Submitted:
28 November 2024
Posted:
29 November 2024
Read the latest preprint version here
Abstract
We give a short proof of the well-known Knuth's old sum and provide some generalizations. Our approach utilizes the binomial theorem and integration formulas derived using the Beta function. Several new polynomial identities and combinatorial identities are derived.
Keywords:
Knuth's old sum
; Reed Dawson identity
; Catalan number
; Beta function
; Combinatorial identity
; polynomial identity
MSC: Primary 05A10; Secondary 05A19
1. Introduction
There appears to be a renewed interest [1,2,5,8,11] in the famous Knuth’s old sum (also known as the Reed Dawson identity),
Many different proofs of this identity and various generalizations exist in the literature (see [7] for a survey).
In this paper we give a very short proof of (1) and offer the following generalization:
where m and n are non-negative integers and, as usual, is the greatest integer less than or equal to z while is the smallest integer greater than or equal to z.
The following special cases of (2) were also reported in Riordan [9, p.72, Problem 4(b)]:
Identity (3) corresponds to setting in (2) and re-labeling m as n; while (4) follows from setting in (2).
In section 5, we will derive the following complements of Knuth’s old sum:
and
Identity (5) is the famous combinatorial identity concerning the convolution of central binomial coefficients. Many different proofs of this identity exist in the literature, (see Mikić [6] and the many references therein).
Identity (2) is itself a particular case of a more general identity, stated in Theorem 2, which has many interesting consequences, including another generalization of Knuth’s old sum, namely,
where v is a real number; as well as simple, apparently new combinatorial identities such as
where, here and throughout this paper,
defined for every non-negative integer j, is a Catalan number.
Based on the binomial theorem, we will derive, in Section 7, some presumably new polynomial identities, including the following:
Identity (6) subsumes Knuth’s old sum (1) (at ), as well as (3) (at ).
Finally, in Section 8, the polynomial identities will facilitate the derivation of apparently new combinatorial identities such as
and
2. Required Identities
In order to give the short proof of Knuth’s old sum, we need a couple of definite integrals which we establish in Lemma 1.
The binomial coefficients are defined, for non-negative integers m and n, by
the number of distinct sets of n objects that can be chosen from m distinct objects.
Generalized binomial coefficients are defined for complex numbers u and v, excluding the set of negative integers, by
where is the Gamma function defined by
and extended to the rest of the complex plain, excluding the non-positive integers, by analytic continuation.
Lemma 1.
Let u and v be complex numbers such that and . Let m be a non-negative integer. Then
and, more generally,
and
Obviously , a symmetry property that is not possessed by .
Proof.
Identities (10) and (11) are immediate consequences of the well-known Beta function integral [4]:
valid for , , with the symmetry property .
Identity (10) is obtained via a simple change of the integration variable from x to y in (12), with .
To prove (11), write
Change the integration variable in the second integral on the right hand side from x to y via ; this gives
and hence (11).
□
Remark 1.
Since, for a real number u,
the stated in (11) is a special case of the following more general result:
which is valid for and .
3. A short proof of Knuth’s old sum
Theorem 1.
If n is a non-negative integer, then
4. A Generalization of Knuth’s Old Sum
In this section we extend (1) by introducing an arbitrary non-negative integer m and a real number v.
Theorem 2.
If m and n are non-negative integers and v is a real number, then
In particular,
Proof.
Since
and
multiplication of the left hand side of (14) by
and the right hand side by
gives
so that
from which (15) now follows by termwise integration from 0 to , according to the parity of n, using Lemma 1.
□
Corollary 1.
If n is a non-negative integer and v is a real number, then
Corollary 2.
If n is a non-negative integer and v is a real number, then
and
Proof.
Proposition 1.
If n is a non-negative integer, then
Proof.
Evaluation of (18) at gives (19) while evaluation at yields (20). In deriving (19), we used the following relationships between binomial coefficients:
and
all of which can be derived by using the Gamma function identities:
and
together with the definition of the generalized binomial coefficients as given in (7). □
Proposition 2.
If m and n are non-negative integers, then
In particular,
and
Proof.
Evaluate (15) at .
□
5. Complements of Knuth’s Old Sum
Theorem 3.
If n is a non-negative integer, then
Proof.
Set and in the binomial theorem
to obtain
from which (28) follows by term-wise integration using Lemma 1. □
Theorem 4.
If n is a non-negative integer, then
Proof.
Set and in the binomial theorem (29) to obtain
from which the stated identity follows by term-wise integration using Lemma 1. □
Next, we present a generalization of (28).
Theorem 5.
If n is a non-negative integer and v is a real number, then
Proof.
Multiply through (30) by and integrate from 0 to , using Lemma 1. □
We conclude this section with a generalization of (5).
Theorem 6.
If n is a non-negative integer and v is a real number, then
Proof.
Multiply through (31) by and integrate from 0 to , using Lemma 1. □
6. Combinatorial Identities Associated with Polynomial Identities of a Certain Type
In this section we derive the combinatorial identities associated with any polynomial identity having the following form:
where m, n, r and s are non-negative integers, and are sequences of non-negative integers, and are sequences, and t is a complex variable. The ellipsis (…) indicates the presence of other parameters and variables.
Theorem 7.
Let be the polynomial identity given in (34). Let u and v be arbitrary complex numbers such that and . Then
In particular,
Proof.
Theorem 8.
Let be the polynomial identity given in (34). Let u and v be arbitrary complex numbers such that and . Then
In particular,
Proof.
Theorem 9.
Let be the polynomial identity given in (34). Let v be an arbitrary complex number such that .
- 1.
-
Suppose that, for every integer j, each of and is a sequence of non-negative integers having a definite parity but such that the parity of is different from the parity of for every integer j.If is an even integer for every integer j, thenwhile if is an odd integer for every integer j, then
- 2.
-
Suppose that, for every integer j, each of and is a sequence of non-negative integers having a definite parity but such that the parity of is different from the parity of for every integer j.If is an even integer for every integer j, thenwhile if is an odd integer for every integer j, then
Proof.
Set in (34) and multiply through by to obtain
from which (39) and (40) follow after term-wise integration from 0 to , using Lemma 1. Identities (41) and (42) are obtained from (39) and (40) since (34) can be written in the following equivalent form:
□
In particular,
-
Suppose that, for every integer j, each of and is a sequence of non-negative integers having a definite parity but such that the parity of is different from the parity of for every integer j.If is an even integer for every integer j, thenwhile if is an odd integer for every integer j, then
-
Suppose that, for every integer j, each of and is a sequence of non-negative integers having a definite parity but such that the parity of is different from the parity of for every integer j.If is an even integer for every integer j, thenwhile if is an odd integer for every integer j, then
Corollary 3.
Let an arbitrary polynomial identity have the following form:
where m, n, r and s are non-negative integers, and are sequences, and t is a complex variable. Let v be an arbitrary real number. Then
and
In particular,
and
7. Polynomial Identities
In this section, by following the procedures outlined in Section 6, we derive new polynomial identities associated with the binomial theorem.
Theorem 10.
Let u and v be arbitrary complex numbers such that and . Let x be a complex variable. If n is a non-negative integer, then
In particular,
Theorem 11.
If n is a non-negative integer, v is a real number and x is a complex variable, then
Corollary 4.
If n is a non-negative integer and x is a complex variable, then
Proof.
Identity (6) on page 6 and identities (56) and (57) correspond to the evaluation of (55) at , and , respectively.
□
Theorem 12.
Let u and v be complex numbers such that and . If n is a non-negative integer, then
Theorem 13.
if n is a non-negative integer, v is a real number and x is a complex variable, then
Proof.
Corollary 5.
If n is a non-negative integer and x is a complex variable, then
Proof.
8. More Combinatorial Identities
8.1. Identities from the Binomial Theorem
Theorem 14.
If n is an integer and v is a real number, then
and
Proof.
Evaluate (55) at and , respectively. □
Proposition 3.
If n is a non-negative integer, then
Proposition 4.
If n is a non-negative integer, then
Proposition 5.
If n is a non-negative integer, then
Theorem 15.
if n is a non-negative integer and v is a real number, then
Proof.
Set in (59). □
Proposition 6.
If n is a non-negative integer, then
Theorem 16.
If n is a non-negative integer and v is a real number, then
and
In particular,
and
8.2. Identities from Waring’s Formulas
Waring’s formula and its dual [3, Equations (22)and (1)] are
and
Identity (82) holds for positive integer n while identity (83) holds for any non-negative integer n.
Theorem 17.
If n is a non-negative integer and v is a real number, then
In particular,
Proof.
Write for x and for y in (82) and multiply through by to obtain
from which upon term-wise integration from 0 to , identity (84) follows.
□
By writing for x and for y, the reader is invited to discover a combinatorial identity associated with (83).
8.3. Identities from an Identity of Simons
Simons [10] proved an identity that is equivalent to the following:
On choosing
and in (47), (48) gives the result stated in the next proposition.
Proposition 7.
If n is a non-negative integer and v is a real number, then
In particular,
The same set of sequences and parameters, etc. that led to (88), when used in (37) gives the following result.
Proposition 8.
If n is a non-negative integer and u and v are real numbers, then
References
- Adegoke, K. Editorial Correction to A note on a generalization of Riordan combinatorial identity via a hypergeometric series approach. Notes on Number Theory and Discrete Mathematics 2024, 30, 211–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alzer, H. Combinatorial identities and hypergeometric functions, II. Discrete Mathematics Letters 2024, 13, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Gould, H.W. The Girard-Waring power sum formulas for symmetric functions and Fibonacci sequences. The Fibonacci Quarterly 1999, 37, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gradshteyn, I.; Ryzhik, I. Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, 7th ed.; Elsevier Academic Press: Amsterdam, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Lim, D. A note on a generalization of Riordan combinatorial identity via a hypergeometric series approach. Notes on Number Theory and Discrete Mathematics 2023, 29, 421–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mikić, J. A proof of a famous identity concerning the convolution of the central binomial coefficients. Journal of Integer Sequences 2016, 19, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Prodinger, H. Knuth old sum - a survey. EACTS Bulletin 1994, 52, 232–245. [Google Scholar]
- Rathie, K.; Kim, I.; Paris, R.B. A note on a generalization of two well-known combinatorial identities via a hypergeometric series approach. Integers 2022, 22, A28. [Google Scholar]
- Riordan, J. Combinatorial Identities; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, 1971. [Google Scholar]
- Simons, S. A curious identity. The Mathematical Gazette 2001, 85, 296–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tefera, A.; Zeleke, A. On proofs of generalized Knuth old sum. Integers 2023, 23, A99. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.