1. Introduction
There appears to be a renewed interest [
1,
2,
5,
8,
11] in the famous Knuth’s old sum (also known as the Reed Dawson identity),
Many different proofs of this identity and various generalizations exist in the literature (see [
7] for a survey).
In this paper we give a very short proof of (
1.1) and offer the following generalization:
where
m and
n are non-negative integers and, as usual,
is the greatest integer less than or equal to
z while
is the smallest integer greater than or equal to
z.
The following special cases of (
1.2) were also reported in Riordan [
9] p.72, Problem 4(b)]:
Identity (
1.3) corresponds to setting
in (
1.2) and re-labeling
m as
n; while (
1.4) follows from setting
in (
1.2).
In
Section 5, we will derive the following complements of Knuth’s old sum:
and
Identity (
1.5) is the famous combinatorial identity concerning the convolution of central binomial coefficients. Many different proofs of this identity exist in the literature, (see Mikić [
6] and the many references therein).
Identity (
1.2) is itself a particular case of a more general identity, stated in Theorem 2, which has many interesting consequences, including another generalization of Knuth’s old sum, namely,
where
v is a real number; as well as simple, apparently new combinatorial identities such as
where, here and throughout this paper,
defined for every non-negative integer
j, is a Catalan number.
Based on the binomial theorem, we will derive, in
Section 7, some presumably new polynomial identities, including the following:
Identity (
1.6) subsumes Knuth’s old sum (
1.1) (at
), as well as (
1.3) (at
).
Finally, in
Section 8, the polynomial identities will facilitate the derivation of apparently new combinatorial identities such as
and
2. Required Identities
In order to give the short proof of Knuth’s old sum, we need a couple of definite integrals which we establish in Lemma 1.
The binomial coefficients are defined, for non-negative integers
m and
n, by
the number of distinct sets of
n objects that can be chosen from
m distinct objects.
Generalized binomial coefficients are defined for complex numbers
u and
v, excluding the set of negative integers, by
where
is the Gamma function defined by
and extended to the rest of the complex plain, excluding the non-positive integers, by analytic continuation.
Lemma 1.
Let u and v be complex numbers such that and . Let m be a non-negative integer. Then
and, more generally,
and
Obviously , a symmetry property that is not possessed by .
Proof. Identities (
2.4) and (
2.5) are immediate consequences of the well-known Beta function integral [
4, Entry 3.621.5, Page 397]:
valid for
,
, with the symmetry property
.
Identity (
2.4) is obtained via a simple change of the integration variable from
x to
y in (
2.6), with
.
To prove (
2.5), write
Change the integration variable in the second integral on the right hand side from
x to
y via
; this gives
and hence (
2.5).
□
Remark 1.
Since, for a real number u,
the stated in (2.5) is a special case of the following more general result:
which is valid for and .
3. A Short Proof of Knuth’s Old Sum
Theorem 1.
If n is a non-negative integer, then
Proof. Substitute
for
y in the binomial theorem
to obtain
Thus
and hence (
1.1) on account of (
2.2) and (
2.3). □
4. A Generalization of Knuth’s Old Sum
In this section we extend (
1.1) by introducing an arbitrary non-negative integer
m and a real number
v.
Theorem 2.
If m and n are non-negative integers and v is a real number, then
Proof. Since
and
multiplication of the left hand side of (
3.1) by
and the right hand side by
gives
so that
from which (
4.1) now follows by termwise integration from 0 to
, according to the parity of
n, using Lemma 1.
□
Corollary 3.
If n is a non-negative integer and v is a real number, then
Corollary 4.
If n is a non-negative integer and v is a real number, then
Proof. Identity (
4.3) is obtained by setting
in (
4.1) and re-labeling
m as
n while (
4.4) is the evaluation of (
4.1) at
with a re-labeling of
m as
n. □
Proposition 1.
If n is a non-negative integer, then
Proof. Evaluation of (
4.4) at
gives (
4.5) while evaluation at
yields (
4.6). In deriving (
4.5), we used the following relationships between binomial coefficients:
and
all of which can be derived by using the Gamma function identities:
and
together with the definition of the generalized binomial coefficients as given in (
2.1). □
Proposition 2.
If m and n are non-negative integers, then
Proof. Evaluate (
4.1) at
.
□
5. Complements of Knuth’s Old Sum
Theorem 5.
If n is a non-negative integer, then
Proof. Set
and
in the binomial theorem
to obtain
from which (
5.1) follows by term-wise integration using Lemma 1. □
Theorem 6.
If n is a non-negative integer, then
Proof. Set
and
in the binomial theorem (
5.2) to obtain
from which the stated identity follows by term-wise integration using Lemma 1. □
Next, we present a generalization of (
5.1).
Theorem 7.
If n is a non-negative integer and v is a real number, then
Proof. Multiply through (
5.3) by
and integrate from 0 to
, using Lemma 1. □
We conclude this section with a generalization of (
1.5).
Theorem 8.
If n is a non-negative integer and v is a real number, then
Proof. Multiply through (
5.4) by
and integrate from 0 to
, using Lemma 1. □
6. Combinatorial Identities Associated with Polynomial Identities of a Certain Type
In this section we derive the combinatorial identities associated with any polynomial identity having the following form:
where
m,
n,
r and
s are non-negative integers,
and
are sequences of non-negative integers,
and
are sequences, and
t is a complex variable. The ellipsis (…) indicates the presence of other parameters and variables.
Theorem 9.
Let be the polynomial identity given in (6.1). Let u and v be arbitrary complex numbers such that and . Then
Proof. Write
for
t in (
6.1) and multiply through by
to obtain
from which (
6.2) follows after integrating from 0 to 1, using the Beta function (variant of (
2.6)):
for
and
. □
Theorem 10.
Let be the polynomial identity given in (6.1). Let u and v be arbitrary complex numbers such that , , and for every non-negative integer j. Then
and
Proof. Substituting
in (
6.1) and multiplying through by
gives
Writing
for
x and
for
y in (
6.9), multiplying through by
and integrating from 0 to
using Lemma 1 gives (
6.5). Identity (
6.6) follows from the fact that the transformation
followed by
causes (
6.1) to become
□
Theorem 11.
Let be the polynomial identity given in (6.1). Let u and v be arbitrary complex numbers such that , , and for every non-negative integer j. Then
Proof. Set
in (
6.9) and multiply through by
to obtain
which upon integration from 0 to 1, using (
6.4), gives (
6.10). □
Theorem 12.
Let be the polynomial identity given in (6.1). Let u and v be arbitrary complex numbers such that and . Then
Proof. Write
for
t in (
6.1) and multiply through by
to obtain
from which (
6.12) follows upon integration from 0 to
using Lemma 1. □
Theorem 13. Let be the polynomial identity given in (6.1). Let v be an arbitrary complex number such that .
-
Suppose that, for every integer j, each of and is a sequence of non-negative integers having a definite parity but such that the parity of is different from the parity of for every integer j.
If is an even integer for every integer j, then
while if is an odd integer for every integer j, then
-
Suppose that, for every integer j, each of and is a sequence of non-negative integers having a definite parity but such that the parity of is different from the parity of for every integer j.
If is an even integer for every integer j, then
while if is an odd integer for every integer j, then
Proof. Set
in (
6.1) and multiply through by
to obtain
from which (
6.14) and (
6.15) follow after term-wise integration from 0 to
, using Lemma 1. Identities (
6.16) and (
6.17) are obtained from (
6.14) and (
6.15) since (
6.1) can be written in the following equivalent form:
□
In particular,
-
Suppose that, for every integer j, each of and is a sequence of non-negative integers having a definite parity but such that the parity of is different from the parity of for every integer j.
If
is an even integer for every integer
j, then
while if
is an odd integer for every integer
j, then
-
Suppose that, for every integer j, each of and is a sequence of non-negative integers having a definite parity but such that the parity of is different from the parity of for every integer j.
If
is an even integer for every integer
j, then
while if
is an odd integer for every integer
j, then
Corollary 14.
Let an arbitrary polynomial identity have the following form:
where m, n, r and s are non-negative integers, and are sequences, and t is a complex variable. Let v be an arbitrary real number. Then
7. Polynomial Identities
In this section, by following the procedures outlined in
Section 6, we derive new polynomial identities associated with the binomial theorem.
Theorem 15.
Let u and v be arbitrary complex numbers such that and . Let x be a complex variable. If n is a non-negative integer, then
Proof. Consider the following variation on the binomial theorem:
Use (
6.2) with
to obtain (
7.1).
□
Theorem 16.
If n is a non-negative integer, v is a real number and x is a complex variable, then
Proof. On account of (
6.22) and with (
7.3) in mind, use (
6.23) with
to obtain (
7.4).
□
Corollary 17.
If n is a non-negative integer and x is a complex variable, then
Proof. Identity (
1.6) on page 2 and identities (
7.5) and (
7.6) correspond to the evaluation of (
7.4) at
,
and
, respectively.
In deriving (
7.5), we used (
4.7)–(
4.10) to obtain
and
□
Theorem 18.
Let u and v be complex numbers such that and . If n is a non-negative integer, then
Proof. With (
7.3) in mind, use
and
in (
6.12). □
Corollary 19.
If n is a non-negative integer, then
Proof. Evaluate (
7.7) at
and at
. □
Theorem 20.
if n is a non-negative integer, v is a real number and x is a complex variable, then
Proof. Consider another variation on the binomial theorem:
This identity has the form of (
6.22). Use (
6.23) with
to obtain (
7.10).
□
Corollary 21.
If n is a non-negative integer and x is a complex variable, then
Proof. Identities (
7.12), (
7.13) and (
7.14) correspond to the evaluation of (
7.10) at
,
and
, respectively.
□
Remark 2. The reader is invited to employ (6.2) and (6.12) to discover more polynomial identities associated with (7.11).
8. More Combinatorial Identities
8.1. Identities from the Binomial Theorem
Theorem 22.
Let u and v be complex numbers such that and . if n is a non-negative integer, then
Theorem 23.
If n is an integer and v is a real number, then
Proof. Evaluate (
7.4) at
and
, respectively. □
Remark 3. Setting in (7.4) reproduces identity (4.2) while setting reproduces (4.3).
Proposition 3.
If n is a non-negative integer, then
Proof. Set
in identities (
1.6), (
7.5) and (
7.6). □
Proposition 4.
If n is a non-negative integer, then
Proof. Set
in identities (
1.6), (
7.5) and (
7.6). □
Proposition 5.
If n is a non-negative integer, then
Proof. Set
in identities (
1.6), (
7.5) and (
7.6). □
Theorem 24.
if n is a non-negative integer and v is a real number, then
Proposition 6.
If n is a non-negative integer, then
Proof. Set
in each of identities (
7.12)– (
7.14) or what is the same thing,
,
and
in (
8.12).
□
Theorem 25.
If n is a non-negative integer and v is a real number, then
Proof. Since
the binomial theorem gives
so that
and, therefore,
Integrating from 0 to
using Lemma 1 gives (
8.16) while multiplying through by
and integrating from 0 to
gives (
8.17).
□
8.2. Identities from Waring’s Formulas
Waring’s formula and its dual [
3, Equations (22) and (1)] are
and
Identity (
8.20) holds for positive integer
n while identity (
8.21) holds for any non-negative integer
n.
Theorem 26.
If n is a non-negative integer and v is a real number, then
Proof. Write
for
x and
for
y in (
8.20) and multiply through by
to obtain
from which upon term-wise integration from 0 to
, identity (
8.22) follows.
□
By writing
for
x and
for
y, the reader is invited to discover a combinatorial identity associated with (
8.21).
8.3. Identities from an Identity of Simons
Simons [
10] proved an identity that is equivalent to the following:
On choosing
and
in (
6.22), (
6.23) gives the result stated in the next proposition.
Proposition 7.
If n is a non-negative integer and v is a real number, then
The same set of sequences and parameters,
etc. that led to (
8.26), when used in (
6.12) gives the following result.
Proposition 8.
If n is a non-negative integer and u and v are real numbers, then
References
- K. Adegoke. Editorial Correction to A note on a generalization of Riordan combinatorial identity via a hypergeometric series approach. Notes on Number Theory and Discrete Mathematics 2024, 30(1), 211–212. [Google Scholar]
- H. Alzer. Combinatorial identities and hypergeometric functions, II. Discrete Mathematics Letters 2024, 13, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- H. W. Gould. The Girard-Waring power sum formulas for symmetric functions and Fibonacci sequences. The Fibonacci Quarterly 1999, 37(2), 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- I. Gradshteyn and I. Ryzhik. Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, 7th edition; Elsevier Academic Press: Amsterdam, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- D. Lim. A note on a generalization of Riordan combinatorial identity via a hypergeometric series approach. Notes on Number Theory and Discrete Mathematics 2023, 29(3), 421–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- J. Mikić. A proof of a famous identity concerning the convolution of the central binomial coefficients. Journal of Integer Sequences 2016, 19, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- H. Prodinger. Knuth old sum - a survey. EACTS Bulletin 1994, 52, 232–245. [Google Scholar]
- A. K. Rathie, I. Kim and R. B. Paris. A note on a generalization of two well-known combinatorial identities via a hypergeometric series approach. Integers 2022, 22, #A28. [Google Scholar]
- J. Riordan. Combinatorial Identities; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, 1971. [Google Scholar]
- S. Simons. A curious identity. The Mathematical Gazette 2001, 85, 296–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- A. Tefera and A. Zeleke. On proofs of generalized Knuth old sum. Integers 2023, 23, #A99. [Google Scholar]
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).