Submitted:
17 December 2024
Posted:
17 December 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Octopus minor is a key seafood product in Korean coastal mudflats, holding significant industrial importance. However, limited distribution and environmental pollution of mudflats have underscored the need for stock restoration and development of superior breeds. This study analyzed Octopus minor genomic information by sex, tissue, and developmental stage, identi-fying differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Initially, de novo transcriptome assembly was per-formed to construct a reference sequence, resulting in 993,121 transcripts. After removing dupli-cates and analyzing expression changes, 40,688 transcripts were identified. DEGs were discov-ered, with 8,104 DEGs in females (gonad: 7,068, optic lobe: 1,036) compared to 5,285 in males (gonad: 4,765, optic lobe: 520). Gene expression changes related to sexual maturation were more pronounced in females and gonads compared to males and optic lobes. This study significantly contributes to future research on octopus genetics and trait improvement.
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Sample Collection and RNA Extraction
2.2. Library Construction and Reference Transcriptome Assembly
2.3. Identification of Octopus minor-Specific Sexual Maturation Genes
2.4. Gene Expression Patterns and DEG Identification
3. Results
3.1. Reference Transcriptome Construction
3.2. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of Expression Patterns
3.3. Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs)
3.4. Identification of Octopus-Specific Sexual Maturation Genes
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institution Review Board Statement
Informed Consent statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Oh, T.-Y.; Kim, J.-I.; Seo, Y.-I.; Lee, S.-K.; Choi, M.-S. Distribution characteristic of Octopus minor in the Tando Bay on the southwest coast of Korea. Journal of the Korean Society of Fisheries and Ocean Technology 2012, 48, 370–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vaz-Pires, P.; Seixas, P.; Barbosa, A. Aquaculture potential of the common octopus (Octopus vulgaris Cuvier, 1797): a review. Aquaculture 2004, 238, 221–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bo, Q.-K.; Zheng, X.-D.; Chen, Z.-W. Feeding intensity and molecular prey identification of the common long-armed octopus, Octopus minor (Mollusca: Octopodidae) in the wild. Plos one 2020, 15, e0220482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, W.; Han, E.J.; Park, E.; Shin, E.-J.; Han, H.-J.; Jung, K.; Heo, S.-J.; Kim, E.-A.; Kim, K.-N.; Kwak, I.-S. Hepatoprotective Activity of a Taurine-Rich Water Soluble Extract from Octopus vulgaris Meat. In Proceedings of the Taurine 11; 2019; pp. 691–703. [Google Scholar]
- Moon, S. A study on the morphology and biology of Octopus minor in Kyoungi bay, Yellow sea. Master's degree dissertation, Inha University, 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Jong, C.D.; An, K.D. Characteristics by the behaviour and habits of the common octopus (Octopus minor). Korean Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2003, 36, 735–742. [Google Scholar]
- Chung, E.; Kim, B.; Kim, S.; Ko, T. Reproductive ecology of Octopus ocellatus on the west coast of Korea. Yellow Sea 1999, 5, 33–45. [Google Scholar]
- Zheng, X.-D.; Qian, Y.-S.; Liu, C.; Li, Q. Octopus minor . Cephalopod culture 2014, 415–426. [Google Scholar]
- Shendure, J.; Ji, H. Next-generation DNA sequencing. Nature biotechnology 2008, 26, 1135–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roh, S.W.; Abell, G.C.; Kim, K.-H.; Nam, Y.-D.; Bae, J.-W. Comparing microarrays and next-generation sequencing technologies for microbial ecology research. Trends in biotechnology 2010, 28, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Subramanian, A.; Tamayo, P.; Mootha, V.K.; Mukherjee, S.; Ebert, B.L.; Gillette, M.A.; Paulovich, A.; Pomeroy, S.L.; Golub, T.R.; Lander, E.S. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2005, 102, 15545–15550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haas, B.J.; Papanicolaou, A.; Yassour, M.; Grabherr, M.; Blood, P.D.; Bowden, J.; Couger, M.B.; Eccles, D.; Li, B.; Lieber, M. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nature protocols 2013, 8, 1494–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Grabherr, M.G.; Haas, B.J.; Yassour, M.; Levin, J.Z.; Thompson, D.A.; Amit, I.; Adiconis, X.; Fan, L.; Raychowdhury, R.; Zeng, Q. Trinity: reconstructing a full-length transcriptome without a genome from RNA-Seq data. Nature biotechnology 2011, 29, 644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Compeau, P.E.; Pevzner, P.A.; Tesler, G. How to apply de Bruijn graphs to genome assembly. Nature biotechnology 2011, 29, 987–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simão, F.A.; Waterhouse, R.M.; Ioannidis, P.; Kriventseva, E.V.; Zdobnov, E.M. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 3210–3212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashburner, M.; Ball, C.A.; Blake, J.A.; Botstein, D.; Butler, H.; Cherry, J.M.; Davis, A.P.; Dolinski, K.; Dwight, S.S.; Eppig, J.T. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nature genetics 2000, 25, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Conesa, A.; Götz, S. Blast2GO: a comprehensive suite for functional analysis in plant genomics. International journal of plant genomics 2008, 2008, 619832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kanehisa, M.; Sato, Y.; Kawashima, M.; Furumichi, M.; Tanabe, M. KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation. Nucleic acids research 2016, 44, D457–D462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, P.; Piao, Y.; Shon, H.S.; Ryu, K.H. Comparing the normalization methods for the differential analysis of Illumina high-throughput RNA-Seq data. BMC bioinformatics 2015, 16, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robinson, M.D.; McCarthy, D.J.; Smyth, G.K. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. bioinformatics 2010, 26, 139–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, P. Nutrition of cephalopods: fueling the system. Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology 1995, 25, 35–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moltschaniwskyj, N.A. Understanding the process of growth in cephalopods. Marine and freshwater research 2004, 55, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosa, R.; Marques, A.M.; Nunes, M.L.; Bandarra, N.; Reis, C.S. Spatial-temporal changes in dimethyl acetal (octadecanal) levels of Octopus vulgaris (Mollusca, Cephalopoda): relation to feeding ecology. Scientia Marina 2004, 68, 227–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosa, R.; Pereira, J.; Nunes, M.L. Biochemical composition of cephalopods with different life strategies, with special reference to a giant squid, Architeuthis sp. Marine Biology 2005, 146, 739–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kilada, R.; Riad, R. Seasonal variations in biochemical composition of Loligo forbesi (Cephalopoda: Loliginidae) in the Mediterranean Sea and the Gulf of Suez, Egypt. Journal of Shellfish Research 2008, 27, 881–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morillo-Velarde, P.S.; Valverde, J.C.; Serra Llinares, R.M.; García, B.G. Changes in lipid composition of different tissues of common octopus (O ctopus vulgaris) during short-term starvation. Aquaculture Research 2013, 44, 1177–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nilsen, T.W. The spliceosome: the most complex macromolecular machine in the cell? Bioessays 2003, 25, 1147–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, N.; Gu, H.; Gao, Y.; Li, X.; Yu, G.; Lv, F.; Shi, C.; Wang, S.; Song, M.; Zhang, S. Study on influencing factors of semen quality in fertile men. Frontiers in Physiology 2022, 13, 813591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, X.; Chang, C.; Hao, M.; Chen, M.; Woodley, D.T.; Schönthal, A.H.; Li, W. Heat shock protein-90alpha (Hsp90α) stabilizes hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) in support of spermatogenesis and tumorigenesis. Cancer gene therapy 2021, 28, 1058–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]










Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).