Submitted:
16 January 2025
Posted:
17 January 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Objects of Research and Methodology of Experimentation
2.2. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Effect of Cuttings Size and Container Volume, Genotype on the Height of Annual Seedlings Obtained by Cuttings
3.2. Effect of Cuttings Size and Container Volume, Genotype on the Diameter of Annual Seedlings Produced by Cuttings
3.3. Effect of Cuttings Size and Container Volume, Genotype on Biological Productivity (Biomass) of Annual Seedlings Obtained by Cuttings
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Financing
Author Contributions
Acknowledgements
Conflict of interest
References
- Forests will help fight climate change https://news.un.org/ru/story/2019/05/1354972.
- Hannay Juliet New study finds global forest area per capita has decreased by over 60 % ] https://www.ffpri.affrc.go.jp/press/2023/20230221-02/documents/20230221-02press.pdf.
- FAO. 2020. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020 – Key findings. Rome. [CrossRef]
- Kotz, M.; Levermann, A.; Wenz, L. The economic commitment of climate change. Nature 2024, 628, 551–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sicard, P.; Augustaitis, A.; Belyazid, S.; Calfapietra, C.; De Marco, A.; Fenn, M.E.; Bytnerowicz, A.; Grulke, N.E.; He, S.; Matyssek, R.; et al. Global topics and novel approaches in the study of air pollution, climate change and forest ecosystems. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 213, 977–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pollastrini, M.; Puletti, N.; Selvi, F.; Iacopetti, G.; Bussotti, F. Widespread Crown Defoliation After a Drought and Heat Wave in the Forests of Tuscany (Central Italy) and Their Recovery—A Case Study From Summer 2017. Front. For. Glob. Chang. 2019, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pliura, A.; Jankauskiene, J.; Lygis, V.; Suchockas, V.; Bajerkevičiene, G.; Verbylaite, R. Response of juvenile progeny of seven forest tree species and their populations to simulated climate change-related stressors, heat, elevated humidity and drought. iForest - Biogeosciences For. 2018, 11, 374–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gudynaitė-Franckevičienė, V.; Pliūra, A.; Suchockas, V. Ecogenetic plasticity and genetic variation in Populus hybrids under the impact of simulated climate change related stressors. Balt. For. 2020, 26, 157–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grossnickle, S.C.; Ivetić, V. Direct Seeding in Reforestation – A Field Performance Review. Reforesta 2017, 94–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, A.; Husain, M.; Ali, S.R. EFFECT OF CONTAINER TYPE AND GROWING MEDIA ON GERMINATION AND SEEDLING GROWTH PARAMETERS AT NURSERY STAGE IN ALLEPO PINE IN KASHMIR VALLEY, INDIA. Flora Fauna 2018, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luoranen, J.; Rikala, R.; Smolander, H. Root Egress and Field Performance of Actively Growing Betula pendula Container Seedlings. Scand. J. For. Res. 2003, 18, 133–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simpson, D.G. Growing Density and Container Volume Affect Nursery and Field Growth of Interior Spruce Seedlings. North. J. Appl. For. 1991, 8, 160–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blonskaya, L.; Sultanova, R.; Muftakhova, S.; Martynova, M.; Konashova, S.; Sabirzyanov, I.; Odintsov, G. Biological indices of Bashkir Lombardy poplar (Populus nigra L. × Populus nigra var. italica Du Roi) in urban landscapes. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 2019, 25 (Suppl. S2), 30–36.
- Tsarev, A.P. Selection and variety testing of poplars : a monograph / under the general editorship of A.P. Tsarev / A.P. Tsarev, Y.V. Plugatar, R.P. Tsareva.- Simferopol : IT ‘ARIAL’, 2019. - 252 p.
- Tsarev A., P. New intersectional hybrids of true poplars Eupopulus L. Tsarev A. P., Tsareva R. P., Tsarev V. A., Myakotnikova E. A., Momot R. V. Forest Engineering Journal 2023.-#1.- P. 5-22.
- The Growth Course of Neva Poplar (Populus х newesis Bogd.) and Californian Poplar (Populus trichocarpa Torr. et Gray) in the European North of Russia N.A. Demidova, S.V. The Growth Course of Neva Poplar (Populus х newesis Bogd.) and Californian Poplar (Populus trichocarpa Torr. et Gray) in the European North of Russia N.A. Demidova, S.V. Yaroslavtsev, T.M. Durkina, I.V. Fedotov, A.S. Il’intsev Леснoй журнал. 2016. № 3. – 77-86.
- Chong, G.W.; Simonson, S.E.; Stohlgren, T.J.; Kalkhan, M.A. Biodiversity: Aspen stands have the lead, but will nonnative species take over. In Sustaining Aspen in Western Landscapes: Symposium; US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station: Fort Collins, CO, USA, 2001; p. 261. [Google Scholar]
- Evlakov, P. M. Advanced technology in the area of the pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.) containerized seedlings growing / P. M. Evlakov, L. A. Ryazantseva, O. M. Korchagin. – Text: direct // Proceedings of the International Conference on Plant Biology and Biotechnology. - Almaty: IIBR, 2014. - P. 163.
- Evlakov, P.M. , Tsarev A.P., Tsareva R.P., Rzhevsky S.G., Zapletin V. // IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 226 012018. [19].
- Heimann, L.; Horst, I.; Perduns, R.; Dreesen, B.; Offermann, S.; Peterhansel, C. A Common Histone Modification Code on C4 Genes in Maize and Its Conservation in Sorghum and Setaria italica. Plant Physiol. 2013, 162, 456–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boruszewski, P.; Laskowska, A.; Jankowska, A.; Klisz, M.; Mionskowski, M. Potential Areas in Poland for Forestry Plantation. Forests 2021, 12, 1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsaryov, A.; Tsaryova, R.; Tsaryov, V.; Tseplyaev, A.; Tregubov, O.; Laktionov, A.; Mizin, Y.; Miligula, Y.; Pokhvalenko, V.; Voronezh State Forestry University named after G.F., Morozov; et al. ROOTABILITY OF POPLAR STEM CUTTINGS AND HEIGHT OF 1-YEAR-OLD SEEDLINGS USING VARIOUS CULTIVATION METHODS. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bakulin, V.T. Black poplar in Western Siberia. Novosibirsk: Academic Publishing House ‘Geo’, 2007.- 121 p. ISBN 978-5-9747-0068-2.
- Dickmann, D.I. An overview of the genus Populus. In Poplar Culture in North America, (Part A); NRC Research Press: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2001; 397p. [Google Scholar]
- De Rigo, D.; Enescu, C.M.; Houston Durrant, T.; Caudullo, G. Populus nigra in Europe: Distribution, habitat, usage and threats. In European Atlas of Forest Tree Species; Publ. Off. EU: Luxembourg, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Demeritt, Maurice E., Jr. 1981. Growth of hybrid poplars in Pennsylvania and Maryland clonal tests. USDA Forest Service, Research Note NE-302. Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Bromall, PA. 2 p.
- Shortle, W.C. Compartmentalization of Decay in Red Maple and Hybrid Poplar Trees. Phytopathology® 1979, 69, 410–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhigunov, A. V. Production of planting material in forest nurseries of North-West Russia: practical recommendations / A.V. Zhigunov, I.A. Markova. - Saint-Petersburg : 2005. - 120 p.
- Burtsev, D. S. Development of research in the field of improving the technology of growing planting material with a closed root system in the St. Petersburg Research Institute of Forestry / D. S. Burtsev // Proceedings of the St. Petersburg Research Institute of Forestry. - St. Petersburg, 2014. - Issue 2. - P. 27-31.
- Whitcomb, C. E. Plant Production in Containers II / C. E. Whitcomb. –Lacebark Inc. Stillwater, 2003. – 1150 p. – Text: direct.
- Thomas, S. H. Tips to improve the way you produce container-grown trees / S. H. Thomas. – Text: direct // Nursery Manager. – 1994. – Vol. 10(1). – P. 50-54.
- Thiffault, N. Stock type in intensive silviculture: a (short) discussion about roots and size / N. Thiffault. – Text: direct // For Chron. – 2004. – Vol. 80. – P. 463-468.
- Whitcomb, C. E. Temperature control and water conservation in aboveground containers / C. E. Whitcomb, A. C. Whitcomb. – Text: direct // Proc. Int. Plant Propagators Soc. – 2006. – Vol. 56. – P. 588-594.
- Sibley, J. L. High temperature tolerance of roots of container-grown red maple cultivars / J. L. Sibley, J. M. Ruter, D. J. Eakes. – Text : direct // Proc. Southern Nurserymen’s Assoc. – 1999. – Vol. 44. – P. 24-28.
- Parkerson, C. H. P. A new field-type nursery operation / C. H. P. Parkerson. – Text: direct // Proc. International Plant Propagator’s Society. – 1990. – Vol. 40. – P. 417-419.
- Holcomb, M. The pot-in-pot (PNP) production system / M. Holcomb, D. Fare; U.S. National Arboretum. – Text: electronic. – McMinnville, 2009. – URL: http://www.tnstate.edu/faculty/ablalock/documents/Pot-N-Pot.pdf.
- Adolph, R. Pot-in-pot: from concept to reality / R. Adolph. – Text: direct // Comb. Proc.: Intern. Plant Propagators’Soc. – 2000. – Vol. 49. – P. 434-436.
- Mathers, H. Above ground and pot-in-pot container culture / H. Mathers. – Text: direct // The Digger. – 1999. – Vol. 43 (9). – P. 41-43.
- Mathers, H. M. Summary of temperature stress issues in nursery containers and current methods of protection / H. M. Mathers. – Text: direct // HortTechnology. – 2003. – Vol. 13. – P. 617-624.
- McNiel, R. E. Pot-in-pot production of nursery stock / R. E. McNiel. – Text: direct // Comb. Proc. Intern. Plant Propagators’ Soc. – 1998. – S. 1, Vol. 47. – P. 637-638.
- Owings, A. D. Pot-in-pot nursery production / A. D. Owings. – Text: direct // Louisiana Agric. – 2005. – Vol. 48(2). – P. 20.
- Ruter, J. M. The practicality of pot-in-pot / J. M. Ruter. – Text: direct // American Nurseryman. – 1997. – Vol. 185(1). – P. 32-37.
- Hybridisation of poplar trees : a monograph / A., P. Tsarev, R. P. Tsareva,. V. A. Tsarev, P. M. Evlakov / edited by A. P. Tsarev ; Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, VSUFT’.- Voronezh, 2021.- 289 p.
- J. Coombs, D. O. J. Coombs, D. O. Hall, S. P. Long Techniques in Bioproductivity and Photosynthesis: Pergamon International Library of Science, Technology, Engineering and Social Studies Elsevier, 2014. - 324 p. ISBN 1483190803, 9781483190808.
- Ort, D. R. Redesigning photosynthesis to sustainably meet global food and bioenergy demand / D. R. Ort, S. S. Merchant, J. Alric, A. Barkan, R. E. Blankenship, R. Bock // PNAS. – 2015. – V. 112. – P. 8529–8536.
- Zalesny Jr, Ronald & Hall, R.B. & Bauer, E.O. & Riemenschneider, D.E. (2003). Shoot Position Affects Root Initiation and Growth of Dormant Unrooted Cuttings of Populus. Silvae Genetica. 52. 273-279.
- Douglas, G.B.; McIvor, I.R.; Lloyd-West, C.M. Early root development of field-grown poplar: effects of planting material and genotype. New Zealand J. For. Sci. 2016, 46, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McIvor, I.R.; Sloan, S.; Pigem, L.R. Genetic and environmental influences on root development in cuttings of selected Salix and Populus clones – a greenhouse experiment. Plant Soil 2014, 377, 25–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Douglas, G.B.; McIvor, I.R.; Lloyd-West, C.M. Early root development of field-grown poplar: effects of planting material and genotype. New Zealand J. For. Sci. 2016, 46, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eliasson, L. Dependence of Root Growth on Photosynthesis in Populus tremula. Physiol. Plant. 2006, 21, 806–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okoro, O.O.; Grace, J. The Physiology of Rooting Populus Cuttings. Physiol. Plant. 2006, 36, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pallardy, Stephen & Kozlowski, T.. (1979). Early root and shoot growth of Populus clones. Silvae Genetica. 28.
- Vigl, F.; Rewald, B. Size matters? – The diverging influence of cutting length on growth and allometry of two Salicaceae clones. Biomass- Bioenergy 2014, 60, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, B.B.; Han, S.H.; Hernandez, J.O.; An, J.Y.; Nyam-Osor, B.; Jung, M.H.; Lee, P.S.-H.; Lee, S.I. The Use of Deep Container and Heterogeneous Substrate as Potentially Effective Nursery Practice to Produce Good Quality Nodal Seedlings of Populus sibirica Tausch. Forests 2021, 12, 418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vigl, F.; Rewald, B. Size matters? – The diverging influence of cutting length on growth and allometry of two Salicaceae clones. Biomass- Bioenergy 2014, 60, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Puri, Sanam & Thompson, F.B. (2003). Relationship of water to adventitious rooting in stem cuttings of Populus species. Agroforestry Systems. 58. 1-9. 10.1023/A:1025494221846.
- McIvor, I.R.; Sloan, S.; Pigem, L.R. Genetic and environmental influences on root development in cuttings of selected Salix and Populus clones – a greenhouse experiment. Plant Soil 2014, 377, 25–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, B.B.; Han, S.H.; Hernandez, J.O.; An, J.Y.; Nyam-Osor, B.; Jung, M.H.; Lee, P.S.-H.; Lee, S.I. The Use of Deep Container and Heterogeneous Substrate as Potentially Effective Nursery Practice to Produce Good Quality Nodal Seedlings of Populus sibirica Tausch. Forests 2021, 12, 418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, A.; Meng, L.; Han, S.H.; Seo, G.C.; Jung, M.H.; Park, B.B. The effect of soil heterogeneity and container length on the growth of Populus euramericana in a greenhouse study. Korean J. Agric. Sci. 2018, 45, 143–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Montagnoli, A.; Dumroese, R.K.; Negri, G.; Scippa, G.S.; Chiatante, D.; Terzaghi, M. Asymmetrical copper root pruning may improve root traits for reforesting steep and/or windy sites. New For. 2022, 53, 1093–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, A.; Meng, L.; Han, S.H.; Seo, G.C.; Jung, M.H.; Park, B.B. The effect of soil heterogeneity and container length on the growth of Populus euramericana in a greenhouse study. Korean J. Agric. Sci. 2018, 45, 143–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]







| Experience options |
Leaf mass dry, М, g ±mм |
Specific surface density of dry leaves g ±mм |
Stem dry mass g ±mм |
Root dry mass g ±mм | Weight of whole plant g ±mм | Productivity coefficient of the assimilation apparatus (g/m2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G1 (P. deltoids Marsh. x P. dalsamifera L. x (P. alba L.+ P. tremula L.) ʻЕ.s.-38ʼ, 1 L | ||||||
| 10 см | 1,0±0,16 | 2,08±0,08 | 5,8±0,54 | 2,9±0,27 | 9,7±0,92 | 20,2 |
| 14 см | 1,3±0,08 | 2,44±0,14 | 6,5±0,79 | 3±0,7 | 10,8±1,1 | 20,3 |
| G1 (P. deltoids Marsh. x P. dalsamifera L. x (P. alba L.+ P. tremula L.) ʻЕ.s.-38ʼ , 2 L | ||||||
| 10 см | 1,1±0,17 | 2,32±0,09 | 7,3±1,19 | 2,7±0,58 | 11,1±1,2 | 23,6 |
| 14 см | 1,2±0,12 | 2,4±0,14 | 9±0,51 | 3,3±0,41 | 13,5±1,2 | 25 |
| 18 см | 1,4±0,17 | 2,4±0,11 | 9,6±1,45 | 3,5±0,46 | 14,5±1,3 | 25 |
| 22 см | 2,0±0,15 | 2,6±0,05 | 10,5±0,8 | 4,4±0,36 | 16,9±1,5 | 21 |
| PiP 22 см | 1,9±0,24 | 2,46±0,05 | 32,8±0,63 | 5,8±0,53* | 40,5±3,46* | 52,6 |
| G1 (P. deltoids Marsh. x P. dalsamifera L. x (P. alba L.+ P. tremula L.)ʻЕ.s.-38ʼ , 3 L | ||||||
| 10 см | 1,3±0,14 | 2,32±0,05 | 8,5±0,54 | 2,8±0,25 | 12,6±1,5 | 22,5 |
| 14 см | 1,4±0,2 | 2,48±0,05 | 13,8±1,69 | 4,8±0,77 | 20,0±1,8 | 35,7 |
| 18 см | 2,1±0,18 | 2,58±0,09 | 14,7±0,61 | 4,3±0,6 | 21,1±1,9 | 26 |
| 22 см | 1,8 ±0,19 | 2,56±0,13 | 15,9±1,82 | 5,9±1,14 | 23,6±1,98 | 33,7 |
| Experience options | Leaf mass dry, М, g ±mм | Specific surface density of dry leaves g ±mм |
Stem dry mass g ±mм | Root dry mass g ±mм | Weight of whole plant g ±mм | Productivity coefficient of the assimilation apparatus (g/m2) |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G2 (Populus nigra L.), 1 L | |||||||||
| 10 см | 0,37±0,02 | 0,78±0,03 | 2,2±0,21 | 0,9±0,13 | 3,5±0,32 | 7,4 | |||
| 14 см | 0,44±0,04 | 0,83±0,04 | 2,2±0,13 | 1,0±0,14 | 3,64±0,35 | 6,8 | |||
| G2 (Populus nigra L.), 2 L | |||||||||
| 10 см | 0,53±0,07 | 0,77±0,05 | 2,1±0,3 | 1±0,3 | 3,63±0,3 | 5,3 | |||
| 14 см | 0,43±0,07 | 0,71±0,06 | 2,4±0,28 | 1±0,13 | 3,8±0,4 | 6,3 | |||
| 18 см | 0,45±0,06 | 0,77±0,02 | 2,8±0,38 | 1,1±0,22 | 4,3±0,4 | 7,4 | |||
| 22 см | 0,46±0,06 | 0,72±0,08 | 2,8±0,26 | 1,2±0,2 | 4,4±0,4 | 6,9 | |||
| PiP 22 см | 0,62±0,08 | 0,71±0,12 | 4,4±0,2 | 1,8±0,27 | 6,8±0,6 | 7,8 | |||
| G2 (Populus nigra L.), 3 L | |||||||||
| 10 см | 0,46±0,07 | 0,62±0,07 | 2,4±0,42 | 1,0±0,39 | 3,9±0,4 | 5,2 | |||
| 14 см | 0,48±0,04 | 0,66±0,03 | 2,5±0,4 | 1,0±0,2 | 3,4±0,4 | 5,4 | |||
| 18 см | 0,51±0,07 | 0,73±0,03 | 3,9±0,55 | 1,8±0,48 | 6,2±0,5 | 8,9 | |||
| 22 см | 0,53±0,04 | 0,74±0,07 | 4,2±0,2 | 1,6±0,16 | 6,3±0,5 | 8,9 | |||
| Selected groups by productivity | G 1 | G 2 | ||
| Total dry mass, g | Cultivation options |
Total dry mass, g | Cultivation options | |
| High-productivity group | 21,5 ± 0,97 | 3L18cm; 3L14cm; 2L22cm. | 6,4±0,19 | PiP; 3L22cm; 3L18cm. |
| Medium productivity group | 14,4 ± 0,49 | 3L10cm; 2L14cm; 2L18cm. |
4,4 ± 0,05 | 2L22cm; 2L18cm. |
| Low-productivity group | 10,5 ± 0,42 | 2L10cm; 1L10cm; 1L14cm. |
3,6 ± 0,08 | 3L14cm; 3L10cm; 2L14cm; 2L10cm; 1L14cm; 1L10cm. |
| Experience options outside the clusters |
40,5 16,9 |
PiP 2L22 |
- | - |
| Average productivity of all variants of the experiment | 17,9 ± 2,6 | 4,5 ± 0,38 | ||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
