Ontological security refers to the sense of stability and coherence that individuals or nations derive from a clear and consistent identity (Giddens, 1991). In the context of Bangladesh, the country’s fluctuating ideological stance — ranging from secularism to Islamization, democracy to dictatorship — has created a pervasive sense of ontological insecurity (Jahan, 1972). This confusion regarding national identity has profound implications for the country’s stability and development. The roots of Bangladesh’s ontological insecurity can be traced back to the very conditions leading to its creation. The historical journey from being part of British India to becoming East Bengal, and later East Pakistan, was marked by significant identity shifts (Chowdhury, 2013). The partition of India and the subsequent creation of Pakistan set the stage for a complex interplay of religious, cultural, and political identities (Khan, 2006). The initial struggle for an independent East Bengal was driven by a desire to preserve Bengali identity within a larger Islamic framework (Riaz, 2008). However, the shift from East Bengal to East Pakistan, and eventually to Bangladesh, introduced new layers of identity confusion.

The post-independence era further complicated matters. Bangladesh was established with a vision of secularism, aiming to integrate various religious and cultural identities into a cohesive national framework (Siddique, 2001). Yet, the persistent influence of Islamic political forces and periodic shifts towards more conservative Islamic policies have created an environment of uncertainty (Mujahid, 1985). The oscillation between secular and religious orientations has led to a fragmented national identity, where competing ideologies often clash rather than coalesce into a unified vision (Giddens, 1991). This constant flux between competing ideological frameworks undermines the sense of stability necessary for ontological security. When a nation’s identity is not clearly defined or consistently upheld, it results in a collective anxiety about the future and a lack of confidence in the nation’s trajectory (Jahan, 1972). In Bangladesh, this ontological insecurity manifests in the political, social, and economic realms, affecting the country’s overall stability.

The Impact of Ideological Vacillation on Social Cohesion and Economic Development

The ideological vacillation in Bangladesh has had significant repercussions for social cohesion and economic development. The shifting political and ideological landscape has created a fragmented society where divergent views on governance and identity often lead to conflict rather than consensus (Chowdhury, 2013).

Social Cohesion: The instability arising from ideological confusion has strained social cohesion within Bangladesh (Giddens, 1991). The oscillation between secular and religious policies has often led to polarization within society. Different segments of the Hindu, Christian, and Buddhist population have aligned themselves with competing ideological factions, leading to sectarian tensions and social fragmentation (Mujahid, 1985). For example, the rise of Islamist political parties and their influence on governance have sometimes led to conflicts with secular and progressive segments of society. This division is evident in public demonstrations, political clashes, and societal debates over issues such as women’s rights and educational reforms (Khan, 2006). The lack of a unified national identity also affects the sense of belonging and national pride among the populace. When people are uncertain about the direction of their country and its core values, it becomes challenging to foster a strong sense of national unity. This weakened social cohesion can manifest in various forms, including reduced civic engagement, increased communal tensions, and challenges in implementing cohesive social policies (Riaz, 2008).
Economic Development: Ideological vacillation also impacts economic development by creating an environment of uncertainty and instability (Siddique, 2001). Investors and businesses often seek stable and predictable environments for long-term planning and investment. The frequent shifts in policy and governance can undermine investor confidence and deter foreign investment (Chowdhury, 2013). Economic policies that are influenced by changing ideological perspectives may lack continuity and coherence, leading to inefficiencies and disruptions in economic planning (Jahan, 1972). Moreover, the focus on ideological debates and political conflicts can divert attention and resources away from essential economic reforms and development initiatives. For instance, the emphasis on religious or ideological issues may overshadow critical economic challenges such as infrastructure development, poverty alleviation, and industrial growth (Giddens, 1991). This diversion can hinder progress and exacerbate economic disparities within the country.

Examples Illustrating the Effects of Ontological Insecurity in Bangladesh

Several examples illustrate the tangible effects of ontological insecurity in Bangladesh, highlighting the ways in which identity confusion has shaped the country’s trajectory:

Political Instability: Bangladesh has experienced periods of political instability and violence often linked to ideological conflicts (Riaz, 2008). For instance, the political turmoil surrounding the rise of Islamist parties and the subsequent tensions with secularist factions have led to frequent protests, clashes, and political unrest (Khan, 2006). The shifting balance between secular and religious orientations has contributed to a volatile political environment, impacting governance and democratic processes (Chowdhury, 2013).
Cultural and Social Tensions: The oscillation between secular and religious values has created cultural and social tensions within Bangladesh (Mujahid, 1985). Debates over issues such as religious education, the role of women in society, and the celebration of religious festivals reflect deeper conflicts about national identity. For example, controversies over the curriculum in schools and universities, where debates about the inclusion of Islamic versus secular content have led to heated disputes among educators, policymakers, and the public (Siddique, 2001).
Economic Challenges: The impact of ontological insecurity on economic development is evident in the country’s struggle to attract foreign investment and maintain economic growth (Giddens, 1991). The shifting political landscape and inconsistent economic policies have created an environment of uncertainty for investors. Instances of policy reversals and changes in economic direction have led to disruptions in business operations and hindered long-term economic planning (Chowdhury, 2013).
Identity Politics: The role of identity politics in Bangladesh highlights the effects of ontological insecurity (Riaz, 2008). Political parties and leaders often leverage religious or cultural identity to gain electoral support, which can exacerbate existing divisions within society. The emphasis on identity-based politics can further entrench ideological divides and impede efforts to build a cohesive national identity (Jahan, 1972).

Ontological insecurity in Bangladesh arises from the nation’s ongoing ideological vacillation and identity confusion. This insecurity impacts social cohesion, economic development, and political stability, reflecting the broader challenges of integrating competing ideological frameworks into a unified national vision. The examples provided illustrate the tangible effects of this insecurity, emphasizing the need for a more stable and coherent approach to national identity and policy-making. The challenge for Bangladesh will be to reconcile competing identities in a way that fosters social cohesion and national unity. This will require a nuanced understanding of the country's history, culture, and religious dynamics, as well as a commitment to promoting inclusive and pluralistic narratives that can accommodate both Bengali and Bangladeshi identities. Without such an approach, the tension between these identities is likely to persist, with implications for the country's social and political stability.

Policy Prescription - The Need for a Stable Framework

Addressing Bangladesh’s ongoing crisis requires a nuanced understanding of its historical and cultural context. The country’s diverse identity elements—shaped by its colonial past, religious influences, and evolving political ideologies—must be reconciled to create a stable framework that fosters a cohesive national narrative.

Historical Context: A comprehensive approach to resolving the crisis involves acknowledging and addressing the historical factors that have contributed to Bangladesh’s identity struggles. This includes understanding the impact of colonial and post-colonial policies, the role of key historical events, and the evolution of the nation’s identity over time (Chowdhury, 2013).
Cultural Reconciliation: To build a stable framework, there must be an effort to reconcile the diverse cultural and ideological elements within Bangladesh. This involves creating a national narrative that embraces the country’s pluralistic identity while addressing the tensions between secular and religious values (Giddens, 1991). A focus on cultural dialogue and inclusivity can help bridge divides and foster a sense of shared identity (Mujahid, 1985).
Governance and Policy Stability: Establishing a stable governance framework is crucial for addressing the ongoing crisis. This involves creating consistent and coherent policies that reflect the nation’s values and aspirations (Siddique, 2001). Ensuring that governance models are inclusive and representative of the country’s diverse population can help build trust and stability (Riaz, 2008).
National Unity and Identity: Building a cohesive national identity requires a concerted effort to promote unity and shared values. This involves fostering a sense of national pride and belonging that transcends ideological and cultural divides. Educational initiatives, public discourse, and cultural programs can play a role in strengthening national unity and reinforcing a positive national identity (Khan, 2006).

Conclusion

The ongoing crisis in Bangladesh is deeply rooted in the failure to establish a stable ontological security amidst its shifting ideological landscapes. This failure has led to profound consequences for the nation's political stability, social cohesion, and economic development. By tracing the historical journey from the partition of India to the formation of East Bengal, and eventually to the creation of Bangladesh, one can better understand the intricate interplay of identity struggles and governance challenges that have shaped the country’s current predicament. The historical trajectory of Bangladesh — from being part of British India, through its role as East Bengal and later East Pakistan, to its ultimate independence — has been marked by significant shifts in identity and governance. The socio-political conditions before the partition of India set the stage for the creation of East Bengal, which later became East Pakistan. The initial push for an independent East Bengal was driven by a desire to preserve Bengali identity within a larger Islamic framework. However, the subsequent transition to East Pakistan introduced new challenges and complexities in defining a cohesive national identity. The partition of India in 1947 and the creation of Pakistan were pivotal moments that laid the groundwork for Bangladesh’s later identity crises. East Bengal’s transformation into East Pakistan was characterized by a struggle to maintain a distinct Bengali identity while being part of a larger Islamic state. The colonial and post-colonial policies that influenced regional identity contributed to the confusion and tension that would later fuel the quest for an independent Bangladesh. The formation of Bangladesh in 1971, following a bloody liberation struggle, was initially framed as a victory for secularism and the Bengali identity. However, the subsequent political and ideological shifts have led to a continuous re-evaluation of the nation’s core values and identity. The oscillation between secularism and Islamization, along with the frequent changes in governance models, has created an environment of instability and uncertainty.

The ideological vacillation in Bangladesh has had profound implications for its political stability and social cohesion. The frequent shifts between secularism, Islamization, democracy, and dictatorship have not only led to political instability but have also undermined the nation's sense of identity and coherence. In conclusion, the crisis in Bangladesh is a complex issue rooted in the failure to establish a stable ontological security amidst shifting ideological landscapes. The historical journey from the partition of India to the creation of Bangladesh has been marked by identity struggles and governance challenges. Addressing these issues requires a comprehensive approach that considers the historical context, reconciles cultural and ideological elements, and fosters a stable governance framework. By doing so, Bangladesh can work towards overcoming its ontological insecurity and achieving a more stable and prosperous future.

References

Ahmed, A. (2018). The Language Movement and the Struggle for Identity in Bangladesh. Bangladesh: Dhaka University Press.
Ahmed, S. (2015). Syncretism in Pre-Partition Bengal: Cultural and Religious Interactions. Bangladesh: Dhaka University Press.
Ahmed, S. (2015). The Evolution of Bangladesh's Governance and Identity. Bangladesh: Dhaka University Press.
Bass, G. J. (2013). The blood telegram: Nixon, Kissinger, and a forgotten genocide. United States: Alfred A. Knopf.
Bose, S. (2009). His majesty's opponent: Subhas Chandra Bose and India's struggle against empire. United States: Harvard University Press.
Brown, J. (1994). Modern India: The origins of an Asian democracy. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Chatterji, J. (1994). Bengal divided: Hindu communalism and partition, 1932-1947. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Chowdhury, A. (2013). The Bangladesh crisis: Secularism, Islamization, and the identity dilemma. United Kingdom: Routledge.
Chowdhury, A. (2018). Politics of secularism in Bangladesh. United Kingdom: Routledge.
Choudhury, M. (2020). Cultural Fusion and Religious Harmony in Bengal. Historical Studies Review, 11(2), 78-92.
Choudhury, M. (2021). Economic Disparities and Regional Tensions in Pre-Independence Pakistan. South Asian Studies Review, 15(2), 45-67.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. United States: Stanford University Press.
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. United States: International Publishers.
Hashmi, T. I. (2000). Islam, nationalism and the West: Issues of identity in Bangladesh. United Kingdom: Routledge.
Hossain, A. (2018). Bangladesh in turmoil: Identity politics and social transformation. United Kingdom: Springer.
Hossain, M. (2019). Operation Searchlight: The Brutal Crackdown in East Pakistan. Historical Perspectives, 24(1), 112-135.
Hossain, M. (2019). Islamization and Secularism in Bangladesh: A Historical Perspective. Journal of South Asian Studies, 7(3), 120-135.
Hossain, M. (2019). Sufi Traditions and Interfaith Relations in Bengal. Journal of South Asian Studies, 7(3), 120-135.
Jahan, R. (1972). Pakistan: Failure in national integration. United States: Columbia University Press.
Jahan, R. (2012). The Bangladesh Liberation War and Its Aftermath. Bangladesh: Dhaka Academic Publications.
Jalal, A. (1985). The sole spokesman: Jinnah, the Muslim League and the demand for Pakistan. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Jalal, A. (1995). Democracy and authoritarianism in South Asia: A comparative and historical perspective. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Jalal, A. (2014). The struggle for Pakistan: A Muslim homeland and global politics. United States: Harvard University Press.
Jinnah, M. A. (1947). Speeches and writings of Mr. Jinnah: 1911-1947. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Joya, A. (2013). The political economy of colonialism in Bengal: 1793–1837. United Kingdom: Routledge.
Kabir, H. (2019). Constitutional secularism in Bangladesh: Its rise and fall. Journal of South Asian Studies, 44(3), 227-241.
Khan, S. (2017). The Political Landscape of Pre-Independence East Pakistan. Political History Quarterly, 8(3), 89-104.
Khan, S. A. (2006). Bangladesh: Politics, economy and civil society. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Lewis, D. (2011). Bangladesh: Politics, economy and civil society. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Mascarenhas, A. (1986). The rape of Bangladesh. India: Vikas Publishing House.
Metcalf, B. D., & Metcalf, T. R. (2006). A concise history of modern India. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Mitzen, J. (2006). Ontological security in world politics: State identity and the security dilemma. European Journal of International Relations, 12(3), 341-370.
Mujahid, M. (1985). The rise of Islamic movements in Bangladesh: 1970–1980. Bangladesh: University Press Limited.
Rahman, A. (2017). Baul Music and Its Syncretic Roots. Music and Culture Journal, 4(1), 34-50.
Rahman, M. M. (2014). Bengali nationalism and Bangladesh's foreign policy. Singapore: Institute of South Asian Studies.
Rahman, S. M. (1966). The Six-Point Movement: A Demand for Autonomy. Journal of South Asian Politics, 2(1), 20-34.
Rahman, S. M. (1971). The Call for Independence: March 7 Speech. Dhaka Historical Journal, 5(1), 56-78.
Rahman, A. (2017). Democratic Transitions and Political Instability in Bangladesh. Political Science Review, 15(4), 52-68.
Raghavan, S. (2013). 1971: A global history of the creation of Bangladesh. United States: Harvard University Press.
Riaz, A. (2008). Islamic fundamentalism in Bangladesh: A comprehensive study. United Kingdom: Ashgate Publishing.
Riaz, A. (2016). Bangladesh: A political history since independence. United Kingdom: I. B. Tauris.
Rizvi, H. (2020). Economic Exploitation and Regional Discontent: East Pakistan. Economic History Review, 33(4), 78-95.
Sarkar, J. (2018). The Bengal Sultanate and Its Impact on Regional Syncretism. South Asian History Review, 15(1), 23-45.
Sarkar, S. (1989). Modern India: 1885-1947. United Kingdom: Macmillan.
Sheikh, M. (2009). Islamic resurgence in Bangladesh. United Kingdom: Springer.
Siddiqi, M. (2015). Islamization and the politics of national identity in Bangladesh. Islamic Studies Review, 23(1), 19-45.
Siddique, A. (2001). The political economy of Bangladesh: An analysis of growth, poverty, and inequality. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Sisson, R., & Rose, L. E. (1991). War and secession: Pakistan, India, and the creation of Bangladesh. United States: University of California Press.
Talbot, I. (2016). A history of modern South Asia: Politics, states, diasporas. United States: Yale University Press.
Talbot, I., & Singh, G. (2009). The partition of India. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.