Submitted:
06 January 2025
Posted:
07 January 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
Consumer’s Renewable Energy
Renewable Energy in India
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
- -
- H1: Self-effectiveness positively influenced solar energy adoption (β = 0.78, p < 0.01).
- -
- H2: Environmental concern was positively significant (β = 0.81, p < 0.01).
- -
- H3: Cost showed a negative but non-significant effect (β = -0.32, p > 0.05).
- -
- H4: Awareness was positively significant (β = 0.76, p < 0.01).
- -
- H5: Beliefs about benefits had a significant positive influence (β = 0.79, p < 0.01).
- -
- H6: Risk/trust perception was non-significant (β = 0.28, p > 0.05).
Theoretical Framework
Formulation of Hypothesis
Perception of Self-Effectiveness
Environmental Concern
Cost of Renewable Energy Generation
Awareness
Solar Energy Benefits Expectations
Risk and Trust Perception of Solar Energy
Research Methods
Research Instrument
Measurement Scale and Data Collection
Data Analysis
Results and Discussion
Respondents Descriptive Statistics
Model Fitness
Structural Equation Modelling
Association Between Environmental Concern and Consumer Adoption of RE
Association between Cost of Renewable Energy and Consumer Adoption of RE
Association between Awareness of Renewable Energy and Consumer Adoption of RE
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions and Recommendations
Implications
Limitations of the Study
Direction for the Future Research
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Sirasoontorn, P.; Koomsup, P. Energy Transition in India: Challenges and Opportunities.
- Friedrich Ebert Stiftung: Bangkok, India, 2017.
- Irfan, M.; Zhao, Z.-Y.; Li, H.; Rehman, A. The influence of consumers’ intention factors on willingness to pay for renewable energy: A structural equation modeling approach. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 21747–21761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smirnova, E.; Kot, S.; Kolpak, E.; Shestak, V. Governmental support and renewable energy production: A cross-country review. Energy 2021, 230, 120903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nate, S.; Bilan, Y.; Cherevatskyi, D.; Kharlamova, G.; Lyakh, O.; Wosiak, A. The Impact of Energy Consumption on the Three Pillars of Sustainable Development. Energies 2021, 14, 1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trifonov, I.; Trukhan, D.; Koshlich, Y.; Prasolov, V.; Slusarczyk, B. Influence of the Share of Renewable Energy Sources on the Level of Energy Security in EECCA Countries. Energies 2021, 14, 903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nate, S.; Bilan, Y.; Kurylo, M.; Lyashenko, O.; Napieralski, P.; Kharlamova, G. Mineral Policy within the Framework of Limited Critical Resources and a Green Energy Transition. Energies 2021, 14, 2688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kiprop, E.; Matsui, K.; Maundu, N. The Role of Household Consumers in Adopting Renewable Energy Technologies in Kenya. Environments 2019, 6, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaiyasoonthorn, W.; Khalid, B.; Chaveesuk, S. Success of Smart Cities Development with Community’s Acceptance of New Technologies. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Information Communication and Management, Prague, Czech Republic, 23-26 August 2019; pp. 106–111. [Google Scholar]
- Chaveesuk, S.; Khalid, B.; Chaiyasoonthorn, W. Emergence of New Business Environment with Big Data and Artificial Intelligence. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Information Communication and Management, Prague, Czech Republic; 23-26. [Google Scholar]
- Haseeb, M.; Kot, S.; Hussain, H.I.; Kamarudin, F. The natural resources curse-economic growth hypotheses: Quantile-on-Quantile evidence from top Asian economies. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 279, 123596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussain, H.; Haseeb, M.; Kamarudin, F.; Dacko-Pikiewicz, Z.; Szczepariska-Woszczyna, K. The Role of Globalization, Economic Growth and Natural Resources on the Ecological Footprint in India: Evidence from Nonlinear Causal Estimations. Processes 2021, 9, 1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muangmee, C.; Dacko-Pikiewicz, Z.; Meekaewkunchorn, N.; Kassakorn, N.; Khalid, B. Green Entrepreneurial Orientation and Green Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs). Soc. Sci. 2021, 10, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Majid, M.A. Renewable energy for sustainable development in India: Current status, future prospects, challenges, employment, and investment opportunities. Energy Sustain. Soc. 2020, 10, 1–36. [Google Scholar]
- Sestino, A. Review About Consumers’ Perception on Renewable Energy Market; SSRN: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Azhgaliyeva, D.; Beirne, J.; Mishra, R. What Matters for Private Investment Financing in Renewable Energy Globally and in Asia? ADBI Working Paper 1246. [CrossRef]
- Ndebele, T. Assessing the potential for consumer-driven renewable energy development in deregulated electricity markets dominated by renewables. Energy Policy 2020, 136, 111057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quirapas, M.; Taeihagh, A. Ocean renewable energy development in Southeast Asia: Opportunities, risks and unintended consequences. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 137, 110403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Senpong, C.; Wiwattanadate, D. Challenge of Renewable Energy Transition towards Krabi’s Sustainable Energy City. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; IOP Publishing: Bangkok, India, 2019; Volume 385, p. 012060. [Google Scholar]
- Nakapreecha, N.; Pongthanaisawan, J.; Wangjiraniran, W. Plausible Scenarios for Indian Energy Businesses in the Next 30 Years. Front. Energy Res. 2021, 8, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, M. The Transfer of Renewable Energy Policy Instrument from Europe to Southeast Asia: A Case Study of India’s Feed-in Tariff Policy. Master’s Thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, School of Architecture and Built Environment, Department of Sustainable Development, Environmental Science and Engineering, Stockholm, Sweden, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Lu, Y.; Khan, Z.A.; Alvarez-Alvarado, M.S.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, Z.; Imran, M. A Critical Review of Sustainable Energy Policies for the Promotion of Renewable Energy Sources. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siala, K.; Chowdhury, A.K.; Dang, T.D.; Galelli, S. Solar energy and regional coordination as a feasible alternative to large hydropower in Southeast Asia. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sriprapakhan, P.; Artkla, R.; Nuanual, S.; Maneechot, P. Economic and ecological assessment of integrated agricultural bio-energy and conventional agricultural energy frameworks for agriculture sustainability. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 2021, 20, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sugsaisakon, S.; Kittipongvises, S. Citywide Energy-Related CO2 Emissions and Sustainability Assessment of the Development of Low-Carbon Policy in Chiang Mai, India. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Junlakarn, S.; Kittner, N.; Tongsopit, S.; Saelim, S. A cross-country comparison of compensation mechanisms for distributed photovoltaics in the Philippines, India, and Vietnam. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 145, 110820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kot, M.; Kamifnski, B. Agent Based Model of Cross Media Reach of Advertising. In First Complex Systems Digital Campus World E-Conference 2015; Springer Science and Business Media LLC: Mainz, Germany, 2021; pp. 45–57. [Google Scholar]
- Khalid, B.; Chaveesuk, S.; Chaiyasoonthorn, W. MOOCs Adoption in Higher education: A management perspective. Pol. J. Manag. Stud. 2021, 23, 239–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muangmee, C.; Kot, S.; Meekaewkunchorn, N.; Kassakorn, N.; Khalid, B. Factors Determining the Behavioral Intention of Using Food Delivery Apps during COVID-19 Pandemics. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2021, 16, 1297–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wall, W.P. Determinants of SMES’ performance—from business strategy to innovation. Pol. J. Manag. Stud. 2021, 23, 537–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slusarczyk, B.; Tvaronaviciene, M.; Haque, A.U.; Olah, J. Predictors of industry 4.0 technologies affecting logistic enterprises’ performance: International perspective from economic lens. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 2020, 26, 1263–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khalid, B.; Lis, M.; Chaiyasoonthorn, W.; Chaveesuk, S. Factors influencing behavioural intention to use MOOCs. Eng. Manag. Prod. Serv. 2021, 13, 83–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meekaewkunchorn, N.; SzczepanskaWoszczyna, K.; Muangmee, C.; Kassakorn, N.; Khalid, B. Entrepreneurial orientation and SME performance: The mediating role of learning orientation. Econ. Sociol. 2021, 14, 294–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wall, W.P. The comparison of the TQM practices and quality performance between manufacturing and service sectors. Pol. J. Manag. Stud. 2021, 23, 436–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Irfan, M.; Zhao, Z.-Y.; Rehman, A.; Ozturk, I.; Li, H. Consumers’ intention-based influence factors of renewable energy adoption in Pakistan: A structural equation modeling approach. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 432–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zainudin, N.; Lau, J.L.; Munusami, C. Modelling household behavioural changes as an opportunity for sustainable home energy. Environ. Econ. Policy Stud. 2021, 23, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Makki, A.A.; Mosly, I. Factors Affecting Public Willingness to Adopt Renewable Energy Technologies: An Exploratory Analysis. Sustainability 2020, 12, 845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thiangtam, S. An analysis of factors influencing consumers’ intention to install solar power system with reference to evidence from India. Int. J. Technol. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 2016, 15, 239–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jabeen, G.; Yan, Q.; Ahmad, M.; Fatima, N.; Qamar, S. Consumers’ intention-based influence factors of renewable power generation technology utilization: A structural equation modeling approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 237, 117737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joshi, Y.; Rahman, Z. Factors Affecting Green Purchase Behaviour and Future Research Directions. Int. Strat. Manag. Rev. 2015, 3, 3,128–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cruz, S.M.; Manata, B. Measurement of Environmental Concern: A Review and Analysis. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ntanos, S.; Kyriakopoulos, G.; Chalikias, M.; Arabatzis, G.; Skordoulis, M. Public Perceptions and Willingness to Pay for Renewable Energy: A Case Study from Greece. Sustainability 2018, 10, 687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Komendantova, N.; Patt, A.; Barras, L.; Battaglini, A. Perception of risks in renewable energy projects: The case of concentrated solar power in North Africa. Energy Policy 2012, 40, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doci, G.; Gotchev, B. When energy policy meets community: Rethinking risk perceptions of renewable energy in Germany and the Netherlands. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2016, 22, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhagarra, D.; Goswami, M.; Kumar, G. Impact of Trust and Privacy Concerns on Technology Acceptance in Healthcare: An Indian Perspective. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2020, 141, 104164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, K.; Zhao, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Tan, X.; Zheng, H. A meta-analysis of the impact of trust on technology acceptance model: Investigation of moderating influence of subject and context type. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2011, 31, 572–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chapter 9. Social Imbalances and Spatial Organization. In Atlas of India; Open Edition; 2004; pp. 175-187. Available online: https://books.openedition.org/irdeditions/32597?lang=en (accessed on 30 August 2021).
- Alam, S.S.; Hashim, N.H.N.; Rashid, M.; Omar, N.A.; Ahsan, N.; Ismail, D. Small-scale households renewable energy usage intention: Theoretical development and empirical settings. Renew. Energy 2014, 68, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W.; Wang, C.; Mol, A. Rural public acceptance of renewable energy deployment: The case of Shandong in China. Appl. Energy 2013, 102, 1187–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steenkamp, J.-B.E.; Baumgartner, H. On the use of structural equation models for marketing modeling. Int. J. Res. Mark. 2000, 17, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wall, W.P. Strategic management and evaluation of the performance of family firms using management control system. Transnatl. Corp. Rev. 2021, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schumacker, R.E.; Lomax, R.G. A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling, 3rd ed.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Hu, L.T.; Bentler, P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. Multidiscip. J. 1999, 6, 6,1–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kline, R.B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 3rd ed.The Guildford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Thompson, B. Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis: Understanding Concepts and Applications; American Psychological Association (APA): Washington, DC, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Segars, A. Assessing the uni-dimensionality of measurement: A paradigm and illustration within the context of information systems research. Omega 1997, 25, 25,107–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, C.-S.; Ooi, H.-Y.; Goh, Y.-N. A moral extension of the theory of planned behavior to predict consumers’ purchase intention for energy-efficient household appliances in Malaysia. Energy Policy 2017, 107, 459–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dienes, C. Actions and intentions to pay for climate change mitigation: Environmental concern and the role of economic factors. Ecol. Econ. 2015, 109, 122–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghosh, A.; Ghosh, D. Investments in Clean Energy in South Asia: Visiting Barriers and Gaps from the Perspective of Policies and Politics in Sustainable Energy and Transportation 2018; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 115–135. [Google Scholar]
- Zografakis, N.; Sifaki, E.; Pagalou, M.; Nikitaki, G.; Psarakis, V.; Tsagarakis, K. Assessment of public acceptance and willingness to pay for renewable energy sources in Crete. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2010, 14, 1088–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
| Constructs Items Std. Loadings | CR | AVE |
Cronbach's Alpha |
|||||||
| Renewable Energy Awareness (REA) | 0.839 | 0.511 | 0.837 | |||||||
| REA1 I have interacted with renewable energy 0.714 | ||||||||||
| resources in the past | ||||||||||
| REA2 I am aware of renewable energy use and 0.736 needs | ||||||||||
| REA3 I know different types of renewable 0.671 energy that can be used | ||||||||||
| REA4 I know that renewable energy-based 0.701 solutions are available in India market |
||||||||||
| REA5 | I am aware of the benefits of renewable 0.748 energy utilization |
|||||||||
| Self-effectiveness Perception (SP) | 0.872 | 0.578 | 0.870 | |||||||
| SP1 | I possess the required knowledge to adopt 0.745 renewable energy and its resources |
|||||||||
| SP2 | I possess full control of consuming 0.787 renewable energy resources |
|||||||||
| SP3 | I know the experts to consults regarding 0.77 renewable energy |
|||||||||
| SP4 | I possess all resources of consuming 0.819 renewable energy |
|||||||||
| SP5 | I know where to find renewable energy 0.673 products if I need them |
|||||||||
| Environmental concern (EC) | 0.897 | 0.636 | 0.985 | |||||||
| EC1 | I am anxious about pollution in the 0.757 environment |
|||||||||
| EC2 | Environmental pollution caused by 0.809 energy is not good |
|||||||||
| EC3 | I am anxious about environmental problems 0.833 caused by energy sources |
|||||||||
| EC4 | I am anxious about climate change and the 0.774 associated hazardous effects |
|||||||||
| EC5 | Utilization of renewable energy can 0.811 improve the environment |
|||||||||
| Renewable energy generation cost (REC) | 0.854 | 0.595 | 0.852 | |||||||
| REC 1 | ||||||||||
| REC 2 |
Renewable renewable |
electricity | is | expensive | as | 0.717 | ||||
| energy projects need a heavy initial investment | ||||||||||
| REC 3 |
Renewable energy consumption needs a high installation cost |
0.847 | ||||||||
| REC 4 |
The Recurrent cost of renewable energy may be quite high |
0.754 | ||||||||
| The generation of renewable energy may cause additional cost 0.761 | ||||||||||
| Belief about Renewable Energy benefits (BRE) | 0.886 | 0.608 | 0.885 | |||||||
| BRE The utilization of renewable energy reduces 1 carbon emissions and improve energy structure |
0.766 | |||||||||
| BRE Renewable energy would avail new 2 environmental opportunities |
0.767 | |||||||||
| BRE The utilization of renewable energy would 3 improve public surroundings |
0.788 | |||||||||
| BRE Energy supply would become improved 4 with the utilization of RE |
0.813 | |||||||||
| BRE Employment opportunities will be increased 5 with the installation of new RE projects |
0.763 | |||||||||
| Intention to adopt renewable energy (IARE) | 0.890 | 0.618 | 0.889 | |||||||
| IARE I have the intention to adopt renewable energy 1 |
0.78 | |||||||||
| IARE The Energy-saving behavior encourage me 2 to adopt renewable energy |
0.786 | |||||||||
| IARE I am willing to be renewable energy 3 adoption ambassador |
0.823 | |||||||||
| IARE I have the intention to spend more on renewable 4 energy than other sources of energy |
0.805 | |||||||||
| IARE I strongly recommend others to adopt 5 renewable energy |
0.734 | |||||||||
| Risk Perception of Renewable Energy (RTP) | 0.862 | 0.556 | 0.859 | |||||||
| RTP I believe that renewable energy is a risk-free 1 source of energy |
0.724 | |||||||||
| RTP I am aware of the risks associated with 2 renewable energy |
0.719 | |||||||||
| RTP I don't think I am at risk when using 3 renewable energy |
0.772 | |||||||||
| RTP I trust renewable energy because it can 4 provide for my best interests in mind |
0.823 | |||||||||
| RTP 5 I trust that using renewable energy would be a 0.684 quick service | ||||||||||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).