Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

A Short Proof of Knuth's Old Sum

Submitted:

28 November 2024

Posted:

29 November 2024

Read the latest preprint version here

Abstract
We give a short proof of the well-known Knuth's old sum and provide some generalizations. Our approach utilizes the binomial theorem and integration formulas derived using the Beta function. Several new polynomial identities and combinatorial identities are derived.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

There appears to be a renewed interest [1,2,5,8,11] in the famous Knuth’s old sum (also known as the Reed Dawson identity),
k = 0 n ( 1 ) k n k 2 k 2 k k = 2 n n n / 2 , if n is even ; 0 , if n is odd .
Many different proofs of this identity and various generalizations exist in the literature (see [7] for a survey).
In this paper we give a very short proof of (1) and offer the following generalization:
k = 0 n ( 1 ) k n k 2 k m 2 ( k + m ) k + m = k = 0 m / 2 m 2 k 2 n 2 k 2 k + n ( 2 k + n ) / 2 , if n is even ; k = 1 m / 2 m 2 k 1 2 n 2 k + 1 2 k + n 1 ( 2 k + n 1 ) / 2 , if n is odd ;
where m and n are non-negative integers and, as usual, z is the greatest integer less than or equal to z while z is the smallest integer greater than or equal to z.
The following special cases of (2) were also reported in Riordan [9, p.72, Problem 4(b)]:
k = 0 n / 2 n 2 k 2 n 2 k 2 k k = 2 n n ,
k = 1 n / 2 n 2 k 1 2 n 2 k 2 k k = 1 2 2 n + 2 n + 1 2 n n = n n + 1 2 n n .
Identity (3) corresponds to setting n = 0 in (2) and re-labeling m as n; while (4) follows from setting n = 1 in (2).
In section 5, we will derive the following complements of Knuth’s old sum:
k = 0 n ( 1 ) k 2 k k 2 n k n k = 2 n n n / 2 , if n is even ; 0 , if n is odd ;
and
k = 0 n 2 n k n k 2 k k = 2 2 n .
Identity (5) is the famous combinatorial identity concerning the convolution of central binomial coefficients. Many different proofs of this identity exist in the literature, (see Mikić [6] and the many references therein).
Identity (2) is itself a particular case of a more general identity, stated in Theorem 2, which has many interesting consequences, including another generalization of Knuth’s old sum, namely,
k = 0 n ( 1 ) k n k 2 k 2 k + v 2 k + v / 2 k + v v / 2 1 = 2 n n n / 2 n + v / 2 v / 2 1 , if n is even ; 0 , if n is odd ;
where v is a real number; as well as simple, apparently new combinatorial identities such as
k = 1 n / 2 n 2 k 1 2 n 2 k C k = 1 2 C n + 2 C n + 1 ;
where, here and throughout this paper,
C j = 2 j j j + 1 ,
defined for every non-negative integer j, is a Catalan number.
Based on the binomial theorem, we will derive, in Section 7, some presumably new polynomial identities, including the following:
k = 0 n ( 1 ) n k n k 2 k 2 k k 1 x n k = k = 0 n / 2 n 2 k 2 2 k 2 k k x n 2 k .
Identity (6) subsumes Knuth’s old sum (1) (at x = 0 ), as well as (3) (at x = 1 ).
Finally, in Section 8, the polynomial identities will facilitate the derivation of apparently new combinatorial identities such as
k = 0 n / 2 n 2 k 1 2 k + 1 = 2 n 1 2 n 1 k = 1 n / 2 n 2 k 1 1 k , n 0 , k = 0 n / 2 n 2 k 2 2 k C k = 2 n + 1 n + 2 2 n + 1 C n ,
and
k = 0 n ( 1 ) n k n k 2 2 k + 1 k + 2 C k = k = 0 n / 2 n 2 k C k .

2. Required Identities

In order to give the short proof of Knuth’s old sum, we need a couple of definite integrals which we establish in Lemma 1.
The binomial coefficients are defined, for non-negative integers m and n, by
m n = m ! n ! ( m n ) ! , m n ; 0 , m < n ;
the number of distinct sets of n objects that can be chosen from m distinct objects.
Generalized binomial coefficients are defined for complex numbers u and v, excluding the set of negative integers, by
u v = Γ u + 1 Γ v + 1 Γ u v + 1 ,
where Γ ( z ) is the Gamma function defined by
Γ ( z ) = 0 e t t z 1 d t = 0 log 1 / t z 1 d t
and extended to the rest of the complex plain, excluding the non-positive integers, by analytic continuation.
Lemma 1.
Let u and v be complex numbers such that u > 1 and v > 1 . Let m be a non-negative integer. Then
0 π cos u ( x / 2 ) d x = 2 u π u u / 2 = 0 π sin u ( x / 2 ) d x ,
0 π cos m x d x = 2 m π m m / 2 , i f m i s e v e n ; 0 , i f m i s o d d ;
and, more generally,
I ( u , v ) : = 0 π cos u x 2 sin v x 2 d x = 2 u v π u u / 2 v v / 2 u + v / 2 u / 2 1 ,
and
J ( m , v ) : = 0 π cos m x sin v x d x = 2 m v π m m / 2 v v / 2 m + v / 2 m / 2 1 , i f m i s e v e n ; 0 , f f m i s o d d .
Obviously I ( v , u ) = I ( u , v ) , a symmetry property that is not possessed by J ( m , v ) .
Proof. 
Identities (10) and (11) are immediate consequences of the well-known Beta function integral [4]:
K ( u , v ) : = 0 π / 2 cos u x sin v x d x = 2 u v 1 π u u / 2 v v / 2 u + v / 2 u / 2 1 ,
valid for u > 1 , v > 1 , with the symmetry property K ( u , v ) = K ( v , u ) .
Identity (10) is obtained via a simple change of the integration variable from x to y in (12), with x = y / 2 .
To prove (11), write
J ( m , v ) = 0 π cos m x sin v x d x = 0 π / 2 cos m x sin v x d x + π / 2 π cos m x sin v x d x .
Change the integration variable in the second integral on the right hand side from x to y via x = y + π / 2 ; this gives
J ( m , v ) = 0 π / 2 cos m x sin v x d x + ( 1 ) m 0 π / 2 sin m y cos v y d y = K ( m , v ) + ( 1 ) m K ( v , m ) = 1 + ( 1 ) m K ( m , v ) ;
and hence (11).
Remark 1.
Since, for a real number u,
1 + ( 1 ) u = 2 cos 2 π u 2 + i sin π u ,
the J ( m , v ) stated in (11) is a special case of the following more general result:
J u , v = 0 π cos u x sin v x d x = π 2 u + v + 1 u u / 2 v v / 2 u + v / 2 u / 2 1 2 cos 2 π u 2 + i sin π u ,
which is valid for u > 1 and v > 1 .

3. A short proof of Knuth’s old sum

Theorem 1.
If n is a non-negative integer, then
k = 0 n ( 1 ) k n k 2 k 2 k k = 2 n n n / 2 , i f n i s e v e n ; 0 , i f n i s o d d .
Proof. 
Substitute cos x 1 for y in the binomial theorem
k = 0 n n k y k = ( 1 + y ) n ,
to obtain
k = 0 n ( 1 ) k n k 2 k cos 2 k ( x / 2 ) = ( 1 ) n cos n x .
Thus
k = 0 n ( 1 ) k n k 2 k 0 π cos 2 k ( x / 2 ) d x = ( 1 ) n 0 π cos n x d x ,
and hence (1) on account of (8) and (9). □

4. A Generalization of Knuth’s Old Sum

In this section we extend (1) by introducing an arbitrary non-negative integer m and a real number v.
Theorem 2.
If m and n are non-negative integers and v is a real number, then
k = 0 n ( 1 ) k n k 2 k m 2 k + 2 m + v ( 2 k + 2 m + v ) / 2 k + m + v v / 2 1 = k = 0 m / 2 m 2 k 2 n 2 k 2 k + n ( 2 k + n ) / 2 ( 2 k + n + v ) / 2 ( 2 k + n ) / 2 1 , i f n i s e v e n ; k = 1 m / 2 m 2 k 1 2 n 2 k + 1 2 k + n 1 ( 2 k + n 1 ) / 2 ( 2 k + n 1 + v ) / 2 ( 2 k + n 1 ) / 2 1 , i f n i s o d d .
In particular,
k = 0 n ( 1 ) k n k 2 k m 2 ( k + m ) k + m = k = 0 m / 2 m 2 k 2 n 2 k 2 k + n ( 2 k + n ) / 2 , if n is even ; k = 1 m / 2 m 2 k 1 2 n 2 k + 1 2 k + n 1 ( 2 k + n 1 ) / 2 , if n is odd .
Proof. 
Since
1 + cos x m = 2 m cos 2 m x 2 = k = 0 m m k cos k x
and
sin v x = 2 v sin v x 2 cos v x 2 ,
multiplication of the left hand side of (14) by
2 m + v cos 2 m + v x 2 sin v x 2
and the right hand side by
sin v x k = 0 m m k cos k x
gives
k = 0 n ( 1 ) k n k 2 k + m + v cos 2 k + 2 m + v ( x / 2 ) sin v ( x / 2 ) = ( 1 ) n k = 0 m m k cos k + n x sin v x ;
so that
k = 0 n ( 1 ) k n k 2 k + m + v cos 2 k + 2 m + v ( x / 2 ) sin v ( x / 2 ) = ( 1 ) n k = 0 m / 2 m 2 k cos 2 k + n x sin v x + ( 1 ) n k = 1 m / 2 m 2 k 1 cos 2 k 1 + n x sin v x ,
from which (15) now follows by termwise integration from 0 to π , according to the parity of n, using Lemma 1.
Corollary 1.
If n is a non-negative integer and v is a real number, then
k = 0 n ( 1 ) k n k 2 k 2 k + v 2 k + v / 2 k + v v / 2 1 = 2 n n n / 2 n + v / 2 v / 2 1 , i f n i s e v e n ; 0 , i f n i s o d d ;
Corollary 2.
If n is a non-negative integer and v is a real number, then
k = 0 n / 2 n 2 k 2 2 k 2 k k 2 k + v / 2 k 1 = 2 n 2 n + v 2 n + v / 2 n + v v / 2 1 ,
and
k = 1 n / 2 n 2 k 1 2 n 2 k 2 k k 2 k + v / 2 k 1 = 1 2 2 n + v + 2 2 n + v + 2 / 2 n + v + 1 v / 2 1 2 n + v 2 n + v / 2 n + v v / 2 1 .
Proof. 
Identity (17) is obtained by setting n = 0 in (15) and re-labeling m as n while (18) is the evaluation of (15) at n = 1 with a re-labeling of m as n. □
Proposition 1.
If n is a non-negative integer, then
k = 1 n / 2 n 2 k 1 1 2 k + 1 = 2 n + 1 n + 2 2 n n + 1 ,
k = 1 n / 2 n 2 k 1 2 n 2 k C k = 1 2 C n + 2 C n + 1 .
Proof. 
Evaluation of (18) at v = 1 gives (19) while evaluation at v = 2 yields (20). In deriving (19), we used the following relationships between binomial coefficients:
r 1 / 2 = 2 2 r + 1 π 2 r r 1 ,
r r / 2 = 2 2 r π r r 1 / 2 1 ,
r + 1 / 2 r = 2 r + 1 2 2 r 2 r r ,
and
r s r = s s 1 r 1 ;
all of which can be derived by using the Gamma function identities:
Γ u + 1 2 = π 2 2 u 2 u u Γ u + 1 ,
and
Γ u + 1 2 = ( 1 ) u 2 2 u 2 u u 1 π Γ u + 1 ,
together with the definition of the generalized binomial coefficients as given in (7). □
Proposition 2.
If m and n are non-negative integers, then
k = 0 n ( 1 ) k n k 2 k + m k + m + 1 = k = 0 m / 2 m 2 k 1 2 k + n + 1 , i f n i s e v e n ; k = 1 m / 2 m 2 k 1 1 2 k + n , i f n i s o d d .
In particular,
k = 0 n ( 1 ) k n k 2 k k + 1 = 1 n + 1 , if n is even ; 0 , if n is odd ;
and
k = 0 n ( 1 ) k n k 2 k + 1 k + 2 = 1 n + 1 , if n is even ; 1 n + 2 , if n is odd .
Proof. 
Evaluate (15) at v = 1 .

5. Complements of Knuth’s Old Sum

Theorem 3.
If n is a non-negative integer, then
k = 0 n ( 1 ) k 2 k k 2 n k n k = 2 n n n / 2 , i f n i s e v e n ; 0 , i f n i s o d d .
Proof. 
Set a = cos 2 ( x / 2 ) and b = sin 2 ( x / 2 ) in the binomial theorem
k = 0 n n k a k b n k = a + b n ,
to obtain
k = 0 n ( 1 ) n k n k cos 2 k x 2 sin 2 n 2 k x 2 = cos n x ,
from which (28) follows by term-wise integration using Lemma 1. □
Theorem 4.
If n is a non-negative integer, then
k = 0 n 2 n 2 k n k 2 k k = 2 2 n .
Proof. 
Set a = cos 2 ( x / 2 ) and b = sin 2 ( x / 2 ) in the binomial theorem (29) to obtain
k = 0 n n k cos 2 k x 2 sin 2 n 2 k x 2 = 1 ,
from which the stated identity follows by term-wise integration using Lemma 1. □
Next, we present a generalization of (28).
Theorem 5.
If n is a non-negative integer and v is a real number, then
k = 0 n ( 1 ) k n k 2 k + v 2 k + v / 2 2 n 2 k + v 2 n 2 k + v / 2 n + v 2 k + v / 2 1 = 2 n n n / 2 v v / 2 n + v / 2 v / 2 1 , i f n i s e v e n ; 0 , i f n i s o d d . .
Proof. 
Multiply through (30) by sin v x and integrate from 0 to π , using Lemma 1. □
We conclude this section with a generalization of (5).
Theorem 6.
If n is a non-negative integer and v is a real number, then
k = 0 n n k 2 k + v 2 k + v / 2 2 n 2 k + v 2 n 2 k + v / 2 n + v 2 k + v / 2 1 = 2 2 n v v / 2 .
Proof. 
Multiply through (31) by sin v x and integrate from 0 to π , using Lemma 1. □

6. Combinatorial Identities Associated with Polynomial Identities of a Certain Type

In this section we derive the combinatorial identities associated with any polynomial identity having the following form:
P ( t , ) = k = s n f ( k ) 1 + t p ( k ) = k = m r g ( k ) t q ( k ) ;
where m, n, r and s are non-negative integers, p ( k ) and q ( k ) are sequences of non-negative integers, f ( k ) and g ( k ) are sequences, and t is a complex variable. The ellipsis (…) indicates the presence of other parameters and variables.
Theorem 7.
Let P ( t , ) be the polynomial identity given in (34). Let u and v be arbitrary complex numbers such that u > 1 and v > 1 . Then
k = s n f ( k ) p ( k ) + u + v + 1 u + 1 1 = u + 1 v + 1 k = m r ( 1 ) q ( k ) g ( k ) q ( k ) + u + v + 1 v + 1 1 .
In particular,
k = s n f ( k ) p ( k ) + 1 = k = m r ( 1 ) q ( k ) g ( k ) q ( k ) + 1 .
Proof. 
Write t for t in (34) and multiply through by t u ( 1 t ) v to obtain
k = s n f ( k ) 1 t p ( k ) + v t u = k = m r ( 1 ) q ( k ) g ( k ) 1 t v t q ( k ) + u ;
from which (35) follows after integrating from 0 to 1, using the Beta function (variant of (12)):
0 1 1 t x t y d t = 1 x + 1 x + y + 1 x + 1 1 ;
for x > 1 and y > 1 . □
Theorem 8.
Let P ( t , ) be the polynomial identity given in (34). Let u and v be arbitrary complex numbers such that u > 1 and v > 1 . Then
k = s n f ( k ) 2 2 p ( k ) v v / 2 2 p ( k ) + u 2 p ( k ) + u / 2 2 p ( k ) + u + v / 2 v / 2 1 = k = m r ( 1 ) q ( k ) g ( k ) 2 2 q ( k ) u u / 2 2 q ( k ) + v 2 q ( k ) + v / 2 2 q ( k ) + u + v / 2 u / 2 1 .
In particular,
k = s n f ( k ) 2 2 p ( k ) 2 p ( k ) p ( k ) = k = m r ( 1 ) q ( k ) g ( k ) 2 2 q ( k ) 2 q ( k ) q ( k ) .
Proof. 
Write sin 2 t for t in (34) and multiply through by cos u t sin v t to obtain
k = s n f ( k ) cos 2 p ( k ) + u t sin v t = k = m r ( 1 ) q ( k ) g ( k ) cos u t sin 2 q ( k ) + v t ,
from which (37) follows upon integration from 0 to π / 2 using Lemma 1. □
Theorem 9.
Let P ( t , ) be the polynomial identity given in (34). Let v be an arbitrary complex number such that v > 1 .
1.
Suppose that, for every integer j, each of q ( 2 j ) and q ( 2 j 1 ) is a sequence of non-negative integers having a definite parity but such that the parity of q ( 2 j ) is different from the parity of q ( 2 j 1 ) for every integer j.
If q ( 2 j ) is an even integer for every integer j, then
k = s n f ( k ) 2 p ( k ) 2 p ( k ) + v 2 p ( k ) + v / 2 p ( k ) + v v / 2 1 = k = ( m + 1 ) / 2 r / 2 g ( 2 k ) 2 q ( 2 k ) q ( 2 k ) q ( 2 k ) / 2 q ( 2 k ) + v / 2 v / 2 1 ,
while if q ( 2 j ) is an odd integer for every integer j, then
k = s n f ( k ) 2 p ( k ) 2 p ( k ) + v 2 p ( k ) + v / 2 p ( k ) + v v / 2 1 = k = ( m + 2 ) / 2 r / 2 g ( 2 k 1 ) 2 q ( 2 k 1 ) q ( 2 k 1 ) q ( 2 k 1 ) / 2 q ( 2 k 1 ) + v / 2 v / 2 1 .
2.
Suppose that, for every integer j, each of p ( 2 j ) and p ( 2 j 1 ) is a sequence of non-negative integers having a definite parity but such that the parity of p ( 2 j ) is different from the parity of p ( 2 j 1 ) for every integer j.
If p ( 2 j ) is an even integer for every integer j, then
k = m r g ( k ) ( 1 ) q ( k ) 2 q ( k ) 2 q ( k ) + v 2 q ( k ) + v / 2 q ( k ) + v v / 2 1 = k = ( s + 1 ) / 2 n / 2 ( 1 ) p ( 2 k ) f ( 2 k ) 2 p ( 2 k ) p ( 2 k ) p ( 2 k ) / 2 p ( 2 k ) + v / 2 v / 2 1
while if p ( 2 j ) is an odd integer for every integer j, then
k = m r g ( k ) ( 1 ) q ( k ) 2 q ( k ) 2 q ( k ) + v 2 q ( k ) + v / 2 q ( k ) + v v / 2 1 = k = ( s + 2 ) / 2 n / 2 ( 1 ) p ( 2 k 1 ) f ( 2 k 1 ) 2 p ( 2 k 1 ) p ( 2 k 1 ) p ( 2 k 1 ) / 2 p ( 2 k 1 ) + v / 2 v / 2 1 .
Proof. 
Set t = cos x in (34) and multiply through by sin v x to obtain
k = s n 2 p ( k ) + v f ( k ) cos 2 p ( k ) + v x 2 sin v x 2 = k = ( m + 1 ) / 2 r / 2 g ( 2 k ) cos q ( 2 k ) x sin v x + k = ( m + 2 ) / 2 r / 2 g ( 2 k 1 ) cos q ( 2 k 1 ) x sin v x ,
from which (39) and (40) follow after term-wise integration from 0 to π , using Lemma 1. Identities (41) and (42) are obtained from (39) and (40) since (34) can be written in the following equivalent form:
k = m r ( 1 ) q ( k ) g ( k ) 1 + t q ( k ) = k = s n ( 1 ) p ( k ) f ( k ) t p ( k ) .
In particular,
  • Suppose that, for every integer j, each of q ( 2 j ) and q ( 2 j 1 ) is a sequence of non-negative integers having a definite parity but such that the parity of q ( 2 j ) is different from the parity of q ( 2 j 1 ) for every integer j.
    If q ( 2 j ) is an even integer for every integer j, then
    k = s n f ( k ) 2 p ( k ) 2 p ( k ) p ( k ) = k = ( m + 1 ) / 2 r / 2 g ( 2 k ) 2 q ( 2 k ) q ( 2 k ) q ( 2 k ) / 2 ,
    while if q ( 2 j ) is an odd integer for every integer j, then
    k = s n f ( k ) 2 p ( k ) 2 p ( k ) p ( k ) = k = ( m + 2 ) / 2 r / 2 g ( 2 k 1 ) 2 q ( 2 k 1 ) q ( 2 k 1 ) q ( 2 k 1 ) / 2 ,
  • Suppose that, for every integer j, each of p ( 2 j ) and p ( 2 j 1 ) is a sequence of non-negative integers having a definite parity but such that the parity of p ( 2 j ) is different from the parity of p ( 2 j 1 ) for every integer j.
    If p ( 2 j ) is an even integer for every integer j, then
    k = m r g ( k ) ( 1 ) q ( k ) 2 q ( k ) 2 q ( k ) q ( k ) = k = ( s + 1 ) / 2 n / 2 f ( 2 k ) 2 p ( 2 k ) p ( 2 k ) p ( 2 k ) / 2 ,
    while if p ( 2 j ) is an odd integer for every integer j, then
    k = m r g ( k ) ( 1 ) q ( k ) 2 q ( k ) 2 q ( k ) q ( k ) = k = ( s + 2 ) / 2 n / 2 ( 1 ) p ( 2 k 1 ) f ( 2 k 1 ) 2 p ( 2 k 1 ) p ( 2 k 1 ) p ( 2 k 1 ) / 2 .
Corollary 3.
Let an arbitrary polynomial identity have the following form:
P ( t , ) = k = s n f ( k ) 1 + t k = k = m r g ( k ) t k ,
where m, n, r and s are non-negative integers, f ( k ) and g ( k ) are sequences, and t is a complex variable. Let v be an arbitrary real number. Then
k = s n f ( k ) 2 k 2 k + v 2 k + v / 2 k + v v / 2 1 = k = ( m + 1 ) / 2 r / 2 g ( 2 k ) 2 2 k 2 k k 2 k + v / 2 v / 2 ,
and
k = m r g ( k ) ( 1 ) k 2 k 2 k + v 2 k + v / 2 k + v v / 2 1 = k = ( s + 1 ) / 2 n / 2 f ( 2 k ) 2 2 k 2 k k 2 k + v / 2 v / 2 1 .
In particular,
k = s n f ( k ) 2 k 2 k k = k = ( m + 1 ) / 2 r / 2 g ( 2 k ) 2 2 k 2 k k ,
and
k = m r g ( k ) ( 1 ) k 2 k 2 k k = k = ( s + 1 ) / 2 n / 2 f ( 2 k ) 2 2 k 2 k k .

7. Polynomial Identities

In this section, by following the procedures outlined in Section 6, we derive new polynomial identities associated with the binomial theorem.
Theorem 10.
Let u and v be arbitrary complex numbers such that u > 1 and v > 1 . Let x be a complex variable. If n is a non-negative integer, then
k = 0 n ( 1 ) n k n k k + u + v + 1 u + 1 1 1 x n k = u + 1 v + 1 k = 0 n ( 1 ) k n k k + u + v + 1 v + 1 1 x n k .
In particular,
k = 0 n ( 1 ) n k n k k + 1 1 x n k = k = 0 n ( 1 ) k n k k + 1 x n k .
Proof. 
Consider the following variation on the binomial theorem:
k = 0 n ( 1 ) n k n k 1 + t k 1 x n k = k = 0 n n k t k x n k .
Use (35) with
f ( k ) = ( 1 ) n k n k ( 1 x ) n k , g ( k ) = n k x n k , s = 0 = m , r = n ,
to obtain (52).
Theorem 11.
If n is a non-negative integer, v is a real number and x is a complex variable, then
k = 0 n ( 1 ) n k n k 2 k 2 k + v 2 k + v / 2 k + v v / 2 1 1 x n k = k = 0 n / 2 n 2 k 2 2 k 2 k k 2 k + v / 2 k 1 x n 2 k .
Proof. 
On account of (47) and with (54) in mind, use (48) with
f ( k ) = ( 1 ) n k n k ( 1 x ) n k , g ( k ) = n k x n k , s = 0 = m , r = n ,
to obtain (55).
Corollary 4.
If n is a non-negative integer and x is a complex variable, then
k = 0 n ( 1 ) n k n k 2 k k + 1 1 x n k = k = 0 n / 2 n 2 k 2 k + 1 x n 2 k ,
k = 0 n ( 1 ) n k n k k + 2 2 k 2 k + 1 k + 1 1 x n k = k = 0 n / 2 n 2 k k + 1 2 2 k 2 k k x n 2 k .
Proof. 
Identity (6) on page 6 and identities (56) and (57) correspond to the evaluation of (55) at v = 0 , v = 1 and v = 2 , respectively.
In deriving (56), we used (21)–(24) to obtain
2 k + 1 k + 1 / 2 = 2 4 k + 4 π k + 1 2 k + 1 k + 1 2 2 k + 1 k ,
k + 1 1 / 2 = 2 2 k + 3 π 2 k + 1 k + 1 1 ,
and
2 k + 1 k = 1 2 2 k + 1 k + 1 .
Theorem 12.
Let u and v be complex numbers such that u > 1 and v > 1 . If n is a non-negative integer, then
v v / 2 k = 0 n ( 1 ) n k n k 2 2 k 2 k + u 2 k + u / 2 2 k + u + v / 2 v / 2 1 1 x n k = u u / 2 k = 0 n ( 1 ) k n k 2 2 k 2 k + v 2 k + v / 2 2 k + u + v / 2 u / 2 1 x n k .
Proof. 
With (54) in mind, use
f ( k ) = ( 1 ) n k n k ( 1 x ) n k , g ( k ) = n k x n k , s = 0 = m , r = n ,
and p ( k ) = k = q ( k ) in (37). □
Theorem 13.
if n is a non-negative integer, v is a real number and x is a complex variable, then
k = 0 n n k 2 k 2 k + v 2 k + v / 2 k + v v / 2 1 1 x k x n k = k = 0 n / 2 n 2 k 2 2 k 2 k k 2 k + v / 2 k 1 ( 1 x ) 2 k .
Proof. 
Consider another variation on the binomial theorem:
k = 0 n n k 1 x k 1 + y k x n k = k = 0 n n k y k 1 x k .
Again, this identity has the form of (47). Use (48) with
f ( k ) = n k ( 1 x ) k x n k , g ( k ) = n k ( 1 x ) k , s = 0 = m , r = n ,
to obtain (59). □
Corollary 5.
If n is a non-negative integer and x is a complex variable, then
k = 0 n n k 2 k 2 k k 1 x k x n k = k = 0 n / 2 n 2 k 2 2 k 2 k k ( 1 x ) 2 k ,
k = 0 n n k 2 k k + 1 1 x k x n k = k = 0 n / 2 n 2 k 2 k + 1 ( 1 x ) 2 k ,
k = 0 n n k 2 k C k + 1 1 x k x n k = k = 0 n / 2 n 2 k 2 2 k C k 1 x 2 k .
Proof. 
Identities (61), (62) and (63) correspond to the evaluation of (59) at v = 0 , v = 1 and v = 2 , respectively. □
Remark 2.
The reader is invited to employ (35) and (37) to discover more polynomial identities associated with (60).

8. More Combinatorial Identities

8.1. Identities from the Binomial Theorem

Theorem 14.
If n is an integer and v is a real number, then
k = 0 n ( 1 ) k n k 2 n 2 k 2 k + v 2 k + v / 2 k + v v / 2 1 = k = 0 n / 2 n 2 k 2 2 k 2 k k 2 k + v / 2 k 1 ,
and
k = 0 n n k 2 k 2 k + v 2 k + v / 2 k + v v / 2 1 = k = 0 n / 2 n 2 k 2 n 4 k 2 k k 2 k + v / 2 k 1 .
Proof. 
Evaluate (55) at x = 1 and x = 2 , respectively. □
Remark 3.
Setting x = 0 in (55) reproduces identity (16) while setting x = 1 reproduces (17).
Proposition 3.
If n is a non-negative integer, then
k = 0 n ( 1 ) k n k 2 n 2 k 2 k k = k = 0 n / 2 n 2 k 2 2 k 2 k k ,
k = 0 n / 2 n 2 k 1 2 k + 1 = 2 n 1 2 n 1 k = 1 n / 2 n 2 k 1 1 k , n 0 ,
k = 0 n ( 1 ) k n k 2 k + 1 k + 2 2 n 2 k + 1 C k = k = 0 n / 2 n 2 k 2 2 k C k .
Proof. 
Set x = 1 in identities (6), (56) and (57). □
Proposition 4.
If n is a non-negative integer, then
k = 0 n / 2 n 2 k 2 2 k 2 k k = 2 n 2 n n ,
k = 0 n / 2 n 2 k 2 k + 1 = 2 n n + 1 ,
k = 0 n / 2 n 2 k k + 1 2 2 k 2 k k = 2 n + 1 n + 2 2 n + 1 C n .
Proof. 
Set x = 1 in each of identities (6)–(57). □
Proposition 5.
If n is a non-negative integer, then
k = 0 n n k 2 k 2 k k = k = 0 n / 2 n 2 k 2 n 4 k 2 k k ,
k = 0 n / 2 n 2 k 2 n 2 k + 1 2 2 k + 1 2 k + 1 = k = 1 n / 2 n 2 k 1 2 2 k 1 k ,
k = 0 n n k 2 k + 1 k + 2 2 k + 1 C k = k = 0 n / 2 n 2 k 2 n 4 k C k .
Proof. 
Set x = 2 in each of identities (6)–(57).
Theorem 15.
if n is a non-negative integer and v is a real number, then
k = 0 n ( 1 ) n k n k 2 k + v 2 k + v / 2 k + v v / 2 1 = k = 0 n / 2 n 2 k 2 k k 2 k + v / 2 k 1 .
Proof. 
Set x = 1 in (59). □
Proposition 6.
If n is a non-negative integer, then
k = 0 n ( 1 ) n k n k 2 k k = k = 0 n / 2 n k n k k ,
k = 0 n ( 1 ) n k n k 2 2 k k + 1 = k = 0 n / 2 n 2 k 2 2 k 2 k + 1 ,
k = 0 n ( 1 ) n k n k 2 2 k + 1 k + 2 C k = k = 0 n / 2 n 2 k C k .
Proof. 
Set x = 1 in each of identities (61)–(63) or what is the same thing, v = 0 , v = 1 and v = 2 in (74).
Theorem 16.
If n is a non-negative integer and v is a real number, then
k = 0 n 2 n 2 k 2 n k n k 2 k + v 2 k + v / 2 2 n + v / 2 n k 1 = k = 0 n / 2 n 2 k 2 2 n 2 k 2 k k 2 k + v 2 k + v / 2 4 k + v / 2 k 1
and
k = 1 n 2 n 2 k 1 2 n k + 1 n k + 1 2 k 1 + v 2 k 1 + v / 2 2 n + v + 1 / 2 n k + 1 1 = k = 1 n / 2 n 2 k 1 2 2 n + 1 2 k 2 k k 2 k 1 + v 2 k 1 + v / 2 4 k + v 1 / 2 k 1 .
In particular,
k = 0 n 2 n 2 k 2 n k n k 2 k k n k 1 = k = 0 n / 2 n 2 k 2 2 n 2 k 2 k k
and
k = 1 n 2 n 2 k 1 2 n k + 1 n k + 1 2 k 1 2 k 1 / 2 2 n + 1 / 2 n k + 1 1 = k = 1 n / 2 n 2 k 1 2 2 n + 1 2 k 2 k k 2 k 1 2 k 1 / 2 4 k 1 / 2 k 1 .
Proof. 
Since
cos x 2 + sin x 2 2 m = 1 + sin x m ,
the binomial theorem gives
k = 0 2 n 2 n k cos 2 n k x 2 sin k x 2 = k = 0 n n k sin k x ,
so that
k = 0 2 n 2 n k cos 2 n k x sin k x = k = 0 n n k 2 k cos k x sin k x
and, therefore,
k = 0 n 2 n 2 k sin 2 k + v x cos 2 n 2 k x + k = 1 n 2 n 2 k 1 sin 2 k 1 + v x cos 2 n 2 k x = k = 0 n / 2 n 2 k 2 2 k cos 2 k x sin 2 k + v x + k = 1 n / 2 n 2 k 1 2 2 k 1 cos 2 k 1 x sin 2 k 1 + v x .
Integrating from 0 to π using Lemma 1 gives (78) while multiplying through by cos x and integrating from 0 to π gives (79).

8.2. Identities from Waring’s Formulas

Waring’s formula and its dual [3, Equations (22)and (1)] are
k = 0 n / 2 ( 1 ) k n n k n k k ( x y ) k ( x + y ) n 2 k = x n + y n
and
k = 0 n / 2 ( 1 ) k n k k ( x y ) k ( x + y ) n 2 k = x n + 1 y n + 1 x y .
Identity (82) holds for positive integer n while identity (83) holds for any non-negative integer n.
Theorem 17.
If n is a non-negative integer and v is a real number, then
k = 0 n / 2 ( 1 ) k n n k n k k 2 4 k 2 k + v 2 k + v / 2 = 2 n + v 2 n + v / 2 v v / 2 2 1 2 n n + v v / 2 1 .
In particular,
k = 0 n / 2 ( 1 ) k n n k n k k 2 4 k 2 k k = 2 2 n + 1 2 n n .
Proof. 
Write cos 2 ( x / 2 ) for x and sin 2 ( y / 2 ) for y in (82) and multiply through by sin v x to obtain
k = 0 n / 2 ( 1 ) k n n k n k k 2 2 k sin 2 k + v x = 2 v cos 2 n + v x 2 sin v x 2 + 2 v sin 2 n + v x 2 cos v x 2 ,
from which upon term-wise integration from 0 to π , identity (84) follows.
By writing cos 2 ( x / 2 ) for x and sin 2 ( y / 2 ) for y, the reader is invited to discover a combinatorial identity associated with (83).

8.3. Identities from an Identity of Simons

Simons [10] proved an identity that is equivalent to the following:
k = 0 n ( 1 ) n k n k n + k k 1 + t k = k = 0 n n k n + k k t k .
On choosing
f ( k ) = ( 1 ) n k n k n + k k , g ( k ) = n k n + k k ,
s = m = 0 and r = n in (47), (48) gives the result stated in the next proposition.
Proposition 7.
If n is a non-negative integer and v is a real number, then
k = 0 n ( 1 ) n k n k 2 k n + k k 2 k + v 2 k + v / 2 k + v v / 2 1 = k = 0 n / 2 n 2 k 2 2 k n + 2 k 2 k 2 k k 2 k + v / 2 v / 2 1 .
In particular,
k = 0 n ( 1 ) n k n k 2 k n + k k 2 k k = k = 0 n / 2 n 2 k 2 2 k n + 2 k 2 k 2 k k .
The same set of sequences and parameters, f ( k ) etc. that led to (88), when used in (37) gives the following result.
Proposition 8.
If n is a non-negative integer and u and v are real numbers, then
k = 0 n ( 1 ) n k n k 2 2 k n + k k v v / 2 2 k + u 2 k + u / 2 2 k + u + v / 2 v / 2 1 = k = 0 n ( 1 ) k n k 2 2 k n + k k u u / 2 2 k + v 2 k + v / 2 2 k + u + v / 2 u / 2 1 .

References

  1. Adegoke, K. Editorial Correction to A note on a generalization of Riordan combinatorial identity via a hypergeometric series approach. Notes on Number Theory and Discrete Mathematics 2024, 30, 211–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Alzer, H. Combinatorial identities and hypergeometric functions, II. Discrete Mathematics Letters 2024, 13, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  3. Gould, H.W. The Girard-Waring power sum formulas for symmetric functions and Fibonacci sequences. The Fibonacci Quarterly 1999, 37, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gradshteyn, I.; Ryzhik, I. Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, 7th ed.; Elsevier Academic Press: Amsterdam, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  5. Lim, D. A note on a generalization of Riordan combinatorial identity via a hypergeometric series approach. Notes on Number Theory and Discrete Mathematics 2023, 29, 421–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mikić, J. A proof of a famous identity concerning the convolution of the central binomial coefficients. Journal of Integer Sequences 2016, 19, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  7. Prodinger, H. Knuth old sum - a survey. EACTS Bulletin 1994, 52, 232–245. [Google Scholar]
  8. Rathie, K.; Kim, I.; Paris, R.B. A note on a generalization of two well-known combinatorial identities via a hypergeometric series approach. Integers 2022, 22, A28. [Google Scholar]
  9. Riordan, J. Combinatorial Identities; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, 1971. [Google Scholar]
  10. Simons, S. A curious identity. The Mathematical Gazette 2001, 85, 296–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tefera, A.; Zeleke, A. On proofs of generalized Knuth old sum. Integers 2023, 23, A99. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated