Submitted:
30 May 2025
Posted:
01 June 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Results
2.1. Isolate Selection and Identification
2.2. Origin of Isolates and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing
2.3. Sequence Types, Resistome, and Plasmid Characterization
2.4. Mutation Analysis
2.4.1. Genes Involved in Iron Metabolism
2.4.2. Penicillin-Binding Proteins (PBPs)
2.4.3. Efflux Pumps
2.4.4. Allelic Variants in Carbapenemases and Class C Beta-lactamases
2.4.5. Porin Loss
2.4.6. Pangenome Analysis
3. Discussion
3.1. Mutations in Genes Related to Iron Transport Systems
3.2. Presence, Mutation, or Overexpression of Specific Beta-lactamases
3.3. Alterations in Penicillin-Binding Proteins (PBPs)
3.4. Alterations in Permeability and Active Efflux
3.5. Pangenome Analysis
4. Materials and Methods
- a)
- Strains belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae family
- b)
- Strains with carbapenemase detection by phenotypic or molecular methods
- a)
- No archived strain available
- b)
- Non-viable archived strain
- c)
- Contaminated archived strain
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Sato, T.; Yamawaki, K. Cefiderocol: Discovery, Chemistry, and In Vivo Profiles of a Novel Siderophore Cephalosporin. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2019, 69 (Suppl. 7), S538–S543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Katsube, T.; Echols, R.; Wajima, T. Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Profiles of Cefiderocol, a Novel Siderophore Cephalosporin. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2019, 69 (Suppl. 7), S552–S558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Price, T.K.; Davar, K.; Contreras, D.; Ward, K.W.; Garner, O.B.; Simner, P.J.; Yang, S.; Chandrasekaran, S. Case Report and Genomic Analysis of Cefiderocol-Resistant Escherichia coli Clinical Isolates. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2022, 157, 257–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haidar, G.; Kline, E.G.; Kitsios, G.D.; Wang, X.; Kwak, E.J.; Newbrough, A.; Friday, K.; Kramer, K.H.; Shields, R.K. Emergence of high-level aztreonam–avibactam and cefiderocol resistance following treatment of an NDM-producing Escherichia coli bloodstream isolate exhibiting reduced susceptibility to both agents at baseline. JAC-Antimicrobial Resist. 2024, 6, dlae141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karakonstantis, S.; Rousaki, M.; Kritsotakis, E.I. Cefiderocol: Systematic Review of Mechanisms of Resistance, Heteroresistance and In Vivo Emergence of Resistance. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wunderink, R.G.; Matsunaga, Y.; Ariyasu, M.; Clevenbergh, P.; Echols, R.; Kaye, K.S.; Kollef, M.; Menon, A.; Pogue, J.M.; Shorr, A.F.; et al. Cefiderocol versus high-dose, extended-infusion meropenem for the treatment of Gram-negative nosocomial pneumonia (APEKS-NP): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 213–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bassetti, M.; Echols, R.; Matsunaga, Y.; Ariyasu, M.; Doi, Y.; Ferrer, R.; Lodise, T.P.; Naas, T.; Niki, Y.; Paterson, D.L.; et al. Efficacy and safety of cefiderocol or best available therapy for the treatment of serious infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CREDIBLE-CR): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, pathogen-focused, descriptive, phase 3 trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 226–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- lvarez-Lerma F, Catalán-González M, Álvarez J, Sánchez-García M, Palomar-Martínez M, Fernández-Moreno I, et al. Impact of the “Zero Resistance” program on acquisition of multidrug-resistant bacteria in patients admitted to Intensive Care Units in Spain. A prospective, intervention, multimodal, multicenter study. Med Intensiva Engl Ed. 2023 Apr;47(4):193–202.
- Ambler, R. The structure of b-lactamases. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 16(289):321–31.
- Guerois, R.; Nielsen, J.E.; Serrano, L. Predicting Changes in the Stability of Proteins and Protein Complexes: A Study of More Than 1000 Mutations. J. Mol. Biol. 2002, 320, 369–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang X, Xie Y, Zhang Y, Lei T, Zhou L, Yao J, et al. Evolution of ceftazidime–avibactam resistance driven by mutations in double-copy blaKPC-2 to blaKPC-189 during treatment of ST11 carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Dong X, editor. mSystems. 2024 Oct 22;9(10):e00722-24.
- Endimiani, A.; Doi, Y.; Bethel, C.R.; Taracila, M.; Adams-Haduch, J.M.; O’keefe, A.; Hujer, A.M.; Paterson, D.L.; Skalweit, M.J.; Page, M.G.P.; et al. Enhancing Resistance to Cephalosporins in Class C β-Lactamases: Impact of Gly214Glu in CMY-2. Biochemistry 2010, 49, 1014–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nordmann, P.; Shields, R.K.; Doi, Y.; Takemura, M.; Echols, R.; Matsunaga, Y.; Yamano, Y. Mechanisms of Reduced Susceptibility to Cefiderocol Among Isolates from the CREDIBLE-CR and APEKS-NP Clinical Trials. Microb. Drug Resist. 2022, 28, 398–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacoby, GA. AmpC β-Lactamases. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2009 Jan;22(1):161–82.
- Dey, S.; Gaur, M.; Sykes, E.M.E.; Prusty, M.; Elangovan, S.; Dixit, S.; Pati, S.; Kumar, A.; Subudhi, E. Unravelling the Evolutionary Dynamics of High-Risk Klebsiella pneumoniae ST147 Clones: Insights from Comparative Pangenome Analysis. Genes 2023, 14, 1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bianconi, I.; Spath, M.; Aschbacher, R.; Pedron, R.; Wieser, S.; Pagani, E. Characterization of Verona Integron-Encoded Metallo-β-Lactamase-Type Carbapenemase-Producing Escherichia coli Isolates Collected over a 16-Year Period in Bolzano (Northern Italy). Microb. Drug Resist. 2023, 30, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Spapen, H.; Jacobs, R.; Van Gorp, V.; Troubleyn, J.; Honoré, P.M. Renal and neurological side effects of colistin in critically ill patients. Ann. Intensiv. Care 2011, 1, 14–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, D.; Park, B.Y.; Choi, M.H.; Yoon, E.-J.; Lee, H.; Lee, K.J.; Park, Y.S.; Shin, J.H.; Uh, Y.; Shin, K.S.; et al. Antimicrobial resistance and virulence factors of Klebsiella pneumoniae affecting 30 day mortality in patients with bloodstream infection. J Antimicrob Chemother [Internet]. 2018 Oct 5 [cited 2024 Nov 23]; Available from: https://academic.oup.com/jac/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jac/dky397/5116214.
- Bianco, G.; Boattini, M.; Cricca, M.; Diella, L.; Gatti, M.; Rossi, L.; Bartoletti, M.; Sambri, V.; Signoretto, C.; Fonnesu, R.; et al. Updates on the Activity, Efficacy and Emerging Mechanisms of Resistance to Cefiderocol. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024, 46, 14132–14153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Padovani, M.; Bertelli, A.; Corbellini, S.; Piccinelli, G.; Gurrieri, F.; De Francesco, M.A. In Vitro Activity of Cefiderocol on Multiresistant Bacterial Strains and Genomic Analysis of Two Cefiderocol Resistant Strains. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bao, J.; Xie, L.; Ma, Y.; An, R.; Gu, B.; Wang, C. Proteomic and Transcriptomic Analyses Indicate Reduced Biofilm-Forming Abilities in Cefiderocol-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 778190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nurjadi, D.; Kocer, K.; Chanthalangsy, Q.; Klein, S.; Heeg, K.; Boutin, S. New Delhi Metallo-Beta-Lactamase Facilitates the Emergence of Cefiderocol Resistance in Enterobacter cloacae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2021, 66, e0201121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McElheny, C.L.; Fowler, E.L.; Iovleva, A.; Shields, R.K.; Doi, Y. In Vitro Evolution of Cefiderocol Resistance in an NDM-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Due to Functional Loss of CirA. Microbiol. Spectr. 2021, 9, e0177921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ito A, Sato T, Ota M, Takemura M, Nishikawa T, Toba S, et al. In Vitro Antibacterial Properties of Cefiderocol, a Novel Siderophore Cephalosporin, against Gram-Negative Bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Jan;62(1):e01454-17.
- Klein, S.; Boutin, S.; Kocer, K.; O Fiedler, M.; Störzinger, D.; A Weigand, M.; Tan, B.; Richter, D.; Rupp, C.; Mieth, M.; et al. Rapid Development of Cefiderocol Resistance in Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter cloacae During Therapy Is Associated With Heterogeneous Mutations in the Catecholate Siderophore Receptor cirA. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2022, 74, 905–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Govers, S.K.; Mortier, J.; Adam, A.; Aertsen, A. Protein aggregates encode epigenetic memory of stressful encounters in individual Escherichia coli cells. PLOS Biol. 2018, 16, e2003853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chu, B.C.; Garcia-Herrero, A.; Johanson, T.H.; Krewulak, K.D.; Lau, C.K.; Peacock, R.S.; Slavinskaya, Z.; Vogel, H.J. Siderophore uptake in bacteria and the battle for iron with the host; a bird’s eye view. BioMetals 2010, 23, 601–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mushtaq S, Sadouki Z, Vickers A, Livermore DM, Woodford N. In Vitro Activity of Cefiderocol, a Siderophore Cephalosporin, against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 Nov 17;64(12):e01582-20.
- Hackel, M.A.; Tsuji, M.; Yamano, Y.; Echols, R.; Karlowsky, J.A.; Sahm, D.F. In Vitro Activity of the Siderophore Cephalosporin, Cefiderocol, against Carbapenem-Nonsusceptible and Multidrug-Resistant Isolates of Gram-Negative Bacilli Collected Worldwide in 2014 to 2016. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Longshaw, C.; Manissero, D.; Tsuji, M.; Echols, R.; Yamano, Y. In vitroactivity of the siderophore cephalosporin, cefiderocol, against molecularly characterized, carbapenem-non-susceptible Gram-negative bacteria from Europe. JAC-Antimicrobial Resist. 2020, 2, dlaa060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tristancho-Baró, A.; Franco-Fobe, L.E.; Ariza, M.P.; Milagro, A.; López-Calleja, A.I.; Fortuño, B.; López, C.; Latorre-Millán, M.; Clusa, L.; Martínez, R.; et al. Genomic Characterization of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae from Clinical and Epidemiological Human Samples. Antibiotics 2025, 14, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Poirel, L.; Sadek, M.; Kusaksizoglu, A.; Nordmann, P. Co-resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol in clinical isolates producing KPC variants. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2022, 41, 677–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tiseo G, Falcone M, Leonildi A, Giordano C, Barnini S, Arcari G, et al. Meropenem-Vaborbactam as Salvage Therapy for Ceftazidime-Avibactam-, Cefiderocol-Resistant ST-512 Klebsiella pneumoniae –Producing KPC-31, a D179Y Variant of KPC-3. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Jun 1;8(6):ofab141.
- Jacob, A.-S.; Chong, G.-L.; Lagrou, K.; Depypere, M.; Desmet, S. No in vitro activity of cefiderocol against OXA-427-producing Enterobacterales. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2021, 76, 3317–3318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sato, T.; Ito, A.; Ishioka, Y.; Matsumoto, S.; Rokushima, M.; Kazmierczak, K.M.; Hackel, M.; Sahm, D.F.; Yamano, Y. Escherichia coli strains possessing a four amino acid YRIN insertion in PBP3 identified as part of the SIDERO-WT-2014 surveillance study. JAC-Antimicrobial Resist. 2020, 2, dlaa081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simner, P.J.; Beisken, S.; Bergman, Y.; Ante, M.; Posch, A.E.; Tamma, P.D. Defining Baseline Mechanisms of Cefiderocol Resistance in the Enterobacterales. Microb. Drug Resist. 2022, 28, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- David, S.; Wong, J.L.C.; Sanchez-Garrido, J.; Kwong, H.-S.; Low, W.W.; Morecchiato, F.; Giani, T.; Rossolini, G.M.; Brett, S.J.; Clements, A.; et al. Widespread emergence of OmpK36 loop 3 insertions among multidrug-resistant clones of Klebsiella pneumoniae. PLOS Pathog. 2022, 18, e1010334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Padilla, E.; Llobet, E.; Doménech-Sánchez, A.; Martínez-Martínez, L.; Bengoechea, J.A.; Albertí, S. Klebsiella pneumoniae AcrAB Efflux Pump Contributes to Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mosquera-Rendón, J.; Moreno-Herrera, C.X.; Robledo, J.; Hurtado-Páez, U. Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) Approaches for the Detection of Genetic Variants Associated with Antibiotic Resistance: A Systematic Review. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 2866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint Tables for Interpretation of MICs and Zone Diameters, Version 15 [Internet]. 2025. Available online: http://www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints (accessed on 1 January 2020).
- Wick, R.R.; Judd, L.M.; Gorrie, C.L.; Holt, K.E. Unicycler: Resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2017, 13, e1005595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gurevich, A.; Saveliev, V.; Vyahhi, N.; Tesler, G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 1072–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seppey M, Manni M, Zdobnov EM. BUSCO: Assessing Genome Assembly and Annotation Completeness. In: Kollmar M, editor. Gene Prediction [Internet]. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2019 [cited 2024 Nov 24]. p. 227–45. (Methods in Molecular Biology; vol. 1962). Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4939-9173-0_14.
- Ondov, B.D.; Starrett, G.J.; Sappington, A.; Kostic, A.; Koren, S.; Buck, C.B.; Phillippy, A.M. Mash Screen: high-throughput sequence containment estimation for genome discovery. Genome Biol. 2019, 20, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Orakov A, Fullam A, Coelho LP, Khedkar S, Szklarczyk D, Mende DR, et al. GUNC: detection of chimerism and contamination in prokaryotic genomes. Genome Biol. 2021 Dec;22(1):178.
- Wick, R.R.; Schultz, M.B.; Zobel, J.; Holt, K.E. Bandage: interactive visualization of de novo genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 3350–3352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lumpe, J.; Gumbleton, L.; Gorzalski, A.; Libuit, K.; Varghese, V.; Lloyd, T.; Tadros, F.; Arsimendi, T.; Wagner, E.; Stephens, C.; et al. GAMBIT (Genomic Approximation Method for Bacterial Identification and Tracking): A methodology to rapidly leverage whole genome sequencing of bacterial isolates for clinical identification. PLOS ONE 2023, 18, e0277575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jolley, K.A.; Bray, J.E.; Maiden, M.C.J. Open-access bacterial population genomics: BIGSdb software, the PubMLST.org website and their applications. Wellcome Open Res. 2018, 3, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seeman, T. MLST; GitHub: San Francisco, CA, USA. Available online: https://github.com/tseemann/mlst (accessed on 25 June 2020).
- Lam, M.M.C.; Wick, R.R.; Watts, S.C.; Cerdeira, L.T.; Wyres, K.L.; Holt, K.E. A genomic surveillance framework and genotyping tool for Klebsiella pneumoniae and its related species complex. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seemann, T. Prokka: Rapid Prokaryotic Genome Annotation. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2068–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casimiro-Soriguer, C.S.; Muñoz-Mérida, A.; Pérez-Pulido, A.J. Sma3s: A universal tool for easy functional annotation of proteomes and transcriptomes. Proteomics 2017, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alcock, B.P.; Huynh, W.; Chalil, R.; Smith, K.W.; Raphenya, A.R.; A Wlodarski, M.; Edalatmand, A.; Petkau, A.; A Syed, S.; Tsang, K.K.; et al. CARD 2023: expanded curation, support for machine learning, and resistome prediction at the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, D690–D699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Robertson, J.; Nash, J.H.E. MOB-suite: software tools for clustering, reconstruction and typing of plasmids from draft assemblies. Microb. Genom. 2018, 4, e000206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Page, A.J.; Cummins, C.A.; Hunt, M.; Wong, V.K.; Reuter, S.; Holden, M.T.G.; Fookes, M.; Falush, D.; Keane, J.A.; Parkhill, J. Roary: Rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 3691–3693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brynildsrud O, Bohlin J, Scheffer L, Eldholm V. Rapid scoring of genes in microbial pan-genome-wide association studies with Scoary. Genome Biol. 2016 Dec;17(1):238.
- Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: Improvements in Performance and Usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Price, M.N.; Dehal, P.S.; Arkin, A.P. FastTree 2—Approximately Maximum-Likelihood Trees for Large Alignments. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e9490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Battistuzzi FU, editor. Mol Biol Evol. 2021 Jun 25;38(7):3022–7.
- Seemann, T.; Snippy: Rapid Haploid Variant Calling and Core Genome Alignment. GitHub. 2020. Available online: https://github.com/tseemann/snippy (accessed on 10 February 2020).
- Cingolani, P.; Platts, A.; Wang, L.L.; Coon, M.; Nguyen, T.; Wang, L.; Land, S.J.; Lu, X.; Ruden, D.M. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff. Fly 2012, 6, 80–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schymkowitz, J.; Borg, J.; Stricher, F.; Nys, R.; Rousseau, F.; Serrano, L. The FoldX web server: an online force field. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, W382–W388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]




| sample_name | CFD_profile | sample_type | sepecies_name | ST | Carbapenemase | ESBL | ampC | other_betalactamases | plasmid_size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CF1313021 | R | Triple-swab | Citrobacter portucalensis | 1129 | NDM-1 | 0 | CMY-13 | 0 | - |
| EC1096797 | R | Triple-swab | Escherichia coli | 167 | NDM-1;OXA-244 | CTX-M-15 | EC-15 | TEM-1 | 219582 |
| EC1151567 | R | Triple-swab | Escherichia coli | 361 | NDM-5;KPC-3 | CTX-M-15 | CMY-145 | OXA-1;SHV-11;TEM-1 | 78194 |
| EC1242016 | R | Rectal swab | Escherichia coli | 38 | NDM-1 | CTX-M-15 | CMY-16; EC-8 | OXA-1; OXA-10 | 246852 |
| EC1242191 | R | Triple-swab | Escherichia coli | 131 | OXA-48 | CTX-M-163 | CMY-181 | OXA-1;TEM-1 | 4388 |
| EC673020 | R | Surgical wound | Escherichia coli | 2659 | NDM-5 | 0 | CMY-42; EC-8 | TEM-1 | 120117 |
| EC761716 | R | Urine | Escherichia coli | 2659 | NDM-5 | 0 | CMY-42; EC-8 | TEM-1 | 119390 |
| EC782935 | R | Triple-swab | Escherichia coli | 410 | OXA-181 | 0 | CMY-4; EC-14 | OXA-1 | 27916 |
| EC901482 | R | Urine | Escherichia coli | 167 | NDM-1;OXA-244 | CTX-M-15 | EC-15 | TEM-1 | 201947 |
| EC944575 | R | Triple-swab | Escherichia coli | 405 | NDM-5 | CTX-M-55 | EC-8 | OXA-1;TEM-1 | 79499 |
| EE1280220 | R | Triple-swab | Enterobacter hormaechei | 108 | OXA-181 | 0 | ACT-55 | 0 | 49839 |
| EE1332654 | R | Urine | Enterobacter kobei | 191 | VIM-1 | 0 | ACT-52 | 0 | 96969 |
| EE1338763 | R | Ascitic fluid | Enterobacter asburiae | 702 | OXA-48 | 0 | MIR-3 | 0 | - |
| EE974926 | R | Wound | Enterobacter hormaechei | 51 | KPC-3 | 0 | ACT-40 | TEM-1 | 50662 |
| KP1059745 | R | Triple-swab | Klebsiella pneumoniae | 307 | KPC-2;NDM-1 | 0 | 0 | SHV-28 | 95182 |
| KP1067518 | R | Rectal swab | Klebsiella pneumoniae | 23 | NDM-1;OXA-48 | CTX-M-55 | 0 | SHV-1 | 6690 |
| KP1207364 | R | Triple-swab | Klebsiella pneumoniae | 101 | KPC-3 | 0 | 0 | SHV-1 | 15430 |
| KP1207896 | R | Wound | Klebsiella pneumoniae | 395 | NDM-1;OXA-48 | 0 | CMY-6 | SHV-11 | 353883 |
| KP1207904 | R | Triple-swab | Klebsiella pneumoniae | 512 | KPC-3 | 0 | 0 | SHV-11 | - |
| KP1215397 | R | Surgical wound | Klebsiella pneumoniae | 392 | NDM-1 | CTX-M-15 | 0 | SHV-11;TEM-1 | 342552 |
| KP1234533 | R | Urine | Klebsiella pneumoniae | 395 | NDM-1;OXA-48 | CTX-M-15 | 0 | OXA-1;SHV-1;TEM-257 | 339223 |
| KP1268564 | R | Absces | Klebsiella pneumoniae | 14 | VIM-1 | 0 | 0 | SHV-1 | 76734 |
| KP1307832 | R | Urine | Klebsiella pneumoniae | 11 | KPC-3 | 0 | 0 | OXA-1;SHV-11 | - |
| KP944560 | R | Triple-swab | Klebsiella pneumoniae | 23 | NDM-1;OXA-48 | CTX-M-55 | 0 | SHV-1 | 6690 |
| KP944575 | R | Triple-swab | Klebsiella pneumoniae | 405 | NDM-1 | CTX-M-15 | 0 | OXA-1;SHV-28; TEM-1D.v1 | 342981 |
| KP953369 | R | Triple-swab | Klebsiella pneumoniae | 147 | NDM-1;OXA-48 | CTX-M-15 | 0 | OXA-1; OXA-9;SHV-1 | 99331 |
| KP971943 | R | Triple-swab | Klebsiella pneumoniae | 395 | NDM-1 | CTX-M-15 | 0 | OXA-1;SHV-11 35Q; TEM-1 | 338915 |
| KP985068 | R | Surgical wound | Klebsiella pneumoniae | 512 | KPC-3 | 0 | 0 | SHV-11 35Q | 48542 |
| PS965060 | R | Urine | Providencia stuartii | 405 | NDM-5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8145 |
| CF775268 | S | Rectal swab | Citrobacter portucalensis | 493 | VIM-1 | CTX-M-9 | CMY-2 | OXA-1 | 38065 |
| CK1116243 | S | Rectal swab | Citrobacter koseri | 937 | VIM-24 | CTX-M-9 | CKO-1 | OXA-1 | 290040 |
| EC1023956 | S | Rectal swab | Escherichia coli | 29 | VIM-1 | 0 | EC-14 | TEM-1 | 7717 |
| EC1024606 | S | Rectal swab | Escherichia coli | 539 | VIM-1 | 0 | EC-18 | 0 | 115372 |
| EC1197488 | S | Triple-swab | Escherichia coli | 409 | KPC-3 | 0 | EC-15 | SHV-11 | 52472 |
| EC1233581 | S | Urine | Escherichia coli | 602 | NDM-5 | CTX-M-15 | EC-15 | TEM-1 | 41112 |
| EC863253 | S | Rectal swab | Escherichia coli | 327 | VIM-1 | 0 | EC-14 | 0 | 24538 |
| EE1274028 | S | Rectal swab | Enterobacter hormaechei | 45 | VIM-1 | 0 | 0 | SHV-12;TEM-1 | 87234 |
| EE1318769 | S | Rectal swab | Enterobacter hormaechei | 90 | VIM-24 | CTX-M-9 | ACT-56 | OXA-1 | 320344 |
| KP1045007 | S | Rectal swab | Klebsiella variicola | 4365 | VIM-24 | CTX-M-9 | 0 | OXA-1;LEN-16 | 289821 |
| KP1096796 | S | Triple-swab | Klebsiella pneumoniae | 147 | NDM-1;OXA-48 | CTX-M-15 | 0 | OXA-1; OXA-9;SHV-1; TEM-1 | 112847 |
| KP1096799 | S | Triple-swab | Klebsiella pneumoniae | 147 | NDM-1;OXA-48 | CTX-M-15 | 0 | OXA-1; OXA-9;SHV-1; TEM-150 | 49214 |
| KP1131939 | S | Surgical wound | Klebsiella pneumoniae | 3817 | VIM-1 | 0 | DHA-1 | SHV-1 | 99583 |
| KP1156073 | S | Urine | Klebsiella pneumoniae | 15 | OXA-48 | CTX-M-15 | 0 | OXA-1;SHV-28;TEM-1 | 61487 |
| KP1174934 | S | Prosthetics | Klebsiella pneumoniae | 395 | OXA-48 | CTX-M-15;CTX-M14 | 0 | SHV-11;TEM-1 | 74983 |
| KP1216215 | S | Urine | Klebsiella pneumoniae | 9 | VIM-1 | 0 | 0 | SHV-161 | 12291 |
| KP1255048 | S | Otic swab | Klebsiella pneumoniae | 395 | NDM-1;OXA-48 | CTX-M-15 | 0 | OXA-1;SHV-11;TEM-1 | 360587 |
| KP1289033 | S | Urine | Klebsiella pneumoniae | 307 | NDM-1 | 0 | 0 | SHV-28 | - |
| KP1348849 | S | Triple-swab | Klebsiella pneumoniae | 20 | VIM-1 | 0 | 0 | SHV-187 | 228345 |
| KP822390 | S | Triple-swab | Klebsiella pneumoniae | 147 | NDM-1 | CTX-M-15 | 0 | OXA-1; OXA-9;SHV-1; TEM-150 | 95085 |
| KP838840 | S | Blood culture | Klebsiella pneumoniae | 4387 | VIM-1 | 0 | 0 | SHV-1 | 71759 |
| KP844839 | S | Surgical wound | Klebsiella pneumoniae | 395 | NDM-1;OXA-48 | CTX-M-15 | 0 | OXA-1;SHV-1; TEM-105 | 338557 |
| KP846745 | S | Rectal swab | Klebsiella pneumoniae | 147 | NDM-1;OXA-48 | CTX-M-15 | 0 | OXA-1; OXA-9;SHV-1; TEM-150 | 99417 |
| KP882410 | S | Triple-swab | Klebsiella pneumoniae | 307 | NDM-1 | CTX-M-15 | 0 | OXA-1;SHV-28; TEM-1 | 337324 |
| KP896137 | S | Rectal swab | Klebsiella pneumoniae | 584 | VIM-1 | 0 | 0 | OXA-1;SHV-168 | 61936 |
| KP932969 | S | Rectal swab | Klebsiella pneumoniae | 268 | VIM-1 | 0 | DHA-1 | SHV-1; DHA-1 | 80393 |
| MM1207184 | S | Skin ulcer | Morganella morganii | - | NDM-1 | CTX-M-15 | 0 | TEM-1 | 179934 |
| PR1307361 | S | Urine | Providencia hangzhouensis | 44 | NDM-1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| PS1207364 | S | Triple-swab | Providencia stuartii | 11 | NDM-5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| SM1131939 | S | Wound | Serratia sarumanii | 522 | VIM-1 | 0 | SRT-2 | 0 | 12354 |
| Resistance mechanism | Locus | Amino acid variant |
|---|---|---|
| Iron metabolism | cirA | D95G, E465D, E507fs, I174V, I547F, I547L, R514fs |
| fecB | A134T, A214S, D55Y, I57S, L8V, T23M | |
| fes | A143T, A189V, A264D, A272G, A327T, D99V, E192G, E329Q, EY42GH (complex), H293N, I163T, I163T (complex), I343V, I362L, I53V, K177N, K324Q, K324Q(complex), L130P, L261Q, N75D (complex), P164A, Q222R, Q316H, Q66R, R174W, R350Q, T186I, T45A, T45P, T80K, V104A, V214A (complex), V30I, V320M, V51I, V56M | |
| fhuC | A122V, A72T, E239D, E67A, L70I, M100L, S188A, S188A (complex), S64T | |
| fhuF | A127V, A208T, A64T, C214Y, D176G, E119Q, E144D, H155Q, I179N, K149R, K35E, L214I, L55Q, M83T, P52L, P63T, PT23AG (complex), QDPT21HDAG (complex), R126C, S153A, S163R, SQ58TE (complex), T219M, V12I, V135A, V135A (complex), V65A | |
| fiu | A417T, D70N, G388A, M513V, Q58K, R212H, S389A, T367A, T38A, T493A, T493A (complex), V211A, V235I, V495M, V630M, Y274F | |
| nfeF | A172V, A237T, D107E, DG107ED (complex), G113C, G113S, N179H, P61S, P81S, Q119K, R156C, R24H, T4S, V25A, Y240F | |
| PBP | dacB | A121T, K112R, L136F, P182Q, R228S, T269A, V18I |
| ftsI | A233T, E349K, I332V, I532L, Q227H | |
| mrcA | A373V, G414D, R711H, S497G | |
| mrcB | D765N, H604N, R556C | |
| mrdA | A530S, D354N | |
| Efflux pumps | TolC | E230D, G243D, I354L, I3M, L8I, M5I, N212D, N28S, N31S, N436S, Q167K, Q169K, Q356R, Q429L, R289S, S124G, S313A, T61R, V165I, V328I, V49A, LA30QT (complex) |
| acrA | E142D, L147Q, M334T, S122A, S73N, T104A, T379K | |
| acrB | H596N, K1035N, S1043N | |
| acrD | A28T, A696T, D308E, I841V, K652E, L230V, N248D, N74D, N793S, S804T, T851A, V1026I, V575I | |
| acrE | D327N, N103S, N77S, P302S, Q260P, R167H, T382F, T382S | |
| acrF | A24V, E429D, H338Q, K428R, K849Q, S806A | |
| acrR | A117T, A145S, A146T, A163T, A183T, A20D, A45V, A7T, A80T, D11E, D157V, E186T, E196D, E79D, E91A, F38L, G115S, G168C, G78S, K193Q, K56R, L58V, N130S, P206L, P216S, Q139H, Q141K, Q191K, Q64H, R135H, R13C, R176K, R23K, R62C, R9H, S116N, S120Y, S184T, S85P, T183A, T54N, T73A, V101A, Ala47fs, K80fs, L101fs, L109fs, V29fs, QS152RT (complex), LS212HN, TN213IT, Q122* | |
| oqxB | A203T, A851V, D1046E, N798S, FA550IV | |
| tolC | A233T, E205Q, I280V, K139N, L108M, N137Q, N489T, S467G, S476P, T483A | |
| Betalactamases | blaEC-14 | Q23K, R248C, H312R, A367T |
| blaEC-15 | Q23K, P110S, A367T | |
| blaEC-8 | T4M, D140E, N201T, P209S, S298I, T321A, T367A | |
| blaACT-55 | V311dup | |
| Porin loss | OmpK36 | TD134ins |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).