1. Introduction
Our purpose in writing this paper is to derive the following new polynomial identities in
x:
and
In identities (
1) and (
2),
n is a non-negative integer and
x is a complex variable. Identity (
1) holds for complex numbers
r and
s for which
and
s is not a non-positive integer, while (
2) is valid for complex numbers
r and
s such that
and
s is not a negative integer.
Identity (
1) is simpler than, and yet, generalizes Identity (4.13) of Gould’s book [
4, p.47], the latter corresponding to the case
in (
1).
At
, identity (
1) reduces to Frisch’s identity [
3], namely,
while at
, identity (
2) yields Klamkin’s identity:
In a recent paper, Gould and Quaintance [
6] employed the well-known formula of Gauss for the hypergeometric function to give new proofs of (
3) and (
4). More recently, Abel [
1] used the Euler Beta function to give elementary short proofs of (
3) and (
4). Our approach also uses the Beta function and is quite similar to that of Abel. For more historical facts concerning Frisch’s identity and Klamkin’s identity, the reader is referred to Abel [
1] and Gould and Quaintance [
6]. In a recent paper, Adegoke and Frontczak [
2] derived many harmonic and odd harmonic number identities from Frisch’s identity.
Let
m be a non-negative integer and let
u be a complex number. Among other results, we will derive the following respective generalization of Frisch’s identity and Klamkin’s identity:
and
and also establish the following extensions:
and
Binomial coefficients are defined, for non-negative integers
i and
j, by
the number of distinct sets of
j objects that can be chosen from
i distinct objects.
Generalized binomial coefficients are defined for complex numbers
r and
s by
where the Gamma function,
, is defined for
by
and is extended to the rest of the complex plane, excluding the non-positive integers, by analytic continuation.
2. Proof of (1) and (2)
The integration formulas required for proving (
1) and (
2) are given in Lemma 1.
Lemma 1.
If r, k and s are complex numbers and x is a complex variable, then
Proof. The integrals in (
5)– (
8) are immediate consequences of the Beta function,
, defined, as usual, for complex numbers
r and
s such that
and
, by
With the help of the Gamma function, the integral is evaluated as
Note that in obtaining (7) and (
8), we also used
an identity which we will often use without comment in this paper. □
Theorem 1.
If n is a non-negative integer, x is a complex variable and r and s are complex numbers such that and s is not a non-positive integer, then
Proof. Application of the binomial theorem to both sides of
gives
which upon multiplying through by
can also be written as
Thus, term-wise integration gives
from which (
1) follows by (
5) amd (6). □
Theorem 2.
If n is a non-negative integer, x is a complex variable and r and s are complex numbers such that and s is not a negative integer, then
Proof. Raising both sides of
to power
n and expanding via the binomial theorem gives
which, after multiplying through by
, leads to
Performing term-wise integration, we therefore have
and hence (
2) by (7) and (
8). □
3. Combinatorial Identities
In this section we discuss some combinatorial identities that are consequences of (
1) and (
2) and related identities. In particular, we will derive a generalization of each of Frisch’s identity and Klamkin’s identity.
Proposition 1.
If n is a non-negative integer and r and s are complex numbers such that and s is not a non-positive integer, then
Proof. By writing
for
x, identity (
1) can also be written as
from which (
9) is obtained by evaluating at
. □
Remark 1. Identity (9) is the binomial transform of (3).
Proposition 2.
If n is a non-negative integer and r and s are complex numbers such that and s is not a negative integer, then
Obviously, Frisch-type and Klamkin-type combinatorial identities are associated with polynomial identities having the following form:
where
and
are sequences,
and
are sequences of non-negative integers and
,
,
and
are non-negative integers.
3.1. Frisch-type combinatorial identities
Theorem 3.
Let r and s be complex numbers such that and ; where picks the smaller of a and b. If a polynomial identity has the form (13), then the following combinatorial identities hold:
Proof. Multiply through (
13) by
and perform term-wise integration with respect to
x, making use of (
5) and (6), thereby obtaining (
14). Identity (
13) can also be written as
so that identities derived from (
13) remain valid under the following transpositions:
and hence identity (15).
□
We now illustrate Theorem 3 by deriving the Frisch-type identity associated with an identity of Simons.
Lemma 2 (Simons [
8]).
If n is a non-negative integer and x is a complex variable, then
Proposition 3.
If n is a non-negative integer and r and s are complex numbers such that and s is not a non-positive integer, then
Proof. Comparing (
13) and (
16), we find
; and and .
Using these in (
14) gives (
17). □
We can obtain a Frisch-type identity with two binomial coefficients in the denominator, directly from (
1).
Proposition 4.
If n is a non-negative integer and r, s, t and u are complex numbers such that , and s and u are not negative integers, then
Proof. Write
for
x in (
1), multiply through by
and integrate with respect to
x from 0 to 1. □
The reader is invited to discover the combinatorial identity having two binomial coefficients in the denominator associated with (
11) by making appropriate substitutions in Theorem 3.
3.1.1. A generalization of Frisch’s identity
In Theorem 4, we derive a generalization of Frisch’s identity. We require the following known polynomial identity.
Lemma 3 ([
4, Identity (3.18), p.24]).
If n is a non-negative integer, u is a complex number and x and y are complex variables, then
Theorem 4.
If n is a non-negative integer, u is a complex number and r and s are complex numbers such that and s is not a negative integer, then
Proof. Setting
in (
22) gives
so that comparing with (
13), we choose
, and .
Substituting these in (
14) and (15) gives
and
which can also be written in the equivalent forms (
23) and (24) □
Remark 2. Frisch’s identity (3) is obtained by setting in (23) or in (24).
3.2. Klamkin-type combinatorial identities
Theorem 5.
Let r and s be complex numbers such that s is not a negative integer, and ; where picks the greater of a and b. If a polynomial identity has the form (13), then the following combinatorial identities hold:
Proof. Write
for
x in (
13) to obtain
from which, by multiplying through with
, we get
and hence (
26) after term-wise integration. □
Proposition 5.
If n is a non-negative integer and r, s, t and u are complex numbers such that , and s and t are not negative integers, then
Proof.
Consider (
13) and identify
, and and .
Use these in (
26) to obtain (
28).
□
Proposition 6.
If n is a non-negative integer and r and s are complex numbers such that and s is not a negative integer, then
Proof. Set
and
in (
29). □
Our next result is a Klamkin-type identity derived from the identity of Simons (
16).
Proposition 7.
Let n be a non-negative integer. If r and s are complex numbers such that and s is not a negative integer, then
Proof. Use
,
, etc. given in (
18) in Theorem 5. □
The reader is invited to discover the combinatorial identity having two binomial coefficients in the denominator associated with (
11) by making appropriate substitutions in Theorem 5.
3.2.1. A generalization of Klamkin’s identity
We close this section by giving a generalization of Klamkin’s identity.
Theorem 6.
If n is a non-negative integer, u is a complex number and r and s are complex numbers such that and s is not a negative integer, then
Proof. Use
,
, etc. given in (
25) in Theorem 5.
□
Remark 3. Klamkin’s identity (4) is obtained by setting in (32), while in (33) recovers (12).
4. Extensions of Frisch’s identity and Klamkin’s identity
In this section we derive a closed form for the following combinatorial sums:
where
m is a non-negative integer; thereby providing an extension for each of Frisch’s identity (
3) and Klamkin’s identity (
4), the latter corresponding to
. For this purpose we require the results stated in Lemma 4.
Lemma 4.
If m, u and v are non-negative integers, then
Proof. Since
we have
and hence (
34).
□
4.1. An extension of Frisch’s identity
Proposition 8.
If m and n are non-negative integers and r and s are complex numbers such that and s is not a non-positive integer, then
In particular,
and
with the special values
and
Proof. Write
for
x in (
1) and differentiate
m times with respect to
x to obtain
Evaluation at
gives
and hence (
35), in view of Lemma 4.
□
4.2. An extension of Klamkin’s identity
Proposition 9.
If m and n are non-negative integers and r and s are complex numbers such that and s is not a negative integer, then
Proof. Write
for
x in (
2) and proceed as in the proof of Proposition 8. □
4.3. Related identities derived from polynomial identities of a certain type
Theorem 7.
Let a polynomial identity have the following form:
where n is a non-negative integer, x is a complex variable and and are sequences. If m is a non-negative integer, then
Proof. Write
for
x in (
43), differentiate
m times with respect to
x and evaluate at
, using Lemma 4; this gives (
44). To drive (46), write
for
x in (
43), multiply through by
, replace
x by
, differentiate
m times with respect to
x and evaluate at
, using Lemma 4. Identities (45) and (
47) follow from the
symmetry of (
43). □
5. More Combinatorial Identities
This section contains further identities based on the integration formulas in Lemma 1, the evaluated derivatices in Lemma 4 and the identities stated in Theorem 7.
5.1. Identities Derived from the Geometric Progression
Proposition 10.
If n is a non-negative integer and r and s are complex numbers excluding the set of non-positive integers, then
Proof. Multiply through the sum of the geometric progression:
by
to obtain
and hence (
48) by termwise integration. □
Remark 4. The special case of (48) was proved by Rockett [7].
Proposition 11.
If n is a non-negative integer, s is a complex number excluding the set of negative integers and r is a complex number such that , then
Proof. Write
for
x in (
49), replace
x with
and multiply through by
to obtain
and hence (
51). □
5.2. An identity derived from Waring’s formula
Waring’s formula is [
5, Equation (22)]
and holds for a positive integer
n and complex variables
x and
y.
Proposition 12.
If n is a non-negative integer and r and s are complex numbers excluding the set of negative integers and such that , then
Proof. Set
in (
52) and multiply through by
to obtain
from which (
53) follows. □
5.3. More Identities from an Identity of Simons
Proposition 13.
If m and n are non-negative integers, then
Proof. Ue
and
from (
18) in identities (
44) and (46) of Theorem 7. □
Explicit examples from (
54) include
and
while examples from (55) include
and
5.4. Combinatorial identities from an identity of MacMahon
MacMahon’s identity is (Gould [
4, Identity (6.7)], also Sun [
9])
Proposition 14.
If n is a non-negative integer and r and s are complex numbers such that and s is not a non-positive integer, then
Proof. Multiply through (
62) by
and integrate from 0 to 1. □
Proposition 15.
If n is a non-negative integer and m is a positive integer, then
Proof. Write
for
n in (
62) to obtain
from which (
64) follows after replacing
x with
, differentiating
m times with respect to
x and evaluating at
. □
Remark 5.
Setting in (62) gives
References
- U. Abel, A short proof of the binomial identities of Frisch and Klamkin, J. Integer Sequences 23 (2020), Article 20.7.1.
- K. Adegoke and R. Frontczak, Some notes on an identity of Frisch, Open J. Math. Sci. 8 (2024), 216–226. [CrossRef]
- R. Frisch, Sur les semi-invariants et moments employés dans létude des distributions statistiques, Skrifter utgitt av Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi i Oslo, II, Historisk-Filosofisk Klasse, 3 (1926), 1–87. [CrossRef]
- H. W. Gould, Combinatorial Identities, Morgantown, West Virginia, 1972.
- H. W. Gould, The Girard-Waring power sum formulas for symmetric functions and Fibonacci sequences, Fibonacci Quart. 37:2 (1999), 135–140. [CrossRef]
- H. W. Gould and J. Quaintance, On the binomial identities of Frisch and Klamkin, J. Integer Sequences 19 (2016), Article 16.7.7.
- A. M. Rockett, Sums of the inverses of binomial coefficients, Fibonacci Quart. 19:5 (1981), 433–437. [CrossRef]
- S. Simons, A curious identity, Math. Gaz. 85 (2001), 296–298.
- Z. Sun, On sums involving products of three binomial coefficients, Acta Arith. 156:2 (2012), 123–141. [CrossRef]
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).