1. Introduction
In a recent issue of the journal The Fibonacci Quarterly [
12] the second author asked the readers to prove the identity
valid for all complex numbers
a and
b. Although not hard to prove, such an identity provides an unusual but useful link between sums with and without binomial coefficients.
Our purpose in this paper is to derive a generalization of (
1) involving an additional (that is third) complex parameter. Polynomial combinatorial identities are equations that express relations between polynomials and combinatorial quantities. These identities usually involve sums of polynomial terms weighted by quantities like binomial coefficients, falling or rising factorials or other counting numbers. Common examples are the binomial or multinomial theorem. Polynomial identities with a complex parameter in the binomial coefficient are not unusual and can be found in the literature. Examples for such identities were derived in the articles by Boyadzhiev [
4], Wang and Wei [
25] or Chen and Guo [
6], for instance. Identities with two or even three complex parameters also exist but are rare. Two particular examples that come to mind are the Chu-Vandermonde identity and Hagen-Rothe identities [
7,
8,
16]: For complex numbers
x and
y, and non-negative integers
m and
n the Chu-Vandermonde identity is
of which
is a special case. The Hagen-Rothe identities are similar. Still other sums related to ours were also studied by Egorychev [
11] and Lyapin and S. Chandragiri [
21].
Our three parameter generalization of (
1) consists of two separate identities presented in a main lemma in the third section. These identities will turn out to be immensely rich and will allow us to deduce a big amount of important results as basic properties. These results will come from four different fields: polynomial identities, trigonometric sums, sums involving the Horadam sequence, and combinatorial identities. In the field of combinatorial identities we will focus on three different classes: Frisch-type identities, Klamkin-type identities and combinatorial sums involving powers of integers.
2. Preliminaries
Before presenting our main results, we first collect several preliminary identities that will be frequently used later.
Lemma 1.
If k and n are integers and x is a complex number, then
Proof. Identity (
2) follows directly from the
transformation. □
Proof. These are consequences of the generalized binomial coefficients. They are easy to derive using the Gamma function. They can also be found in Gould’s book [
13]. □
Next, we recall some facts about Horadam sequences that will be needed later. The Horadam sequence
is defined, for all integers, by the recurrence relation [
18]
with
where
a,
b,
p and
q are arbitrary complex numbers with
,
, and
. The sequence
generalizes many important number and polynomial sequences, for instance, the Fibonacci sequence
, the Lucas sequence
, the Pell sequence
, the Chebyshev polynomials of the first and second kind given by
and
, and so on. The
j-th term of a Horadam sequence is given by
where
and
and
are given by
where
, so that
.
The sequences
and
are classical sequences and are indexed as sequences A000045 and A000032 in the On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences [
23]. Koshy [
19] and Vajda [
24] have written excellent books on them. In addition, the sequences
and
are called the Lucas sequences of the first kind and the second kind, respectively. Their explicit forms equal
Finally, we mention the gibonacci sequence (or generalized Fibonacci sequence)
. This sequence was studied by Horadam [
17] in 1961 under the notation
. Terms of the gibonacci sequence can be accessed directly through the Binet-like formula:
where
,
, and
and
. It is readily established that
Lemma 3.
For all we have the relations
and more generally
Proof. The statements can be verified directly by computation working with (respectively ) and . □
Lemma 4.
For all integers and t we have
3. The Main Lemma and Its Immediate Consequences
Lemma 5.
If a, b and x are complex numbers and n is a non-negative integer, then
Proof. We have
Therefore,
and thus
This completes the proof. □
When
then identity (
13) reduces to (
1), which with
and
gives the classical identity [
4]
with
being the
nth harmonic number. Similarly, by setting
,
and
in identity (
13), we obtain
It follows from
that
Note that the left-hand side of the equation above is
hence we have
The last expression is also known. It is stated, for instance, in the book [
10] as Exercise 27 in Chapter 2 (p.105).
The additional complex parameter x in the binomial coefficient provides a very rich source for various combinatorial identities. A first immediate consequence of the main Lemma 5 is the following result:
Theorem 1.
If n is a non-negative integer and a and x are complex numbers, then
Proof. Set
in (
13) and (
14) and simplify. □
Another instant consequence are the following identities.
Theorem 2.
If n is a non-negative integer and a and x are complex numbers, then
Proof. Identity (
17) is obtained by setting
in (
13) and writing
for
a. Identity () follows from differentiating (
17) with respect to
a and multiplying through by
a. □
We also get immediately the next known result.
Theorem 3.
If a and x are complex numbers and n is a non-negative integer, then
Proof. Differentiate (
13) with respect to
a and write
for
a. □
Remark 1. Identity (19) is not new and can be found in a different form in Gould’s compendium [13] as equation (1.10). It is also recorded by Chu [9].
Another important consequence is the next theorem.
Theorem 4.
If n is a non-negative integer and x is a complex number and a is a complex variable, then
In particular, we have
Proof. Add (
13) and (
14) and write
for
a. The particular case follows by substituting
in (
20). □
Proposition 1.
If n is a non-negative integer and a is a complex variable, then
Proof. Identity (
22) is obtained by setting
in (
20). Identity (
23) follows upon setting
in (
20) and using Lemma 1, while (
24) follows from
. Note that in deriving (
23) we used the equation (
15). Identity (26) comes from setting
in (
24). □
Remark 2. Identities (22) and (23) will be called dual identities. We also note that setting in (20) gives the binomial transform of the binomial theorem.
The next theorem generalizes (
19).
Theorem 5.
If m is a positive integer, n is a non-negative integer, x is a complex number and a is a complex variable, then
Proof. The proof is by induction on
m. The base case,
, is valid because it is the derivative of (
20). Assume the truth of the hypothesis (
27). Differentiating (
27) with respect to
a shows that the identity is valid for
whenever it is valid for
m and the proof is complete. Note that
□
By using the identity
and shifting the summation index, equation (
27) can be simplified into
Remark 3. Any identity derived from (27) remains valid under the interchange . Similarly, the interchange leaves any identity derived from (28) valid.
Substituting
and
into equation (
28) yields the following results:
Proposition 2.
If m is a positive integer, n is a non-negative integer and x is a complex number, then
Evaluation at , on account of Lemma 2, yields the following combinatorial identities.
Proposition 3.
If m is a positive integer and n is a non-negative integer, then
Remark 4.
By shifting the summation index it is not difficult to show that (29) also contains
as a special case. The combinatorial sum (31) can be found in Riordan’s book [22] p.130. In addition we have from (30) its counterpart
Proposition 4.
If m and n are non-negative integers such that , then
In particular, for all ,
which is a well-known classical combinatorial identity that appears in numerous references; for instance, see equation (2.3.2) in [10].
Proof. Set
in (
28), use Lemma 1, shift the summation index and set
. □
Using the summation identity
together with (
28), we obtain the following result:
Proposition 5.
Let m be a positive integer, n a non-negative integer, x a complex number and a a complex variable. Then
Theorem 6.
If m and n are non-negative integers, x is a complex number and a is a complex variable, then
Proof. The proof is by induction on
m. The base case,
, is identity (
20). Now assume the veracity of (
33), the induction hypothesis, for a non-negative integer
m. Replacing
a with
t and integrating with respect to
t from 0 to
a shows that (
33) holds for
whenever it holds for
m. Note that
□
Remark 5.
Identity (33) is also valid under the interchange stated in Remark 3. Thus, for example, we have
Proposition 6.
If m and n are non-negative integers and a is a complex variable, then
Proof. Set
in (
34) and use Lemma 1. □
Remark 6. Identity (35) is equivalent to Gould [13] Identity (4.13), p.47.
Substituting
into (
33) yields the following result.
Proposition 7.
If m and n are non-negative integers and x is a complex number, then
Proposition 8.
If m and n are non-negative integers, then
Proof. Set
in (
36) and use Lemma 2. □
Substituting
,
, and
into (
33), and applying Lemma 1, we obtain the following results.
Proposition 9.
If m and n are non-negative integers and a is a complex variable, then
Proposition 10.
If m and n are non-negative integers, x is a complex number and a and b are complex variables, then
The next three sections are dedicated to illustrating important basic applications of the combinatorial identities derived in this section. We will explore three primary fields: identities involving trigonometric functions, identities related to Horadam sequence and finally, we will consider three certain types of combinatorial identities.
4. Some Trigonometric Identities
In this section we derive some possibly new trigonometric identities.
Proposition 11.
If n is a non-negative integer, x is a complex number and θ is a real number, then
Proof. Set
in the main identity (
20) and use Euler’s formula
together with
Compare the real and imaginary parts. This completes the proof. □
Corollary 1.
If n is a non-negative integer and θ is a real number, then
and
Proof. Set in Proposition 11. □
Corollary 2.
If n is a non-negative integer and θ is a real number, then
and
Proof. Set in Proposition 11, use Lemma 1, and simplify. □
Corollary 3.
If n is a non-negative integer and θ is a real number, then
and
Proof. Set in Proposition 11, use Lemma 2, and simplify. □
Corollary 4.
If n is a non-negative integer and θ is a real number, then
and
Proof. Set in Proposition 11, use Lemma 2, and simplify. □
Proposition 12.
Let n be a non-negative integer, x a complex number and θ a real number. If , then
If , then
Proof. Set
and
, in turn, in the main identity (
20) and simplify. □
Proposition 13.
If n is a non-negative integer, x is a complex number and θ is a real number, then
and
Proof. Set
and
, in turn, in the main identity (
20) and simplify. □
To avoid repetitions we omit the special cases.
5. Identities Involving Horadam Sequences
In this section we state new identities involving Horadam sequences
introduced in
Section 2.
Proposition 14.
If n is a non-negative integer, x is a complex number, t is an integer, and r, s are positive integers, then
In particular,
Proof. Set
in (
20). Then Lemma 3 yields
Similarly, with
in (
20) in conjunction with Lemma 3 we obtain
The identity follows upon multiplying (
44) and (
45) by
, respectively
, and combining according to the Binet form (
12). The special case is obtained by setting
. □
Proposition 15.
If m and n are non-negative integers, r is an integer and x is a complex number, then
In particular,
with the special value
which has the interesting property that it is its own binomial transform.
Proof. Set
and
in (
37). □
Remark 7.
In view of Remark 3, identity (46) also implies
In particular, at we obtain
Remark 8. These results should be regarded as basic. To keep the paper readable we do not state the spacial cases. We can obtain more general results by utilizing Lemma 4.
6. Combinatorial Identities
Lemma 6.
If r, k and s are complex numbers and x is a complex variable, then
Proof. The integrals in (
47)– (
50) are immediate consequences of the Beta function,
, defined, as usual, for complex numbers
r and
s such that
and
, by
With the help of the Gamma function, the integral is evaluated as
Note that in obtaining () and (
50), we also used
an identity which we will often use without comment in this paper. □
6.1. Frisch-type identities
The following combinatorial identity is attributed to Frisch [
1,
2,
14,
15]:
Here, we derive generalizations and variants of this identity.
Theorem 7.
If m is a positive integer, n is a non-negative integer, r and s are complex numbers such that and s is not a non-positive integer and x is a complex number, then
and
Proof. Write
for
a in (
27) and multiply through by
to obtain
and hence (
52) after term-wise integration from 0 to 1 with respect to
a by (
47) and (48). Identity (
53) follows from (
52) by the
symmetry of (
27). □
Corollary 5.
If m and n are non-negative integers and r and s are complex numbers such that and s is not a non-positive integer, then
and
Proof. Set
in Theorem 7 and use (
3). Note that
in Theorem 7 removes the singularity at
on account of (
3). □
Remark 9. Identity (55) generalizes Frisch’s identity (51) to which it reduces at . In addition, new combinatorial identities can be derived by setting in Corollary 5. We leave this little exercise to the interested reader.
Corollary 6.
If m is a positive integer, n is a non-negative integer, r and s are complex numbers such that and s is not a non-positive integer, then
Proof. Set in Theorem 7. □
Corollary 7.
If m is a positive integer, n is a non-negative integer, r and s are complex numbers such that and s is not a non-positive integer, then
Proof. Set in Theorem 7. □
Proposition 16.
If m and n are non-negative integers and s is a complex number such that and s is not a non-positive integer, then
Proof. Set in Corollary 5. □
Proposition 17.
If m and n are non-negative integers and s is a complex number such that and s is not a non-positive integer, then
Proof. Set in Corollary 5. □
Proposition 18.
If m is a positive integer, n is a non-negative integer, s is a complex number such that and s is not a non-positive integer, then
Proof. Set in Corollary 6. □
Proposition 19.
If m is a positive integer, n is a non-negative integer, s is a complex number such that and s is not a non-positive integer, then
Proof. Set in Corollary 6. □
Proposition 20.
If m is a positive integer, n is a non-negative integer, s is a complex number such that and s is not a non-positive integer, then
Proof. Set in Corollary 7. □
Proposition 21.
If m is a positive integer, n is a non-negative integer, s is a complex number such that and s is not a non-positive integer, then
Proof. Set in Corollary 7. □
Remark 10. Again, four additional interesting special cases will come from setting in Corollaries 6 and 7.
6.2. Klamkin-Type identities
The identity
is attributed to Klamkin [
1,
14,
15]. Here, we derive generalizations and variants of this identity.
Theorem 8.
Let m be a positive integer, n a non-negative integer, r and s complex numbers such that and s is not a negative integer. Let x be a complex number. Then
and
Proof. Multiply through (
27) by
and integrate term-wise from 0 to 1 using (49) and (
50). □
Corollary 8.
Let m be a non-negative integer, n a non-negative integer, r and s complex numbers such that and s is not a negative integer. Then
and
Proof. Set
in Theorem 8. Again, note that the singularity at
was removed by virtue of (
3). □
Remark 11. Identity (76) reduces to Klamkin’s identity (72) at . The choices in Corollary 8 will yield two additional sums.
Corollary 9.
Let m be a positive integer, n a non-negative integer, r and s complex numbers such that and s is not a negative integer. Then
Proof. Set in Theorem 8. □
Corollary 10.
Let m be a positive integer, n a non-negative integer, r and s complex numbers such that and s is not a negative integer. Then
Proof. Set in Theorem 8. □
Proposition 22.
Let m be a non-negative integer, n a non-negative integer, s a complex number such that and s is not a negative integer. Then
Proof. Set in Corollary 8. □
Proposition 23.
Let m be a non-negative integer, n a non-negative integer, s is a complex number such that and s is not a negative integer. Then
Proof. Set in Corollary 8. □
Proposition 24.
Let m be a positive integer, n a non-negative integer, s is a complex number such that and s is not a negative integer. Then
Proof. Set in Corollary 9. □
Proposition 25.
Let m be a positive integer, n a non-negative integer, s is a complex number such that and s is not a negative integer. Then
Proof. Set in Corollary 9. □
Proposition 26.
Let m be a positive integer, n a non-negative integer, s is a complex number such that and s is not a negative integer. Then
Proof. Set in Corollary 10. □
Proposition 27.
Let m be a positive integer, n a non-negative integer, s is a complex number such that and s is not a negative integer. Then
Proof. Set in Corollary 10. □
Remark 12. Again, four additional interesting special cases will come from setting in Corollaries 9 and 10.
6.3. Combinatorial identities involving powers of integers
Lemma 7.
If r and k are non-negative integers, then
Proof. Since
we have
and hence (
93).
□
Remark 13.
The evaluated derivatives in (93) can also be expressed as
where are the Stirling numbers of the second kind, defined by
and having the useful property
Theorem 9.
If x is a complex number, m is a positive integer and n and r are non-negative integers, then
and
Proof. Write
for
a in (
27), differentiate
r times with respect to
a and evaluate at
to obtain
which can be written as (
95) after shifting indices. Identity (
96) follows from (
95) by symmetry. □
Corollary 11.
If m is a positive integer and n and r are non-negative integers, then
Proof. Set
in (
95) and (
96) and use (
3). □
Remark 14.
Identity (98) generalizes the known identity (consult for instance [3,20])
to which it reduces at and which expresses the sum of powers of integers in terms of Stirling numbers of the second kind.
Remark 15. Setting in Theorem 9 will yield two other interesting sums.
7. Conclusions
The motivation for writing this paper was Problem B-1358 in the 2024 issue of the Fibonacci Quarterly [
12]. What we considered initially more or less a note, turned out to be a very powerful result. Our generalized identities presented in Lemma 5 enabled us to provide a range of applications to four different fields: polynomial identities, trigonometric identities, identities involving Horadam numbers, and combinatorial identities. In each field we have found generalizations of existing results. Our findings dealing with Frisch-type identities, Klamkin-type identities and power sums are important examples of such generalizations. It is worth mentioning, however, that there are gaps remaining. As indicated in Remarks 8, 9-12, and 15 more appealing results are still to be discovered. This is left as a potential future work.
References
- U. Abel, A short proof of the binomial identities of Frisch and Klamkin. J. Integer Sequences 2020, 23, Article 20.7.1.
- K. Adegoke and R. Frontczak, Some notes on an identity of Frisch. Open J. Math. Sci. 2024, 8, 216–226. [CrossRef]
- K. N. Boyadzhiev, Power sum identities with generalized Stirling numbers. Fibonacci Quart. 2008/2009, 46/47, 326–330.
- K. N. Boyadzhiev, The Euler series transformation and the binomial identities. Integers 2010, 10, #A22, 265–271.
- K. N. Boyadzhiev, Notes on the Binomial Transform, World Scientific, (2018).
- Y. Chen and D. Guo, Combinatorial identities concerning harmonic numbers, Quart. J. Math. 2024, 39, 307–314.
- W. Chu, Elementary Proofs for Convolution Identities of Abel and Hagen–Rothe. Electron. J. Combin. 2010, 17, #N24.
- W. Chu, Hagen–Rothe convolution identities through Lagrange interpolations, Discrete Math. Lett. 2013, 12, 1–5.
- W. Chu, Abel’s convolution formulae through Taylor polynomials. Maltepe J. Math. 2023, V (2), 4751.
- Ch. Chuan-Chong and K. Khee-Meng, Principles and Techniques in Combinatorics, World Scientific, (1992).
- G. P. Egorychev, Combinatorial identity from the theory of integral representations in Cn, Irkutsk Gos. Univ. Mat. 4 (2011), 32–44 (in Russian).
- R. Frontczak, Elementary Problems and Solutions, Problem B-1358 (edited by Harris Kwong), Fibonacci Quart. 2024, 62, 329–336.
- H. W. Gould, Combinatorial Identities, Published by the author, revised edition, (1972).
- H. W. Gould and J. Quaintance, Bernoulli numbers and a new binomial transform identity. J. Integer Sequences 2014, 17, Article 14.2.2.
- H. W. Gould and J. Quaintance, On the binomial identities of Frisch and Klamkin. J. Integer Sequences 2016, 19, Article 16.7.7.
- V. J. W. Guo, Bijective proofs of Gould’s and Rothe’s identities. Discrete Math. 2008, 308, 1756–1759. [CrossRef]
- A. F. Horadam, A generalized Fibonacci sequence. American Math. Monthly 1961, 68, 455–459. [CrossRef]
- A. F. Horadam, Basic properties of a certain generalized sequence of numbers. Fibonacci Quart. 1965, 3, 161–176. [CrossRef]
- T. Koshy, Fibonacci and Lucas Numbers with Applications, Wiley-Interscience, 2001.
- D. Laissaoui, An explicit formula for sums of powers of integers in terms of Stirling numbers. J. Integer Sequences 2017, 20, Article 17.4.8.
- A. P Lyapin and S. Chandragiri, Generating functions for vector partition functions and a basic recurrence relation. J. Difference Equ. Appl. 25, 1052–1061.
- J. Riordan, Combinatorial identities, R. E. Krieger Publishing Co., (1979).
- N. J. A. Sloane (editor), The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, 2022. Available at https://oeis.org.
- S. Vajda, Fibonacci and Lucas Numbers, and the Golden Section: Theory and Applications, Dover Press, 2008.
- J. Wang and C. Wei, Derivative operator and summation formulae involving generalized harmonic numbers. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2016, 434, 315–341. [CrossRef]
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).