Preprint
Review

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Evolution of β-Lactam Antibiotic Resistance in Proteus Species: From Extended-Spectrum and Plasmid-Mediated AmpC β-Lactamases to Carbapenemases

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

19 January 2025

Posted:

21 January 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract

The management of infectious diseases has proven to be a daunting task for clinicians worldwide and the rapid development of antibiotic resistance among Gram-negative bacteria is making it even more challenging. The first-line therapy is empirical and it most often comprises β-lactam antibiotics. Among Gram-negative bacteria Proteus mirabilis, important community and hospital pathogen associated primarily with urinary tract and wound infection, holds a special place. This review’s aim was to collate and examine recent studies investigating resistance phenotypes and mechanisms of Proteus species and the global significance of its resistance evolution. P. mirabilis as the dominant pathogen develops resistance to expanded-spectrum cephalosporins (ESC) by producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) and plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamases (p-AmpC). β-lactamase-mediated resistance to carbapenems in Enterobacterales including Proteus spp. is mostly due to expression of carbapenemases of class A (KPC), class B (metallo-β-lactamases or MBLs of IMP, VIM or NDM series) or class D or carbapenem-hydrolyzing oxacillinases (CHDL). Previously, a dominant ESBL type in P. mirabilis was TEM-52, yet lately it has been replaced by CTX-M variants, particularly CTX-M-3 and CTX-M-65. ESC resistance can also be mediated by p-AmpC with CMY-16 as the dominant variant. Carbapenem resistance in Proteus spp. is a challenge due to its intrinsic resistance to colistin and tigecyclin. The first carbapenemases reported, belonged to class B, most frequently VIM-1 and NDM-5. In Europe, predominantly France and Belgium, a clonal lineage positive for OXA-23 CHD spread rapidly undetected, due to its low-level resistance to carbapenems. Amazing capacity of Proteus spp. to accumulate a plethora of various resistance traits leading to multidrug or extensively- drug- resistant phenotype.

Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  

2. Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamases

Ampicillin resistance is usually linked to production of TEM-1 or TEM-2 β-lactamases which do not hydrolyze ESC. Early studies found TEM-52 and PER-1 ESBLs to be dominant resistance determinants to expanded-spectrum cephalosporins in P. mirabilis [14,15]. TEM-52 was also found in P. mirabilis from southern Mediterranean regions of Croatia [16,17]. TEM-52 and PER-1 are both ceftazidimases which preferentially hydrolyze ceftazidime. In North Africa isolates positive for PER-1 were identified in P. vulgaris [18]. Switch to CTX-M variants was observed in early 2010s. blaCTX-M-15 genes were preceded by an insertion element ISEcp responsible for the mobilization of the gene and increased expression leading to high level resistance to all cephalosporins [19]. The isolates reported in Russia were found to harbor blaCTX-M-65 gene with additional blaVEB encoding Vietnam-extended-spectrum β-lactamase, aac6-Ib genes encoding aminoglycoside resistance and qnrA1 for fluoroquinolone resistance [20]. Whole- genome sequencing (WGS) revealed that isolates belonged into two different clones. blaCTX-M-3 and blaCTX-M-65 gene in animal P. mirabilis isolates from Hong Kong were located in Tn7-like composite transposon [21]. Unlike previous studies, the ESBL encoding genes were chromosomally encoded. Genes responsible for sulphonamide resistance sul1 and sul2, and chloramphenicol catB3 were located on the chromosome as well [21].
Rare type of ESBL found in P. mirabilis is VEB-1, previously reported in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which coproduced NDM-5 MBL [22]. The patient with subphrenic abscess was previously treated with broad spectrum cephalosporins in Bangladesh [22].
Table 1. ESBL reported in Proteus species.
Table 1. ESBL reported in Proteus species.
Type of ESBL Substrate profile reference
PER-1 Penicillins, ESC, cefepime, monobactams [18]
VEB-1 Penicillins, ESC, cefepime, monobactams [22]
TEM-52 Penicillins, ESC, cefepime, monobactams [14,15,16,17]
CTX-M-3 Penicillins, ESC, cefepime, monobactams [21]
CTX-M-65 Penicillins, ESC, cefepime, monobactams [20]
CTX-M-15 Penicillins, ESC, cefepime, monobactams [19]

3. AmpC β-Lactamases

Reports on p-AmpC β-lactamases are also very scarce in the medical bibliography. Most publications report β-lactamases belonging to CMY family [23]. Proteus species does not have chromosomal AmpC genes and thus all AmpC beta-lactamases are supposed to be plasmid mediated. However, some studies proved chromosomal integration of bla>ampC genes mediated by ISEcp1 insertion element [23].
The acquired blaCMY genes have escaped from the chromosome of C. freundii following mobilization mediated by ISEcp1, IS26 or ISCR1. CMY-1, CMY-12 and CMY-16 were found to be the most prevalent variants of plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamases in Europe [23]. CMY family is derived by chromosomal AmpC β-lactamases of Citrobacter freundii. In addition, mobile insertion sequences such as IS26 and/or ISEcp1, which can be found upstream of blaAmpC genes can facilitate their mobilization. Similar genetic context with ISEcp1 preceding blaCMY-16 was previously reported [23]. Simultaneous production of ESBLs and AmpC β-lactamases was also reported in P. mirabilis in recent studies [24]. CMY-16 was previously reported in P. mirabilis from a long-term care facility in Italy [25] and Croatia [26]. In the Italian study TEM-92 which is an ESBL and plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamase CMY-16 were found. Similarly, as in our study CMY-16 producing organisms had similar resistance phenotypes, unlike those possessing ESBL [25]. CMY-16 producing organisms with similar properties as those present in the nursing homes were also identified in the hospital in southern Croatia [27]. Similarly, as the isolates from Zagreb, they demonstrated resistance to sulphonamides, fluoroquinolones and 80% to aminoglycosides. All isolates were susceptible to carbapenems, ceftazidime-avibactam and fosfomycin. blaCMY genes were associated with and ISEcp insertion element 110 bp upstream of the blaCMY-16 starting codon. [27]. The isolates were allocated into four clusters, as demonstrated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).
Table 2. Most frequent AmpC β-lactamases in Proteus species.
Table 2. Most frequent AmpC β-lactamases in Proteus species.
Type of AmpC Substrate profile reference
CMY-16 Penicillins, ESC, monobactams, cephamycins, β-lactam-inhibitor combinatons [23,25,26,27]
CMY-2 Penicillins, ESC, monobactams, cephamycins, β-lactam-inhibitor combinatons [28]
CIT Penicillins, ESC, monobactams, cephamycins, β-lactam-inhibitor combinatons [29]

4. Carbapenemases

P. mirabilis develops resistance to carbapenems due to production of carbapenemases, porin alteration or loss, hyperexpression of efflux pumps or alteration of PBP receptors. Carbapenemases in Proteus spp. emerged recently. The first report originated from Bulgaria in 2019 and described P. mirabilis isolates with chromosomally encoded VIM-1 carbapenemase, embedded in class 1 integron, containing IS26 insertion element. Increased resistance was related to the increased expression of the gene associated with increased gene copy number. The isolates showed variable resistance to carbapenems [30]. NDM was reported from Austria in combination with WEB-1 ESBL. The strain was imported from Bangladesh. IMP variants are the rarest [31]. Recently, OXA-48 with very unusual resistance phenotype was described in nine P. mirabilis in Germany [32]. The isolates demonstrated susceptibility to imipenem and ertapenem and in most cases to piperacillin-tazobactam due to weak hydrolytic activity, which complicates laboratory detection and enables the isolates to be missed in the routine diagnostic laboratories and create a hidden reservoir within hospitals which is a source for dissemination of blaOXA-48 genes bypassing surveillance systems [32]. blaOXA-48 genes were chromosomally encoded unlike those reported in other Enterobacterales. Unlike other Enterobacterales, diffusion of the isolate is consequence of the vertical transmission of related isolates. Three isolates were found to harbour blaOXA-181 genes, related to blaOXA-48, which were encoded on X3 plasmid. In France, 19 P. mirabilis isolates with slightly reduced susceptibility to carbapenems were analyzed and OXA-23 CHDL was found, which is usually associated with Acinetobacter baumannii. Emergence of such clone is worrisome as it could be misidentified as penicillinase producers due to its susceptibility to carbapenems [33]. This enables these isolates to escape laboratory surveillance and to disseminate in the hospitals and community. All 19 isolates were clonally related, but different from OXA-23 negative isolates. An outbreak of OXA-23 was also identified among 21 A. baumannii from Belgium and one isolate was found positive for OXA-58 [34] This indicates spread of CHDL which are typical for A. baumannii among Enterobacterales. OXA-23 encoding genes were located on chromosome while OXA-58 was plasmid-mediated [34]. The MICs of carbapenems are often in the susceptible range and thus the isolates are frequently not identified in the laboratory as carbapenemase producers, creating a potential reservoir for spread of CHDL encoding genes [34]. In addition to blaOXA-23, the strains harboured genes conferring resistance to aminoglycosides (aph(3’’ Ib,, aph(6)-Id), sulphonamides (sul1 and sul2), trimethoprim (dfrA) and chloramphenicol resistance (cat). Unlike A. baumannii, blaOXA-23 genes in P. mirabilis were not preceded by ISAba1 element. This could explain very low carbapenem MICs. An accurate screening method for OXA-23 in P. mirabilis is based on the reduced inhibition zone size around amoxycillin-clavulanate disk (<11mm) and confirmation is usually done by immunochromatographic tests or PCR. In Europe OXA-58 was identified in P. mirabilis from Poland [35].
The β-lactam susceptibility pattern indicated resistance to penicillins (including temocillin), their β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, and carbapenems (with ertapenem, imipenem, and meropenem MICs of 8, 32, and 16 g/ml, respectively) and susceptibility to oxyimino compounds (1, 2). The strain was resistant to fluoroquinolones and chloramphenicol and susceptible to amikacin, gentamicin, tobramycin, co-trimoxazole, and fosfomycin [35].
Class A carbapenaemases are rare in Proteus spp. The first report on KPC-2 harboring P. mirabilis causing bloodstream infections originated from China [36]. BlaKPC-2 gene was located on incN plasmid [36]. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing revealed the strain was resistant to imipenem, meropenem, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ampicillin, ampicillin-sulbactam, cefotaxime, piperacillin, cefazolin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, gentamicin and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim but susceptible to ceftazidime, amikacin, aztreonam and piperacillin-tazobactam. In keeping with its multidrug-resistant profile, P. mirabilis XH983 had a number of ARGs, conferring resistance to aminoglycosides [aph(3')-Ia, aph(3'')-Ib, aph(6)- Id, aac(3)-IId, aadA5, aadA1], β-lactams (blaKPC-2, blaTEM-1B), phenicol (cat, catA1), sulphonamide/trimethoprim (drfA1, drfA17, sul1, sul2), and tetracycline (tet(J). Except in human samples carbapenemase producing P. mirabilis isolates were found in broilers in China [37] reinforcing one health theory.
Coproduction of double carbapenemases (KPC-2 and NDM-1) was reported in Brazil [38]. The isolates harbored a plethora of different virulence gene in addition to blaKPC-2, blaNDM-1 and blaOXA-10.
Table 3. Most frequent carbapenemases in Proteus species.
Table 3. Most frequent carbapenemases in Proteus species.
Type of carbapenemase Substrate profile reference
VIM-1 Penicillins, ESC, carbapenems [30]
NDM-5 Penicillins, ESC, carbapenems [22]
OXA-48 Penicillins, monobactams, carbapenems [32]
OXA-162 Penicillins, monobactams, carbapenems [32]
OXA-181 Penicillins, monobactams, carbapenems [32]
OXA-23 Penicillins, monobactams, carbapenems [33,34]
OXA-58 Penicillins, monobactams, carbapenems [34]

5. Fluoroquinolone Resistance

High level fluoroquinolone resistance in P. mirabilis is usually mediated by mutations in gyrA and parC genes. Low level resistance is in most cases associated with plasmid-mediated qnr genes (qnrA, qnrB, qnrC, qnrD, qnrS). However, recently qnrA6 was found to be chromosomally encoded in P. mirabilis [39].

6. Laboratory Detection of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamases, Plasmid Mediated AmpC β-Lactamases and Carbapenemases in Proteus spp.

Laboratory detection of ESBLs in Proteus species is done by double-disk synergy test according to Jarlier [40], and combined disk test with clavulanic acid (CLSI, 2018).
The augmentation of the inhibition zones of cephalosporin disks of at least 5 mm by clavulanic acid confirmed ESBL production. Screening for p-AmpC beta-lactamases in Proteus spp. is based on reduced susceptibility to cefoxitin.
Confirmation of p-AmpC is carried out by double-disk synergy test with a disk supplemented with 500 µg cloxacillin placed between the disks containing ceftazidime and cefotaxime on a lawn of P. mirabilis isolates with reduced susceptibility to cefoxitin in order to detect p-Amp-C [9]. The distortion of the inhibition zones around ESC disks toward the central disk with cloxacillin was considered a positive result [9]. The other method for confirmation of P-AmpCs is an AmpC disk test according to Black [41]. A blank paper disk is impregnated with 20 µL Tris-EDTA to permeabilize bacterial cells. Three to five colonies of the test organism are applied to the surface of the disk. The disk is placed on the surface of Mueller–Hinton (MH) agar previously inoculated with cefoxitin susceptible E. coli ATCC 25922. The distortion of the inhibition zone around the cefoxitin disk indicated the enzymatic inactivation of cefoxitin [41].
Isolates demonstrating reduced susceptibility to carbapenems are subjected to screening for carbapenemase production by modified Hodge test, CIM (carbapenem-inactivation method) [42], eCIM or CarbaNP test. Isolates suspicious for MBL positivity are tested by imipenem-EDTA inhibitor- based test.
Overnight culture of the carbapenem-resistant test strain is suspended in saline and an ertapenem disk (10 µg) is placed in the suspension which was incubated for 2 hours at 37 °C. As an indicator strain, E. coli ATCC 25922 is inoculated on Mueller–Hinton (MH) agar plates. The disk is removed after 2 h and placed in the middle of the plate. Carbapenem hydrolysis is confirmed if there is no inhibition zone, the zone is smaller than 14 mm or if there are colonies within the inhibition zone [42].
For MHT, an overnight culture of carbapenem-susceptible indicator strain E. coli ATCC 25922 is inoculated on the surface of MacConkey agar plates to avoid swarming. After drying, an ertapenem disk (10 µg) is placed in the middle of the plate. Overnight Proteus cultures are streaked as a single line from the periphery of the disc to the edge of the plate. The plates are incubated overnight at 37 °C. Carbapenemase is suspected if the clover-leaf indentation of the indicator organism was observed toward the ertapenem disc [43].
For imipenem-EDTA inhibitor based test overnight Proteus culture is spread on the MH agar plate. Imipenem and meropenem disks with and without EDTA are placed on the plate. Cultures are incubated overnight at 37 °C. The augmentation of the inhibition zone around the carbapenem disk for at least 7 mm in the presence of EDTA is considered a positive result [44].

7. Therapeutic Options

From the therapeutic point of view, it is important to distinguish between ESBLs and AmpC β-lactamases because infections caused by AmpC positive isolates can be effectively treated with cefepime and cefpirome. On the other hand, uncomplicated urinary tract infections due to ESBL positive organisms can be treated with β-lactam/inhibitor combinations which are not recommended for AmpC producing organisms [45] although our isolates demonstrated in vitro susceptibility to piperacillin/tazobactam. Some authorities recommend all expanded-spectrum cephalosporins to be reported as resistant if the isolate produces plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamase regardless of the in vitro susceptibility results to avoid therapeutic failures [46,47]. CLSI has yet to establish a testing and reporting algorithm specifically for organisms containing AmpC β-lactamases. Identification of AmpC β-lactamases in E. coli, P. mirabilis and Klebsiella spp can increase the accuracy of antimicrobial testing reports for expanded-spectrum cephalosporins if the results were used to modify the interpretations of cephalosporin results [46].
P. mirabilis has intrinsic resistance to colistin, nitrofurantoin and tigecycline which limits therapeutic options.

8. Conclusions

This review demonstrated amazing capacity of Proteus species to acquire various resistance determinant in addition to intrinsic resistance and to develop multidrug or extensively-drug resistance phenotype with a few or no therapeutic options left. Accurate and fast laboratory identification of resistance determinants is mandatory to avoid spread of resistance isolates and hospital outbreaks. Confirmation of genes encoding ESBLs, AmpC β- lactamases and carbapenemases is of high epidemiological relevance order to choose the appropriate therapy for bacterial infections due to multidrug-resistant Proteus species. The same allelic variants of ESBL and p-AmpC genes were found in both human and animal isolates from different geographic areas and continents, reinforcing one health approach. The dominant animal species harbouring ESBL and AmpC positive P. mirabilis are broilers which are food producing animals and can serve as a source of human intestinal colonization. P. mirabilis is an important host organism for CHDL previously identified in A. baumamannii such as OXA-23 and OXA-58, unlike other Enterobacterales, but with much weaker expression, and developing clinically relevant resistance only in the presence of other resistance determinants like porin loss or hyperexpression of efflux systems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.B.; formal analysis, B.B.; M.N.; M.P., B.B., D.B.P.; data curation: M.N.; M.P., B.B., D.B.P.; writing—original draft preparation, B.B, M.P. writing—review and editing, B.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This is review article. No funding was necessary.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

ESBL-extended-spectrum β-lactamases, p-AmpC-plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamases, ESC: expanded-spectrum cephalosporins;CHDL-carbapenem-hydrolyzing class D oxacillinases: MIC-minimum inhibitory concentration; WGS-whole genome sequencing, PFGE-pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

References

  1. Bradford, P.A. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases in the 21st Century: Characterization, Epidemiology, and Detection of This Important Resistance Threat. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2001, 14, 933–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Grover, N.; Sahni, A.K.; Bhattacharya, S. Therapeutic challenges of ESBLS and AmpC beta-lactamase producers in a tertiary care center. Med J Armed Forces India. 2013, 69, 4–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  3. Bush, K. Is it important to identify extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing isolates? Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996, 15, 361–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Li, Y.; Yin, M.; Fang, C.; Fu, Y.; Dai, X.; Zeng, W.; Zhang, L. Genetic analysis of resistance and virulence characteristics of clinical multidrug-resistant Proteus mirabilis isolates. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023, 13, 1229194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  5. Paterson, D.L.; Bonomo, R.A. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases: A clinical update. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2005, 18, 657–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bonnet, R. Growing group of extended-spectrum β-lactamases: The CTX-M enzymes. Antimicrob. Agents. Chemother. 2004, 48, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rossolini, G.M.; D’Andrea, M.M.; Mugnaioli, C. The spread of CTX-M-type extended-spectrum β-lactamases. Clin. Infect. 2008, 14, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cantón, R.; Coque, T.M. ; The CTX-M β-lactamase pandemic. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2006, 9, 466–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jacoby, G.A. AmpC β-lactamases. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2009, 22, 161–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Queenan, A.M.; Bush, K. Carbapenemases: The versatile β-lactamases. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2007, 20, 440–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Canton, R.; Akova, M.; Carmeli, Y.; Giske, C.G.; Glupczynski, Y.; Gniadkowski, M.; et al. Rapid evolution and spread of carbapenemases among Enterobacteriaceae in Europe. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, 413–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Girlich, D.; Bonnin, R. A; Dortet, L; Naas, T. Genetics of Acquired Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Proteus spp. Front Microbiol. 2020, 11, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  13. Robicsek, A.; Jacoby, G.A.; Hooper, D.C. The worldwide emergence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2006, 6, 629–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Perilli, M.; Segatore, B.; De Massis, M.R.; Pagani, L.; Luzzaro, F.; Rossolini, G.M.; et al. Biochemical characterization of TEM-92 extended-spectrum beta-lactamase, a protein differing from TEM-52 in the signal peptide. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002, 46, 3981–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  15. Perilli, M.; Segatore, B.; Mugnaioli, C.; Celenza, G.; Rossolini, G.M.; Stefani, S.; Luzzaro, F.; Pini, B.; Amicosante, G. Persistence of TEM-52/TEM-92 and SHV-12 extended-spectrum β-lactamases in clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae in Italy. Microb Drug Resist. 2011, 17, 521–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Sardelić, S.; Bedenić, B.; Sijak, D.; Colinon, C.; Kalenić, S. Emergence of Proteus mirabilis isolates producing TEM-52 extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in Croatia. Chemotherapy. 2010, 56, 208–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tonkić, M.; Mohar, B.; Šiško-Kraljević, K.; Meško-Meglič, K.; Goić-Barišić, I.; Novak, A. High prevalence and molecular characterization of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Proteus mirabilis strains in southern Croatia. J Med Microbiol. 2010, 59, 1185–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Iabadene, H.; Dallenne, C.; Messai, Y.; Geneste, D.; Bakour, R.; Arlet, G. Emergence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase PER-1 in Proteus vulgaris and Providencia stuartii isolates from Algiers, Algeria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 4043–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  19. Mahrouki, S.; Belhadj, O.; Chihi, H.; Mohamed, B.M.; Celenza, G.; Amicosante, G.; et al. Chromosomal blaCTX-M-₁₅ associated with ISEcp1 in Proteus mirabilis and Morganella morganii isolated at the Military Hospital of Tunis, Tunisia. J Med Microbiol. 2012, 61, 1286–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Karpenko, A.; Shelenkov, A.; Petrova, L.; Gusarov, V.; Zamyatin, M.; Mikhaylova, Y.; Akimin, V. Two multidrug-resistant Proteus mirabilis clones carrying extended spectrum beta-lactamases revealed in a single hospital department by whole genome sequencing. Heliyon. 2024, 29, 40821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Biggel, M.; Boss, S.; Uea-Anuwong, T.; Lugsomya, K.; Magouras, I.; Stephan, R. Complete Genome Sequence of the Extensively Drug-Resistant Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Proteus mirabilis Isolate HK294, Obtained from Poultry Feces in Hong Kong. Microbiol Resour Announc. 2023, 20, e0022523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Valentin, T.; Feierl, G.; Masoud-Landgraf, L.; Kohek, P.; Luxner, J.; Zarfel, G. Proteus mirabilis harboring carbapenemase NDM-5 and ESBL VEB-6 detected in Austria. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018, 91, 284–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. D’Andrea, M.M.; Literacka, E.; Zioga, A.; Giani, T.; Baraniak, A.; Fiett, J. Evolution and spread of multidrug-resistant Proteus mirabilis clone with chromosomal AmpC β-lactamase in Europe. Antimicrob. Agents Chemothe. 2011, 55, 2735–2742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Shaban, M.; Elshaer, S.L.; Abd El-Rahman, O.A. Prevalence of extended-spectrum β-lactamases, AmpC, and carbapenemases in Proteus mirabilis clinical isolates. BMC Microbiol. 2022, 11, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Migliavacca, R.; Migliavacca, A.; Nucleo, E.; Ciaponi, A.; Spalla, M.; De Luca, C.; Pagani, L. Molecular epidemiology of ESBL producing Proteus mirabilis isolates from a long –term care and rehabilitation facility in Italy. New Microbiologica. 2007, 30, 362–366. [Google Scholar]
  26. Bedenić, B.; Firis, N.; Elveđi-Gašparović, V.; Krilanović, M.; Matanović, K.; Štimac, I.; A., *!!! REPLACE !!!*; et al. Emergence of multidrug-resitant Proteus mirabilis in a long-term care facility in Croatia. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2016, 128, 404–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rubic, Z.; Soprek, S.; Jelic, M.; Novak, A.; Goic-Barisic, I.; Radic, M.; Tambić-Andraševć, A; Tonkić, M. Molecular Characterization of β-Lactam Resistance and Antimicrobial Susceptibility to Possible Therapeutic Options of AmpC-Producing Multidrug-Resistant Proteus mirabilis in a University Hospital of Split, Croatia. Microb Drug Resist. 2021, 27, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yang, J.H.; Sheng, W.H.; Hsueh, P.R.; SMART Program. Antimicrobial susceptibility and distribution of extended-spectrum β-lactamases, AmpC β-lactamases and carbapenemases among Proteus, Providencia and Morganella isolated from global hospitalised patients with intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections: Results of the Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART), 2008-2011. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2020, 22, 398–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Santiago, G.S.; Gonçalves, D.; da Silva Coelho, I.; de Mattos de Oliveira Coelho, S.; Neto Ferreira, H. Conjugative plasmidic AmpC detected in Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis and Klebsiella pneumoniae human clinical isolates from Portugal. Braz J Microbiol. 2020, 51, 1807–1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  30. Bontron, S.; Poirel, L.; Kieffer, N.; Savov, E.; Trifonova, A.; Todorova, I.; Kueffer, G.; et al. Increased Resistance to Carbapenems in Proteus mirabilis Mediated by Amplification of the blaVIM-1-Carrying and IS26-Associated Class 1 Integron. Microb Drug Resist. 2019, 25, 663–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Hamprecht, A.; Sattler, J.; Noster, J.; Stelzer, Y.; Fuchs, F.; Dorth, V.; et al. Proteus mirabilis - analysis of a concealed source of carbapenemases and development of a diagnostic algorithm for detection. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2023, 29, 1198.e1–1198.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Sattler, J.; Noster, J.; Stelzer, Y.; Spille, M.; Schäfer, S.; Xanthopoulou, K.; et al. OXA-48-like carbapenemases in Proteus mirabilis - novel genetic environments and a challenge for detection. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2024, 13, 2353310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  33. Potron, A.; Hocquet, D.; Triponney, P.; Plésiat, P.; Bertrand, X.; Valot, B. Carbapenem-Susceptible OXA-23-Producing Proteus mirabilis in the French Community. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019, 63, e00191–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  34. Bonnin, R.A.; Girlich, D.; Jousset, A.B.; Gauthier, L.; Cuzon, G.; Bogaerts, P.; et al. A single Proteus mirabilis lineage from human and animal sources: a hidden reservoir of OXA-23 or OXA-58 carbapenemases in Enterobacterales. Sci Rep. 2020, 10, 9160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  35. Literacka, E.; Izdebski, R.; Baraniak, A.; Żabicka, D.; Schneider, A.; Urbanowicz, P. . Proteus mirabilis Producing the OXA-58 Carbapenemase in Poland. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019, 25, 00106–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sun, L.; He, J.; Shi, X.; Hu, L.; Yin, Y.; Yu, Y.; Hua, X. Genotypic characterization of a Proteus mirabilis strain harboring blaKPC-2 on the IncN plasmid isolated from a patient with bloodstream infection in China. J Infect Public Health. 2023, 16, 1033–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Shen, Z.; Xia, L.; Wang, J.; Zhao, L. Characterization of NDM-1-Producing Carbapenemase in Proteus mirabilis among Broilers in China. Microorganisms. 2021, 26, 2443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Beltrão, E.M.B.; Oliveira, É.M.; Scavuzzi, A.M.L.; Firmo, E.F.; Lopes, A.C.S. Virulence factors of Proteus mirabilis clinical isolates carrying blaKPC-2 and blaNDM-1 and first report blaOXA-10 in Brazil. J Infect Chemother. 2022, 28, 363–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jayol, A.; Janvier, F.; Guillard, T.; Chau, F.; Mérens, A.; Robert, J.; et al. qnrA6 genetic environment and quinolone resistance conferred on Proteus mirabilis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016, 71, 903–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jarlier, V.; Nicolas, M.H.; Fournier, G.; Philippon, A. Extended broad-spectrum beta-lactamases conferring transferable resistance to newer beta-lactam agents in Enterobacteriaceae: Hospital prevalence and susceptibility patterns. Rev. Infect. Dis. 1988, 10, 867–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Black, J.A.; Moland, E.S.; Thomson, K.S. AmpC disk test for detection of plasmid-mediated AmpC beta-lactamases in Enterobacteriaceae lacking chromosomal AmpC β-lactamases. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 3110–3113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. van der Zwaluw, K.; De Haan, A.; Pluister, G.N.; Bootsma, H.J.; de Neeling, A.J. The Carbapenem Inactivation Method (CIM), a simple and low-cost alternative for the carba NP test to assess phenotypic carbapenemase activity in Gram-negative rods. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0123690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Amjad, A.; Mirza, I.; Abbasi, S.; Farwa, U.; Malik, N.; Zia, F. Modified Hodge test: A simple and effective test for detection of carbapenemase production. Iran. J. Microbiol. 2011, 3, 189–193. [Google Scholar]
  44. Lee, K.; Lim, Y.S.; Yong, D.; Yum, J.H.; Chong, Y. Evaluation of the Hodge test and the imipenem-EDTA-double-disk synergy test for differentiating metallo-β-lactamase-producing isolates of Pseudomonas spp. and Acinetobacter spp. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 41, 4623–4629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. McKamey, L.; Venugopalan, V.; Cherabuddi, K.; Borgert, S.; Voils, S.; et al. Assessing antimicrobial stewardship initiatives: Clinical evaluation of cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam in patients with bloodstream infections secondary to AmpC-producing organisms. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2018, 52, 719–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cheng, L.; Nelson, B.C.; Mehta, M.; Seval, N.; Park, S.; Giddin, M.J.; Shi, Q.; Whitter, S.; Gomez Simonds, A.; Uhlemann, A.C. Piperacillin-tazobactam versus other antibacterial agents for treatment of bloodstream infections due to AmpC β-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e00276–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Negri, M.C.; Baquero, F. In vitro selective concentrations of cefepime and ceftazidime for AmpC beta-lactamase hyperproducer Enterobacter cloacae variants. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 1999, 5, S25–S28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated