Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Paederia grandidieri Leaf Extracts: Polyphenols and Biological Activities

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

31 October 2024

Posted:

01 November 2024

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
In many developing countries human health problems are solved using local plants. Knowledge of their chemical composition and biological activities can contribute to the creation of natural-based products usefully employed in human health. In this work, we analyzed Paederia grandidieri leaves extracted with diverse eco-compatible procedures and subjected to chemical, microbiological, and cellular compatibility assays. Fresh leaves of P. grandidieri were harvested in southern Madagascar, dried and powdered. Distilled water and ethanol at different temperatures and times were used for extraction. Polyphenol composition, antioxidant, antibacterial, prebiotic and cytotoxic properties of the extracts were analyzed. The aqueous extracts contained higher levels of flavan-3-ols and flavanones, while the hydro-alcoholic extracts were richer in flavonols and flavones. The aqueous extracts showed the highest total phenolic and total flavonoid contents, and antioxidant activity, but lower cytotoxicity with respect to the hydro-alcoholic extracts. None of the extracts had significant antibacterial effects against selected oral pathogens, but prebiotic effects against Streptococcus salivarius were detected. This study indicates that P. grandidieri possesses significant biological properties which make it a suitable candidate for the production of pro-health products for the oral cavity.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Since ancient times, knowledge of plants with therapeutic properties has helped humankind treat and resolve various diseases [1]. Throughout history, medicinal plants have secured an important place in healing practices and treatment of diseases due to their significant health and socioeconomic benefits, especially in countries with high poverty rates and limited health coverage [2]. In developing countries, traditional plant-based medicine remains a cornerstone of healthcare, as many health problems are solved thanks to natural therapeutic solutions obtained using local plants [3]. With the advent of the post-antibiotic era [4], the spread of antibiotic resistance, and the emergence of new pathogens, herbal medicines have been widely reevaluated and have acquired a fundamental role in global health programs, including in highly industrialized countries [5].
The economic and health relevance of plant-based medicines has increased worldwide, so much so that almost 50% of medicines are made using natural plant materials [6]. The demand for herbal medicines, natural health products, and plant secondary metabolites is growing rapidly worldwide, indicating that medicinal plants are globally valuable sources of new medicines [7]. The global market of herbal medicines is worth 215.4 billion USD in 2024 and is forecasted to be worth 305 billion USD by 2029 (https://www.marketdataforecast.com/market-reports/herbal-medicine-market 9-7-2024).
The southwestern region of Madagascar, called the Mahafaly region, is an arid, economically and climatically disadvantaged area. Nonetheless, it is an extremely relevant region, characterized by high biotic endemism, and reported as one of the world's 200 most important ecological areas [8]. Here medicinal plants are a primary source of healthcare for most of the local population. Despite poverty that prevents access to basic oral hygiene products such as toothpaste and toothbrushes, this population generally shows signs of healthy and strong teeth with fewer cases of tooth decay than in other regions of Madagascar. A survey revealed that most of the population relies on plants for daily dental care, including Paederia grandidieri, also called Tamboro [9].
The Paederia genus, belonging to the Rubiaceae family, includes several species known for their different medicinal properties. The traditional use of plants of the Paederia genus has been documented in several publications, but the results have not always been consistent. [10] reported anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antioxidant, healing and tooth-strengthening properties of P. tuarsiana extracts. P. foetida is widely used in traditional medicine for the treatment of various disorders such as diarrhea, dysentery, and intestinal infections [11]. The whole extract of P. foetida plant showed no or limited antibacterial and antifungal activities [12], while the leaf extract proved to possess antibacterial activity against Staphyloccocous aureus and Eschirichia coli [13]. The therapeutic potential of Paederia spp. is attributed to its rich phytochemical profile, which includes alkaloids, saponins, and tannins [14]. However, investigations on the chemical, microbiological and biological properties of P. grandidieri are virtually absent.
For this reason, in this work, we analyzed P. grandidieri leaf extracted with diverse eco-compatible procedures and subjected them to chemical, microbiological, and cellular compatibility assays.

2. Results

2.1. Total Phenolic Content, Total Flavonoid Content and Antioxidant Activity of P. grandidieri Leaf Extracts

The P. grandidieri leaf extracts tested were acqueous (PG1, PG2 and PG3) and hydro-alcoholic (PG4 and PG5) (the extractions conditions are reported in Materials & Methods, Table 4. Briefly, PG1: aqueous extract at 25°C for 24 hours; PG3: aqueous extract at 60°C for 24 hours; PG5: hydro-alcoholic extract at 25°C for 24 hours). The highest total phenolic content (TPC) concentration of P. grandidieri leaf extract, based on the Folin-Ciocalteau assay extracts, was shown by the PG1 extract, followed by PG3 and PG2, although the differences were not significant. PG4 and PG5 showed the lowest significant values. The highest total flavonoid content (TFC) based on the aluminium trichloride (AlCl3) assay was shown by PG2 extract, followed by PG3, PG1 and PG5, although the differences were not significant. The lowest significant value was shown by PG4. The highest antioxidant activity, based on the DPPH assay, was shown by PG1 and PG3. The lowest significant percentage was reported in PG2, PG4 and PG5 extracts (Table 1).

2.2. HPLC Profile of P. grandidieri Leaf Extracts

Representative chromatograms of P. grandidieri leaf extracts are reported in Figure 1. Tentative identification of the main peaks in the chromatographic profiles was done using standards (caffeic acid and rutin), comparison of the retention time with the available literature [15] and UV spectra.
UV spectra, reported in Figure 2, indicate that caffeic acid and analogues (glycosilated compounds) and rutin and differently glycosylated forms of rutin may be present.
The TPC and flavonoids of P. grandidieri leaf extracts were calculated expressing the peak areas as equivalent concentrations of gallic acid, rutin and naringin per g of leaves (Table 2). The highest TPC yield, based on GAE, was recorded in PG1, PG3, PG4, and PG5. PG2 obtained the lowest yield. The highest amount of flavan-3-ols and flavanones evaluated by the naringin standard curve was recorded in PG1, while the highest flavonols and flavons yield, evaluated by the rutin standard curve, was recorded in PG5, followed by PG4 and PG1. PG3 and PG2 showed lower significant values.
Table 2. Total phenolic content (TPC) and flavonoids (mg/g dry vegetal product) of Paederia grandidieri leaf extracts. PG1: aqueous extract at 25°C for 24 hours; PG3: aqueous extract at 60°C for 24 hours; PG5: hy-dro-alcoholic extract at 25°C for 24 hours.
Table 2. Total phenolic content (TPC) and flavonoids (mg/g dry vegetal product) of Paederia grandidieri leaf extracts. PG1: aqueous extract at 25°C for 24 hours; PG3: aqueous extract at 60°C for 24 hours; PG5: hy-dro-alcoholic extract at 25°C for 24 hours.
PG1 PG 2 PG 3 PG4 PG5
TPC Total phenolic content (CGAE) (evaluated at 280 nm) 15.81±1.28a 5.33 ±0.37b 14.05 ±1.14a 15.51 ±0.96a 17.14 ±1.57a
Flavonoids Flavan-3-ols and Flavanones (CNE) (evaluated at FDL 280-330 nm) 3.55 ±0.15a 2.34 ±0.15c 2.51 ±0.39c 1.29 ±0.30d 3.09 ±0.16b
Flavonols and flavones (CRE) (evaluated at 360 nm) 6.61 ±0.40c 2.11 ±0.2e 5.31 ±0.58d 7.48±0.28b 8.77 ±0.58a
The values are indicated as mean ± SD. Letters indicate statistical significance. (FDL= fluorescence detection).

2.3. In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of P. grandidieri Leaf Extracts

All aqueous and hydro-alcoholic extracts, at 5 and 10 mg/disk concentrations, did not show antibacterial activity against Rothia dentocariosa, Streptococcus mutans ATCC 25175, E. coli ATCC 25922 and S. aureus ATCC 25923 (Table S1 and Figure S2).

2.4. In Vitro Prebiotic Effect of P. grandidieri Aqueous Extract on Streptococcus salivarius

The fitness of the selected bacterial isolates was monitored in the presence of different concentrations (0, 100, 150, 200 µg mL-1) of PG1 extract (Fig. 3). PG1 extract was selected due to the highest TPC and flavonoid content based on the HPLC peak area evaluation and as the extract with the intermediate value of cytotoxicity. Although the extract did not have any impact on the survival of the cariogenic S. mutans ATCC 25175 strain, the survival of the probiotic S. salivarius K2 isolate increased in a dose-dependent manner. After 24 and 48 hours of incubation in the presence of 100, 150 and 200 µg mL-1 of P. grandidieri aqueous extract, there was a significant increase in the number of viable cells of S. salivarius K2, thus supporting a prebiotic effect of PG1 extract on oral strain at tested concentrations.
Figure 3. Effect of PG1 aqueous extract (25°C for 24 hours) on the survival of Streptococcus salivarius K12 (a) and S. mutans ATCC 25175 (b) in pure culture in the absence and in the presence of 100 µg µL-1, 150 µg µL-1, and 200 µg µL-1 of PG1. The experiments were performed in triplicate with independent cultures, and data were analyzed with GraphPad Prism version 8.0.2 software. Statistical significance was examined by the Two-way ANOVA test with Dunnett’s correction. Results are indicated as means ± SDs. Asterisks indicate statistical significance (**** p < 0.0001; *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Effect of PG1 aqueous extract (25°C for 24 hours) on the survival of Streptococcus salivarius K12 (a) and S. mutans ATCC 25175 (b) in pure culture in the absence and in the presence of 100 µg µL-1, 150 µg µL-1, and 200 µg µL-1 of PG1. The experiments were performed in triplicate with independent cultures, and data were analyzed with GraphPad Prism version 8.0.2 software. Statistical significance was examined by the Two-way ANOVA test with Dunnett’s correction. Results are indicated as means ± SDs. Asterisks indicate statistical significance (**** p < 0.0001; *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05).
Preprints 138189 g003

2.5. In Vitro Cytotoxic Effects of P. grandidieri Leaf Extracts

The cytotoxic effects of P. grandidieri leaf extracts were evaluated using the MTT assay on mouse fibroblasts (L929 cell line). Cells were treated with concentrations ranging from 50 µg/ml to 100 mg/ml for each extract for 24 and 48 hours. The results were expressed as the percentage of cell viability relative to the control. Figure 4 illustrates the relationships between the extract concentrations and cell viability. At low concentrations (50-100 µg/mL for 24 hours and 50-250 µg/mL for 48 hours), none of the extracts showed cytotoxic effects, with cell viability remaining above 80% (dashed line). Cell viability was significantly reduced at higher concentrations (from 150 µg/mL to 100 mg/mL for 24 hours and from 500 µg/mL to 100 mg/mL for 48 hours), demonstrating a dose-dependent cytotoxic effect for all extracts.
Table 3 shows the IC20 values, the concentrations required to inhibit cell growth by 20%, corresponding to 80% cell survival. A cell survival of 80% is considered the accepted threshold for cell viability [16]. Notably, the PG5 extract demonstrated the highest cytotoxicity, with the lowest IC20 values, followed by PG4> PG1>PG2>PG3.

3. Discussion

In this study, aqueous and hydro-alcoholic P. grandidieri leaf extracts were analyzed to evaluate their antioxidant, antibacterial, prebiotic and cytotoxic properties. Furthermore, the polyphenolic profile of the extracts was partially characterized by HPLC. Polyphenol identification was estimated through retention times, UV spectrum profiles and comparison against HPLC standards. Although the Paederia genus is known for its different medicinal properties, this is the first report on P. grandidieri, an endemic species of South Madagascar used by the populations for its supposed antibacterial and oral hygiene-improving properties.
The antioxidant activity of P. grandidieri extracts showed values ranging from 58% to 83% confrontable with the results reported on P. foetida [17]. However, total polyphenol and total flavonoid values reported in this study are lower than those reported by [17] in the alcoholic extract of P. fetida leaves, a plant belonging to the same family as P. grandidieri. Such discrepancy is likely due to the prolonged extraction times (48 hours) used in P. fetida. Further, the antioxidant activity is influenced by several variables, such as extraction conditions (solvent, time, temperature, pH) [18] as well as the structure-activity relationship, also known as SAR, which reflects the general structure, position and type of side groups [19]. Thus, a different polyphenol composition may affect the total antioxidant capacity of an extract. Therefore, in an attempt to get a more precise evaluation of the polyphenol content of P. grandidieri leaf extracts, we used an RP-HPLC-DAD-FLD to identify and quantify subclasses of polyphenols in P. grandidieri leaf extracts (chromatographic fingerprint).
Chromatograms recorded at different UV and FLD yielded different profiles depending on the sample's composition, allowing the HPLC profile to be used to discriminate samples from each other. The application of HPLC coupled to UV detection at wavelengths of 280, 320 and 360 to respectively identify the chemical classes of benzoic acids and flavan-3-ols (280nm), hydroxycinnamic acids (320) and flavonols (360) is well established [20]. In particular, the chromatograms recorded at 280 nm contain information related to the overall content of phenolic acids and certain families of flavonoids (saturated and unsaturated C ring structures) so that the sum of the areas could be a reasonable index of the total phenolic content [21]. The chromatograms recorded at 360 nm give information on flavonoids with unsaturated B and C rings (flavones such as apigenin and luteolin, flavonols such as quercetin and rutin) [22]. Finally, recent studies have estimated the content of flavan-3-ols and flavanones using FLD at 280 and 330 as excitation and emission wavelengths, respectively. These wavelengths are more specific for flavonoids without an unsaturated C-ring such as flavan-3 ols like catechin and flavanones like hesperetin and naringenin, while the contributions of other phenolic compounds, such as hydroxybenzoic and hydroxycinnamic acids, were found to be negligible [21]. These results have opened new opportunities for rapid chemical and bioactive screening of polyphenol-rich extracts [23].
To compare the HPLC profile among extracts, the overlapping with intensity autoscaling was conducted. The maximum content of total polyphenols was recorded in the ethanolic extracts, and the yield of extraction was found to increase in a time-dependent manner. The qualitative analysis revealed a distinct pattern of phenolic subgroups between the aqueous and the alcoholic extracts, showing a significant influence of solvent polarity. In particular, at 25°C, the hydro-alcoholic extracts were richer in flavonols and flavones compared to the aqueous extract. Conversely, the aqueous extract contained higher levels of flavan-3-ols and flavanones than the hydro-alcoholic extracts. These results are consistent with the literature, which reports that flavonols and flavones are less polar flavonoids and are preferentially extracted with a suitable alcohol or alcohol-water mixture, while flavan-3-ols and flavanones are extracted with water [24]. Notably, the aqueous extract at 25°C for 24 hours specifically contained caffeic acid, highlighting its solubility in water, while the hydroalcoholic extracts revealed an analogue of rutin, indicating that the combination of alcohol and water effectively extracts flavonols with enhanced solubility. Rutin and an analogue of caffeic acid were identified in all samples. The composition of polyphenolic compounds reported in our study is consistent with that documented in the literature for other species of Paederia where caffeic acid and rutin were identified in the leaves, stems, and other aerial parts of P. foetida [25, 26].
There are no data in the literature regarding the antibacterial activity of P. grandidieri, but [12] reported the antibacterial effect of P. foetida leaf extracts. No antibacterial effect was observed in the methanolic extract while moderate antibacterial activity was reported in ethyl acetate, chloroform, and n-hexane extracts against Bacillus cereus, S. aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Vibrio mimicus. In addition, some studies have shown the antibacterial effectiveness of Paederia spp. extracts against bacteria causing diarrhea and intestinal inflammation, such as E. coli and S. aureus [13, 27, 28]. For example, [27] used sonication with methanol as a solvent in a 1:10 ratio, observing clear inhibition zones with diameters of 26 ± 1.4 mm and 37.6 ± 0.41 mm for E. coli and Mycobacterium smegmatis, respectively. Conversely, [28] used the same 1:10 ratio but sonicated the leaf powder in 96% ethanol followed by stirring for 24 hours. In [13] P. foetida was extracted using ethyl acetate and ethyl alcohol, resulting in inhibition zones with diameters of 13.95 mm for S. aureus and 14.20 mm for E. coli. Regarding the prebiotic effects, there are no studies in the literature about P. grandidieri extracts on oral probiotics, but a recent study demonstrated how P. scandens ethanolic extracts contributed to modulating gut microbiota [29]. Given that numerous studies have shown the prebiotic effects of polyphenols extracted from plant sources on both intestinal and oral probiotics [30, 31, 32], the obtained results appear highly promising. Future research aimed at confirming the ability of P. grandidieri extracts to beneficially modulate the oral microbiota could lead to the development of prebiotic formulations for oral health. Therefore, the literature reveals significant variability in the antibacterial effects of botanical extracts, influenced by various factors, including the botanical species and the season of harvest, which can affect the biosynthesis of bioactive compounds, as well as the extraction techniques, the type of solvent, and the concentration of polyphenols and other compounds [33, 34, 35]. Although the tested P. grandidieri extracts did not show significant direct antibacterial effects against selected oral pathogens at the concentrations used, the results related to prebiotic effects suggest a potential indirect antibacterial effect through microbiota modulation. Indeed, the modulation of the growth of even a single probiotic strain can influence the balance of the oral microbiota in vivo, reducing the presence of pathogenic bacteria [36].
P. grandidieri leaf extracts varied significantly from each other in terms of cytotoxicity. These variations could be attributed to differences in extraction conditions, such as solvent, time and temperature, which play a crucial role in determining the chemical composition of plant extracts, thus influencing their biological activities, including cytotoxic effects [37]. In particular, the high cytotoxicity of a polyphenolic extract indicates that the extract has high biological potency and is rich in bioactive compounds [38]. In our study, the most cytotoxic extracts were the aqueous extract at 25°C and the hydro-alcoholic extracts. Their high cytotoxicity can be attributed to their polyphenolic content. In the aqueous extract at 25°C we identified caffeic acid, a well-known phenolic compound with potent biological activity that may partly explain the observed cytotoxic effects. It scavenges free radicals, reduces oxidative stress, protects cells from damage, and reduces the production of inflammatory mediators at low or moderate doses, although at high doses it becomes cytotoxic, inducing oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and apoptosis in various cell types, including cancer cells [39]. The hydro-alcoholic extracts displayed a richer flavonol composition, including a rutin analogue. Like caffeic acid, rutin and rutin analogues can exhibit antioxidant properties at lower concentrations, protecting cells from oxidative damage but at higher doses, they can induce oxidative stress and apoptosis, particularly in cancer cells [40]. Such property is beneficial for their potential use as anti-cancer agents, but it also means that at high doses can harm normal, healthy cells. Investigating the dose-dependent nature is crucial for understanding it’s therapeutic potential and risks. While a time-dependent increase in cytotoxicity was observed in the hydro-alcoholic extracts at 25°C, this same effect was not observed in the aqueous extracts at 60°C. Higher temperatures could enhance the solubility of bioactive compounds leading to a higher yield of certain phenolic compounds. However, prolonged exposure to heat can lead to the degradation of heat-sensitive compounds. The aqueous extract at 60°C for 24 hours showed the lowest cytotoxicity, probably due to degradative effects, which may have reduced the activity of key bioactive compounds detected. Changes in bioactivity might be due to very slight structural alterations not detected as separate peaks by standard chromatographic methods [41]. Although no prior studies have focused on the cytotoxic effects of P. grandidieri leaves, research on related species within the same genus provides valuable insights. Our results align with [42], who reported cytotoxic effects of the ethanolic extract of P. foetida at a concentration higher than 200 µg/ml. Other studies have explored the cytotoxic properties of methanolic extracts of P. foetida. with similar results [43, 44].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Reagents and Solutions

Methanol and acetonitrile (HPLC-grade), ethanol, formic acid, Folin–Ciocalteu reagent, aluminium trichloride (AlCl3), DPPH (2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl), standards used for HPLC analysis (quercetin, gallic acid, rutin, naringin and caffeic acid) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Milan, Italy). Ultrapure water (18 MW cm) was obtained using a Milli-Q water purification system (Millipore, Milford, MA, USA) to prepare the mobile phase and other aqueous solutions. All samples and standard solutions were filtered through 0.22 and 0.45-µm polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane filters.

4.2. Sample collection and extraction

Fresh leaves of P. grandidieri were harvested in six districts (Toliara I and II, Ampanihy, Beloha, Tsihombe, Ambovombe) in southern Madagascar in September and October 2023. The Botanical Survey of the University of Mahajanga Madagascar authenticated the plants. The leaves were dried for 45 days in a cool place away from the sun according to the instructions of the University of Toliara’s botanists (Madagascar) to preserve the plant’s integrity. Thereafter, the leaves were cut into small pieces, ground into powder using a food blender and saved in plastic bags under vacuum. Extractions were carried out with distilled water and ethanol at different temperatures and times with continuous stirring, as reported in Table 4. The extraction mixture was filtered to separate the solid residue from the liquid phase. The filtrates were distilled under reduced pressure using a rotary evaporator and freeze-dried.
Table 4. Extraction conditions of Paederia grandidieri leaves.
Table 4. Extraction conditions of Paederia grandidieri leaves.
Extract Solvent Ratio (w/v) Temperature (°C) Time (h)
PG1 H2O 1:50 25°C 24
PG2 H2O 1:50 60°C 6
PG3 H2O 1:50 60°C 24
PG4 EtOH 70% 1:10 25°C 4
PG5 EtOH 70% 1:10 25°C 24

4.3. Total Phenolic Content

The total phenolic content (TPC) was determined by the Folin–Ciocalteu method according to [45]. Briefly, 2 ml of deionized H2O, 50 μL of Folin–Ciocalteu reagent, 50 μL of filtered sample, and 100 μL of 20% Na2CO3 were used. The solution was mixed and incubated in the dark for 90 min. The absorbance was measured at 760 nm with a SP-UV1100 spectrophotometer (DLAB Scientific Co., Ltd. Cina). The absorbance values were interpolated with a gallic acid standard curve, and the results were expressed as mg of Gallic Acid Equivalent (GAE)/g of dry matter. For each sample, the assay was carried out in duplicate.

4.4. Total Flavonoid Content

The total flavonoid content (TFC) was determined using the Dowd method [46]. 1 mL of 2% aluminium trichloride (AlCl3) water solution was mixed with the same volume of unknown sample diluted 1:100. After 15 min of incubation in the dark, the samples were read at 430 nm with SP-UV1100 spectrophotometer. The standard curve was constructed with quercetin, and the concentration was expressed in mg of Quercetin Equivalents (QE)/g of dry matter.

4.5. DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity

The percentage of oxidative inhibition of P. grandidieri extracts was evaluated using the DPPH assay as reported in [47]. 50 μL of extract were mixed with 2.45 mL of DPPH methanol solution (0.004%) and incubated at RT in the dark for 30 min. The absorbance was measured at 517 nm using SP-UV1100 spectrophotometer. Methanol was used as a blank. DPPH radical scavenging activity (RSA%) was calculated according to the following equation: RSA%=(ADPPH-A sample)/ADPPH*100, where ADPPH is the absorbance at 517 nm of the DPPH solution and A sample is the absorbance of the sample under test.

4.6. HPLC/DAD/FL Analysis

Stock solutions of standard phenolic compounds were prepared in MeOH at a 4 g/L concentration and stored at -20°C in the dark. The multi-component standard solution was prepared to a final 1 g/L concentration by diluting the initial methanolic solutions. Working solutions in MeOH acidified 2N HCl were prepared daily by diluting the multicomponent stock solution at different concentrations ranging from 2.5 to 50 µg/ml. The P. grandidieri extracts were dissolved in an HCl 2N acidified methanolic solution. Dissolved samples were filtered (0,2 µm PVDF filters) and analyzed by a JASCO Series 4000 compact HPLC equipped with an oven column (model CO-2060 plus), UV/Vis Photodiode Array Detector (model MD-2018 plus), Intelligent Fluorescence Detector (model PF-2020 plus), liquid chromatography pump (model PU-2089 plus), autosampler (AS-2059 plus), and ChromNAV software program (JASCO). Analysis of samples was conducted in triplicate according to the conditions reported by [15] Giusti et al., (2017). The separation was carried out with a C18 Luna (250 mm length x 3.0 ID 5-μm particle size) column (Phenomenex,Torrance, CA, USA) at 40°C using water with 0,1 % (v/v) formic acid (mobile Phase A) and acetonitrile (mobile phase B). The gradient was as follows: 0 min 90% (A), 0-17 min 40% (A), 17-22 min 40% (A), 22-28 min 90% (A) and kept at 90% (A) until the end of the run. The flow rate was 0.9 ml /min, and the injection volume was 20 µL for a total run time of 30 min.

4.7. Identification of Polyphenols

UV detection was carried out at wavelengths of 280 and 360 nm, and fluorescence detection (FLD) at wavelengths of 330 nm as emission after excitation at 280 nm. Specifically, the HPLC profile at 280 nm correlated with the TPC expressed as mg GAE/g [48]. The HPLC profile recorded at 360 nm correlated with flavonols (quercetin and analogues) and flavons expressed as mg Rutin Equivalent/g of the sample [49]. The HPLC profile recorded at 330emission/280exitation correlated with flavan-3-ols (catechins and analogues) and flavanones (naringin and analogues) [21]. Phenolic groups were quantified by comparison with standard curves of gallic acid (GA), rutin, and naringin (Figure S2). Quantifying TPC as Gallic Acid Equivalent Concentration (CGAE/ml) was performed by plotting the sum of the peak areas of the unknown sample against the slope and intercept of the GA calibration curve. A similar procedure was applied for the peak areas recorded at 360 nm and 330emission/280exitation, expressing the peak areas as equivalent concentrations of Rutin (CRE/ml) and Naringin (CNE/ml), respectively.
The general formula to determine the CGAE was:
CGAE = (∑Apeak areas at UV 280 nm-b)/m
where m is the slope of the calibration curve of GA; b is the intercept of the same calibration curve.
The general formula to determine the CRE was:
CRE = (∑Apeak areas at UV 360 nm-b)/m
where m is the slope of the calibration curve of rutin; b is the intercept of the same calibration curve.
The general formula to determine the CNE was:
CNE = (∑Apeak areas at FLD280- 330 nm-b)/m
where m is the slope of the calibration curve of naringin carried out in the same experimental conditions (FDL 280-330 nm); b is the intercept of the same calibration curve. The amount of each “Phenolic group” was expressed as mg “Phenolic Equivalent” per gr. of dry leaf samples.

4.8. Antibacterial Assay

The in vitro antibacterial activity of selected extracts was tested against two cariogenic bacteria, Rothia dentocariosa and Streptococcus mutans ATCC 25175, and two food pathogen strains, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923; details on bacterial isolation and growth conditions are reported in [50, 51], respectively for cariogenic bacteria and food isolates. To qualitatively assess the antibacterial activity of P. grandidieri leaf extracts against selected microorganisms, an in vitro antibacterial screening was performed using the agar disk diffusion method as described by [52]. Briefly, aliquots of 200 µL of each bacterial suspension, adjusted to an optical density (O.D.) of 0.5 at 600 nm, were spread on agar media. Sterile discs with a diameter of 6 mm (HiMedia Laboratories GmbH, Modautal, Germany) were then impregnated with the extracts and placed on the media. For each type of extract, two concentrations were tested: 5 and 10 mg. After incubation at 37 ± 2 °C for 24–48 hours for all strains, the diameter of the inhibition zones formed around the discs was measured in millimeters, according to [53]. Antibacterial activities were expressed as the mean diameter of the inhibition zones (MDIZ) produced by the extracts against the tested microorganisms. Conventional antibiotics, including amoxicillin (Aesculapius Farmaceutici S.r.l., Brescia, Italy), gentamicin (Sigma-Aldrich S.r.l., Milano, Italy) and vancomycin (Gold Biotechnology, Saint Louis, MI, USA), were used as positive controls, while extraction buffers served as negative controls. The experiments were conducted in triplicate with independent cultures.

4.9. Fitness Assay

An in vitro fitness assay was performed to quantify the effect of the P. grandidieri aqueous extract PG1 on the growth and survival of the probiotic strain S. salivarius K12 (ATCC BAA-1 024), isolated from the pharmaceutical product Bactoblis® (PharmExtracta S.p.A, Pontenure, Italy). The strain was cultured under aerobic conditions at 37 °C in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium. The fitness of the cariogenic strain Streptococcus mutans ATCC 25175 (LGC Standards,United Kingdom) in the presence of increasing concentrations of the selected extract was monitored to exclude any prebiotic effect on oral pathogens. In particular, the susceptibility of selected bacteria to different concentrations of PG1 was determined according to [54] using the dilution tube method with standard inoculums of 1 × 105 CFU mL−1. PG1 was added to tubes at the final concentrations of 0, 100, 150, and 200 μg mL−1. The bacterial cultures were incubated at 37 °C in a shaking incubator (ES-20, Biosan, Riga, Latvia) at 150 rpm. To evaluate the growth and survival of probiotic strains, during the overall observation period of 120 h, aliquots of the diluted bacterial suspensions were spread on LB agar. Finally, the plates were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C to carry out the count of the viable bacterial colonies.

4.10. Cell Culture and Treatment

The L929 cell line (murine fibroblasts) was purchased from ATCC (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA) and cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) and a 1% penicillin/streptomycin solution (10,000 U/mL/10 mg/mL; Gibco,Waltham, MA, USA). Cell cultures were maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 and monitored daily using an inverted microscope (Nikon, EclipseTS100). Subcultures were performed twice a week when 80% confluence was observed. To perform treatments, cells were seeded at a density of 5.0 × 103 cells per well in 96-well plates and kept in the incubator for 24 h before stimulation. The next day, cells were treated for 24 and 48 hours with increasing doses of each extract (PG1, PG2, PG3, PG4 and PG5), from 0 to 100 mg/ml. All samples were analyzed in triplicate, and experiments were repeated three times with independent cell cultures.

4.11. In Vitro Cell Viability Studies

After stimulation, cell viability was evaluated by MTT assay. Briefly, 20 μl of MTT solution (5 mg/mL) were added to each well. After 4h of incubation in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37°C, the medium was removed, and the resulting formazan crystals were dissolved in 100 μl of isopropanol. Finally, the absorbance value was calculated at a wavelength of 570 nm with a spectrophotometer (Infinite F200 PRO TECAN, Grödig, Austria). The percentage of cell viability was measured according to the following equation:
% cell viability = 100 X (Abssample / Abscontrol),
Abs sample was the absorbance of treated cells, and Abscontrol was the absorbance of untreated cells. GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad software, Inc., version 8.1.1, San Diego, CA, USA) was used to calculate the inhibitory concentration 20 (IC20) value of P. grandidieri extracts. Data were transformed to a log scale and normalized, setting the 0 µg/ml dose as 100% cell viability.

4.12. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were performed in triplicate, and the results were reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Data obtained were analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Dunnett’s correction (p < 0.05) for comparison with control. The Tukey’s test was used for post hoc analysis. Significant differences were defined as * p < 0.01, ** p < 0.001 and *** p < 0.0001. Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad software, Inc., version 8.1.1, San Diego, CA, USA).

5. Conclusions

In the present study, aqueous and hydro-alcoholic extracts of P. grandidieri leaves were evaluated for their phenolic contents and biological activities. Phytochemical analysis revealed that solvent, temperature and extraction time resulted in different chemical compositions and biological activities. In general, aqueous extracts showed higher antioxidant activity and lower cytotoxicity. Neither aqueous nor hydro-alcoholic extracts showed antibacterial activity but interestingly, prebiotic properties were manifested against S. salivarius. Altogether, these data suggest that P. grandidieri could be used as a natural compound for mouth health-promoting products.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at the website of this paper posted on Preprints.org, Figure S1 Standard curves of gallic acid, rutin and naringin; Figure 2: In vitro antibacterial activity of P. grandidieri leaf extracts Table S1: In vitro antibacterial activity of P. grandidieri leaf extracts.

Author Contributions

For research articles with several authors, a short paragraph specifying their individual contributions must be provided. The following statements should be used “Conceptualization, C.P., M.P. and R.F.; methodology, N.F., R.F., and C.P.; validation, N.F., E.C., and C.P.; formal analysis, C.P. and M.P.; investigation, F.J.R., N.F., E.C., D.J.R, and L.A.; resources, J.A.R.; data curation, N.F., E.C., and D.S.; writing—original draft preparation, C.P., M.P., N.F. and E.C.; writing—review and editing, C.P. and M.P.; supervision, M.P.; project administration, C.P. and M.P.; funding acquisition, C.P. and M.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.”

Funding

This research was funded by Fondi di Ateneo FRA (Università del Sannio) 2023 to Prof. Caterina Pagliarulo and Marina Paolucci.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Prof. Harimbola David Rakotonandrasana, and Dr. Edwin Herindrainy Constant Claudel for their invaluable contribution to identifying and collecting samples of Paederia Grandidieri.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that this research was carried out in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be considered potential conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Altaf, M.M.; Khan, M.S.A.; Ahmad, I. Diversity of Bioactive Compounds and Their Therapeutic Potential. In New Look to Phytomedicine; Mohd Sajjad, Ahmad Khan, Iqbal Ahmad, Debprasad Chattopadhyay, Eds.; Academic Press, 2019; Pp 15-34, ISBN 9780128146194. [CrossRef]
  2. Nath, R.; Kityania, S.; Nath, D.; Talkudar, A.D.; Sarma, G. An extensive review on medicinal plants in the special context of economic importance. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2023, 16, 6–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Oyebode, O.; Kandala, N.B.; Chilton, P.J.; Lilford, R.J. Use of traditional medicine in middle-income countries: a WHO-SAGE study. Health Policy Plan 2016, 31, 984–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  4. World Health Organization (WHO) (2014). Antibacterial resistance: global report on surveillance. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241564748 (accessed on 08 July 2024).
  5. Abdallah, E.M.; Alhatlani, B.Y.; de Paula Menezes, R.; Martins, C.H.G. Back to Nature: Medicinal Plants as Promising Sources for Antibacterial Drugs in the Post-Antibiotic Era. Plants 2023, 12, 3077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Veeresham, C. Natural products derived from plants as a source of drugs. J. Adv. Pharm. Technol. Res. 2012, 4, 200––201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  7. Parvin, S.; Reza, A.; Das, S.; Miah, M.M.U.; Karim, S. Potential Role and International Trade of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants in the World. EJFOOD 2023, 5, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Olson, D.M.; Dinerstein, E. The global 200: Priority Ecoregions for Global. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 2002, 89, 199–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Andriamparany, J.N.; Brinkmann, K.; Jeannoda, V. Effects of socio-economic household characteristics on traditional knowledge and usage of wild yams and medicinal plants in the Mahafaly region of south-western Madagascar. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2014, 10–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ramanampamaharana, R.H.; Randriamavo-Solo, H.N.A.; Rasoamananjara, J.A.; Rafatro, H. Combination of phytotherapy by using herbal medicine from Paederia thouarsiana leaf crude extract and conventional therapy for the care of painful oral conditions in a clinical dentistry practice. Int. Res. J. Med. Biomed. Sci. 2022, 7, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Uddin, B., Nahar, T.; Khalil, M.I.; Hossain, S. In vitro antibacterial activity of the ethanol extract of Paederia foetida L. (Rubiaceae) leaves Bangladesh. J. Life Sci. 2022, 19, 141–143.
  12. Morshed, H.; Islam, M.S.; Parvin, S.; Ahmed, M.U.; Islam, M.S.; Mostofa, A.G.M.; Sayeed, M.S.B. Antibacterial and cytotoxic activity of the methanol extract of Paederia foetida Linn. (Rubiaceae). J. Appl. Pharm. Sci, 2012; 77–80. [Google Scholar]
  13. Vicencio, M.C.G. Antibacterial efficacy of leaf extracts of Paederia foetida Linnaeus. J. Chem. Res. Adv. 2021, 2, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  14. Soni, R.K.; Irchhaiya, R.; Dixit, V.; Alok, S. Paederia foetida linn: phytochemistry, pharmacological and traditional uses. IJPSR 2013, 4, 4525–4530. [Google Scholar]
  15. Giusti, F.; Caprioli, G.; Ricciutelli, M.; Vittori, S.; Sagratini, G. Determination of fourteen polyphenols in pulses by high performance liquid chromatography-diode array detection (HPLC-DAD) and correlation study with antioxidant activity and colour. Food chem. 2017, 221, 689––697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. van de Loosdrecht, A.A.; Nennie, E.; Ossenkoppele, G.J.; Beelen, R.H.; Langenhuijsen, M.M. Cell mediated cytotoxicity against U 937 cells by human monocytes and macrophages in a modified colorimetric MTT assay: A methodological study. J. Immunol. Methods 1991, 141, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Upadhyaya, S. Screening of phytochemicals, nutritional status, antioxidant and antibacterial activity of Paederia foetida Linn. from different localities of Assam, India. J. Pharm. Res. 2013, 7, 139–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gierschner, J.; Cornil, J.; Egelhaaf, H.J. Optical bandgaps of π-conjugated organic materials at the polymer limit: experiment and theory. Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, 173–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Platzer, M.; Kiese, S.; Herfellner, T.; Schweiggert-Weisz, U.; Eisner, P. How Does the Phenol Structure Influence the Results of the Folin-Ciocalteu Assay? Antioxidants 2021, 10, 811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Alén-Ruiz, F.; García-Falcón, M.S.; Pérez-Lamela, M.C.; Martínez-Carballo, E.; Simal-Gándara, J. Influence of major polyphenols on antioxidant activity in Mencía and Brancellao red wines. Food Chem. 2009, 113, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vidal-Casanella, O.; Moreno-Merchan, J.; Granados, M.; Nuñez, O.; Saurina, J.; Sentellas, S. Total Polyphenol Content in Food Samples and Nutraceuticals: Antioxidant Indices versus High Performance Liquid Chromatography. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Anouar, E.H.; Gierschner, J.; Duroux, J.L.; Trouillas, P. UV/Visible spectra of natural polyphenols: a time-dependent density functional theory study. Food Chem. 2012, 131, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rodrigues, D.B.; Veríssimo, L.; Finimundy, T.; Rodrigues, J.; Oliveira, I.; Gonçalves, J; Fernandes, I.P.; Barros, L.; Heleno, S.A.; Calhelha, R.C. Chemical and Bioactive Screening of Green Polyphenol-Rich Extracts from Chestnut By-Products: An Approach to Guide the Sustainable Production of High-Added Value Ingredients. Foods 2023, 12, 2596. [CrossRef]
  24. Feng, R.Z.; Wang, Q.; Tong, W.Z.; Xiong, J.; Wei, Q.; Zhou, W.H.; Li, L.X. Extraction and antioxidant activity of flavonoids of Morus nigra. IJCEM 2015, 8, 22328–22336. [Google Scholar]
  25. Dutta, P.P.; Marbaniang, K.; Sen, S.; Dey, B.K.; Talukdar, N.C. A review on phytochemistry of Paederia foetida Linn. Phytomedicine 2023, 3, 100411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, Y.; Zhe, W.; Zhang, R.; Peng, Z.; Wang, Y.; Gao, H.; Guo, Z.; Xiao, J. Ultrasonic-assisted extraction of polyphenolic compounds from Paederia scandens (Lour.) Merr. Using deep eutectic solvent: optimization; identification; and comparison with traditional methods. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2022, 86,106005. [CrossRef]
  27. Priyanto, J.A.; Prastya, M.E.; Sinarawadi, G.S.; Datu’salamah, W.; Avelina, T.Y.; Yanuar, A.I.A.; Azizah, E.; Tachrim, Z.P.; Mozef, T. The antibacterial and antibiofilm potential of Paederia foetida Linn. leaves extract. J. Appl. Pharm.Sci. 2022, 12, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yunita, M.; Ohiwal, M.; Elfitrasya, M.Z.; Rahawarin, H. Antibacterial activity of Paederia foetida leaves using two different extraction procedures against pathogenic bacteria. Biodiversitas 2023, 24, 5920––5927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xiao, M.; Fu, X.; Ni, Y.; Chen, J.; Jian, S.; Wang, L.; Du, G. Protective effects of Paederia scandens extract on rheumatoid arthritis mouse model by modulating gut microbiota. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2018, 226, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Milutinović, M.; Dimitrijević-Branković, S.; Rajilić-Stojanović, M. Plant extracts rich in polyphenols as potent modulators in the growth of probiotic and pathogenic intestinal microorganisms. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 688843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rodríguez-Daza, M.C.; Pulido-Mateos, E.C.; Lupien-Meilleur, J.; Guyonnet, D.; Desjardins, Y.; Roy, D. Polyphenol-mediated gut microbiota modulation: toward prebiotics and further. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 689456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Esteban-Fernández, A.; Zorraquín-Peña, I.; Ferrer, M.D.; Mira, A.; Bartolomé, B.; Gonzalez de Llano, D.; Moreno-Arribas, M.V. Inhibition of oral pathogens adhesion to human gingival fibroblasts by wine polyphenols alone and in combination with an oral probiotic. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 2071–2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nostro, A.; Roccaro, A.S.; Bisignano, G.; Marino, A.; Cannatelli, M.A.; Pizzimenti, F.C.; Blanco, A.R. Effects of oregano; carvacrol and thymol on Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms. J. Med. Microbiol. 2007, 56, 519–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sultana, B.; Anwar, F.; Ashraf, M.; Saari, N. Effect of drying techniques on the total phenolic. J. Med. Plants Res. 2012, 6, 161––167. [Google Scholar]
  35. Khan, M.; Liu, H.; Wang, J.; Sun, B. Inhibitory effect of phenolic compounds and plant extracts on the formation of advance glycation end products: A comprehensive review. Int. Food Res. 2020, 130, 108933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Twetman, S. Are we ready for caries prevention through bacteriotherapy? Braz. Oral Res. 2012, 26, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ghomari, O.; Sounni, F.; Massaoudi, Y.; Ghanam, J.; Drissi Kaitouni, L.B.; Merzouki, M.; Benlemlih, M. Phenolic profile (HPLC-UV) of olive leaves according to extraction procedure and assessment of antibacterial activity. Biotechnol. Rep. (Amst.) 2019, 23, e00347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Dai, J.; Mumper, R.J. Plant Phenolics: Extraction; Analysis and Their Antioxidant and Anticancer Properties. Molecules 2010, 15, 7313–7352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Bouyahya, A.; Guaouguaou, F.E.; El Omari, N.; El Menyiy, N.; Balahbib, A.; El-Shazly, M.; Bakri, Y. Anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties of Moroccan medicinal plants: Phytochemistry; in vitro and in vivo investigations; mechanism insights; clinical evidences and perspectives. J. Pharm. Anal. 2022, 12, 35–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nouri, Z.; Fakhri, S.; Nouri, K.; Wallace, C.E.; Farzaei, M.H.; Bishayee, A. Targeting Multiple Signaling Pathways in Cancer: The Rutin Therapeutic Approach. Cancers 2020, 12, 2276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Milojković-Opsenica, D.; Andrić, F.; Šegan, S.; Trifković, J.; Tešić, Ž. Thin-layer chromatography in quantitative structure-activity relationship studies. Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies 2018, 41, 272–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chung, Y.C.; Lee, J.N.; Kim, B.S.; Hyun, C.-G. Anti-Melanogenic Effects of Paederia foetida L. Extract via MAPK Signaling-Mediated MITF Downregulation. Cosmetics 2021, 8, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pradhan, N.; Parbin, S.; Kausar, C.; Kar, S.; Mawatwal, S.; Das, L.; Deb, M.; Sengupta, D.; Dhiman, R.; Patra, S.K. (2019). Paederia foetida induces anticancer activity by modulating chromatin modification enzymes and altering pro-inflammatory cytokine gene expression in human prostate cancer cells. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2019, 130, 161–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Priyanto, J.A.; Prastya, M.E.; Primahana, G.; Randy, A.; Utami, D.T. Paederia foetida Linn Leaves-Derived Extract Showed Antioxidant and Cytotoxic Properties Against Breast Carcinoma Cell. HAYATI J. Biosci. 2023, 30, 271–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Di Meo, M.C.; De Cristofaro, G.A.; Imperatore, R.; Rocco, M.; Giaquinto, D.; Palladino, A.; Zotti, T.; Vito, P.; Paolucci, M.; Varricchio, E. Microwave-Assisted Extraction of Olive Leaf from Five Italian Cultivars: Effects of Harvest-Time and Extraction Conditions on Phenolic Compounds and In Vitro Antioxidant Properties. ACS Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 2, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Arvouet-Grand, A.; Vennat, B.; Pourrat, A.; Legret, P. Standardisation d'un extrait de propolis et identification des principaux constituants [Standardization of propolis extract and identification of principal constituents]. J Pharm Belg. 1994, 49, 462–468. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. De Cristofaro, G.A.; Paolucci, M.; Pappalardo, D.; Pagliarulo, C.; Sessini, V.; Lo Re, G. Interface interactions driven antioxidant properties in olive leaf extract/cellulose nanocrystals/poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) biomaterials. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 272, 132509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Seruga, M.; Novak, I.; Jakobek, L. Determination of Polyphenols Content and Antioxidant Activity of Some Red Wines by Differential Pulse Voltammetry; HPLC and Spectrophotometric Methods. Food Chem. 2011, 124, 1208––1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kalt, W.; MacKinnon, S.; McDonald, J.; Vinqvist, M.; Craft, C.; Howell, A. Phenolics of Vaccinium berries and other fruit crops. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2008, 88, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sateriale, D.; Facchiano, S.; Colicchio, R.; Pagliuca, C.; Varricchio, E.; Paolucci, M.; Volpe, M.G.; Salvatore, P.; Pagliarulo, C. In vitro Synergy of Polyphenolic Extracts From Honey; Myrtle and Pomegranate Against Oral Pathogens; S. mutans and R. dentocariosa. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Forgione, G.; De Cristofaro, G.A.; Sateriale, D.; Pagliuca, C.; Colicchio, R.; Salvatore, P.; Paolucci, M.; Pagliarulo, C. Pomegranate Peel and Olive Leaf Extracts to Optimize the Preservation of Fresh Meat: Natural Food Additives to Extend Shelf-Life. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bauer, A.; Kirby, W.; Sherris, J.; Turck, M. (1966). Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disc method. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1966, 45, 493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antibacterial Susceptibility Testing; 32nd ed.; CLSI Supplement M100; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne; PA; USA; 2022; ISBN 978-1-68440-134-5.
  54. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Methods for Dilution Antibacterial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically; Approved Standard-Tenth Edition; CLSI Document M07-A10; Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute: Waine; PA; USA; 2015. Available online: https://clsi.org/media/1632/m07a10_sample.pdf.
Figure 1. Representative chromatograms of Paederia grandidieri leaf extracts recorded by A) UV-Vis 280 nm, B) UV-Vis 360 nm and C) FDL/FP conditions. PG1: aqueous extract at 25°C for 24 hours; PG3: aqueous extract at 60°C for 24 hours; PG5: hydro-alcoholic extract at 25°C for 24 hours. The chromatogram profiles of PG2 and PG4 are similar to those of PG3 and PG5, respectively.
Figure 1. Representative chromatograms of Paederia grandidieri leaf extracts recorded by A) UV-Vis 280 nm, B) UV-Vis 360 nm and C) FDL/FP conditions. PG1: aqueous extract at 25°C for 24 hours; PG3: aqueous extract at 60°C for 24 hours; PG5: hydro-alcoholic extract at 25°C for 24 hours. The chromatogram profiles of PG2 and PG4 are similar to those of PG3 and PG5, respectively.
Preprints 138189 g001
Figure 2. UV-spectra of representative peaks at a wavelength of 280 nm. A) and B) UV-Spectra of compounds as rutin analogue and rutin, respectively. Rutin was assigned based on comparison with retention time and UV-spectra of standard reference, rutine analogue based on UV-spectra. C) and D) UV-Spectra of compounds as caffeic acid and caffeic acid analogue, respectively. Caffeic acid was assigned based on comparison with retention time and UV-spectra of standard reference, caffeic acid analogue based on UV-spectra.
Figure 2. UV-spectra of representative peaks at a wavelength of 280 nm. A) and B) UV-Spectra of compounds as rutin analogue and rutin, respectively. Rutin was assigned based on comparison with retention time and UV-spectra of standard reference, rutine analogue based on UV-spectra. C) and D) UV-Spectra of compounds as caffeic acid and caffeic acid analogue, respectively. Caffeic acid was assigned based on comparison with retention time and UV-spectra of standard reference, caffeic acid analogue based on UV-spectra.
Preprints 138189 g002
Figure 4. Viability of L929 cells against different concentrations of Paederia grandidieri extracts at 24 and (A) and 48 (B) hours. PG1: aqueous extract at 25°C for 24 hours; PG3: aqueous extract at 60°C for 24 hours; PG5: hydro-alcoholic extract at 25°C for 24 hours. Data represent mean ± SD. Significant differences from control were defined as * p < 0.01, ** p < 0.001 and *** p < 0.0001. The dashed line represents the 80% cell survival threshold, corresponding to the inhibitory concentration 20 (IC20).
Figure 4. Viability of L929 cells against different concentrations of Paederia grandidieri extracts at 24 and (A) and 48 (B) hours. PG1: aqueous extract at 25°C for 24 hours; PG3: aqueous extract at 60°C for 24 hours; PG5: hydro-alcoholic extract at 25°C for 24 hours. Data represent mean ± SD. Significant differences from control were defined as * p < 0.01, ** p < 0.001 and *** p < 0.0001. The dashed line represents the 80% cell survival threshold, corresponding to the inhibitory concentration 20 (IC20).
Preprints 138189 g004
Table 1. Total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), and % of oxidative inhibition of Paederia grandidieri leaf extracts. TPC and TFC are expressed as milligram equivalents of gallic acid and quercetin, respectively, per gram of dry matter.
Table 1. Total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), and % of oxidative inhibition of Paederia grandidieri leaf extracts. TPC and TFC are expressed as milligram equivalents of gallic acid and quercetin, respectively, per gram of dry matter.
Extract TPC (mg GAE g−1) TFC (mg QuercetinE g-1) % oxidative inhibition
PG1 40.58 ± 4.25a 30.07 ± 1.09 a 83.95 ± 0.87a
PG2 33.05 ± 5.31a 32.06 ± 0.29 a 71.53 ± 1.56b
PG3 37.19 ± 2.66a 31.76 ± 0.99 a 77.62 ± 4.20a
PG4 21.62 ± 2.39b 19.52 ± 1.41 b 58.86 ± 4.36c
PG5 23.23 ± 0.74b 26.63 ± 3.19 a 59.09 ± 1.75c
The values are indicated as mean ± SD. Letters indicate statistical significance.
Table 3. Inhibitory Concentration 20 (IC20) values of Paederia grandideri leaf extracts at 24 and 48 hours. PG1: aqueous extract at 25°C for 24 hours; PG3: aqueous extract at 60°C for 24 hours; PG5: hydro-alcoholic extract at 25°C for 24 hours. IC20 values represent the concentrations required to inhibit 20% of cell viability for different extracts of P. grandidieri at 24 and 48 hours. The IC20 values are expressed in μg/ml and indicate the cytotoxic potency of each extract. Lower IC20 values correspond to higher cytotoxicity.
Table 3. Inhibitory Concentration 20 (IC20) values of Paederia grandideri leaf extracts at 24 and 48 hours. PG1: aqueous extract at 25°C for 24 hours; PG3: aqueous extract at 60°C for 24 hours; PG5: hydro-alcoholic extract at 25°C for 24 hours. IC20 values represent the concentrations required to inhibit 20% of cell viability for different extracts of P. grandidieri at 24 and 48 hours. The IC20 values are expressed in μg/ml and indicate the cytotoxic potency of each extract. Lower IC20 values correspond to higher cytotoxicity.
Extract IC20 (24 hours) (μg/ml) IC20 (48 hours) (μg/ml)
PG1 168±1.8b 283±1.6c
PG2 360±2.7d 258±2.1c
PG3 528±3.8e 600±3.2e
PG4 170±2.5b 246±1.9c
PG5 125±2.1a 240±1.7c
The values are presented as mean ± SD based on triplicate measurements. Letters indicate statistical significance.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated