1. Introduction
There appears to be a renewed interest [
1,
2,
4,
6,
8] in the famous Knuth’s old sum (also known as the Reed Dawson identity),
Many different proofs of this identity and various generalizations exist in the literature (see [
5] for a survey).
In this paper we give a very short proof of (1.1) and offer the following generalization:
where
m and
n are non-negative integers and, as usual,
is the greatest integer less than or equal to
z while
is the smallest integer greater than or equal to
z.
The following special cases of (1.2) were also reported in Riordan [
7], p.72, Problem 4(b)]:
Identity (1.3) corresponds to setting
in (1.2) and re-labeling
m as
n; while (1.4) follows from setting
in (1.2).
Identity (1.2) is itself a particular case of a more general identity, stated in Theorem 2, which has many interesting consequences, including another generalization of Knuth’s old sum, namely,
for a real number
v, as well as simple, apparently new combinatorial identities such as
where, here and throughout this paper,
defined for every non-negative integer
j, is a Catalan number.
Based on the binomial theorem, we will derive, in
Section 5, some presumably new polynomial identities, including the following:
Identity (1.5) subsumes Knuth’s old sum (1.1) (at
), as well as (1.3) (at
).
Finally, in
Section 6, the polynomial identities will facilitate the derivation of apparently new combinatorial identities such as
and
2. Required Identities
In order to give the short proof of Knuth’s old sum, we need a couple of definite integrals which we establish in Lemma 1.
The binomial coefficients are defined, for non-negative integers
m and
n, by
the number of distinct sets of
n objects that can be chosen from
m distinct objects.
Generalized binomial coefficients are defined for complex numbers
u and
v, excluding the set of negative integers, by
where
is the Gamma function defined by
and extended to the rest of the complex plain, excluding the non-positive integers, by analytic continuation.
Lemma 1.
Let u and v be complex numbers such that and . Let m be a non-negative integer. Then
and, more generally,
and
Obviously , a symmetry property that is not possessed by .
Proof. Identities (2.4) and (2.5) are immediate consequences of the well-known Beta function integral ([
3] Entry 3.621.5, Page 397):
valid for
,
, with the symmetry property
.
Identity (2.4) is obtained via a simple change of the integration variable from x to y in (2.6), with .
To prove (2.5), write
Change the integration variable in the second integral on the right hand side from
x to
y via
; this gives
and hence (2.5).
□
Remark 1.
Since, for a real number u,
the stated in (2.5) is a special case of the following more general result:
which is valid for and .
3. A Short Proof of Knuth’s Old Sum
Theorem 1.
If n is a non-negative integer, then
Proof. Substitute
for
y in the binomial theorem
to obtain
Thus
and hence (1.1) on account of (2.2) and (2.3). □
4. A Generalization of Knuth’s Old Sum
In this section we extend (1.1) by introducing an arbitrary non-negative integer m and a real number v.
Theorem 2.
If m and n are non-negative integers and v is a real number, then
In particular,
Proof. Since
and
multiplication of the left hand side of (3.1) by
and the right hand side by
gives
so that
from which (4.1) now follows by termwise integration from 0 to
, according to the parity of
n, using Lemma 1.
□
Corollary 3.
If n is a non-negative integer and v is a real number, then
Corollary 4.
If n is a non-negative integer and v is a real number, then
and
Proof. Identity (4.3) is obtained by setting in (4.1) and re-labeling m as n while (4.4) is the evaluation of (4.1) at with a re-labeling of m as n. □
Proposition 5.
If n is a non-negative integer, then
Proof. Evaluation of (4.4) at
gives (4.5) while evaluation at
yields (4.6). In deriving (4.5), we used the following relationships between binomial coefficients:
and
all of which can be derived by using the Gamma function identities:
and
together with the definition of the generalized binomial coefficients as given in (2.1). □
Proposition 6.
If m and n are non-negative integers, then
In particular,
Proof. Evaluate (4.1) at .
□
5. Polynomial Identities
In this section, by employing Lemma 1 we derive new polynomial identities from the binomial theorem.
Theorem 7.
If n is a non-negative integer, v is a real number and x is a complex variable, then
Proof. Consider the following variation on the binomial theorem:
Write
for
y, multiply through by
and integrate from 0 to
with respect to
y, using Lemma 1. □
Corollary 8.
If n is a non-negative integer and x is a complex variable, then
Proof. Identity (1.5) on page 2 and identities (5.2) and (5.3) correspond to the evaluation of (5.1) at , and , respectively.
In deriving (5.2), we used (4.7)–(4.10) to obtain
and
□
Theorem 9.
if n is a non-negative integer, v is a real number and x is a complex variable, then
Proof. Write
for
y in the following variation on the binomial theorem:
multiply through by
and integrate from 0 to
with respect to
y, using Lemma 1. □
Corollary 10.
If n is a non-negative integer and x is a complex variable, then
Proof. Identities (5.5), (5.6) and (5.7) correspond to the evaluation of (5.4) at , and , respectively.
□
6. More Combinatorial Identities
Theorem 11.
If n is an integer and v is a real number, then
and
Proof. Evaluate (5.1) at and , respectively. □
Remark 2. Setting in (5.1) reproduces identity (4.2) while setting reproduces (4.3).
Proposition 12.
If n is a non-negative integer, then
Proof. Set in each of identities (1.5)–(5.3). □
Proposition 13.
If n is a non-negative integer, then
Proof. Set in each of identities (1.5)–(5.3). □
Proposition 14.
If n is a non-negative integer, then
Proof. Set in each of identities (1.5)–(5.3).
□
Theorem 15.
if n is a non-negative integer and v is a real number, then
Proof. Set in (5.4). □
Proposition 16.
If n is a non-negative integer, then
Proof. Set in each of identities (5.5)–(5.7) or what is the same thing, , and in (6.11).
□
References
- K. Adegoke, Editorial Correction to “A note on a generalization of Riordan’s combinatorial identity via a hypergeometric series approach”, Notes on Number Theory and Discrete Mathematics 2024, 30, 211–212.
- H. Alzer, Combinatorial identities and hypergeometric functions, II, Discrete Mathematics Letters 2024, 13, 1–5. [CrossRef]
- I. Gradshteyn and I. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, 7th edition, Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2007.
- D. Lim, A note on a generalization of Riordan’s combinatorial identity via a hypergeometric series approach, Notes on Number Theory and Discrete Mathematics 2023, 3, 421–425.
- H. Prodinger, Knuth’s old sum - a survey, EACTS Bulletin 1994, 52, 232–245.
- A. K. Rathie, I., Kim and R. B. Paris. Anoteonageneralizationoftwowell-knowncombinatorialidentities
via ahypergeometricseriesapproach, Integers. 2022, 22, A28. [Google Scholar]
- J. Riordan, Combinatorial Identities, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, (1971).
- A. Tefera and A. Zeleke, On proofs of generalized Knuth’s old sum, Integers 2023, 23, A99.
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).